End Points for Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

Pre-ablation and Post-ablation Factors Influencing the Prognosis of Patients with Electrical Storm Treated by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: An Update

Catheter ablation-based management strategies for the drug-refractory electrical storm (ES) have been proven to abolish acute ventricular arrhythmic episodes and improve long-term outcomes. However, this effect is highly influenced by multiple independently acting factors, which, if identified and addressed, may allow a more tailored management to each particular case to improve results. This review synthesizes existing evidence concerning ES outcome predictors of patients undergoing ablation and introduces the role of novel scoring algorithms to refine risk stratification. The presence of these factors should be assessed during two distinct phases in relation to the ablation procedure: before (based on preprocedural multimodal evaluation of the patient's structural heart disease and comorbidities) and after the ablation procedure (in terms of information derived from the invasive substrate characterization, procedural results, postprocedural recurrences (spontaneous or during non-invasive testing), and complications).

Prognostic value of non-invasive programmed ventricular stimulation after VT ablation to predict VT recurrences

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of (non)-invasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS) to predict recurrences of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is under discussion. Optimal endpoints of VT ablation are not well defined, and optimal timepoint of NIPS is unknown. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of programmed ventricular stimulation at the end of the VT ablation procedure (PVS) and NIPS after VT ablation to identify patients at high risk for VT recurrence.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and February 2022, consecutive patients with VT and structural heart disease undergoing first VT ablation and consecutive NIPS were included. In total, 138 patients were included. All patients underwent NIPS through their implanted ICDs after a median of 3 (1-5) days after ablation (at least 2 drive cycle lengths (500 and 400 ms) and up to four right ventricular extrastimuli until refractoriness). Clinical VT was defined by comparison with 12-lead electrocardiograms and stored ICD electrograms from spontaneous VT episodes. Patients were followed for a median of 37 (13-61) months.

RESULTS

Of the 138 patients, 104 were non-inducible (75%), 27 were inducible for non-clinical VTs (20%), and 7 for clinical VT (5%). In 107 patients (78%), concordant results of PVS and NIPS were observed. After 37 ± 20 months, the recurrence rate for any ventricular arrhythmia was 40% (normal NIPS 29% vs. inducible VT during NIPS 66%; log-rank p = 0.001) and for clinical VT was 3% (normal NIPS 1% vs. inducible VT during NIPS 9%; log-rank p = 0.045). Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of NIPS were higher compared to PVS (PPV: 65% vs. 46% and NPV: 68% vs. 61%). NIPS revealed the highest NPV among patients with ICM and LVEF > 35%. Patients with inducible VT during NIPS had the highest VT recurrences and overall mortality. Patients with both negative PVS and NIPS had the lowest any VT recurrence rates with 32%. Early re-ablation of patients with recurrent VTs during index hospitalization was feasible but did not reveal better long-term VT-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients after VT ablation and structural heart disease, NIPS is superior to post-ablation PVS to stratify the risk of VT recurrences. The PPV and NPV of NIPS at day 3 were superior compared to PVS at the end of the procedure to predict recurrent VT, especially in patients with ICM.

Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation: Retrospective Analysis and Prospective Outlooks-A Comprehensive Review

Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia associated with an overall high morbi-mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Despite their pivotal role in preventing sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, although a guideline-based class I recommendation, are unable to prevent arrhythmic episodes and significantly alter the quality of life by delivering recurrent therapies. From open-heart surgical ablation to the currently widely used percutaneous approach, catheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure able to target the responsible re-entry myocardial circuit from both the endocardium and the epicardium. There are four main mapping strategies, activation, entrainment, pace, and substrate mapping, each of them with their own advantages and limitations. The contemporary guideline-based recommendations for VT ablation primarily apply to patients experiencing antiarrhythmic drug ineffectiveness or those intolerant to the pharmacological treatment. Although highly effective in most cases of scar-related VTs, the traditional approach may sometimes be insufficient, especially in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies, where circuits may be unmappable using the classic techniques. Alternative methods have been proposed, such as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation or radiotherapy ablation, surgical ablation, needle ablation, transarterial coronary ethanol ablation, and retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation, with promising results. Further studies are needed in order to prove the overall efficacy of these methods in comparison to standard radiofrequency delivery. Nevertheless, as the field of cardiac electrophysiology continues to evolve, it is important to acknowledge the role of artificial intelligence in both the pre-procedural planning and the intervention itself.

Guiding ablation strategies for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease by analyzing links and conversion patterns of traceable abnormal late potential zone

BACKGROUND

Substrate-based ablation can treat uninducible or hemodynamically instability scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, whether a correlation exists between the critical VT isthmus and late activation zone (LAZ) during sinus rhythm (SR) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the structural and functional properties of abnormal substrates and analyze the link between the VT circuit and abnormal activity during SR.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with scar-related VT (age, 50.0 ± 13.7 years and 86.1% men) who underwent VT ablation were reviewed. The automatic rhythmia ultrahigh resolution mapping system was used for electroanatomic substrate mapping. The clinical characteristics and mapping findings, particularly the LAZ characteristics during SR and VT, were analyzed. To determine the association between the LAZ during the SR and VT circuits, the LAZ was defined as five activation patterns: entrance, exit, core, blind alley, and conduction barrier.

RESULTS

Forty-five VTs were induced in 36 patients, 91.1% of which were monomorphic. The LAZ of all patients was mapped during the SR and VT circuits, and the consistency of the anatomical locations of the LAZ and VT circuits was analyzed. Using the ultrahigh resolution mapping system, interconversion patterns, including the bridge, T, puzzle, maze, and multilayer types, were identified. VT ablation enabled precise ablation of abnormal late potential conduction channels.

CONCLUSION

Five interconversion patterns of the LAZ during the SR and VT circuits were summarized. These findings may help formulate more precise substrate-based ablation strategies for scar-related VT and shorter procedure times.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: strategies to improve outcomes

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias has evolved considerably since it was first described more than 3 decades ago. Advancements in understanding the underlying substrate, utilizing pre-procedural imaging, and evolving ablation techniques have improved the outcomes of catheter ablation. Ensuring safety and efficacy during catheter ablation requires adequate planning, including analysis of the 12 lead ECG and appropriate pre-procedural imaging. Defining the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate and disease eitology allow for the developed of tailored ablation strategies, especially for patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. During ablation, the type of anesthesia can affect VT induction, the quality of the electro-anatomic map, and the stability of the catheter during ablation. For high risk patients, appropriate selection of hemodynamic support can increase the success of VT ablation. For patients in whom VT is hemodynamically unstable or difficult to induce, substrate modification strategies can aid in safe and successful ablation. Recently, there has been an several advancements in substrate mapping strategies that can be used to identify and differentiate local late potentials. The incorporation of high-definition mapping and contact-sense technologies have both had incremental benefits on the success of ablation procedures. It is crucial to harness newer technology and ablation strategies with the highest level of peri-procedural safety to achieve optimal long-term outcomes in patients undergoing VT ablation.

Contemporary approach to catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) comprises a heterogenous group of disorders with myocardial dysfunction unrelated to significant coronary disease. As the use of implantable defibrillators has increased in this patient population, catheter ablation is being utilized more frequently to treat NICM patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Progress has been made in identifying multiple subtypes of NICM with variable scar patterns. The distribution of scar is often mid-myocardial and subepicardial, and identifying and ablating this substrate can be challenging. Here, we will review the current understanding of NICM subtypes and the outcomes of VT ablation in this population. We will discuss the use of cardiac imaging, electrocardiography, and electroanatomic mapping to define the VT substrate and the ablation techniques required to successfully prevent VT recurrence.

Combination of High-Density and Coherent Mapping for Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Structural Heart Disease

The present study describes our experience with a new mapping approach for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for recurrent VA were analyzed. High-density mapping was conducted in all patients. In patients with inducible VA, local activation time (LAT) mapping and a novel vector-based mapping algorithm were implemented to analyze arrhythmia propagation. In case of focal tachycardia, the location of earliest activation was targeted. In VAs with re-entrant mechanisms, zones of slow conduction based on coherent mapping were ablated. Substrate modification was performed when pathologic electrograms were identified. Seventy-four patients were included. Sixty-five patients (87.8%) were male. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the underlying disease in 35 patients (47.3%) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy was the underlying disease in 39 patients (52.7%). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.8 ± 9.9%. Non-inducibility of any VA was achieved in 70 patients (94.6%). Termination of VA was achieved in 93.5% of patients with stable VA. In 4 patients (5.4%), partial success was achieved. VA (p < 0.001), ATP (p < 0.001) and shock burden (p = 0.001) were significantly reduced after ablation. Mean arrhythmia-free survival after 12 months was 85.1 ± 4.7%. High-density mapping in combination with coherent mapping may facilitate the understanding of the tachycardia mechanism, providing targets for effective ablation.

Spectral characterisation of ventricular intracardiac potentials in human post-ischaemic bipolar electrograms

Abnormal ventricular potentials (AVPs) are frequently referred to as high-frequency deflections in intracardiac electrograms (EGMs). However, no scientific study performed a deep spectral characterisation of AVPs and physiological potentials in real bipolar intracardiac recordings across the entire frequency range imposed by their sampling frequency. In this work, the power contributions of post-ischaemic physiological potentials and AVPs, along with some spectral features, were evaluated in the frequency domain and then statistically compared to highlight specific spectral signatures for these signals. To this end, 450 bipolar EGMs from seven patients affected by post-ischaemic ventricular tachycardia were retrospectively annotated by an experienced cardiologist. Given the high variability of the morphologies observed, three different sub-classes of AVPs and two sub-categories of post-ischaemic physiological potentials were considered. All signals were acquired by the CARTO® 3 system during substrate-guided catheter ablation procedures. Our findings indicated that the main frequency contributions of physiological and pathological post-ischaemic EGMs are found below 320 Hz. Statistical analyses showed that, when biases due to the signal amplitude influence are eliminated, not only physiological potentials show greater contributions below 20 Hz whereas AVPs demonstrate higher spectral contributions above ~ 40 Hz, but several finer differences may be observed between the different AVP types.

Swiss National Registry on Catheter Ablation Procedures: Changing Trends over the Last 20 Years

The Swiss Ablation Registry provides a national database for electrophysiologic studies and catheter ablations. We analyzed the database to provide an in-depth look at changing trends over the last 20 years. During the study period a total of 78622 catheter ablations (age 61.0 ± 1.2 years; 63.7% male) were performed in 29 centers. The number of ablations increased by approximately ten-fold in 20 years. Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) was the main driver behind this increase, with more than hundred-fold (39.7% of all ablations in 2019). Atrioventricular-nodal-reentrant-tachycardia (AVNRT) and accessory pathways, being the main indications for ablation in 2000 (44.1%/25.1%, respectively), made up of only a small proportion (15.2%/3.5%,) respectively in 2019. Fluoroscopy, ablation, and procedure durations were reduced for all ablations over time. The highest repeat ablations were performed for ventricular tachycardia and AF (24.4%/24.3%). The majority of ablations (63.0%) are currently performed in private hospitals and non-university public hospitals whereas university hospitals had dominated (82.4%) at the turn of the century. A pronounced increase in the number of catheter ablations in Switzerland was accompanied by a marked decrease in fluoroscopy, ablation, and procedure durations. We observed a shift toward more complex procedures in older patients with comorbidities.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a framework for approaching ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of cardiomyopathy, outline the latest evidence-based recommendations for catheter ablation and device therapy, and discuss novel treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in systolic heart failure has evolved, with an increasing role for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to identify underlying substrate and scar burden. Medical therapy for heart failure has greatly improved, and the role of primary prevention defibrillators in nonischemic cardiomyopathy has become more ambiguous. Catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for arrhythmia control and should be considered early, particularly for premature ventricular complex mediated cardiomyopathy. Novel technologies to deliver energy to previously inaccessible sites include high-impedance catheter irrigants, multicatheter bipolar ablation, specialized catheters with extendable needles, transcoronary ethanol infusion, and stereotactic body radiation therapy.

SUMMARY

Assessment and management of ventricular arrhythmias in systolic heart failure requires a systematic, multimodality approach aimed at identifying the underlying cause and reversible causes, optimizing medical therapy, assessing need for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and considering catheter ablation. Further research will focus on prevention of disease progression, improved risk stratification, and ablation technologies that minimize procedure duration and enable delivery of durable lesions.

Clinical, procedural and long-term outcome of ischemic VT ablation in patients with previous anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction

Background

Outcome of ischemic VT ablation may differ between patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) in relation to infarct localization.

Methods

We analyzed procedural data, acute and long-term outcomes of 152 consecutive patients (139 men, mean age 67 ± 9 years) with previous anterior or inferior MI who underwent ischemic VT ablation at our institution between January 2010 and October 2015.

Results

More patients had a history of inferior MI (58%). Mean ejection fraction was significantly lower in anterior MI patients (28 ± 10% vs. 34 ± 10%, p < 0.001). NYHA class and presence of comorbidities were not different between the groups. Indication for the procedure was electrical storm in 43% of patients, and frequent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies in 57%, and did not differ significantly between anterior and inferior MI patients. A mean of 3 ± 2 VT morphologies were inducible, with a trend towards more VT in the anterior MI group (3.1 ± 2.2 vs. 2.6 ± 1.9, p = 0.18). Procedural parameters and acute success did not differ between the groups. During a mean follow-up of 3 ± 2 years, more anterior MI patients had undergone a re-ablation (49% vs. 33%, p = 0.09, Chi-square test). There was a trend towards more ICD shocks in patients with previous anterior MI (46% vs. 34%). After adjusting for risk factors and ejection fraction, multivariable Cox regression analyses showed no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.78) and cardiovascular mortality between infarct localizations (p = 0.6).

Conclusion

Clinical characteristics of patients with anterior and inferior MI are similar except for ejection fraction. Patients with inferior MI appear to have better outcome regarding survival, ICD shocks and re-ablation, but this appears to be related to better ejection fraction when compared with anterior MI.

Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease

Patients with structural heart disease (SHD) are at risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT), which can be difficult to manage clinically. Many treatment options are currently available, but no single approach can be applied with 100% perfect results; often, a combination of therapies is required to achieve good control of ventricular arrhythmias. Coronary artery disease with previous myocardial infarction (MI) is the most common form of SHD presenting with VT, with scar-mediated reentry being the predominant mechanism. Other cardiomyopathies such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and repaired congenital heart disease can also present in conjunction with ventricular arrhythmias. A thorough analysis of the patient’s history, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and imaging findings are essential for understanding the mechanism and guiding localization of the site of origin of the arrhythmia and the presence of underlying heart disease, which will improve outcomes following catheter ablation if such is indicated. Separately, antiarrhythmic drugs have not been shown to decrease mortality in this patient population but can help to reduce the VT burden and subsequently the need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Unfortunately, most antiarrhythmic agents are negative inotropes, with the possibility of worsening heart failure. This review aims to discuss the current options available for the management of VT in SHD.

Clinical characteristics of patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias after sacubitril/valsartan initiation

Our aim was to describe the clinical profile of patients presenting sustained ventricular arrhythmias after sacubitril/valsartan (SV) initiation. All cases of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving SV were consecutively recorded in two centers. Nineteen patients had sustained ventricular arrhythmias after SV. All were men and were previously receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin II receptor blockers before SV initiation. Fifteen patients (78.9%) had electrical stability in the previous 6 months. Nine patients (47.4%) initiated SV at the lowest available dose (24/26 mg). Globally, in all but five patients alive at discharge, SV was discontinued after the event. Six patients presented new arrhythmic events after discontinuation of SV. Two deaths and three heart transplants occurred (one due to heart failure and the other two due to persistent ventricular arrhythmias). All patients had a high arrhythmic risk, and 17 (89.5%) had an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. No specific triggers for the arrhythmic event were found. Male sex and previous episodes of ventricular arrhythmias could be associated with an increased risk of sustained ventricular tachycardia after SV initiation. Discontinuation of the drug might be an additional approach to enable a better control of ventricular arrhythmias in some patients.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Noninvasive Programmed Ventricular Stimulation-Guided Management Following Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the impact of repeat catheter ablation (CA) prior to hospital discharge based on inducibility of clinical ventricular tachycardia (VT) during noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation (NIPS).

BACKGROUND

Inducibility of clinical VT during NIPS performed several days after CA identifies patients at high risk of recurrence. The impact of NIPS-guided repeat CA has not been reported.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing CA of VT followed by NIPS were studied. Clinical VT was defined by comparison with 12-lead electrocardiograms and stored implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms from spontaneous VT episodes. Among those with inducible clinical VT at NIPS, VT-free survival was compared between those in whom ablation was repeated (group 1) versus those in whom ablation was not repeated (group 2) prior to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Among 469 patients (64 ± 12 years of age; 85% males; 60% ischemic), 216 patients (46%) underwent NIPS 3 days (interquartile range: 2 to 4 days) after CA. Clinical VT was induced in 45 patients (21%). Among those 45, CA was repeated in 11 patients (24%). There were no significant differences in baseline clinical or index CA characteristics between groups 1 and 2. Over a median 36-month follow-up, only 1 patient (9%) in group 1 experienced VT recurrence compared to 24 patients (71%) in group 2 (p < 0.01). In univariate Cox regression, repeat CA guided by NIPS (hazard ratio: 0.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.01 to 0.58; p = 0.01) was the only predictor of VT-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with inducible clinical VT during post-ablation NIPS, repeat CA was associated with significantly lower risk of subsequent recurrence.

Long-term outcome of catheter ablation in post-infarction recurrent ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

Severe LV dysfunction and advanced age are associated with VT recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with post-infarction drug-refractory VT. We present retrospective analysis of long-term outcome after single and repeat VT ablation procedures in patients with ischemic heart disease.

DESIGN

Patients with recurrent VT post infarction who underwent catheter ablation between 2006 and 2017 in Isala Heart Centre were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify predictors of arrhythmia recurrence post ablation. Patients were allocated to subgroups based on LVEF: severe (<30%), moderate (30-40%) and mild LV dysfunction (41-51%) and analyzed with log rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included. Two years VT free survival after a single procedure was 56.6% with median follow-up 46 [17-78] months. Recurrence of VT postablation wash high among patients with an old anteroseptal MI and LVEF < 30% with multiple morphologies of inducible VTs, indicating an extensive and complex substrate. Patients who underwent repeat ablations (27.1%) had significant more often LV aneurysms (20.5% vs. 7.6%, p = .03) and electrical storms (38.5% vs. 21.9%, p = .04). VT free survival was higher in patients with LVEF 41-51% compared to LVEF < 30% (71.4% vs. 47.8%, p = .01). In multivariate analysis, LVEF < 30% (vs 41-51%) was an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR = 2.16, CI 1.15-4.06, p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ischemic VT, success rate of ablation was highest among patients with preserved LV function and recurrent VT and ES was highest among patients with severe LV dysfunction after single and multiple ablation procedures.

The use of a high-resolution mapping system may facilitate standard clinical practice in VE and VT ablation

BACKGROUND

First experiences using a 64-electrode mini-basket catheter (BC) paired with an automatic mapping system (Rhythmia™) for catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular ectopy (VE) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate (1) differences in ventricular access for the BC and (2) benefit of this technology in the setting of standard clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients (pts) undergoing CA for VE or VT using the Intellamap Orion™ paired with the Rhythmia™ automated-mapping system were included in this study. For LV access, transseptal and retrograde access were compared.

RESULTS

All 32 pts (29 men, age 63 ± 15 years) underwent CA for VE (17 pts) or VT (15 pts). For mapping of VE originating from the left ventricle (LV) in 10 out of 13 pts, a transaortic access was feasible. The predominant access for CA of VT was transaortic (5/7). Feasibility and safety seem to be equal. The total procedure time was 179.1 ± 21.2 min for VE ablation and 212.0 ± 71.7 min for VT ablation (p = 0.177). For VE, an acquisition of 1602 ± 1672 map points and annotation of 140 ± 98 automated mapping points sufficed to abolish VE in all pts. During a 6-month follow-up (FU) after CA for VE, a VE burden reduction from 18.5 ± 2.1% to 2.8 ± 2.2% (p = 0.019) was achieved. In VT pts, one patient showed recurrence of sustained VT episodes during FU.

CONCLUSION

Use of a high-resolution mapping system for VE/VT CA potentially facilitates revelation of VE origin and VT circuits in the setting of standard clinical practice. Feasibility and safety of a venous, transaortic, transseptal, or a combined approach seem to be equal.

Role of contact force in ischemic scar-related ventricular tachycardia ablation; optimal force required and impact of left ventricular access route

BACKGROUND

Contact force-sensing technology has become a widely used addition to catheter ablation procedures. Neither the optimal contact force required to achieve adequate lesion formation in the ventricle, nor the impact of left ventricular access route on contact force has been fully clarified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 24) with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia were included in the study. All ablations (n = 25) were performed using irrigated contact force-sensing catheters (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster). Effective lesion formation was defined as electrical unexcitability post ablation at sites which were electrically excitable prior to ablation (unipolar pacing at 10 mA, 2 ms pulse width). We explored the contact force which achieved effective lesion formation and the impact of left ventricular access route (retrograde aortic or transseptal) on the contact force achieved in various segments of the left ventricle. Scar zone was defined as bipolar signal amplitude < 0.5 mV.

RESULTS

Among 427 ablation points, effective lesion formation was achieved at 201 points (47.1%). Contact force did not predict effective lesion formation in the overall group. However, within the scar zone, mean contact force ≥ 10 g was significantly associated with effective lesion formation [OR 3.21 (1.43, 7.19) P = 0.005]. In the 12-segment model of the left ventricle, the retrograde approach was associated with higher median contact force in the apical anterior segment (31 vs 19 g; P = 0.045) while transseptal approach had higher median force in the basal inferior segment (25 vs 15 g; P = 0.021). In the 4-segment model, the retrograde approach had higher force in the anterior wall (28 vs 16 g; P = 0.004) while the transseptal approach had higher force in the lateral wall (21 vs 18 g; P = 0.032). There was a trend towards higher force in the inferior wall with the transseptal approach, but this was not statistically significant (20 vs 15 g; P = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a mean contact force of 10 g or more within the scar zone had the best correlation with electrical unexcitability post ablation in our study. The retrograde aortic approach was associated with better contact force over the anterior wall while use of a transseptal approach had better contact force over the lateral wall.

High-Density Mapping in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A PentaRay® Study

Background

High-density mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT) with PentaRay^® (Biosense-Webster) provides high resolution with discrimination of local abnormal electrograms and slow conducting channels. We evaluate the feasibility of PentaRay^® to characterize the anatomical substrate and assume an influence of the outcome despite limitations.

Methods

Over a 24-month period, 26 endocardial and four epicardial maps were obtained of 26 VT patients (18 ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, 69.2%) and 8 non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM, 30.8%), age 65 ± 9 years). Catheter ablation (CA) was performed with the aim of transecting the isthmus. The endpoint was non-inducibility of any VT. Manual review of the maps was performed and focused on evaluating scarring, bipolar electrograms, and procedure times.

Results

In 55.6 ± 34.4 min, 1,085.9 ± 726.2 points were created. The mean ablation time was 50.8 ± 30.1 min. The endpoint was achieved in 12 patients (46.2%). The mean dense scar area and the mean patchy scar area were 49.4 ± 51.8 cm² (range 0 - 190 cm²) and 14.7 ± 14.9 cm² (range 0 - 110 cm²), respectively. Analyzing the learning curve, we found a tendency in decreasing procedure times. During the course of follow-up treatment averaging a 14-month period, device interrogation showed that 17 patients (65.4%) had remained free of any arrhythmia recurrence.

Conclusion

The high-density maps with PentaRay^® were safely created in a short period of time. Our manual review of the maps reveals limitations of current annotation criteria; nevertheless, medium-term outcomes were encouraging. Further prospective studies are required to validate our findings in a larger cohort of patients.

Treatment of persistent ventricular tachycardia: Drugs or ablation?

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the mortality risk associated with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and can frequently terminate VT episodes painlessly, but do not prevent recurrent episodes. For patients with symptomatic recurrences, frequent asymptomatic recurrences, ICD shocks, or VT storm, most clinicians recommend strategies to suppress VT. The proarrhythmic mortality risk of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) may be mitigated by the presence of an ICD, but these medications are limited by high recurrence rates, and unfavorable side effect profiles. Catheter ablation is an alternative or adjunctive option, but is also limited by incomplete efficacy and procedural risk.

Limitations and Challenges in Mapping Ventricular Tachycardia: New Technologies and Future Directions

Recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease are associated with increased mortality and morbidity, despite the life-saving benefits of implantable cardiac defibrillators. Reducing implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies is important, as recurrent shocks can cause increased myocardial damage and stunning, despite the conversion of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Catheter ablation has emerged as a potential therapeutic option either for primary or secondary prevention of these arrhythmias, particularly in post-myocardial infarction cases where the substrate is well defined. However, the outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease remain unsatisfactory in comparison with other electrophysiological procedures. The disappointing efficacy of ventricular tachycardia ablation in structural heart disease is multifactorial. In this review, we discuss the issues surrounding this and examine the limitations of current mapping approaches, as well as newer technologies that might help address them.

Ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: evidence, techniques, results, and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes current understanding of the arrhythmia substrate and effect of catheter ablation for infarct-related ventricular tachycardia, focusing on recent findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies support the use of catheter ablation earlier in the course of ischemic disease with moderate success in reducing arrhythmia recurrence and shocks from implantable defibrillators, although mortality remains unchanged. Ablation can be lifesaving for patients presenting with electrical storm. Advanced mapping systems with image integration facilitate identification of potential substrate, and several different approaches to manage hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia have emerged. Novel ablation techniques that allow deeper lesion formation are in development.

SUMMARY

Catheter ablation is an important therapeutic option for preventing or reducing episodes of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Present technologies allow successful ablation in the majority of patients, even when the arrhythmia is hemodynamically unstable. Failure of the procedure is often because of anatomic challenges that will hopefully be addressed with technological progress.

Therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease: a multifaceted challenge

The unpredictable nature and potentially catastrophic consequences of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) have obligated physicians to search for therapies to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). At present, a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been used as a risk factor to predict SCD in patients with structural heart disease and has been consistently adopted as the predominant, and sometimes sole, indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Although the ICD remains the mainstay life-saving therapy for SCD, it does not modify the underlying arrhythmic substrate and may be associated with adverse effects from perioperative and long-term complications. Preventative pharmacological therapy has been associated with limited benefits, but anti-arrhythmic medications have significant side effects profiles. Catheter ablation of VAs has greatly evolved over the last few decades. Substrate mapping in sinus rhythm has allowed haemodynamically unstable VAs to be successfully treated. Both LVEF as an indication for ICD therapy and electro-anatomical mapping for substrate modification identify static components of underlying myocardial arrhythmogenicity. They do not take into account dynamic factors, such as the mechanisms of arrhythmia initiation and development of new anatomical or functional lines of block, leading to the initiation and maintenance of VAs. Dynamic factors are difficult to evaluate and consequently are not routinely used in clinical practice to guide treatment. However, progress in the treatment of VAs should consider and integrate dynamic factors with static components to fully characterize the myocardial arrhythmic substrate.

Substrate mapping for unstable ventricular tachycardia

The primary goal of catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) is the interruption of critical areas of slow conduction responsible for the development and maintenance of the reentrant VT circuit. Most patients with scar-related VT present with unstable arrhythmias that are not amenable to interrogation from multiple sites to define the VT circuit based on the intracardiac activation sequence and the response to entrainment mapping. In order to effectively target unstable VTs, a number of ablation approaches have been described with the aim of targeting the abnormal substrate defined with mapping in sinus or paced rhythm. Some of these strategies (eg, late potential and local abnormal ventricular activity ablation or scar homogenization) target the entire abnormal substrate harboring abnormal electrograms, defined with a variety of different criteria. Scar dechanneling, linear ablation through sites matching VT with pacing, and the core isolation approach focus on more discrete regions within the abnormal substrate that have been proven relevant to the clinical and/or inducible arrhythmias by means of physiologic maneuvers, although this does not necessarily translate to fewer radiofrequency lesions to achieve the procedural end-point. Observational studies evaluating different substrate-based ablation techniques have reported fairly uniform arrhythmia-free survivals at short- and mid-term follow-up, although direct comparisons between different techniques are lacking. In this article, we summarize the different state-of-the-art substrate mapping and ablation approaches for targeting unstable VT, with a particular focus on the relative merits and limitations of the described techniques.

Impact of Electrode Type on Mapping of Scar-Related VT

BACKGROUND

Substrate-based VT ablation is mostly based on maps acquired with ablation catheters. We hypothesized that multipolar mapping catheters are more effective for identification of scar and local abnormal ventricular activity (LAVA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Phase1: In a sheep infarction model (2 months postinfarction), substrate mapping and LAVA tagging (CARTO^® 3) was performed, using a Navistar (NAV) versus a PentaRay (PR) catheter (Biosense Webster). Phase2: Consecutive VT ablation patients from a single center underwent NAV versus PR mapping. Point pairs were defined as a PR and a NAV point located within a 3D-distance of ≤3 mm. Agreement was defined as both points in a pair being manually tagged as normal or LAVA. Four sheep (4 years, 50 ± 4.8 kg) and 9 patients were included (53 ± 14 years, 8 male, 6 ischemic cardiomyopathy). Mapping density was higher within the scar with PR versus NAV (3.2 vs. 0.7 points/cm² , P = 0.001) with larger bipolar scar area (68 ± 55 cm² vs. 58 ± 48 cm² , P = 0.001). In total, 818 point pairs were analyzed. Using PR, far-field voltages were smaller (PR vs. NAV; bipolar: 1.43 ± 1.84 mV vs. 1.64 ± 2.04 mV, P = 0.001; unipolar; 4.28 ± 3.02 mV vs. 4.59 ± 3.67 mV, P < 0.001). More LAVA were also detected with PR (PR vs. NAV; 126 ± 113 vs. 36 ± 29, P = 0.001). When agreement on LAVA was reached (overall: 72%; both LAVA, 40%; both normal, 82%) higher LAVA voltages were recorded on PR (0.48 ± 0.33 mV vs. 0.31 ± 0.21 mV, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Multipolar mapping catheters with small electrodes provide more accurate and higher density maps, with a higher sensitivity to near-field signals. Agreement between PR and NAV is low.