A double-blind randomized trial of propranolol and verapamil in the treatment of effort angina

Discovery and Development of Calcium Channel Blockers

In the mid 1960s, experimental work on molecules under screening as coronary dilators allowed the discovery of the mechanism of calcium entry blockade by drugs later named calcium channel blockers. This paper summarizes scientific research on these small molecules interacting directly with L-type voltage-operated calcium channels. It also reports on experimental approaches translated into understanding of their therapeutic actions. The importance of calcium in muscle contraction was discovered by Sidney Ringer who reported this fact in 1883. Interest in the intracellular role of calcium arose 60 years later out of Kamada (Japan) and Heibrunn (USA) experiments in the early 1940s. Studies on pharmacology of calcium function were initiated in the mid 1960s and their therapeutic applications globally occurred in the the 1980s. The first part of this report deals with basic pharmacology in the cardiovascular system particularly in isolated arteries. In the section entitled from calcium antagonists to calcium channel blockers, it is recalled that drugs of a series of diphenylpiperazines screened in vivo on coronary bed precontracted by angiotensin were initially named calcium antagonists on the basis of their effect in depolarized arteries contracted by calcium. Studies on arteries contracted by catecholamines showed that the vasorelaxation resulted from blockade of calcium entry. Radiochemical and electrophysiological studies performed with dihydropyridines allowed their cellular targets to be identified with L-type voltage-operated calcium channels. The modulated receptor theory helped the understanding of their variation in affinity dependent on arterial cell membrane potential and promoted the terminology calcium channel blocker (CCB) of which the various chemical families are introduced in the paper. In the section entitled tissue selectivity of CCBs, it is shown that characteristics of the drug, properties of the tissue, and of the stimuli are important factors of their action. The high sensitivity of hypertensive animals is explained by the partial depolarization of their arteries. It is noted that they are arteriolar dilators and that they cannot be simply considered as vasodilators. The second part of this report provides key information about clinical usefulness of CCBs. A section is devoted to the controversy on their safety closed by the Allhat trial (2002). Sections are dedicated to their effect in cardiac ischemia, in cardiac arrhythmias, in atherosclerosis, in hypertension, and its complications. CCBs appear as the most commonly used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. As far as hypertension is concerned, globally the prevalence in adults aged 25 years and over was around 40% in 2008. Usefulness of CCBs is discussed on the basis of large clinical trials. At therapeutic dosage, they reduce the elevated blood pressure of hypertensive patients but don't change blood pressure of normotensive subjects, as was observed in animals. Those active on both L- and T-type channels are efficient in nephropathy. Alteration of cognitive function is a complication of hypertension recognized nowadays as eventually leading to dementia. This question is discussed together with the efficacy of CCBs in cognitive pathology. In the section entitled beyond the cardiovascular system, CCBs actions in migraine, neuropathic pain, and subarachnoid hemorrhage are reported. The final conclusions refer to long-term effects discovered in experimental animals that have not yet been clearly reported as being important in human pharmacotherapy.

Calcium channel antagonists in the management of anginal syndromes: changing concepts in relation to the role of coronary vasospasm

Despite the increasing evidence that alterations in coronary vascular tone can and do occur in patients with anginal syndromes, only in a minority of such patients with Prinzmetal's angina is there decisive evidence that the coronary vasodilation induced by calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) plays a specific therapeutic role. CCAs may also give therapeutic benefit in a number of conditions in which coronary vasoconstriction may contribute to ischemia, such as hyperventilation, cold-induced angina, or silent ischemia not caused by an increase in heart rate. Thus, the decision of whether or not to use CCAs in angina syndromes will often have to be made on grounds other than what appears to be a minor role of vasospasm in the overall spectrum of angina. There are preliminary indications that the long-term prognosis may be different among different categories of CCAs.

Age-response effectiveness of gallopamil for the treatment of myocardial exertional ischemia. A medium-term randomized cross-over double-blind placebo-controlled trial

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gallopamil 150 mg daily in middle-aged and elderly patients with stable exertional ischemia, using a medium-term randomized double-blind cross-over placebo-controlled trial. Twenty middle-aged patients (52.8 +/- 6 years; range 38-61 years) and 14 elderly patients (67.4 +/- 2.8 years; range 65-73 years) with stable exertional ischemia underwent a bicycle exercise test. After a run-in period, both groups received treatment with either placebo or gallopamil 50 mg tid for 28 days. At the end of this time, each patient crossed over to the alternate regimen. Gallopamil significantly reduced heart rate, blood pressure and rate pressure product (from 15.37 +/- 2.7 to 13.65 +/- 4.16 U x 10(-3); p < 0.01) in elderly patients at submaximal exercise, but had no effect in middle-aged patients (from 14.52 +/- 4.45 to 13.49 +/- 3.77 U x 10(-3); p = NS). At peak exercise, none of the hemodynamic parameters was modified with gallopamil in either group. At peak exercise, both middle-aged and elderly patients achieved rate-pressure products similar to those reached during placebo at higher work loads. Exercise duration and maximal work load significantly increased in both groups. Electrocardiographic signs of ischemia were favorably influenced by gallopamil in both groups (from 1.39 +/- 0.5 mm to 0.76 +/- 0.73 mm; p < 0.001 in the middle-aged patients and from 1.5 +/- 0.34 mm to 1 +/- 0.76 mm; p < 0.01 in the elderly patients).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of conventional and sustained-release verapamil in stable angina pectoris

The efficacy of sustained-release (s.r.) verapamil and conventional verapamil were compared in a double blind, crossover study in 20 patients (age 53 +/- SD6 years) who had stable effort angina and had used betablockers and long acting nitrates for at least two weeks. All patients received s.r. verapamil 200 mg b.i.d. and conventional verapamil 120 mg t.i.d. in a randomised order for two weeks. A symptom limited bicycle exercise test was performed at the end of the patients' previous medication period with betablocker plus long acting nitrate and at the end of both verapamil treatments in the morning before drug administration and three hours thereafter. All the patients improved subjectively during both verapamil regimens according to NYHA classification and they had fewer anginal attacks. The time to onset of ST-segment depression during exercise remained shorter during beta-blockade and long acting nitrates than during both verapamil regimens (P less than 0.05). During the peak action three hours after drug administration conventional verapamil was most effective at comparable workloads (P less than 0.05), whereas the exercise time was slightly prolonged with s.r. verapamil before drug administration.

The effects of verapamil on training in patients with ischemic heart disease

Verapamil is a calcium-channel blocking agent with antianginal and antiarrhythmic properties that have been widely studied. Its myocardial depressant effect is well known. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of verapamil on the training response in patients with ischemic heart disease. The study group consisted of 41 male patients with a mean age of 53.3 +/- 7.2 years who had suffered a myocardial infarction or had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery 8 to 12 weeks previously. They were chosen on a consecutive basis from eligible patients entering a cardiac rehabilitation program. With use of a double-blind technique, 21 patients were assigned to receive verapamil, 120 mg three times daily, while the other 20 were given an identical placebo. Each patient underwent exercise stress testing in the untreated state to permit comparison between tests performed on commencement and completion of training. The training effect was determined by comparing exercise response before and after the eight-week program. There was an increase in exercise duration (p less than 0.001) and a decrease in functional aerobic impairment (p less than 0.001), without difference between the two groups. Energy expenditure increased in both groups, but the highest level was achieved by those receiving active treatment (p less than 0.02). Heart rate for equal workload was significantly reduced after training (p less than 0.001), although this was lower in the placebo patients (p less than 0.001) and the patients who had a recent myocardial infarction (p less than 0.01). It appears that treatment with verapamil does not impair the development of a training effect in patients with ischemic heart disease who are undergoing organized training.

Comparison of the antianginal efficacy of four calcium antagonists and propranolol in stable angina pectoris

The antianginal effects of propranolol 160 mg/day, diltiazem 240 mg/day, nicardipine 80 mg/day, nifedipine 40 to 80 mg/day and verapamil 320 mg/day were compared in 12 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris using a symptom-limited exercise test. Compared to placebo propranolol and calcium antagonists similarly reduced (p less than 0.001) the frequency of antianginal attacks and nitroglycerin consumption, and increased exercise tolerance and time to greater than or equal to 1 mm S-T segment depression. After propranolol the pressure-rate product at submaximal and maximal exercise was significantly decreased. The calcium antagonists produced a significant reduction in the submaximal pressure-rate product, but no significant change in the peak pressure-rate product. Maximum ST depression was significantly lower after propranolol and was unchanged after the calcium antagonists. None of the drugs caused significant adverse effects. The results indicate that in patients with stable effort angina pectoris, diltiazem, nicardipine, nifedipine and verapamil were as effective as propranolol in improving exercise tolerance and time to ischaemia, and they did not alter the peak pressure-rate product. Different antianginal mechanisms may be operative for the various calcium antagonists.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part II: Use and comparative properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonists in ischemic heart disease, including recommendations based on an analysis of 41 trials

An analysis of 41 trials of angina of all varieties confirms that calcium antagonists are an important advance and are now established therapy for these syndromes. In effort angina, verapamil in a dose of 360-480 mg daily is better than propranolol in standard doses. Although nifedipine is highly effective against vasospastic angina, its use in threatened myocardial infarction or severe unstable angina is not supported by recent studies, unless combined with a beta-blocker. Diltiazem has recently been tested with apparent benefit in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Otherwise, these calcium antagonist agents all seem to have approximate equipotency in clinical ischemic syndromes including effort and vasospastic angina. Subjective side effects seem most troublesome in the case of nifedipine. All three calcium antagonists, especially nifedipine, have been successfully combined with beta-blocker therapy, yet occasional additive negative inotropic or chronotropic or dromotropic interactions may occur when verapamil or diltiazem is added to beta-blockade, and occasionally the direct negative inotropic potential of nifedipine may become evident. The choice between the calcium antagonists is determined not only by the clinical picture but also by the anticipated side effects in a given patient and by the overall cardiovascular status. In patients with supraventricular tachycardias or sinus tachycardia, verapamil or diltiazem is preferred, whereas in patients with a resting bradycardia or borderline heart failure nifedipine is likely to be chosen.

Calcium channel blockers

The calcium channel blockers initially were approved for the treatment of classical and variant angina pectoris. Recent studies indicate that these agents also are useful in such diverse conditions as pulmonary and systemic hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, asthma, Raynaud's syndrome, esophageal spasm, myometrial hyperactivity, cerebral arterial spasm, and migraine.

Effect of propranolol and verapamil on oxygen utilization, acidosis and fatigue during exercise in stable angina pectoris

Oxygen utilization, arterial and venous blood gas levels, hemodynamic values and exercise tolerance were compared before and after administration of propranolol and verapamil in 10 patients with stable angina pectoris. During exercise, propranolol decreased cardiac output (CO) by 22%; O2 extraction was increased and O2 consumption (VO2) did not change. With verapamil treatment, CO modestly increased (7%), O2 extraction decreased and VO2 did not change. In contrast to O2 utilization, the drugs produced opposite changes in mixed venous and arterial blood gas levels. Propranolol decreased mixed venous pH, increased CO2 tension and decreased the pH of arterial blood. Verapamil increased venous pH and decreased CO2 tension; pH of arterial blood did not change. The drugs yielded similar levels of antianginal efficacy, but patients exercised longer during verapamil therapy and were less fatigued. The hemodynamic and metabolic differences suggest that muscle perfusion during exercise influences the onset of fatigue and may help determine the choice of therapy.

Efficacy of nisoldipine combined with beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs in the treatment of chronic stable angina

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess whether a new calcium antagonist, nisoldipine, in doses of either 5 mg or 10 mg daily, in combination with beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs (combination therapy) was more effective than beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs alone (single therapy) in the treatment of chronic stable angina. Treatments were assessed at two-week intervals, using exercise electrocardiography and patients' anginal diaries. A significant improvement in exercise capacity and reduction in anginal attacks occurred only during nisoldipine (10 mg daily) combination therapy compared with single therapy. Mean exercise time increased from 419 +/- 146 s (single) to 454 +/- 158 s (p less than 0.02) after combination therapy. Exercise time to onset of 1 mm ST-segment depression improved from 326 +/- 145 s (single) to 331 +/- 139 s after combination therapy, although the change was not significant. Mean number of anginal attacks decreased from 21 +/- 22 (single to 15 +/- 19 (p less than 0.01) during combination treatment, with an associated significant reduction in glyceryl trinitrate consumption. Adverse effects during combined therapy were minor and tolerable. Thus patients limited by exertional angina despite beta-adrenergic-blocking drugs may obtain supplemental relief of angina and myocardial ischemia with the addition of nisoldipine in a dose of 10 mg daily.

A double blind placebo controlled comparison of verapamil, atenolol, and their combination in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris

The efficacy and effect on cardiac function of verapamil 120 mg three times a day and atenolol 100 mg once a day, singly and in combination, were evaluated in 15 patients with angina pectoris. While they were on the combination treatment four patients withdrew from the study. Episodes of angina pectoris and glyceryl trinitrate consumption were significantly reduced only on the combination. On the combination only four patients developed evidence of ischaemia during exercise compared with seven on verapamil and ten on atenolol. ST segment depression at peak exercise, assessed by 16 point precordial mapping, was reduced by all active treatments from 7.1 on placebo to 2.7, 0.9, and 0.6 mm on atenolol, verapamil, and the combination respectively. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction fell significantly from 60% on placebo to 53% on the combination but was unchanged on verapamil and atenolol. Verapamil was an effective alternative to atenolol; the combination was the most effective treatment but was associated with a significant morbidity.

Improved left ventricular performance during exercise with verapamil or nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina

To examine the effects of chronic oral therapy with verapamil, 120 mg three times a day, and nifedipine, 20 mg four times daily, on left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion at rest and exercise, 10 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris underwent serial rest and exercise radionuclide angiography. Pre drug control study revealed a resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 0.62 +/- 0.08, falling to 0.54 +/- 0.12 at peak exercise (p less than 0.05). Wall motion score deteriorated from a resting value of 13.8 +/- 2.3 to 10.6 +/- 1.8 (p less than 0.01) with exercise. Patients were subsequently randomized to verapamil or nifedipine for 4 weeks each in an open-labeled crossover design. Rest and exercise radionuclide angiography were repeated at the end of each 4-week period. Neither verapamil nor nifedipine had a significant effect on resting LVEF (verapamil LVEF = 0.61 +/- 0.10, nifedipine LVEF = 0.64 +/- 0.02). Likewise, they had no significant effect on resting wall motion score (verapamil = 14.2 +/- 2.2, nifedipine = 14.4 +/- 1.6). Both verapamil and nifedipine significantly increased LVEF at peak exercise (verapamil = 0.63 +/- 0.09, nifedipine = 0.65 +/- 0.08, p less than 0.05 vs pre drug control) and improved peak exercise wall motion score (verapamil = 13 +/- 1.9, nifedipine = 13.8 +/- 1.6, p less than 0.05 vs pre drug control). Both drugs significantly reduced maximal ST depression at peak exercise and prolonged exercise duration. Episodes of angina and nitroglycerin use were also significantly reduced. In summary, verapamil and nifedipine improved left ventricular performance at exercise in patients with angina pectoris.

Efficacy of sustained-release verapamil in chronic stable angina pectoris

The effectiveness of a sustained-release preparation of verapamil (verapamil-SR) was compared with the regular formulation of verapamil and with placebo in 12 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. All patients completed an 8-week, double-blind, double-crossover, randomized protocol with 2-week treatment periods of verapamil-SR, 240 mg twice daily; regular-formulation verapamil, 120 mg 4 times daily; and 2 placebo therapies. The frequency of weekly anginal episodes was reduced from 7.6 +/- 10.0 with placebo to 3.1 +/- 4.2 after the regular formulation of verapamil (p = 0.09) and from 6.4 +/- 7.6 with placebo to 2.8 +/- 4.8 after verapamil-SR (p = 0.06). Treadmill time increased from 384 +/- 144 seconds during the first placebo phase to 468 +/- 138 seconds after the regular formulation of verapamil (p less than 0.01) and from 354 +/- 102 seconds during the second placebo phase to 462 +/- 138 seconds after verapamil-SR (p less than 0.01). Time to the onset of angina was similarly prolonged by formulations of verapamil. There were no significant adverse effects after 1 year in any patient taking verapamil-SR, 240 mg twice daily. Thus, a twice-a-day verapamil-SR dose regimen is safe and is as effective for treatment of angina of effort as the regular formulation given 4 times a day.

Studies on ergometer exercise testing. II. Effect of previous myocardial infarction, digoxin, and beta-blockade on exercise electrocardiography

The results of exercise electrocardiography were studied in a random sample of 317 subjects with clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease. In 278 patients with coronary artery disease the rate of false negative tests was 18% with and 12% without previous myocardial infarction. If ST elevation was considered a negative response, the corresponding values were 25% and 13%, respectively, p less than 0.01. The greatest prevalence of negative tests was seen after anterior myocardial infarction: 27% or 42% when ST elevation was not included into positive responses. The sensitivity of exercise-induced ST depression for the presence of multivessel disease was lower after anterior infarction (67%) than in other patients with previous infarction (86%), p less than 0.01. The corresponding specificities were 71% and 22%, respectively, p less than 0.005. If ST elevation was included into positive responses these differences were abolished. In subjects without myocardial infarction the sensitivity was 89% and specificity 43%. Digitalized patients had somewhat higher sensitivity in the exercise electrocardiogram than those without digoxin, 90% vs. 81% (p less than 0.05), but the difference was not seen with exclusion of ST elevation. The specificity was not influenced by digitalis. beta-blockade had no effect on the sensitivity or specificity, but the prevalence of postexercise ST evolution was lower with (11%) than without (30%) beta-blockade. The prevalence of slowly ascending ST depression was reduced by three factors: the presence of digitalis in patients without previous myocardial infarction, infarction itself, and the extent of coronary artery disease. We conclude that exercise electrocardiography has only a limited value in prediction of multivessel disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of esmolol on cardiac function: evaluation by noninvasive techniques

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, the effects of esmolol and propranolol were examined at rest and during peak upright exercise in 15 patients. At rest, both esmolol and propranolol significantly decreased heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rate-pressure product, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index and right ventricular ejection fraction. During exercise, significant decreases were also found in heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac index in both treatment groups. No significant differences were found between mean esmolol and mean propranolol measurements at rest and during exercise, except for the exercise systolic blood pressure, which was lower during esmolol infusion. Blood levels of esmolol decreased markedly by 30 minutes postinfusion, as did its beta-blocking action. Esmolol was well tolerated with no important local, systemic or laboratory abnormalities. Thus, the effects of esmolol on cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise are similar to those of propranolol.

Evaluation of bepridil for the treatment of angina pectoris: evidence for preservation of left ventricular function

The efficacy of bepridil (400 mg once a day) was assessed in 15 patients with exertional angina pectoris. All 15 patients reported substantial clinical improvement during bepridil treatment compared with placebo treatment. Episodes of angina were 11.8 +/- 4.1 (mean +/- standard error of the mean)/week with placebo and 3.8 +/- 1.6 with bepridil (p less than 0.05); nitroglycerin use was 9.1 +/- 3.3 tablets/week with placebo and 3.5 +/- 1.7 with bepridil (p less than 0.05). Five of 15 patients receiving bepridil did not experience angina during treadmill exercise; in the remaining 10 patients, time to onset of angina during exercise was 5.7 +/- 0.9 minutes with bepridil as opposed to 4.5 +/- 0.8 minutes with placebo (p less than 0.05). Left ventricular (LV) performance at peak exercise as measured by first-pass radionuclide angiography revealed the ejection fraction to be 38 +/- 3% during placebo therapy and 47 +/- 4% during bepridil therapy (p less than 0.0025). End-diastolic LV volume was unchanged, but end-systolic volume was 136 +/- 11 and 117 +/- 13 ml (p less than 0.05) and stroke volume was 82 +/- 6 and 97 +/- 9 ml (p less than 0.05) during placebo and bepridil therapy, respectively. Heart rate at peak exercise was 136 +/- 3 beats/min with placebo and 128 +/- 3 beats/min with bepridil; however, blood pressure was unchanged. These studies demonstrate that bepridil results in significant clinical improvement and enhanced LV performance in patients with angina pectoris.

Improved exercise tolerance after propranolol, diltiazem or nifedipine in angina pectoris: comparison at 1, 3 and 8 hours and correlation with plasma drug concentration

Exercise tolerance 1, 3 and 8 hours after 80 mg of propranolol, 120 mg of diltiazem and 20 mg of nifedipine, and after 20 minutes of 0.6 mg of sublingual nitroglycerin were compared with placebo in 15 men who had chronic stable angina pectoris. Three hours after drug ingestion, the exercise time was prolonged by 72 +/- 26, 162 +/- 27 and 161 +/- 30 seconds (p less than 0.05) for propranolol, diltiazem and nifedipine, respectively, and by 123 +/- 35 seconds (p less than 0.001) 20 minutes after sublingual nitroglycerin compared with placebo. The onset of ST-segment depression greater than or equal to 0.1 mV was delayed by 120 +/- 34, 203 +/- 29 and 189 +/- 35 seconds (p less than 0.05) and by 79 +/- 23 seconds (p less than 0.05), respectively. After propranolol, the peak rate-pressure product decreased compared with placebo (15.1 +/- 1.1 U [10(-3)] vs 20.0 +/- 1.5 U, p less than 0.01). In contrast, the peak rate-pressure product was greater after diltiazem and nifedipine than after placebo (22.2 +/- 1.3 U [p less than 0.05] and 23.8 +/- 1.4 U [p less than 0.01]). The maximal increase in exercise tolerance was most marked for each drug at 3 hours, but was also significant at 1 hour for nifedipine and at 8 hours for diltiazem. At 3 hours, an increase in exercise time of more than 2 minutes was observed in 4 of 6 patients who had plasma propranolol concentrations greater than 40 ng/ml, 8 of 9 who had a plasma diltiazem concentration greater than 150 ng/ml, and in 7 of 7 who had a plasma nifedipine concentration greater than 90 ng/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluation of left ventricular function by radionuclide angiography during exercise in normal subjects and in patients with chronic coronary heart disease

Radionuclide angiography permits evaluation of left ventricular performance during exercise. There are several factors that may affect the results in normal subjects and in patients with chronic coronary heart disease. Important among these are the selection criteria: age, sex, level of exercise, exercise end points, ejection fraction at rest and effects of pharmacologic agents. An abnormal ejection fraction response to exercise is not a specific marker for coronary heart disease but may be encountered in other cardiac diseases. In addition to the diagnostic considerations, important prognostic data can be obtained. Further studies are needed to determine the prognostic implications of anatomic findings versus the functional abnormalities induced by exercise in patients with coronary artery disease.

Clinical applications of slow channel blocking compounds

The slow-channel blockers constitute a structurally diverse group of drugs with varying mechanisms of action, propensities for site of greatest cardiovascular activity, and clinical efficacy. They share however the property of blocking the slow inward channel in heart muscle and of inhibiting calcium fluxes in smooth muscle. Their in vivo and in vitro actions must be distinguished. The overall actions represent a balance of direct and autonomically-mediated reflex actions interacting with the compounds' varying degrees of intrinsic non-competitive sympathetic antagonism. A knowledge of the pharmacodynamic differences between these drugs allows the physician to select the most appropriate agent for a given clinical situation. The central role of calcium in the cellular processes in the heart and the vascular system forms the basis for the utility of this class of drugs in a wide variety of cardiovascular disorders. Current intensive experimental and clinical investigations are likely to further define the roles of nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem and their congeners in cardiovascular therapeutics. The prospect of development of newer compounds with greater selectivity of action is real. As pointed out by Braunwald (1982 a,b), with further clarification of the mechanisms of actions of these compounds and elucidation of the role of calcium fluxes throughout the body, more specific and potent agents may be developed. The apparent efficacy of the nifedipine congener nimodipine, in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (Allen et al., 1983) may simply be the first of a large number of 'specific' or targeted slow channel blockers. The development of such compounds may offer further therapeutic possibilities in the control of a variety of cardiocirculatory diseases.