Comparison of serum digoxin level measurement with acetyl strophanthidin tolerance testing

[Cardiovascular manifestations in patients with COPD]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized mainly by airway obstruction due to chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema. In addition, COPD is frequently associated with other health problems with serious systemic manifestations. In particular, COPD patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge about cardiovascular disease in patients with COPD mainly concerns the high prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias in this population. Systemic hypertension, cardiovascular disease, heart failure and cerebro-vascular disease are also frequently encountered. This review discusses the cardiovascular manifestations associated with COPD, excluding right heart failure due to pulmonary hypertension.

VIEWPOINTS AND CONCLUSION

Non pulmonary health problems in patients with COPD, such as cardiovascular disease, are arousing increasing interest in the medical community. More studies are needed to increase our knowledge of cardiovascular disease in COPD and allow better medical management of patients.

Exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia: a rare manifestation of digitalis toxicity

Digitalis intoxication is one of the most common adverse drug reactions. Although some arrhythmias are seen more frequently than others, virtually any rhythm disturbance, including ventricular tachycardia, may occur. However, to our knowledge, exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia as a complication of digitalis therapy has never been described before. This case presents a patient with a digitalis-induced ventricular tachycardia occurring exclusively during exercise.

Recognition and management of digitalis toxicity

The most important step in the management of toxicity due to any of the cardiac glycosides is its recognition. Despite the development of an accurate clinical assay for serum levels of digoxin greater than 20 years ago, digitalis toxicity remains common and difficult to confirm, even if suspected, due primarily to 2 factors. First, the signs and symptoms of digitalis toxicity, most commonly an abnormal electrocardiogram showing ventricular or atrial arrhythmias, with or without some degree of concurrent atrioventricular block, often also occur in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and underlying coronary atherosclerosis who are not receiving a cardiac glycoside. Second, due to digoxin's narrow therapeutic ratio, the marked degree of variability in the sensitivity of individual patients to its toxic effects, and the common problem of obtaining blood samples inappropriately during the early distribution phase following dosing, a serum digoxin concentration often does not serve as a reliable indicator of toxicity. Despite these difficulties in diagnosis, the management of digoxin toxicity has been made much more effective with the widespread availability of F(ab) fragments of anti-digoxin antibodies. This drug provides the clinician with a rapidly acting, safe antidote for all commonly used digitalis preparations. Conventional therapy for digoxin toxicity remains the maintenance of serum potassium levels greater than or equal to 4 mEq/liter, reversal of decompensated CHF or overt myocardial ischemia, attention to serum magnesium levels and the patient's acid-base status, appropriate antiarrhythmics in the event of ventricular arrhythmias, and a temporary pacemaker for high-grade atrioventricular block. Nevertheless, the high specificity and documented safety of the antibody preparation provides a needed safety net for the continuing use of cardiac glycosides as first-line inotropic agents in the modern therapy of chronic CHF.

Digoxin toxicity in patients with high serum digoxin concentrations

A retrospective study of the clinical course and outcome of patients with serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) greater than 3 ng/mL was conducted to determine the probability of a patient without initial signs or symptoms of digoxin toxicity subsequently developing signs or symptoms. Of 123 patients with SDCs greater than 3 ng/mL, 54 had no apparent signs or symptoms of toxicity at the time the index SDC was determined (group 1). Of these 54, two patients developed definite digoxin toxicity, although neither suffered significant morbidity. Digoxin administration was reduced or discontinued in all patients but one in group 1. There were no significant differences between the patients who had no signs or symptoms of digoxin toxicity (group 1) and those who did have signs or symptoms (group 2) in the mean SDC (3.9 +/- 0.1 vs 4.2 +/- 0.2 ng/mL, respectively), the serum creatinine (2.9 +/- 0.2 vs 3.4 +/- 0.4 mg/dL), or the incidence of atrial fibrillation (29/54 vs. 35/69) and coronary artery disease (21/54 vs. 18/69). The authors conclude that clinically stable patients receiving digoxin who have elevated SDCs but are without signs or symptoms of digoxin toxicity are at low risk of developing serious digoxin toxicity and do not generally require treatment beyond the discontinuation of digoxin therapy.

New advances in the assessment and treatment of digitalis toxicity

The narrow margin between the therapeutic and toxic doses and serum levels of cardiac glycosides results in a high incidence of digitalis toxicity. This common problem has led to the development of methods for determining serum glycosides concentrations. It is clear that overlap of serum digoxin levels occurs between groups of patients with and without evidence of toxicity. In spite of these difficulties, use of serum digoxin measurement has been reported to be associated with a lower incidence of digitalis intoxication in clinical practice. When digitalis toxicity does develop, it is generally of two types: disturbances of impulse formation and disturbances of conduction. Therapeutic interventions may include antiarrhythmic drugs, pacemaker placement, and, in the most severe cases, administration of cardiac glycosides-specific antibodies. Recent studies have shown that monoclonal digoxin-specific antibodies and Fab fragments obtained by somatic cell fusion are effective in reversing advanced and otherwise lethal digoxin intoxication. The homogeneity of this antibody offers attractive possibilities for improving our ability to treat advanced digitalis intoxication safely and effectively.

Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and serum levels of cardiac glycosides

Digoxin, the cardiac glycoside most frequently used in clinical practice in the United States, can be given orally or intravenously and has an excretory half-life of 36 to 48 hours in patients with serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values in the normal range. Since the drug is excreted predominantly by the kidney, the half-life is prolonged progressively with diminishing renal function, reaching about 5 days on average in patients who are essentially anephric. Serum protein binding of digoxin is only about 20%, and differs markedly in this regard from that of digitoxin, which is 97% bound by serum albumin at usual therapeutic levels. Digitoxin is nearly completely absorbed from the normal gastrointestinal tract and has a half-life averaging 5 to 6 days in patients receiving usual doses irrespective of renal function. The bioavailability of digoxin is appreciably less than that of digitoxin, averaging about two-thirds to three-fourths of the equivalent dose given intravenously in the case of currently available tablet formulations. Recent studies have shown that gut flora of about 10% of patients reduce digoxin to a less bioactive dihydro derivative. This process is sensitive to antibiotic administration, creating the potential for important interactions among drugs. Serum or plasma concentrations of digitalis glycosides can be measured by radioimmunoassay methods that are now widely available, but knowledge of serum levels does not substitute for a sound working knowledge of the clinical pharmacology of the preparation used and careful patient follow-up.

Long-term survival of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia treated with antiarrhythmic drugs

The protective effect of antiarrhythmic agents for patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia (defined as noninfarction ventricular fibrillation or sustained hemodynamically compromising ventricular tachycardia) remains uncertain. We have analyzed survival among 123 such patients (98 males, 25 females, average age 53.6 years) dependent on the abolition of antiarrhythmic drugs of salvos of ventricular tachycardia and R-on-T ventricular premature beats (Lown grades 4B and 5). Over an average follow-up of 29.6 months there were 35 deaths (11.2 percent annual mortality rate) of whom 23 patients succumbed suddenly (8.2 percent annual mortality rate). Among 98 patients in whom antiarrhythmic drugs abolished grades 4B and 5 ventricular premature beats, only 6 sudden deaths occurred for a 2.3 percent annual mortality rate. Of the 25 patients in whom advanced ventricular premature beats were not controlled, 17 died suddenly. Seventy-nine patients had left ventricular studies suitable for analysis. Among 44 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, control of ventricular premature beats was a critical element predicting survival. The annual sudden death rate for the 12 noncontrolled patients with left ventricular dysfunction was 41 percent contrasting with only 3.1 percent for the 32 patients with similar abnormalities in ventricular function in whom advanced ventricular premature beats were abolished. It is concluded that antiarrhythmic drugs can protect against the recurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients who have manifest ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia and that abolition of certain advanced grades of ventricular premature beats provides an effective therapeutic objective.

Serum digoxin levels in elderly nursing home patients: appraisal of routine periodic measurements

An assessment was made of the clinical value of routine periodic measurement of serum digoxin levels in 51 elderly nursing home patients with cardiac disease. The findings showed that the serum digoxin level was not correlated with the dosage of digoxin nor the patient's clinical state of digitalization. All patients were effectively digitalized, as judged clinically, and no digitalis toxicity occurred despite a wide range of serum digoxin levels. When adequate medical supervision, electrocardiograms, roentgenograms, serum electrolyte determinations and renal function tests are available, the routine periodic measurement of serum digoxin concentration does not offer any additional benefit in the management of nursing home patients with cardiac disease.

Correlative studies of serum digitalis levels and the arrhythmias of digitalis intoxication

Correlative studies of serum digoxin levels, cardiac rhythm and related clinical laboratory data were carried out in 114 patients. Seventy-three patients who presented with 79 episodes of arrhythmias typical of digitalis intoxication could be separated into a normokalemic group of 55 patients whose serum digoxin level was 6.68 +/- 0.17 ng/ml (mean +/- standard error of the mean), and a hypokalemic group of 24 with a mean serum digoxin level of 1.13 +/- 0.04 ng/ml (P less than 0.001). Of 45 consectutive normokalemic patients with a high serum digoxin level (more than 2 mg/ml) who underwent serial studies, 17 had arrhythmias. Serial studies in 10 hypokalemic patients revealed an inconsistent relation between presence of arrhythmia and serum digoxin level. During repletion of serum potassium in seven of these patients with an arrhythmia, the arrhythmia disappeared without a significant change in serum digoxin level in four patients. A group of seven patients had 16 episodes of serum digoxin level greater than 2.2 ng/ml, but an arrhythmia occurred during only 3 of these episodes. A sharp border between toxic and therapeutic serum digoxin values was not found in these groups of study patients. The serum digoxin level at which arrhythmias occurred appeared to be variable for both groups and individual patients. However, correlative studies utilizing serum digoxin levels can define existing thresholds for therapeutic and toxic effects and may often be more useful than isolated observations.

Studies on digitalis. XIII. A prospective study of 649 patients on maintenance treatment with digitoxin

In a prospective study of digitalis intoxication in 649 patients on maintenance treatment with digitoxin a low incidence of digitalis toxicity was found, namely, 5.8 per cent. This is mainly due to a more careful use to digitalis glycosides. It is especially important to reduce the dose of digitoxin in the liver and partly excreted metabolized in the liver and partly excreted through the kidneys as metabolities. Serum half-time of digitoxin is shortened in patients with impaired renal function. Patients with reduced renal function may be treated with digitoxin in the same doses as individuals with normal renal function. This is in contrast to patients treated with digoxin. Digitoxin should therefore be the cardiac glycoside of choice in treatment of patients with renal failure. Digitoxin is further rapidly eliminated in patients with reduced liver function in spite of its extensive hepatic metabolism. In this study extracardia symptoms were found equally often as cardiac signs of toxicity. Patients intoxicated usually had several symptoms and signs of toxicity at the same time. The specificity of commonly used symptoms and signs a digitalis intoxication is very low. In this study atrial tachycardia with block, which has been considered to be an important cardiotoxic arrhythmia, very seldom was found in digitalis intoxication. There is an overlap in digitalis serum concentration between toxic and nontoxic patients. The diagnosis of toxicity was made on clinical grounds. Most of the intoxicated patients had high serum concentrations, but some had concentrations in the normal or low range. Apart from being a guide to the diagnosis of digitalis intoxication, serum digitalis levels may further be a guide to underdigitalization of cardiac patients, especially patients in sinus rhythm.

Effect of a digitalis drug on ventricular premature beats

To determine the efficacy of digitalis drugs in suppressing ventricular ectopic activity, 142 patients with frequent (greater than 1 per minute) ventricular premature beats underwent acetyl strophanthidin tolerance testing. In 65 patients (46 per cent), frequency and grade were reduced during testing. In 37 (26 per cent), the ectopic activity remained unaltered; frequency increased during testing in the remaining 40 patients (28 per cent). In the group with a suppressive effect, ventricular premature beats decreased by 82 per cent, with complete abolition of arrhythmias in 46 per cent. The three groups were not distinguishable clinically by either the type or the extent of heart disease. The antiarrhythmic action of acetyl strophanthidin did not appear to depend upon its positive inotropic action. In some patients it appears to be due to an indirect reduction of Purkinje-fiber automaticity resulting from enhanced vagus-nerve activity that thereby lessens adrenergic tone on the heart.

Basis for recurring ventricular fibrillation in the absence of coronary heart disease and its management

A 39-year-old man twice experienced ventricular fibrillation and exhibited numerous ventricular premature beats. Coronary arteries were normal, and no impaired cardiac function was found upon catheterization. Evidence was adduced that the ventricular premature beats were related to higher nervous activity. The patient had serious psychiatric problems; the ventricular premature beats were provoked by psychophysiologic stress, increased during REM sleep, were reduced by meditation, and were controlled by beta-adrenergic blockade, phenytoin and digitalization. We conclude that psychologic and neurophysiologic factors may predispose to life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia in the absence of organic heart disease. Effective management of the recurrent ventricular arrhythmia involved; acute drug testing for assessing antiarrhythmic efficacy; use of programmed trendscription to provide on-line information on drug action; a treatment program involving more than one agent; and use of measures to reduce sympathetic nervous activity.