Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch

Can early timed internal atrial defibrillation shocks reduce the atrial defibrillation threshold?

The defibrillation threshold is markedly reduced very early following the initiation of ventricular fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to determine if the same finding holds true for atrial defibrillation. Sustained, reproducible AF was induced with programmed atrial pacing using acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride (40-640 microL/min) in six adult sheep (heart weight 245-300 g). Seven timing intervals (125 ms, 200 ms, 1 s, 3 s, 10 s, 30 s, and 5 min after AF induction) and two lead configurations: (1) RA as cathode and CS as anode; and (2) RA as cathode and RV apex as anode were tested. Single capacitor biphasic waveforms (3/1 ms) were delivered and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) were determined in random order. No significant differences in leading edge voltage and total energy were detected for the RA-CS configuration for the seven timing intervals. For the RA-RV configuration, a significant difference was detected comparing the voltage for 125 ms to the 5-minute timing interval. For all times except 125 ms, the RA-RV threshold was significantly higher than the RA-CS level. In contrast to ventricular defibrillation, the ADFT does not change significantly within the first 5 minutes after the initiation of AF for the RA-CS configuration. However, if the shock is given very early (125 ms after AF induction) with the RA-RV configuration, the ADFT is lowered almost to the RA-CS level.

The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the influence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) durations of 5, 10 and 20 s on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Although the DFT using monophasic waveforms has been shown to increase with VF duration in humans, the effect of VF duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans is not known.

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing primary ICD implantation or pulse generator replacement were randomly assigned to have the DFT determined using biphasic shocks at two durations of VF each (5 and 10 s, 10 and 20 s or 5 and 20 s).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean DFT comparing VF durations of 5 s (9.5+/-6.0 J) and 10 s (10.8+/-7.0 J) (p=0.4). The mean DFT significantly increased from 10.9+/-6.1 J at 10 s of VF to 12.6+/-5.6 J (p=0.03) at 20 s of VF, and from 7.0+/-3.5 J at 5 s of VF to 10.5+/-6.3 J (p=0.04) at 20 s of VF. An increase in the DFT was observed in 14 patients as VF duration increased. There were no clinical characteristics that differentiated patients with and without an increase in the DFT.

CONCLUSIONS

Defibrillation efficacy decreases with increasing VF duration using biphasic waveforms in humans. Ventricular fibrillation durations greater than 10 s may negatively affect the effectiveness of ICD therapy.

The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and a preceding unsuccessful shock on the probability of defibrillation success using biphasic waveforms in pigs

INTRODUCTION

While the defibrillation threshold has been reported to increase with ventricular fibrillation (VF) duration for monophasic waveforms, the effect of VF duration for biphasic waveforms is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ED 50 requirements (the 50% probability of defibrillation success) for an endocardial lead system, which included a subcutaneous array, were determined by logistic regression using a recursive up-down algorithm for a biphasic waveform (6/6 msec). The study was performed in two parts, each with eight pigs. In part 1, ED 50 was compared for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF and for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF following a failed first shock at 10 seconds. Energy at ED 50 decreased from 6.5 +/- 0.9 J for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF to 4.9 +/- 0.8 J (P < 0.01) for shocks delivered after 20 seconds. To determine if improved second shock efficacy was a result of preconditioning by the failed first shock or a function of VF duration, part 2 of the study compared defibrillation efficacy between shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF with shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock at 10 seconds. Mean energy at ED 50 decreased from 10.1 +/- 2.4 J for shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF to 7.9 +/- 2.4 J (P < 0.01) and 7.5 +/- 3.2 J (P < 0.01) for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock, respectively. The mean energy at ED 50 for shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF with and without a failed first shock was not significantly different (P = 0.53). A strong linear correlation for energy at ED 50 was found between shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF and shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF following a failed first shock (r = 0.95, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

(1) As opposed to monophasic shocks, ED 50 is significantly lower for biphasic shocks delivered after 20 seconds of VF compared with shocks delivered after 10 seconds of VF in pigs. (2) An unsuccessful biphasic shock in pigs does not affect the defibrillation efficacy for a subsequent shock. (3) ED 50 for a biphasic shock delivered after 20 seconds of VF is linearly related to ED 50 for a shock delivered after 10 seconds of VF.

Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether considerably smaller capacitors could replace 125 microF capacitors as the standard for use in implantable defibrillators.

METHODS

Measured energy, impedance, voltage, and current delivered were compared at defibrillation threshold in 10 mongrel dogs for defibrillation using 75 microF and 125 microF capacitors alternated randomly. Defibrillation was attempted with biphasic shocks of comparable tilt between an endocardial lead in the right ventricular apex and a "dummy" active can of an experimental implantable device placed in the subpectoral position.

RESULTS

A reduction of capacitor size of 40% was associated with an increase in voltage of 21% and in current of 22%. With a 65% tilt, no significant differences were found between the two capacitances with respect to the impedance or energy required for defibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple advances in electrode material, electrode configuration, shock morphology, and shock polarity have reduced defibrillation energy requirements. Smaller capacitors could be used in implantable cardioverter/defibrillators without a major decrease in effectiveness.