Association of Left Atrial High-Resolution Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance With Electrogram Abnormalities Beyond Voltage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Utility of CT and MRI in Cardiac Electrophysiology

Cardiac electrophysiology involves the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias. CT and MRI play an increasingly important role in cardiac electrophysiology, primarily in preprocedural planning of ablation procedures but also in procedural guidance and postprocedural follow-up. The most common applications include ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), and for planning cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). For AF ablation, preprocedural evaluation includes anatomic evaluation and planning using CT or MRI as well as evaluation for left atrial fibrosis using MRI, a marker of poor outcomes following ablation. Procedural guidance during AF ablation is achieved by fusing anatomic data from CT or MRI with electroanatomic mapping to guide the procedure. Postprocedural imaging with CT following AF ablation is commonly used to evaluate for complications such as pulmonary vein stenosis and atrioesophageal fistula. For VT ablation, both MRI and CT are used to identify scar, representing the arrhythmogenic substrate targeted for ablation, and to plan the optimal approach for ablation. CT or MR images may be fused with electroanatomic maps for intraprocedural guidance during VT ablation and may also be used to assess for complications following ablation. Finally, functional information from MRI may be used to identify patients who may benefit from CRT, and cardiac vein mapping with CT or MRI may assist in planning access. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Left atrial volume affects the correlation of voltage map with magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The low-voltage area detected by electroanatomic mapping (EAM) is a surrogate marker of left atrial fibrosis. However, the correlation between the EAM and late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) has been inconsistent among studies. This study aimed to investigate how LA size affects the correlation between EAM and LGE-MRI.

METHODS

High-density EAMs of the LA during sinus rhythm were collected in 22 patients undergoing AF ablation. The EAMs were co-registered with pre-ablation LGE-MRI models. Voltages in the areas with and without LGE were recorded. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) was calculated from MRI, and LAVI > 62 ml/m2 was defined as significant LA enlargement (LAE).

RESULTS

Atrial bipolar voltage negatively correlates with the left atrial volume index. The median voltages in areas without LGE were 1.1 mV vs 2.0 mV in patients with vs without significant LAE (p = 0.002). In areas of LGE, median voltages were 0.4 mV vs 0.8 mV in patients with vs without significant LAE (p = 0.02). A voltage threshold of 1.7 mV predicted atrial LGE in patients with normal or mildly enlarged LA (sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 59%, respectively). In contrast, areas of voltage less than 0.75 mV correlated with LGE in patients with significant LA enlargement (sensitivity 68% and specificity 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

LAVI affects left atrial bipolar voltage, and the correlation between low-voltage areas and LGE-MRI. Distinct voltage thresholds according to the LAVI value might be considered to identify atrial scar by EAM.

Quantitative analysis of fractionated electrogram area of left atrium during right atrial pacing as an indicator of left atrial electrical remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

The clinical significance of left atrial local electrogram fractionation after restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been elucidated.

Methods

We evaluated ultrahigh-resolution maps of the left atrium (LA) during RA pacing acquired after pulmonary vein isolation in 40 patients with AF. The association between low-voltage area (LVA, <0.5 mV), fractionated electrogram area (FEA, the highlighted area with LUMIPOINT™ Complex Activation), the interval from onset of LA activation to wavefront collision at the mitral isthmus (LA activation time), and wave propagation velocity (WPV) was evaluated quantitatively.

Results

The total LVA, total FEA with ≥5.0 peaks or ≥7.0 peaks were 7.0 ± 7.9 cm2, 15.9 ± 12.9 cm2, and 5.2 ± 7.5 cm2, respectively. These areas were predominantly observed in the anteroseptal region. Total LVA, total FEA with ≥5.0 peaks, and total FEA with ≥5.0 peaks in the normal voltage area (NVA: ≥0.5 mV) correlated with LA activation time (R = 0.69, 0.75, and 0.71; each p < .0001). In the anterior wall, these areas correlated with regional mean WPV (R = -0.75, -0.83, and - 0.55; each p < .0001) and the extent of slow conduction area (SCA) with WPV <0.3 m/s (R = 0.89, 0.84, 0.33; p < .0001 for LVA and FEA, p < .05 for FEA located in NVA). The anterior wall FEA with ≥7.0 peaks and that in the NVA showed a better correlation in predicting anterior wall SCA (R = 0.92 and 0.86, each p < .0001).

Conclusion

Quantitative analysis of FEA together with LVA may facilitate the assessment of LA electrical remodeling.

SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.

Correlation between Cardiac MRI and Voltage Mapping in Evaluating Atrial Fibrosis: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To provide an overview of existing literature on the association between late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac MRI and low voltage areas (LVA) obtained with electroanatomic mapping (EAM) or histopathology when assessing atrial fibrosis.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all studies published until June 7, 2022, comparing LGE cardiac MRI to LVA EAM and/or histopathology for evaluation of atrial fibrosis. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022338243). Two reviewers independently evaluated the studies for inclusion. Risk of bias and applicability for each included study were assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Data regarding demographics, electrophysiology, LGE cardiac MRI, and study outcomes were extracted.

Results

The search yielded 1048 total results, of which 22 studies were included. Nineteen of the 22 included studies reported a significant correlation between high signal intensity at LGE cardiac MRI and LVA EAM or histopathology. However, there was great heterogeneity between included studies regarding study design, patient samples, cardiac MRI performance and postprocessing, and EAM performance.

Conclusion

Current literature suggests a correlation between LGE cardiac MRI and LVA EAM or histopathology when evaluating atrial fibrosis but high heterogeneity between studies, demonstrating the need for uniform choices regarding cardiac MRI and EAM acquisition in future studies.

Keywords: Cardiac, MR Imaging, Left Atrium

Supplemental material is available for this article.

© RSNA, 2022

Role of advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography and MRI in atrial and ventricular ablation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing evidence supports the use of advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the work-up of patients with arrythmias being considered for ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in imaging technology and postprocessing are facilitating the use of advanced imaging before, during and after ablation in patients with both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.In atrial arrythmias, quantitative assessment of left atrial wall thickness on CCT and quantification of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR identify patients more likely to develop recurrent atrial arrythmias following ablation. In addition, in patients with recurrent arrythmia post ablation, LGE CMR can potentially identify targets for repeat ablation.In ventricular arrythmias, qualitative assessment of LGE can aide in determining the optimal ablation approach and predicts likelihood of ventricular arrythmias inducibility. Quantitative assessment of LGE can identify conduction channels that can be targeted for ablation. On CCT, quantitative assessment of left ventricular wall thickness can demonstrate myocardial ridges associated with re-entrant circuits for ablation.

SUMMARY

This review focuses on the utility of CCT and CMR in identifying key anatomical components and arrhythmogenic substrate contributing to both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients being considered for ablation. Advanced imaging has the potential to improve procedural outcomes, decrease complications and shorten procedural time.

Fixed complex electrograms during sinus rhythm and local pacing: potential ablation targets for persistent atrial fibrillation

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, complex electrograms during sinus rhythm (C-EGMs) could be pathological or not. We aimed to demonstrate whether local pacing was helpful to discern pathological C-EGMs. 126 persistent AF patients and 27 patients with left-side accessory pathway (LAP) underwent left atrial mapping during sinus rhythm. If C-EGMs were detected, local pacing was performed. If the electrograms turned normal, we defined them as non-fixed C-EGMs, otherwise as fixed C-EGMs. No difference was detected in the incidence and proportion of non-fixed C-EGMs between AF patients and LAP patients (101/126 vs. 19/27, P = 0.26; 9.1 ± 6.0% vs. 7.7 ± 5.7%, P = 0.28). However, the incidence and proportion of fixed C-EGMs were higher in persistent AF patients (87/126 vs. 1/27, P < 0.01; 4.3 ± 3.4% vs. 0.1 ± 0.5%, P < 0.01). Compared with non-fixed C-EGMs, fixed C-EGMs had lower amplitudes, longer electrogram durations and longer Stimuli-P wave internals. All AF patients received circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Among AF patients with fixed C-EGMs, 45 patients received fixed C-EGMs ablation and 42 patients underwent linear ablation. Compared with linear ablation, fixed C-EGMs ablation reduced recurrence (HR: 0.43; 95% CI 0.21‐0.81; P = 0.011). Among patients without fixed C-EGMs ablation, the proportion of fixed C-EGMs was an independent predictor of ablation outcomes (HR for per percent: 1.13, 95% CI 1.01–1.28, P = 0.038). C-EGMs could be classified into fixed and non-fixed C-EGMs through local pacing. Fixed rather than non-fixed C-EGMs might indicate abnormal atrial substrates and fixed C-EGMs ablation improve outcomes of persistent AF ablation.

Grid-mapping catheters versus PentaRay catheters for left atrial mapping on ensite precision mapping system

INTRODUCTION

Areas displaying reduced bipolar voltage are defined as low-voltage areas (LVAs). Moreover, left atrial (LA) LVAs after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been reported as a predictor of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study, we compared grid mapping catheter (GMC) with PentaRay catheter (PC) for LA voltage mapping on Ensite Precision mapping system.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients with LVAs and border zone within the LA were enrolled. After achieving PVI, voltage mapping under high right atrial pacing for 600 ms was performed twice using each catheter type (GMC first, PC next). Furthermore, LVA was defined as a region with a bipolar voltage of <0.50, and border zone was defined as a region with a bipolar voltage of <1.0, or <1.5 mV.

RESULTS

Compared with PC, using GMC, voltage mapping contained more mapping points (20 242 [15 859, 26 013] vs. 5589 [4088, 7649]; p < .0001), and more mapping points per minute(1428 [1275, 1803] vs. 558 [372, 783]; p < .0001). In addition, LVA and border zone size using GMC was significantly less than that reported using PC: <1.0 mV (5.9 cm² [2.9, 20.2] vs. 13.9 cm² [6.3, 24.1], p  =  .018) and <1.5 mV voltage cutoff (10.6 cm² [6.6, 27.2] vs. 21.6 cm² [12.6, 35.0], p  =  .005).

CONCLUSION

Bipolar voltage amplitude estimated by GMC was significantly larger than that estimated by PC on Ensite Precision mapping system. GMC may be able to find highly selective identification of LVAs with lower prevalence and smaller LVA and border zone size.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: cardiac imaging guidance as an adjunct to the electrophysiological guided approach

Catheter ablation is increasingly utilized to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite progress in technology and procedural strategy, there remain significant limitations with suboptimal outcomes. The role of imaging has continued to evolve, and multimodality imaging now presents an important opportunity to make substantial progress in the safety and efficacy of ablation. In this review, we discuss the history of imaging in the ablation of AF with a specific focus on the ability of cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to characterize anatomy, arrhythmogenic substrate, and guide ablation strategy. We will review the progress that has been made and highlight many of the limitations as well as future directions for the field.

Characterization of cardiac electrogram signals in atrial arrhythmias

Despite significant advancements in 3D cardiac mapping systems utilized in daily electrophysiology practices, the characterization of atrial substrate remains crucial for the comprehension of supraventricular arrhythmias. During mapping, intracardiac electrograms (EGM) provide specific information that the cardiac electrophysiologist is required to rapidly interpret during the course of a procedure in order to perform an effective ablation. In this review, EGM characteristics collected during sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) are analyzed, focusing on amplitude, duration and fractionation. Additionally, EGMs recorded during atrial fibrillation (AF), including complex fractionated atrial EGMs (CFAE), may also provide precious information. A complete understanding of their significance remains lacking, and as such, we aimed to further explore the role of CFAE in strategies for ablation of persistent AF. Considering focal atrial tachycardias (AT), current cardiac mapping systems provide excellent tools that can guide the operator to the site of earliest activation. However, only careful analysis of the EGM, distinguishing low amplitude high frequency signals, can reliably identify the absolute best site for RF. Evaluating macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia circuits, specific EGM signatures correspond to particular electrophysiological phenomena: the careful recognition of these EGM patterns may in fact reveal the best site of ablation. In the near future, mathematical models, integrating patient-specific data, such as cardiac geometry and electrical conduction properties, may further characterize the substrate and predict future (potential) reentrant circuits.

Visualization of intensive atrial inflammation and fibrosis after cryoballoon ablation: PET/MRI and LGE-MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial inflammation plays an important role in initiating atrial fibrosis, which could perpetuate atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the method of visualization of atrial inflammation has not been established. We sought to investigate whether the intensive atrial inflammation caused by cryoballoon ablation (CBA) could be detected by positron emission tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) and whether the atrial inflammation could be associated with consequent fibrosis.

METHODS

A total of 10 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients after CBA were enrolled. To detect and quantify intensive atrial inflammation, PET/MRI was performed to assess regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake one day after the CBA, and the standardized uptake values (SUV) max were compared between the pulmonary vein (PV) antrum where CBA could be applied and the healthy left atrial (LA) wall where CBA could not be applied. Furthermore, the atrial inflammation one day after the procedure and atrial fibrosis areas one month after the procedure were three-dimensionally quantified by PET/MRI and late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI), respectively.

RESULTS

The mean SUV max at the PV antrum was significantly higher than that on the healthy LA wall (2.12 ± 0.35 vs 1.73 ± 0.30, P = .00021). The volume of the atrial inflammation strongly correlated with that of the atrial fibrosis (r = .94 [.76-.99], P = .00006).

CONCLUSIONS

The atrial inflammation after CBA could be detected by PET/MRI. CBA-induced atrial inflammation was strongly associated with consequent lesion maturation.

Advancements in Imaging for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Is There a Potential to Improve Procedural Outcomes?

Since the introduction of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in the 1990s, the procedure has continuously evolved, with gradual improvements in outcomes and safety. Recent technological advancements include the introduction of contact force catheters and high-resolution electroanatomical mapping systems, while imaging modalities including transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy have become integral parts of AF ablation procedures. Further, intraprocedural intracardiac echocardiography and the integration of cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography images with electroanatomical mapping have shown promise to improve procedural outcomes by reducing radiation exposure and procedural times. However, available data on procedural utility and the reduction in AF recurrence rates associated with these modalities are mixed. This review therefore aims to discuss the current common imaging modalities used in AF ablation and their potential impact on outcomes. In particular, imaging is discussed with respect to the important information it offers before, during, and after the procedure. Perspectives on the future of imaging in AF ablation are also shared.