Diagnosis of mild hypertension by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Relationship between office isolated systolic or diastolic hypertension and white-coat hypertension across the age spectrum: a home blood pressure study

OBJECTIVE

The current study investigated the prevalence of white-coat hypertension (WCH) and white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH) throughout the age spectrum among individuals with office isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) and systolic-diastolic hypertension (SDH) who were untreated or treated with antihypertensive medications, respectively.

METHODS

We cross-sectionally evaluated 8809 untreated (42% males, 52.1 ± 16.2 years) and 9136 treated (39% males, 59.7 ± 14.5 years) individuals from two independent Brazilian populations who underwent home blood pressure monitoring. Participants were also categorized as younger (<40 years), intermediate (≥40 and <60 years) and older (≥60 years) age.

RESULTS

Unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed that the frequency of WCH and WUCH was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in ISH and IDH than SDH at all age groups. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, BMI and studied population showed that, compared with SDH, ISH had in average 4.1, 3.1 and 1.6-fold greater risk of WCH and 3.3, 3.6 and 2.0-fold greater risk of WUCH at younger, intermediate and older ages, whereas IDH had in average 2.3, 2.6 and 2.0-fold greater risk of WCH and 3.8, 3.2 and 3.8-fold greater risk of WUCH at younger, intermediate and older ages, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ISH and IDH were associated with higher prevalence of WCH and WUCH than SDH across all age spectrum. In addition, treated and untreated ISH individuals with age less than 60 years and treated IDH individuals of all ages had the highest risk of having WCH phenotypes.

Effect of Wave Reflection and Arterial Stiffness on the Risk of Development of Hypertension in Japanese Men

Background

We conducted analyses of repeated‐measures data to examine whether pressure wave reflection acts additively or synergistically with arterial stiffness in the pathogenesis of hypertension.

Methods and Results

In 3172 middle‐aged (42±9 years) healthy Japanese men without hypertension at the study baseline, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity, and radial augmentation index were measured annually during a 9‐year study period. Of these, 474 participants (15%) developed hypertension by the end of the study period. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant individual odds ratios for both baseline brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity and radial augmentation index for the development of hypertension. The rate of onset of hypertension during the study period was highest in the participant group with high values for both brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity and radial augmentation index at study baseline (262 of 965 participants: 27%). The generalized estimating equation analysis revealed that both radial augmentation index (estimate=0.06, SE=0.03, P=0.05) and brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (estimate=0.07×10⁻¹, SE=0.02×10⁻¹, P<0.01) showed significant longitudinal association with new onset of hypertension, with no significant interaction.

Conclusions

In Japanese men, abnormal wave reflection and increased arterial stiffness may be additively associated with the risk of new onset of hypertension. Abnormal wave reflection and elevated central blood pressure may be longitudinally associated with increase in arterial stiffness, and this longitudinal association may be a mechanism underlying the additive effect of these 2 variables on the risk of new onset of hypertension.

Central pressures and central hemodynamic values in white coat hypertensives are closer to those of normotensives than to those of controlled hypertensives for similar age, gender, and 24-h and nocturnal blood pressures

INTRODUCTION

There is disagreement whether white coat hypertensives (WCH) have different hemodynamic and structural characteristics compared to normotensives (NT) and hypertensives (HT).

METHODS

We compared cardiovascular prognostic markers (pulse wave velocity [PWV] and aortic stiffness index [ASI]) and data on central hemodynamics and central pressures (augmentation index [AIx], augmentation pressure [AugP] and pulse pressure amplification [PPA]) from aortic pulse wave analysis between NT (n=175), WCH (n=315) and treated HT (n=691), all with 24-h blood pressure (BP) <130/80 and nocturnal BP <120/70 mmHg after matching for age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and and nocturnal BP. The groups were also compared separately in terms of 24-h systolic BP <120 mmHg and 120-129 mmHg.

RESULTS

The percentage of non-dippers was 40.1% in NT, 34.5% in WCH and 38.3 in HT. For similar 24-h and nocturnal systolic BP (NT 109/64±7/5, WCH 110/66±7/6, HT 109/64±7/5 mmHg), aortic stiffness was greater in HT (n=691, PWV 10.8±2.6 m/s and ASI 0.33±0.16, p<0.01) than in WCH (n=316, PWV 9.7±2.4 m/s and ASI 0.28±0.17) and NT (n=175, PWV 9.5±2.0 m/s and ASI 0.29±0.15); AugP and AIx were higher (p<0.01) in HT (13.9±8.2 and 29.6±12.6 mmHg) than in WCH (11.5±8.5 mmHg and 24.9±15.2) and NT (11.0±6.4 mmHg and 26.6±11.5). PPA was lower (p<0.01) in HT (11.3±5.5 mmHg) than in WCH (13.2±7.1 mmHg) and in NT (12.4±4.9 mmHg). The findings were similar when the 24-h systolic BP <120 mmHg and 120-129 mmHg subgroups were analyzed separately.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that for similar age, gender distribution, BMI, and 24-h and nocturnal BP, aortic stiffness, central aortic pressures and wave reflection in WCH are closer to those of NT than to those with treated HT. This supports the idea that white coat hypertension may be a more benign condition than treated hypertension for similar 24-h and particularly nocturnal BP levels.

Vitamin D levels in white coat and sustained hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The plasma levels of vitamin D in patients with white coat hypertension (WCHT) have not been studied previously. The aim of this study was to evaluate vitamin D levels in WCHT and compare with sustained hypertension (SHT) and with normotension (NT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-three normotensive, 42 WCHT, and 59 SHT patients were recruited in this study. The participants were matched for age, sex, and BMI. The vitamin D levels were determined using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method.

RESULTS

Plasma vitamin D levels were significantly lower in SHT than in the WCHT and NT groups (26.4±4.9, 34.3±3.6, and 36±5 ng/ml, respectively), and were similar in the WCHT and NT groups. There was a negative correlation between vitamin D levels and blood pressure parameters such as clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP), clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 24-h SBP, 24-h DBP, daytime SBP, daytime DBP, night-time SBP, and night-time DBP (r=-0.554, -0.419, -0.629, -0.427, -0.559, -0.534, -0.607, -0.462, respectively, and all P<0.001) in the entire study group. Clinic SBP (B±SE=-0.97±0.037, P=0.009) and 24-h SBP (B±SE=-0.138±0.055, P=0.013) were identified as predictors for vitamin D levels in the entire study group.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that sustained hypertensive patients have lower vitamin D levels than white coat hypertensive and normotensive individuals. White coat hypertensive patients without other cardiovascular risk factors have higher vitamin D levels than sustained hypertensive patients, suggesting that they have a lower cardiovascular risk.

Closer look at white-coat hypertension

This review aims to clarify novel concepts regarding the clinical and laboratory aspects of white-coat hypertension (WCHT). Recent studies on the clinical and biological implications of WCHT were compared with existing knowledge. Studies were included if the WCHT patients were defined according to the 2013 European Society of Hypertension guidelines, i.e., an office blood pressure (BP) of ≥ 140/90 mmHg, a home BP of ≤ 135/85 mmHg, and a mean 24-h ambulatory BP of ≤ 130/80 mmHg. WCHT studies published since 2000 were selected, although a few studies performed before 2000 were used for comparative purposes. True WCHT was defined as normal ABPM and home BP readings, and partial WCHT was defined as an abnormality in one of these two readings. The reported prevalence of WCHT was 15%-45%. The incidence of WCHT tended to be higher in females and in non-smokers. Compared with normotensive (NT) patients, WCHT was associated with a higher left ventricular mass index, higher lipid levels, impaired fasting glucose, and decreased arterial compliance. The circadian rhythm in WCHT patients was more variable than in NT patient’s, with a higher pulse pressure and non-dipping characteristics. Compared with sustained hypertension patients, WCHT patients have a better 10-year prognosis; compared with NT patients, WCHT patients have a similar stroke risk, but receive more frequent drug treatment. There are conflicting results regarding WCHT and markers of endothelial damage, oxidative stress and inflammation, and the data imply that WCHT patients may have a worse prognosis. Nitric oxide levels are lower, and oxidative stress parameters are higher in WCHT patients than in NT patients, whereas the antioxidant capacity is lower in WCHT patients than in NT patients. Clinicians should be aware of the risk factors associated with WCHT and patients should be closely monitored especially to identify target organ damage and metabolic syndrome.

Sex differences in primary hypertension

Men have higher blood pressure than women through much of life regardless of race and ethnicity. This is a robust and highly conserved sex difference that it is also observed across species including dogs, rats, mice and chickens and it is found in induced, genetic and transgenic animal models of hypertension. Not only do the differences between the ovarian and testicular hormonal milieu contribute to this sexual dimorphism in blood pressure, the sex chromosomes also play a role in and of themselves. This review primarily focuses on epidemiological studies of blood pressure in men and women and experimental models of hypertension in both sexes. Gaps in current knowledge regarding what underlie male-female differences in blood pressure control are discussed. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying sex differences in hypertension may lead to the development of anti-hypertensives tailored to one's sex and ultimately to improved therapeutic strategies for treating this disease and preventing its devastating consequences.

Diagnosis and management of patients with white-coat and masked hypertension

White-coat hypertension is characterized by an elevation in clinic blood pressure but normal home or ambulatory blood-pressure values, whereas patients with masked hypertension have normal clinic blood pressure and elevated ambulatory or home blood-pressure load. Both white-coat and masked hypertension are frequent clinical entities that need appropriate recognition and a close diagnostic follow-up. White-coat and masked hypertension seem to be associated with organ damage and increased cardiovascular risk, although not invariably. In addition, patients with masked or white-coat hypertension have an increased risk of abnormalities affecting their glucose and lipid profiles. Therefore, the diagnosis of these conditions should be accurate and include the assessment of cardiovascular as well as of metabolic risk. Once diagnosed, first-line therapeutic interventions should be nonpharmacological and aim at lifestyle changes, but drug treatment can be indicated, particularly when the patient's cardiovascular risk profile is elevated or when target-organ damage is detected.

White-coat hypertension in the elderly. Echocardiographic analysis. A substudy of the EPICARDIAN project

The aims of this study were to investigate echocardiographic abnormalities in the elderly and to evaluate differences between those who are normotensive and those who have white-coat hypertension or sustained hypertension. The study used data on a subsample of participants in the EPICARDIAN project who came from the Lista district of Madrid, Spain. Of the 271 included, 61 (22.5%) were normotensive, 81 (29.9%) had white-coat hypertension and 129 (49.6%) had sustained hypertension. The left ventricular mass index was significantly different between the subgroups: 94.9 g/m2 in normotensives, 125.6 g/m2 in those with white-coat hypertension and 136.3 g/m2 in those with sustained hypertension (P< .001). The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, defined using Deveraux's criteria, was 13.2% in normotensives, 49.1% in those with white-coat hypertension and 54.3% in those with sustained hypertension (P=.00007). White-coat hypertension is not a innocuous finding in the elderly because its implications for cardiac health are closer to those of sustained hypertension than to those of normal blood pressure.

Serum phosphate in white-coat hypertensive patients: focus on dipping status and metabolic syndrome

Recent studies indicate an association between serum phosphate levels and blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A growing body of evidence suggests that white-coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with target organ damage. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome (MS) and a non-dipping pattern are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to explore the nocturnal blood pressure fall in patients with WCH according to their serum phosphate levels and number of MS components fulfilled. The study included 2600 patients with WCH who attended our outpatient clinics. All patients underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Dipping pattern was defined as follows: 'dippers' had a nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) fall > or =10% but <20%; 'non-dippers' had an NSBP fall <10%; 'extreme dippers' had an NSBP fall > or =20% and 'reverse dippers' had an NSBP increase. There were 314 extreme dippers, 1337 dippers, 734 non-dippers and 116 reverse dippers. Reverse dippers presented with significantly lower levels of serum phosphate, whereas extreme dippers had significantly higher levels (3.39+/-3.29 vs. 3.58+/-3.52 mg per 100 ml, P<0.0001). The patients were classified according to the number of MS components and the main observation was the inverse relationship of serum phosphate with MS components (3.53+/-0.36, 3.50+/-0.38, 3.49+/-0.38, 3.44+/-0.36 and 3.35+/-0.31 mg per 100 ml, respectively, P=0.003). Patients with WCH and low serum phosphate levels appear to have a higher incidence of a non-dipping NSBP profile and an impaired metabolic profile. This observation may be important for the stratification of the cardiovascular risk in WCH patients.

Increased long-term risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in white-coat and masked hypertension

OBJECTIVE

A sustained blood pressure elevation is associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus. Whether this is the case also in white-coat and masked hypertension is unknown.

METHODS

In 1412 individuals of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni study stratified for sex and age decades, we measured office, home and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure together with fasting plasma glucose and other metabolic variables. This allowed to identify patients with white-coat, masked, sustained hypertension and true normotension.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year period, the increase in plasma glucose and the incidence of new-onset diabetes (plasma glucose > or =126 mg/dl or use of antidiabetic drugs) was significantly greater in individuals with white-coat and masked hypertension than in those with 'true' normotension (age and sex-adjusted risk 2.9 and 2.7, respectively), the increase being similar to that of sustained hypertensive individuals. The adjusted risk showed a marked increase when development of an impaired fasting glucose condition was also considered, and the results were similar when individuals reporting antihypertensive drug treatment were excluded or white-coat and masked hypertension were identified by office versus home blood pressure. The increased risk of new-onset diabetes become no more significant when data were adjusted for initial blood glucose and BMI, which, at a multivariate analysis, were the most significant predictors of this condition, with only a small although significant contribution of the initial blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Thus, white-coat and masked hypertension are associated with a long-term greater progression of blood glucose abnormalities and an increased risk of developing diabetes. This is largely accounted for by the metabolic abnormalities that are frequent components of these conditions.

Nocturnal blood pressure fall and metabolic syndrome score in patients with white coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Accumulating data report that white coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with target organ damage. Metabolic syndrome (MS), and nondipping pattern is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to explore the nocturnal blood pressure fall in WCH patients according to their MS score.

METHODS

The study comprised 2300 patients with WCH who attended our outpatient clinics. All underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria and patients were classified into five groups: group I (hypertension), group II (hypertension and any one component), group III (hypertension and any two components), group IV (hypertension and any three components), and group V (all five components). Dipping pattern was defined as 'dippers' with nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) fall greater than or equal to 10% but less than 20%, 'nondippers' with NSBP fall greater than or equal to 0% but less than 10%, 'extreme dippers' with NSBP fall greater than or equal to 20%, and 'reverse dippers' with NSBP increase.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (n=522) and absence (n=1778) of MS. The overall prevalence of MS in the study population was 22.7%. Comparing the non-MS group with the MS we observed significant differences for nondippers (24.5% vs. 38.9%, P<0.001), dippers (54.4% vs. 43.5%, P<0.001), extreme dippers (17.8% vs. 11.3%, P<0.001), and reverse dippers (3.3% vs. 6.3%, P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Patients with WCH and increased number of MS components present with elevated nighttime SBP levels. This observation is of a great significance in the assessment of the cardiovascular risk in these patients.

The association of waist circumference with ambulatory blood pressure is independent of alternative adiposity indices

AIM

The relationship between waist circumference (WC) and conventional blood pressure (BP) is independent of other clinical indices of adiposity. As ambulatory BP may offer more prognostic information than conventional BP, we aimed to identify whether indices of central adiposity are associated with ambulatory BP independent of other indices of adiposity.

METHODS

The relationship between indices of adiposity [WC, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index (BMI) or skin-fold thickness] and ambulatory or conventional BP was determined in 300 randomly selected individuals of African descent living in an urban developing community in South Africa. Relationships were determined with multiple indices of adiposity in the same regression model and after adjusting for age, gender, alcohol and tobacco intake, the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus or inappropriate blood glucose control [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)], antihypertensive therapy and menopausal status.

RESULTS

Sixty-five per cent of participants were overweight or obese. With respect to the relationships between indices of adiposity, BMI and WC showed the strongest correlation (r=0.84, P<0.0001). After including all indices of adiposity and confounders in the model, WC was the only clinical index of adiposity which independently predicted 24-h (partial r=0.15, P<0.005) and conventional (partial r=0.14, P<0.005) systolic BP and 24-h (partial r=0.13, P<0.02) and conventional (partial r=0.40, P<0.0001) diastolic BP. After adjusting for other adiposity indices and confounders, every 1 SD (15 cm) increase in WC resulted in a 4.04 mmHg increase in 24-h systolic BP and a 4.33 mmHg increase in 24-h diastolic BP. Similar results were obtained in the subgroup of 237 participants not receiving antihypertensive therapy.

CONCLUSION

WC is the only clinical index of adiposity that is associated with 24-h and conventional BP independent of other adiposity indices in a community with a high prevalence of obesity.

Impaired arterial elasticity in young patients with white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Conflict still exists over whether patients with white-coat hypertension are at increased risk of developing target organ damage compared with normotensive individuals.

METHODS

We studied vascular distensibility in 117 young-to-middle age patients with white-coat hypertension, 174 patients with sustained hypertension, and 51 normotensive controls. To obtain a measure of compliance, a model was used that divides the total systemic compliance into large artery (C1) and small artery (C2) compliance. With this aim, radial arterial pulse waves were recorded with a tonometer sensor array by means of an HDI CR2000 device (Eagan, Minnesota, USA). Moreover, pulse wave velocity and the augmentation index were measured using the Specaway DAT system (St Pauls, Sydney, Australia).

RESULTS

Patients with sustained hypertension had a greater body mass index than patients with white-coat hypertension (P=0.04) or the normotensive individuals (P=0.01). C1 and C2 were decreased in the two hypertensive groups as compared with those in the normotensive group (P=0.0002 and 0.03, respectively, versus sustained hypertension; P=0.00007 and 0.0004, respectively, versus white-coat hypertension). Pulse wave velocity and aortic augmentation index were increased in the white-coat hypertension patients compared with the normotensive individuals (P=0.02 and 0.004, respectively). Aortic augmentation index (P=0.008) but not pulse wave velocity was increased in the sustained hypertensive patients compared with that in the normotensive individuals. All indexes of arterial distensibility were similar in the two hypertensive groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Indexes of arterial distensibility are impaired in the white-coat hypertensive group and similar to those in the sustained hypertensive group, indicating that early changes in the arterial wall can occur in white-coat hypertension. This may account for the higher risk of stroke that has been described in this condition.

White-coat hypertension in adults

White-coat hypertension is defined by the coexistence of persistently high office blood pressure (BP) with normal self-measured or ambulatory blood pressure. The prognostic impact of white-coat hypertension is a subject of debate. Cardiovascular morbidity seems to be lower in white-coat hypertension than in ambulatory hypertension, and, according to some but not all studies, is not dissimilar between white-coat hypertension and clinical normotension. In a large collaborative study including individual data from four prospective cohort studies, the incidence of stroke tended to increase in the white-coat hypertension group in the long run, crossing the hazard curve of the ambulatory hypertension by the ninth year of follow-up. These data raise the hypothesis, to be tested in future studies, that white-coat hypertension might not be a benign condition for stroke in the long term. Further studies are needed in order to: (1) test whether white-coat hypertension is really a benign condition for stroke in the long term; (2) compare, in patients with white-coat hypertension, a regimen based on life-style measures without drugs and a standard regimen consisting of life-style measures with the possible addition of drugs. On the basis of current evidence, it is reasonable to suggest a treatment based on life-style measures in the low-risk stratum of patients with white-coat hypertension under the conditions of correct definition, absence of comorbid conditions and target-organ damage, and adequate follow-up

Prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure value: from the Japan Home versus Office Measurement Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure values.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 3303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive treatment in Japan. Information on the characteristics of the patients was collected by a physician's self-administrated questionnaire. The office blood pressure value was calculated as the average of the four readings in two visits. All patients were asked to measure their blood pressure once every morning and once every evening. In the study, we included patients with at least three measurements in the morning and in the evening, respectively. The average of all home blood pressure values was taken as the home blood pressure value.

RESULTS

The mean value of home systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 136.8/79.3 mmHg, and the mean value of office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142.8/80.6 mmHg. Of the 3303 patients, 758 (23.0%) had controlled hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 628 (19.0%) had masked uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 640 (19.4%) had treated white-coat hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg), and 1277 (38.7%) had uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Treated white-coat hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were often observed in clinical settings. Physicians need to understand the prevalence of such patients to prevent inadequate diagnosis and treatment in them.

Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the prognosis in subjects with "white-coat" hypertension (WCHT) and "masked" hypertension (MHT), in which blood pressure (BP) is lower in clinical measurements than during ambulatory monitoring.

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of WCHT remains controversial, and little is known about MHT.

METHODS

We obtained 24-h ambulatory BP and "casual" BP (i.e., obtained in clinical scenarios) values from 1,332 subjects (872 women, 460 men) > or =40 years old in a representative sample of the general population of a Japanese community. Survival and stroke morbidity were then followed up for a mean duration of 10 years.

RESULTS

Composite risk of cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity examined using a Cox proportional hazards regression model for subjects with WCHT (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg; relative hazards [RH])1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 2.14) was no different from risk for subjects with sustained normal BP (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg). However, risk was significantly higher for subjects with MHT (casual BP <140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.13; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.29) or sustained hypertension (casual BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, daytime BP > or =135/85 mm Hg; RH 2.26; 95% CI 1.49 to 3.41) than for subjects with sustained normal BP. Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular mortality and stroke morbidity among subgroups by gender, use of antihypertensive medication, and risk factor level (all p for heterogeneity >0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional BP measurements may not identify some individuals at high or low risk, but these people may be identifiable by the use of ambulatory BP.

Hyperhomocysteinemia: an additional risk factor in white coat hypertension

The association between homocysteine and sustained hypertension (HT) has been studied. The aim of this study was to assess homocysteine levels in white coat hypertension (WCH) as an indicator of increased risk in the development of cardiovascular diseases. WCH was defined as clinical hypertension and a daytime ambulatory blood pressure of < 135/85 mmHg. Plasma levels of homocysteine were determined in patients with WCH, hypertension, and normotension (NT). The study group included 100 subjects, 33 with WCH (16 males, 17 females) aged 49.1 +/- 1.9; 35 sustained hypertensives (17 males,18 females) aged 48.5 +/- 1.7 and 32 normotensive control subjects (15 males, 17 females) aged 48.8 +/- 2.2. The subjects were matched for age, gender, and body mass index. Patients with a smoking habit, dyslipidemia, or diabetes mellitus were not included in the study. Homocysteine levels were analyzed by ELISA. Plasma homocysteine levels were significantly higher in the WCH group compared to the controls (12.32 +/- 1.07 versus 5.35 +/- 1.38 micromol/L; P < 0.001) and the WCH group had significantly lower homocysteine values than the hypertensives (19.03 +/- 0.76 micromol/L P < 0.001). Total cholesterol and tri-glycerides were not different among the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in urinary albumin excretion (UAE) or creatinine clearance between the three groups. Hypertensive retinopathy was observed in the WCH group, but was less severe and less frequent compared to HTs. LVMI was greater in the WCH group compared to the NTs, but significantly less than HTs. The data demonstrate that WCH is associated with high levels of homocysteine. The increase in homocysteine level in WCH is not as high as in SHT. Since an elevated plasma homocysteine level is a strong risk factor for coronary artery disease and there was target organ damage in our WCH group, we conclude that WCH should not be considered to be an innocent trait.

Sequential follow-up clinic and ambulatory blood pressure evaluation in a low risk population of white-coat hypertensive patients and in normotensives

BACKGROUND

In subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCH) it is unclear how ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) progresses over time and whether they exhibit an increased cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the transition of clinic and ABPM values in 39 clinic and ABPM normotensive subjects (NT) (clinic BP<140/90 mmHg and awake BP<130/85 mmHg, ages 43.4+/-2.6 y) and in 79 untreated subjects (47.2+/-2.4 y) with WCH (clinic BP>140/90, awake ABP<130/85 mmHg) with no other major cardiovascular risk factors. Ambulatory blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and on at least two further occasions during follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline all subjects were untreated and groups did not differ on values of metabolic parameters, BMI, left ventricular mass index, and ABPM values. Subjects were revaluated for ABPM half way through and at the end of follow-up, 35+/-3 and 86+/-4 months in NT and 49+/-4 and 90+/-4 months in WCH. Thirty-six WCH were on antihypertensive treatment (AH) after baseline until the end of follow-up (WCH-tr), whereas 43 WCH (WCH-untr) were free from AH throughout the study. In a similar way all groups showed a significant (p<0.01) progressive increase in 24-h ABPM systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline throughout the follow-up in NT (+4.9/2.1+/-0.8/0.9 mmHg), average annual increase of 0.72/0.37 mmHg/y, in WCH-tr (+ 5.0/1.2+/-1.1/1.5 mmHg), average annual increase of 0.66/0.31 mmHg/y and in WCH-untr (+5.4/3.2+/-0.9/1.1 mmHg), average annual increase of 0.74/0.39 mmHg/y. During the follow-up office SBP/DBP (mmHg) significantly rose in NT (+5.7/3.9) but was reduced in WCH-tr (-7.8/5.2) and in WCH-untr (-4.7/1.1). Development of ambulatory hypertension (daytime BP >130 and/or >85 mmHg) occurred in 15.4% (6/39) of NT, in 22.7% (8/36) of WCH-tr and in 26.1% (11/43) of WCH-untr (NS). First cardiovascular events recorded were three in subjects with WCH and none in NT.

CONCLUSIONS

After 7.4 years of follow-up, both the progressive increase in ABPM and the rate of transition to ambulatory hypertension in subjects with WCH (either treated or untreated), who were selected under strict criteria were similar to that of normotensive subjects. Also there was no evidence that WCH exhibited a clear higher risk of development cardiovascular events.

Endothelium and angiogenesis in white coat hypertension

Hypertensive patients are at particular risk of cardiovascular complications, possibly related to endothelial damage or dysfunction, or to abnormal angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to compare the risk conferred by white coat hypertension (WCH) vs sustained hypertension in the development of the endothelial dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis by evaluating nitric oxide (NO=NO2+NO3), endothelin-1 (ET-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and E-selectin levels in plasma. The study group included 102 subjects, 34 with WCH (17 male and 17 female patients) aged 49+/-11 years, 34 sustained hypertensives (HT) (15 male and 19 female patients) aged 47+/-11 years and 34 normotensive control subjects (NT) (16 male and 18 female patients) aged 48+/-10 years. WCH was defined as clinical hypertension and daytime ambulatory blood pressure less than 135/85 mmHg. The subjects were matched for age, gender, body mass index and the patients with smoking habit, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. The NO, ET-1, VEGF and E-selectin levels were analysed by ELISA technique. The WCH subjects had significantly higher levels of NO than the HT (41.68+/-2.23 vs 32.18+/-2.68 micromol/l; P<0.001) and significantly lower values than the NT (48.24+/-4.29 micromol/l; P<0.001). ET-1 levels of the WCH group were significantly higher than the NT (8.10+/-0.92 vs 5.95+/-0.26 ng/ml; P<0.001) and significantly lower than the HT (11.46+/-0.59 ng/ml; P<0.001). Considering with VEGF, the WCH group had significantly higher levels than the NT (195.88+/-11.84 vs 146.26+/-18.67 pg/ml; P<0.001), but the difference from the HT group was not significant (203.35+/-7.48 pg/ml; P=0.062). E-selectin in the WCH group was significantly lower than the HT (4.77+/-0.52 vs 8.49+/-2.85; P<0.001), but the difference from the NT group was not significant (3.86+/-0.67; P=0.077). Our data demonstrate that WCH is associated with endothelial dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis. The degree of these changes is not as severe as observed in hypertensive population.

White-coat hypertension: a clinical review

White-coat hypertension (WCHT), also called 'isolated office or clinic hypertension', is defined as the occurrence of blood pressure (BP) values higher than normal when measured in the medical environment, but within the normal range during daily life, usually defined as average daytime ambulatory BP (ABP) or home BP values (<135 mm Hg systolic and <85 mm Hg diastolic). The prevalence of WCHT varies from 15% to over 50% of all patients with mildly elevated office BP (OBP) values. In untreated hypertensive patients, the probability of WCHT especially increases with female gender and a mildly elevated OBP level. The value of other possible determinants such as (non) smoking status, duration of hypertension, left ventricular mass, number of OBP measurements, educational level, etc. is less consistently shown. Although, for various reasons, studies evaluating the long-term effects of WCHT are not always easy to interpret, most data indicate that persons with WCHT have a worse or equal cardiovascular prognosis than normotensives, but a better one than those with sustained hypertension. WCHT is sometimes considered a prehypertensive state, but data on the long-term evolution of subjects with WCHT are scarce. Patients with WCHT and a high cardiovascular risk or proven target organ damage should be pharmacologically treated. Subjects with uncomplicated WCHT should probably not receive medical therapy, but a close follow-up, including regular assessment of other risk factors and measurement of OBP (every 6 months) and ABP (every 1 or 2 years), is warranted.

Target organ damage and changes in arterial compliance in white coat hypertension. Is white coat innocent?

The aim of this study was to perform an extensive evaluation of target organ status, metabolic abnormalities and hemodynamic alterations in white coat hypertension (WCH). Fifty normotensive (NT), 90 WCH (ambulatory daytime blood pressure < 135/85 mmHg) and 101 hypertensive (HT) subjects underwent extensive biochemical, echocardiographic, fundoscopic examination. In a subgroup study, arterial compliance and intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured by Doppler ultrasound in left common carotid artery. WCH subjects were found to have higher body mass index (BMI) than the NTs (p = 0.042). Left ventricle mass index (LVMI) was greater in the WCHs than the NTs (p < 0.001), but significantly less than the HTs (p < 0.001). Hypertensive retinopathy was observed in the WCHs, but was less severe and rare compared to the HTs (13% vs 27%). Both WCHs and HTs had high levels of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (p = not significant). Total cholesterol was higher in WCHs than in the NTs (p = 0.04) The distensibility coefficient (DC) of the WCHs was significantly greater than the HTs (p < 0.01), while significantly smaller than the NTs (p < 0.01). The compliance coefficient (CC) of the WCHs was significantly higher than the HTs (p < 0.01), and significantly less than the NTs (p < 0.01). The IMT in the HTs was significantly higher than the WCHs (0.81 +/- 0.05 vs 0.70 +/- 0.04 mm; p < 0.001) and the NTs (p < 0.001). The difference between the NTs and the WCHs was not significant. Our data indicate that patients with WCH represent an intermediate group between NTs and sustained HTs where target organ damage and cardiovascular risk is concerned.

White coat hypertension is a cardiovascular risk factor: a 10-year follow-up study

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the cardiovascular risk in white coat hypertension (WCH). WCH is a well-known clinical entity defined by persistently elevated blood pressure (BP) in the doctor's office, whereas BP in other conditions is normal. The prognosis of WCH is unsettled, although two prospective studies that include normal control groups imply that the condition is benign. This study is a 10-year follow-up study on 420 patients with grade I-II hypertension newly diagnosed by their general practitioner and 146 normal controls (NTs). Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring was performed at baseline. With our protocollated cutoff value of daytime-ABP <135/90 mmHg, 76 (18.1%) of the 420 hypertensives were white coat hypertensives (WCHs) and 344 were established hypertensives (EHs). With a lower cutoff of 135/85 mmHg, 40 (9.5%) were WCHs. Complete follow-up data were obtained for all 566 subjects. The mean duration of follow-up was 10.2 years (range 9.0-12.5). In the WCH group, 14 first events were recorded (18.4%) consisting of two cardiovascular deaths and 12 nonfatal cardiovascular events. In the EH group, the corresponding number of events were 56 first events (16.3%), 12 cardiovascular deaths and 44 nonfatal cardiovascular events, and in the NT group 10 first events (6.8%), two cardiovascular deaths and eight nonfatal cardiovascular events. The event rate was similar in the WCH group and the EH group and significantly lower in the NT group (P<0.05). When corrected for daytime-ABP, age and other confounders, the difference remained statistically significant. When using the lower cutoff of 135/85 mmHg, WCH was still associated with a significantly higher cardiovascular event rate. In conclusion, the main finding of this 10-year follow-up study is an increased cardiovascular risk in WCH compared to normotensive controls.

White Coat Hypertension in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The strength of the association between obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and systemic hypertension could be affected by methodologic problems in the definition of hypertension.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of white coat hypertension (WCH) in patients with OSAHS, and to analyze the characteristics of patients with OSASH and WCH.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-nine consecutive patients with OSAHS and 20 healthy control subjects were included into the study. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and urinary catecholamines were determined simultaneously with the polysomnographic study. Arterial blood gases and lung volumes were also measured.

RESULTS

Office hypertension was diagnosed in 45 patients, while the control group included 54 normotensive patients with OSAHS. After ABPM, hypertension was confirmed in 30 patients with OSAHS and office hypertension. WCH was diagnosed in the remaining 15 patients (33%). Patients with WCH presented higher values of sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset than normotensive and sustained hypertensive patients. No other differences in sleep parameters, function tests, or urinary catecholamines were found between the OSAHS groups.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that WCH is a frequent phenomenon in patients with OSAHS, and that it is not predictable by clinical variables.

White-Coat Hypertension Contributes to the Presence of Carotid Arteriosclerosis

It remains unclear whether white-coat hypertension is associated with vascular organ damage (e.g., carotid arteriosclerosis) in the same way sustained hypertension is. We therefore compared the progression of carotid arteriosclerosis among Japanese individuals showing normal blood pressures, sustained hypertension or white-coat hypertension. A total of 30 subjects (mean age, 58 years) with white-coat hypertension, 30 (mean age, 54 years) with untreated sustained hypertension who had no plaque formation in the carotid arteries, and 30 normotensive subjects (mean age, 58 years) were enrolled in this study. The white-coat and sustained hypertensive subjects were matched with respect to their clinical blood pressures, but their ambulatory blood pressures differed. Conversely, white-coat hypertensive and normotensive subjects were matched with respect to ambulatory blood pressures, but their clinical blood pressures differed. Carotid intimal-medial thickness was measured by B-mode ultrasonography, and the cross-sectional area of the common carotid artery was calculated. The three groups were similar with respect to age, sex ratio, height, laboratory data and the incidence of smoking. Body weights and body mass indexes were significantly higher among patients with sustained hypertension than among either normotensive or white-coat hypertensive patients. Intimal-medial thicknesses and carotid cross-sectional areas were similar in patients with white-coat and sustained hypertension and significantly higher than in normotensive subjects. Collectively, these findings suggest that white-coat hypertension contributed to the presence of carotid arteriosclerosis in our subjects in a manner similar to sustained hypertension. Thus, clinical evaluation of white-coat hypertension should be conducted with the potential for target organ damage in mind.

Circulating homocysteine levels in sustained and white coat hypertension

Although white coat hypertension has been widely studied in the last years, its risk profile is not yet completely clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate circulating homocysteine levels, an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, in subjects with white coat and sustained hypertension. We selected 31 sustained hypertensive subjects, 31 white coat hypertensive subjects and 31 normotensive subjects matched for age, gender, body mass index and occupation. Women were also matched for menopausal status. Subjects with smoking habit, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study. White coat hypertension was defined as clinical hypertension and daytime ambulatory blood pressure <135/85 mmHg. Blood samples were drawn after a fasting period of 12 h for routine laboratory tests and homocysteine determination. Homocysteine levels were evaluated by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Creatinine, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides were not different among the groups. White coat hypertensive subjects had significantly lower homocysteine levels than sustained hypertensive patients (8.2+/-2.0 vs 12.6+/-3.9 micromol/l, P=0.0003). No significant difference was observed between white coat hypertensive and normotensive subjects regarding this parameter (8.2+/-2.0 vs 7.6+/-1.9 micromol/l, P=0.9). In conclusion, our data show that middle-aged white coat hypertensive subjects without other cardiovascular risk factors have lower circulating homocysteine levels than sustained hypertensive patients suggesting that they are at lower cardiovascular risk.

Indirect arterial blood pressure measurement in nonsedated Irish wolfhounds: reference values for the breed

Arterial blood pressure measurements were obtained from 158 healthy Irish wolfhounds using the oscillometric technique to establish reference values for the breed. In contrast to other sight hounds, Irish wolfhounds have low arterial blood pressure. Mean systolic pressure for the group was 116.0 mm Hg. Mean diastolic pressure was 69.2 mm Hg, and the mean value for mean arterial pressure was 87.8 mm Hg. Blood pressure measurements were higher in older wolfhounds than in young dogs. There was no difference between systolic and mean arterial blood pressures in lateral recumbency compared to standing position. However, diastolic pressure was slightly lower when standing. Calm dogs had lower pressure than anxious wolfhounds. There was a significant interaction between the effects of age, gender, and mood on systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure values.

Sympathetic neural mechanisms in white-coat hypertension

OBJECTIVES

This study planned to establish whether sympathetic hyperactivity exists in white-coat hypertension (WHT) in the clinical setting, relative to matched groups with normotension (NT) and untreated essential hypertension (EHT).

BACKGROUND

White-coat hypertension differs from EHT by the presence of normal ambulatory blood pressure. Sympathetic hyperactivity exists in patients with EHT in the clinical setting and is believed to contribute to the development of target organ damage. Similar organ damage has been reported in WHT, yet little is known about sympathetic neural activity in this condition.

METHODS

Using microneurography, we examined groups of 12 matched subjects with WHT, EHT and NT during the same clinical setting to quantify muscle sympathetic nerve activity as multiunit discharge (MSNA) and single units (s-MSNA).

RESULTS

The s-MSNA in WHT (54 +/- 4.2 impulses/100 beats) was greater (p < 0.05) than in NT (37 +/- 5.4 impulses/100 beats) despite similar age and body mass index (BMI). The EHT values of s-MSNA (73 +/- 5.2 impulses/100 beats) were significantly (p < 0.05) greater than in WHT despite similar age, BMI and blood pressure levels. The MSNA followed a similar trend. White-coat hypertension had a similar cardiac baroreceptor reflex sensitivity to NT, but this was impaired in EHT relative to both NT and WHT.

CONCLUSIONS

It was shown, in the clinical setting, that central sympathetic hyperactivity exists in WHT, albeit to a lesser degree than EHT. These findings suggest that WHT may not be entirely benign and that the observed sympathetic hyperactivity may be responsible for development of target organ damage in this group of patients.

Talking effect and "white coat" effect in hypertensive patients: physical effort or emotional content?

Talking has been shown to increase blood pressure instantaneously in hypertensive patients and to contribute to the white coat effect. The effects of talking were compared with those of counting aloud in 64 patients with essential hypertension who were randomly assigned to a period of stress talking and a period of counting aloud (active periods), alternating with three periods of silence (control). The same monitor was used for office measurements and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure analysis. Systolic/diastolic blood pressures increased significantly more during talking (163/110 mmHg) than during counting aloud (152/102 mmHg, both p < .0001) in both treated and untreated patients and in sustained and clinical hypertension. Talking had a residual effect on systolic blood pressure that lasted 5.8 +/- 0.1 minutes. The emotional content seemed to be the only cause of the talking effect. Its instantaneous and residual effects on blood pressure and heart rate should be considered when measuring these variables.

Clinic and ambulatory heart rate in sustained and white-coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Sustained and white-coat hypertensives show hypertension in the office setting but different blood pressure values outside the clinical environment. So far, only a few incomplete data on heart rate are available inside and outside the clinical setting in these groups of patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinic and ambulatory heart in sustained hypertensives, white-coat hypertensives and normotensives.

METHODS

We selected 236 sustained hypertensives, 236 white-coat hypertensives and 236 normotensives matched for age, gender and body mass index, and with a similar occupation. The subjects had been submitted to clinic evaluation and the non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure and heart rate. White-coat hypertension was defined as clinic hypertension and a daytime blood pressure of less than 135/85 mmHg.

RESULTS

The clinic heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives and white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives (76 +/- 11 versus 75.5 +/- 10 versus 70 +/- 9 beats/min [bpm], respectively, P < 0.05). The daytime heart rate was significantly higher in sustained hypertensives than in white-coat hypertensives and normotensives (79.4 +/- 10 versus 74.6 +/- 8.5 versus 74.5 +/- 8.5 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05), as were the night-time heart rate (67 +/- 8.5 versus 63 +/- 8 versus 63 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05) and 24 h heart rate (76.3 +/- 9 versus 72 +/- 7.8 versus 72 +/- 8 bpm, respectively, P < 0.05). When men and women were analyzed separately, the same trend was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinic heart rate is similar in sustained and white-coat hypertensives, but the ambulatory heart rate is lower in white-coat hypertensives. As ambulatory heart rate is more representative of 24 h heart rate load and may be a better indicator of the detrimental effect of heart rate, our findings suggest that white-coat hypertensives are at lower cardiovascular risk than sustained hypertensives.

Silent and clinically overt stroke in older Japanese subjects with white-coat and sustained hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether white-coat hypertension is a risk factor for stroke in relation to silent cerebral infarct (SCI) in an older Japanese population.

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether white-coat hypertension in older subjects is a benign condition or is associated with an increased risk of stroke.

METHODS

We studied the prognosis for stroke in 958 older Japanese subjects (147 normotensives [NT], 236 white-coat hypertensives [WCHT] and 575 sustained hypertensives [SHT]) in whom ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in the absence of antihypertensive treatment. In 585 subjects (61%), we also assessed SCI using brain magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Silent cerebral infarcts were found in 36% of NT (n = 70), 42% of WCHT (n = 154), and 53% of SHT (n = 361); multiple SCIs (the presence of > or =2 SCIs) were found in 24% of NT, 25% of WCHT and 39% of SHT. During a mean 42-month follow-up period, clinically overt strokes occurred in 62 subjects (NT: three [2.0%]; WCHT: five [2.1%]; SHT: 54 [9.4%]), with 14 fatal cases (NT: one [0.7%]; WCHT: 0 [0%]; SHT: 13 [2.3%]). A Cox regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.0001) and SHT (relative risk, [RR] [95% confidence interval, CI]: 4.3 [1.3-14.2], p = 0.018) were independent stroke predictors, whereas WCHT was not significant. When we added presence/absence of SCI at baseline into this model, the RR (95% CI) for SCI was 4.6 (2.0-10.5) (p = 0.003) and that of SHT was 5.5 (1.8-18.9) versus WCHT (p = 0.004) and 3.8 (0.88-16.7) versus NT (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In older subjects the incidence of stroke in WCHT is similar to that of NT and one-fourth the risk in SHT. Although SCI is a strong predictor of stroke, the difference in stroke prognosis between SHT and WCHT was independent of SCI. It is clinically important to distinguish WCHT from SHT even after assessment of target organ damage in the elderly.

Importance of various methods of blood pressure measurement in clinical trials

Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring and self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) are more reproducible than clinic BP measurement, minimize the white coat effect, and can reduce the sample size necessary to demonstrate the efficacy of a drug in clinical trials. For many years, the trough:peak ratio has been considered the key index for demonstrating the efficacy of antihypertensive agents. However, several potential problems are associated with the use of this index, and ABP monitoring makes it possible to examine changes in BP over the entire 24-hour period, not only at a preset time of peak effect and at the end of the dosing interval. The smoothness index provides more comprehensive information on the 24-hour BP control with treatment and avoids part of the problems encountered with the trough:peak ratio. One simple way to summarize the results of ABP monitoring in clinical trials is to provide the mean 24-hour BP difference from placebo and the BP decrease at trough. The numerous advantages summarized above make ABP monitoring an accepted method of BP measurement in hypertension therapy trials. Self-measurement of BP may be a valid and less expensive alternative to ABP monitoring.

Clinical value of microalbuminuria in hypertension

Microalbuminuria (MA) is a well recognized marker of cardiovascular complications in hypertension, but whether MA can predict adverse outcome in this clinical condition is still a subject for debate. The fact that in hypertensive cohorts those patients who showed an increase in albumin excretion rate also manifested an increased incidence of morbid events indicates that the presence of MA in hypertension may carry an increased cardiovascular risk. However, the prognostic significance of MA remains controversial because no results of prospective studies performed in hypertensive subjects without diabetes mellitus are available. Several factors can affect the prevalence of MA in hypertension, including severity of the disease, selection procedures, concomitant risk factors, degree of obesity, age, and sex distribution. This accounts for the large differences in the prevalence of MA that can be found in the literature, with prevalence rates going from a low of 4.7% to a high of 40%. There is still conflict over whether MA in hypertension is due to increased intraglomerular pressure or to glomerular damage. The data from the literature suggest that in subjects with mild hypertension the main determinant of albumin excretion rate is the haemodynamic load. In subjects with more severe hypertension and hypertensive complications, the augmented urinary albumin leak is probably the consequence of a systemic microvascular disturbance which involves the glomeruli. In this respect, the insulin resistance state often associated to high blood pressure appears as one of the main pathogenetic factors. Whether management of hypertensive populations may be improved by monitoring of albumin excretion rate and whether antihypertensive drugs which are more effective in decreasing urinary albumin can be more beneficial in patients with MA remains to be determined.

White coat hypertension in type 1 diabetic patients without nephropathy

The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) in type 1 diabetic patients. Therefore, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and 24-h urinary albumin excretion (UAE) were determined in 47 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (27 with new diagnosis of hypertension by office blood pressure (BP) measurement and 20 with normotension). WCH was diagnosed in 20 patients (74%). Patients with WCH presented higher values of systolic and diastolic BP and UAE than normotensive patients. The results indicate that in type 1 diabetes mellitus WCH is very frequent. Thus, WCH may represent a potential risk for the development of diabetic complications, mainly diabetic nephropathy.

Difference between office and ambulatory blood pressure or real white coat effect: does it matter in terms of prognosis?

OBJECTIVE

The blood pressure (BP) response to the doctor's visit, generally referred as the white coat (WC) response, is usually estimated by the difference between office BP (OBP) and ambulatory BP (ABP). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of this estimation. To that end, we compared the real WC effect and the estimated WC effect (OBP-ABP) in terms of magnitude and consequences on target organs.

DESIGN

The study comprised 88 patients referred for hypertension. The real WC effect was measured using a Finapres device and expressed as the maximal WC effect (Max WC) or the average WC effect (Aver WC). For the estimation of target organ damages, the whole hypertensive group was separated into two groups according to the medians of the Aver WC, the Max WC, and the estimated WC effects, successively. Left ventricular mass index, E to A mitral wave ratio and pulse wave velocity were compared between groups as were serum creatinine, cholesterol and glucose levels.

RESULTS

The estimated WC effect proved to be a bad index of the real response to the doctor's visit as assessed by their difference of magnitude between the two (20 +/- 17, 12 +/- 12 and 30 +/- 14 mmHg as estimated WC, Aver WC and Max WC effects, respectively), their loose correlations (r=0.31, P=0.004 between estimated WC and Aver WC effects; r=0.27, P=0.01 between estimated WC and Max WC effects), and finally by the fact that they were in agreement in less than two-thirds of the patients for the categorization of the WC response. Concerning target organ damages, no difference in terms of cardiac mass, diastolic function, arterial distensibility, renal function and cardiovascular risk profile could be discerned between the groups with a high and a low WC effect, either real or estimated, when age and ABP were taken into account.

CONCLUSION

The present work supports the view that the true WC effect and its estimation are not equivalent. However, the way in which the WC response is defined does not alter its effect on target organs or cardiovascular risk profile.

"White coat hypertension" in adolescents: increased values of urinary cortisol and endothelin

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether "white coat hypertension" (WCH) in adolescents is an innocent phenomenon or is associated with early changes of the vascular system and/or increased stress response, reflected in the urinary endothelin and cortisol values, respectively.

STUDY DESIGN

The study group included 36 subjects, 14 with WCH (8 males and 6 females) aged 12.9 +/- 3 years and 22 normotensive control subjects (12 males and 10 females) aged 13 +/- 3.5 years. WCH was defined as systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (BP) > or =95th percentile for age, sex, and height and with reported normal BP measurements at home. Urinary endothelin (UET1), urinary free cortisol (UFC), and plasma renin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay; and urinary albumin levels were determined by nephelometry. For statistical analysis, the Mann Whitney U test, Spearman correlation coefficient, and multivariate analysis of variance/multivariate analysis of covariance were used, as applicable.

RESULTS

The 24-hour values of UET1 and UFC were greater in male subjects with WCH than in male control subjects (P =.02), whereas no such difference was found in female subjects. The difference in UFC values in male subjects was accounted for by the day values. In subjects with WCH, and not in control subjects, a positive correlation of UET1 to UFC (r = 0.59, P =.027), diastolic BP (r = 0.55, P =.04), and mean BP (r = 0.65, P =.012) was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that WCH in adolescence may not be an innocent phenomenon and may represent a prelude to permanent idiopathic hypertension of adulthood.