Efficacy of propranolol in the control of exercise-induced or augmented ventricular ectopic activity

Chronic ventricular arrhythmias: which drug for which patient?

Many agents, including a number of drugs recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, are now available for the treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmias. The so-called first-generation agents--quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide--have been used in large numbers of patients for many years, and the safety and efficacy profiles of these drugs are well established. The "second-generation" antiarrhythmic agents recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration offer promising new alternatives; however, their safety and efficacy profiles have yet to be confirmed for broad populations over extended periods of time. Although it is recognized that the choice of agent for treatment of a particular patient is a "therapeutic trial," with an unpredictable outcome of efficacy and adverse effects, certain "descriptors," such as patient age or co-existing medical conditions, are often helpful in determining which agent is most likely to be clinically effective, and which agents are most likely to produce adverse effects. When other medical conditions such as hepatic or renal failure are present, the appropriate choice of drug and dosage is required for optimal management of the arrhythmia and for prevention of overdosage, exacerbation of other medical problems and deleterious interactions. Combination therapy with multiple antiarrhythmic agents is often quite effective for increasing arrhythmia control without increasing adverse effects. However dosage modifications are often necessary when an antiarrhythmic drug is given in conjunction with another such agent, or with agents that also have electrophysiologic activity or modify metabolic or elimination functions. The following report is one clinician's approach for optimizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity while using the difficult class of drugs called antiarrhythmic agents. It will encourage the use of certain drugs before others, based on considerations of efficacy, safety, ease of administration, follow-up, and other factors.

Beta blockers in combination with class I antiarrhythmic agents

The hemodynamic and antiarrhythmic interactions between nadolol and a commonly used class I antiarrhythmic agent, quinidine or procainamide, were evaluated in 18 patients with ventricular arrhythmias in a double-blind, parallel study. Patients qualified for entry into the study if their ventricular arrhythmias remained poorly controlled (greater than or equal to 10 ventricular premature complexes/hr) with the class I agent alone and they had a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 30%. Patients received their usual therapeutic doses of quinidine or procainamide throughout the study, which consisted of 3 treatment periods; a 2-week placebo treatment period, a 2-week open-label oral nadolol dose titration period, during which the dosages of nadolol were gradually increased from 40 mg daily to a maximum tolerated dose up to 120 mg daily, and a 4-week randomized, parallel comparison period during which patients were treated with either a class I agent alone or a combination of a class I agent and nadolol. Left ventricular ejection fractions by radionuclide ventriculography and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) recordings were obtained at the end of each treatment period. A positive treatment response was defined as greater than or equal to 75% reduction in ventricular premature complex frequency. During the dose titration phase, combination therapy with nadolol (mean dose 94 mg daily) and class I agents produced a mean decrease in ventricular premature complexes of 79% (p less than 0.01), and a mean decrease in ventricular couplets of 95% (p less than 0.01). A positive response was observed in 57% of patients treated with nadolol plus a class I agent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The role of beta blocking agents as adjunct therapy to membrane stabilizing drugs in malignant ventricular arrhythmia

Antiarrhythmic drugs are often either partially or totally ineffective for the suppression of ventricular arrhythmias in a given patient. Drug combinations afford an additional therapeutic option. We report the role of beta-blocking agents as adjunct therapy to membrane stabilizing drugs in the management of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The study group included 54 patients who were evaluated by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring and symptom-limited exercise testing. Patients underwent control studies without antiarrhythmic drugs, were evaluated on membrane stabilizing drugs and beta blocking agents separately, and were then tested on combination therapy. The combination of a beta-blocking agent and a membrane stabilizing drug abolished ventricular tachycardia and couplets in 83% and 86% of exercise tests in patients with this arrhythmia present during therapy with membrane drugs alone (p less than 0.01). The addition of a beta blocker to a membrane drug, as evaluated by ambulatory monitoring, resulted in an abolition of ventricular tachycardia and couplets in 43% and 20% of studies (p less than 0.05). Ventricular premature beat frequency was reduced by more than 50% in 65% of exercise tests and in 52% of monitoring studies (p less than 0.05). In this population, beta-blocking agents failed to reduce ventricular arrhythmias when used alone. Thus the addition of a beta blocker to a membrane stabilizing drug significantly enhances the suppression of ventricular arrhythmia, especially when assessed by exercise testing. This results from synergistic drug effects of the combination rather than from the effect of the individual drugs.

Propranolol in cardiac arrhythmias: a comparative study of the conventional and long-acting formulations

The comparative anti-arrhythmic effect of equivalent daily doses of conventional propranolol ('Inderal') and long-acting propranolol ('Inderal' LA) was assessed in a double-blind, crossover study lasting 6 weeks in 13 patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Patients were investigated using 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. Both formulations of propranolol significantly reduced the heart rate, together with the number of ventricular premature beats and ventricular couplets, with no significant difference between treatments. The two formulations also produced similar plasma concentrations of propranolol. The long-acting formulation of propranolol proved an effective anti-arrhythmic treatment which, with once-daily dosage, may improve patient compliance with treatment.

Hemodynamic actions of bepridil during treatment of stable angina pectoris

Bepridil, a new calcium-entry blocker, was evaluated in 13 patients with chronic stable angina in a single-blind trial that was placebo controlled within patients. Its antianginal effects were recorded and left ventricular (LV) function was assessed at rest and during exercise by gated blood pool scintigraphy. Mean anginal frequency was significantly reduced from 7.3 to 3.4 episodes/week (p less than 0.01). Total work performed increased from 336 to 625 kpm (p less than 0.01). Supine resting LV end-diastolic volume index, end-systolic volume index, stroke volume index, cardiac index and ejection fraction (EF) were not altered by bepridil. During supine exercise, the EF decreased from 60 to 55 during placebo therapy. Despite an increase in total work, the mean EF increased from 60 to 62 (p less than 0.05 versus exercise on placebo) during exercise with bepridil therapy. Maximal exercise stroke volume index and cardiac index were significantly greater during bepridil therapy. Exercise resulted in new or increased LV wall motion abnormalities in 7 of 13 patients during placebo therapy. During bepridil therapy, only 4 new or increased wall motion abnormalities were noted despite the increase in total work performed. Therefore, bepridil is an effective antianginal agent, allowing an increase in exercise workload while preserving LV performance.

Comparison of acebutolol and propranolol therapy for ventricular arrhythmias

The effects of acebutolol, a new investigational cardioselective beta blocker, and propranolol on ventricular arrhythmias were compared in 14 patients with more than 30 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) per hour. Each patient served as their own control, receiving both drugs and placebo in random sequence and in double-blind fashion, with an intervening one-week, drug-free period. Each drug was given for a two-month period, the maximum acebutolol dosage reaching 600 mg tid and the maximum propranolol dosage 80 mg tid. Seventy-two-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring assessed arrhythmia frequency for each study period. Mean PVC counts did not significantly differ during the two control periods. Acebutolol decreased mean PVC count by 65% (P less than .02), with eight patients exhibiting a 70% or greater decrease. Only three patients exhibited a similar decline with propranolol. The incidence of PVCs was not significantly decreased by propranolol. Acebutolol reduced the number of couplets by 70% (P less than .04), whereas propranolol did not significantly affect couplets. At the dosage of 600 mg tid, acebutolol was well tolerated, effectively suppressed total PVCs and couplets, and appeared to be more effective than propranolol administered at 80 mg tid.

Effects of nadolol on the spontaneous and exercise-provoked heart rate of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation receiving stable dosages of digoxin

Nadolol, a long-acting beta-adrenergic-blocking agent, was evaluated in 20 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation by means of a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Patients were required either to demonstrate resting heart rates in excess of 80 bpm or to show a rate of 120 bpm or an increment of greater than 50 bpm during mild treadmill exercise provocation (3 minutes, 1.75 mph, 10% grade). With placebo the group averaged a heart rate of 92 +/- 19 bpm, determined by 24 hours of ambulatory ECG recordings; this rate was significantly reduced to 73 +/- 16 bpm (p less than 0.001) with nadolol (mean dosage, 87 +/- 43 mg/day). During standardized exercise testing, heart rates increased to 153 +/- 26 bpm with placebo and to 111 +/- 24 bpm with nadolol (p less than 0.001), representing 65% and 52% increments, respectively. Digoxin blood levels averaged 0.8 +/- 0.5 ng/ml with placebo and were similar with nadolol (0.9 +/- 0.4; p = NS). Total exercise time on a modified Bruce treadmill protocol was 466 +/- 143 seconds with placebo and was significantly decreased by nadolol (380 +/- 143; p less than 0.01). During initial dose titration with nadolol, one patient was dropped from study for intolerable fatigue and one for worsened claudication. No patients were dropped from the double-blind treatment periods, although two patients receiving nadolol and one patient receiving placebo complained of moderate fatigue. We conclude that nadolol is a safe and effective agent for the control of spontaneous and exercise-provoked heart rates in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who were already receiving digoxin treatment.

Reproducibility and treatment of exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia

Fourteen patients with exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent serial treadmill testing, and those with reproducible arrhythmia were treated with a beta-adrenergic blocking agent. In 11 patients (79%), VT of similar rate, morphologic characteristics and duration was reproduced on 2 consecutive treadmill tests performed 1 to 14 days apart. Beta blockade prevented recurrent VT during acute testing in 10 of 11 patients and during chronic therapy in 9. Eight patients had a consistent relation between a critical sinus rate and the onset of VT. In these patients, successful therapy correlated with preventing achievement of the critical sinus rate during maximal exercise. Thus, serial exercise testing is an appropriate means of assessing efficacy of therapy in patients with exercise-induced VT, provided that reproducibility is established on 2 control tests before beginning treatment. Therapy with beta-blocking agents is effective, especially when guided by the presence of a critical sinus rate-VT relation.

Evaluation of bepridil, a new antianginal agent: clinical and hemodynamic alterations during the treatment of stable angina pectoris

The antianginal effects of bepridil, a new calcium entry blocker, were evaluated in 20 patients with chronic stable angina in a single-blind trial that was placebo-controlled within patients. Of the 20 patients, 13 also underwent rest and exercise gated blood pool scintigraphy to assess the effects of the agent on left ventricular (LV) performance. Mean anginal frequency was significantly reduced, from 7.3 to 3.1 episodes/week (p less than 0.01). Total work performed increased from 410 to 581 kpm (p less than 0.005), and exercise time increased from 5.3 to 6.6 minutes (p less than 0.005). Supine resting LV end-diastolic volume index, end-systolic volume index, stroke volume index, cardiac index and ejection fraction (EF) were not altered by bepridil. During supine exercise, EF decreased from 60 to 55% during placebo therapy. Despite an increase in total work, the mean EF increased from 60 to 62% (p less than 0.05 vs exercise placebo) during exercise with bepridil therapy. Maximal exercise stroke volume index and cardiac index were significantly greater during bepridil therapy. Exercise resulted in new or increased LV wall motion abnormalities in 7 of 13 patients during placebo therapy. During bepridil therapy, only 4 new or increased wall motion abnormalities were noted despite the increase in total work performed. Thus, bepridil is an effective antianginal agent. The drug allows an increase in exercise work load and preserves LV performance.

Evaluation of metoprolol in suppressing complex ventricular arrhythmias

This study documents the extent of suppression of premature ventricular beats which can be achieved with metoprolol, a semiselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent, at doses of 100 to 200 mg daily, utilizing a single-blind placebo-controlled 10-day protocol with continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic recording of 20 patients with cardiac disease and complex ventricular arrhythmias. Metoprolol (200 mg/day) resulted in suppression of 60% of total premature ventricular beats, with couplets (pairs) and ventricular tachycardia decreased 84% and 94%, respectively (all p less than 0.01). Exercise-induced premature ventricular beats, especially ventricular tachycardia, were effectively suppressed. The peak plasma metoprolol level to achieve these results was 72 +/- 34 ng/ml (mean +/- 1 standard deviation). At this plasma concentration, the mean 24-hour heart rate during normal activity was reduced from 78 +/- 8 beats/min (placebo) to 62 +/- 4 (metoprolol 200 mg/day) (p less than 0.001). Beta blockade also was demonstrated by a 20% reduction in heart rate during maximal Bruce exercise testing with metoprolol 200 mg/day. Although resting left ventricular function was not affected by metoprolol, pulmonary function tests show a statistically significant decrease in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced expiratory flow rates (25-75) reversible with a beta-2 agonist.

Pharmacologic treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: 25 years of progress

This review of practical and theoretical advances in antiarrhythmic drug therapy consists of four parts. Part 1, on clinical applications, compares the approaches to treatment 25 years ago with those of today, examines the current status of antiarrhythmic drugs used 25 years ago, reports on drugs approved for clinical use during the past 25 years, reviews new experimental drugs and suggests an approach to classification of antiarrhythmic drugs. Part 2 summarizes the contributions of cellular electrophysiology to the understanding of drug action, with emphasis on the drug-induced block of the voltage- and time-dependent properties of the rapid sodium channel. The subsequent section contains a brief discussion of the impact made by the new knowledge and the new diagnostic technology on the contemporary practices. The main conclusions are 1) that the more rational approach to treatment has benefited proportionately more patients with supraventricular than with ventricular arrhythmias, and 2) that new advances have made it possible to design successful treatments for certain patients with problems that could not be resolved in the past.

Ventricular antiarrhythmic effects of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs: a review of mechanism and clinical studies

Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs are now commonly used in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. This review examines the possible mechanisms of their ventricular antiarrhythmic effect. Actions on the myocardial cell, as well as actions on the central and autonomic nervous system, are reviewed. Many clinical studies have attempted to show the efficacy of beta blockers in controlling ventricular arrhythmia and decreasing the incidence of sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. Although some of these clinical trials tended to show an impact on sudden death, the size of these trials or their design problems do not allow firm conclusions to be made. The Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT) is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of propranolol currently under way in the United States. Important additions to the previous trials include the addition of drug levels to ensure beta-blocking dosage, long-term electrocardiographic monitoring, and a study population of 4200 patients followed for an average of three years. These important design features will be of value in addressing some of the unanswered questions presented in this review.

Variability of spontaneous and exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in the absence and presence of treatment with acebutolol or quinidine

A randomized double-blind crossover trial was undertaken in 20 volunteers to evaluate the effects of acebutolol and sustained release quinidine sulfate. The patients had an average of 10 or more premature ventricular complexes/hour on two 24 hour electrocardiographic recordings, or 10 or more/min during two cycle stress tests, or any number of complex forms of ventricular ectopic activity on either test. The 24 hour recordings yielded greater detection of complex forms than did stress tests and manifested similar relative variability in frequency of ventricular ectopic beats. The extent of variability from hour to hour within the 24 hour monitoring periods tended to have an increasing relation with frequency of ectopic beat activity regardless of the presence or absence of treatment. Within-patient variability among periods with equivalent treatment status also tended to have such an increasing relation with frequency of ectopic beat activity. About 35 percent of the variation was among subjects, 20 percent among months within subjects, 20 percent among days in months and 25 percent among hours in days. Acebutolol, 300 mg three times daily, produced effective beta receptor blockade and was better tolerated than sustained release quinidine sulfate in identical doses and had equal suppressant effects. The results of the variability studies provide guidelines for the design of adequate clinical trials testing suppressant interventions.

Comparison of nadolol, a new long-acting beta-receptor blocking agent, and placebo in the treatment of stable angina pectoris

Nadolol, a new nonselective beta 1 and beta 2 adrenergic blocking agent, has a plasma half-life of 17 to 23 hours. We studied 37 volunteers with stable angina pectoris who had five or more episodes of pain per week and who also had a 1 mm or greater ST segment depression 80 msec past the J point during a Bruce protocol treadmill test. An eight-week placebo controlled run-in period preceded double-blind randomization to nadolol administered once per day (17 patients) or identical appearing placebo for four weeks (20 patients), after which an exercise test was done. Diaries for pain episodes and nitroglycerin consumption were kept. Exercise tests were performed 24 hours after the last nadolol or placebo dose. Episodes of pain per week were reduced 59.8 percent after nadolol and 28.2 percent after placebo (P less than .01). Nitroglycerin consumption after nadolol was reduced 66.8 percent while after placebo it was reduced 36.2 percent (P less than .05). Resting and peak heart rates and peak rate-pressure products showed typical reductions due to beta-blockade 24 hours after nadolol compared with stability of these during placebo, all P less than .001. Exercise time after nadolol increased 42.2 percent, which was more than the 14.5 percent increase after placebo (P less than .05). Exercise work after nadolol increased 64.7 percent, greater than the 22 percent increase after placebo (P less than .05). Mean ST segment depression at end of exercise was little changed before and after treatment in both groups, reflecting consistency of effort. Improvement in symptoms and work capacity associated with nadolol significantly exceeded the placebo group responses. Unlike other available agents of this class, a single daily dose of nadolol produced therapeutically effective 24-hour beta-blockade in patients with disabling angina pectoris.

Submaximal exercise testing after unstable angina

Sixty-one consecutive men, mean age 56 years, who fulfilled criteria for unstable angina and who responded to medical therapy, underwent submaximal exercise testing prior to hospital discharge and at least 3 days after their last episode of angina. Forty-two patients were receiving propranolol at the time of exercise. Submaximal exercise was targeted to 120 beats/minute and strict criteria for the premature termination of each study were followed. Follow-up data were available on 55 patients post-discharge over a period of 6 to 36 weeks. No patient suffered recurrence of unstable angina or myocardial infarction due to the exercise test. Exercise was prematurely terminated by an ischemic response (chest pain and/or ST segment changes) in 34 patients (56%) and by leg fatigue in 13 patients (21%). Only five patients had exercise-induced ventricular ectopic activity, four of whom were not receiving propranolol. Nine patients achieved the target heart rate. Exercise-induced abnormal electrocardiographic changes predicted the postdischarge recurrence of episodes of unstable angina (p less than 0.05). Comparison of predischarge submaximal exercise data with postdischarge maximal exercise shows that recovery in cardiovascular function after unstable angina occurs soon after stabilization and prior to the submaximal test.

Effect of coronary arterial bypass surgery on exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study

The effect of coronary arterial bypass surgery on exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias and their relation to sudden death was examined in 102 patients with stable angina pectoris randomly assigned to medical and surgical therapy (54 and 48 patients, respectively). Symptom-limited treadmill tests were performed at entry and at 1 and 5 years. The surgical group demonstrated significant improvement in exercise performance at 1 year compared with the medical group, and at 5 years exercise-induced ischemia as evidenced by S-T depression and exertional angina remained substantially decreased in the surgical group with little change in the medical group. However, the frequency and severity of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in each group remained unchanged at 1 and 5 years from those at entry. Similar results were obtained from an evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias in the electrocardiogram at rest. With the exception of exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, no relation was found between ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Coronary bypass grafting does not decrease the frequency or severity of exercise-induced or resting ventricular arrhythmias. In patients with stable angina pectoris, with the exception of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias are poor predictors of sudden death. The data suggest that exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias may not be related to ischemia but to other effects of exercise such as cardiac stimulation by catecholamines or other factors.

Exercise testing in men with significant left main coronary disease

The exercise tests of 26 male patients with significant left main disease were compared with those of 51 patients with three-vessel disease and 38 patients with two-vessel disease. Exercise-induced ischaemia (chest pain and/or greater than 1 mm ST segment change) occurred in 100 per cent of left main, 69 per cent of three-vessel, and 45 per cent of two-vessel disease patients. Though the mean peak work load was significantly higher in the two-vessel disease group than in those with three-vessel of left main disease, there was a wide overlap between groups. No intergroup differences were found in mean peak heart rates. In patients taking propranolol, no differences in mean peak work loads and heart rates were seen. The study showed that the absence of an exercise-induced abnormal electrocardiographic response virtually excludes left main disease. As judged by exercise performance, the presence of left main disease did not correlate with the severity of the patient's symptomatology. Propranolol did not influence the frequency of an ischaemic response in patients with left main or three-vessel disease.

Treatment of premature ventricular complexes with acebutolol

The effect of intravenous acebutolol versus saline solution on frequent premature ventricular complexes was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized study in 20 patients, including 3 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Frequent premature ventricular complexes were abolished or reduced by 75% or more in none of 12 patients given saline solution but in 18 of 20 patients (90%) given acebutolol (P less than 0.001). This therapeutic effect of acebutolol persisted for at least 2.5 hours in 17 of 20 patients (85%), for at least 3.5 hours in 14 (70%) and for at least 4 hours in 8 (40%). Acebutolol was well tolerated by the three patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These data indicate that intravenous acebutolol is useful in the treatment of premature ventricular complexes.

Ventricular tachycardia due to cardiac ischaemia: assessment by exercise electrocardiography

Although ventricular tachycardia is a well-known complication of myocardial ischaemia and may be provoked by exercise, many patients may appreciate only the angina and be unaware of the unduly rapid heart rate that precipitates it. Exercise testing is needed to show this arrhythmia and to enable treatment to be started.Twenty-three patients were found to have chronic ischaemic heart disease complicated by ventricular tachycardia. Six patients with old myocardial infarction had ventricular tachycardia at rest which required conversion to sinus rhythm; 17 patients developed ventricular tachycardia only when they exercised. In 12 of these 17 patients coronary angiography showed disease of the anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery; other vessels were usually also affected. Although beta-adrenergic blocking drugs increased exercise tolerance, ventricular tachycardia still occurred when the heart rate on exercise reached a level similar to that before treatment. In five patients coronary artery bypass surgery was performed because of angina and exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia. Exercise tolerance was increased in all three patients who underwent exercise tests after operation, and in two of these patients, both of whom were known to have patent grafts, ventricular tachycardia was abolished.If part of the beneficial effect of coronary bypass surgery is preventing life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias it is essential to detect these, and ambulatory monitoring and stress testing have a complementary role.