Embracing the Long Road to Precision Medicine

Patient Phenotypes and SGLT-2 Inhibition in Type 2 Diabetes: Insights From the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

OBJECTIVES

Using latent class analysis (LCA) of EMPA-REG OUTCOME (BI 10773 [Empagliflozin] Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients), this study identified distinct phenotypes in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular (CV) disease and explored treatment effects across phenotypes.

BACKGROUND

In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, empagliflozin reduced risk of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) by 34% in subjects with T2D and CV disease. Among such subjects, there has been limited evaluation of clinical phenotypes.

METHODS

Overall, 7,020 participants were treated with empagliflozin 25 mg, 10 mg, or placebo. For this post hoc analysis, participants were randomly separated into training (two-thirds of patients) and validation (remaining one-third) sets. LCA identified 3 phenotype groups (n = 6,639 with complete data). The phenotype association with CV death or HHF and empagliflozin treatment effect across groups was explored by Cox regression (in training and validation sets).

RESULTS

In the training set, phenotype group 1 (n = 1,463; 33.1%) included younger patients with shorter T2D duration and the highest estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Phenotype group 2 (n = 1,172; 26.5%) included more women with non-coronary artery disease. Phenotype group 3 (n = 1,785; 40.4%) included older patients with advanced coronary disease and the lowest eGFR. The risk of CV death varied across phenotypes (group 2 vs. 1: hazard ratio [HR]; 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23 to 2.71; group 3 vs. 1: HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.30 to 2.67) with similar patterns for CV death or HHF. Consistent treatment effects of empagliflozin were seen across phenotypes in the training and validation sets (interaction p > 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Among participants with T2D, this study identified 3 phenotypes with varying CV risk. The treatment effect across phenotypes reaffirms the robustness of CV death or HHF reduction with empagliflozin. (BI 10773 [Empagliflozin] Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients [EMPA-REG OUTCOME]; NCT01131676).

Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Detailed Phenotypes, Prognosis, and Response to Spironolactone

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess if clinical phenogroups differ in comprehensive biomarker profiles, cardiac and arterial structure/function, and responses to spironolactone therapy.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies identified distinct subgroups (phenogroups) of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

Among TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial) participants, we performed latent-class analysis to identify HFpEF phenogroups based on standard clinical features and assessed differences in multiple biomarkers measured from frozen plasma; cardiac and arterial structure/function measured with echocardiography and arterial tonometry; prognosis; and response to spironolactone.

RESULTS

Three HFpEF phenogroups were identified. Phenogroup 1 (n = 1,214) exhibited younger age, higher prevalence of smoking, preserved functional class, and the least evidence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and arterial stiffness. Phenogroup 2 (n = 1,329) was older, with normotrophic concentric LV remodeling, atrial fibrillation, left atrial enlargement, large-artery stiffening, and biomarkers of innate immunity and vascular calcification. Phenogroup 3 (n = 899) demonstrated more functional impairment, obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, concentric LV hypertrophy, high renin, and biomarkers of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated inflammation, liver fibrosis, and tissue remodeling. Compared with phenogroup 1, phenogroup 3 exhibited the highest risk of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.79 to 4.24); phenogroups 2 and 3 demonstrated similar all-cause mortality (phenotype 2 HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.89 to 2.95; phenotype 3 HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.77 to 2.87). Spironolactone randomized therapy was associated with a more pronounced reduction in the risk of the primary endpoint in phenogroup 3 (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.95; p for interaction = 0.016). Results were similar after excluding participants from Eastern Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified important differences in circulating biomarkers, cardiac/arterial characteristics, prognosis, and response to spironolactone across clinical HFpEF phenogroups. These findings suggest distinct underlying mechanisms across clinically identifiable phenogroups of HFpEF that may benefit from different targeted interventions.