Mechanisms of Posterior Fascicular Tachycardia

Upper turnaround point in a reentry circuit of the idiopathic left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The anatomic extent of the reentry circuit in idiopathic left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) is yet to be fully elucidated. We hypothesized that entrainment mapping could be used to delineate the reentry circuit of an LPF-VT, especially including the upper turnaround point.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive LPF-VT patients (mean age, 29 ± 9 years, 18 males) were included. We performed overdrive pacing with entrainment attempts at the left bundle branch (LBB) and the left His bundle (HB) region.

RESULTS

Overdrive pacing from the LBB region showed concealed fusion in all 23 patients (post-pacing interval [PPI], 322.1 ± 64.3 ms; tachycardia cycle length [TCL], 319.0 ± 61.6 ms; PPI-TCL, 3.1 ± 4.6 ms) with a long stimulus-to-QRS interval (287.9 ± 58.0 ms, approximately 90% of the TCL). Pacing from the same LBB region at a slightly faster pacing rate showed manifest fusion with antidromic conduction to the LBB and minimal in-and-out time to the LBB potential (PPI-TCL, 21.3 ± 13.7 ms). Overdrive pacing from the left HB region showed manifest fusion with a long PPI-TCL (53.9 ± 22.5 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pacing study results suggest that the upper turnaround point in a reentry circuit of the LPF-VT may extend to the proximal His-Purkinje conduction system near the LBB region but below the left HB region. The LPF may constitute the retrograde limb of the reentry circuit.

False Tendons in the Left Ventricle: Implications for Successful Ablation of Left Posterior Fascicular Tachycardias

BACKGROUND

The anatomical substrate for left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe the endocavitary substrate of the re-entrant loop of LPF-VT.

METHODS

A total of 26 consecutive patients with LPF-VT underwent an electrophysiology study and radiofrequency ablation.

RESULTS

Intracardiac echocardiography imaging observed a 100% prevalence of false tendons (FTs) at the left posterior septal region in all patients, and 3 different types of FTs could be classified according to their location. In 22 patients, a P1 potential could be recorded via the multielectrode catheter from a FT. In 4 patients without a recorded P1 during LPF-VT, the earliest P2 potentials were recorded from a FT in 3 patients, and from a muscular connection between 2 posteromedial papillary muscles in 1 patient. Catheter ablation focused on the FTs with P1 or earliest P2 (in patients without P1) was successful in all 26 patients. After 19 ± 8.5 months of follow-up, no patients had recurrence of LPF-VT.

CONCLUSIONS

FTs provide an electroanatomical substrate for LPF-VT and a "culprit FT" may be identified as the critical structure bridging the macro-re-entrant loop. Targeting the "culprit FT" is a novel anatomical ablation strategy that results in long-term arrhythmia-free survival.

Fascicular Ventricular Tachycardias: Potential Role of the Septal Fascicle

Ventricular tachycardias involving the fascicular system are amongst the most challenging and intriguing arrhythmias for cardiac electrophysiologists. Although some of the more common forms have been recognized clinically for decades, other variants continue to be characterized. Moreover, considerable uncertainty persists to date with regards to the mechanisms underpinning these arrhythmias. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the seminal historical and contemporary observations that have collectively advanced our understanding of fascicular ventricular tachycardias. From this base, we canvas the basic and clinical evidence supporting a potential role for the septal fascicular network and propose a new schema hypothesizing involvement of this fascicle. Although we focus primarily on the most common left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia, our discussion and proposal have mechanistic and therapeutic implications for the spectrum of fascicular arrhythmias.

The change of cardiac axis deviation in catheter ablation of verapamil-sensitive idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The underlying mechanism of verapamil-sensitive idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (ILVT) has been postulated to be reentrant activation in the Purkinje fiber network of the left posterior fascicle or the left anterior fascicle (LAF). However, changing of cardiac axis deviation in sinus rhythm (SR) or during ILVT after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been rarely analyzed.

METHODS

Of the 232 patients with sustained ILVT induced and surface electrocardiogram (ECG) in SR recorded before and after RFCA, the changes of ECG morphology in SR and during ILVT were analyzed.

RESULTS

The surface ECG in SR changed in 114 (49.1%) patients after RFCA. ILVT could still be induced in 27 (23.7%) patients. In comparison with the original ILVT, three forms of ECG morphology were observed. In eight patients, the ILVT morphology was unchanged. In the 13 patients with ILVT axis deviation conversion after ablation, the successful target was more proximal. In the six patients with ILVT morphology change but without axis deviation conversion after ablation, the successful ablation site was more distal. Among 15 patients with recurrent ILVT during follow-up, seven patients had previous axis deviation changes in SR after RFCA, the changes maintained in four patients and recovered in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology changes on surface ECG in SR after RFCA would not be a necessary prerequisite or a good endpoint for ILVT ablation. To analyze ILVT morphology changes after ablation would help to further clarify an appropriate approach for catheter ablation of ILVT.

New Insights on Verapamil-Sensitive Idiopathic Left Fascicular Tachycardia

Verapamil-sensitive left fascicular monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (LF-VT) was first described ~4 decades ago. Our knowledge regarding this arrhythmia is evolving continuously. The current review aims to highlight up to date aspects of this arrhythmia focusing on its ECG recognition, new considerations of the reentrant circuit, ablation targets in inducible and non-inducible patients and the approach to LF-VT with multiform morphology.

Macroreentrant Loop in Ventricular Tachycardia From the Left Posterior Fascicle

Background—

The underlying mechanisms of reentry during left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to describe the components of LPF-VT reentry circuit and their electrophysiological properties.

Methods and Results—

Fourteen consecutive patients with LPF-VT underwent electrophysiology study and radiofrequency ablation. Via a multipolar electrode catheter placed from a retrograde aortic approach, a sharp inflection, high-frequency potential (P1) was detected in 9 patients (64%). The ranges of length and velocity of recorded P1 were 9 to 30 mm and 0.5 to 1.2 mm/ms, respectively. Macroreentry involving the ventricular myocardium was confirmed to be the mechanism in all patients by premature ventricular stimuli delivery or entrainment of LPF-VT with progressive fusion, or both. During LPF-VT, the earliest left posterior fascicle (LPF, P2) was considered to be the site of connection between P1 and P2, and the site of the earliest P2 along the left posterior ventricular septum correlated well with the His-ventricular interval during tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation focused on the P1 potentials (9 patients with a recorded P1) or earliest P2 (5 patients without a recorded P1) was successful in all 14 patients. After 4.5±3.0 months of follow-up, no patients had recurrence of LPF-VT.

Conclusions—

The LPF-VT macroreentrant loop involves the ventricular myocardium, a part of the LPF, a slow conduction zone, and in certain cases, a specially conducting P1 fiber. The His-ventricular interval during LPF-VT correlates with multiple electrophysiological measures and is a useful marker for identification of the optimal ablation site.