Predictors of arrhythmic death and cardiac arrest in the ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electromagnetic Monitoring

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during outpatient anesthesia: a case report

During the perioperative period, anesthesiologists frequently observe cardiac tachyarrhythmia. Ventricular tachycardia is very rare in non-cardiac surgeries. However, it can be fatal when it occurs. Therefore, anesthesiologists should be watchful so as to not to miss ventricular tachycardia and take the appropriate steps to manage it promptly. We present a case, with a review of related literature, in which a non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was observed in a patient who visited the hospital for dental treatment.

Sudden death and its predictors in myocardial infarction survivors in an Indian population

Objective

This study was conducted to assess the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in post myocardial infarction patients and to determine the predictive value of various risk markers in identifying cardiac mortality and SCD.

Methods

Left ventricular function, arrhythmias on Holter and microvolt T wave alternans (MTWA) were assessed in patients with prior myocardial infarction and ejection fraction ≤ 40%. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death and resuscitated cardiac arrest during follow up. Secondary outcomes included total mortality and SCD.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Eight patients (15.5%) died during a mean follow-up of 22.3 ± 6.6 months. Seven of them (12.1%) had SCD. Among the various risk markers studied, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 30% (Hazard ratio 5.6, 95% CI 1.39 to 23) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in holter (5.7, 95% CI 1.14 to 29) were significantly associated with the primary outcome in multivariate analysis. Other measures, including QRS width, heart rate variability, heart rate turbulence and MTWA showed no association.

Conclusions

Among patients with prior myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular function, the rate of cardiac death was substantial, with most of these being sudden cardiac death. Both LVEF ≤30% and NSVT were associated with cardiac death whereas only LVEF predicted SCD. Other parameters did not appear useful for prediction of events in these patients. These findings have implications for decision making for the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in these patients.

Clinical significance of precedent asymptomatic non-sustained ventricular tachycardias on subsequent ICD interventions and heart failure hospitalization in primary prevention ICD patients

Background

The prognostic implications of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) and their significance as therapeutic targets in patients without prior sustained ventricular arrhythmias remain undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of asymptomatic NSVT in patients who had primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation due to ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, NICM).

Methods

We enrolled 157 consecutive primary prevention ICD patients without previous appropriate ICD therapy (AIT). Patients were allocated to two groups depending on the presence or absence of NSVT in a 6-month period prior to enrollment. The incidence of AIT and unplanned hospitalization due to decompensated heart failure (HF) were assessed during follow-up.

Results

In 51 patients (32%), precedent NSVT was documented. During a median follow-up of 1011 days, AIT occurred in 36 patients (23%) and unplanned HF hospitalization was observed in 32 patients (20%). In precedent NSVT patients, the incidence of AIT and unplanned HF hospitalization was significantly higher as compared to patients without precedent NSVT (AIT: 29/51 [57%] vs. 7/106 [7%], P < 0.001, log-rank; HF hospitalization: 16/51 [31%] vs. 16/106 [15%], P = 0.043, log-rank). Cox-regression demonstrated that precedent NSVT independently predicted AIT (P < 0.0001). In subgroup analyses, precedent NSVT predicted AIT in both ICM and NICM (P < 0.0001, P = 0.020), but predicted HF hospitalization only in patients with ICM (P = 0.0030).

Conclusions

Precedent non-sustained VT in patients with primary prevention ICDs is associated with subsequent appropriate ICD therapies, and is an independent predictor of unplanned heart failure hospitalizations in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

When to consider an implantable cardioverter defibrillator following myocardial infarction?

After reading this article the reader should be familiar with: Current guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) use post myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Primary prevention ICD guidelines. Secondary prevention ICD guidelines. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients post MI and the use of ICDs. Programming ICDs.

Device therapy for acute systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation

Patients with newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy require careful assessment of cause and initiation of treatment before the decision is made to implant an internal cardiac defibrillator. In patients with medicine-refractory atrial fibrillation and cardiomyopathy, atrioventricular node ablation and implantation of a biventricular pacemaker is the therapy of choice when tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy is suspected and curative therapy is not possible.

A Questionable Indication For ICD Extraction After Successful VT Ablation

Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias represent a kind of complication shared by a number of clinical presentations of heart disease, sometimes leading to sudden cardiac death. Many efforts have been made in the fight against such a complication, mainly being represented by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In recent years, catheter ablation has grown as a means to effectively treat patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, in the contest of different cardiac substrates. Since carrying an ICD is associated with a potential risk deriving from its possible infective or malfunctioning complications, and given the current effectiveness of lead extraction procedures, it has been thought not to be unreasonable to ask ourselves about how to deal with ICD patients who have been successfully treated by means of ablation of their ventricular arrhythmias. To date, no control data have been published on transvenous lead extraction in the setting of VT ablation. In this paper we will review the current evidence about ICD therapy, catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias and lead extraction, trying to outline some considerations about how to face this new clinical issue.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) has been recorded in a wide range of conditions, from apparently healthy individuals to patients with significant heart disease. In the absence of heart disease, the prognostic significance of NSVT is debatable. When detected during exercise, and especially at recovery, NSVT indicates increased cardiovascular mortality within the next decades. In trained athletes, NSVT is considered benign when suppressed by exercise. In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, NSVT occurring beyond 48 h after admission indicates an increased risk of cardiac and sudden death, especially when associated with myocardial ischemia. In acute myocardial infarction, in-hospital NSVT has an adverse prognostic significance when detected beyond the first 13 to 24 h. In patients with prior myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion and beta-blockers, NSVT is not an independent predictor of long-term mortality when other covariates such as left ventricular ejection fraction are taken into account. In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and most probably genetic channelopathies, NSVT carries prognostic significance, whereas its independent prognostic ability in ischemic heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy has not been established. The management of patients with NSVT is aimed at treating the underlying heart disease.

Risk factors of self-terminating and perpetuating ventricular tachyarrhythmias in post-infarction patients with moderately depressed left ventricular function, a CARISMA sub-analysis

AIMS

The present study aimed to assess whether there are differences in risk indicators for perpetuating ventricular tachyarrhythmias (pVT) and self-terminating ventricular tachyarrhythmias (stVT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% (n = 292) received an implantable electrocardiogram loop recorder from 5 to 21 days after AMI and were followed up for 24 months to document arrhythmic events in the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) study. Several risk markers, such as the inducibility to sustained ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation (PES), the signal-averaged ECG QRS duration (SAECG-QRS), heart rate variability (HRV) and turbulence (HRT), T-wave alternans, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter were analysed at 6 weeks after the AMI. During the follow-up, 26 patients (9%) experienced an stVT (≥ 16 beats and < 30 s), and 21 patients (7%) a pVT. The occurrence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter significantly predicted stVT [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.90, 1.26-6.67, 95% confidence interval (CI), P = 0.01], but not pVT during the follow-up. The inducibility during PES (HR = 5.02, 1.85-13.60, 95% CI, P = 0.001), SAECG-QRS ≥ 130 ms (HR = 8.73, 3.38-22.56, 95% CI, P < 0.001), the short-term scaling exponent HRV parameter ≤ 0.77 (HR = 5.65, 2.12-15.10, 95% CI, P = 0.001), and HRT slope ≤ 1.75 ms/NN (HR = 4.57, 1.80-11.59, 95% CI, P = 0.001) were significant predictors of pVT, even after adjustments with relevant clinical parameters (P from < 0.01 to < 0.001), but did not significantly predict the occurrence of stVT (P from 0.35 to 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Self-terminating ventricular tachyarrhythmia and pVT have differences in electrophysiological substrate and arrhythmia modifiers in post-AMI patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction.

Short-term effects of ketamine and isoflurane on left ventricular ejection fraction in an experimental Swine model

Background. General anesthesia is an essential element of experimental medical procedures. Ketamine and isoflurane are agents commonly used to induce and maintain anesthesia in animals. The cardiovascular effects of these anesthetic agents are diverse, and the response of global myocardial function is unknown. Methods. In a series of 15 swine, echocardiography measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained before the animals received anesthesia (baseline), after an intramuscular injection of ketamine (postketamine) and after inhaled isoflurane (postisoflurane). Results. The mean LVEF of an unanesthetized swine was 47 ± 3%. There was a significant decrease in the mean LVEF after administration of ketamine to 41 + 6.5% (P = 0.003). The addition of inhaled isoflurane did not result in further decrease in mean LVEF (mean LVEF 38 ± 7.2%, P = 0.22). Eight of the swine had an increase in their LVEF with sympathetic stimulation. Conclusions. In our experimental model the administration of ketamine was associated with decreased LV function. The decrease may be largely secondary to a blunting of sympathetic tone. The addition of isoflurane to ketamine did not significantly change LV function. A significant number of animals had returned to preanesthesia LV function with sympathetic stimulation.

[Limits and scopes of invasive risk stratification. Do we still need programmed ventricular stimulation?]

Patients with ischemic heart disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ICM), dilated (DCM), hypertrophic (HCM), or arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVCM) carry a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are most often the cause of SCD, which can be treated with internal cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, a great proportion of these high-risk patients will never experience potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias, and as such will never be in need of these devices. Given the risks, inconvenience, and costs of ICDs, markers that adequately stratify patients according to their risk of SCD are needed. Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has long been used to identify the patients' risk of SCD. However, the prognostic ability of PVS is only modest and the negative predictive value is poor. As far as patients with ICM are concerned, recent data from the MUSTT and MADIT II trials demonstrate that in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction between 30% and 40%, inducibility by PVS can help to identify patients who are at particularly increased risk of SCD. The value of PVS in patients with DCM, HCM, and ARVCM for risk stratification of SCD is less clear and the available data even more limited. In these patients, the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias does not clearly correlate with VT/VF (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) risk, and more importantly, noninducibility does not portend good prognosis. The current German guidelines appreciate these uncertainties of PVS for risk stratification with class IIb recommendations in certain patients with ICM, HCM or ARVCM. In the future, combining the results of invasive PVS with other noninvasive parameters may improve its prognostic value. Furthermore, expanding the role of PVS to guiding therapeutic ablation of ventricular arrhythmias may influence patient's future risk of SCD.

Sustained Polymorphic Arrhythmias Induced by Programmed Ventricular Stimulation have Prognostic Value in Patients Receiving Defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) who have monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) induced by programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Among a primary prevention population, the prognostic significance of induced polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 105 consecutive patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention of SCD in the setting of ICM and non-sustained VT were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy-five patients (group I) had induction of monomorphic VT and 30 patients (group II) had a sustained ventricular arrhythmia other than monomorphic VT (ventricular flutter, ventricular fibrillation, and polymorphic VT) induced during PVS.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between group I and group II except for ejection fraction (25% vs. 31%, P = 0.0001) and QRS duration (123 milliseconds vs. 109 milliseconds, P = 0.04). Sixteen of 75 (21.3%) patients in group I and 6 of 30 (20%) patients in group II received appropriate ICD therapy (P = 0.88). Survival free from ICD therapy was similar between groups (P = 0.54). There was a trend toward increased all-cause mortality among patients in group I by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.08). However, when adjusted for age, EF, and QRS duration mortality was similar (P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in rates of appropriate ICD discharge or mortality between patients dichotomized by type of rhythm induced during PVS. These results suggest that patients in this population who have inducible VF or sustained polymorphic VT have similar rates of subsequent clinical ventricular tachyarrhythmias as those with inducible monomorphic VT.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation may predict sudden cardiac death in heart failure patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the ability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)-derived variables as sudden cardiac death (SCD) predictors.

BACKGROUND

The CPET variables, such as peak oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilatory requirement to carbon dioxide (CO2) production (VE/VCO2) slope, and exercise oscillatory breathing (EOB), are strong predictors of overall mortality in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Even though up to 50% of CHF patients die from SCD, it is unknown whether any of these variables predicts SCD.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six CHF patients (mean age: 60.9 +/- 9.4 years; mean ejection fraction: 34.9 +/- 10.6%) underwent CPET. Subjects were tracked for sudden versus pump-failure cardiac mortality over 27.8 +/- 25.2 months.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients died from SCD, and 17 died from cardiac pump failure. Survivors showed significantly higher peak VO2 (16.8 +/- 4.5 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and lower VE/VCO2 slope (32.8 +/- 6.4) and prevalence of EOB (20.3%), compared with subjects who experienced arrhythmic (13.5 +/- 3.2 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1); 41.5 +/- 11.4; 100%) or nonarrhythmic (14.1 +/- 4.7 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1); 38.1 +/- 7.3; 47.1%) deaths (p < 0.05). At Cox regression analysis, all variables were significant univariate predictors of both sudden and pump failure death (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis, including left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV end systolic volume, and LV mass selected EOB, was the strongest predictor of both overall mortality (chi-square: 38.7, p < 0.001) and SCD (chi-square: 44.7, p < 0.001), whereas VE/VCO2 slope was the strongest ventilatory predictor of pump failure death (chi-square: 11.8, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise oscillatory breathing is an independent predictor of SCD in patients with CHF and might help as an additional marker for prioritization of antiarrhythmic strategies.

Sudden cardiac death: the role of risk stratification

Sudden cardiac death syndrome remains a major health problem responsible for approximately 400,000 deaths annually in the US. Effective therapies exist but are costly and are associated with potential complications. Currently used strategies for selection of the best candidates for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy are imperfect and leave a large number of high-risk patients unprotected. At the same time, many patients who received ICDs will never develop tachyarrhythmia and require ICD intervention. The article summarizes the current status and applicability of the noninvasive and invasive tests used for sudden cardiac death risk assessment with the emphasis on the increasingly recognized value of microvolt T wave alternans.

Prediction of sudden death in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure by using cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of cardiac iodine-123 (123I) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging as a predictor of sudden death in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

97 outpatients with CHF with a radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (mean (SD) 29% (7.5%)).

INTERVENTIONS

At study entry, cardiac I-123 MIBG imaging was performed. The cardiac MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) and washout rate (WR) were obtained from MIBG imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were assigned to two groups based upon 27% of WR, which was the mean (2SD) control WR. 48 of 97 patients with CHF had abnormal WR (> or =27%), whereas the remaining 49 patients had normal WR (<27%). All the study patients were then followed up.

RESULTS

During the mean (SD) follow-up period of 65 (29) months, 12 (25%) patients in the abnormal WR group and 2 (4%) patients in the normal WR group died suddenly. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that sudden death was more often observed in patients with abnormal WR than those with normal WR (p = 0.001). On Cox regression analysis, MIBG WR, H/M on the delayed image and H/M on the early image were significantly associated with sudden death.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac MIBG imaging would be useful for predicting sudden death in patients with CHF.

[Risk stratification in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias]

Atrial fibrillation, the most frequent arrhythmia, has a growing incidence with increasing age and the most important complication of the disease is thromboembolic events that may be prevented by antivitamin K. They are the most efficient therapeutic class for the prevention of these events but they are associated with an increased haemorrhagic risk leading to a reduced prescription in general practice. Optimisation of the management should be based on an individual evaluation of the thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risks, taking into account age, the presence of an associated heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, history of cerebrovascular event, history of previous haemorrhagic event and the ability to achieve a stable target INR. The challenge in ventricular arrhythmias lies in identifying a high risk of sudden death, mainly related to ventricular fibrillation. In patients with structural heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction is the strongest predictor of sudden death. Non invasive markers such as non sustained ventricular tachycardia, late ventricular potentials, decreased heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity, and repolarization altemans are further elements to assess risk. However, most of these markers have a poor positive predictive value and a low specificity. In patients with normal hearts, genetic predisposition may in the future identify high risk patients. The electrophysiologic study with programmed ventricular stimulation remains a costly and invasive method and only has a strong positive predictive value in ischemic cardiomyopathy. More precise algorithms for risk stratification are thus needed that may help the strategy of therapy with prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the future.

Factors Influencing Appropriate Firing of the Implanted Defibrillator for Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the role of clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and electrophysiological variables as predictors of appropriate initial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) or death in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II) population.

BACKGROUND

There is limited information regarding the determinants of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with reduced ventricular function after a myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We used secondary analysis in one arm of a multicenter randomized clinical trial in patients with a previous myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular function.

RESULTS

We analyzed baseline and follow-up data on 719 patients enrolled in the ICD arm of the MADIT-II study. Appropriate ICD therapy was observed in 169 subjects. Clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and electrophysiological variables, along with measures of clinical instability such as interim hospitalization for congestive heart failure (IH-CHF) and interim hospitalization for coronary events (IH-CE), were examined with proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier time-to-event curves before and after first interim hospitalization. Interim hospitalization-CHF, IH-CE, no beta-blockers, digitalis use, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) >25, body mass index (BMI) > or =30 kg/m2, and New York Heart Association functional class >II were associated with increased risk for appropriate ICD therapy for VT, VF, or death. In a multivariate (stepwise selection) analysis, IH-CHF was associated with an increased risk for the end point of either VT or VF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69 to 3.74, p < 0.001) and for the combined end point of VT, VF, or death (HR 2.97, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.09, p < 0.001). Interim hospitalization-CE was associated with an increased risk for VT, VF, or death (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.52, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide important mechanistic information, suggesting that worsening clinical condition and cardiac instability, as reflected by an IH-CHF or IH-CE, are subsequently associated with a significant increase in the risk for appropriate ICD therapy (for VT/VF) and death.

Can Amiodarone Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Hemodynamically Tolerated Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia and Coronary Artery Disease?

One of the most important challenges in today's cardiology is prevention of sudden cardiac death in high risk patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Sustained hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (HTVT) comprises up to 30% of all cases of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with CAD. While there is a consensus on treatment of hemodynamically unstable sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with CAD, some controversies regarding the proper treatment of HTVT exist. We re-examined existing clinical evidence, controversies and current guidelines on the treatment of HTVT in patients with CAD and demonstrated that compared to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, amiodarone is not an acceptable therapeutic option in patients with ischemic heart disease who suffer from HTVT.

Risk Stratification and Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

The initial challenge in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) lies in identifying those at greatest risk, before the index event. Ventricular fibrillation is the leading cause of SCD; however, many clinical conditions predispose fatal ventricular dysrhythmias. In patients with structural heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction is the strongest predictor of SCD. Noninvasive markers such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, delayed potentials, decreased heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity, and repolarization alternans are further observed to assess risk in ischemic cardiomyopathy; however, most of these markers have poor positive predictive value and lack specificity. The electrophysiologic study has strong positive predictive value, but remains a costly and invasive method for risk stratification. In patients with normal hearts, genetic predisposition may identify patients at risk but clinical markers are not readily recognized. The implantable loop recorder is a useful tool in detecting dysrhythmic causes of syncope and identifying patients at risk for SCD.

Are drugs and catheter ablation effective for treating ventricular arrhythmias in populations that cannot afford implantable cardioverter defibrillators?

Despite recent advances, ventricular arrhythmias continue to pose a therapeutic challenge, especially to the clinician in the developing world. Although the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has improved survival in both primary and secondary prevention trials, it still remains a costly modality for the developing world. Even though certain subgroups stand to benefit unequivocally in survival from the ICD, there are others in whom this therapy may not offer a survival benefit over empiric antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone. The utility of optimized drug therapy (including either amiodarone or sotalol, b-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) needs to be compared with the ICD in a randomized manner in these lower-risk patients with ventricular arrhythmias. The role of conventional catheter ablation techniques is mostly adjunctive to drugs and ICDs, although the newer mapping and ablation techniques may offer greater promise in the future.

Etiology and management of sustained ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to a variety of underlying cardiovascular problems pose a therapeutic challenge to the clinician. The initial presentation may be as sudden cardiac death, which underlies its public health problem. The underlying conditions predisposing to this arrhythmia include ischemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmiogenic right ventricle dysplasia and certain postoperative states including corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot and valve replacement. Other causes include prolonged QT syndrome, idiopathic right and left ventricle tachycardia and bundle branch re-entry tachycardia. Ischaemic heart disease is the most common cause of ventricular tachycardia and therapy has evolved considerably over the past two decades. The development of and refinements in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have introduced a new dimension in therapeutic options and markedly improved survival in these patients. Insights in the dichotomy between arrhythmia suppression and total mortality have reoriented drug therapy with a decrease in the use of sodium channel blockers. beta-blockers have emerged as antiarrhythmic drugs in their own right and their synergistic effects with amiodarone have strengthened the antiarrhythmic drug arm. The role of these drugs in patients with hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia, especially in relatively preserved ventricles needs to be explored. Catheter ablation techniques have provided curative therapy in patients with idiopathic and bundle branch reentry tachycardia. Further advances in radiofrequency ablation, including use of newer mapping techniques, promise a greater role for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia in the future. A hybrid approach consisting of drugs, catheter ablation and/ or ICD may provide effective therapeutic approach in some situations. Further innovations and technologic developments promise a further reorientation in therapy towards identification and treatment of the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate.

Therapeutic decision tree for patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias or aborted cardiac arrest: a critical review of the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator trial and the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study

Antiarrhythmic drugs, mainly amiodarone and sotalol, radiofrequency catheter ablation, and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are the 3 therapeutic options in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Idiopathic VT, incessant VT, frequently recurring, hemodynamically stable VT, and VT based on bundle branch reentry, are candidates for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Patients with high-risk ventricular tachyarrhythmias should receive ICDs as initial therapy. Two studies, the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator trial (AVID) and the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS) have tried to approach the problem of these high-risk ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Although at 3 years, the ICD in AVID demonstrated a significant relative risk reduction over amiodarone of 31.5%, CIDS could not duplicate this finding. At 3 years, the relative risk reduction conferred by the ICD over amiodarone in CIDS was only 13.7%. A careful analysis of both studies suggests that CIDS was insufficiently powered to demonstrate statistically significant benefits similar to those shown by AVID, and furthermore, seemed to include an undetermined number of low-risk VT patients. The problem in the CIDS trial in this regard was the recruitment of patients in whom the inclusion criteria were met by the arrhythmias induced during the electrophysiology stimulation study, but which did not exist in real life. In addition CIDS included 14% of patients with (1) undocumented syncope and inducible monomorphic sustained VT; or (2) long runs of spontaneous nonsustained VT. Under these circumstances, the therapeutic implications of AVID remain unchallenged.

Determinants of outcome in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) study registry

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias varies according to clinical characteristics. We sought to identify predictors of survival in a large population of patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias not related to reversible or correctable causes included in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed the impact of 36 demographic, clinical, and discharge treatment variables on the outcome for 3559 patients. Survival status was assessed with the use of the National Death Index. Multivariate analyses were performed with the use of the Cox proportional hazards model. After a mean follow-up of 17 +/- 12 months, 631 patients died. Actuarial survival was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 0.88), 0.79 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81), and 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.74) at 1, 2, and 3 years. Multivariate predictors of worse survival included older age, severe left ventricular dysfunction, lower systolic blood pressure, history of congestive heart failure, diabetes, smoking or atrial fibrillation, and preexistent pacemaker. The hemodynamic impact of the qualifying arrhythmia was not a predictor of outcome. Defibrillator implantation and hospital discharge while the patient was taking a beta-blocker or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor were associated with better prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite therapeutic advances, the mortality rates of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias remain high. Prognosis depends on the severity of underlying heart disease, as reflected by the extent of left ventricular dysfunction and the presence of heart failure. Well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease does not carry a significantly better prognosis than ventricular tachyarrhythmia with more severe hemodynamic consequences.

Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era

Historically, risk stratification for survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has centered on 3 principles: assessment of left ventricular function, detection of residual myocardial ischemia, and estimation of the risk for sudden cardiac death. Although these factors still have important prognostic implications for these patients, our ability to predict adverse cardiac events has significantly improved over the last several years. Recent studies have identified powerful predictors of adverse cardiac events available from the patient history, physical examination, initial electrocardiogram, and blood testing early in the evaluation of patients with AMI. Numerous studies performed in patients receiving early reperfusion therapy with either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty have emphasized the importance of a patent infarct related artery for long-term survival. The predictive value of a variety of noninvasive and invasive tests to predict myocardial electrical instability have been under active investigation in patients receiving early reperfusion therapy. The current understanding of the clinically important predictors of clinical outcomes in survivors of AMI is reviewed in this article.

Sudden death in recipients of transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems: terminal events, predictors, and potential mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) systems are very effective in preventing sudden death; however, little is known about terminal events and potential causes and mechanisms of sudden death in recipients of these devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 74 cases of sudden death among patients enrolled in several clinical investigations of transvenous ICD systems. Eighty-one percent were men (mean age 68+/-10 years), 86% had coronary artery disease, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.27+/-0.11, and two thirds presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia. The final event was witnessed in 65 patients (81%). Based on reported ICD shocks, documented rhythm, and/or postmortem device data, sudden death was deemed tachyarrhythmic in 49 cases (66%), nontachyarrhythmic in 12 (16%), and indeterminate in the remaining 13 (18%). Multivariate analysis of several clinical and nonclinical factors found advanced age (> 65 years, P = 0.03, odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 2.92), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< 0.35, P < 0.01, OR 3.51, CI 1.66 to 7.40), and having antibradycardia pacing ICDs (P = 0.02, OR 5.26, CI 1.37 to 20.0) to be independent predictors of sudden death. One or more predisposing factors and/or potential causes of sudden death were identified in 21 patients (28%).

CONCLUSION

In this select group of transvenous ICD recipients, (1) sudden death was associated with ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in at least two thirds of cases, (2) nearly one third of patients had one or more factors, some device related, that could have been associated with sudden death, and (3) death ensued despite appropriate ICD therapies and, in many cases, external resuscitation, suggesting acute adverse events as common terminal factors.

Shocks as predictors of survival in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to determine whether the occurrence of shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias during therapy with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is predictive of shortened survival.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias eliciting shocks are often associated with depressed ventricular function, making assessment of shocks as an independent risk factor difficult.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 421) with a mean follow-up of 756+/-523 days were classified into those who had received no shock (n = 262) or either one of two shock types, defined as single (n = 111) or multiple shocks (n = 48) per arrhythmia episode. Endpoints were all-cause and cardiac deaths. A survival analysis using a stepwise proportional hazards model evaluated the influence of two primary variables, shock type and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <35% or >35%). Covariates analyzed were age, gender, NYHA Class, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, defibrillation threshold and tachyarrhythmia inducibility.

RESULTS

The most complete model retained LVEF (p = 0.005) and age (p = 0.023) for the comparison of any shock versus no shock (p = 0.031). The occurrence of any versus no shock, or of multiple versus single shocks significantly decreased survival at four years, and these differences persisted after adjustment for LVEF. In the LVEF subgroups <35% and <25%, occurrence of multiple versus no shock more than doubled the risk of death. Compared with the most favorable group LVEF > or =35% and no shock, risk in the group multiple shocks and LVEF <35% was increased 16-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

In defibrillator recipients, shocks act as potent predictors of survival independent of several other risk factors, particularly ejection fraction.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Implantable defibrillators have become the dominant therapeutic modality for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Current defibrillators are small (<60 mL) and implanted with techniques similar to standard pacemakers. They provide high-energy shocks for ventricular fibrillation and rapid ventricular tachycardia, antitachycardia pacing for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, as well as antibradycardia pacing. Newer devices incorporating an atrial lead allow dual-chamber pacing and better discrimination between ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Randomized controlled trials have shown superior survival with implantable defibrillators than with antiarrhythmic drugs in survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. Complications associated with implantable defibrillator therapy include infection, lead failure, and spurious shocks for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Most patients adapt well to living with an implantable defibrillator, although driving often has to be restricted. Limited evidence suggests that implantable defibrillator therapy is cost-effective when compared with other widely accepted treatments. The use of implantable defibrillators is likely to continue to expand in the future. Ongoing clinical trials will define further prophylactic indications of the implantable defibrillator and clarify its cost-effectiveness ratio in different clinical settings.

Prevalence and significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with premature ventricular contractions and heart failure treated with vasodilator therapy. Department of Veterans Affairs CHF STAT Investigators

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the prevalence and significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and heart failure treated with vasodilator therapy.

BACKGROUND

Heart failure patients with ventricular arrhythmia and NSVT have a significantly increased risk of premature cardiac death. Recently there has been the question of whether these arrhythmias are expressions of a severely compromised ventricle or are they independent risk factors. We, therefore, determined the prevalence and significance of NSVT in patients with PVCs and heart failure and on vasodilator therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-four hour ambulatory recordings were done at randomization, at 2 weeks, at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 and then every 6 months in 674 patients with heart failure and on vasodilator therapy. The median period of follow-up was 45 months (range 0 to 54).

RESULTS

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was present in 80% of all patients. Patients without (group 1) and with (group 2) NSVT were balanced for variables: age, etiology of heart disease, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, use of amiodarone and diuretics and left ventricular diameter by echocardiogram. However, group 1 patients had significantly less beta-adrenergic blocking agent use and higher ejection fraction (EF) (p < 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Survival analysis for all deaths showed a greater risk of death among group 2 patients (p=0.01). Similarly, sudden death was increased in group 2 patients (p=0.02, risk ratio 1.8). After adjusting for the above variables, only EF (p=0.001) and NYHA class (p=0.01) were shown to be independent predictors of survival. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia showed a trend (p=0.07) as an independent predictor for all-cause mortality but not for sudden death. Only EF was an independent predictor for sudden death.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia is frequently seen in patients with heart failure and may be associated with worsened survival by univariate analysis. However, after adjusting other variables, especially for EF, NSVT was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality or sudden death. These results have serious implications in that suppression of these arrhythmias may not improve survival.