Inverse Relationship of Blood Pressure to Long-Term Outcomes and Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Mild Heart Failure

Optimizing Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillator in a Multicenter Study of Japanese Patients - Assessment of the MADIT-ICD Benefit Score

BACKGROUND

Although the MADIT-ICD benefit score (MBS) helps select suitable implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, optimal indicators for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain uncertain. Evaluating the applicability of the MBS in Japanese CRT patients is imperative.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter study assessed the cumulative incidence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and non-arrhythmic mortality (AM) in CRT patients grouped according to potential benefit (lowest, highest, and intermediate). Among 400 primary prevention patients (mean age 65 years, 76% male), VT/VF occurred in 4 (7%), 68 (24%), and 14 (23%) patients in the lowest-, intermediate-, and highest-benefit groups, respectively (P=0.027), over a median follow-up of 34 months. Non-arrhythmic death was observed in 15 (25%), 91 (33%), and 9 (15%) patients in the lowest-, intermediate-, and highest-benefit groups, respectively (P=0.025). Multivariate analysis identified VT/VF score ≥7 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-4.19; P=0.027) as a significant VT/VF predictor. The presence of left bundle branch block (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.92; P=0.025) was associated with a reduced risk of VT/VF events. Non-AM score ≥3 (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.01-2.88; P=0.047), systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.25-2.70; P=0.002), and estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2(HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.23-3.20; P=0.005) were significant predictors of non-arrhythmic death.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBS can identify suitable candidates for CRT-D among Japanese individuals.

Systolic Blood Pressure and Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Low systolic blood pressure (SBP) was previously suggested to be a marker for heart failure and mortality in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to explore the association of SBP on risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) and atrial arrhythmias as well as appropriate and inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The study population comprised 1,481 of 1,500 (99%) patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy trial. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify the association of baseline SBP (recorded prior to ICD implantation) with the risk of VTA > 170 beats/min during follow-up (primary end point) and atrial arrhythmia, appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy, hospitalization and death (secondary end points). SBP was dichotomized at 120 mm Hg (approximate mean and median) and was also assessed as a continuous measure. Multivariate analysis showed that each 10 mm Hg decrement in SBP was associated with corresponding 11% increased risk for VTA (p = 0.008). Low SBP (≤120 mm Hg) was associated with a significant 58% (p = 0.002) increased risk for VTA ≥170 beats/min; 53% (p = 0.019) increased risk for VTA ≥200 beats/min; and 65% (p = 0.001) increased risk for appropriate ICD therapy, as compared with SBP >120 mm Hg. Low SBP was not associated with increased risk of atrial arrhythmias, and inappropriate ICD therapy. In conclusion, in MADIT-RIT, SBP (≤120 mm Hg) predicted higher rates of VTA. These findings suggest that SBP may be utilized for VTA risk stratification in candidates for primary ICD therapy.

Non-invasive hemodynamic determination of patient-specific optimal pacing mode in cardiac resynchronization therapy

PURPOSE

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices have multiple programmable pacing parameters. The purpose of this study was to determine the best pacing mode, i.e., associated with the greatest acute hemodynamic response, in each patient.

METHODS

Patients in sinus rhythm and intact atrioventricular conduction were included within 3 months of implantation of devices featuring SyncAV and multipoint pacing (MPP) algorithms. The effect of nominal biventricular pacing using the latest activated electrode (BiV-Late), optimized atrioventricular delay (AVD), nominal and optimized SyncAV, and anatomical MPP was determined by non-invasive measurement of systolic blood pressure (SBP). CRT response was defined as SBP increase > 10% relative to baseline.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) were included. BiV-Late increased SBP compared to intrinsic rhythm (128 ± 21 mmHg vs. 121 ± 22 mmHg, p = 0.0002). The best pacing mode further increased SBP to 140 ± 19 mmHg (p < 0.0001 vs. BiV-Late). The proportion of CRT responders increased from 40% with BiV-Late to 80% with the best pacing mode (p = 0.0005). Compared to BiV-Late, optimized AVD and optimized SyncAV increased SBP (to 134 ± 21 mmHg, p = 0.004, and 133 ± 20 mmHg, p = 0.0003, respectively), but nominal SyncAV and MPP did not. The best pacing mode was variable between patients and was different from nominal BiV-Late in 28 (93%) patients. Optimized AVD was the most frequent best mode, in 14 (47%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LBBB, the best pacing mode was patient-specific and doubled the magnitude of acute hemodynamic response and the proportion of acute CRT responders compared to nominal BiV-Late pacing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03779802.

The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamic parameters

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a device-based method of treatment which decreases morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study was aimed to investigate the effects of CRT on hemodynamic and arterial stiffness parameters evaluated by noninvasive method, and determine whether there is a correlation between the changes after CRT in these parameters and the clinical response to CRT or not.

METHODS

The study included 46 patients with HFrEF who were planned to undergo CRT implantation. Before the CRT implantation, clinical and demographic data were recorded from all patients. Hemodynamic and arterial stiffness parameters were measured oscillometrically by an arteriograph before CRT implantation. The patients were re-evaluated minimum three months after CRT; the above-mentioned parameters were measured again and compared to the pre-CRT period.

RESULTS

Compared to the period before CRT, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) (116.8 ± 19.1 mm Hg vs 127.7 ± 20.9 mm Hg, P = .005), central SBP (cSBP) (106.2 ± 17.3 mm Hg vs 116.8 ± 18.7 mm Hg, P = .015), cardiac output (CO) (4.6 ± 0.8 lt/min vs 5.1 ± 0.8 lt/min, P = .002), stroke volume (65.6 ± 16.3 mL vs 72.0 ± 14.9 mL), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) (10 ± 1.6 m/sec vs 10.4 ± 1.8 m/sec, P = .004) increased significantly in post-CRT period. In addition, the same parameters were significantly increased post-CRT period in patients with clinical response. However, there was not any similar increase in nonresponder patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that SBP, CO, and PWV increased significantly after CRT. The modest increases in these parameters were observed to be associated with positive clinical outcomes.

Prognostic Usefulness of Systolic Blood Pressure One-Year Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (from MADIT-CRT)

Low systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with increased mortality and heart failure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Data on the relation between SBP measured following cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation and subsequent clinical events are limited. We hypothesized that assessment of systolic blood pressure at 12 months after cardiac resynchronization therapy can be used to identify patients with increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The study population comprised 1000 patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in MADIT-CRT. Outcomes were compared between patients with low (<110 mm Hg) and preserved SBP (≥110 mm Hg) at 1 year. At 1 year following cardiac resynchronization therapy, 800 patients (80%) had preserved systolic blood pressure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the rate of heart failure or death during subsequent follow-up was significantly higher among patients with low SBP as compared with a preserved SBP at 12 months (2-year rates: 20% vs 12%, respectively; log-rank p value = 0.009 for the overall difference during follow-up). Consistently, multivariate analysis showed that patients with preserved SBP at 1 year had a 29% lower risk of HF or death when compared with the low SBP group (p = 0.024). The association between SBP measured following cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation and subsequent clinical events was more pronounced among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p value for SBP-by-HF etiology interaction = 0.034). In conclusion, assessment of SBP following cardiac resynchronization therapy can be used for improved long-term risk stratification in this population.

Myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy

BACKGROUND

Baseline predictors of myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in left bundle branch block (LBBB)-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective study included subjects with idiopathic NICM, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and LBBB. Myocardial recovery was defined as post-CRT LVEF ≥50%. Logistic regression analyses described associations between baseline characteristics and myocardial recovery. Cox regression analyses estimated the hazard ratio (HR) between myocardial recovery status and adverse clinical events.

RESULTS

In 105 subjects (mean age 61 years, 44% male, mean initial LVEF 22.6% ± 6.6%, 81% New York Heart Association class III, and 98% CRT-defibrillators), myocardial recovery after CRT was observed in 56 (54%) subjects. Hypertension, heart rate, and serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) had negative associations with myocardial recovery in univariable analyses. These associations persisted in multivariable analysis: hypertension (odds ratio (OR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.95; p = 0.04), heart rate (OR per 10 bpm, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-0.997; p = 0.048), and serum BUN (OR per 1 mg/dl, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99; p = 0.04). Subjects with post-CRT LVEF ≥50%, when compared to <50%, had lower risk for adverse clinical events (heart failure hospitalization, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, appropriate anti-tachycardia pacing therapy, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, and death) over a median follow-up of 75.9 months (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.88; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM, myocardial recovery after CRT was associated with absence of hypertension, lower heart rate, and lower serum BUN. Those with myocardial recovery had fewer adverse clinical events.

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): A comprehensive contemporary review on preventing early readmissions and postdischarge death

Heart failure (HF) is an increasingly prevalent syndrome and a leading cause of both first hospitalization and readmissions. Strikingly, up to 25% of the patients are readmitted within 30 to 60-days, accounting for HF as the primary cause for readmission in the adult population. Given its poor prognosis, one could describe it as a "malignant condition". Acute decompensation is intrinsically related to increased right heart tele-diastolic pressures and often related to congestive symptoms. In-hospital strategies to adequately compensate and timely discharge patients are limited. Conversely, the fragile early postdischarge phase is a vulnerable period when one could potentially intervene cost-effectively to improve survival and to reduce morbidity. Promising transitional hospital-to-home programs may have a broader role in the near future, namely for selected higher risk patients. However, identifying patients at risk for hospital readmission has been challenging. Novel approaches, such as ferric carboxymaltose and valsartan/sacubitril, and reemerging drugs, particularly digoxin, may reduce hospitalizations. Despite this, optimizing the use of "older" therapies is still warranted. Right heart pressures monitoring may provide novel insights into promptly outpatient management. Unfortunately, randomized trials in the specific ADHF population are scarce. A novel paradigmatic approach is needed in order to suitably improve the currently poor prognosis of ADHF. Both improving survival and reducing hospitalizations are, therefore, primordial therapy goals. Lastly, no single drug has consistently proved to improve survival in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); yet, some approaches may efficiently reduce hospitalizations. Awareness on HFpEF management beyond the failing heart is imperative.