Sympathoinhibition by central and peripheral infusion of nifedipine in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: a literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS

Calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) constitute a diverse group of compounds but are often referred to as a single homogeneous class of drug and the clinical responses indiscriminately summarized. Even within the dihydropyridine subgroup, there are significant differences in formulations, pharmacokinetics, durations of action and their effects on blood pressure, heart rate, end organs and the sympathetic nervous system. Amlodipine and nifedipine in the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation are the most studied of the once-daily CCBs. Amlodipine has an inherently long pharmacokinetic half-life, whereas, in contrast, nifedipine has an inherently short half-life but in the GITS formulation the sophisticated delivery system allows for once-daily dosing. This article is derived from a systematic review of the published literature in hypertensive patients. The following search terms in three main databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index) from 1990 to 2011 were utilized: amlodipine, nifedipine, sympathetic nervous system, sympathetic response, sympathetic nerve activity, noradrenaline, norepinephrine and heart rate. More than 1500 articles were then screened to derive the relevant analysis. As markers of sympathetic nervous system activation, studies of plasma norepinephrine concentrations, power spectral analysis, muscle sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine spillover were reviewed. Overall, each drug lowered blood pressure in hypertensive patients in association with only small changes in heart rate (i.e. <1 beat/min). Plasma norepinephrine concentrations, as the most widely reported marker of sympathetic nervous system activity, showed greater increases in patients treated with amlodipine than with nifedipine GITS. The evidence indicates that both these once-daily dihydropyridine CCBs lower blood pressure effectively with minimal effects on heart rate. There are small differences between the drugs in the extent to which each activates the sympathetic nervous system with an overall non-significant trend in favour of nifedipine GITS.

AT(1) receptor blockers increase insulin-like growth factor-I production by stimulating sensory neurons in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is an important cardioprotective substance. We previously reported that sensory neuron stimulation increases IGF-I production by releasing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Because angiotensin II (Ang II) inhibits sensory neuron activation by interacting with Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) receptors, it is possible that AT(1) receptor blockers (ARBs) increase IGF-I production in SHRs. We examined this possibility in the current study, using the ARBs olmesartan, valsartan, losartan, and telmisartan. Plasma, renal, and cardiac levels of CGRP and IGF-I in SHRs were significantly lower than those in normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats (WKYs) (P < 0.01), which increased to levels found in WKYs after the administration of ARBs. These ARB-induced increases in SHRs were completely reversed by pretreatment with capsazepine (CPZ), which is a specific vanilloid receptor-1 (VR-1) antagonist. The mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was decreased after administration of ARBs in SHRs, and those decreases were reversed by pretreatment with CPZ. The administration of nifedipine decreased MABP but did not increase CGRP or IGF-I levels in SHRs. Baseline CGRP release and cellular cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) levels in dorsal root ganglion neurons (DRG) isolated from SHRs were significantly lower than those in DRG isolated from WKYs (P < 0.01). Although ARBs reversed decreases in CGRP release and cAMP levels in the presence of Ang II in DRG isolated from WKYs, they increased CGRP release and cAMP levels in the absence of Ang II in DRG isolated from SHRs. Cellular levels of Ang II were not detected in DRG isolated from WKYs or SHRs, but messenger RNA (mRNA) levels for angiotensin-converting enzyme in DRG were significantly higher in SHRs than in WKYs (P < 0.01). The expression of AT(1) receptors in DRG was not different between WKYs and SHRs. Thus, it is likely that decreases in CGRP release and cAMP levels in DRG isolated from SHRs are mainly caused by AT(1) receptor activation by Ang II through an autocrine mechanism. These observations suggest that ARBs might increase CGRP release from sensory neurons by sensitizing VR-1 activation through increases in cAMP levels, which thereby increased the production of IGF-I in SHRs. These activities of ARBs might at least partly explain their therapeutic effects in areas such as improving insulin resistance in patients with diabetes and hypertension.

Long-acting calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the brain and inhibits sympathetic nerve activity

Nitric oxide (NO) in the central nervous system inhibits sympathetic nerve activity, thereby decreasing blood pressure. It is unknown, however, whether orally administered antihypertensive treatment alters NO synthase (NOS) expression, particularly in the brain, and how changes in NOS expression affects sympathetic nerve activity. Azelnidipine, a recently developed long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, does not cause baroreflex-induced tachycardia. The aim of the present study was to determine whether antihypertensive treatment with azelnidipine alters endothelial NOS (eNOS), neuronal NOS (nNOS), or inducible NOS (iNOS) expression in the brain, and how changes in NOS affect sympathetic nerve activity. Azelnidipine (20 mg/kg/day) or hydralazine (20 mg/kg/day) was orally administered for 30 days in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). Blood pressure and heart rate were measured by the tail cuff method. Urinary norepinephrine excretion was measured as a marker of sympathetic nerve activity. Western blot analysis was performed to examine eNOS, nNOS, or iNOS expression levels in the brain (cortex, cerebellum, hypothalamus, and the brain stem), heart, and aorta. The extent of blood pressure reduction was similar between the two groups. Heart rate increased in the hydralazine-treated group but did not change in the azelnidipine-treated group. Urinary norepinephrine excretion was significantly increased only in the hydralazine-treated group. Treatment with azelnidipine significantly increased eNOS expression levels in the brain, heart, and aorta, but did not alter nNOS or iNOS expression levels. Treatment with hydralazine did not change any of the NOS expression levels. These results suggest that antihypertensive treatment with azelnidipine attenuates reflex-induced sympathetic activation and enhances eNOS expression levels in the brain as well as in the heart and aorta.

Azelnidipine Attenuates Cardiovascular and Sympathetic Responses to Air-Jet Stress in Genetically Hypertensive Rats

Azelnidipine is a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that causes minimal stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system despite its significant depressor effect. In the present study, we examined the effects of oral or intravenous administration of azelnidipine on cardiovascular and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) responses to air-jet stress in conscious, unrestrained stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Oral administration of high-dose azelnidipine (10 mg/kg per day) or nicardipine (150 mg/kg per day) for 10 days caused a significant and comparable decrease in blood pressure, but low-dose azelnidipine (3 mg/kg per day) did not. Air-jet stress increased mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and RSNA. High-dose azelnidipine significantly attenuated the increases in MAP, HR and RSNA in response to air-jet stress while nicardipine did not. Low-dose azelnidipine significantly attenuated the pressor response with a trend of decrease in RSNA. Intravenous injection of azelnidipine induced a slowly developing depressor effect. To obtain a similar time course of decrease in MAP by azelnidipine, nicardipine was continuously infused at adjusted doses. Both drugs increased HR and RSNA significantly, while the change in RSNA was smaller in the azelnidipine group. In addition, intravenous administration of azelnidipine attenuated the responses of MAP, HR, and RSNA to air-jet stress; by comparison, the inhibitory actions of nicardipine were weak. In conclusion, oral or intravenous administration of azelnidipine inhibited cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to air-jet stress. This action of azelnidipine may be mediated at least in part by the inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system.

Amlodipine-induced reduction of oxidative stress in the brain is associated with sympatho-inhibitory effects in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

Amlodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that is widely used for the treatment of hypertensive patients and has an antioxidant effect on vessels in vitro. The aim of the present study was to examine whether treatment with amlodipine reduced oxidative stress in the brains of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). The animals received amlodipine, nicardipine or hydralazine for 30 days in their drinking water. Levels of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) in the brain (cortex, cerebellum, hypothalamus, and brainstem) were measured before and after each treatment. Systolic blood pressure decreased to similar levels in the amlodipine-, nicardipine-, and hydralazine-treated groups. Urinary norepinephrine excretion was significantly reduced in SHRSP after treatment with amlodipine, but not with nicardipine or hydralazine. Levels of TBARS in the cortex, cerebellum, hypothalamus, and brainstem were significantly higher in SHRSP than in Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), and were reduced in amlodipine-treated, but not in nicardipine- or hydralazine-treated, SHRSP. Electron spin resonance spectroscopy revealed increased levels of reactive oxygen species in the brains of SHRSP, which were reduced by treatment with amlodipine. Intracisternal infusion of amlodipine also reduced systolic blood pressure, urinary norepinephrine excretion, and the levels of TBARS in the brain. These results suggested that oxidative stress in the brain was enhanced in SHRSP compared with WKY rats. In addition, antihypertensive treatment with amlodipine reduced oxidative stress in all areas of the brain examined and decreased blood pressure without a reflex increase in sympathetic nerve activity in SHRSP.

Effects of low-dose nifedipine GITS on sympathetic activity in young and older patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyridines have both sympathoexcitatory and sympathoinhibitory effects. To date, the latter have been characterized only in animals. During chronic treatment with long-acting dihydropyridines, sympathoexcitatory effects mediated via the arterial baroreflex are unlikely. However, increases in plasma angiotensin II in response to dihydropyridines could contribute to increases in sympathetic activity during chronic treatment. Such increases may be less in older than in young patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with low-dose nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS; 20 mg/day) compared with placebo on muscle sympathetic nerve activity and plasma noradrenaline, in relation to changes in plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin II and blood pressure in young and older patients with mild hypertension.

RESULTS

Nifedipine GITS decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly, by 10 +/- 3 mmHg and 7 +/- 2 mmHg respectively, in older patients (age 67 +/- 2 years), but not in younger patients (age 45 +/- 2 years) (decreases of 1 +/- 3 mmHg and 1 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively). Nifedipine GITS caused only minor changes in plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin II in young and older patients. Compared with changes in response to placebo (-5.7 +/- 2.4 bursts/min), sympathetic activity was increased significantly by nifedipine GITS in the young patients (2.0 +/- 1.7 bursts/min; P < 0.05), but not in older patients (5.4 +/- 1.3 bursts/min by placebo compared with 4.1 +/- 3.5 bursts/min by nifedipine GITS).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that age-related differences in the response of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (and plasma noradrenaline) to low-dose nifedipine GITS in patients with mild hypertension are unlikely to be mediated by plasma angiotensin II. An increase in sympathetic activity may contribute to the absent blood pressure response in young patients with hypertension.

Sympathoinhibitory and depressor effects of amlodipine in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The authors examined whether central actions contribute to the hypotensive effects of peripherally administered amlodipine, a lipophilic dihydropyridine with slow onset and long duration of action. After 5 to 6 weeks of high (8%, H-Na) or regular (0.6%, R-Na) salt intake, changes in renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded at rest and in response to intravenous (iv) and intracerebroventricular (icv) injection, and prolonged iv infusion of amlodipine, in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Iv injection of amlodipine at 50 to 100 microg/kg decreased MAP but increased RSNA and HR in a dose-related manner. In contrast, icv injection of amlodipine at 10 to 50 microg/kg caused parallel decreases in MAP, RSNA, and HR. Iv infusion of amlodipine at 50 microg/kg per hour for 3 hours followed by 100 microg/kg per hour for 2 hours also decreased in parallel RSNA, MAP, and HR. Maximal decreases in RSNA, MAP, and HR in response to icv injection and iv infusion were significantly larger in SHR on H-Na versus R-Na. All responses lasted at least 1 hour following iv and icv injection, or after the termination of iv infusion of amlodipine. These data suggest that in SHR during prolonged iv infusion, amlodipine appears to cross the blood-brain barrier, block brain l-type Ca2+ channels, and decrease sympathetic outflow and thereby BP. Central actions may prevail during iv infusion of amlodipine at low rates, and the decrease in BP is associated with sympathoinhibition. High salt intake markedly enhances its sympathoinhibitory action, likely through central mechanisms.

Calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of hypertension

Calcium channel antagonists are widely used antihypertensive agents. Their popularity among primary care physicians is not only due to their blood pressure-lowering effects, but also because they appear to be effective regardless of the age or ethnic background of the patients. The first available calcium channel antagonists utilized immediate-release formulations which, although effective in patients with angina pectoris, were not approved by the US FDA for use in hypertension. When long-acting once-daily formulations were approved in this indication, the short-acting preparations--which had by then become generic and inexpensive--retained some residual unapproved use for hypertension. An observational case-controlled trial, based on such usage, noted that these agents were associated with a greater risk of myocardial infarctions than conventional agents such as diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Further case-controlled trials showed, in fact, that the dangers of calcium channel antagonists were confined to the short-acting agents and that approved long-acting agents were at least as well tolerated and effective as other antihypertensive drugs. Cardiovascular outcomes during treatment with calcium channel antagonists have been examined in randomized, controlled trials. Compared with placebo, the calcium channel antagonists clearly prevented strokes and other cardiovascular events and reduced mortality. The effects of these agents on survival and clinical outcomes were similar to those with other antihypertensive drugs. There is a slight tendency for the calcium channel antagonists to be more effective than other drug types in preventing stroke, but slightly less effective in preventing coronary events. These observations extend to high-risk patients with hypertension including those with diabetes mellitus. Even so, patients with evidence of nephropathy should not receive monotherapy with calcium channel antagonists. Such patients are optimally treated with angiotensin receptor antagonists or ACE inhibitors, although addition of other drugs, including calcium channel antagonists, is often required to achieve the tight blood pressure control necessary to provide adequate renal protection. Calcium channel antagonists have a highly acceptable tolerability profile and careful reviews of available data have shown that their use is not associated with increased bleeding or promotion of tumor formation. It is now recognized that reduction of blood pressure in patients with hypertension to levels often <130/85 mm Hg should be undertaken in presence of other cardiovascular risk factors or evidence of end organ damage. Because of this important concept, calcium channel antagonists, like the other antihypertensive drug classes, are progressively being prescribed less often as monotherapy, but more typically as part of combination regimens.

Enalaprilat blunts reflexive increases in cardiac interstitial norepinephrine in conscious rats

OBJECTIVE

We have reported that acute administration of enalaprilat, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, induces less reflexive increase in lumbar sympathetic nerve activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) than nicardipine, a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker. The current study was conducted to determine if angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors likewise suppress cardiac sympathetic activation.

DESIGN

Cardiac interstitial levels of norepinephrine were measured in fully conscious SHRs before and after acute blood pressure lowering with enalaprilat or nicardipine.

METHODS

Microdialysis probes were inserted into the left ventricular wall of SHRs. Twenty-four to 48 hours post-implantation, myocardial interstitial fluid was collected in fully conscious rats during a 60-min baseline period. Mean arterial pressure was lowered 20 mmHg with intravenous infusion of enalaprilat or nicardipine. During continuous enalaprilat or nicardipine infusion, myocardial interstitial fluid was again collected. Norepinephrine levels were assayed in the perfusate.

CONCLUSIONS

Enalaprilat-induced reduction in mean arterial pressure did not significantly increase cardiac interstitial norepinephrine levels. In contrast, nicardipine-induced reduction in blood pressure was associated with a significant increase in interstitial norepinephrine levels. These results indicate that enalaprilat suppresses reflexive sympathetic activation of the heart during acute blood pressure lowering. These results may be clinically relevant in that reductions in end-organ sympathetic stimulation may enhance the long-term cardiovascular benefit of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Central sympathoinhibitory effects of calcium channel blockers

It is generally assumed that the arterial vasodilation induced by inhibition of Ca(2+) influx into vascular smooth muscle cells represents the main mechanism for the hypotensive effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. Increases in sympathetic tone have been related to activation of the arterial baroreflex by rapid lowering of blood pressure. This review highlights new findings in two areas. First, in animal studies, direct central administration of dihydropyridines such as nifedipine or amlodipine lowers sympathetic nerve activity and thereby blood pressure. Peripheral administration of nifedipine or amlodipine at low rates appears to result in gradual accumulation of drug in the central nervous system, and also causes lowering of sympathetic nerve activity and thereby lowering of blood pressure (rather than by arterial vasodilation). Second, in hypertensive humans treated with long-acting dihydropyridines and presumably little activation of the arterial baroreflex, some studies have demonstrated lowering of sympathetic activity (as assessed by plasma norepinephrine), but others reported increases (as assessed by plasma norepinephrine or microneurography). This sympathoexcitatory response may be due to activation of the renin-angiotensin system, particularly at higher doses.

Sympathoinhibitory and depressor responses to long-term infusion of nifedipine in spontaneously hypertensive rats on high-salt diet

Short-term (by hour) intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) or i.v. infusion of nifedipine at low rates evokes parallel decreases in renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and blood pressure (BP) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). In the present study, effects of long-term administration of nifedipine on BP and control of sympathetic tone were examined in SHR on a high-salt (8%) diet. From 6 to 8 weeks of age, for 2 weeks concomitant with taking a high-salt diet, rats were also treated with subcutaneous infusion of nifedipine at 10, 50, or 100 microg/kg/h or vehicle solvent as control using osmotic minipumps. At the end of the 2-week treatment period, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and RSNA at rest and in response to air-jet stress, i.c.v. injection of the alpha-adrenoceptor agonist guanabenz (25 microg), and i.v. injection of the ganglionic blocker hexamethonium were recorded in conscious rats. In rats on nifedipine 50 or 100 microg/kg/h, resting MAP was significantly lower (136+/-4 or 130+/-4 vs. 145+/-2 mm Hg in control rats, p < 0.05 for both), the sympathoinhibitory and depressor responses to i.c.v. guanabenz were significantly decreased, and the absolute decreases in MAP in response to i.v. injection of hexamethonium were significantly smaller. Sympathoexcitatory and pressor responses to air-jet stress, however, were not affected by nifedipine. Infusion of nifedipine at the three rates for 2 weeks caused concentrations of plasma nifedipine in a dose-related manner. Nifedipine was not detected in tissues of rats treated with 10 microg/kg/h nifedipine but was present in brain and other tissues of rats treated with nifedipine at the two higher rates. Thus in SHR on high-salt intake long-term treatment with nifedipine at 50 or 100 microg/kg/h decreased resting BP and the sympathetic component in BP control. In addition to possible peripheral effects, long-term administration of nifedipine may also act centrally to decrease sympathetic activity and BP, likely by increasing activity in central pathways involving sympathoinhibition, but not in pathways involving sympathoexcitation as evaluated by air-stress.