Efficacy of automatic multimodal device therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias as delivered by a new implantable pacing cardioverter-defibrillator. Results of a European multicenter study of 102 implants

[History of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in Germany]

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was a breakthrough in the prevention of sudden cardiac death. After years of technical development in the USA, Michel Mirowski succeeded in proving reliable automatic defibrillation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias through initial human implantations in 1980, despite many obstacles. Nearly 4 years later, the first patients received ICDs at multiple centers in Germany. Subsequently, outside the USA, Germany became the country with highest implantation rates. The absolute number of implantations remained small as long as implantations required epicardial defibrillation electrodes and therefore thoracotomy by cardiac surgeons. Pacemaker-like implantation using a transvenous defibrillation electrode with a pectoral ICD became feasible in the early 1990s pushing implantation rates to the next level. Technical advancements were accompanied by clinical research in Germany, and often, the first-in-human studies were conducted in Germany. In 1991, the first guidelines for indications were established in the USA and Germany. Several randomized studies on indications were published between 1996 and 2009, mostly led by American teams with German participation, but also under German leadership (CASH, CAT, DINAMIT, IRIS). The DANISH study in 2016 questioned the results of these long-standing studies. Instead of providing ICDs to patients using a broad indication, future efforts aim to identify patients who, despite optimal medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and/or catheter ablation, need protection against sudden cardiac death. Risk scores incorporating myocardial scars in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetic information are expected to contribute to more individualized and effective indications.

Development of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent transformational technology, arguably the most significant advance in cardiovascular medicine in 50 years. The vision and determination of pioneers Mirowski and Mower was fundamental to this monumental achievement, working with limited resources and confronted by skepticism/criticism from medical establishment. The inventors were followed >35 years in which a multitude of innovative clinical scientists and engineers introduced technological advances leading to the sophisticated devices in practice today. A pivotal patient experiment with automated termination of ventricular fibrillation (1980) led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Transvenous lead systems converted ICDs from thoracotomy-based secondary prevention to primary prevention of sudden death devices in countless patients worldwide. ICD acceptance was solidified by prospective randomized controlled trials showing reduced mortality superior to antiarrhythmic drugs. ICDs eventually expanded from coronary disease to inherited arrhythmia conditions (eg, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). The ICD breakthrough story demonstrates how significant progress is possible in medicine against all odds, given fearless imagination to pursue novel ideas that conflict with accepted wisdom.

Clinical predictors of antitachycardia pacing response in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients

BACKGROUND

Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) provides safe and painless termination of reentrant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs), improving their quality of life. Established predictors of ATP responsiveness are not well known; only longer ventricular tachycardia (VT) cycle length and higher ejection fraction have been found to predict ATP success.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clinical and ECG predictors of ATP response in ICD patients with monomorphic VT.

METHODS

The ICD clinic database was searched for monomorphic VT events requiring ICD therapy in patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Each patient's first ICD encounter for VT was assessed. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, VT rate, and ATP responsiveness (always, sometimes, and never successful) were recorded. An ECG was analyzed for QRS morphology and duration. Data was assessed for predictors of ATP responsiveness.

RESULTS

In 527 patients, characteristics associated with always successful ATP included ACE-I/ARB therapy and slower VT rate (never successful ATP 197 ± 28 bpm, sometimes successful ATP 190 ± 27 bpm, always successful ATP 183 ± 22 bpm, P < .0001). Secondary prevention indication, amiodarone therapy, and longer QRS duration were associated with ATP failure. After multivariate analysis, only faster VT rate and amiodarone therapy were predictive of ATP failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither QRS morphology nor duration was predictive of ATP success. Slower VT rate was predictive of repeated ATP responsiveness. Amiodarone therapy, which is known to increase VT cycle length, interestingly was associated with ATP failure for unclear reasons. More individualized and possibly more aggressive ATP programming may be warranted in patients on amiodarone.

Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator - results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)

Background

Little is known about the ICD performance using enhanced detection algorithms in unselected, non-trial patients. Performance of recent generation ICD equipped with SmartShock™ technology (SST) for detection and conversion of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) was investigated.

Methods

4P was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in 10 Swiss implanting centers. Patients with a Class I indication according to international guidelines were included and received an ICD with SST. ICD discrimination capability was assessed by evaluating SST performance; therapy efficacy was assessed by rate of VTA conversions by ATP and by rescue shocks.

Results

Overall, 196 patients were included in the analysis with a mean duration of follow-up of 27.7 months (452 patient-years of observation). Patient-specific rather than recommended programming was preferred. Device-detected episodes were frequent (5147 episodes in 146 patients, 74.5%). In 44 patients (22.4%), 1274 episodes were categorized as VTA; only 215 episodes were symptomatic. ATP was the first-line therapy and highly effective (99.9% success rate at the episode level, 100.0% at the patient level). Rescue shocks were rare (66 episodes in 28 patients); 7 shocks in 5 patients (2.6%) were inappropriate. Death and hospitalization rates were low.

Conclusions

In a cohort of non-trial, unselected ICD patients, VTA episodes were frequent. The 4P results confirm the robustness of VTA detection by SST and the effectiveness of ATP treatment, hence limiting overall ICD shock burden.

Postmortem ICD interrogation in mode of death classification

BACKGROUND

The definition of sudden death due to arrhythmia relies on the time interval between onset of symptoms and death. However, not all sudden deaths are due to arrhythmia. In patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), postmortem device interrogation may help better distinguish the mode of death compared to a time-based definition alone.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the proportion of "sudden" cardiac deaths in patients with an ICD that have confirmed arrhythmia.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search for studies using postmortem ICD interrogation and a time-based classification of the mode of death. A modified QUADAS-2 checklist was used to assess risk of bias in individual studies. Outcome data were pooled where sufficient data were available.

RESULTS

Our search identified 22 studies undertaken between 1982 and 2015 with 23,600 participants. The pooled results (excluding studies with high risk of bias) suggest that ventricular arrhythmias are present at the time of death in 76% of "sudden" deaths (95% confidence interval [CI] 67-85; range 42-88).

CONCLUSION

Postmortem ICD interrogation identifies 24% of "sudden" deaths to be nonarrhythmic. Postmortem device interrogation should be considered in all cases of unexplained sudden cardiac death.

High-energy defibrillation increases the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the effects of shock energy on the dispersion of regional ventricular repolarization (DRVR), post-shock rhythm and sinus recovery time (SRT), and the relationship between DRVR and post-shock ventricular arrhythmias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten open-chest dogs were anesthetized. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was electrically induced and recorded from a 6 × 6 unipolar electrode plaque (4 mm spacing) sutured on the left ventricular epicardium. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined after 20 s of VF. DRVR was measured before VF, during the earliest post-shock sinus rhythm, and during sinus rhythm 30 s following shocks. Post-shock rhythm and SRT were evaluated after energies of 100% DFT, 125% DFT, 175% DFT, and 250% DFT.

RESULTS

In the100% DFT group, the DRVR of the earliest sinus rhythm and 30 s after successful defibrillation was not significantly different than that before VF. But the DRVRs were significantly increased in 125% DFT, 175% DFT, and 250% DFT group. DRVR after defibrillation in the 250% DFT group was higher than those in the 100% DFT and 125% DFT groups. SRT in the 250% DFT group was significantly longer than that in the other groups .The incidence of post-shock ventricular tachycardia was increased when a high-shock energy was applied (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

DRVR was increased by application of high-energy defibrillation associated with SRT prolongation. The increased DRVR may play an important role in the onset of post-shock ventricular tachycardia.

Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy

Although improvements in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy have taken place, many challenges do remain. Inappropriate delivery of therapy is a big problem that impacts the quality of life of ICD recipients. Although there is now a clear understanding that atrial arrhythmias are the main cause of inappropriate ICD therapies, physicians have not been very successful in preventing them. Additionally, although many tachycardia detection discriminators have been shown to be helpful, it is not clear that there is a particular combination that is ideal for all patients. Until such an algorithm is developed (which may not be possible), a detailed knowledge and use of all available programming options, guided by special characteristics of each unique patient, are the only foreseeable solutions. Finally, one must face the prospect that this problem cannot be vanquished, but only ameliorated.

Current state of knowledge and experts' perspective on the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

ICD implantation is today a well-recognized therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death. The available implantable devices at present need the use of permanent endocavitary leads which may cause, in some instances, serious troubles to the patients (lead dislodgement, ventricular perforation, lead infections, etc.). A new implantable defibrillator provided by only a subcutaneous lead is at present under evaluation. Its potential indications, usefulness benefits, and problems represent an interesting field of investigation and discussion. This paper describes the conclusions recently reached by a panel of experts, with regard to the potential role of an implantable subcutaneous defibrillator in the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Potential proarrhythmic effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions have the potential to be proarrhythmogenic. New arrhythmias can occur in the setting of clinically appropriate therapies, as well as during a cardiac rhythm for which therapy is not intended. Cardioversion/defibrillation therapies, antitachycardia pacing, and antibradycardia pacing are potential triggers for the development of new arrhythmias. Newer ICDs allow better recognition and interpretation of the arrhythmias that are induced by delivered therapies. Two cases of ICD-induced proarrhythmias are described. Based on the course of these patients and review of previous reports, proarrhythmic effects of ICD interventions along with prevention and management strategies are discussed.

Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Therapy

Sudden cardiac death is a major public health problem affecting 500,000 patients annually in the United States alone. The major risk factor for sudden cardiac death is the presence of coronary artery disease, usually in the setting of reduced ejection fraction. Globally, the incidence is expected to rise sharply as the prevalence of coronary artery disease and heart failure continue to increase. However, sudden cardiac death is a heterogeneous condition and may be caused by acute ischemia, structural defects, myocardial scar, and/or genetic mutations. Sudden death may occur even in a grossly normal heart. Beta-blockers can reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death, while implantable cardioverter defibrillators are effective at terminating malignant arrhythmias. Ejection fraction remains the major criterion to stratify patients for defibrillator implantation but this strategy alone is insensitive and nonspecific. Novel clinical, electrophysiologic, and genetic markers have been identified that may increase precision in patient selection for primary prevention therapy. This review discusses the epidemiology, mechanisms, etiologies, therapies, treatment guidelines, and future directions in the management of sudden cardiac death.

Simultaneous Atrial and Ventricular Anti-Tachycardia Pacing as a Novel Method of Rhythm Discrimination

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new discrimination algorithm for supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular (VT) tachycardias, based on the response to simultaneous (A+V) atrial (A) and ventricular (V) anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP).

METHODS

Patients undergoing electrophysiological testing or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation were enrolled (N = 32) and underwent A+V ATP through a Marquis ICD with investigational software. If persisting after ATP, the rhythm was classified as VT if the first electrical event was sensed on the V channel and as an SVT otherwise.

RESULTS

Arrhythmia sequences (N = 275; 53 VT; 222 SVT) were analyzed in 26 patients (age = 51 +/- 17 years, 13 men, LVEF = 0.49 +/- 0.14). In response to A+V ATP, 55% of SVT versus 41% of VT episodes were terminated (P = NS). Termination of VT but not of SVT was more likely with faster (50% at ATP/arrhythmia cycle length (CL) = 0.81 vs 8% at ATP/arrhythmia CL = 0.88, P = 0.02) but not with longer ATP bursts (P = NS). Of the 115 arrhythmias that persisted after A+V ATP, the algorithm correctly classified 24 of 24 VT (GEE-adjusted sensitivity = 100%) and 85 of 91 SVT (GEE-adjusted specificity = 93%). Proarrhythmia was noted after two A+V ATP, in the form of atrial fibrillation induction and VT acceleration.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a new algorithm that can discriminate between SVT and VT with a high sensitivity and specificity. This form of ATP can terminate 55% of SVT sequences. The performance of this new algorithm merits further testing in a large population of dual-chamber ICD patients.

Death Due to an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Inappropriate therapy due to noise oversensing caused a true ventricular fibrillation (VF) and death of a patient. A 49-year-old patient with a history of dilated cardiomyopathy received a double-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in 1991 for a sustained inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT). One appropriate shock delivered in 1994 terminated an episode of VT. The generator was replaced in 1995 and in 2000, and was connected to the initial leads. Three months after the second replacement, the patient received six consecutive shocks related to detection of noise interpreted as VF. Unfortunately, the sixth shock triggered a true VF, which was not treated due to end of the therapeutic sequence, and the patient died. The causes of the dysfunction are discussed.

Clinical significance and contributing factors of long-term variability in induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Long-Term Variability in Induced Tachyarrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular arrhythmias induced during electrophysiologic study (EPS) may vary over time, making arrhythmia induction studies unreliable. The aim of this prospective study was to clarify the clinical significance of long-term variability in induced arrhythmias and to elucidate factors determining this variability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three noninvasive EPSs were performed 1, 13, and 25 months after implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator in 40 patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, without a change in their antiarrhythmic drug regimens. The induced ventricular arrhythmias were categorized into five grades. Long-term variability, which was defined as a variation in the grades during the three EPSs, was observed in 23 patients (group A) and not in the remaining 17 patients (group B). During the 2-year period, spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias developed in 15 patients (65%) in group A but in only 4 patients (24%) in group B (P = 0.01). Inducibility of sustained tachyarrhythmias was not associated with emergence of spontaneous arrhythmias. All patients also underwent thallium-201 and iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans to evaluate the extent of the regions showing normal thallium uptake with reduced MIBG uptake. Group A patients showed greater thallium/MIBG mismatched regions than did group B patients (P = 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that long-term variability (relative risk [RR] 7.55, P = 0.03), amiodarone therapy (RR 0.14, P = 0.04), and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% (RR 6.26, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of spontaneous arrhythmia occurrence.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, long-term variability in induced arrhythmias, but not the inducibility of arrhythmias, is associated with a higher incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias. Regional cardiac sympathetic denervation may be an important mechanism of this variability. These results also may explain why inducibility-based antiarrhythmic drug testing does not predict patient prognosis.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Patients with Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia:

Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that patients with coronary disease, reduced left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) have improved survival with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, presumably secondary to effective termination of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, stored intracardiac electrograms were not always available and specific arrhythmias leading to ICD therapy were not always known. We examined the occurrence of ICD events in 51 consecutive patients who match the described patient profile to determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy. ICD detections were noted in 18 (35%) patients during a median follow-up period of 13.1 months. Appropriate therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 11 (22%) patients, with appropriate shocks in 8 (16%) patients and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in 4 (8%) patients. The time to first appropriate therapy occurred at a mean of 17 +/- 12 months (median 18 months, range 3-36 months). Inappropriate therapy occurred in 5 (10%) patients with inappropriate shocks in 4 patients and inappropriate ATP in 2 patients. Inappropriate therapy was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in 4 patients and for T wave oversensing in 1 patient. The reason for shock therapy was unknown in 1 patient (2%) due to ICD malfunction. The mean arrhythmia rate leading to appropriate therapy for VT/VF was 232 +/- 72 beats/min (range 181-400 beats/min), and the mean rate leading to inappropriate therapy for SVT was 168 +/- 10 beats/min (range 160-180 beats/min). Patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic NSVT commonly receive appropriate defibrillator therapy. These results support the need for ICD implantation for primary prevention, with attention to careful programming of the detection rate to prevent inappropriate therapy.

Incidence and Characteristics of Type-2 Breaks in Response to Antitachycardia Pacing Therapy in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients

INTRODUCTION

Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) effectively treats monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). The VT may cease immediately upon ATP completion (type-1 break), or it may persist or change to another tachyarrhythmia for one or more beats before termination (type-2 break). We investigated the prevalence and characteristics of type-2 breaks in ICD patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed VT episodes with stored electrograms that had at least one ATP therapy delivered in PainFREE Rx trial, a multicenter trial with 220 coronary artery disease patients. Further subanalysis was performed by classifying the VT as slow or fast based on the cycle length (CL); slow VT: CL >320 ms, fast VT: 240 < or =CL < or =320 ms. To assess the effect of ATP on VT, comparison was performed of pre-ATP and post-ATP CL variability, average CL, and morphology. A total of 514 episodes (264 slow VT and 250 fast VT) were analyzed. The burst ATP terminated 457 (89%; 239 slow VT and 218 fast VT) of 514 episodes. Forty five (10%) episodes in 18 (32%) patients had type-2 breaks. The mean number of beats during type-2 breaks was 5.4 +/- 3.1 (median 4). The mean time for episode termination measured from the end of ATP to return of first sinus/paced beat was 2.9 +/- 1.2 seconds (median 2.6). The VT CL variability increased by 150% after ATP delivery. The ATP affected either VT CL or morphology, or both of 36 (80%) type-2 breaks (9% accelerated, 47% decelerated, 22% changed in morphology only). Among the 9 (20%) episodes that remained unchanged in morphology and CL, four episodes (9%) were unaffected by ATP.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 10% of VT episodes that were successfully terminated with burst ATP therapy had type-2 breaks. Type-2 breaks are associated with an increase in CL variability. Approximately 9% of all type-2 episodes may be spontaneously terminating nonsustained VT given that ATP did not affect these episodes in any way.

Analysis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial

INTRODUCTION

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is commonly used to treat patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Arrhythmia recurrence rates in these patients are high, but which patients will receive a therapy and the forms of arrhythmia recurrence (VT or VF) are poorly understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The therapy delivered by the ICD was examined in 449 patients randomized to ICD therapy in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial. Events triggering ICD shocks or antitachycardia pacing (ATP) were reviewed for arrhythmia diagnosis, clinical symptoms, activity at the onset of the arrhythmia, and appropriateness and results of therapy. Both shock and ATP therapies were frequent by 2 years, with 68% of patients receiving some therapy or having an arrhythmic death. An appropriate shock was delivered in 53% of patients, and ATP was delivered in 68% of patients who had ATP activated. The first arrhythmia treated in follow-up was diagnosed as VT (63%), VF (13%), supraventricular tachycardia (18%), unknown arrhythmia (3%), or due to ICD malfunction or inappropriate sensing (3%). Acceleration of an arrhythmia by the ICD occurred in 8% of patients who received any therapy. No physical activity consistently preceded arrhythmias, nor did any single clinical factor predict the symptoms of the arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of ICD therapy in AVID patients was common, primarily due to VT. Inappropriate ICD therapy occurred frequently. Use of ICD therapy as a surrogate endpoint for death in clinical trials should be avoided.

Effect of elevated heart rate preceding the onset of ventricular tachycardia on antitachycardia pacing effectiveness in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

The incorporation of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) into implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has provided a better tolerated alternative to shocks. ATP has been shown to be effective in terminating approximately 80% to 90% of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes. Although ATP is routinely used, little is known about predictors of ATP failure. Based on the evaluation of stored electrograms, we aimed to prospectively follow patients with ICDs, and to analyze parameters affecting ATP effectiveness. One hundred eighteen consecutive patients received ICDs for standard indications. Before discharge, empirical, standardized ATP therapy was programmed in all patients within VT zones. A total of 1,218 spontaneous tachycardia episodes occurred in 51 patients during a mean follow-up of 24.5 +/- 12 months. Among these, 888 VTs were diagnosed. One hundred four fast VTs were detected in the ventricular fibrillation zone and treated with primary shock delivery. ATP was attempted 881 times in the remaining 784 VT episodes. ATP terminated 640 VTs successfully, ATP failed in 55 VTs finally reverted by shocks, and 89 VTs converted to a slower VT outside the VT zone. Fifty-one of these slower VTs reverted spontaneously, and 38 were redetected and treated. Finally, in primary intention-to-treat basis, ATP was successful in 691 VTs (88%) and unsuccessful in 93 VTs (12%). There was no influence of VT cycle length on ATP success rate. Furthermore, ATP efficacy was similar between patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% or >35%, between daytime and nighttime, as well as between patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. A faster heart rate immediately preceding the onset of VT (103 +/- 19 vs 78 +/- 14 beats/min, respectively, hazard ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 2.11 to 7.89, p <0.001), and absence of beta-blocker therapy (82% vs 93%, respectively, hazard ratio 2.71, 95% confidence interval 1.72 to 4.29, p = 0.02) were found, by Cox proportional-hazard analysis, to be the sole independent predictors of ATP ineffectiveness in ICD recipients. Thus, the present study identified both preceding sinus tachycardia (reflecting an increased sympathetic tone) and lack of beta-blocker use as independent risk factors for reduced success of ATP therapy in terminating VT. Therefore, modification of sympathetic tone may be beneficial for patients with ICDs.

ICD leads: design and chronic dysfunctions

The treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias has changed over the last 10 years. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), once used only as a last resort therapy, have now become the treatment of choice. This change occurred before the first results of randomized studies on ICD therapy in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias were published by the end of 1997. Technological advances of ICD therapy, in particular the development of transvenous leads, were to a large extent responsible for this change. Modern leads are characterized by their multilumen design that incorporates straight wires and coiled conductors into a single electrode body. Conductors and insulation are sheathed with additional insulation layers. The most frequently used insulating materials are silicone, polyurethane, and fluoropolymers. Lead failures are an important complication of ICD therapy. Fractured conductors, compression, creeping, or insulation defects from abrasion can cause such lead dysfunctions. Chronically implanted leads will inevitably have an increased risk of failure due to defects despite all technological advances. In the light of improving survival figures in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and increasing numbers of ICD implantations, lead failures are becoming a clinical problem of ever increasing importance. Therefore, the question of which lead types necessitate extraction when a certain failure occurs and which leads can be left in place. Despite continuous improvements in lead extraction systems and growing experience in their use, the extraction of any pacemaker or ICD lead is associated with some risk of complications.

Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms of sudden death (SD) in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]) treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

BACKGROUND

Despite ICD therapy, some patients with VT/VF still die suddenly. Optimal ICD use requires determination of the mechanisms of these residual SDs.

METHODS

We reviewed 320 patient deaths during trials of Medtronic transvenous ICD systems (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). Sudden deaths were further categorized according to mechanism. Post-shock electromechanical dissociation (EMD) describes a scenario where VT/VF was appropriately detected and treated by an ICD shock that restored a physiologic rhythm, but death still occurred immediately by EMD.

RESULTS

A mode of death could be ascribed for 317 patients-90 (28%) were sudden, 156 (49%) were non-sudden cardiac, and 71 (22%) were noncardiac. A mechanism of SD was proposed for 68 patients-20 (29%) had post-shock EMD, 17 (25%) had VT/VF uncorrected by shocks, 11 (16%) had primary electromechanical dissociation, 9 (13%) had incessant VT/VF, 5 (7%) had VT/VF after their ICD was deactivated or removed, and 6 (9%) had single instances of various other terminal events. Only New York Heart Association functional class independently predicted SD by post-shock EMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common mechanism of SD in patients with an ICD is VT/VF treated with an appropriate shock followed by EMD. As this mechanism accounted for 29% of the SDs to which a cause could be ascribed, this mechanism of SD warrants further investigation.

Recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator after the first device therapy: implications for antiarrhythmic therapy and driving restrictions. CARE Group

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether clinical or electrophysiologic characteristics could predict initial and subsequent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy.

BACKGROUND

Identification of markers to predict subsequent ICD therapy and symptoms after the first event could affect patient management.

METHODS

We analyzed baseline and follow-up data on 125 ICD patients followed for 408+/-321 days. Medications and ICD programming were not changed after first ICD therapy.

RESULTS

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy occurred in 58 patients (46%). Clinical features were as follows: mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 29%+/-15%; coronary artery disease 84%; presenting arrhythmia with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) in 68%. In a multivariate analysis the relative risk for ICD therapy in patients presenting with SMVT versus cardiac arrest (CA) was 2.57 (range, 1.32 to 5.01), and for patients with LVEF < or =25%, 1.95 (1.11 to 3.45), respectively (p < 0.05). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy was not predicted by any other variable. Forty-six patients had second ICD therapy. Mean time to second ICD therapy was only 66+/-93 days compared with 138+/-168 days for first ICD therapy (p < 0.05). No predictor for second ICD therapy was found. Regarding symptoms, impaired consciousness during initial ICD therapy was predicted only by SMVT cycle length <250 ms at electrophysiologic testing. In contrast, symptoms were similar between first and second ICD therapy (p = 0.0001). Of note, ventricular tachycardia cycle length preceding first and second ICD therapy was similar (r = 0.76, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

First ICD therapy tends to occur in patients presenting with SMVT and LVEF < or =25%. Subsequent therapy occurs sooner and is unpredictable, suggesting that antiarrhythmic drug therapy should be considered after the first symptomatic ICD therapy. Symptoms during first ICD therapy predict subsequent symptoms, and patients presenting with SMVT and asymptomatic first ICD therapy are at very low risk for future syncopal ICD therapy.

Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs with implantable defibrillator therapy for atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have proven highly successful in the treatment of recurrent ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Despite their high efficacy in terminating arrhythmias, concomitant therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs in ICD recipients remains common. Antiarrhythmic drugs are employed in an attempt to to limit patient exposure to high-energy shocks, primarily by reducing the number of arrhythmia reccurrences, suppressing coexisting arrhythmias, affecting rate and organization of tachycardias, and increasing efficacy of painless pacing therapies. Data regarding interaction of antiarrhythmic drugs with ICDs are incomplete and mostly based on animal models; however, it is clear that antiarrhythmic drugs affect all aspects of function of devices such as defibrillation threshold, pacing threshold, and sensing of both atrial and and ventricular arrhythmias. Because significant change in any of these functions may result in a nonfunctional device, and magnitude of drug effect in an individual patient is unpredictable, careful assessment of ICD function after an institution of therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Algorithm for the prevention of ventricular tachycardia onset: the Prevent Study

The Prevent Study is designed to investigate the effect of a rate-smoothing algorithm on the onset of ventricular tachycardia in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) with dual-chamber pacing and sensing function. Included in the study are patients who require ICD therapy for recurrent ventricular tachycardia or aborted cardiac arrest. After giving informed consent to the study, the patients receive a Ventak AV ICD (CPI-Guidant, St. Paul, MN). The patients are randomized to start either with active or inactive rate-smoothing algorithm. After 3 months, all patients cross over to the opposite group. Questionnaires are used to investigate quality-of-life issues. A total of 240 patients will be enrolled in the study, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months.

Energy levels for defibrillation: what is of real clinical importance?

Today, transthoracic and intracardiac defibrillation offer a well-accepted and widely used form of therapy for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Despite the wide clinical use of defibrillators, the mechanisms by which an electrical shock halts fibrillation are still not completely understood. During a shock, different amounts of current flow through the different parts of the heart and the current distribution is highly uneven. This current distribution is affected by changes in the shock potential gradient through the heart, changes in fiber orientation, and changes in myocardial conductivity caused by connective tissue barriers. It would be ideal if the potential gradient distribution throughout the ventricles could be measured directly for each individual patient during defibrillator implantation and follow-up and the shock strength could be programmed based on this measurement, but so far this is not possible. A more feasible approach is to determine, by trial and error, the magnitude of the shock strength delivered through the defibrillation electrodes for successful defibrillation. There is no distinct threshold value above which all shocks succeed and below which all shocks fail to defibrillate. Rather, increasing shock strength increases the likelihood the shock will succeed. Therefore, instead of a distinct defibrillation threshold, a probability of success curve exists. However, increasing the shock strength above an optimal range can actually decrease the success rate for defibrillation. One possible explanation is that the high voltage gradients caused by such large shocks damage cells and result in postshock arrhythmias that may reinitiate fibrillation. Another problem that can affect the probability of defibrillation success for a particular programmed energy setting is that the shock strength required for defibrillation may increase over time due to (1) the growth of fibrotic tissue around the defibrillation electrode; (2) migration of the lead; (3) acute ischemia; or (4) other changes in the underlying cardiac disease (e.g., worsening of heart failure). Such possible increases in the defibrillation shock strength requirement should be compensated for before they occur by adding a margin of safety to the shock strength needed for effective defibrillation. When programming an implantable defibrillator, it is important to keep in mind that the defibrillation shock should be (1) strong enough to defibrillate at least 98% of the time with the first shock; (2) weak enough not to cause severe post-shock arrhythmias or reinitiation of fibrillation; but (3) strong enough to compensate for changes of defibrillation energy requirements over time. This usually can be accomplished by setting the defibrillator 7-10 J higher than the defibrillation threshold determined by a standard step-down protocol.

Efficacy and safety of the initial use of stability and onset criteria in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

INTRODUCTION

Inappropriate therapies are the most frequent adverse event in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Most ICDs offer a stability criterion to discriminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from atrial fibrillation and an onset criterion to discriminate VT from sinus tachycardia. The efficacy and safety of these criteria, if used immediately after implantation, is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a case control study, 87 patients in whom stability and onset criteria had been activated immediately after ICD implantation were matched to 87 patients in whom these criteria had not been activated. The groups were matched for known predictors of inappropriate therapies. With stability and onset criteria off, 24 patients (28%) received inappropriate therapies due to atrial fibrillation (n = 14) or sinus tachycardia (n = 11); with stability and onset on, only 11 patients (13%) were treated by the ICD due to atrial fibrillation (n = 5) or sinus tachycardia (n = 7) (log rank: P = 0.029). Five patients suffered inappropriate therapies despite the fact that onset (n = 4) or stability (n = 1) criteria were not fulfilled once tachycardias continued for a prespecified duration. Only one patient experienced a failure to detect VT due to the onset criterion; none because of stability.

CONCLUSION

The immediate use of stability and onset criteria after ICD implantation reduces inappropriate therapies due to atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia. Because of the potential for underdetection of VT, this approach should be limited to tachycardia rates hemodynamically tolerated by the patient.

Analysis of the intraventricular electrogram for differentiation of distinct monomorphic ventricular arrhythmias

This study investigated the effectiveness of correlation waveform analysis for identifying different ventricular electrogram morphologies of multiple VTs in the same patient. Patients with implantable antitachycardia devices are commonly subject to the occurrence of more than one distinct monomorphic VT. Each of these VTs may have unique therapeutic alternatives for termination. VTs with identical and different monomorphic configurations were recorded (1-500 Hz) using distal bipolar (1 cm) and distal unipolar electrograms from the right ventricular apex. Thirty-six distinct monomorphic VTs induced in 15 patients were analyzed. Nine VTs with identical morphologies (12/12 surface ECGs) were induced twice and used as a control. A template was created for each VT induced. Correlation waveform analysis was used to compare each depolarization of all other VTs induced subsequently in the same patient. The mean correlation coefficient (p mu) of cycle-by-cycle analysis was used as a discriminant function: p mu > or = 0.95 was considered matched; and p mu < 0.95 was considered distinct. From the control population, VTs were successfully classified as identical in 9 of 9 cases (100%) using both bipolar and unipolar electrograms. VTs with different monomorphic configurations were successfully classified as being different in 31 of 33 cases (94%) using bipolar electrogram analysis and in 29 of 33 cases (88%) using the unipolar. Template matching is effective for detecting: (1) the recurrence of VTs, which are identical; and (2) the occurrence of a VT with a different configuration. This method appears effective using either unipolar or bipolar intracardiac waveforms.

[The current status of implantable automatic defibrillators]

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator has become an important therapy for patients with sustained or life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Although the concept for the implantable cardioverter defibrillator originated in the late 1960s, the first device was implanted in humans in 1980. Since then, the technology has improved rapidly the design, function and reliability of the devices have been greatly modified. There are currently five companies dealing with defibrillators in Spain incorporating multiple options in defibrillation, pacing and sensing capabilities. New devices with atrioventricular pacing and atrial defibrillation possibilities will soon become available. The purpose of this article is to review the principal functions of implantable cardioverter defibrillators currently available.

Distortion of intracardiac electrograms following defibrillator shocks for atrial tachyarrhythmias

In three patients with a defibrillator system consisting of a Ventak P2 pulse generator and an Endotak C transvenous lead, we observed distortion of intracardiac electrograms following defibrillator shocks for atrial arrhythmias. There was a transient marked widening of the intracardiac ventricular complexes resembling ventricular tachycardia. This phenomenon should be recognized when evaluating arrhythmic episodes.

Current concepts in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

The "chain of survival" is important in the resuscitation of a patient who has had a cardiac arrest. The provision of Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) is essential in this "chain of survival." Both BLS and ACLS have undergone several revisions since their initial inception. This article reviews (1) the current established and investigational issues of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) the incidence and outcomes of anesthesia-related cardiac arrest, (3) the use of cardiopulmonary bypass in resuscitation, and (4) cerebral protection during and after resuscitation.

Simulated internal defibrillation in humans using an anatomically realistic three-dimensional finite element model of the thorax

INTRODUCTION

Determination of the optimal electrode configuration during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation remains largely an empirical process. This study investigated the feasibility of using a finite element model of the thorax to predict clinical defibrillation metrics for internal defibrillation in humans. Computed defibrillation metrics from simulations of three common electrode configurations with a monophasic waveform were compared to pooled metrics for similar electrode and waveform configurations reported in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A three-dimensional finite element model was constructed from CT cross-sections of a human thorax. Myocardial current density distributions for three electrode configurations (epicardial patches, right ventricular [RV] coil/superior vena cava [SVC] coil, RV coil/SVC coil/subcutaneous patch) and a truncated monophasic pulse with a 65% tilt were simulated. Assuming an inexcitability threshold of 25 mA/cm2 (10 V/cm) and a 75% critical mass criterion for successful defibrillation, defibrillation metrics (interelectrode impedance, defibrillation threshold current, voltage, and energy) were calculated for each electrode simulation. Values of these metrics were within 1 SD of sample-size weighted means for the corresponding metrics determined for similar electrode configurations and waveforms reported in human clinical studies. Simulated myocardial current density distributions suggest that variations in current distribution and uniformity partially explain differences in defibrillation energy requirements between electrode configurations.

CONCLUSION

Anatomically realistic three-dimensional finite element modeling can closely simulate internal defibrillation in humans. This may prove useful for characterizing patient-specific factors that influence clinically relevant properties of current density distributions and defibrillation energy requirements of various ICD electrode configurations.

Driving issues related to arrhythmic syncope

The safety of driving in patients with cardiac arrhythmias is a common concern. Although the risk of driving in these patients cannot be reduced to zero, available data and expert consensus suggest that most patients with arrhythmias can return to driving with a relatively low risk of harm to themselves and others, that is, a risk within the limits deemed acceptable by society. Specific recommendations for allowing patients with various cardiac rhythm abnormalities to drive are reviewed in detail.

Preliminary clinical experience with the first dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator

The lack of specificity of VT detection is a significant shortcoming of current ICDs. In a French multicenter study, 18 patients underwent implantation of the Defender 9001 (ELA Medical), an ICD utilizing dual chamber pacing and arrhythmia detection. Over a mean follow-up period of 7.1 +/- 4.5 months, 176 tachycardia episodes recorded in the device memory were analyzed, and physician diagnosis was compared with that by the device. All 122 VT/VF episodes were correctly diagnosed, as were 51 of 53 supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Two episodes of AF with rapid regular ventricular rates were treated as VT, and a third episode, treated as VT, could not be diagnosed with certainty. A dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator offers improved diagnostic specificity without loss of sensitivity, in addition to the hemodynamic benefit of dual chamber pacing.

Antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: how many attempts are useful?

The purpose of this study was to determine the termination and acceleration rates for 1 to 6 attempts of antitachycardia pacing [ATP] delivered by ICD in order to terminate spontaneously occurring VTs. Twenty-four ICD recipients with active ATP programs, including a maximum of six ATP sequences and spontaneously occurring VTs during follow-up, were investigated. During a mean follow-up of 42 +/- 15 months (range, 17-63 months) 413 spontaneous VT episodes (17 +/- 14; range, 1-49 per patient) resulting in appropriate ATP delivery by the ICD occurred. ATP successfully terminated 328 episodes (80%) with a mean number of 1.6 +/- 1.1 pacing sequences. Eighty episodes (19%) were accelerated by ATP and 5 (1%) were unresponsive to ATP. The ATP success decreased until the third ATP sequence (59%-->31%-->24%), but increased again in the fourth to sixth attempt (46%-->46%-->29%). The acceleration rate increased from sequence one to sequence three (8%-->13%-->28%), but decreased significantly in further ATP attempts (19%-->0%-->0%). The mean time delays until redetection or termination after 4, 5, and 6 attempts of ATP were 22 +/- 5 seconds, 37 +/- 2 seconds, and 41 +/- 9 seconds, respectively. Nine patients (37%) used > or = 3 ATP attempts during follow-up and all of them had a therapeutic benefit from it. Five out of 13 VTs (38%) treated with > or = 4 attempts could ultimately be terminated by ATP. The results of this study demonstrate that the first ATP sequence is the most effective and that > 4 ATP attempts may be useful in a minority of patients. There seems to be a low risk of VT acceleration by the fourth to sixth ATP sequence. Because of the associated time delay, a high number of ATP attempts should only be programmed in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated stable VTs.

Initial single-center experience with an advanced third-generation investigational defibrillator

The CPI PRxII is a recently approved, multitiered implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) that delivers high and low energy biphasic shocks, antitachycardia (ATP) and bradycardia pacing, and stores 2.5 minutes of electrograms from the widely spaced shocking electrodes. The PRxII was implanted in 58 patients at Yale-New Haven Hospital between December 1993 and January 1995. At implant, mean biphasic defibrillation threshold (DFT) in patients with testing to failure was 10 J (1-20). All 36 patients who were candidates for a new transvenous system underwent successful nonthoracotomy implantation. Based on noninvasive predischarge EPS results, 30 patients had > or = 1 VT zone: 21 patients had ATP, 9 others had first shock < or = 5 J. During follow-up, 13 patients had been treated for 379 events (range, 1-127). Of 340 events in a zone with ATP, 97% responded to ATP, 3% required shock. First programmed shock converted all events in a VF zone. Details, including RR intervals, were available for all events in 15 of 17 patients receiving appropriate or inappropriate therapy or diverted shocks. One hundred eleven of 148 available electrograms confirmed VT by morphology, rate, and/or presence of AV dissociation. In nine patients, electrogram data altered therapy through diagnosis of inappropriate or diverted therapy, guidance of detection enhancements, or diagnosis of previously unrecognized VTs. We conclude the PRxII achieves low DFTs that obviate the need for thoracotomy and effectively treats ventricular arrhythmias with ATP and shock, with programming guided by noninvasive electrophysiology. Multiple stored electrograms from widely spaced shocking electrodes greatly enhance diagnostic capabilities, facilitating effective treatment.

Limitations of tachycardia confirmation and rate classification algorithms in a third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Newer ICDs provide antitachycardia (ATP) and bradycardia pacing and cardioversion and defibrillation shocks based on sensed interval criteria. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the algorithm related errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification that occurred in patients with a third-generation, noncommitted, tiered ICD therapy. Forty-three consecutive patients with the Guardian ATP 4210 ICD, which uses an X out of Y sensed interval counting algorithm for tachycardia detection, confirmation, and classification were studied. Surface ECGs, intracardiac electrograms, stored data logs, and sense histories were reviewed to diagnose errors due to these algorithms that resulted in delivery of inappropriate therapy or inhibition of appropriate therapy. Sixty-eight classification or confirmation algorithm errors from 7,610 tachycardia detections (< 1%) were diagnosed in 23 (53%) of 43 patients. Three types of errors not related to device or sensing lead malfunction or programming mistakes were seen. In 26 episodes, the confirmation algorithm failed to detect late tachycardia reversion of nonsustained tachyarrhythmias, on the last or next to last sensed interval, and did not inhibit ATP (n = 17) or shocks (n = 9). In 28 episodes, inaccurate classification of tachycardia rate resulted in inappropriate ATP (n = 23) or shock (n = 5) therapy. In 14 episodes, the posttherapy reconformation algorithm produced inhibition of VVI pacing and prolonged asystole following shock therapy. These errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification were due to the inherent limitations of the X out of Y counting algorithm.

Sensing and tachyarrhythmia detection problems in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Sensing of cardiac activity and detection of tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are complex functions and errors occur. Sources of sensing-detection errors include the variable nature of intracardiac electrograms, the occasional inability of automatically adjusting signal amplifiers to cope with this variability, problems with sensing leads, inappropriate programming, and limitations of tachyarrhythmia detection algorithms, which are optimized to avoid underdetection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Current ICDs vary considerably in details of sensing and detection function, programmability, and diagnostic data, so that a through knowledge of each device is necessary to diagnose and correct these problems. Stored intracardiac electrograms and/or marker channels available in most of these devices have contributed much to our understanding of sensing-detection errors. Undersensing of individual signals, most frequently due to signal variability and/or inability of the amplifier to adjust adequately, can lead to delay or failure of tachyarrhythmia detection. Delay or failure of tachyarrhythmia detection can also occur if algorithms to enhance specificity, such as sudden onset or rate stability, are utilized. Oversensing of T waves or noise can lead to false detection; however, the most common cause of false detection is the inability of current detection algorithms to distinguish supraventricular from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. New algorithms that incorporate atrial sensing, electrogram morphology analysis, or hemodynamic monitoring may result in improved detection accuracy of ICDs in the future.

Incidence of ICD lead related complications during long-term follow-up: comparison of epicardial and endocardial electrode systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of epicardial and endocardial lead systems for third-generation cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and to assess the usefulness of diagnostic tools. One hundred forty patients with 61 epicardial (43.6%) and 79 nonthoracotomy systems (56.4%) were followed for 25 +/- 19 months. A total of 18 (12.9%) lead related complications were documented. Complications of epicardial systems were detected in 10 patients (16.4%) during a follow-up time of 36 +/- 8 months: crinkling of patch electrodes in 6 patients (9.8%), insulation breakage of sensing electrodes in 2 patients (3.3%), and adapter defect in 2 patients (3.3%). Eight of the patients (10.1%) with transvenous-subcutaneous systems had lead related complications during a 13 +/- 6 months follow-up: fracture of the subcutaneous patch lead in 2 patients (2.5%), dislodgement of the right ventricular lead in 2 patients (2.5%), dislodgement of the superior vena cava lead in 2 patients (2.5%), insulation breakage of sensing electrodes in 1 patient (1.3%), and connector defect in 1 patient (1.3%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of lead related complications between epicardial and endocardial systems (P > 0.05). Fractures, dislodgements, and crinklings were documented within the first 8 +/- 5 months by regular chest X ray. Defects of insulation, adapter, or connector were detected 22 +/- 10 months after implantation and were associated with delivery of multiple inappropriate ICD therapies. An operative lead revision was indicated for 4 epicardial (6.6%) and 6 endocardial (7.6%) lead systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocardial lead systems offer a similar long-term stability as compared to epicardial lead systems. Chest X ray is the most useful tool to detect lead fracture, dislodgment, and patch crinkling. Marker recordings or real-time electrograms have not been helpful in this series to identify patients with suspected lead defects prior to the experience of inappropriate ICD discharges.

Failures of epicardial and transvenous leads for implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Lead failures constitute a major risk for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, data about the incidence and patterns of ICD-lead failures in a larger population are lacking. We analyzed the short-term and midterm performance of 27 epicardial and 103 nonthoracotomy ICD-lead systems during a follow-up period of 36 +/- 21 months and 22 +/- 10 months, respectively (p < 0.05). The failure rate was 5 (19%) of 27 in the epicardial and 6 (6%) of 103 in the nonthoracotomy group (p < 0.05). The most common symptom was erroneous detection of ventricular fibrillation from artifact sensing in five patients. Two patients had to be resuscitated because of failure to defibrillate. Loss of pacing and loss of sensing were seen in two patients. Only two asymptomatic lead fractures could be diagnosed on routine radiograph. In conclusion, there was a considerable rate of lead failures, especially in epicardial systems. Long-term studies addressing the longevity of ICD leads, mechanisms of their failures, and improved diagnostic facilities are important to further increase the safety of this therapeutic approach.

Current approaches in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The article has summarized the studies and ongoing trials looking at the significance and treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In most instances, the presence of these arrhythmias is associated with an increased risk of future arrhythmic events. Electrophysiologic studies are helpful in risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease but can be misleading in the setting of dilated cardiomyopathy and often produce nonspecific results in patients with HCM. The need for an invasive electrophysiologic study is crucial in the diagnosis of certain ventricular arrhythmias that are amenable to cure with radiofrequency catheter ablation, such as idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and BBR-VT. The correct approach for patients with SVT not amenable to catheter ablation remains to be determined. In deciding whether to use a device or drug therapy, however, one should take into consideration the degree of left ventricular dysfunction and the overall health status of the patient. For example, device implantation clearly reduces sudden death in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction but may not change total mortality because these same patients may die of congestive heart failure. Device therapy might be more cost-effective for patients with less severe depression of left ventricular function.

Right atrial compression related to defibrillator patches

Acceptable function of an internal defibrillator can be achieved with different patch orientations. For patients requiring defibrillator patches concomitant with a cardiac procedure requiring extracorporeal circulation, application of one of the patches within the pericardium adjacent to the right atrium has provided excellent defibrillation thresholds. We describe 4 such patients in whom a compressing thrombus subsequently developed between the patch and the atrium. The thrombus was small and asymptomatic in 1 patient, but caused localized tamponade requiring reexploration in 2 patients and a fatal superior vena caval obstruction in 1. The precise etiology of this serious complication remains unclear, but its occurrence argues against the application of intrapericardial defibrillator patches in this orientation.

Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the catheterization laboratory: initial experiences in 48 patients

The exponential increase in cardioverter-defibrillator implantations has resulted in a need for safe implantations that do not require long waiting periods. We report intraoperative and follow-up results in 48 patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias who underwent cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the catheterization laboratory. Twenty-six (54%) patients had their first cardioverter-defibrillator implant (group 1), and 22 (46%) patients underwent pulse-generator replacement (group 2). In all patients, cardioverter-defibrillator implant or pulse-generator replacement was performed with the patient under general anesthesia. In 25 (96%) of 26 patients in group 1, cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was possible with a mean defibrillation threshold of 13 +/- 8 J. One patient had a defibrillation threshold of > 25 J, and therefore cardioverter-defibrillator implant was not achieved. This patient underwent epicardial device implantation 1 day later. Another patient in group 1 had vessel rupture (vena subclavia) intraoperatively. During a mean follow-up of 2 +/- 1 months, two patients died from congestive heart failure 2 and 4 months after device implantation. An infection occurred in one patient in group 2, 3 months after generator replacement. In conclusion, these data show that in the majority of patients cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the catheterization laboratory is safe and has a low complication rate and therefore can generally be recommended.

Benefits of treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with stable ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

The availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) that are capable of antitachycardia pacing may lead to an increased use of ICDs in patients with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest. The frequency of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardias (cycle length < 250 ms) was investigated in patients who had a third generation ICD with endocardial leads implanted because they had haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and October 1993, 50 patients (age (mean (SD)) 60 (11); ejection fraction 39 (16)%; 82% with coronary artery disease and 8% with dilated cardiomyopathy) with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (cycle length (mean (SD)) 348 (60) ms; range 250-500 ms) and without a history of cardiac arrest were treated with third generation ICDs that were capable of antitachycardia pacing. Fast ventricular tachycardia had been induced in 14 (28%) during baseline electrophysiological study. The benefit of ICD treatment was estimated as the difference between total mortality and the occurrence of fast ventricular tachycardia that would have been fatal if it had not been terminated.

RESULTS

During follow up of 17 (12) months, 33 patients (66%) had a total of 3861 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. 91% of these episodes were terminated by antitachycardia pacing. 11 patients (22%) had episodes of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardia and 3 of these also had inducible fast ventricular tachycardia. One patient died suddenly 27 months after implantation. The difference between survival without fast ventricular tachycardia and total mortality was 9%, 12%, 27%, and 27% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

About a fifth of patients who had been given an ICD to treat haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and who had no history of cardiac arrest experienced fast ventricular tachycardia during follow up requiring immediate cardioversion. Prospective studies are needed to investigate whether the prognosis of patients with a history of haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest is improved by ICD therapy.

A new transvenous internal cardioverter-defibrillator: implantation technique, complications, and short-term follow-up

Twenty-four patients with ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia underwent implantation of a new transvenous defibrillator. All patients had a device implanted without thoracotomy. High placement of a shock lead in the anonymous vein and inversion of the shock-wave polarity allowed avoidance of placement of subcutaneous patches. Implantation time decreased from 138 minutes for the first 12 patients to 82 minutes for the last 12 patients, with 4 and 11 subpectoral pockets, respectively. Three patients required a minor reintervention. No bleeding or infection occurred. One episode of pulmonary edema and one pulmonary embolism were seen in the postoperative course. No postoperative deaths were observed. During a mean follow-up period of 4.12 months, 58% of the 24 patients had symptomatic arrhythmic episodes, with shocks in 50% of the 24. Inappropriate shocks were delivered in three cases (atrial fibrillation and T-wave sensing). One episode was not terminated even with four internal shocks. One patient had ventricular fibrillation because of a sensing problem. By reprogramming of sensitivity, back-up pacing, and adjustment of drug therapy these arrhythmic complications could be prevented. Pectoral implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator is easy and can be performed by cardiologists experienced in pacemaker implantation. Careful postoperative observation, reprogramming after the first spontaneous event, and prehospital discharge induction of ventricular fibrillation will prevent arrhythmic complications.

Arrhythmias after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: comparison of epicardial and transvenous systems

Surgery for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators can cause postoperative exacerbation of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. It is not known whether the techniques of electrode implantation (epicardial vs transvenous) influence the incidence of arrhythmia exacerbation. We reviewed the postoperative course of 229 consecutive patients who received either epicardial (n = 119) or transvenous (n = 110) implantations from 1984 to 1994. Exacerbation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was defined as an increase in the number of sustained VTs during the postoperative versus the preoperative 2 weeks. Of the entire cohort, 18 patients (8%) developed exacerbation of VT after operation, which was more frequent in patients with epicardial than with transvenous implantations (12% vs 4%, p < 0.03, odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 13.2). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 15% of patients with epicardial versus 1% of those with transvenous implantations (p = 0.00005, odds ratio 19.4, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 86.7). These differences persisted after excluding patients with concurrent cardiac surgery. Preoperative occurrence of arrhythmias was the strongest independent predictor for postoperative occurrence (p < 0.01 for VT, p < 0.0001 for atrial fibrillation). Epicardial implantation (p = 0.03) and a history of myocardial infarction (p = 0.04) were independent predictors for postoperative VT exacerbation, whereas epicardial implantation (p < 0.05) and concurrent coronary bypass surgery (p = 0.0001) were independent predictors for postoperative new atrial fibrillation. Perioperative discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs did not influence postoperative VT exacerbation. Epicardial implantation was associated with longer length of hospital stay than transvenous implantation (p = 0.0005), independent of age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and concurrent cardiac surgery.

The pacer-cardioverter-defibrillator: function and clinical experience

Pacer-Cardioverter-Defibrillator. This article reviews the function of the pacer-cardioverter-defibrillator (PCD). Detection of ventricular arrhythmias occurs in two programmable zones, with onset and stability modifiers available to diminish overdetection of sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation, respectively. The sensing circuitry utilizes an auto-adjusting sensitivity with exponential decay to allow detection of low-amplitude ventricular fibrillation electrograms without T wave oversensing. Treatment can be accomplished by tiered therapy with two types of antitachycardia pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation. Cardioversion and defibrillation shocks are programmable between single pathway when two leads are used and simultaneous or sequential shock delivery when a three-lead system is used. A telemetered marker channel and electrogram aid in assessing device function during implantation and follow-up. Previously published literature is cited to expand on various aspects of PCD function and programming.