Cardiac evaluation of pediatric relatives in sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: a 2-center experience

Autopsy of all young sudden death cases is important to increase survival in family members left behind

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is an important public health problem worldwide, accounting for an estimated 6-20% of total mortality. A significant proportion of SCD is caused by inherited heart disease, especially among the young. An autopsy is crucial to establish a diagnosis of inherited heart disease, allowing for subsequent identification of family members who require cardiac evaluation. Autopsy of cases of unexplained sudden death in the young is recommended by both the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. Overall autopsy rates, however, have been declining in many countries across the globe, and there is a lack of skilled trained pathologists able to carry out full autopsies. Recent studies show that not all cases of sudden death in the young are autopsied, likely due to financial, administrative, and organizational limitations as well as awareness among police, legal authorities, and physicians. Consequently, diagnoses of inherited heart disease are likely missed, along with the opportunity for treatment and prevention among surviving relatives. This article reviews the evidence for the role of autopsy in sudden death, how the cardiologist should interpret the autopsy-record, and how this can be integrated and implemented in clinical practice. Finally, we identify areas for future research along with potential for healthcare reform aimed at increasing autopsy awareness and ultimately reducing mortality from SCD.

The Utility of Sodium Channel Provocation in Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Survivors and Electrocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Fibrillation Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The implications of a drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern following sodium channel blocker provocation (SCBP) are not fully understood.

METHODS

Baseline clinical and ECG data were obtained from consecutive unexplained cardiac arrest survivors undergoing SCBP at 3 centers. A further 15 SCBP positive (SCBP+) unexplained cardiac arrest survivors were recruited from 3 additional centers to explore ventricular fibrillation recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 121 consecutive unexplained cardiac arrest survivors underwent SCBP. The yield of the drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern was 17%. A baseline type 2/3 Brugada pattern (T2/3BP) (adjusted odds ratio, 19.36 [2.74-136.61]; P=0.003) and PR interval (odds ratio, 1.03 [1.01-1.05] per ms; P=0.017) were independent predictors of SCBP+ response. A pathogenic SCN5A variant was identified in 36% of the SCBP+ group versus 0% in the SCBP- group (P<0.001). Amongst SCBP+ patients, a spontaneous type 1 Brugada pattern was identified in 19% during follow up and in 24% a type 1 Brugada pattern was identified in a relative. Prior syncope (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.83 [1.36-10.78]; P=0.011) and the presence of global early repolarization (hazard ratio, 7.91 [3.22-19.44]; P<0.001) were independent predictors of 5-year ventricular fibrillation recurrence. There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater 5-year ventricular fibrillation recurrence in the SCBP- group (23/95 [24%] versus 3/34 [9%]; P=0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

The yield of the drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in consecutive unexplained cardiac arrest survivors undergoing SCBP is 17%. A baseline T2/3BP and PR interval were independent predictors of the drug-induced type 1 Brugada ECG pattern. Greater heritability of BrS phenotype in this group was evidenced by a greater prevalence of pathogenic SCN5A variants and relatives with a type 1 Brugada pattern. A history of prior syncope and the presence of global early repolarization were independent predictors of ventricular fibrillation recurrence.

Postmortem Genetic Testing Is an Increasingly Utilized Tool in Death Investigation

Introduction

Postmortem genetic testing (PMGT) can provide valuable information about an individual's cause of death and potentially allow at-risk relatives to discern their risks for inherited cardiac disease. Postmortem genetic testing is most often successful with certain specimens.

Methods

Investigators collected data on postmortem referrals to GeneDx, LLC for PMGT. Orders were reviewed and stratified based on provider, specimen type, and tests ordered.

Discussion

This cohort included 601 deceased individuals referred for PMGT with a total of 673 genetic tests ordered from 247 different providers. The most common test categories ordered were arrhythmia (33.4%) and cardiomyopathy (29.3%). A likely pathogenic or pathogenic genetic variant was identified in approximately 15% of patients. Blood in EDTA was received for 21.6% of patients with a 95% success rate for completion of all test components. Blood samples in EDTA were most successful in completing PMGT, but sequencing was still successful in the majority of suboptimal specimens.

Conclusion

The use of PMGT is increasing. Obtaining optimal samples (blood in EDTA) is important for successful completion of genetic testing. Obstacles may still exist for obtaining and storing ideal specimens. Continued efforts are needed for education and awareness around appropriate specimen types, storage and shipping of specimens, DNA banking, and overall availability of PMGT. In addition, access to resources such as supplies, proper storage conditions, DNA banking, and PMGT will allow for more opportunities to complete testing.

Brugada Syndrome

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an "inherited" condition characterized by predisposition to syncope and cardiac arrest, predominantly during sleep. The prevalence is ∼1:2,000, and is more commonly diagnosed in young to middle-aged males, although patient sex does not appear to impact prognosis. Despite the perception of BrS being an inherited arrhythmia syndrome, most cases are not associated with a single causative gene variant. Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings support variable extent of depolarization and repolarization changes, with coved ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm and a negative T-wave in the right precordial leads. These ECG changes are often intermittent, and may be provoked by fever or sodium channel blocker challenge. Growing evidence from cardiac imaging, epicardial ablation, and pathology studies suggests the presence of an epicardial arrhythmic substrate within the right ventricular outflow tract. Risk stratification aims to identify those who are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death, with well-established factors being the presence of spontaneous ECG changes and a history of cardiac arrest or cardiogenic syncope. Current management involves conservative measures in asymptomatic patients, including fever management and drug avoidance. Symptomatic patients typically undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion, with quinidine and epicardial ablation used for patients with recurrent arrhythmia. This review summarizes our current understanding of BrS and provides clinicians with a practical approach to diagnosis and management.

Sudden unexplained death versus nonautopsied possible sudden cardiac death: Findings in relatives

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend work-up of relatives to autopsy negative sudden cardiac death victims, denoted as sudden unexplained death (SUD) and nonautopsied possible sudden cardiac death (pSCD) victims. This study assesses and compare baseline characteristics and clinical outcome at initial evaluation and during follow-up of relatives to SUD and pSCD victims.

METHODS

We retrospectively included data from systematic screening and routine follow-up of first-degree relatives to SUD and pSCD victims referred to our Unit for Inherited Cardiac Diseases, Copenhagen, 2005-2018. Victims with an antemortem known inherited cardiac disease were excluded.

RESULTS

We included 371 first-degree relatives from 187 families (120 SUD, 67 pSCD): 276 SUD relatives (age 33 ± 18 years, 54% men) and 95 pSCD relatives (age 40 ± 15 years, 51% men). The diagnostic yields of inherited cardiac diseases in SUD and pSCD families were 16% and 13%, respectively (p = .8). The diagnoses in SUD families were mainly channelopathies (68%), whereas pSCD families were equally diagnosed with cardiomyopathies, channelopathies, and premature ischemic heart disease. Ninety-three percent of diagnosed families were diagnosed at initial evaluation and 7% during follow-up (5.4 ± 3.3 years). During follow-up 34% of relatives with a diagnosed inherited cardiac disease had an arrhythmic event, compared to 5% of relatives without established diagnosis (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Channelopathies dominated in SUD families whereas a broader spectrum of inherited diseases was diagnosed in pSCD families. Most affected relatives were diagnosed at initial evaluation. The event rate was low in relatives without an established diagnosis. Long-term clinical follow-up may not be warranted in all relatives with normal baseline-findings.

Diagnosis, family screening, and treatment of inherited arrhythmogenic diseases in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association Survey

The spectrum of inherited arrhythmogenic diseases (IADs) includes disorders without overt structural abnormalities (i.e. primary inherited arrhythmia syndromes) and structural heart diseases (i.e. arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to evaluate current clinical practice and adherence to 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines regarding the management of patients with IADs. A 24-item centre-based online questionnaire was presented to the EHRA Research Network Centres and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Genetics Focus Group members. There were 46 responses from 20 different countries. The survey revealed that 37% of centres did not have any dedicated unit focusing on patients with IADs. Provocative drug challenges were widely used to rule-out Brugada syndrome (BrS) (91% of centres), while they were used in a minority of centres during the diagnostic assessment of long-QT syndrome (11%), early repolarization syndrome (12%), or catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (18%). While all centres advised family clinical screening with electrocardiograms for all first-degree family members of patients with IADs, genetic testing was advised in family members of probands with positive genetic testing by 33% of centres. Sudden cardiac death risk stratification was straightforward and in line with current guidelines for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, while it was controversial for other diseases (i.e. BrS). Finally, indications for ventricular mapping and ablation procedures in BrS were variable and not in agreement with current guidelines in up to 54% of centres.

Diagnostic yield in victims of sudden cardiac death and their relatives

AIMS

International guidelines recommend cardiogenetic screening in families with sudden cardiac death (SCD) if the suspected cause is an inherited cardiac disease. The aim was to assess the diagnostic yield of inherited cardiac diseases in consecutively referred SCD families.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this single-centre retrospective study, we consecutively included families referred to our tertiary unit between 2005 and 2018 for screening due to SCD. Following evaluation of premortem medical records and postmortem findings for the proband, the families underwent a guideline-based screening protocol. Relatives were followed and cardiovascular events registered. In total, 304 families with 695 relatives were included. In probands, mean age at death was 39 years (75% males) and in relatives mean age at screening was 35 years (47% males). The proband-diagnosis was established through autopsy findings (n = 89), genetic analyses (n = 7), or based on premortem findings (n = 21). In the remaining 187 families with borderline/no diagnosis in the proband, screening of relatives yielded a diagnosis in 26 additional families. In total, an inherited cardiac disease was identified in 143 out of 304 families (47%). In relatives, 73 (11%) were diagnosed. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (n = 16) was the most common diagnosis. During follow-up (mean 5.5 years), a low rate of serious cardiac events was observed (no SCD events).

CONCLUSION

Forty-seven percent of SCD families were diagnosed. Eleven percent of the screened relatives received a definite diagnosis and were offered treatment according to guidelines. A low rate of serious cardiovascular events was observed among SCD relatives.

Cardiac Evaluation of Children With a Family History of Sudden Death

BACKGROUND

After sudden death occurs in the young, first-degree family members should undergo clinical screening for occult cardiac disease, but the diagnostic yield from screening is not well-defined in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical predictors of cardiac diagnosis in children referred for evaluation following a sudden death in the family.

METHODS

Patients referred for a family history of sudden death were evaluated in a retrospective review from a tertiary pediatric referral center.

RESULTS

Among 419 pediatric relatives of 256 decedents, 27% of patients were diagnosed with a disease or had a clinical finding of uncertain significance. Patients were diagnosed with heritable cardiac disease in 39 cases (9.3%). Nonheritable cardiac disease was diagnosed in another 5.5% of patients. Clinical findings of uncertain significance were present in 52 patients (12.4%), including abnormal electrophysiological test results (41 of 52) or imaging test results (11 of 52). Among patients diagnosed with a heritable cardiac disease, the nearest affected relative was almost always a first-degree relative (37 of 39, 95%). The strongest predictors for a successful diagnosis in the patient were an abnormal electrocardiogram and a first-degree relationship to the nearest affected relative (odds ratios: 24.2 and 18.8, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Children referred for a family history of sudden death receive cardiac disease diagnoses (14%), but clinical findings of uncertain significance increase the challenge of clinical management. The importance of a diagnosis in first-degree affected relatives supports the clinical practice of testing intervening family members first when patients are second- or higher-degree relatives to the decedent.

Evaluation After Sudden Death in the Young

Sudden cardiac death is defined as a death occurring usually within an hour of onset of symptoms, arising from an underlying cardiac disease. Sudden cardiac death is a complication of a number of cardiovascular diseases and is often unexpected. In individuals aged <35 years, unexplained sudden cardiac death is the most common presentation. A significant proportion of sudden cardiac death in the young (≤35 years) events may be precipitated by underlying inherited cardiac conditions, including both heritable cardiomyopathies and inherited arrhythmia syndromes (also known as cardiac channelopathies). Tragically, sudden death may be the first manifestation of the disease in a family and, therefore, clinical and genetic evaluation of surviving family members forms a key role in diagnosing the underlying inherited cardiac condition in the family. This is particularly relevant when considering that most inherited cardiac conditions are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner meaning that surviving family members have a 50% chance of inheriting the same disease substrate. This review will outline the underlying causes of sudden cardiac death in the young and outline our universal approach to familial evaluation following a young person’s sudden death.

The Diagnostic Yield of Brugada Syndrome After Sudden Death With Normal Autopsy

BACKGROUND

Familial evaluation after a sudden death with negative autopsy (sudden arrhythmic death syndrome; SADS) may identify relatives at risk of fatal arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the impact of systematic ajmaline provocation testing using high right precordial leads (RPLs) on the diagnostic yield of Brugada syndrome (BrS) in a large cohort of SADS families.

METHODS

Three hundred three SADS families (911 relatives) underwent evaluation with resting electrocardiogram using conventional and high RPLs, echocardiography, exercise, and 24-h electrocardiogram monitor. An ajmaline test with conventional and high RPLs was undertaken in 670 (74%) relatives without a familial diagnosis after initial evaluation. Further investigations were guided by clinical suspicion.

RESULTS

An inherited cardiac disease was diagnosed in 128 (42%) families and 201 (22%) relatives. BrS was the most prevalent diagnosis (n = 85, 28% of families; n = 140, 15% of relatives). Ajmaline testing was required to unmask the BrS in 97% of diagnosed individuals. The use of high RPLs showed a 16% incremental diagnostic yield of ajmaline testing by diagnosing BrS in an additional 49 families. There were no differences of the characteristics between individuals and families with a diagnostic pattern in the conventional and the high RPLs. On follow-up, a spontaneous type 1 Brugada pattern and/or clinically significant arrhythmic events developed in 17% (n = 25) of the concealed BrS cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic use of ajmaline testing with high RPLs increases substantially the yield of BrS in SADS families. Assessment should be performed in expert centers where patients are counseled appropriately for the potential implications of provocation testing.

Genetic testing and cascade screening in pediatric long QT syndrome and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of cascade screening for the inherited heart conditions long QT syndrome (LQTS) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is incompletely characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the use of genetic testing and yield of cascade screening across diverse regions in the United States and to evaluate obstacles to screening in multipayer systems.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved 6 United States pediatric center retrospective chart review of LQTS and HCM patients from 2008-2014 was conducted for (1) genetic test completion and results and (2) family cascade screening acceptance, methods, results, and barriers.

RESULTS

The families of 315 index patients (mean age 9.0 ± 5.8 years) demonstrated a 75% (254) acceptance of cascade screening. The yield of relative screening was 39% (232/601), an average of 0.91 detected per family. Genetic testing was less utilized in HCM index patients and relatives. Screening participation was greater in families of gene-positive index patients (88%) (P <.001) compared to gene-negative patients (53%). Cascade method utilization: Cardiology-only 45%, combined genetic and cardiology 39%, and genetic only 16%. Screening yield by method: combined 57%, genetic-only 29%, and cardiology-only 20%. Family decisions were the leading barriers to cascade screening (26% lack of followthrough and 26% declined), whereas insurance (6%) was the least cited barrier.

CONCLUSION

Family participation in cascade screening is high, but the greatest barriers are family mediated (declined, lack of followthrough). Positive proband genetic testing led to greater participation. Cardiology-only screening was the most utilized method, but combined cardiology and genetic screening had the highest detection.

Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology

Although sudden cardiac death (SCD) is one of the most important modes of death in Western countries, pathologists and public health physicians have not given this problem the attention it deserves. New methods of preventing potentially fatal arrhythmias have been developed and the accurate diagnosis of the causes of SCD is now of particular importance. Pathologists are responsible for determining the precise cause and mechanism of sudden death but there is still considerable variation in the way in which they approach this increasingly complex task. The Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology has developed these guidelines, which represent the minimum standard that is required in the routine autopsy practice for the adequate investigation of SCD. The present version is an update of our original article, published 10 years ago. This is necessary because of our increased understanding of the genetics of cardiovascular diseases, the availability of new diagnostic methods, and the experience we have gained from the routine use of the original guidelines. The updated guidelines include a detailed protocol for the examination of the heart and recommendations for the selection of histological blocks and appropriate material for toxicology, microbiology, biochemistry, and molecular investigation. Our recommendations apply to university medical centers, regionals hospitals, and all healthcare professionals practicing pathology and forensic medicine. We believe that their adoption throughout Europe will improve the standards of autopsy practice, allow meaningful comparisons between different communities and regions, and permit the identification of emerging patterns of diseases causing SCD. Finally, we recommend the development of regional multidisciplinary networks of cardiologists, geneticists, and pathologists. Their role will be to facilitate the identification of index cases with a genetic basis, to screen appropriate family members, and ensure that appropriate preventive strategies are implemented.

Brugada syndrome in children - Stepping into unchartered territory

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an autosomal dominant inherited channelopathy. It is associated with a typical pattern of ST-segment elevation in the precordial leads V1-V3 and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias in otherwise healthy patients. It is frequently seen in young Asian males, in whom it has previously been described as sudden unexplained nocturnal death syndrome. Although it typically presents in young adults, it is also known to present in children and infants, especially in the presence of fever. Our understanding of the genetic pathogenesis and management of BrS has grown substantially considering that it has only been 24 years since its first description as a unique clinical entity. However, there remains much to be learned, especially in the pediatric population. This review aims to discuss the epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis of BrS. We will also discuss established standards and new innovations in the diagnosis, prognostication, risk stratification, and management of BrS. Literature search was run on the National Center for Biotechnology Information's website, using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) database with the search term "Brugada Syndrome" (MeSH), and was run on the PubMed database using the age filter (birth-18 years), yielding 334 results. The abstracts of all these articles were studied, and the articles were categorized and organized. Articles of relevance were read in full. As and where applicable, relevant references and citations from the primary articles were further explored and read in full.

A survey of paediatricians on the use of electrocardiogram for pre-participation sports screening

Aim The aim of the present study was to determine general paediatrician knowledge, practices, and attitudes towards electrocardiogram (ECG) screening in school athletes during pre-participation screening exam (PPSE).

METHODS

Paediatricians affiliated with a tertiary children's hospital completed a survey about ECGs for PPSE.

RESULTS

In total, 205/498 (41%) responded; 92% of the paediatricians did not include an ECG as part of PPSE; 56% were aware of a case in which a student athlete in their own community had died of sudden unexplained death; 4% had an athlete in their practice die. Only 16% of paediatricians perform all 12 American Heart Association recommended elements of the PPSE. If any of these screening elements are abnormal, 69% obtain an ECG, 36% an echocardiogram, and 30% restrict patients from sports activity; 73% of them refer the patient to a cardiologist.

CONCLUSION

Most of the general paediatricians surveyed did not currently perform ECGs for PPSE. In addition, there was a low rate of adherence to performing the 12 screening elements recommended by the American Heart Association. They have trouble obtaining timely, accurate ECG interpretations, worry about potential unnecessary exercise restrictions, and cost-effectiveness. The practical hurdles to ECG implementation emphasise the need for a fresh look at PPSE, and not just ECG screening. Improvements in ECG performance/interpretation would be necessary for ECGs to be a useful part of PPSE.

Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young

Although the occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a young person is a rare event, it is traumatic and often widely publicized. In recent years, SCD in this population has been increasingly seen as a public health and safety issue. This review presents current knowledge relevant to the epidemiology of SCD and to strategies for prevention, resuscitation, and identification of those at greatest risk. Areas of active research and controversy include the development of best practices in screening, risk stratification approaches and postmortem evaluation, and identification of modifiable barriers to providing better outcomes after resuscitation of young SCD patients. Institution of a national registry of SCD in the young will provide data that will help to answer these questions.

Impact of clinical and genetic findings on the management of young patients with Brugada syndrome

BACKGROUND

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an arrhythmogenic disease associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD) that seldom manifests or is recognized in childhood.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical presentation of pediatric BrS to identify prognostic factors for risk stratification and to propose a data-based approach management.

METHODS

We studied 106 patients younger than 19 years at diagnosis of BrS enrolled from 16 European hospitals.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, BrS was spontaneous (n = 36, 34%) or drug-induced (n = 70, 66%). The mean age was 11.1 ± 5.7 years, and most patients were asymptomatic (family screening, (n = 67, 63%; incidental, n = 13, 12%), while 15 (14%) experienced syncope, 6(6%) aborted SCD or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia, and 5 (5%) other symptoms. During follow-up (median 54 months), 10 (9%) patients had life-threatening arrhythmias (LTA), including 3 (3%) deaths. Six (6%) experienced syncope and 4 (4%) supraventricular tachycardia. Fever triggered 27% of LTA events. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 22 (21%), with major adverse events in 41%. Of the 11 (10%) patients treated with hydroquinidine, 8 remained asymptomatic. Genetic testing was performed in 75 (71%) patients, and SCN5A rare variants were identified in 58 (55%); 15 of 32 tested probands (47%) were genotype positive. Nine of 10 patients with LTA underwent genetic testing, and all were genotype positive, whereas the 17 SCN5A-negative patients remained asymptomatic. Spontaneous Brugada type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern (P = .005) and symptoms at diagnosis (P = .001) were predictors of LTA. Time to the first LTA event was shorter in patients with both symptoms at diagnosis and spontaneous Brugada type 1 ECG pattern (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Spontaneous Brugada type 1 ECG pattern and symptoms at diagnosis are predictors of LTA events in the young affected by BrS. The management of BrS should become age-specific, and prevention of SCD may involve genetic testing and aggressive use of antipyretics and quinidine, with risk-specific consideration for the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Sudden infant death syndrome caused by cardiac arrhythmias: only a matter of genes encoding ion channels?

Sudden infant death syndrome is the unexpected demise of a child younger than 1 year of age which remains unexplained after a complete autopsy investigation. Usually, it occurs during sleep, in males, and during the first 12 weeks of life. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying the death is unknown, and the lethal episode is considered multifactorial. However, in cases without a conclusive post-mortem diagnosis, suspicious of cardiac arrhythmias may also be considered as a cause of death, especially in families suffering from any cardiac disease associated with sudden cardiac death. Here, we review current understanding of sudden infant death, focusing on genetic causes leading to lethal cardiac arrhythmias, considering both genes encoding ion channels as well as structural proteins due to recent association of channelopathies and desmosomal genes. We support a comprehensive analysis of all genes associated with sudden cardiac death in families suffering of infant death. It allows the identification of the most plausible cause of death but also of family members at risk, providing cardiologists with essential data to adopt therapeutic preventive measures in families affected with this lethal entity.

Sudden Unexplained Death - Treating the Family

Sudden unexplained death in the context of a normal heart at post-mortem and negative toxicological analysis is termed sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS). SADS is often due to cardiac genetic disease, particularly channelopathies. Assessment of family members of SADS victims will reveal at least one affected individual in up to half of families. Specialist evaluation begins with an expert cardiac autopsy that improves diagnostic accuracy and minimises erroneous interpretation of minor pathological findings. Retention of appropriate material for post-mortem genetic testing, 'the molecular autopsy', is recommended as this may provide a genetic diagnosis in up to a third of cases. Clinical assessment of families initially comprises 12-lead ECG with high right ventricular leads, echocardiogram and exercise testing. Additional investigations include sodium channel blocker and epinephrine provocation tests. Families with a diagnosis should be managed as per guidelines. Those with negative investigations can generally be discharged unless they are young and/or symptomatic.