Mitral valve prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation

Mitral valve prolapse in the general population: the benign nature of echocardiographic features in the Framingham Heart Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the echocardiographic features and associations of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) diagnosed by current two-dimensional echocardiographic criteria in an unselected outpatient sample.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of patients with MVP have emphasized the frequent occurrence of echocardiographic abnormalities such as significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and left atrial (LA) enlargement that are associated with clinical complications. These studies, however, have been limited by the use of hospital-based or referral series.

METHODS

We quantitatively studied all 150 subjects with possible MVP by echocardiography and 150 age- and gender-matched subjects without MVP from the 3,491 subjects in the Framingham Heart Study. Based on leaflet morphology, subjects were classified as having classic (n = 46), nonclassic (n = 37), or no MVP.

RESULTS

Leaflet length, MR degree, and LA and left ventricular size were significantly but mildly increased in MVP (p < 0.0001 to 0.004), with mean values typically within normal range. Average MR jet area was 15.1 +/- 1.4% (mild) in classic MVP and 8.9 +/- 1.5% (trace) in nonclassic MVP; MR was severe in only 3 of 46 (6.5%) subjects with classic MVP, and LA volume was increased in only 8.7% of those with classic MVP and 2.7% of those with nonclassic MVP.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the echocardiographic characteristics of subjects with MVP in the Framingham Heart Study differ from those without MVP, they display a far more benign profile of associated valvular, atrial, and ventricular abnormalities than previously reported in hospital- or referral-based series. Therefore, these findings may influence the perception of and approach to the outpatient with MVP.

Identification of high-risk and low-risk subgroups of patients with mitral-valve prolapse

Mitral-valve prolapse is a common cardiac valvular disorder with a wide range of severity and diverse clinical outcomes. The lack of a standard definition of mitral-valve prolapse may explain the variation in reported complication rates. To identify high-risk and low-risk subgroups, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and two-dimensional echocardiographic data from 456 patients with mitral-valve prolapse. Mitral-valve prolapse was defined on the basis of echocardiographic findings as systolic displacement into the left atrium of one or both leaflets beyond the plane of the mitral annulus in the parasternal long-axis view. Two groups of patients were compared: those with thickening of the mitral-valve leaflets and redundancy (designated the classic form; n = 319) and those without leaflet thickening (designated the nonclassic form; n = 137). The two groups were similar in age and sex ratio. Complications or a history of complications was more prevalent in the classic than the nonclassic form: infective endocarditis, 3.5 percent and 0 percent, respectively (P less than 0.02); moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation, 12 percent and 0 percent (P less than 0.001); and the need for mitral-valve replacement, 6.6 percent and 0.7 percent (P less than 0.02). However, the frequency of stroke was similar in the two groups: 7.5 percent and 5.8 percent (P not significant). We conclude that in a selected population of patients with mitral-valve prolapse, those with the classic form (leaflet thickening and redundancy) are at higher risk than those without these features for the infectious and hemodynamic complications of mitral-valve prolapse, but not for stroke.