Prediction of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of the atrioventricular node

Effect of Direct Slow Pathway Capture Mapping-Guided Ablation on Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Direct slow pathway capture (DSPC) mapping is a novel electrophysiological technique for detecting antegrade slow pathway input sites. However, the effect of DSPC mapping-guided ablation on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DSPC mapping-guided ablation in typical AVNRT patients.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 301 consecutive typical AVNRT patients. The outcomes in patients who underwent DSPC mapping-guided ablation (DSPC group) and those who underwent conventional anatomical ablation (conventional group) were compared. The conventional group was established before introducing DSPC mapping-guided ablation. Positive DSPC sites were defined as sites with a return cycle atrioventricular prolongation of ≥20 ms with high-output (10-20 V) pacing during tachycardia or the last paced beat of the atrial extrastimulation.

RESULTS

Among 116 patients in the DSPC group, 102 (88%) had positive DSPC sites, and 86 (74%) had a successful ablation at that site. Of the remaining 30 patients, 27 had a successful anatomical ablation. The DSPC group had a significantly lower frequency of radiofrequency applications and shorter total application time than the conventional group (median: 5.5 [IQR: 3-11] times vs 9 [IQR: 5-15] times, and 168 [IQR: 108-266] seconds vs 244 [IQR: 158-391] seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, the DSPC group had a numerically lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and AVNRT recurrences than the conventional group (0% vs 1.6%; P = 0.17, and 1.7% vs 3.2%; P = 0.43, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DSPC mapping-guided ablation was associated with a lower operative time, which can reduce the risk of AV conduction injury in typical AVNRT.

Wenckebach cycle length: A novel predictor for AV block in AVNRT patients treated with ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation remains the most effective management option for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The risk of atrioventricular (AV) block requiring permanent pacemaker is substantial, but, currently, a reliable method to predict this complication is lacking.

METHODS

The electrophysiologic studies (EPS) and baseline characteristics of patients who underwent catheter ablation for the treatment of AVNRT were retrospectively analyzed to investigate predisposing factors for AV block after treatment. Patients were followed for AV block at one month and one year after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Among 784 patients treated with catheter ablation for AVNRT between 1999 to 2019, 15 developed AV block. Patients with AV block were older (p = .001). Among the recorded EPS parameters, patients with AV block had significantly higher Atrial His interval (120 vs. 110 ms, p = .049), Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) (400 vs. 353 ms, p < .001) and tachycardia CL (400 vs. 387 ms, P = .01) during the ablation compared to their peers without AV block. Additionally, only WCL (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.02-1.19, p = .017) remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, ERP, AH interval, and HR. This association was confirmed by comparing patients with (n = 15) and without (n = 15) AV block using propensity score-matching. A WCL≥400ms was associated with a 4-fold higher incidence of AV block (4.79% vs. 1.25%).

CONCLUSION

Increased pre-procedural WCL was associated with a high risk for AV block after catheter ablation treatment for AVNRT. These findings suggest that this readily available EPS-derived parameter may be a novel marker of risk for severe complications in these patients.

Cryofreezing catheter ablation of adenosine triphosphate sensitive atrial tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) sensitive atrial tachycardia (AT) has been treated by radiofrequency catheter ablation. Cryofreezing energy has emerged as a novel energy source for catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cryofreezing ablation for ATP-sensitive AT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of six patients with ATP-sensitive ATs were included in this study. A single atrial extrastimulation was able to initiate and terminate these ATs in all six patients. The electrophysiological findings satisfied the diagnostic criteria of ATP-sensitive AT. The ablation catheter was located at the earliest activation site of atrial excitation during the AT, and cryofreezing energy was delivered through a cryoablation catheter to perform cryomapping at temperature of -30 or -80°C. When cryomapping successfully terminated the ATs, cryoablation at a temperature of -80°C was subsequently performed. The earliest atrial activation during AT was recorded at the Koch's triangle area associated with a distinct intra-atrial activation sequence from that recorded during ventricular pacing. Cryoablation was performed at successful cryomapping sites and resulted in the complete elimination of the AT in all six patients without affecting the bidirectional atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction.

CONCLUSION

Cryofreezing energy was safe and effective in treating ATP-sensitive ATs even in patients with its origins located in the vicinity of the AV node.

A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and disposable costs of different catheter ablation methods for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Background

Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a commonly performed electrophysiology (EP) procedure. Few data exist comparing conventional (CONV) versus novel ablation strategies from both clinical and direct cost perspectives. We sought to investigate the disposable costs and clinical outcomes associated with three different ablation methodologies used in the ablation of AVNRT.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of AVNRT ablations performed at Augusta University Medical Center from 2006 to 2014. A total of 183 patients were identified. Three different ablation techniques were compared: CONV manual radiofrequency (RF) (n=60), remote magnetic navigation (RMN)-guided RF (n=67), and cryoablation (CRYO) (n=56).

Results

Baseline demographics did not differ between the three groups except for a higher prevalence of cardiomyopathy in the RMN group (p<0.01). The clinical end point of interest was recurrent AVNRT following the index ablation procedure. A significantly higher number of recurrent AVNRT cases occurred in the CRYO group as compared to CONV and RMN (p=0.003; OR =7.75) groups. Cost-benefit analysis showed both CONV and RMN to be dominant compared to CRYO. Cost-minimization analysis demonstrated the least expensive ablation method to be CONV (mean disposable catheter cost = CONV US$2340; CRYO US$3515; RMN US$5190). Despite comparable clinical outcomes, the incremental cost of RMN over CONV averaged US$3094 per procedure.

Conclusion

AVNRT ablation using either CONV or RMN techniques is equally effective and associated with lower AVNRT recurrence rates than CRYO. CONV ablation carries significant disposable cost savings as compared to RMN, despite similar efficacy.

Protection of Critical Structures During Radiofrequency Ablation of Adjacent Myocardial Tissue Using Catheter Tips Partially Insulated With Thermally Conductive Material

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether partially insulated focused ablation (PIFA) catheters can minimize risk of injury to critical structures, such as the phrenic nerve and atrioventricular (AV) node, during ablation of adjacent myocardial tissue.

BACKGROUND

PIFA catheters using thermally conductive materials may have differential radiofrequency (RF) heating properties allowing for tailored RF application with more precision.

METHODS

Open-irrigated, 4- and 8-mm RF ablation catheter tips were insulated partially by coating one-half of their surfaces with a layer of vinyl, silicone, vinyl-silicone, polyurethane, or a composite of aluminum oxide/boron nitride (AOBN). These coated catheters or corresponding noninsulated catheters were positioned with 10 g of force on viable bovine myocardial tissue during RF application in an ex vivo setup. Tip temperatures, power, and lesion volumes were compared. The most effective coating, AOBN, was modified further by adding fenestrations to aid in passive cooling. PIFA catheters with fenestrated AOBN coating were then tested in an in vivo porcine model to target myocardial tissue adjacent to the AV node and the phrenic nerve.

RESULTS

PIFA catheters all demonstrated higher tip temperatures, although silicone- and AOBN-catheters demonstrated this to a lesser degree. Significant differences in lesion volumes and temperature-limited powers were noted between control, silicone, and AOBN tips. Steam pops were significantly higher for silicone but not AOBN. In contrast with non-PIFA catheters, injuries to the phrenic nerve and AV node during in vivo ablations with AOBN insulation positioned over these structures were reduced significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

RF ablation using catheter tips partially coated with a thermally conductive insulation material such as AOBN results in larger ablation lesion volumes without temperature limitations. Partial insulation of the catheter tip will protect adjacent critical structures during RF ablation.

Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in AVNRT: Same Goal, Different Strategy

Catheter ablation is nowadays the first therapeutic option for AVNRT, the most common benign supraventricular tachycardia. Both cryotherapy and radiofrequency energy may be used to ablate the slow pathway. This paper compares both techniques, evaluates results published in literature and gives feedback on some typical aspects of cryo- and RF ablation. Although both techniques have satisfying success rates in AVNRT ablation, with a higher safety profile of cryoablation towards creation of inadvertent atrioventricular block, it remains paramount that the operator respects the distinctive traits of each technique in order to obtain an optimal result in every patient.

Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly - changing of slow pathway location with aging

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of elderly patients with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and to assess the acute safety and efficacy of slow-pathway radiofrequency (RF) ablation in this specific group of patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study retrospectively included a total of 1,290 patients receiving successful slow-pathway RF ablation for typical slow-fast AVNRT. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I included 1,148 patients aged <65 years and group II included 142 patients aged >65 years. The required total procedure duration and total fluoroscopy exposure time were significantly higher in group II vs. group I (P=0.005 and P=0.0001, respectively). The number of RF pulses needed for a successful procedural end-point was significantly higher in group II than in group I (4.4 vs. 7.2, P=0.005). While the ratio of the anterior location near to the His-bundle region was significantly higher in group II, the ratio of posterior and midseptal locations were significantly higher in group I (P=0.0001). The overall procedure success rates were similar. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in respect of the complications rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience demonstrates that RF catheter ablation, targeting the slow pathway, could be considered as first-line therapy for typical AVNRT patients older than 65 years as well as younger patients, as it is very safe and effective in the acute period of treatment.

Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of the patients with relatively slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of typical AVNRT with relatively slow tachycardia rates below the average value compared to faster ones, in patients without structural heart disease.

METHODS

The present study retrospectively included a total of 1,150 patients receiving successful slow-pathway radio frequency ablation for typical slow-fast AVNRT. Patients were divided into two groups according to their tachycardia cycle length: group I included 1,018 patients with tachycardia cycle length < 400 msn and group II included 132 patients with cycle length > 400 msn. Patients with another form of arrhythmia other than typical AVNRT, the existence of structural heart disease, preexisting prolonged PR interval, history of clinically documented AF, and reasons capable of causing AF were accepted as exclusion criterias.

RESULTS

The patients in group II were older than those in group 1 (p=0.039), and male ratio was significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p=0.02). Wenckebach cycle length and AV node antegrade effective refractory period values before the RF ablation were significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p=0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Right atrium effective refractory period values in both pre- and post-ablation period were significantly higher in group I compared to group II (p=0.0001 and 0.004, respectively). The existence of atrial vulnerability before ablation was significantly higher in group II compared to group I (p=0.007); however, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of atrial vulnerability after the ablation. In addition, while the ratio of anterior location as an ablation site near the His-bundle region was significantly higher in group II, the ratio of posterior location was significantly higher in group I (p=0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates that clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of AVNRT patients with relatively slower tachycardia rates were quite different compared to the faster AVNRT cases.

How to avoid development of AV block during RF ablation: anatomical and electrophysiological analyses at the time of AV node ablation

BACKGROUND

With an aim to identify risk factors that can serve for prevention of atrioventricular (AV) block (AVB) during radiofrequency (RF) ablation, we conducted anatomical and electrophysiological investigations at the time of AV node ablation (AVNA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten patients who underwent AVNA were enrolled. RF energy was delivered from posterior region of septal annulus of the tricuspid valve to the His bundle potential (HBP) recording site using a stepwise approach. In each delivery, atrial/ventricle potential amplitude ratio (A/V ratio), HBP, and juctional ectopy (JE) that appeared during RF delivery were evaluated. Furthermore, fluoroscopic distance between ablation site and HBP recording site (anatomical H-ABL distance) and electrophysiological H-ABL interval were measured. HBP was recorded in 25 of total 70 RF deliveries. When HBP was recorded, the A/V ratio was significantly greater in the group with AVB than without AVB (1.6 ± 2.3 mV vs 0.1 ± 0.2 mV, P = 0.02). The minimum cycle length (CL) of JE was significantly shorter in the group with AVB than without AVB (438 ± 112 ms vs 557 ± 178, ms, P = 0.04). AVB developed frequently when H-ABL distance was less than 15 mm from right anterior oblique view 30° and 12 mm from left anterior oblique view 45° and when H-ABL interval was less than 10 ms. AVB did not develop over the above values.

CONCLUSIONS

HBP with high A/V ratio, JE with short CL, short H-ABL distance, and short H-ABL interval of less than 10 ms should be avoided to prevent AVB during RF ablation at the near site of AV node.

Rapid Atrial Pacing: A Useful Technique During Slow Pathway Ablation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a success rate of 95-98%. The appearance of junctional rhythm during radiofrequency (RF) application to the slow pathway has been consistently reported as a marker for the successful ablation of AVNRT. Ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction during junctional rhythm has been used by many as a surrogate marker of antegrade atrioventricular nodal (AVN) function. However, VA conduction may not be an accurate or consistent marker for antegrade AVN function and reliance on this marker may leave some patients at risk for antegrade AVN injury.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to describe a technique to ensure normal antegrade AVN function during junctional rhythm at the time of RF catheter ablation of the slow pathway.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients less than 21 years old who underwent RF ablation for AVNRT at our institution from January 2002 to July 2005. During RF applications, immediately after junctional rhythm was demonstrated, RAP was performed to ensure normal antegrade AVN function. Postablation testing was performed to assess AVN function and tachycardia inducibility.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients underwent RF ablation of AVNRT during the study period. The mean age +/- SD was 14 +/- 3 years (range: 5-20 years). The weight was 53 +/- 15 Kg (range: 19-89 Kg). The preablation Wenckebach cycle length was 397 +/- 99 msec (range: 260-700 msec). Fifty-four patients had inducible typical AVNRT, and four patients had atypical tachycardia. The mean tachycardia cycle length +/- SD was 323 +/- 62 msec (range: 200-500 msec). Patients underwent of 8 +/- 7 total RF applications (median: 7; range 1 to 34), for a total duration of 123 +/- 118 seconds (median: 78 sec, range: 20-473 sec). Junctional tachycardia was observed in 52 of 54 patients. RAP was initiated during junctional rhythm in all patients. No patient developed any degree of transient or permanent AVN block. Following ablation, the Wenckebach cycle length decreased to 364 +/- 65 msec (P < 0.01). Acutely successful RF catheter ablation was obtained in 56 of 58 patients (96%).

CONCLUSION

Rapid atrial pacing during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway is a safe alternative approach to ensure normal AVN function.

Transvenous radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and its pitfalls: A rationale for cryoablation?

Today, radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is accompanied by a high success, a low recurrence, and a low complication rate. Despite the fact that over the years this technique has been refined, several shortcomings still remain. In this overview, the most important pitfalls in the treatment of AVNRT with RF energy are discussed. Cryotherapy has the ability to overcome some of them. Both ice mapping and cryo-adherence are important characteristics of this energy source to study prospective ablation sites before a definitive and irreversible lesion is created. Theoretically, this could lead to less applications with less tissue damage and abolish the risk for permanent conduction disturbances. The early experience with this technique will be described. Until now, it still has to be proven that in a large cohort of patients, cryotherapy is at least as effective, and safer than RF.

Pace mapping of Koch's triangle reduces risk of atrioventricular block during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Slow pathway (SP) ablation of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be complicated by second- to third-degree AV block. We assessed the usefulness of pace mapping of Koch's triangle in preventing this complication.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nine hundred nine consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of AVNRT were analyzed. Group 1 (n=487) underwent conventional slow pathway ablation. Group 2 (n=422) underwent ablation guided by pace mapping of Koch's triangle, which located the anterogradely conducting fast pathway (AFP) based on the shortest St-H interval obtained by stimulating the anteroseptal, midseptal, and posteroseptal aspects of Koch's triangle. In group 2, AFP was anteroseptal in 384 (91%), midseptal in 33 (7.8%), and posteroseptal or absent in 5 (1.2%). In 32 of 33 patients with midseptal AFP, slow pathway ablation was performed strictly in the posteroseptal area. In 4 of 5 patients with posteroseptal or no AFP, retrograde fast pathway was ablated. Two patients refused ablation. Persistent second- to third-degree AV block was induced in 7 (1.4%) of 487 group 1 patients versus 0 (0%) of 422 group 2 patients (P=0.038). Ablation was successful in all patients in whom ablation was performed.

CONCLUSION

Pace mapping of Koch's triangle identifies patients in whom the AFP is absent or is abnormally close to the slow pathway. In these cases, guiding ablation helps to avoid AV block.

Electrophysiological Characteristics of Junctional Rhythm During Ablation of the Slow Pathway in Different Types of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined.

METHODS

Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Intracardiac echocardiography guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

ICE has demonstrated its utility in imaging right atrial structures but its utility in slow pathway (SP) ablation has not been documented in a randomized trial.

METHODS

The feasibility of using ICE as a imaging modality to identify the effective site of SP ablation was done in part one of the study comprising 10 patients of typical AVNRT. Subsequently, a prospective randomized study was done comparing the conventional (group A) and ICE guided (group B) ablation of the SP. Each group had 20 patients of typical AVNRT. Ablation in the conventional arm was guided by intracardiac electrograms and fluoroscopy. Group B patients underwent SP ablation guided primarily by ICE imaging; fluoroscopy was used mainly for initial placement of catheters.

RESULTS

Reliable & stable ICE images were obtained in all patients. Part I of the study showed that RF pulses given when the ablation catheter was seen to cross the atrioventricular muscular septum (AVMS), always resulted in junctional rhythm. In Group B, RF pulse was delivered only when the ablation catheter was at the AVMS making an obtuse angle with the image of the His-bundle catheter. Consistent junctional rhythm and abolition of SP resulted at this site. Compared to group A, patients in group B required fewer pulses (mean 1.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.4 +/- 3.0; p < 0.05, median 1 vs. 5; p < 0.01), achieved a higher temperature (56 +/- 4 degrees C vs. 50 +/- 6 degrees C) and had more frequent junctional rhythm (100% vs. 70%) during RF pulse.

CONCLUSIONS

A critical portion of SP exists adjacent to Tricuspid valve overlying the AVMS. ICE imaging consistently and reliably localizes this site and RF applications here result in interruption of antegrade SP conduction.

Distal end of the atrioventricular nodal artery predicts the risk of atrioventricular block during slow pathway catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

To search for a reliable anatomical landmark within Koch's triangle to predict the risk of atrioventricular (AV) block during radiofrequency slow pathway catheter ablation of AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To test the hypothesis that the distal end of the AV nodal artery represents the anatomical location of the AV node, and thus could be a useful landmark for predicting the risk of AV block, 128 consecutive patients with AVNRT receiving slow pathway catheter ablation were prospectively studied in two phases. In phase I (77 patients), angiographic demonstration of the AV nodal artery and its ending was performed at the end of the ablation procedure, whereas in the subsequent phase II study (51 patients), the angiography was performed immediately before catheter ablation to assess the value of identifying this new landmark in reducing the risk of AV block. Multiple electrophysiologic and anatomical parameters were analysed. The former included the atrial activation sequence between the His bundle recording site (HBE) and the coronary sinus orifice or the catheter ablation site, either during AVNRT or during sinus rhythm. The latter included the spatial distances between the distal end of the AV nodal artery and the HBE and the final catheter ablation site, and the distance between the HBE and the tricuspid border at the coronary sinus orifice floor.

RESULTS

In phase I, nine of the 77 patients had complications of transient (seven patients) or permanent (two patients) complete AV block during stepwise, anatomy guided slow pathway catheter ablation. These nine patients had a wider distance between the HBE and the distal end of the AV nodal artery, and a closer approximation of the catheter ablation site to the distal end of the AV nodal artery, which independently predicted the risk of AV block. In contrast, none of the available electrophysiologic parameters were shown to be reliable. When the distance between the distal end of the AV nodal artery and the ablation target site was more than 2 mm, the complication of AV block virtually never occurred. In phase II, all 51 patients had successful elimination of the slow pathways without complication when the ablation procedure was guided by preceding angiography with identification of the distal end of the AV nodal artery.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal end of the AV nodal artery shown by angiography serves as a useful landmark for the prediction of the risk of AV block during slow pathway catheter ablation of AVNRT.

Junctional rhythm during slow pathway radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: beat-to-beat analysis and its prognostic value in relation to electrophysiologic and anatomic parameters

INTRODUCTION

Junctional rhythm usually is considered a sensitive but nonspecific marker of successful ablation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Nevertheless, this junctional rhythm has been little studied, and its relations to recognized predictors of successful radiofrequency (RF) application were never established in any study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Ninety RF applications were delivered, and each ablation site was determined using three different fluoroscopic projections. Six anatomic zones were defined from low posterior septum to the site of distal His-bundle recording (P1, P2, M1, M2, A1, and A2). Characteristics of junctional rhythm during RF applications were analyzed. Atrial electrogram characteristics at the ablation sites also were studied. All patients had successful slow pathway ablation, without any complication. The ablation sites were located as follows: 41 at P1, 26 at P2, 20 at M1, and 3 in M2. Forty RF applications were successful: 14 of 41 attempts at P1, 7 of 26 at P2, 16 of 20 at M1, and 3 of 3 at M2. Mid-septal ablation site (M1 and M2) was associated with higher occurrence of junctional rhythm (P < 0.0001), earlier first junctional beat (P = 0.008), and earlier occurrence of the longest junctional burst (P = 0.03) compared with posterior ablation site (P1 and P2). The combination of a mid-septal ablation site and a first junctional beat occurring < or = 3 seconds after onset of RF application identified successful RF application with 100% accuracy. Using multivariate analysis, the ablation site, duration of atrial electrogram (including slow pathway potential when present), and occurrence of junctional rhythm were independent predictors of success.

CONCLUSION

Successful slow pathway ablation depends on many factors. Junctional rhythm characteristics are related to the site of RF delivery and can be helpful in assessing successful slow pathway ablation.

Atrial ectopy originating from the posteroinferior atrium during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Atrial ectopy sometimes appears during RF ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, its origin, characteristics, and significance are still unclear. To examine these issues, we analyzed 67 consecutive patients with AVNRT (60 with slow-fast AVNRT and 7 with fast-slow AVNRT), which was successfully eliminated by RF ablation to the sites with a slow potential in 63 patients and with the earliest activations of retrograde slow pathway conduction in 4 patients. During successful RF ablation, junctional ectopy with the activation sequence showing H-A-V at the His-bundle region appeared in 52 patients (group A) and atrial ectopy with negative P waves in the inferior leads preceding the QRS and the activation sequence showing A-H-V at the His-bundle region appeared in 15 patients (group B). Atrial ectopy was associated with (10 patients) or without junctional ectopy (5 patients). Before RF ablation, retrograde slow pathway conduction induced during ventricular burst and/or extrastimulus pacing was more frequently demonstrated in group B than in group A (9/15 [60%] vs 1/52 [2%], P < 0.001). Successful ablation site in group A was distributed between the His-bundle region and coronary sinus ostium, while that in group B was confined mostly to the site anterior to the coronary sinus ostium. In group B, atrial ectopy also appeared in 21% of the unsuccessful RF ablations. In conclusion, atrial ectopy is relatively common during slow pathway ablation and observed in 8% of RF applications overall and 22% of RF applications that successfully eliminated inducible AVNRT. Atrial ectopy appears to be closely related to successful slow pathway ablation among patients with manifest retrograde slow pathway function.

Electrophysiological characteristics during slow pathway ablation of posterior atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia

The purpose of this study was to compare the electrophysiological characteristics of posterior and anterior atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia (AVJRT) during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of a slow pathway. Twenty-four patients with common AVJRT, including 4 posterior (P) and 20 anterior AVJRT (A) were studied. We analyzed the retrograde atrial activation sequence of junctional rhythm and the presence of transient HA block during slow pathway ablation. When HA block developed, the AH interval before ablation and immediately after the end of energy delivery was measured. Successful ablation sites were divided into three groups; high (H), middle (M), and low (L) from the His bundle to the floor of the coronary sinus orifice. The results were: (1) the number of successful ablation sites were H 0, M 1, L 3 in P and H 1, M 8, L 11 in A; (2) the HA interval during AVJRT in P was longer than that in A (109 +/- 48 ms vs 43 +/- 6 ms, P < 0.01); (3) the retrograde atrial activation sequence during junctional rhythm was strictly concordant with that during AVJRT in both groups, but HA block developed during slow pathway ablation more often in P than in A (100% vs 30%, P < 0.01); and (4) The AH interval did not lengthen after HA block developed in P. These data suggest that another pathway does exist from the AV node to the atrium in addition to anterograde fast pathway and slow pathway, and that this pathway is used as the retrograde limb of P.

Age dependence of complete heart block complicating radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway

A significant age dependence of the risk of complete heart block complicating radiofrequency ablation of the AV nodal slow pathway was noticed, with no patients <45 years of age experiencing this complication.

Electrophysiologic characteristics of different ectopic rhythms during slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The presence of ectopic rhythm has been considered to be the most important marker for successful slow pathway ablation, but the details of different ectopic rhythms have not been well described. This study included 83 consecutive patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia who underwent slow pathway ablation. The interval between the atrial signals of the His bundle electrogram and the distal ablation catheter [A(H)-A(Ab)], and the interval between the atrial components of the distal ablation catheter and the ostium of coronary sinus catheter [A(Ab)-A(CSos)] were measured. One hundred episodes of ectopic rhythm occurred with 81 (81%) successful applications. There are two different origins and three activation sequences of ectopic rhythms, including HIS rhythm (78 applications, the earliest atrial activation in the His bundle electrogram), CSos rhythm (6 applications, the earliest atrial signal in the coronary sinus ostium electrogram) and CSos preceding HIS (CSos-->HIS) rhythm (16 applications, the atrial activation sequences changing from CSos to HIS rhythm). The CSos rhythm had a shorter mean cycle length (445 +/- 81 vs. 511 +/- 132 vs. 579 +/- 140 ms, p < 0.05), a shorter [A(Ab)-A(CSos)] interval (-2.5 +/- 9.8 vs. 14.1 +/- 11.2 vs. 12.8 +/- 8.4 ms, p < 0.05) and a lower success rate (33% vs. 84% vs. 94% p < 0.05) than HIS rhythm and CSos-->HIS rhythm. Otherwise, the mean cycle length of ectopic rhythm was significant shorter in successful than in failed ablation (506 +/- 135 vs. 559 +/- 118 ms, p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found two different origins and three activation sequences of ectopic rhythms. CSos rhythm had a lower success rate in ablation of slow pathway, thus it was a poor marker for successful ablation.

Catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The current status of catheter ablation techniques for the management of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia is outlined in this article. Some pertinent aspects of the atrioventricular nodal anatomy and physiology are discussed, to the extent that they are essential for understanding of the mechanism of this arrhythmia and the technique of catheter ablation.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the anterosuperior and posteroinferior atrial approaches to the AV node for treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: techniques for selective ablation of "fast" and "slow" AV node pathways

Radiofrequency catheter ablation has been established as a first-line curative treatment modality in patients with symptomatic AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The successful sites of stepwise catheter ablation approaches of the so-called fast and slow pathways strongly suggest that AVNRT involves the atrial approaches to the AV node. The typical fast pathway ablation sites are located anterosuperior toward the apex of the triangle of Koch, which also contains the compact AV node, whereas the usual slow pathway ablation sites are located posteroinferior toward the base of the triangle of Koch at a greater distance to the compact AV node and bundle of His. Accordingly, ablation studies with large patient cohorts have demonstrated that fast pathway ablation carries a higher risk of inadvertent complete AV block. Thus, the slow pathway is clearly the primary target site, and fast pathway ablation is rarely necessary. Different approaches for slow pathway ablation have been elaborated: anatomically oriented stepwise techniques, ablation guided by double potentials recorded within the area of the slow pathway insertion, and combined techniques. The modern concept of AVNRT suggests that this arrhythmia involves the highly complex three-dimensional nonuniform anisotropic AV junctional area. Accordingly, mapping and ablation studies demonstrated that the anterior approach is not identical with fast pathway ablation, and the posterior approach is not identical with slow pathway ablation. Therefore, it is essential for interventional electrophysiologists to familiarize themselves with the anatomic and electrophysiologic details of this complex and variable specialized AV junctional region. In this review, the anatomic and pathophysiologic aspects of the AV junctional area as they relate to interventional therapy are summarized briefly, and the catheter techniques for ablation of the so-called fast and slow AV nodal pathways for the treatment of AVNRT are described.

Catheter-induced atrioventricular nodal block during radiofrequency ablation

This study examined the incidence and significance of catheter-induced atrioventricular nodal block (AVNB) during a radiofrequency ablation procedure that uses stiff large-tip steerable ablation catheters. AVNB was noted in 10 (1.6%) of 613 consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation therapy for atrioventricular nodal (AVN) reentrant tachycardia (592 patients) or atrioventricular reentry tachycardia incorporating a midseptal accessory pathway (21 patients). Of these 10 patients, 9 underwent AVN modification for AVN reentrant tachycardia and 1 for ablation of a midseptal accessory pathway. One patient had two episodes of AVNB during two sessions undertaken because of recurrence of tachycardia. No patient had a preexisting conduction defect before the study. In all 10 patients, AVNB was transient, and it lasted for a mean of 9.1 +/- 19 minutes. It occurred during positioning of the ablation catheter in the junctional area before (8 patients) or after (2 patients) the start of radiofrequency current applications. Complete AVNB was noted on six occasions, second-degree AVNB on four occasions, and first-degree AVNB on one occasion. All blocks were associated with narrow QRS ventricular beats and with a site of block proximal to the His bundle. The mean ventricular heart rate during AVNB was 60 +/- 23 beats/min. Two patients had transient asystole, with one having loss of consciousness. No patient required special treatment for heart block. One-to-one conduction resumed after repositioning of the catheters, and the subsequent ablation procedure was successfully completed in 8 of the 10 patients. During a follow-up of 20 +/- 12 months, none of the patients had severe dizziness or syncope, and none required implantation of a permanent pacemaker. In conclusion, transient AVNB due to mechanical injury occurs during positioning of a stiff large-tip steerable ablation catheter in the junctional area. Delivery of radiofrequency current to the site that provokes catheter-induced AVNB should be avoided.