Termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with a single oral dose of diltiazem and propranolol

Rationale and design of the NODE-303 study: evaluating the safety of symptom-prompted, self-administered etripamil for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia episodes in real-world settings

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common episodic arrhythmia characterized by unpredictable onset and burdensome symptoms including palpitations, dizziness, chest pain, distress, and shortness of breath. Treatment of acute episodes of PSVT in the clinical setting consists of intravenous adenosine, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Etripamil is an intranasally self-administered L-type CCB in development for acute treatment of AV-nodal dependent PSVT in a nonmedical supervised setting.

METHODS

This paper summarizes the rationale and study design of NODE-303 that will assess the efficacy and safety of etripamil. In the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 RAPID trial, etripamil was superior to placebo in the conversion of single PSVT episodes by 30 minutes post initial dose when administered in the nonhealthcare setting; this study required a mandatory and observed test dosing prior to randomization. The primary objective of NODE-303 is to evaluate the safety of symptom-prompted, self-administered etripamil for multiple PSVT episodes in real-world settings, without the need for test dosing prior to first use during PSVT. Secondary endpoints include efficacy and disease burden. Upon perceiving a PSVT episode, the patient applies an electrocardiographic monitor, performs a vagal maneuver, and, if the vagal maneuver is unsuccessful, self-administers etripamil 70 mg, with an optional repeat dose if symptoms do not resolve within 10 minutes after the first dose. A patient may treat up to four PSVT episodes during the study. Adverse events are recorded as treatment-emergent if they occur within 24 hours after the administration of etripamil.

RESULTS

Efficacy endpoints include time to conversion to sinus rhythm within 30 and 60 minutes after etripamil administration, and the proportion of patients who convert at 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes. Patient-reported outcomes are captured by the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire, the Short Form Health Survey 36, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and a PSVT survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these data will support the development of a potentially paradigm-changing long-term management strategy for recurrent PSVT.

Podcast on Self-administered Intranasal Etripamil for Symptomatic Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia: The RAPID Trial

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is commonly seen in clinical practice and represents a significant burden to the healthcare system and to patients. First-line treatments include calcium channel blockers (CCB), although they are intravenous and require medical supervision. Etripamil is an investigational self-administered intranasal L-type CCB for unsupervised treatment of PSVT. In this podcast, we discuss the RAPID trial (NCT03464019), which was a phase 3 study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of etripamil in terminating PSVT episodes using a repeat-dosing regimen. RAPID was a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled adults with electrocardiograph (ECG)-documented PSVT episodes lasting ≥ 20 min. Patients who tolerated test doses of etripamil were randomized 1:1 to receive either etripamil or placebo. Upon perceiving PSVT symptoms, patients began ECG monitoring and performed a vagal maneuver. If arrhythmia termination was unsuccessful, they self-administered 70 mg of etripamil or placebo, followed by an optional second dose after 10 min. The primary endpoint was time to conversion of PSVT to sinus rhythm within 30 min of the initial dose and sustained for ≥ 30 s. The safety group included all patients who self-administered the study treatment. Of 692 enrollees, 184 self-administered the study drug (99 etripamil, 85 placebo) for ECG-confirmed PSVT. Conversion of PSVT to sinus rhythm within 30 min was achieved in 64.3% of etripamil-treated subjects versus 31.2% of placebo-treated subjects. A significant threefold reduction in the median time to conversion of 17.2 min was observed in the etripamil group versus 53.5 min in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and primarily included transient nasal discomfort, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea. If etripamil is approved by the US FDA, it can potentially address a significant unmet need for PSVT treatment outside a clinical setting, reducing the need for intravenous treatments that require medical supervision.Podcast available for this article.

Etripamil Nasal Spray for Conversion of Repeated Spontaneous Episodes of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia During Long-Term Follow-Up: Results From the NODE-302 Study

Background Self-administration of investigational intranasal L-type calcium channel blocker etripamil during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) appeared safe and well-tolerated in the phase 3 NODE-301 (Multi-Centre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy, and Safety Study of Etripamil Nasal Spray for the Termination of Spontaneous Episodes of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia) trial of adults with sustained atrioventricular nodal-dependent PSVT. The NODE-302 open-label extension further characterized etripamil safety and efficacy. Methods and Results Eligible patients were monitored via self-applied cardiac monitoring system for 5 hours after etripamil self-administration. The primary end point was time-to-conversion of positively adjudicated PSVT to sinus rhythm after etripamil treatment. Probability of conversion to sinus rhythm was reported via Kaplan-Meier plot. Adverse events were based on self-reported symptoms and clinical evaluations. Among 169 patients enrolled, 105 self-administered etripamil ≥1 time for perceived PSVT (median [range], 232 [8-584] days' follow-up). Probability of conversion within 30 minutes of etripamil was 60.2% (median time to conversion, 15.5 minutes) among 188 PSVT episodes (92 patients) positively adjudicated as atrioventricular nodal dependent by independent ECG analysis. Among 40 patients who self-treated 2 episodes, 75% had a significantly consistent response by 30 minutes; 9 did not convert on either episode, and 21 converted on both episodes (χ2=8.09; P=0.0045). Forty-five of 105 patients (42.9%) had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, generally transient and mild-to-moderate, including nasal congestion (14.3%), nasal discomfort (14.3%), or rhinorrhea (12.4%). No serious cardiac safety events were observed within 24 hours of etripamil. Conclusions In this extension study, investigational etripamil nasal spray was well tolerated for self-treating recurrent episodes of PSVT without medical supervision. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03635996.

Self-administered intranasal etripamil using a symptom-prompted, repeat-dose regimen for atrioventricular-nodal-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (RAPID): a multicentre, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Etripamil is a fast-acting, intranasally administered calcium-channel blocker in development for on-demand therapy outside a health-care setting for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etripamil 70 mg nasal spray using a symptom-prompted, repeat-dose regimen for acute conversion of atrioventricular-nodal-dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm within 30 min.

METHODS

RAPID was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial, conducted at 160 sites in North America and Europe as part 2 of the NODE-301 study. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had a history of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia with sustained, symptomatic episodes (≥20 min) as documented by electrocardiogram. Patients were administered two test doses of intranasal etripamil (each 70 mg, 10 min apart) during sinus rhythm; those who tolerated the test doses were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive response technology system to receive either etripamil or placebo. Prompted by symptoms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, patients self-administered a first dose of intranasal 70 mg etripamil or placebo and, if symptoms persisted beyond 10 min, a repeat dose. Continuously recorded electrocardiographic data were adjudicated, by individuals masked to patient assignment, for the primary endpoint of time to conversion of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm for at least 30 s within 30 min after the first dose, which was measured in all patients who administered blinded study drug for a confirmed atrioventricular-nodal-dependent event. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who self-administered blinded study drug for an episode of perceived paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03464019, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 13, 2020, and July 20, 2022, among 692 patients randomly assigned, 184 (99 from the etripamil group and 85 from the placebo group) self-administered study drug for atrioventricular-nodal-dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, with diagnosis and timing confirmed. Kaplan-Meier estimates of conversion rates by 30 min were 64% (63/99) with etripamil and 31% (26/85) with placebo (hazard ratio 2·62; 95% CI 1·66-4·15; p<0·0001). Median time to conversion was 17·2 min (95% CI 13·4-26·5) with the etripamil regimen versus 53·5 min (38·7-87·3) with placebo. Prespecified sensitivity analyses of the primary assessment were conducted to test robustness, yielding supporting results. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 68 (50%) of 99 patients treated with etripamil and 12 (11%) of 85 patients in the placebo group, most of which were located at the administration site and were mild or moderate, and all of which were transient and resolved without intervention. Adverse events occurring in at least 5% of patients treated with etripamil were nasal discomfort (23%), nasal congestion (13%), and rhinorrhea (9%). No serious etripamil-related adverse events or deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Using a symptom-prompted, self-administered, initial and optional-repeat-dosing regimen, intranasal etripamil was well tolerated, safe, and superior to placebo for the rapid conversion of atrioventricular-nodal-dependent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm. This approach could empower patients to treat paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia themselves outside of a health-care setting, and has the potential to reduce the need for additional medical interventions, such as intravenous medications given in an acute-care setting.

FUNDING

Milestone Pharmaceuticals.

Beta-blockers in cardiac arrhythmias-Clinical pharmacologist's point of view

β-blockers is a vast group of antiarrhythmic drugs which differ in their pharmacokinetic and chemical properties. Some of them block β-adrenergic receptors selectively while the others work non-selectively. Consequently, they reduce the influence of the sympathetic nervous system on the heart, acting negatively inotropic, chronotropic, bathmotropic and dromotropic. Although they have been present in medicine since the beginning of the 1960s, they still play a crucial role in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. They are also first-line group of drugs used to control the ventricular rate in patients with the most common arrhythmia-atrial fibrillation. Previous reports indicate that infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus may constitute an additional risk factor for arrhythmia. Due to the aging of the population in developed countries and the increase in the number of patients with cardiac burden, the number of people suffering from cardiac arrhythmias will increase in the upcoming years. As a result the role of above-mentioned beta-blockers will remain significant. Particularly noteworthy is propranolol-the oldest beta adrenergic antagonist, which in recent years has found additional applications due to its unique properties. In this article, we reviewed the accessible literature and summarized the current guidelines on the use of beta-blockers in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

Etripamil Nasal Spray for Rapid Conversion of Supraventricular Tachycardia to Sinus Rhythm

BACKGROUND

There is no nonparenteral medication for the rapid termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of etripamil nasal spray, a short-acting calcium-channel blocker, for the rapid termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).

METHODS

This phase 2 study was performed during electrophysiological testing in patients with previously documented SVT who were induced into SVT prior to undergoing a catheter ablation. Patients in sustained SVT for 5 min received either placebo or 1 of 4 doses of active compound. The primary endpoint was the SVT conversion rate within 15 min of study drug administration. Secondary endpoints included time to conversion and adverse events.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were dosed. Conversion rates from SVT to sinus rhythm were between 65% and 95% in the etripamil nasal spray groups and 35% in the placebo group; the differences were statistically significant (Pearson chi-square test) in the 3 highest active compound dose groups versus placebo. In patients who converted, the median time to conversion with etripamil was <3 min. Adverse events were mostly related to the intranasal route of administration or local irritation. Reductions in blood pressure occurred predominantly in the highest etripamil dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Etripamil nasal spray rapidly terminated induced SVT with a high conversion rate. The safety and efficacy results of this study provide guidance for etripamil dose selection for future studies involving self-administration of this new intranasal calcium-channel blocker in a real-world setting for the termination of SVT. (Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal MSP-2017 [Etripamil] for the Conversion of PSVT to Sinus Rhythm [NODE-1]; NCT02296190).

Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a randomized, controlled trial

AIMS

To conduct a randomized trial in order to guide the optimum therapy of symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with at least one symptomatic episode of tachycardia per month and an electrophysiologic diagnosis of AVNRT were randomly assigned to catheter ablation or chronic antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy with bisoprolol (5 mg od) and/or diltiazem (120-300 mg od). All patients were properly educated to treat subsequent tachycardia episodes with autonomic manoeuvres or a 'pill in the pocket' approach. The primary endpoint of the study was hospital admission for persistent tachycardia cardioversion, during a follow-up period of 5 years. Sixty-one patients were included in the study. In the ablation group, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 29 were free of arrhythmia or conduction disturbances at a 5-year follow-up. In the AAD group, three patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remainder, 10 patients (35.7%) continued with initial therapy, 11 patients (39.2%) remained on diltiazem alone, and 7 patients (25%) interrupted their therapy within the first 3 months following randomization, and subsequently developed an episode requiring cardioversion. During a follow-up of 5 years, 21 patients in the AAD group required hospital admission for cardioversion. Survival free from the study endpoint was significantly higher in the ablation group compared with the AAD group (log-rank test, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is ineffective and not well tolerated.

Advances in the Management of Tachyarrhythmias

Recent developments of both diagnostic and therapeu tic techniques in the management of tachyarrhythmias have broadened the options available to physicians car ing for patients with tachyarrhythmias. Newer diag nostic methods allow more precise identification of the arrhythmia and better understanding of its mechanism. Long-term epidemiologic studies have identified groups of patients who do and do not require antiarrhythmic therapy. Antitachycardia pacemakers and automatic im plantable defibrillators allow effective treatment for pa tients for whom drugs were ineffective or in whom in tolerable side effects developed. Finally, several new antiarrhythmic agents have become available recently. Proper use of these new techniques and drugs requires greater understanding of the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias.

Executive Summary: European Heart Rhythm Association Consensus Document on the Management of Supraventricular Arrhythmias: Endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE)

This paper is an executive summary of the full European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, published in Europace. It summarises developments in the field and provides recommendations for patient management, with particular emphasis on new advances since the previous European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The EHRA consensus document is available to read in full at http://europace.oxfordjournals.org.

Oral verapamil in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia recurrence control: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is the first-line medication in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Because it is cleared so rapidly from the circulation, recurrence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after initial successful conversion may occur.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the role of oral verapamil administration to control early recurrences of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after adenosine infusion.

METHODS

Patients with acute paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and no contraindications for adenosine or verapamil treatment were included in study. All patients received an adenosine protocol (6 mg rapid bolus intravenous injection followed by two repeated doses of 12 mg if necessary). Patients in the adenosine-only group did not received any other medications but patients in the adenosine/verapamil group received 40 mg verapamil orally immediately after converting the rhythm to sinus rhythm. All patients were followed up for 6 h in the acute care area of the emergency department under continuous cardiac monitoring.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were assessed for eligibility and 92 patients were randomized into two groups (adenosine only versus adenosine/verapamil). There was no statistically significant difference in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia recurrence rate between the two groups in the first 30 min after treatment. Recurrence rate was statistically significantly lower in the adenosine/verapamil group than in the adenosine-only group between 30 and 120 min after treatment and thereafter. Two patients in the adenosine-only group experienced flushing and one patient in the adenosine/verapamil group experienced decreased systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Oral verapamil can decrease paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia recurrence after successful control with intravenous adenosine.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pharmacologic therapy is commonly used for the acute treatment and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and continues to be an important long-term option for some patients. Drug choice depends on the correct diagnosis of the arrhythmia and an understanding of its mechanism. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in the acute and chronic treatment of SVT are reviewed along with their effect on the various types of SVT. Drugs that are well tolerated with minimal side effects are preferred over agents with perhaps more efficacy but higher risk of toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of out-of-hospital self-administered single-dose oral drug treatment in the management of infrequent, well-tolerated paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

We tested the efficacy of two drug treatments, flecainide (F) and the combination ofdiltiazem and propranolol (D/P), administered as a single oral dose for termination of the arrhythmic episodes.

BACKGROUND

Both prophylactic drug therapy and catheter ablation are questionable as first-line treatments in patients with infrequent and well-tolerated episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).

METHODS

Among 42 eligible patients (13% of all screened for SVT) with infrequent (< or =5/year), well-tolerated and long-lasting episodes, 37 were enrolled and 33 had SVT inducible during electrophysiological study. In the latter, three treatments (placebo, F, and D/P) were administered in a random order 5 min after SVT induction on three different days.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred within 2 h in 52%, 61%, and 94% of patients on placebo, F and D/P, respectively (p < 0.001). The conversion time was shorter after D/P (32 +/- 22 min) than after placebo (77 +/- 42 min, p < 0.001) or F (74 +/- 37 min, p < 0.001). Four patients (1 placebo, 1 D/P, and 2 F) had hypotension and four (3 D/P and 1 F) a sinus rate <50 beats/min following SVT interruption. Patients were discharged on a single oral dose of the most effective drug treatment (F or D/P) at time of acute testing. Twenty-six patients were discharged on D/P and five on F. During 17 +/- 12 months follow-up, the treatment was successful in 81% of D/P patients and in 80% of F patients, as all the arrhythmic episodes were interrupted out-of-hospital within 2 h. In the remaining patients, a failure occurred during one or more episodes because of drug ineffectiveness or drug unavailability. One patient had syncope after D/P ingestion. During follow-up, the percentage of patients calling for emergency room assistance was significantly reduced as compared to the year before enrollment (9% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The episodic treatment with oral D/P and F, as assessed during acute testing, appears effective in the management of selected patients with SVT. This therapeutic strategy minimizes the need for emergency room admissions during tachycardia recurrences.

Clinical and electrophysiologic effects of dofetilide in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

The clinical and electrophysiologic effect of intravenous dofetilide was evaluated in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) of recent onset (< 7 days) and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). From 2.5 to 5.0 micrograms/kg of dofetilide was administered intravenously for the termination of arrhythmias. For the electrophysiologic study (EPS), 3.0 micrograms for loading and subsequently 2 micrograms/kg was injected for 45 min as a maintenance dose. The EPSs were performed before the loading and during the maintenance dose. AF was successfully converted to sinus rhythm in seven (54%) of 13 patients. The duration of AF from its onset was significantly shorter in responders than that of nonresponders (p < 0.05). Dofetilide also terminated PSVT in four of six patients. In the EPS, dofetilide proportionately lengthened the effective refractory period of the atrium, ventricle, and the accessory pathways without slowing of the intracardiac conduction. Dofetilide completely suppressed the induction of PSVT in seven of 13 patients, restricted the induction zone in five, and inhibited perpetuation of the arrhythmia in the remaining one. The cycle length of PSVT remained unchanged after dofetilide. These results imply that the suppression of the development and maintenance of reentrant arrhythmias may result from the lengthening effect of dofetilide on the refractoriness and the consequent elimination of the excitable gap at the critical part of the reentrant loop.

Oral flecainide, sotalol, and verapamil for the termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

The ability to terminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) acutely with an oral dose of flecainide (2.5-3.3 mg/kg), sotalol (2.0-2.9 mg/kg), and verapamil (3.3-3.7 mg/kg) was investigated in an observational study of six patients with SVT normally controlled by an antitachycardia pacemaker. The pacemaker was programmed to induce SVT and the stability of SVT was observed for 90 minutes as a baseline. Subsequent studies involved testing of the three antiarrhythmic drugs on separate occasions, given in random order as crushed tablets in orange juice during pacemaker induced SVT, with plasma drug levels collected every 15 minutes for 90 minutes post drug ingestion. Sotalol produced drug induced slowing of SVT in all six patients, with termination of SVT in three patients by 60-65 minutes, with maximum plasma levels of 0.76-2.09 micrograms/mL achieved by 90 minutes. Flecainide produced maximum plasma levels of 83-745 ng/mL, 60-90 minutes post ingestion, and slowed SVT in three patients. SVT was terminated in three patients after 45-85 minutes, but no effect on SVT was seen in two patients who had inadequate plasma levels (< or = 166 ng/mL) from doses < 3 mg/kg. Verapamil produced maximum plasma levels of 0 (undetectable) to 388 ng/mL, 45-90 minutes post ingestion, and slowed SVT in three patients, but only one of these patients reverted to sinus rhythm (at 40 min). No effect on SVT was seen in three patients due to undetectable plasma levels. We concluded that sotalol (> or = 2 mg/kg) and flecainide (> or = 3 mg/kg) appeared to be suitable oral drugs for termination of SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Flecainide single oral dose for management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in children and young adults

The efficacy of a single oral dose of flecainide to terminate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) was evaluated in 25 children and young adults. The subjects were selected from a group of 35 patients with recurrent attacks of PSVT evaluated by means of electrophysiologic study and intravenous electropharmacologic testing with flecainide. In all 25 patients the induced PSVT was stopped by intravenous flecainide and was then no longer inducible or nonsustained. All patients had normal hearts. At least 48 hours after acute intravenous testing, 25 patients underwent electrophysiologic study with a transesophageal catheter and PSVT was induced in all of them: atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in 16 and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in nine. During stable tachycardia, a single oral dose of flecainide (2.9 +/- 0.3 mg/kg; 2.5 to 3.3 mg/kg) was administered. This approach was effective for termination of PSVT in 22 patients. The mean plasma level of flecainide at cessation of tachycardia was 277 +/- 92 ng/ml (150 to 500 mg/ml). All 22 patients who responded were given a single oral dose of flecainide for recurrences of PSVT during follow-up. During a period of 12 +/- 7 months (2 to 27 months) a total of 134 spontaneous episodes of PSVT were reported, and 127 of these episodes were terminated with periodic management. Thus oral periodic flecainide seems useful for management of PSVT in selected patients.

Repetitive sinoatrial exit block as the major mechanism of drug-provoked long sinus or atrial pause

Prolonged sinus or atrial pause occurred in six patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after drug administration. All six patients had normal sinus node function during control electrophysiologic study; the sinus cycle length ranged from 510 to 900 ms (mean 743 +/- 141) and the longest sinus node recovery time ranged from 800 to 1,230 ms (mean 1,018 +/- 168). A long sinus or atrial pause occurring at the termination of tachycardia or cessation of atrial pacing, ranging from 3,100 to 8,200 ms (mean 6,270 +/- 1,674), was provoked by the administration of various drugs. These included an intravenous bolus injection of adenosine triphosphate (5 mg; one patient), intravenous bolus injection of verapamil (5 mg; one patient), a combination of a single oral dose of diltiazem (120 mg) and propranolol (20 to 40 mg; three patients), oral diltiazem (240 mg/day; one patient) and a combination of oral diltiazem (240 mg/day) and propranolol (160 mg/day; one patient). In five patients, low frequency deflections suggestive of sinus node activity with a cycle length between 620 and 3,500 ms were recorded during pauses. These findings suggest that repetitive sinoatrial exit block was responsible for the pause. Sinus slowing with a long arrest suggesting suppression of sinus automaticity was also noted in three of these five patients; the longest sinus arrest in these three patients was 4,160, 4,800 and greater than 4,910 ms, respectively. The remaining patient with a pause of 6,840 ms had no recordable sinus activity, either reflecting suppression of sinus automaticity or technical failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Usefulness of combined propranolol and verapamil for evaluation of surgical ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections in patients without structural heart disease

Successful surgical ablation of atrioventricular (AV) accessory connections may be confirmed during postoperative electrophysiologic testing by the absence of accessory connection conduction in both the anterograde and retrograde directions. Whereas the former may be readily apparent by examination of the surface electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing, assessment of the latter may be complicated by the frequent presence of enhanced retrograde AV nodal conduction in the postoperative period. Consequently, availability of interventions that selectively affect AV nodal conduction and refractoriness without concomitant effects on accessory connections may be helpful for assessing the success of the surgical procedure. In this study the effects of combined propranolol and verapamil administration on electrophysiologic properties of the AV node and the accessory AV connection were assessed both pre- and postoperatively in 17 patients (12 men and 5 women, mean age 33 years) undergoing surgical ablation of accessory connections. Preoperatively, electrophysiologic characteristics of all but 1 of the accessory AV connections were unaffected by propranolol and verapamil administration. Postoperatively, on the other hand, propranolol and verapamil significantly prolonged both the retrograde AV node effective refractory period (baseline: 272 +/- 34 ms vs after drugs: 384 +/- 70 ms [p less than 0.0001]) and the shortest cycle length maintaining 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction (baseline: 357 +/- 99 ms vs after drugs: 485 +/- 64 ms [p less than 0.0001]). Late postoperative electrophysiologic evaluation (7 +/- 3 weeks) revealed no evidence of residual accessory AV connection conduction, and all patients remain asymptomatic at 21 +/- 10 months follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Calcium channel antagonism and beta blockade in combination--a therapeutic alternative in cardiovascular disorders. A review

Calcium-channel antagonists and beta-adrenergic blocking agents have become important modalities in the cardiovascular therapeutic armamentarium. These drugs are often administered as monotherapy to a wide range of cardiological patients with angina pectoris, hypertension, arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and other diseases. Since within each class these drugs exhibit pharmacologic differences, it follows that their effectiveness varies in different disease states and that they exhibit a wide variety of side effects. In an attempt to optimize therapy, the individual drugs from these two classes can be combined; and the efficaciousness and side-effect profile of various combinations between calcium-channel antagonists and beta blockers are discussed in this review. Recommendations as to which patients may benefit from a combination and as to which patients may be harmed by the combination therapy will be made. Very few studies have compared the safety and efficacy of a single agent with the combination and with placebo in a controlled randomized fashion. To determine which therapy is superior and to determine which combination one should recommend under what circumstances, such placebo-controlled, randomized trials are a necessity, and will hopefully be performed although the complexity is enormous.

Control of cardiac arrhythmias by calcium antagonism

In recent years calcium channel blockers have emerged as a new class of antiarrhythmic agents for the control of certain supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Electrophysiologically, they are heterogeneous but their main action is mediated through a depressant effect on the slow calcium channel in cardiac muscle. In isolated muscle, their actions are modulated by their reflex actions and by their interaction with the autonomic nervous system due to the nonocompetitive adrenergic blocking actions that some of the compounds exhibit. The major agents exerting antiarrhythmic actions are verapamil, diltiazem, gallopamil, tiapamil, and bepridil; the dihydropyridines are devoid of significant electrophysiologic actions in vivo. Calcium antagonists prolong intranodal conduction time, lengthen the effective and functional refractory periods in the AV node, but exert little or no effect on atrial, ventricular, His-Purkinje, or bypass tract conduction or refractoriness (except in the case of bepridil, which has additional electrophysiologic properties). These effects form the basis of the clinical antiarrhythmic effects of this class of agents. The most striking action is the predictable and prompt termination of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia by intravenous verapamil and diltiazem and the slowing of the ventricular response in atrial flutter and fibrillation. These agents may also be of value in the chronic control of ventricular response in atrial flutter and fibrillation; their role in multifocal atrial tachycardia and other ectopic tachycardias is less well defined. Calcium antagonists reverse ischemic ventricular arrhythmias due to coronary artery spasm but exert little or no action in the usual forms of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with severe structural heart disease. They are poor suppressants of premature ventricular contractions. Recent data have established their role in exercise-induced tachycardia occurring in the context of ischemic heart disease; they are also of value in ventricular tachycardia occurring in young subjects developing tachycardia with a right bundle branch block with left axis deviation morphology, an arrhythmia thought to be due to triggered automaticity. The role of calcium antagonists in reducing the incidence of sudden death in the survivors of acute myocardial infarction remains uncertain.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications

The major antihypertensive mechanism of calcium antagonists is by decreasing the systemic vascular resistance, modified by the counter-regulatory responses of the baroreflexes and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In severe hypertension, the concept that calcium overload of the vascular myocyte could precipitate or aggravate peripheral vasoconstriction provides a logical basis for the use of these agents as first choice therapy; nifedipine, especially, has been well tested. As monotherapy for mild to moderate hypertension each of the three first-generation agents compares well with beta-blockers. Calcium antagonists may have a special role in the therapy of certain patient groups (elderly, black) or in those subjects whose life style involves intense physical or mental exertion (hemodynamics better maintained than with beta-blockade) or in patients with early end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy or renal insufficiency. However, the goal blood pressure may not be reached during monotherapy so that drug combinations may be required. Further indications for these compounds are as follows. Verapamil and diltiazem are frequently used in supraventricular tachycardias including acute and chronic atrial fibrillation. In the arrhythmias of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, there is the potential danger of provocation of anterograde conduction. Further indications for calcium antagonists, still under evaluation, include congestive heart failure (controversial), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (verapamil), primary pulmonary hypertension (high doses required), Raynaud's phenomenon (nifedipine and diltiazem effective), peripheral vascular disease (proof not yet documented), cerebral insufficiency and subarachnoid hemorrhage (nimodipine promising), migraine, exertional bronchospasm, renal disease, atherosclerosis (experimental), and primary aldosteronism (nifedipine inhibits aldosterone release). Second-generation agents include dihydropyridines, such as nitrendipine, nicardipine, felodipine, amlodipine, nisoldipine, nimodipine, and isradipine. From these will be selected agents that are longer acting and provide higher vascular selectivity. New preparations of existing agents include slow-release formulations of nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine. Yet caution is required when calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Combination therapy for cardiac arrhythmias

Combinations of antiarrhythmic agents are often used when single agents are ineffective, only partly effective or poorly tolerated. The theoretical and experimental basis for combination therapy for arrhythmias is the dissimilar electrophysiologic properties of antiarrhythmic agents. Until more is known about the mechanism of drug synergism and drug interactions, the experience gained clinically remains essential to our understanding. Published reports contain numerous data on the effectiveness of various combinations of antiarrhythmic agents, including combinations of class I agents, the combination of a class I agent and a beta-blocking agent or amiodarone, and combinations including a calcium-antagonist agent. Adverse drug interactions, however, can occur, and combinations of certain agents must be avoided or used with caution.

Failure of episodic high-dose oral verapamil therapy to convert supraventricular tachycardia: a study of plasma verapamil levels and gastric motility

The practicality of administering large oral doses of verapamil tablets to terminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was investigated in 10 patients. A pilot study in four patients showed that unexpectedly low plasma levels (less than 40 ng/ml) were obtained 60 minutes after administering 160 mg or 240 mg of verapamil during SVT. Nuclear studies in the six other patients showed that fractional liquid gastric emptying times (T) were significantly prolonged in SVT compared to sinus rhythm (SR), p less than 0.05 from T 1/3 onward. Further verapamil absorption studies (200 to 360 mg) performed during SVT and SR in five of six patients showed that peak verapamil levels in four patients in SVT were 23% to 71% lower than in sinus rhythm, where they had peaked at greater than 250 ng/ml 60 minutes post verapamil ingestion, and areas under the plasma concentration time curves were 26% to 100% (mean 67%) less in SVT than in SR for all five patients. SVT was terminated by verapamil in one patient after 40 minutes and the rate of SVT was slowed after 90 minutes in two other patients. Thus plasma verapamil levels are considerably reduced during SVT as compared to SR, and changes in gastric emptying are likely a contributing cause. Since SVT was converted to sinus rhythm in only 1 of 10 patients within 1 hour, large oral doses of verapamil tablets appear unsatisfactory for the episodic treatment of SVT.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral diltiazem for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The electrophysiologic effects and safety of diltiazem administered either intravenously or orally were studied in 14 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome during orthodromic reentrant tachycardia and atrial fibrillation (AF). Anterograde and retrograde effective refractory periods of the accessory pathway did not change significantly from baseline during either i.v. or oral administration. Administration by either route prevented induction of sustained reentrant tachycardia in 8 patients. In 6 patients, the reentrant tachycardia was either nonsustained (2 patients) or sustained at much slower rates than the baseline rates (mean +/- standard deviation, baseline, 290 +/- 41 ms; i.v., 355 +/- 40 ms [p less than 0.001]; and oral, 377 +/- 33 ms [p less than 0.001]). In these patients anterograde atrioventricular conduction was prolonged significantly from the mean baseline value of 163 +/- 36 ms to 212 +/- 35 ms with i.v. administration (p less than 0.005) and 225 +/- 33 ms with oral administration (p less than 0.005). Retrograde conduction via the accessory pathway did not change significantly after administration of diltiazem. The shortest preexcited RR intervals during AF were significantly reduced during i.v. but not during oral administration: control, 327 +/- 47 ms; i.v., 270 +/- 28 ms (p less than 0.001); and oral, 323 +/- 44 ms (difference not significant). In 5 patients AF was sustained for a mean of 20 minutes after i.v. and for 12 minutes after oral administration (p less than 0.20), compared with a baseline mean value of 0.83 minute.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of aqueous diltiazem in healthy humans

Aqueous diltiazem was given to ten healthy male volunteers in a single oral dose of 2.5 mg/kg body weight. Serum diltiazem levels were measured at various intervals up to 24 hours after administration of the drug as were blood pressure, heart rate, and PR interval. The pharmacokinetics followed a one-compartment model in six and two-compartment model in four subjects. The mean distribution half-life in the latter four subjects was 15.8 +/- 3.7 minutes (range, 10.4-18.8 min). In the ten subjects, the peak serum diltiazem level was attained in 20 to 45 minutes (mean, 32.5 +/- 9.5 min) and ranged from 136 to 701 ng/mL (mean, 332 +/- 180 ng/mL). The elimination half-life ranged from 2.8 to 4.8 hours (mean, 3.8 +/- 0.6 hr). The area under the concentration-time curve varied from 508 to 2,245 ng-hr/mL, indicating differing bioavailability. Slight but significant blood pressure reduction was seen only at one to three hours. Changes in heart rate were not significant at any measurement. Transient facial flushing, beginning at ten to 20 minutes after administration, was noted in nine subjects, reflecting the vasodilatory effect of the drug. Significant prolongation (greater than 10%) of PR intervals began at ten minutes in three, at 20 minutes in six, and at 30 minutes in one participant, and progressed to second-degree Wenckebach atrioventricular (AV) block in six subjects 20 to 60 minutes after administration and third-degree AV block in one person 45 minutes after dosing. These AV blocks resolved by the third hour without treatment, and PR prolongation resolved by the fifth to seventh hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of calcium antagonists for cardiac arrhythmias

Calcium antagonists have emerged as a new class of antiarrhythmic agents for the control of certain supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Electrophysiologically, these agents are heterogeneous but their main action is mediated through a depressant effect on the slow calcium channel in cardiac muscle, most readily demonstrated in isolated tissue preparations. In vivo, their actions are modulated by their reflex actions and by their interaction with the autonomic nervous system due to the noncompetitive adrenergic-blocking actions that some of the compounds exhibit. The major agents exerting antiarrhythmic actions are verapamil, diltiazem, gallopamil, tiapamil and bepridil; the dihydropyridines are devoid of electrophysiologic actions in vivo. Calcium antagonists prolong intranodal conduction time, lengthen the effective and functional refractory periods in the atrioventricular node but exert little or no effect on atrial, ventricular, His-Purkinje or bypass tract conduction or refractoriness (except in the case of bepridil, which has additional electrophysiologic properties). These effects form the basis of the clinical antiarrhythmic effects of this class of agents. The most striking action is the predictable and prompt termination of the reentrant supraventricular tachycardia by intravenous verapamil and diltiazem and the slowing of the ventricular response in atrial flutter and fibrillation. These agents may also be of value in the long-term control of ventricular response in atrial flutter and fibrillation; their role in multifocal atrial tachycardia and other ectopic tachycardias is less well defined. Calcium antagonists reverse ischemic ventricular arrhythmias caused by coronary artery spasm but exert little or no action in the usual forms of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with severe structural heart disease. They are poor suppressants of ventricular premature complexes. Recent data have established their role in exercise-induced tachycardia occurring in the context of ischemic heart disease; they are also of value in ventricular tachycardia occurring in young patients who develop tachycardia with a right bundle branch block and left axis deviation morphology, an arrhythmia thought to be due to triggered automaticity.