Acceleration of typical atrial flutter due to double-wave reentry induced by programmed electrical stimulation

Case report of a double-wave re-entry atrial flutter in a patient with atrial cardiomyopathy

Background

Double-wave macrore-entry is a rare mechanism of atrial tachycardia with limited documentation in the literature. We present a three-dimensional documentation of a double-wave 'typical' atrial flutter in a patient with extensive atrial cardiomyopathy.

Case summary

A 78-year-old female with a history of atrial cardiomyopathy and dual-chamber pacemaker for sinus node disease presented with palpitations and incessant atrial flutter. Electrophysiological study revealed a regular tachycardia with a cycle length (TCL) of 230 ms, with proximal to distal coronary sinus (CS) activation. Three-dimensional mapping identified two independent wavefronts circulating the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), each with a TCL of 460 ms. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation resulted in conversion into a distinct tachycardia with left atrial roof origin. Linear ablation in this location slowed the TCL to 435 ms with concentric CS activation and another CTI dependent atrial flutter was mapped, this time with only one wavefront of activation. Further ablation with a second, more lateral, line in the CTI led to tachycardia interruption. Given the extensive atrial scarring and high arrhythmic recurrence risk, atrioventricular node ablation was performed.

Discussion

Double-wave re-entrant tachycardias were primarily observed in experimental models, precipitating acceleration of ventricular and supraventricular tachycardias via extrastimulation. In our case, there is documentation of a spontaneous double-wave of activation around the CTI, representing the first documented double-wave 'typical' atrial flutter. Unlike other cases in the literature, the two wavefronts were equidistant, which resulted in a regular tachycardia with TCL that was half of the single-wave cycle length. Three-dimensional propagation mapping was essential to visualize the two distinct wavefronts.

Double-wave reentry in excitable media

A monolayer of chick embryo cardiac cells grown in an annular geometry supports two simultaneous reentrant excitation waves that circulate as a doublet. We propose a mechanism that can lead to such behavior. The velocity restitution gives the instantaneous velocity of a wave as a function of the time since the passage of the previous wave at a given point in space. Nonmonotonic restitution relationships will lead to situations in which various spacings between circulating waves are possible. In cardiology, the situation in which two waves travel in an anatomically defined circuit is referred to as double-wave reentry. Since double-wave reentry may arise as a consequence of pacing during cardiac arrhythmias, understanding the dynamic features of double-wave reentry may be helpful in understanding the physiological properties of cardiac tissue and in the design of therapy.

Variations in duration and composition of the excitable gap around the tricuspid annulus during typical atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Differences in the duration of the excitable gap along the reentry circuit during typical atrial flutter are poorly known.

AIM

To prospectively evaluate and compare the duration and composition of the excitable gap during typical counterclockwise atrial flutter in different parts of the circuit all around the tricuspid annulus.

METHODS

The excitable gap was determined by introducing a premature stimulus at various sites around the tricuspid annulus during typical counterclockwise atrial flutter in 34 patients. Excitable gap was calculated as the difference between the longest resetting coupling interval and the effective atrial refractory period.

RESULTS

The duration of the excitable gap, the effective atrial refractory period and the resetting coupling interval differed significantly along the tricuspid annulus. Duration of excitable gap was significantly longer at the low lateral right atrium (79±22 ms) than at the cavotricuspid isthmus (66±23 ms; P=0.002). The effective atrial refractory period was significantly longer at the cavotricuspid isthmus (160±26 ms) than at the high lateral right atrium (149±29 ms; P=0.004). Other locations, such as coronary sinus ostium, right atrial septum and atrial roof displayed intermediate values.

CONCLUSION

The duration of the excitable gap differed significantly along the tricuspid annulus, with a larger excitable gap at the lateral right atrium and a shorter excitable gap at the cavotricuspid isthmus, because of longer refractory periods at the isthmus.

Alternans amplification following a two-stimulus protocol in a one-dimensional cardiac ionic model of reentry: from annihilation to double-wave quasiperiodic reentry

Electrical pacing is a common procedure in both experimental and clinical settings to study and/or annihilate anatomical reentry. A previous study [Comtois and Vinet, Chaos 12, 903 (2002)] has described new ways to terminate reentry in a one-dimensional loop model by a protocol consisting of only two stimulations. Annihilation of the reentrant activity was much more likely with these new scenarios than through a unidirectional block. This paper investigates the sensitivity of these scenarios of annihilation to the length of the pathway. It shows that double-pulse stimulation can stop the reentry if the circuit is shorter than a limiting length. Beyond this upper limit, stimulation rather yields sustained double-wave reentry. The same dynamical mechanism, labeled alternans amplification, is found to be responsible for these two types of post-stimulus dynamics.

Atrial flutter: from ECG to electroanatomical 3D mapping

Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia that may cause significant symptoms, including palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain and even syncope. Frequently it’s possible to diagnose atrial flutter with a 12-lead surface ECG, looking for distinctive waves in leads II, III, aVF, aVL, V1,V2. Puech and Waldo developed the first classification of atrial flutter in the 1970s. These authors divided the arrhythmia into type I and type II. Therefore, in 2001 the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology developed a new classification of atrial flutter, based not only on the ECG, but also on the electrophysiological mechanism. New developments in endocardial mapping, including the electroanatomical 3D mapping system, have greatly expanded our understanding of the mechanism of arrhythmias. More recently, Scheinman et al, provided an updated classification and nomenclature. The terms like common, uncommon, typical, reverse typical or atypical flutter are abandoned because they may generate confusion. The authors worked out a new terminology, which differentiates atrial flutter only on the basis of electrophysiological mechanism.

Usefulness and limitations of the surface electrocardiogram in the classification of right and left atrial flutter

Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia that may cause significant symptoms, including palpitations, dyspnoea, chest pain and even syncope. Frequently, it is possible to diagnose atrial flutter with a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG), looking for distinctive waves in leads II, III, aVF, aVL, V1 and V2. Puech and Waldo developed the first classification of atrial flutter in the 1970s. These authors divided the dysrhythmia into types I and II. Therefore, in 2001, the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology developed a new classification of atrial flutter based not only on the ECG, but also on the electrophysiological mechanism. More recently, Scheinman and colleagues have provided an updated classification and nomenclature. Terms such as common, uncommon, typical, reverse typical or atypical flutter are abandoned, because they may generate confusion. The authors worked out a new terminology, which differentiates atrial flutter only on the basis of electrophysiological mechanism.

The interrelationship between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

For a long time, it has been known that atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter have a close clinical interrelationship. Recent electrophysiological studies, especially mapping studies, have significantly advanced our understanding of this interrelationship. Regarding the relationship of atrial fibrillation with atrial flutter: Atrial fibrillation of variable duration precedes the onset of atrial flutter in almost all instances. During the atrial fibrillation, the functional components needed to complete the atrial flutter reentrant circuit, principally a line of block between the venae cavae, are formed. If this line of block does not form, classical atrial flutter does not develop. If this line of block shortens or disappears, classical atrial flutter disappears. In fact, it is fair to say that the major determinant of whether atrial fibrillation persists or classical atrial flutter develops is whether a line of block forms between the venae cavae. Regarding the relationship of atrial flutter with atrial fibrillation: Studies in experimental models and now in patients have demonstrated that a driver (a rapidly firing focus or a reentrant circuit of very short cycle length) can cause atrial fibrillation by producing fibrillatory conduction to the rest of the atria. When the driver is a stable reentrant circuit of very short cycle length, it is, in effect, a very fast form of atrial flutter. There probably is a spectrum of reentrant circuits of short cycle length, i.e., "atrial flutter," that depend, in part, on where the reentrant circuit is located. When the cycle length of the reentrant circuit is so short that it will only activate small portions of the atria in a 1:1 manner, the rest of the atria will be activated rapidly but irregularly, i.e., via fibrillatory conduction, resulting in atrial fibrillation. In short, there are probably several mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, one of which is due to a very rapid atrial flutter circuit causing fibrillatory conduction. In sum, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter have an important interrelationship.

Reentry Within the Cavotricuspid Isthmus: An Isthmus Dependent Circuit

BACKGROUND

We describe a new cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) circuit.

METHODS

This study includes 8 patients referred for atrial flutter (AFL) ablation whose tachycardia circuit was confined to the septal CTI and the os of the coronary sinus (CS(OS)) region. Entrainment mapping was performed within the CTI, CS(OS), and other right atrial annular sites (tricuspid annulus (TA)). Electroanatomic mapping was available in 2 patients.

RESULTS

Sustained AFL occurred in all patients with mean tachycardia cycle length (TCL) of 318 +/- 54 (276 - 420) ms. During tachycardia, fractionated or double potentials were recorded at either the septal CTI and/or the region of CS(OS) in all, and concealed entrainment with post-pacing interval (PPI)--TCL < or = 25 ms occurred in this area; but manifest entrainment with PPI > TCL was demonstrated from the anteroinferior CTI and other annular sites in 7/8 patients. In one, tachycardia continued with conduction block at the anteroinferior CTI during ablation. Up to three different right atrial activation patterns (identical TCL) were observed. The tachycardia showed a counterclockwise (CCW) pattern in 6, a clockwise pattern in 2, and simultaneous activation of both low lateral right atrium and septum in 5. Electroanatomic mapping was available in 2, showing an early area arising from the septal CTI in 1, and a CCW activation sequence along the TA in another. Radiofrequency application to the septal CTI terminated tachycardia in 4, and tachycardia no longer inducible in all.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a tachycardia circuit confined to the septal CTI/CS(OS) region, and hypothesize that this circuit involves slow conduction within the CTI and around the CS(OS), which acts as a central obstacle.

Effect of chronic amiodarone therapy on excitable gap during typical human atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION

Class I antiarrhythmic drugs increase duration of the excitable gap (EG) during typical atrial flutter whereas intravenous class III drugs decrease the EG. The effect of chronic oral amiodarone therapy on the EG is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

EG was prospectively determined by introducing a premature stimulus and analyzing the response pattern during typical atrial flutter in 30 patients without antiarrhythmic drugs and in 20 patients under chronic oral amiodarone therapy. EG was calculated by the difference between the longest coupling interval leading to resetting and the effective atrial refractory period (EARP). A fully EG was defined by the portion of EG where the response curve of the return cycles was flat. A partially EG was defined by the portion of EG where the return cycle increases while coupling interval decreases. A resetting response curve was constructed by plotting the duration of the return cycle against the value of the coupling interval. Cycle length (CL; 222 +/- 17 vs 267 +/- 20 msec, P < 0.0001), EARP (128 +/- 16 vs 152 +/- 18 msec, P < 0.0001), and EG (54 +/- 19 vs 70 +/- 21 msec, P = 0.01) were significantly longer in patients taking amiodarone than in controls. Compared to CL, the relative part of the EARP (57 +/- 7 vs 57 +/- 6%, P = 0.96) and EG (24 +/- 7 vs 26 +/- 8%, P = 0.41) were comparable in both groups. The fully EG was larger in patients under chronic amiodarone therapy than in controls (39 +/- 21 vs 26 +/- 20 msec, P = 0.03). Neither duration of the partially EG (28 +/- 15 vs 31 +/- 15 msec, P = 0.42) nor slope of the ascending portion of the resetting response curve (1.15 +/- 0.5 vs 1.13 +/- 0.4 msec/msec, P = 0.71) differed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

EG in patients under chronic amiodarone therapy is significantly larger than in controls, mainly because of a longer fully EG. This observation may be explained by opposite effects on conduction velocity and refractoriness.

Atypical flutter: a review

Understanding of typical flutter circuits led the way to the study of other forms of macroreentrant tachycardias of the atria, and to their treatment by catheter ablation. It has become evident that the ECG classification of atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia by a rate cutoff and the presence or absence of isoelectric baselines between atrial deflections is not a valid indicator of tachycardia mechanism. Macroreentrant circuits where activation rotates around large obstacles are the most common arrhythmias found in patients with atypical forms of flutter or atrial tachycardia, especially after surgery for congenital heart disease, however, focal mechanisms can also be found. Large areas of low voltage electrograms, suggestive of severe myocardial damage (fibrosis or infiltration) can be found in many atypical macroreentrant tachycardias at the center of the circuit. Many of these circuits can be mapped precisely, critical isthmuses can be defined, and effective catheter ablation can be performed. The need to match activation maps with anatomy precisely, makes computer assisted, anatomically precise mapping a useful tool. Entrainment techniques have to be used sparingly to avoid tachycardia interruption. In complex cases, ablation can be done in sinus rhythm, after definition of conducting channels between low voltage areas and scars or anatomic obstacles. Long-term prognosis is uncertain and depends on the underlying pathology.

Interactions Between Extracellular Stimuli and Excitation Waves in an Atrial Reentrant Loop

Extracellular Stimuli in an Atrial Reentrant Loop.

INTRODUCTION

The interactions between extracellular stimuli and excitation waves propagating in a reentrant loop are a complex function of stimulus parameters, structural properties, membrane state, and timing. Here the goal was a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms and frequencies of the major interactions between the advancing excitation wave and a single extracellular stimulus, separated from issues of anatomic or geometric complexity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A modernized computer model of a thin ring of uniform tissue that included a pair of extracellular stimulus electrodes (anode/cathode) was used to model one-dimensional cardiac reentry. Questions and results included the following: (1) What are the major interactions between a stimulus and the reentrant propagation wave, and are they induced near the cathode or near the anode; and, for each interaction, what are the initiating amplitude range and timing interval? At the cathode, the well-known mechanism of retrograde excitation terminated reentry; changes in timing or amplitude produced double-wave reentry or phase reset. At the anode, termination occurred at different cells depending on stimulus amplitude. (2) Relatively how often did termination occur at the anode? For most stimulus amplitudes, termination occurred more often at the anode than at the cathode, although not always at the same cell. (3) With random timing, what is the probability of terminating reentry? Stimulation for 5 msec terminated reentry with a probability from 0% to approximately 10%, as a function of increasing stimulus amplitude.

CONCLUSION

A single extracellular stimulus can initiate major changes in reentrant excitation via multiple mechanisms, even in a simple geometry. Termination of reentry, phase shifts, or double-wave reentry each occurs over well-defined ranges of stimulus amplitude and timing.

Inter-relationships between atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation

It has been appreciated for a long time that atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation have a clinical relationship. Now, with the technological advances that permit more sophisticated electrophysiological studies, especially mapping studies, we have significantly advanced our understanding of this interrelationship. Regarding the relationship at atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter: Atrial fibrillation of variable duration (very brief to prolonged episodes) precedes the onset of atrial flutter in most instances. It seems that during the period of atrial fibrillation, the functional components of the atrial flutter reentrant circuit are formed. This is principally a line of block between the venae cavae. If this line of block does not form, classical atrial flutter does not form. And if this line of block shortens or disappears, classical atrial flutter disappear as well. In fact, it might be said that the major difference in whether classical atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation develops is whether a line of block forms between the venae cavae. Regarding the relationship of atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation: Studies have demonstrated that a driver (a single focus or reentrant circuit of very short cycle length) can be responsible for causing atrial fibrillation by producing fibrillatory conduction to the rest of the atria. In experimental models and now beginning to be demonstrated in patients, this driver may be a stable reentrant circuit of very short cycle length, i.e., a fast form of atrial flutter, if you will. In fact, there is probably a spectrum of these short cycle lengths that depend, in part, on where the reentrant circuit (i.e., "atrial flutter") exists. When the stable reentrant circuit is of sufficiently short cycle length, it will only activate small portions of the atria in a 1 : 1 manner. The rest of the atria will be activated irregularly, resulting in atrial fibrillation. Unstable reentrant circuits can also do the same thing. In short, it appears that there are several mechanisms of atrial fibrillation, one of which is due to a form of very rapid atrial flutter.

Mechanism of conversion of atypical right atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation

The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanisms of conversion from atypical atrial flutter (AFL) to atrial fibrillation (AF), and the long-term results of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 221 patients with typical AFL referred to our hospital for ablation. A total of 25 patients had atypical AFL, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 23 with isthmus-dependent atypical AFL, as well as in 180 patients with typical counterclockwise and/or clockwise AFL. In all, 13 spontaneous transitions from atypical AFL to AF were documented in 11 of 17 patients. Before AF, a pattern of lower loop reentry was observed in 11 of 13 patients (85%) and upper loop reentry in 3 (1 had both). Multiple early breaks along the tricuspid annulus during AFL were noted in 6 of 13 patients (46%). Among the 13 transitions, discrete atrial premature complexes before AF were found in 5 patients with lower loop reentry and in 1 with upper loop reentry (46%). In the remaining patients, a more rapid atrial rhythm was involved in the development of AF with a pulmonary venous focus in 2. In some cases, additional "breaks" in the functional line of block occurred before the development of AF. There was a significant increased incidence of AF (68%) in those with atypical AFL compared with those with typical AFL (38%) (p = 0.004). After a mean follow-up of 28 +/- 9 months for the atypical group and 18 +/- 11 months for the typical group, the AF recurrence rate was similar (57% vs 48%, p = 0.4). Discrete atrial premature complexes or atrial tachycardia may initiate AF either directly or by producing further breaks in lines of functional block. Bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block is associated with cure or control of AF in approximately 50% of patients with AFL.

Characterization of the anatomy and conduction velocities of the human right atrial flutter circuit determined by noncontact mapping

OBJECTIVES

This study was done to characterize human right atrial (RA) flutter (AFL) using noncontact mapping.

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter has been mapped using sequential techniques, but complex anatomy makes simultaneous global RA mapping difficult.

METHODS

Noncontact mapping was used to map the RA of 13 patients with AFL (5 with previous attempts), 11 with counterclockwise and 2 with clockwise AFL. "Reconstructed" electrograms were validated against contact electrograms using cross-correlation. The Cartesian coordinates of points on a virtual endocardium were used to calculate the length and thus the conduction velocity (CV) of the AFL wave front within the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cave isthmus (IS) and either side of the crista terminalis (CT).

RESULTS

When clearly seen, the AFL wave front split (n = 3) or turned in the region of the coronary sinus os (n = 6). Activation progressed toward the tricuspid annulus (TA) from the surrounding RA in 10 patients, suggesting that the leading edge of the reentry wave front is not always at the TA. The IS length and CV was 47.73 +/- 24.40 mm (mean +/- SD) and 0.74 +/- 0.36 m/s. The CV was similar for the smooth and trabeculated RA (1.16 +/- 0.48 m/s and 1.22 +/- 0.65 m/s, respectively [p = 0.67]) and faster than the IS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05 for smooth and trabeculated, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontact mapping of AFL has been validated and has demonstrated that IS CV is significantly slower than either side of the CT.

Electrical conduits within the inferior atrial region exhibit preferential roles in interatrial activation

Differences between conduction properties of interatrial conduits and their roles in initiation and maintenance of supraventricular arrhythmias remain unclear. Our objective was to determine details of interatrial activation in inferior atrial region and to correlate intra-atrial and interatrial activation patterns with the site of origin of atrial ectopic activation. In 9 dogs, basket-catheters carrying 64 electrodes were deployed into both the right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA). A 10-electrode catheter was inserted into the coronary sinus (CS). Activation patterns of the RA, LA, and CS were compared during pacing in the CS, in RA inferoparaseptum posterior to Eustachian ridge-tendon of Todaro (TT), and in inferior RA near the CS ostium (anterior to TT). We found that pacing in proximal and middle CS resulted in a RA breakthrough invariably at the CS ostium, consistent with conduction through a CS-RA connection. Meanwhile, LA breakthrough emerged in inferoposterior region (inferior to mitral annulus), suggesting conduction through a CS-LA connection. While pacing in distal CS, LA breakthrough shifted to middle posterolateral wall. Whereas, the RA was activated by the LA directly through the septum. During pacing in RA inferoparaseptum posterior to TT, the LA was activated directly through the septum at 22 +/- 4 ms. Whereas, during pacing anterior to TT, the LA was activated through both the CS and the septum while earliest activation was delayed by 38 +/- 5 ms. In conclusion, both the interatrial septum and CS musculature form electrical conduits in inferior atrial region in canine. Differences in activation properties between the conduits in inferior interatrial region result in selective interatrial activation patterns during ectopic activation.

A peculiar form of focal atrial tachycardia mimicking atypical atrial flutter

A 55-year-old man was referred because of congestive heart failure and atrial flutter. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showed positive P waves in leads II, III, and aVF with a continuously undulating pattern that lacked an isoelectric baseline. Tachycardia was diagnosed as atypical atrial flutter based on classical criteria. An electrophysiological study and catheter ablation using an electroanatomical system revealed the mechanism of the tachycardia to be focal atrial tachycardia originating from the left atrial roof. This case indicates that focal atrial tachycardia may present as atypical atrial flutter on the surface ECG.

Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: is a cure at hand?

The mechanisms of atrial fibrillation relate to the presence of random reentry involving multiple interatrial circuits. Triggers for development of atrial fibrillation include rapidly discharging atrial foci (mainly from pulmonary veins) or degeneration of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia into fibrillation. Therapy for control of atrial fibrillation includes drugs, atrial pacing for those with sinus node dysfunction, or ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Therapeutic maneuvers for cure of atrial fibrillation include surgical or radiofrequency catheter induced linear lesions to reduce the atrial tissue and prevent the requisite number of reentrant wavelets. We need a much better understanding of basic mechanisms before a true cure is at hand.

What is the relationship of atrial flutter and fibrillation?

Animal models and human studies of atrial activation mapping and entrainment have considerably enhanced our understanding of the anatomical substrate for atrial flutter and created the basis for a definite cure with radiofrequency catheter ablation. As atrial flutter has now become a curable arrhythmia, emphasis is shifting to understand the most common arrhythmia: atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, from clinical observation, it is apparent that there is a relationship between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients with atrial arrhythmias. Techniques that have informed our understanding of the anatomical basis of atrial flutter may also be useful in understanding the relationship between atrial fibrillation and flutter, including animal models, clinical endocardial mapping, and intracardiac anatomical imaging. Thus, atrial anatomy and its relationship to electrophysiological findings, and the role of partial or complete conduction barriers around which reentry can and cannot occur, may be of importance for atrial fibrillation as well. Ultimately, the relationship between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter may inform our understanding of the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation itself, and help to develop new approaches to device, catheter-based, and pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation.

The architecture of the atrial musculature between the orifice of the inferior caval vein and the tricuspid valve: the anatomy of the isthmus

INTRODUCTION

Electrophysiologists recognize a so-called "isthmus" in the right atrium through which passes the reentrant circuit of common atrial flutter. Ablative lesions placed in this narrow channel have proved effective in breaking the circuit. To the best of our knowledge, however, no study has been performed to establish the arrangement and orientation of the atrial myocardial fibers in this crucial area.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined 28 normal heart specimens, identifying a quadrilateral area composed of three morphologic sectors between the inferior caval vein and the tricuspid valve confluent superiorly with the triangle of Koch. Within this quadrilateral, there are constant recesses, or sinuses, inferior and lateral to the orifice of the coronary sinus. The inferior isthmus measured an average of 31+/-4 mm (range 19 to 40). Gross examination identified marked differences in the atrial wall forming the quadrilateral. A smooth anterior component forming the vestibule of the tricuspid valve was found in all the hearts, but variations in the remaining sectors were seen in ten specimens. The usually membranous posterior sector was noticeably muscular in three specimens, while the middle, trabecular sector was more membranous in five specimens. We demonstrated the orientation of the subendocardial atrial fibers by dissection in 14 specimens, revealing a relatively constant overall pattern in eight specimens and variations in fiber orientation in the remaining specimens.

CONCLUSION

There are considerable anatomic variations in the atrial wall that comprises the so-called isthmus. The presence of recesses and membranous areas in some hearts and the variations in arrangement of the subendocardial fibers are relevant in improving understanding of conduction in this area.

Double-wave reentry in orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia: paradoxical shortening of the tachycardia cycle length with development of ipsilateral bundle branch block

INTRODUCTION

Attempts to terminate reentrant tachyarrhythmias by rapid pacing may accelerate the tachycardia. One mechanism for acceleration is double-wave reentry, where two simultaneous wavefronts travel around the same circuit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report pacing acceleration of AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) due to double-wave reentry in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The patient had presented with atrial fibrillation and rapid conduction across a left lateral bypass tract. Intravenous procainamide was given during electrophysiologic study because of incessant atrial fibrillation and restored sinus rhythm. Orthodromic AVRT was induced and attempts to terminate the AVRT with right ventricular pacing initiated two alternate tachycardias, both with a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. The first tachycardia, as expected for bundle branch block ipsilateral to the bypass tract, had a longer cycle length (CL) than the original tachycardia (366 msec compared to 297 msec). The second tachycardia had a paradoxically shorter CL, 238 msec compared to 297 msec. Electrogram analysis revealed that the circuit traversed by the accelerated LBBB tachycardia was the same as the slower LBBB tachycardia. The activation sequence revealed two independent wavefronts, traversing this common circuit. As described previously in experimental models, double-wave reentry was initiated when an antidromic-stimulated impulse blocked before colliding with the previous orthodromic impulse, thus allowing two orthodromic impulses to circulate within the circuit.

CONCLUSION

We speculate that conduction slowing by procainamide combined with the intrinsic AV nodal delay resulted in the necessary increase in the excitable gap required to develop double-wave reentry. This is the first description of sustained double-wave reentry in humans.