1
|
Neves Pereira MT, Tinoco M, Castro M, Pinheiro L, Cardoso F, Calvo L, Ribeiro S, Monteiro V, Sanfins V, Lourenço A. Assessing cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients: a comparative analysis of efficacy and outcomes between transvenous and epicardial leads. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2024. [PMID: 38332712 DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.2845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for selected heart failure (HF) patients. Although transvenous implantation is the standard method, it is not feasible in some patients, so the epicardial lead emerges as an alternative. We aim to compare CRT response, procedure-related complications, and the occurrence of clinical outcomes between patients with transvenous and epicardial leads. In a single-center retrospective study, we enrolled consecutive HF patients submitted to CRT implantation with a defibrillator between 2013 and 2022. Clinical response was defined as an improvement of at least one of the New York Heart Association classes with no occurrence of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in the first year of follow-up. Echocardiographic response was attained with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction 10% or a reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic volume >15% at 6-12 months after CRT implantation. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization) and all-cause mortality were evaluated. From a total of 149 patients, 38% (n=57) received an epicardial lead. Clinical (63% versus 60%, p=0.679) and echocardiographic (63% versus 60%, p=0.679) responses were similar between the transvenous and epicardial groups. Patients in the transvenous group had a shorter hospital stay (2 versus 7 days, p<0.001). Procedure-related complications were comparable between groups (24% versus 28%, p=0.572), but left ventricular lead-related complications were more frequent in the transvenous group (14% versus 2%). During a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the rate of MACE was 30% (n=44), with no differences in both groups (p=0.591), neither regarding HF hospitalization (p=0.917) nor cardiovascular mortality (p=0.060). Nevertheless, the epicardial group had a higher rate of all-cause mortality (35% versus 20%, p=0.005), the majority occurring during long-term follow-up (>12 months), with no deaths in the postoperative period. Considering the comparable rates of CRT response, procedure-related complications, and MACE between groups, we conclude that epicardial lead is a feasible alternative for CRT when transvenous lead implantation is not possible. The occurrence of a higher number of all-cause deaths in epicardial patients in the long-term follow-up was mainly due to infectious complications (unrelated to the lead) and the progression of oncological/chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucy Calvo
- Senhora da Oliveira Hospital, Guimarães.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyên UC, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K. Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Current data and potential explanations for the lack of benefit. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:197-205. [PMID: 37806647 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The present article reviews the literature on image-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) studies. Improved outcome to CRT has been associated with the placement of a left ventricular (LV) lead in the latest activated segment free from scar. The majority of randomized controlled trials investigating guided LV lead implantation did not show superiority over conventional implantation approaches. Several factors may contribute to this paradoxical observation, including inclusion criteria favoring patients with left bundle branch block who already respond well to conventional anatomical LV lead implantation, differences in activation wavefronts during simultaneous right ventricular and LV pacing, incorrect definition of target regions, and limitations in coronary venous anatomy that prevent access to target regions that are detected by imaging. It is imperative that exclusion of patients lacking access to target regions from these studies would lead to larger benefit of image-guided CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uyên Châu Nguyên
- Department of Physiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Frits W Prinzen
- Department of Physiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vijayaraman P, Pokharel P, Subzposh FA, Oren JW, Storm RH, Batul SA, Beer DA, Hughes G, Leri G, Manganiello M, Jastremsky JL, Mroczka K, Johns AM, Mascarenhas V. His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy vs Biventricular Pacing: HOT-CRT Clinical Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 9:2628-2638. [PMID: 37715742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) using His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to compare the feasibility and clinical efficacy of HOT-CRT (His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) with BVP in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and indication for CRT. METHODS This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of HOT-CRT and BVP in patients with LVEF <50% and indications for CRT. If HPCSP resulted in incomplete electrical resynchronization, a coronary sinus (CS) lead was added. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major complications. RESULTS A total of 100 patients (female 31%, aged 70 ± 12 years, LVEF 31.5% ± 9.0%) were randomized. HOT-CRT was successful in 48 of 50 (96%) and BVP-CRT in 41 of 50 (82%) patients (P = 0.03). QRS duration significantly decreased from 164 ± 26 ms to 137 ± 20 ms with HOT-CRT and 166 ± 28 ms to 141 ± 19 ms with BVP. Fluoroscopy results (18.8 ± 12.4 min vs 23.8 ± 12.4 min, P = 0.05) and procedure duration (119 ± 42 min vs 114 ± 36 min, P = 0.5) were similar. The primary outcome of change in LVEF at 6 months was greater in HOT-CRT than in BVP (12.4% ± 7.3% vs 8.0% ± 10.1%, P = 0.02). The primary safety endpoint was similar (98% vs 94%, P = 0.62). Echocardiographic response of improvement in LVEF >5% occurred in 80% vs 61% (P = 0.06). Complications occurred in 3 (6%) in HOT-CRT vs 10 (20%) in BVP (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS HPCSP-guided CRT resulted in greater change in LVEF compared with BVP. Randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are necessary. (His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [HOT-CRT]; NCT04561778).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Faiz A Subzposh
- Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jess W Oren
- Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Syeda A Batul
- Geisinger Community Medical Center, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Grace Hughes
- Clinical Trials Unit, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gabriella Leri
- Clinical Trials Unit, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marilee Manganiello
- Clinical Trials Unit, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kaitlyn Mroczka
- Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alicia M Johns
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vernon Mascarenhas
- Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, Dal Forno ARJ, Al-Khatib SM, Arora V, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Cha YM, Chung EH, Cronin EM, Curtis AB, Cygankiewicz I, Dandamudi G, Dubin AM, Ensch DP, Glotzer TV, Gold MR, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, Gorodeski EZ, Gutierrez A, Guzman JC, Huang W, Imrey PB, Indik JH, Karim S, Karpawich PP, Khaykin Y, Kiehl EL, Kron J, Kutyifa V, Link MS, Marine JE, Mullens W, Park SJ, Parkash R, Patete MF, Pathak RK, Perona CA, Rickard J, Schoenfeld MH, Seow SC, Shen WK, Shoda M, Singh JP, Slotwiner DJ, Sridhar ARM, Srivatsa UN, Stecker EC, Tanawuttiwat T, Tang WHW, Tapias CA, Tracy CM, Upadhyay GA, Varma N, Vernooy K, Vijayaraman P, Worsnick SA, Zareba W, Zeitler EP, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Ellenbogen KA, Hua W, Ikeda T, Mackall JA, Mason PK, McLeod CJ, Mela T, Moore JP, Racenet LK. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. J Arrhythm 2023; 39:681-756. [PMID: 37799799 PMCID: PMC10549836 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eugene H Chung
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne M Dubin
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
| | - Douglas P Ensch
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Taya V Glotzer
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
| | - Michael R Gold
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
| | - Zachary D Goldberger
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
| | | | - Eiran Z Gorodeski
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
| | | | | | - Weijian Huang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
| | - Peter B Imrey
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
| | - Julia H Indik
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
| | - Saima Karim
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
| | - Peter P Karpawich
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Yaariv Khaykin
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
| | | | - Jordana Kron
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
| | | | - Mark S Link
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
| | - Joseph E Marine
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
| | - Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Rajeev Kumar Pathak
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Morio Shoda
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Jagmeet P Singh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - David J Slotwiner
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
| | | | - Uma N Srivatsa
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia M Tracy
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
| | | | | | - Kevin Vernooy
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wojciech Zareba
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
| | | | - Nestor Lopez-Cabanillas
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Kenneth A Ellenbogen
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Wei Hua
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Takanori Ikeda
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Judith A Mackall
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Pamela K Mason
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Christopher J McLeod
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Theofanie Mela
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Jeremy P Moore
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| | - Laurel Kay Racenet
- Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
- University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
- Hospital SOS Cárdio Florianópolis Brazil
- Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital New Delhi India
- University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester Rochester Minnesota USA
- University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
- Medical University of Łódź, Łódź Poland
- Virginia Mason Franciscan Health Tacoma Washington USA
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology Palo Alto California USA
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
- Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA
- Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
- McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
- Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center Tucson Arizona USA
- MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan Central Michigan University Detroit Michigan USA
- Southlake Regional Health Center Newmarket Ontario Canada
- Sentara Norfolk Virginia USA
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk Belgium and Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
- QEII Health Sciences Center Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Clinica Corazones Unidos Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital Garran Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Santojanni Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
- National University Hospital Singapore Singapore
- Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences New York New York USA
- University of California Davis Sacramento California USA
- Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
- Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA
- Fundación Cardioinfantil Instituto de Cardiologia Bogotá Colombia
- George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
- University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois USA
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
- Geisinger Health System Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania USA
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center New Hampshire Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, Dal Forno ARJ, Al-Khatib SM, Arora V, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Cha YM, Chung EH, Cronin EM, Curtis AB, Cygankiewicz I, Dandamudi G, Dubin AM, Ensch DP, Glotzer TV, Gold MR, Goldberger ZD, Gopinathannair R, Gorodeski EZ, Gutierrez A, Guzman JC, Huang W, Imrey PB, Indik JH, Karim S, Karpawich PP, Khaykin Y, Kiehl EL, Kron J, Kutyifa V, Link MS, Marine JE, Mullens W, Park SJ, Parkash R, Patete MF, Pathak RK, Perona CA, Rickard J, Schoenfeld MH, Seow SC, Shen WK, Shoda M, Singh JP, Slotwiner DJ, Sridhar ARM, Srivatsa UN, Stecker EC, Tanawuttiwat T, Tang WHW, Tapias CA, Tracy CM, Upadhyay GA, Varma N, Vernooy K, Vijayaraman P, Worsnick SA, Zareba W, Zeitler EP. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:e17-e91. [PMID: 37283271 PMCID: PMC11062890 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 105.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eugene H Chung
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne M Dubin
- Stanford University, Pediatric Cardiology, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Taya V Glotzer
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Michael R Gold
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Zachary D Goldberger
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Eiran Z Gorodeski
- University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Weijian Huang
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Peter B Imrey
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Julia H Indik
- University of Arizona, Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Saima Karim
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Peter P Karpawich
- The Children's Hospital of Michigan, Central Michigan University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Yaariv Khaykin
- Southlake Regional Health Center, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jordana Kron
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | | | - Mark S Link
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Joseph E Marine
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk, Belgium and Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ratika Parkash
- QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Rajeev Kumar Pathak
- Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Morio Shoda
- Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jagmeet P Singh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Slotwiner
- Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia M Tracy
- George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | | - Kevin Vernooy
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gilge JL, Padanilam BJ. Bilateral Bundle Branch Block. Cardiol Clin 2023; 41:393-397. [PMID: 37321689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB) are classic manifestations of bundle branch conduction disorders. However, a third form that is uncommon and underrecognized may exist that has features and pathophysiology of both: bilateral bundle branch block (BBBB). This unusual form of bundle branch block exhibits an RBBB pattern in lead V1 (terminal R wave) and an LBBB pattern in leads I and aVL (absence of S wave). This unique conduction disorder may confer an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. BBBB patients may be a subset of patients that respond well to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasen L Gilge
- St Vincent Hospital, 8333 Naab Road, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA.
| | - Benzy J Padanilam
- St Vincent Hospital, 8333 Naab Road, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilczek J, Jadczyk T, Wojakowski W, Gołba KS. Time-related factors predicting a positive response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8524. [PMID: 37237039 PMCID: PMC10219980 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35174-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to identify time parameters predicting favourable CRT response. A total of 38 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, qualified for CRT implantation, were enrolled in the study. A 15% reduction in indexed end-systolic volume after 6 months was a criterion for a positive response to CRT. We evaluated QRS duration, measured from a standard ECG before and after CRT implantation and obtained from mapping with NOGA XP system (AEMM); and the delay, measured with the implanted device algorithm (DCD) and its change after 6 months (ΔDCD); and selected delay parameters between the left and right ventricles based on AEMM data. A total of 24 patients presented with a positive response to CRT versus 9 non-responders. After CRT implantation, we observed differences between responders and non-responders group in the reduction of QRS duration (31 ms vs. 16 ms), duration of paced QRS (123 ms vs. 142 ms), and the change of ΔDCDMaximum (4.9 ms vs. 0.44 ms) and ΔDCDMean (7.7 ms vs. 0.9 ms). The difference in selected parameters obtained during AEMM in both groups was related to interventricular delay (40.3 ms vs. 18.6 ms). Concerning local activation time and left ventricular activation time, we analysed the delays in individual left ventricular segments. Predominant activation delay of the posterior wall middle segment was associated with a better response to CRT. Some AEMM parameters, paced QRS time of less than 120 ms and reduction of QRS duration greater than 20 ms predict the response to CRT. ΔDCD is associated with favourable electrical and structural remodelling.Clinical trial registration: SUM No. KNW/0022/KB1/17/15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek Wilczek
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
- Electrocardiology Department, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Katowice, Poland.
| | - Tomasz Jadczyk
- Division of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Third Department of Cardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
- Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Group, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Wojciech Wojakowski
- Division of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Third Department of Cardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
| | - Krzysztof S Gołba
- Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Electrocardiology Department, Upper Silesian Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Zuloaga C, Ferrari A. Electrophysiological demonstration of nonselective His-Purkinje system capture with para-Hisian pacing. J Electrocardiol 2023; 79:38-45. [PMID: 36934491 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adverse effects of conventional right ventricular (RV) apical pacing prompted the search for more physiological pacing sites, such as selective and nonselective His bundle pacing (HBP), a variant of nonselective HBP (para-Hisian pacing), and mid-septal pacing. However, knowledge of their true benefit on the physiology of ventricular activation, lead stability, and pacing thresholds is limited. METHODS AND RESULTS We included 152 consecutive patients (mean age 61 ± 24, 63% men) in this retrospective study. Of these, 137 patients with different bradyarrhythmias underwent active fixation lead implantation at the RV apex (n = 54), para-Hisian region (n = 66), or mid interventricular septum (n = 17). Fifteen patients with ventricular preexcitation due to an accessory pathway not undergoing pacing were included as controls. A 12‑lead ECG was recorded in all patients, and cardiac electrical synchrony was assessed using the Synchromax® cross-correlation cardiac synchrony index (CSI). RESULTS QRS duration was prolonged in all pacing sites: from 114 ± 28 to 160 ± 29 (RV apex), from 110 ± 28 to 122 ± 29 (para-Hisian), and from 121 ± 24 to 154 ± 30 (mid interventricular septum). The CSI was significantly improved only in patients undergoing para-Hisian pacing, despite a slight widening of the QRS interval. There was no difference in pacing thresholds and sensed R-wave voltage between pacing sites. Only 1 lead, implanted at the para-Hisian region (1.5%), was dislodged towards the mid septum 48 h after implantation but did not require repositioning. CONCLUSIONS QRS duration was not associated with changes in CSI, meaning that QRS width does not significantly affect electrical synchrony.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio de Zuloaga
- Hospital Nacional Profesor Alejandro Posadas, Ecuador 1449 10ª "B" (CABA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Andrés Ferrari
- Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing Unit, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Av. Ipiranga, Porto Alegre 6690, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vergara C, Stella S, Maines M, Africa PC, Catanzariti D, Demattè C, Centonze M, Nobile F, Quarteroni A, Del Greco M. Computational electrophysiology of the coronary sinus branches based on electro-anatomical mapping for the prediction of the latest activated region. Med Biol Eng Comput 2022; 60:2307-2319. [PMID: 35729476 PMCID: PMC9293833 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02610-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
This work dealt with the assessment of a computational tool to estimate the electrical activation in the left ventricle focusing on the latest electrically activated segment (LEAS) in patients with left bundle branch block and possible myocardial fibrosis. We considered the Eikonal-diffusion equation and to recover the electrical activation maps in the myocardium. The model was calibrated by using activation times acquired in the coronary sinus (CS) branches or in the CS solely with an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We applied our computational tool to ten patients founding an excellent accordance with EAMS measures; in particular, the error for LEAS location was less than 4 mm. We also calibrated our model using only information in the CS, still obtaining an excellent agreement with the measured LEAS. The proposed tool was able to accurately reproduce the electrical activation maps and in particular LEAS location in the CS branches, with an almost real-time computational effort, regardless of the presence of myocardial fibrosis, even when information only at CS was used to calibrate the model. This could be useful in the clinical practice since LEAS is often used as a target site for the left lead placement during CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Vergara
- LABS, Dipartimento Di Chimica, Materiali E Ingegneria Chimica “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico Di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20233 Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Stella
- Dipartimento Di Matematica, MOX, Politecnico Di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20233 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Maines
- Department of Cardiology, S. Maria del Carmine Hospital, corso Verona 4, 38068 Rovereto, TN Italy
| | - Pasquale Claudio Africa
- Dipartimento Di Matematica, MOX, Politecnico Di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20233 Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Catanzariti
- Department of Cardiology, S. Maria del Carmine Hospital, corso Verona 4, 38068 Rovereto, TN Italy
| | - Cristina Demattè
- Department of Cardiology, S. Maria del Carmine Hospital, corso Verona 4, 38068 Rovereto, TN Italy
| | - Maurizio Centonze
- U.O. Di Radiologia Di Borgo-Pergine, Borgo Valsugana Hospital, viale Vicenza 9, 38051 Borgo Valsugana, (TN) Italy
| | - Fabio Nobile
- Institute of Mathematics, CSQI, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Route Cantonale, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alfio Quarteroni
- Dipartimento Di Matematica, MOX, Politecnico Di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20233 Milan, Italy
- Institute of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maurizio Del Greco
- Department of Cardiology, S. Maria del Carmine Hospital, corso Verona 4, 38068 Rovereto, TN Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gowani ZS, Tomashitis B, Vo CN, Field ME, Gold MR. Role of Electrical Delay in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2022; 14:233-241. [PMID: 35715081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, left ventricular (LV) lead position was guided by anatomic criteria of pacing from the lateral wall of the LV. However, large trials showed little effect of LV lead position on outcomes, other than noting worse outcomes with apical positions. Given the poor correlation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes with anatomically guided LV lead placement, focus shifted toward more physiologic predictors such as targeting the areas of delayed mechanical and electrical activation. Measures of left ventricular delay and interventricular delay are strong predictors of CRT response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zain S Gowani
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MS-492, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Brett Tomashitis
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MS-492, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Chau N Vo
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MS-492, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Michael E Field
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MS-492, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Michael R Gold
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MS-492, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fan L, Choy JS, Raissi F, Kassab GS, Lee LC. Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy based on a cardiac electromechanics-perfusion computational model. Comput Biol Med 2022; 141:105050. [PMID: 34823858 PMCID: PMC8810745 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for left bundle branch block (LBBB) resulting in mechanical dyssynchrony. Approximately 1/3 of patients with CRT, however, are non-responders. To understand factors affecting CRT response, an electromechanics-perfusion computational model based on animal-specific left ventricular (LV) geometry and coronary vascular networks located in the septum and LV free wall is developed. The model considers contractility-flow and preload-activation time relationships, and is calibrated to simultaneously match the experimental measurements in terms of the LV pressure, volume waveforms and total coronary flow in the left anterior descending and left circumflex territories from 2 swine models under right atrium and right ventricular pacing. The model is then applied to investigate the responses of CRT indexed by peak LV pressure and (dP/dt)max at multiple pacing sites with different degrees of perfusion in the LV free wall. Without the presence of ischemia, the model predicts that basal-lateral endocardial region is the optimal pacing site that can best improve (dP/dt)max by 20%, and is associated with the shortest activation time. In the presence of ischemia, a non-ischemic region becomes the optimal pacing site when coronary flow in the ischemic region fell below 30% of its original value. Pacing at the ischemic region produces little response at that perfusion level. The optimal pacing site is associated with one that optimizes the LV activation time. These findings suggest that CRT response is affected by both pacing site and coronary perfusion, which may have clinical implication in improving CRT responder rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Fan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - Jenny S Choy
- California Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Farshad Raissi
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Lik Chuan Lee
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Casale M, Mezzetti M, Gigliotti De Fazio M, Caccamo L, Busacca P, Dattilo G. Novel active fixation lead guided by electrical delay can improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2021; 9:146-154. [PMID: 34953050 PMCID: PMC8788056 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for heart failure (HF) recently has shown optimal results by targeting electrically delayed sites in coronary sinus (CS) branches. However this purpose often cannot be reached because of unstable left ventricular (LV) lead position. In current study were assessed the long-term effects of the novel active fixation LV lead in CS, guided by electrical delay (QLV), in patients with HF due to coronary artery disease. METHODS One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients underwent CRT with intraoperative evaluation of QLV in the target position of the LV lead. When the novel active fixation LV lead was available, 98 consecutive patients received it, composing the Fix group. They were compared with 87 patients with a conventional passive fixation lead (No Fix group). The final LV lead position was assessed by fluoroscopy. Clinical response to CRT was assessed within a period of about 3 years: patients experiencing HF rehospitalization and death due to HF were defined as non-responders. RESULTS There were no significant differences between groups in the final position of LV lead in left anterior oblique view (Pearson χ2 = 0.12; P = 0.73). In right anterior oblique view, a basal position was reached more in the Fix group (38%) than in the No Fix group (6.5%) (Pearson χ2 = 23.095; P < 0.001). QLV was significantly greater in the Fix group (122.6 ± 33.2 ms; SE = 3.6) than in the No Fix group (97.5 ± 37.8 ms; SE = 4.9) (t = 4.17; P < 0.001). Rehospitalizations for HF were 37 in the No Fix group and 14 in the Fix group. Deaths due to HF were 49 in the No Fix group and 18 in the Fix group. Survival analysis, assessed by Cox regression, showed that the Fix group had a better outcome both for HF rehospitalizations [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25-0.9; P = 0.023] and death due to HF (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.31-0.97; P = 0.04) in comparison with the No Fix group. Adjustment for baseline characteristics by multivariate analysis showed that an active fixation lead in CS, as a covariate, was still significant both for HF rehospitalizations (HR 0.46; 95% CI = 0.24-0.88; P = 0.019) and for death due to HF (HR 0.5; 95% CI = 0.28-0.9; P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS The novel active fixation LV lead allowed to target sites with greater QLV. Often maximum QLV was documented in basal segments, were stability of conventional passive fixation leads is not enough. Patients receiving it experienced less HF rehospitalizations and less death due to HF. Active fixation lead in CS guided by QLV can improve long-term prognosis in patients with HF due to coronary artery disease undergoing to CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Casale
- ASUR Marche - Area Vasta 1, Operative Unit of ICCU and Cardiology, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Urbino, Italy
| | - Maurizio Mezzetti
- ASUR Marche - Area Vasta 1, Operative Unit of ICCU and Cardiology, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Urbino, Italy
| | - Marianna Gigliotti De Fazio
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Operative Unit of Internal Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Loredana Caccamo
- ASUR Marche - Area Vasta 1, Operative Unit of ICCU and Cardiology, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Urbino, Italy
| | - Paolo Busacca
- ASUR Marche - Area Vasta 1, Operative Unit of ICCU and Cardiology, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Urbino, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dattilo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Operative Unit of Cardiology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fukata M, Yamasaki H, Sai E, Ogawa K, Kuroki K, Igarashi M, Sekiguchi Y, Kimura K, Seo Y, Odashiro K, Akashi K, Nogami A, Aonuma K. Impact of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: Beyond QRS duration and morphology. J Cardiol 2021; 79:365-370. [PMID: 34937673 DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical and electrical restoration by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with adaptive pacing algorithm (aCRT) in heart failure patients with a moderately wide (120-149 ms) QRS has not been fully evaluated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of aCRT compared with conventional biventricular CRT (BiV-CRT) regardless of QRS morphology. METHODS Seventeen consecutive patients with a QRS ≥120 ms, regardless of morphology, underwent CRT device implantation with an aCRT pacing algorithm. Propensity score matched analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of aCRT on the improvement in mechanical and electrical parameters after CRT device implantation using historical controls (HC) from the clinical registry of BiV-CRT (START trial). RESULTS Left ventricular (LV) volume significantly decreased after CRT in all patients in both the aCRT and HC groups. The difference in relative reduction of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) was not significantly different between the 2 arms. QRS shortening after CRT was significantly greater in the aCRT group than in the BiV-CRT group, and the difference was prominent in patients with a moderately wide QRS (120-149 ms). In patients with a moderately wide QRS, the relative reduction in LVESV [39 (29-47)% vs. 2 (-6-20)%, p = 0.04] and proportion of LV volume responders (90% vs. 38%, p = 0.04) were significantly greater in the aCRT group than in the HC group. The proportion of volume responders was not significantly different in patients with a wide QRS (≥150 ms). CONCLUSIONS The aCRT algorithm improved electrical and mechanical parameters in patients with a moderately wide QRS, regardless of QRS morphology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuhiro Fukata
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiro Yamasaki
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Eikou Sai
- Division of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Kojiro Ogawa
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kenji Kuroki
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Miyako Igarashi
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Yukio Sekiguchi
- Department of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Fuchu, Japan
| | | | - Yoshihiro Seo
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keita Odashiro
- Division of Cardiology, Kyusyu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koich Akashi
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Akihiko Nogami
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Aonuma
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gilge JL, Padanilam BJ. Bilateral Bundle Branch Block. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2021; 13:685-689. [PMID: 34689895 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB) are classic manifestations of bundle branch conduction disorders. However, a third form that is uncommon and underrecognized may exist that has features and pathophysiology of both: bilateral bundle branch block (BBBB). This unusual form of bundle branch block exhibits an RBBB pattern in lead V1 (terminal R wave) and an LBBB pattern in leads I and aVL (absence of S wave). This unique conduction disorder may confer an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. BBBB patients may be a subset of patients that respond well to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasen L Gilge
- St Vincent Hospital, 8333 Naab Road, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA.
| | - Benzy J Padanilam
- St Vincent Hospital, 8333 Naab Road, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Butter C, Georgi C, Stockburger M. Optimal CRT Implantation-Where and How To Place the Left-Ventricular Lead? Curr Heart Fail Rep 2021; 18:329-344. [PMID: 34495452 PMCID: PMC8484220 DOI: 10.1007/s11897-021-00528-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) represents a well-established and effective non-pharmaceutical heart failure (HF) treatment in selected patients. Still, a significant number of patients remain CRT non-responders. An optimal placement of the left ventricular (LV) lead appears crucial for the intended hemodynamic and hence clinical improvement. A well-localized target area and tools that help to achieve successful lead implantation seem to be of utmost importance to reach an optimal CRT effect. Recent Findings Recent studies suggest previous multimodal imaging (CT/cMRI/ECG torso) to guide intraprocedural LV lead placement. Relevant benefit compared to empirical lead optimization is still a matter of debate. Technical improvements in leads and algorithms (e.g., multipoint pacing (MPP), adaptive algorithms) promise higher procedural success. Recently emerging alternatives for ventricular synchronization such as conduction system pacing (CSP), LV endocardial pacing, or leadless pacing challenge classical biventricular pacing. Summary This article reviews current strategies for a successful planning, implementation, and validation of the optimal CRT implantation. Pre-implant imaging modalities offer promising assistance for complex cases; empirical lead positioning and intraoperative testing remain the cornerstone in most cases and ensure a successful CRT effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Butter
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Brandenburg, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Georgi
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Brandenburg, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Martin Stockburger
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Havelland Kliniken GmbH, Nauen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marques P, Nunes-Ferreira A, Silvério António P, Aguiar-Ricardo I, Rodrigues T, Badie N, Marcos I, Bernardes A, Pinto FJ, de Sousa J. Clinical impact of MultiPoint pacing in responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 44:1577-1584. [PMID: 34255874 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy demonstrated benefits in heart failure. However, only 60-70% are responders and only 22% are super-responders. MultiPoint pacing (MPP) improves structural remodeling, but data in responder patients is scarce. METHODS A prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of MPP was conducted in patients who were CRT responders after 6 months of bi-ventricular (BiV) therapy. At 6 months, responder patients (LV end-systolic volume [LVESV] reduction ≥15%) were randomized to either continued BiV therapy or to MPP programmed with wide anatomical separation ≥30 mm, and followed until 12 months. Efficacy was determined by 6-12 month changes in LVESV and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Evaluations of super-responder rate (LVESV reduction ≥30%) and quality of life (NYHA, EQ-5D, MLHFQ) were also performed. RESULTS From February 2017 to February 2019, 73 CRTs with Quartet LV leads were implanted (42.9% female, 65.7 ± 10.8 years old, 79.5% dilated cardiomyopathy). At 6 months, 74.2% responded to BiV and were randomized to BiV (n = 25) or MPP (n = 24). MPP versus BiV delivered greater LVESV improvement (8.3% decrease in MPP vs. 10.3% increase in BiV patients, p = .047), greater increase in LVEF (7.7% vs. 1.8%, p = .008), and higher 0-12 month super-responder rate (86.4% vs. 56.0%, p = .027). More MPP vs. BiV patients experienced an improvement in NYHA (84.6% vs. 50.0%, p = .047) and EQ-5D (94.4% vs. 54.0%, p = .006). CONCLUSIONS MPP with wide anatomical spacing in CRT responder patients resulted in improved LV reverse remodeling with higher rates of super-responders, and better quality of life metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Marques
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Afonso Nunes-Ferreira
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Pedro Silvério António
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Inês Aguiar-Ricardo
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Tiago Rodrigues
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Ivo Marcos
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Bernardes
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Fausto J Pinto
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João de Sousa
- Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.,CAML, CCUL, Lisbon School of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zoppo F, Gagno G, Perazza L, Cocciolo A, Mugnai G, Vaccari D, Calzolari V. Electroanatomic voltage mapping for tissue characterization beyond arrhythmia definition: A systematic review. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2021; 44:1432-1448. [PMID: 34096635 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction by means of electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems, allows for the understanding of the mechanism of focal or re-entrant arrhythmic circuits, which can be identified by means of dynamic (activation and propagation) and static (voltage) color-coded maps. However, besides this conventional use, EAM may offer helpful anatomical and functional information for tissue characterisation in several clinical settings. Today, data regarding electromechanical myocardial viability, scar detection in ischaemic and nonischaemic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricle dysplasia (ARVC/D) definition are mostly consolidated, while emerging results are becoming available in contexts such as Brugada syndrome and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) implant procedures. As part of an invasive procedure, EAM has not yet been widely adopted as a stand-alone tool in the diagnostic path. We aim to review the data in the current literature regarding the use of 3D EAM systems beyond the definition of arrhythmia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Zoppo
- Elettrofisiologia, U.O.C. di Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Gorizia, Gorizia, Italy
| | - Giulia Gagno
- Dipartimento di Cardiologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, ed Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Luca Perazza
- Elettrofisiologia, U.O.C. di Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Gorizia, Gorizia, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocciolo
- Elettrofisiologia, U.O.C. di Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Gorizia, Gorizia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Mugnai
- Elettrofisiologia, U.O.C di Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Arzignano, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Diego Vaccari
- Elettrofisiologia, U.O.C di Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Feltre, Belluno, Italy
| | - Vittorio Calzolari
- Elettrofisiologia, U.O.C di Cardiologia, Ospedale Civile Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Singh JP, Berger RD, Doshi RN, Lloyd M, Moore D, Stone J, Daoud EG. Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Implantation Strategy for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020; 6:1171-1181. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
19
|
Maines M, Peruzza F, Zorzi A, Moggio P, Angheben C, Catanzariti D, Coletti M, Pangrazzi C, Del Greco M. Coronary sinus and great cardiac vein electroanatomic mapping predicts the activation delay of the coronary sinus branches. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:2061-2067. [DOI: 10.1111/jce.14609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesco Peruzza
- Department of CardiologySanta Maria del Carmine Hospital Rovereto Italy
| | - Alessandro Zorzi
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public HealthUniversity of Padova Padova Italy
| | - Paolo Moggio
- Department of CardiologySanta Maria del Carmine Hospital Rovereto Italy
| | - Carlo Angheben
- Department of CardiologySanta Maria del Carmine Hospital Rovereto Italy
| | | | - Marco Coletti
- Department of CardiologySanta Maria del Carmine Hospital Rovereto Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Moubarak G, Sebag FA, Socie P, Villejoubert O, Louembe J, Ferchaud V. Interrelationships between interventricular electrical delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:2405-2414. [PMID: 32562444 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In cardiac resynchronization therapy, pacing the left ventricle (LV) at sites of prolonged electrical delay is associated with better outcomes. We sought to characterize the interrelationships between intrinsic, right-ventricular (RV)-paced, and LV-paced interventricular delays. METHODS AND RESULTS The following electrical timings were measured at implantation for all electrodes of the LV quadripolar leads: QLV, interventricular delay in intrinsic rhythm (RVs-LVs), in RV-paced rhythm (RVp-LVs), and in LV-paced rhythm (LVp-RVs). We included 32 patients (78% men, age 72 years, LV ejection fraction 29%, left bundle branch block 84%). QLV and RVs-LVs were correlated (R2 = .72, p < .0001), as were RVs-LVs and RVp-LVs (R2 = .27, p = .002) and RVp-LVs and LVp-RVs (R2 = .60, p < .001). Direction of activation along the four LV lead electrodes was concordant between RVs-LVs and RVp-LVs in only 17 (53%) patients. The latest-activated electrodes in RVs-LVs and RVp-LVs were concordant in 26 (81%) patients, adjacent in 3 (9%) patients, and remote in 3 (9%) patients. Biventricular-paced QRS duration varied by more than 10 ms between the two electrodes in half of the patients with dissimilar latest electrodes. Among the seven echocardiographic nonresponders at 6 months, the programmed electrode was remote from the latest electrode in RVs-LVs in five patients and in RVp-LVs in three patients. CONCLUSION Intrinsic and RV-paced interventricular electrical delays are correlated, but there is substantial heterogeneity between patients. The latest-activated electrode may be different between RVs-LVs and RVp-LVs, and this might have important implications in selecting the optimal LV vector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghassan Moubarak
- Department of Electrophysiology and Pacing, Centre Médico-Chirurgical Ambroise Paré, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - Frédéric A Sebag
- Département de Cardiologie Médicale, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Socie
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier de Chartres, Chartres, France
| | - Olivier Villejoubert
- Département de Cardiologie Médicale, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Jules Louembe
- Department of Cardiology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France
| | - Virginie Ferchaud
- Department of Electrophysiology and Pacing, Centre Médico-Chirurgical Ambroise Paré, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.,Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang J, Wang Y, Yang M, Shao S, Tian Y, Shao X, Fan S, Zhang F, Yang W, Xin W, Tang H, Xu M, Yang L, Wang X, Zhou W. Mechanical contraction to guide CRT left-ventricular lead placement instead of electrical activation in myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction: An experimental study based on non-invasive gated myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive electroanatomic mapping. J Nucl Cardiol 2020; 27:419-430. [PMID: 30972718 PMCID: PMC10961107 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01710-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether the region of the latest electrical activation (LEA) corresponds with the segment of the latest mechanical contraction (LMC) in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the left-ventricular (LV) viable segments with LEA and with LMC after myocardial infarction (MI) and analyze the acute hemodynamic responses (dP/dtmax) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacing at different LV sites. METHODS AND RESULTS Bama suckling pigs (n = 6) were subjected to create MI models. Both gated myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPI) and electroanatomic mapping (EAM) were performed successfully before MI and 4 weeks after MI. LMC was assessed by phase analysis of GMPI, while LEA was evaluated by EAM. The dP/dtmax was measured before CRT and when the CRT LV electrode was implanted in viable segments of LMC, viable segments of lateral wall and scar, respectively. The viable segments of LEA were consistent with the sites of LMC for five in six cases. The dP/dtmax increased significantly compared with that before CRT when the CRT LV electrode was implanted in viable segments of LMC (1103.33 ± 195.76 vs 717.83 ± 80.74 mmHg·s-1, P = .001), which was also significantly higher than in viable segments of lateral wall (751.17 ± 105.62 mmHg·s-1, P = .000) and scar (679.50 ± 60.87 mmHg·s-1, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Non-invasive GMPI may be a better option than invasive EAM for guiding LV electrode implantation for CRT in ICM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianfeng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Yuetao Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China.
| | - Minfu Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100000, China
| | - Shan Shao
- Department of Cardiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Yi Tian
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xiaoliang Shao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Shengdeng Fan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Feifei Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Wenchong Xin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Haipeng Tang
- School of Computing, University of Southern Mississippi, Long Beach, MS, 39560, USA
| | - Min Xu
- Department of Echocardiogram, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Ling Yang
- Department of Cardiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Xiaosong Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Weihua Zhou
- School of Computing, University of Southern Mississippi, Long Beach, MS, 39560, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The QR-max index, a novel electrocardiographic index for the determination of left ventricular conduction delay and selection of cardiac resynchronization in patients with non-left bundle branch block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2019; 58:147-156. [PMID: 31807986 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00671-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) remains an uncertain indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-LBBB includes right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific LV conduction delay (NSCD), two different electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns which are not generally considered to be associated with LV conduction delay as judged by the invasive assessment of the Q-LV interval. We evaluated whether a novel ECG interval (QR-max index) correlated with the degree of LV conduction delay regardless of the type of non-LBBB ECG pattern, and could, therefore, predict CRT response. In 173 non-LBBB patients on CRT (92 NSCD, 81 RBBB), the QR-max index was measured as the maximum interval from QRS onset to R-wave offset in the limb leads. The correlation between QR-max index and Q-LV interval and the impact of the QR-max index on time to first heart failure hospitalization during 3-year follow-up were assessed. Q-LV correlated better with the QR-max index than with QRSd, particularly in the RBBB group (r = 0.91; p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.19; p < 0.089), while the correlations were r = 0.79 (p < 0.01) and r = 0.68 (p < 0.01), respectively, in the NSCD group. In both groups, the QR-max index was significantly more able than QRSd to identify CRT responders (AUC 0.825 vs. 0.576; p = 0.0008 in RBBB; AUC 0.738 vs. 0.701; p = 0.459 in NSCD). A QR-max index exceeding a cutoff value of 120 ms was associated with CRT response, with predictive values of 86.8 and 81.4% in RBBB and NSCD, respectively. The QR-max index reflects the degree of LV electrical delay regardless of QRS duration in RBBB and NSCD patients and is a useful indicator of suitability for CRT in non-LBBB patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Comparison of measures of ventricular delay on cardiac resynchronization therapy response. Heart Rhythm 2019; 17:615-620. [PMID: 31765805 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left ventricular (LV) pacing at sites of prolonged LV delay (QLV) or at long interventricular delay (right ventricle [RV]-LV) is strongly associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. QLV and RV-LV have been independently evaluated, but little is known regarding the interrelationship between these measures or of delay to the RV. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between measures of electrical delay on CRT response in the SMART-AV (SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial. METHODS In 419 patients, QLV and RV-LV were measured. CRT response was defined as a >15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume from implant to 6 months. The correlation between QLV and RV-LV and the clinical variables associated with the difference between QLV and RV-LV (QRV) were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association between these measures on CRT response. A machine learning algorithm was used to construct a classification tree to predict response to CRT. RESULTS The cohort was 66% male (age 66 ± 11 years), 75% had left bundle branch block; and QRS was 150 ± 25 ms. QLV and RV-LV were highly correlated (R2 = 0.71). A longer QRV was observed among patients with right bundle branch block, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and increased QRS. In a multivariable model including QLV, RV-LV, and other known predictors of CRT response, RV-LV, but not QLV, remained associated with CRT response (odds ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.26; P = .017). Combining the 2 measures achieved better prediction of CRT response in the group with intermediate RV-LV. CONCLUSION RV-LV is a better predictor of CRT response than QLV. There is incremental value in using both measurements or QRV in certain subpopulations.
Collapse
|
24
|
Multisite pacing via a quadripolar lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2019; 56:117-125. [PMID: 31321658 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00592-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy is challenging. Up to 40% of patients are non-responder. Multisite pacing via a quadripolar lead, also called multipoint/multipole pacing (MPP), is a debated alternative. In this review, we summarize evidence in the literature, tips and pitfalls related to MPP programming, and the different algorithms of MPP in different manufacturers.
Collapse
|
25
|
Lee AWC, Nguyen UC, Razeghi O, Gould J, Sidhu BS, Sieniewicz B, Behar J, Mafi-Rad M, Plank G, Prinzen FW, Rinaldi CA, Vernooy K, Niederer S. A rule-based method for predicting the electrical activation of the heart with cardiac resynchronization therapy from non-invasive clinical data. Med Image Anal 2019; 57:197-213. [PMID: 31326854 PMCID: PMC6746621 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is one of the few effective treatments for heart failure patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. The pacing location of the left ventricle is indicated as a determinant of CRT outcome. Objective Patient specific computational models allow the activation pattern following CRT implant to be predicted and this may be used to optimize CRT lead placement. Methods In this study, the effects of heterogeneous cardiac substrate (scar, fast endocardial conduction, slow septal conduction, functional block) on accurately predicting the electrical activation of the LV epicardium were tested to determine the minimal detail required to create a rule based model of cardiac electrophysiology. Non-invasive clinical data (CT or CMR images and 12 lead ECG) from eighteen patients from two centers were used to investigate the models. Results Validation with invasive electro-anatomical mapping data identified that computer models with fast endocardial conduction were able to predict the electrical activation with a mean distance errors of 9.2 ± 0.5 mm (CMR data) or (CT data) 7.5 ± 0.7 mm. Conclusion This study identified a simple rule-based fast endocardial conduction model, built using non-invasive clinical data that can be used to rapidly and robustly predict the electrical activation of the heart. Pre-procedural prediction of the latest electrically activating region to identify the optimal LV pacing site could potentially be a useful clinical planning tool for CRT procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A W C Lee
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - U C Nguyen
- Department of Physiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - O Razeghi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Gould
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - B S Sidhu
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - B Sieniewicz
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Behar
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Bart's Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Mafi-Rad
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - G Plank
- Department of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - F W Prinzen
- Department of Physiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C A Rinaldi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Vernooy
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - S Niederer
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Unusual manifestation of left ventricular electrical conduction delay on the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram in a patient with prior myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2019; 55:32-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
27
|
Salden OAE, van den Broek HT, van Everdingen WM, Mohamed Hoesein FAA, Velthuis BK, Doevendans PA, Cramer MJ, Tuinenburg AE, Leufkens P, van Slochteren FJ, Meine M. Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 35:1327-1337. [PMID: 30847659 PMCID: PMC6598949 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01574-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of intra-procedural visualization of optimal pacing sites and image-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In fifteen patients (10 males, 68 ± 11 years, 7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction of 26 ± 5%), optimal pacing sites were identified pre-procedurally using cardiac imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived scar and dyssynchrony maps were created for all patients. In six patients the anatomy of the left phrenic nerve (LPN) and coronary sinus ostium was assessed via a computed tomography (CT) scan. By overlaying the CMR and CT dataset onto live fluoroscopy, aforementioned structures were visualized during LV lead implantation. In the first nine patients, the platform was tested, yet, no real-time image-guidance was implemented. In the last six patients real-time image-guided LV lead placement was successfully executed. CRT implant and fluoroscopy times were similar to previous procedures and all leads were placed close to the target area but away from scarred myocardium and the LPN. Patients that received real-time image-guided LV lead implantation were paced closer to the target area compared to patients that did not receive real-time image-guidance (8 mm [IQR 0–22] vs 26 mm [IQR 17–46], p = 0.04), and displayed marked LV reverse remodeling at 6 months follow up with a mean LVESV change of −30 ± 10% and a mean LVEF improvement of 15 ± 5%. Real-time image-guided LV lead implantation is feasible and may prove useful for achieving the optimal LV lead position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Odette A E Salden
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans T van den Broek
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter M van Everdingen
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Birgitta K Velthuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter A Doevendans
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Hearts Institute, Central Military Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten-Jan Cramer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anton E Tuinenburg
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frebus J van Slochteren
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- CART-Tech B.V, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mathias Meine
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Carpio EF, Gomez JF, Sebastian R, Lopez-Perez A, Castellanos E, Almendral J, Ferrero JM, Trenor B. Optimization of Lead Placement in the Right Ventricle During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. A Simulation Study. Front Physiol 2019; 10:74. [PMID: 30804805 PMCID: PMC6378298 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients suffering from heart failure and left bundle branch block show electrical ventricular dyssynchrony causing an abnormal blood pumping. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended for these patients. Patients with positive therapy response normally present QRS shortening and an increased left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction. However, around one third do not respond favorably. Therefore, optimal location of pacing leads, timing delays between leads and/or choosing related biomarkers is crucial to achieve the best possible degree of ventricular synchrony during CRT application. In this study, computational modeling is used to predict the optimal location and delay of pacing leads to improve CRT response. We use a 3D electrophysiological computational model of the heart and torso to get insight into the changes in the activation patterns obtained when the heart is paced from different regions and for different atrioventricular and interventricular delays. The model represents a heart with left bundle branch block and heart failure, and allows a detailed and accurate analysis of the electrical changes observed simultaneously in the myocardium and in the QRS complex computed in the precordial leads. Computational simulations were performed using a modified version of the O'Hara et al. action potential model, the most recent mathematical model developed for human ventricular electrophysiology. The optimal location for the pacing leads was determined by QRS maximal reduction. Additionally, the influence of Purkinje system on CRT response was assessed and correlation analysis between several parameters of the QRS was made. Simulation results showed that the right ventricle (RV) upper septum near the outflow tract is an alternative location to the RV apical lead. Furthermore, LV endocardial pacing provided better results as compared to epicardial stimulation. Finally, the time to reach the 90% of the QRS area was a good predictor of the instant at which 90% of the ventricular tissue was activated. Thus, the time to reach the 90% of the QRS area is suggested as an additional index to assess CRT effectiveness to improve biventricular synchrony.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edison F Carpio
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Bioengineering (Ci2B), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan F Gomez
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Bioengineering (Ci2B), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael Sebastian
- Computational Multiscale Simulation Lab (CoMMLab), Department of Computer Science, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Lopez-Perez
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Bioengineering (Ci2B), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eduardo Castellanos
- Electrophysiology Laboratory and Arrhythmia Unit, Grupo HM Hospitales, Hospital Monteprincipe, University CEU-San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus Almendral
- Electrophysiology Laboratory and Arrhythmia Unit, Grupo HM Hospitales, Hospital Monteprincipe, University CEU-San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose M Ferrero
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Bioengineering (Ci2B), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Beatriz Trenor
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Bioengineering (Ci2B), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Singh JP, Berger RD, Doshi RN, Lloyd M, Moore D, Daoud EG. Rationale and design for ENHANCE CRT: QLV implant strategy for non-left bundle branch block patients. ESC Heart Fail 2018; 5:1184-1190. [PMID: 30264456 PMCID: PMC6300807 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Historically, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response in non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) patients has been suboptimal in comparison with that observed in left bundle branch block patients. The electrical activation pattern of the left ventricle (LV) is different between these two QRS morphologies. Small non-randomized studies have suggested that targeting the LV wall with greatest electrical delay may be superior to conventional anatomical pacing from the lateral wall in non-LBBB patients. This article outlines the design and rationale of a prospective, randomized, pilot study, which assesses the effect of a non-traditional LV lead implant strategy on the clinical composite score after 12 months of follow-up in a non-LBBB patient population. METHODS All patients will receive an Abbott quadripolar CRT-D system (Quartet 1458Q LV lead with Unify Quadra™, Quadra Assura™ CRT-D or any market-approved CRT-D device with quadripolar pacing capabilities). Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio between a QLV-based implant strategy vs. standard of care. Up to 250 patients will be enrolled in the study. CONCLUSIONS If the primary endpoint is achieved, this study will provide important information about reducing the non-responder rate in non-LBBB patients and provide further evidence for the QLV-based implant strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rahul N Doshi
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Douglas Moore
- St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | -
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Novel approach to discriminate left bundle branch block from nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay using pacing-induced functional left bundle branch block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 53:347-355. [PMID: 30232686 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-018-0449-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Left bundle branch block (LBBB) has a predictive value for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy as reported by Zareba et al. (Circulation 123(10):1061-1072, 2011). However, based on ECG criteria, the discrimination between complete LBBB and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay is challenging. We tested the hypothesis that discrimination can be performed using standard electrophysiological catheters and a simple stimulation protocol. METHODS Fifty-nine patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into groups of narrow QRS (n = 20), wide QRS of right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology (n = 14), and wide QRS of LBBB morphology (n = 25). Using a diagnostic catheter placed in the coronary sinus, left ventricular activation was assessed during intrinsic conduction as well as during right ventricular (RV) stimulation. RESULTS In patients with narrow QRS and RBBB, the Q-LV/QRS ratio was 0.43 ± 0.013 (n = 20) and 0.41 ± 0.026 (n = 14), respectively. In patients with LBBB morphology, the Q-LV/QRS split up into a group of patients with normal (0.43 ± 0.022, n = 7) and a group with delayed left ventricular activation (0.75 ± 0.016, n = 18). By direct comparison of the Q-LV/QRS ratio during intrinsic conduction with the Q-LV/QRS ratio during RV pacing leading to a functional LBBB, a clear distinction between a group of "true LBBB" and another group of "apparent LBBB"/nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) could be generated. CONCLUSIONS We present a novel and practical method that might facilitate discrimination between patients with apparent LBBB and true LBBB by comparing Q-LV/QRS ratios during intrinsic activation and during RV stimulation. Although this method can already be directly applied, validation by 3D electrical mapping and prospective correlation to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response will be required for further translation into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bonomini MP, Ortega DF, Barja LD, Logarzo E, Mangani N, Paolucci A. ECG parameters to predict left ventricular electrical delay. J Electrocardiol 2018; 51:844-850. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
32
|
[Coronary sinus mapping of the optimal LV electrode position]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2018; 29:254-258. [PMID: 30094659 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-018-0585-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established pillar of treatment for patients with chronic heart failure. However, 30% of patients do not respond adequately to this type of therapy. One possible reason for this is a nonoptimal left ventricular stimulation site. This review focuses on possibilities of visualization of the coronary vein anatomy and its role in the determination of the electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony to optimize the therapeutic success of the resynchronization therapy. In addition, the clinical implication and the perspectives of a dedicated mapping of the coronary vein are discussed. Finally, a brief outlook on current and future technologies for improving this form of therapy is given.
Collapse
|
33
|
Sieniewicz BJ, Gould J, Porter B, Sidhu BS, Behar JM, Claridge S, Niederer S, Rinaldi CA. Optimal site selection and image fusion guidance technology to facilitate cardiac resynchronization therapy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2018; 15:555-570. [PMID: 30019954 PMCID: PMC6178093 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1502084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as one of the few effective treatments for heart failure. However, up to 50% of patients derive no benefit. Suboptimal left ventricle (LV) lead position is a potential cause of poor outcomes while targeted lead deployment has been associated with enhanced response rates. Image-fusion guidance systems represent a novel approach to CRT delivery, allowing physicians to both accurately track and target a specific location during LV lead deployment. AREAS COVERED This review will provide a comprehensive evaluation of how to define the optimal pacing site. We will evaluate the evidence for delivering targeted LV stimulation at sites displaying favorable viability or advantageous mechanical or electrical properties. Finally, we will evaluate several emerging image-fusion guidance systems which aim to facilitate optimal site selection during CRT. EXPERT COMMENTARY Targeted LV lead deployment is associated with reductions in morbidity and mortality. Assessment of tissue characterization and electrical latency are critical and can be achieved in a number of ways. Ultimately, the constraints of coronary sinus anatomy have forced the exploration of novel means of delivering CRT including endocardial pacing which hold promise for the future of CRT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J. Sieniewicz
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Gould
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bradley Porter
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Baldeep S Sidhu
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan M Behar
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Claridge
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Niederer
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher A. Rinaldi
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Cardiology Department, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Siciliano M, Migliore F, Badano L, Bertaglia E, Pedrizzetti G, Cavedon S, Zorzi A, Corrado D, Iliceto S, Muraru D. Cardiac resynchronization therapy by multipoint pacing improves response of left ventricular mechanics and fluid dynamics: a three-dimensional and particle image velocimetry echo study. Europace 2018; 19:1833-1840. [PMID: 28025231 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims To characterize the effect of multipoint pacing (MPP) compared to biventricular pacing (BiV) on left ventricle (LV) mechanics and intraventricular fluid dynamics by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) and echocardiographic particle imaging velocimetry (Echo-PIV). Methods and results In 11 consecutive patients [8 men; median age 65 years (57-75)] receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a quadripolar LV lead (Quartet,St.Jude Medical,Inc.), 3DE and Echo-PIV data were collected for each pacing configuration (CRT-OFF, BiV, and MPP) at follow-up after 6 months. 3DE data included LV volumes, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), strain, and systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI). Echo-PIV was used to evaluate the directional distribution of global blood flow momentum, ranging from zero, when flow force is predominantly along the base-apex direction, up to 90° when it becomes transversal. MPP resulted in significant reduction in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes compared with both CRT-OFF (P = 0.02; P = 0.008, respectively) and BiV (P = 0.04; P = 0.03, respectively). LVEF and cardiac output were significant superior in MPP compared with CRT-OFF, but similar between MPP and BiV. Statistical significant differences when comparing global longitudinal and circumferential strain and SDI with MPP vs. CRT-OFF were observed (P = 0.008; P = 0.008; P = 0.01, respectively). There was also a trend towards improvement in strain between BiV and MPP that did not reach statistical significance. MPP reflected into a significant reduction of the deviation of global blood flow momentum compared with both CRT-OFF and BiV (P = 0.002) indicating a systematic increase of longitudinal alignment from the base-apex orientation of the haemodynamic forces. Conclusion These preliminary results suggest that MPP resulted in significant improvement of LV mechanics and fluid dynamics compared with BiV. However, larger studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariachiara Siciliano
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Migliore
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Badano
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Emanuele Bertaglia
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Gianni Pedrizzetti
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, P. Europa 1, 34127 Trieste, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavedon
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zorzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Domenico Corrado
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Sabino Iliceto
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Denisa Muraru
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, Ricciardi D, D'agostino C, Notarstefano P, Ribatti V, Morani G, Mantica M, Di Biase L, Bertaglia E, Calò L, Zanon F. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace 2018; 19:1170-1177. [PMID: 27189954 PMCID: PMC5834139 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims This registry was created to describe the experience of 76 Italian centres with a large cohort of recipients of multipoint pacing (MPP) capable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and results A total of 507 patients in whom these devices had been successfully implanted were enrolled between August 2013 and May 2015. We analysed: (i) current clinical practices for the management of such patients, and (ii) the impact of MPP on heart failure clinical composite response and on the absolute change in ejection fraction (EF) at 6 months. Multipoint pacing was programmed to ‘ON’ in 46% of patients before discharge. Methods of optimizing MPP programming were most commonly based on either the greatest narrowing of the QRS complex (38%) or the electrical delays between the electrodes (34%). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up data were evaluated in 232 patients. These patients were divided into two groups according to whether MPP was programmed to ‘ON’ (n = 94) or ‘OFF’ (n = 138) at the time of discharge. At 6 months, EF was significantly higher in the MPP group than in the biventricular-pacing group (39.1 ± 9.6 vs. 34.7 ± 7.6%; P < 0.001). Even after adjustments, early MPP activation remained an independent predictor of absolute increase in LVEF of ≥5% (odds ratio 2.5; P = 0.001). At 6 months, an improvement in clinical composite score was recorded in a greater proportion of patients with MPP-ON than in controls (56 vs. 38%; P = 0.009). On comparing optimal MPP and conventional vectors, QRS was also seen to have decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Conclusion This study provides information that is essential in order to deal with the expected increase in the number of patients receiving MPP devices in the coming years. The results revealed different practices among centres, and establishing the optimal programming that can maximize the benefit of MPP remains a challenging issue. Compared with conventional CRT, MPP improved clinical status and resulted in an additional increase in EF. Clinical Trial Registration http://www.clinicaltrial.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02606071.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B Forleo
- Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Luca Santini
- Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Potenza
- Ospedale Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, S.Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | | | - Vito Calabrese
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Ribatti
- Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | | | | - Luigi Di Biase
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Montefiore Hospital, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leo M, Webster D, Betts TR. Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of endocardial biventricular pacing using the WiSE CRT system and conventional epicardial biventricular pacing. J Arrhythm 2018; 34:87-89. [PMID: 29721121 PMCID: PMC5828267 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing with the WiSE CRT system has recently become available as alternative to conventional epicardial CRT pacing. We report the first comparison of the acute electrical and hemodynamic response produced by the two CRT pacing modalities in a patient undergoing WiSE CRT implant after a failed conventional CRT procedure. WiSE CRT pacing showed an additive acute benefit compared with conventional CRT. These findings could potentially translate into long-term clinical benefit and introduce the potential for tri-ventricular pacing using both systems simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Leo
- John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK
| | - David Webster
- John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK
| | - Tim R Betts
- John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zanon F, Marcantoni L, Baracca E, Pastore G, Giau G, Rigatelli G, Lanza D, Picariello C, Aggio S, Giatti S, Zuin M, Roncon L, Pacetta D, Noventa F, Prinzen FW. Hemodynamic comparison of different multisites and multipoint pacing strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapies. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2018; 53:31-39. [PMID: 29627954 PMCID: PMC6153901 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-018-0362-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to increase the responder rate to CRT, stimulation of the left ventricular (LV) from multiple sites has been suggested as a promising alternative to standard biventricular pacing (BIV). The aim of the study was to compare, in a group of candidates for CRT, the effects of different pacing configurations-BIV, triple ventricular (TRIV) by means of two LV leads, multipoint (MPP), and multipoint plus a second LV lead (MPP + TRIV) pacing-on both hemodynamics and QRS duration. METHODS Fifteen patients (13 male) with permanent AF (mean age 76 ± 7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 7%; 7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy; mean QRS duration 178 ± 25 ms) were selected as candidates for CRT. Two LV leads were positioned in two different branches of the coronary sinus. Acute hemodynamic response was evaluated by means of a RADI pressure wire as the variation in LVdp/dtmax. RESULTS Per patient, 2.7 ± 0.7 veins and 5.2 ± 1.9 pacing sites were evaluated. From baseline values of 998 ± 186 mmHg/s, BIV, TRIV, MPP, and MPP-TRIV pacing increased LVdp/dtmax to 1200 ± 281 mmHg/s, 1226 ± 284 mmHg/s, 1274 ± 303 mmHg, and 1289 ± 298 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed significantly higher values during all pacing configurations in comparison with the baseline; moreover, higher values were recorded during MPP and MPP + TRIV than at the baseline or during BIV and also during MPP + TRIV than during TRIV. Mean QRS width decreased from 178 ± 25 ms at the baseline to 171 ± 21, 167 ± 20, 168 ± 20, and 164 ± 15 ms, during BIV, TRIV, MPP, and MPP-TRIV, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with AF, the acute response to CRT improves as the size of the early activated LV region increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Zanon
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy. .,Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy.
| | - Lina Marcantoni
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.,Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Enrico Baracca
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.,Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Gianni Pastore
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.,Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Giau
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.,Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rigatelli
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy.,Interventional Cardiology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Daniela Lanza
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Claudio Picariello
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Silvio Aggio
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Sara Giatti
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Marco Zuin
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Loris Roncon
- Cardiology Department, Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital, 140, Viale Tre Martiri, 45100, Rovigo, Italy
| | | | - Franco Noventa
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Frits W Prinzen
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lee AWC, Costa CM, Strocchi M, Rinaldi CA, Niederer SA. Computational Modeling for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2018; 11:92-108. [PMID: 29327314 PMCID: PMC5908824 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-017-9779-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with an electrical substrate pathology causing ventricular dyssynchrony. However 40-50% of patients do not respond to treatment. Cardiac modeling of the electrophysiology, electromechanics, and hemodynamics of the heart has been used to study mechanisms behind HF pathology and CRT response. Recently, multi-scale dyssynchronous HF models have been used to study optimal device settings and optimal lead locations, investigate the underlying cardiac pathophysiology, as well as investigate emerging technologies proposed to treat cardiac dyssynchrony. However the breadth of patient and experimental data required to create and parameterize these models and the computational resources required currently limits the use of these models to small patient numbers. In the future, once these technical challenges are overcome, biophysically based models of the heart have the potential to become a clinical tool to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela W C Lee
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Marina Strocchi
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Steven A Niederer
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
van Everdingen WM, Zweerink A, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, Nguyên UC, van Rossum AC, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K, Allaart CP, Meine M. Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2018; 11:e005912. [DOI: 10.1161/circep.117.005912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter M. van Everdingen
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Alwin Zweerink
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Maarten J. Cramer
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Pieter A. Doevendans
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Uyên Châu Nguyên
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Albert C. van Rossum
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Frits W. Prinzen
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Cornelis P. Allaart
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| | - Mathias Meine
- From the Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands (W.M.v.E., M.J.C., P.A.D., M.M.); Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (A.Z., A.C.v.R., C.P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (U.C.N., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, CARIM (Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (U.C.N., F.W.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rials SJ, Pershing M, Collins C. Guidewire Method for Measuring Local Left Ventricular Electrical Activation Time During Cardiac Resynchronization Implantation. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2018; 9:2989-2995. [PMID: 32477783 PMCID: PMC7252739 DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The timing of local activation at left ventricular (LV) pacing leads is measured from the onset of the QRS complex to the peak of the LV electrogram (QLV). Pacing from the sites of late activation is associated with higher response rates to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Prior studies have measured QLV from permanent pacing leads, or have used electroanatomic mapping systems. The current study compares QLV measurements made with a guidewire to those collected from permanent LV pacing leads positioned at the same venous site without the use of electroanatomic mapping systems. In this study, 20 patients undergoing CRT implantation (14 males, mean QRS: 164.0 ms) had QLV measurements taken using a guidewire. QLV and LV electrogram duration measurements were made at LV pacing sites, and were repeated after positioning the permanent LV pacing lead at the same site. There was no difference in QLV measurements obtained using a guidewire and those obtained using the permanent pacing lead placed at the same site (p = 0.569). QLV measurements obtained with a guidewire and the permanent LV pacing lead at the same site, respectively, were strongly correlated (r = 0.965; p < 0.001). The median absolute difference in electrogram duration was 7.0 ms (p = 0.55). The average time required to make QLV measurements using the guidewire was 11.7 minutes [standard deviation (SD): 6.8]. The average total fluoroscopy time for the entire CRT implant procedure was 10.9 minutes (SD: 5.1). In light of these results, it can be suggested that a guidewire can be used to prospectively measure LV prior to selection or placement of a permanent pacing lead without the use of an electroanatomic mapping system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth J Rials
- OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Division of Cardiology, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Multipoint Left Ventricular Lead Pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2017; 3:1519-1522. [PMID: 29759833 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 10/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
42
|
The role of interventricular conduction delay to predict clinical response with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14:1748-1755. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
43
|
Oddone D, Solari D, Nangah R, Arena G, Mureddu R, Giorgi D, Sitta N, Bottoni N, Senatore G, Giaccardi M, Giammaria M, Themistoclakis S, Laffi M, Cipolla E, Di Lorenzo F, Carpi R, Brignole M. Optimization of coronary sinus lead placement targeted to the longest right-to-left delay in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Optimal Pacing SITE 2 (OPSITE 2) acute study and protocol. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2017; 40:1350-1357. [DOI: 10.1111/pace.13212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
44
|
Chrysohoou C, Dilaveris P, Antoniou CK, Skiadas I, Konstantinou K, Gatzoulis K, Kallikazaros I, Tousoulis D. Heart failure study of multipoint pacing effects on ventriculoarterial coupling: Rationale and design of the HUMVEE trial. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2017; 23:e12510. [PMID: 29034563 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for symptomatic heart failure (HF). Unfortunately, many recipients remain nonresponders. Studies have revealed the potential role of multipoint pacing (MPP) in improving response and outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of MPP against those of standard biventricular pacing (BVP) on (i) ventriculoarterial coupling (VAC) and energy efficiency of the failing heart, (ii) diastolic function, (iii) quality of life, and (iv) NT-proBNP levels and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during a follow-up of 13 months. HUMVEE is a single-center, prospective, observational, crossover cohort study. Seventy-six patients with BVP indication will be implanted with a system able to deliver both pacing modes. BVP will be activated at implantation and optimized 1 month after. At 6 months postoptimization MPP will be activated and optimized. Optimization will be performed based on stroke volume maximization, as assessed by ultrasound. Laboratory measurements (GFR and NT-proBNP) and echocardiographic studies (VAC calculation, strain rate, diastolic function) will be performed at implantation, 6 months post-BVP optimization and at the end of 13 months of follow-up (6 months post-MPP optimization). Potential reduction in arrhythmogenesis by MPP will also be assessed. MPP is a pacing modality with the potential to improve HF patients' outcomes. The HUMVEE trial will attempt to associate any potential added beneficial effects of MPP over standard BVP with alterations in VAC and energy efficiency of the heart, thus uncovering a novel mechanistic link between MPP and improved outcomes in HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Chrysohoou
- First University Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Ioannis Skiadas
- State Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Dimitrios Tousoulis
- First University Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pluijmert M, Bovendeerd PHM, Lumens J, Vernooy K, Prinzen FW, Delhaas T. New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response. Europace 2017; 18:iv94-iv103. [PMID: 28011836 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) produces clinical benefits in chronic heart failure patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB). The position of the pacing site on the left ventricle (LV) is considered an important determinant of CRT response, but the mechanism how the LV pacing site determines CRT response is not completely understood. The objective of this study is to investigate the relation between LV pacing site during biventricular (BiV) pacing and cardiac function. METHODS AND RESULTS We used a finite element model of BiV electromechanics. Cardiac function, assessed as LV dp/dtmax and stroke work, was evaluated during normal electrical activation, typical LBBB, fascicular blocks and BiV pacing with different LV pacing sites. The model replicated clinical observations such as increase of LV dp/dtmax and stroke work, and the disappearance of a septal flash during BiV pacing. The largest hemodynamic response was achieved when BiV pacing led to best resynchronization of LV electrical activation but this did not coincide with reduction in total BiV activation time (∼ QRS duration). Maximum response was achieved when pacing the mid-basal lateral wall and this was close to the latest activated region during intrinsic activation in the typical LBBB, but not in the fascicular block simulations. CONCLUSIONS In these model simulations, the best cardiac function was obtained when pacing the mid-basal LV lateral wall, because of fastest recruitment of LV activation. This study illustrates how computer modeling can shed new light on optimizing pacing therapies for CRT. The results from this study may help to design new clinical studies to further investigate the importance of the pacing site for CRT response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Pluijmert
- Maastricht University, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joost Lumens
- Maastricht University, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frits W Prinzen
- Maastricht University, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T Delhaas
- Maastricht University, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bertaglia E, Migliore F, Baritussio A, De Simone A, Reggiani A, Pecora D, D'Onofrio A, Rapacciuolo A, Savarese G, Pierantozzi A, Marenna B, Ruffa F, Campari M, Malacrida M, Stabile G. Stricter criteria for left bundle branch block diagnosis do not improve response to CRT. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2017; 40:850-856. [PMID: 28543265 DOI: 10.1111/pace.13104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 04/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has proved to be effective in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Recently, new electrocardiography criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of LBBB. These criteria are stricter than the current American Heart Association (AHA) criteria. We assessed the rate of echocardiographic response to CRT in patients with traditional LBBB versus patients who met the new criteria (strict LBBB). METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing CRT were enrolled in the CRT MORE registry. Patients with no-LBBB QRS morphology according to AHA criteria, atrial fibrillation, right bundle branch block, and right ventricular pacing were excluded. Strict LBBB was defined as: QRS ≥ 140 ms for men and ≥130 ms for women, QS or rS in V1-V2, mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥2 contiguous leads. Patients showing a relative decrease of ≥15% in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 12 months were defined as responders. RESULTS Among 335 patients with LBBB, 131 (39%) had strict LBBB. Patients with and without strict LBBB showed comparable baseline characteristics, except for QRS duration (166 ± 20 ms vs 152 ± 25 ms, P < 0.001). On 12-month evaluation, 205 patients (61%) were responders; 85 of 131 (65%) had strict LBBB and 120 of 204 (59%) had traditional LBBB (P = 0.267). On multivariate analysis, a history of atrial fibrillation, larger LVESV, and the presence of mid-QRS notching in ≥1 lead (odds ratio 2.099; 95% confidence interval 1.061-4.152, P = 0.033) were independently associated with echocardiographic response. CONCLUSION Stricter definition of LBBB did not improve response to CRT in comparison to the current AHA definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Bertaglia
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Migliore
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Anna Baritussio
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonio Rapacciuolo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chatterjee NA, Gold MR, Waggoner AD, Picard MH, Stein KM, Yu Y, Meyer TE, Wold N, Ellenbogen KA, Singh JP. Longer Left Ventricular Electric Delay Reduces Mitral Regurgitation After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Mechanistic Insights From the SMART-AV Study (SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2017; 9:CIRCEP.116.004346. [PMID: 27906653 DOI: 10.1161/circep.116.004346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with worse survival in those undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) lead position in CRT may ameliorate mechanisms of MR. We examine the association between a longer LV electric delay (QLV) at the LV stimulation site and MR reduction after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS QLV was assessed retrospectively in 426 patients enrolled in the SMART-AV study (SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in CRT). QLV was defined as the time from QRS onset to the first large peak of the LV electrogram. Linear regression and logistic regression were used to assess the association between baseline QLV and MR reduction at 6 months (absolute change in vena contracta width and odds of ≥1 grade reduction in MR). At baseline, there was no difference in MR grade, LV dyssynchrony, or LV volumes in those with QLV above versus below the median (95 ms). After multivariable adjustment, increasing QLV was an independent predictor of MR reduction at 6 months as reflected by an increased odds of MR response (odds ratio: 1.13 [1.03-1.25]/10 ms increase QLV; P=0.02) and a decrease in vena contracta width (P<0.001). At 3 months, longer QLV (≥median) was associated with significant decrease in LV end-systolic volume (ΔLV end-systolic volume -28.2±38.9 versus -4.9±33.8 mL, P<0.001). Adjustment for 3-month ΔLV end-systolic volume attenuated the association between QLV and 6-month MR reduction. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing CRT, longer QLV was an independent predictor of MR reduction at 6 months and associated with interval 3-month LV reverse remodeling. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for using an electric-targeting LV lead strategy at the time of CRT implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yinghong Yu
- For the author affiliations, please see the Appendix
| | | | - Nicholas Wold
- For the author affiliations, please see the Appendix
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Koç M, Kaypakli O, Gözübüyük G, Yıldıray Şahin D. Coronary sinus lead delay index for optimization of coronary sinus lead placement. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2017; 23. [PMID: 28557338 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Optimization of coronary sinus (CS) lead position to the latest activated left ventricular (LV) area is important to increase cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. We aimed to detect the relationship between coronary sinus lead delay index (CSDI) and echocardiographic, electrocardiographic response to CRT treatment. METHODS We prospectively included 137 consecutive patients with heart failure (HF) diagnosis, QRS ≥ 120 ms, left bundle branch block (LBBB), New York Heart Association score (NYHA) II-IV, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% and scheduled for CRT (84 male, 53 female; mean age 65.1 ± 10.1 years). Echocardiographic CRT response was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). CS lead sensing delay was calculated as the time interval from the onset of surface QRS wave to the onset of depolarization wave recorded from the CS lead by using the CS pacing lead as a bipolar electrode. CSDI was calculated by dividing the CS lead sensing delay by the QRS duration. RESULTS LVESV reduction was associated with baseline QRS width (r = .257, p = .002), QRS narrowing (r = .396, p < .001), CSDI (r = .357, p < .001), and NT-proBNP (r = -0.213, p = .022) in bivariate analysis. In logistic regression analysis, CSDI was found to be only independent parameter for predicting significant LVESV reduction (Beta = 0.318, p < .001). CSDI was also found to be significantly associated with LVEF increase (r = .244, p = .004) and QRS narrowing (r = .178, p = .046). CONCLUSION CSDI may be used as a marker to predict the favorable response to CRT. It may be useful to integrate CSDI to CRT implantation procedure in order to minimize nonresponders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mevlüt Koç
- Department of Cardiology, Adana Health Practices and Research Center, Health Sciences University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Onur Kaypakli
- Department of Cardiology, Adana Health Practices and Research Center, Health Sciences University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Gözübüyük
- Department of Cardiology, Adana Health Practices and Research Center, Health Sciences University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Durmus Yıldıray Şahin
- Department of Cardiology, Adana Health Practices and Research Center, Health Sciences University, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
LEE ANGELAWC, CROZIER ANDREW, HYDE EOINR, LAMATA PABLO, TRUONG MICHAEL, SOHAL MANAV, JACKSON THOMAS, BEHAR JONATHANM, CLARIDGE SIMON, SHETTY ANOOP, SAMMUT EVA, PLANK GERNOT, RINALDI CHRISTOPHERALDO, NIEDERER STEVEN. Biophysical Modeling to Determine the Optimization of Left Ventricular Pacing Site and AV/VV Delays in the Acute and Chronic Phase of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2017; 28:208-215. [PMID: 27885749 PMCID: PMC5535003 DOI: 10.1111/jce.13134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Revised: 11/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac anatomy and function adapt in response to chronic cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The effects of these changes on the optimal left ventricle (LV) lead location and timing delay settings have yet to be fully explored. OBJECTIVE To predict the effects of chronic CRT on the optimal LV lead location and device timing settings over time. METHODS Biophysical computational cardiac models were generated for 3 patients, immediately post-implant (ACUTE) and after at least 6 months of CRT (CHRONIC). Optimal LV pacing area and device settings were predicted by pacing the ACUTE and CHRONIC models across the LV epicardium (49 sites each) with a range of 9 pacing settings and simulating the acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of the heart. RESULTS There were statistically significant differences between the distribution of the AHR in the ACUTE and CHRONIC models (P < 0.0005 in all cases). The site delivering the maximal AHR shifted location between the ACUTE and CHRONIC models but provided a negligible improvement (<2%). The majority of the acute optimal LV pacing regions (76-100%) and device settings (76-91%) remained optimal chronically. CONCLUSION Optimization of the LV pacing location and device settings were important at the time of implant, with a reduced benefit over time, where the majority of the acute optimal LV pacing region and device settings remained optimal with chronic CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ANGELA W. C. LEE
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - ANDREW CROZIER
- Institute of BiophysicsMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - EOIN R. HYDE
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - PABLO LAMATA
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - MICHAEL TRUONG
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - MANAV SOHAL
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - THOMAS JACKSON
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - JONATHAN M. BEHAR
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - SIMON CLARIDGE
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - ANOOP SHETTY
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - EVA SAMMUT
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - GERNOT PLANK
- Institute of BiophysicsMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - CHRISTOPHER ALDO RINALDI
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Cardiovascular DepartmentGuy's and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - STEVEN NIEDERER
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical EngineeringKing's College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
DEL GRECO MAURIZIO, MAINES MASSIMILIANO, MARINI MASSIMILIANO, COLELLA ANDREA, ZECCHIN MASSIMO, VITALI-SERDOZ LAURA, BLANDINO ALESSANDRO, BARBONAGLIA LORELLA, ALLOCCA GIUSEPPE, MUREDDU ROBERTO, MARENNA BIONDINO, ROSSI PAOLO, VACCARI DIEGO, CHIANCA ROBERTO, INDIANI STEFANO, DI MATTEO IRENE, ANGHEBEN CARLO, ZORZI ALESSANDRO. Three-Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping System-Enhanced Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation: Results From a Multicenter Registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016; 28:85-93. [DOI: 10.1111/jce.13120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 09/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - ALESSANDRO ZORZI
- Santa Maria del Carmine Hospital; Rovereto Italy
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences; University of Padova; Padova Italy
| |
Collapse
|