Impaired Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow Is Associated With Inducibility of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Relation of Myocardial Perfusion Reserve and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) using vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance is increasingly used to detect coronary artery disease. However, MPR can also be altered because of changes in microvascular function. We aimed to determine whether MPR can distinguish between ischemic cardiomyopathy (IC) secondary to coronary artery disease and non-IC (NIC) with microvascular dysfunction and no underlying epicardial coronary disease. A total of 60 patients (mean age 65 ± 14 years, 30% women), including 31 with IC and 29 with NIC, were identified from a pre-existing vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance registry. Short-axis cine slices were used to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using the Simpson method of disks. MPR index (MPRi) was determined from first-pass myocardial perfusion images during stress and rest using the upslope ratio, normalized for the arterial input and corrected for rate pressure product. Patients in both groups were divided into subgroups of LVEF ≤35% and LVEF >35%. Differences in MPRi between the subgroups were examined. MPRi was moderately correlated with LVEF in patients with NIC (r = 0.53, p = 0.03), whereas the correlation in patients with IC was lower (r = 0.32, p = 0.22). Average LVEF in NIC and IC was 34% ± 8% and 35% ± 8%, respectively (p = 0.63). MPRi was not significantly different in IC compared with NIC (1.17 [0.88 to 1.61] vs 1.23 [1.07 to 1.66], p = 0.41), including the subgroups of LVEF (IC: 1.20 ± 0.56 vs NIC: 1.15 ± 0.24, p = 0.75 for LVEF ≤35% and IC: 1.35 ± 0.44 vs NIC: 1.58 ± 0.50, p = 0.19 for LVEF >35%). However, MPRi was significantly lower in patients with LVEF ≤35% compared with those with LVEF>35% (1.17 ± 0.40 vs 1.47 ± 0.47, p = 0.01). Similar difference between LVEF groups was noted in the patients with NIC (1.15 ± 0.24 vs 1.58 ± 0.50, p = 0.006) but not in the patients with IC (1.20 ± 0.56 vs 1.35 ± 0.44, p = 0.42). MPRi can be abnormal in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction with nonischemic etiology. This is a potential pitfall to consider when using this approach to detect ischemia because of epicardial coronary disease using myocardial perfusion imaging.

Role of cardiac imaging in patients undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia is a major health issue in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy has significantly reduced the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in such patients, but on the other hand, it has led to frequent ICD shocks as an emerging problem, being associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations and increased mortality. Myocardial scar plays a central role in the genesis and maintenance of re-entrant arrhythmias, as the coexistence of surviving myocardial fibres within fibrotic tissue leads to the formation of slow conduction pathways and to a dispersion of activation and refractoriness that constitutes the milieu for ventricular tachycardia circuits. Catheter ablation has repeatedly proven to be well tolerated and highly effective in treating VT and in the last two decades has benefited from continuous efforts to determine ventricular tachycardia mechanisms by integration with a wide range of invasive and noninvasive imaging techniques such as intracardiac echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, multidetector computed tomography and nuclear imaging. Cardiovascular imaging has become a fundamental aid in planning and guiding catheter ablation procedures by integrating structural and electrophysiological information, enabling the ventricular tachycardia arrhythmogenic substrate to be characterized and effective ablation targets to be identified with increasing precision, and allowing the development of new ablation strategies with improved outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of cardiac imaging in patients undergoing catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

Multiparametric assessment of left atrial remodeling using 18F-FDG PET/CT cardiac imaging: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Left atrial (LA) remodeling is associated with structural, electric, and metabolic LA changes. Integrated evaluation of these features in vivo is lacking.

METHODS

Patients undergoing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp were classified into sinus rhythm (SR), paroxysmal AF (PAF), and persistent AF (PerAF). The LA was semiautomatically segmented, and global FDG uptake was quantified using standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) in gated, attenuation-corrected images and normalized to LA blood pool activity. Regression was used to relate FDG data to AF burden and critical patient factors. Continuous variables were compared using t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

117 patients were included (76% men, age 66.4 ± 11.0, ejection fraction (EF) 25[22-35]%) including those with SR (n = 48), PAF (n = 55), and PerAF (n = 14). Patients with any AF had increased SUVmean (2.3[1.5-2.4] vs 2.0[1.5-2.5], P = 0.006), SUVmax (4.4[2.8-6.7] vs 3.2[2.3-4.3], P < 0.001), uptake coefficient of variation (CoV) 0.28[0.22-0.40] vs 0.25[0.2-0.33], P < 0.001), and hypometabolic scar (32%[14%-53%] vs 16.5%[0%-38.5%], P = 0.01). AF burden correlated with increased SUVmean, SUVmax, CoV, and scar independent of age, gender, EF, or LA size (P < 0.03 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

LA structure and metabolism can be assessed using FDG PET/CT. Greater AF burden correlates with the increased LA metabolism and scar.

Modulation of P2Y6R expression exacerbates pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling in mice

Cardiac tissue remodeling caused by hemodynamic overload is a major clinical outcome of heart failure. Uridine-responsive purinergic P2Y₆ receptor (P2Y₆R) contributes to the progression of cardiovascular remodeling in rodents, but it is not known whether inhibition of P2Y₆R prevents or promotes heart failure. We demonstrate that inhibition of P2Y₆R promotes pressure overload-induced sudden death and heart failure in mice. In neonatal cardiomyocytes, knockdown of P2Y₆R significantly attenuated hypertrophic growth and cell death caused by hypotonic stimulation, indicating the involvement of P2Y₆R in mechanical stress-induced myocardial dysfunction. Unexpectedly, compared with wild-type mice, deletion of P2Y₆R promoted pressure overload-induced sudden death, as well as cardiac remodeling and dysfunction. Mice with cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of P2Y₆R also exhibited cardiac dysfunction and severe fibrosis. In contrast, P2Y₆R deletion had little impact on oxidative stress-mediated cardiac dysfunction induced by doxorubicin treatment. These findings provide overwhelming evidence that systemic inhibition of P2Y₆R exacerbates pressure overload-induced heart failure in mice, although P2Y₆R in cardiomyocytes contributes to the progression of cardiac fibrosis.

Value of CMR and PET in Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients Eligible for ICD

OBJECTIVES

This study presents a head-to-head comparison of the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left-ventricular (LV) function and scar burden and positron emission tomography (PET)-derived perfusion and innervation in predicting ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).

BACKGROUND

Improved risk stratification of VA is important to identify patients who should benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Perfusion abnormalities, sympathetic denervation, and scar burden have all been linked to VA, although comparative studies are lacking.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, referred for primary prevention ICD placement were enrolled prospectively. Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) CMR was performed to assess LV function and scar characteristics. [¹⁵O]H₂O and [¹¹C]hydroxyephedrine positron emission tomography (PET) were performed to quantify resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and sympathetic innervation. During follow-up of 5.4 ± 1.9 years, the occurrence of sustained VA, appropriate ICD therapy, and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 20 (26%) patients experienced VA. CMR and PET parameters showed considerable overlap between patients with VA and patients without VA, caused by substantial heterogeneity within groups. Univariable analyses showed that lower LVEF (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92; p = 0.03), higher left-ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) (HR 1.02; p < 0.01), and larger scar border zone (HR 1.11; p = 0.03) were related to VA. Scar core size, resting MBF, hyperemic MBF, perfusion defect size, innervation defect size, and the innervation-perfusion mismatch were not found to be associated with VA.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, lower LVEF, higher LVEDVi, and larger scar border zone were related to VA. PET-derived perfusion and sympathetic innervation, as well as CMR-derived scar core size were not associated with VA. These results suggest that improved prediction of VA by advanced imaging remains challenging for the individual patient.

Peri-Infarct Quantification by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Background:

In ischemic cardiomyopathy, cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of the peri-infarct zone, a potential substrate for arrhythmogenesis, may serve as a novel prognosticator and guide the optimal use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the prognostic value of the peri-infarct zone on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), EMBASE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), and CENTRAL (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) from inception to January 2019 for prognostic studies relating peri-infarct size with clinical outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. Pooled effect estimates were calculated with random effects models, risk of bias and strength of evidence were assessed by the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Education, respectively.

Results:

Twenty studies were eligible, representing 14 cohort studies (n=1518) with mean follow-up of 3.6 years and 6 cross-sectional studies (n=189). The extent of the peri-infarct zone was significantly predictive of all-cause mortality (3 studies; n=539; hazard ratio, 1.34/10 g [95% CI, 1.13–1.59]; I 2 =0%; high-quality evidence), appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy (5 studies; n=361; hazard ratio, 1.31/10 g [95% CI, 1.17–1.47]; I 2 =0%; high-quality evidence), and inducibility of ventricular tachycardia on electrophysiological study (5 studies; n=167; OR, 2.63/g [95% CI, 1.39–4.96]; I 2 =14%; low-quality evidence). After adjusting for age and left ventricular ejection fraction, the peri-infarct zone, as a percentage of total infarct size, remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (2 studies; n=445; hazard ratio, 1.29/10% [95% CI, 1.15–1.44]; I 2 =0%; high-quality evidence).

Conclusions:

There is limited but consistent evidence that quantification of the peri-infarct zone predicts long-term mortality and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Future studies should confirm whether late gadolinium enhancement-cardiac magnetic resonance assessment may improve implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment decisions.

Clinical Trial Registration:

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ . Unique identifier: CRD42017077337.

Relationship of non-invasive quantification of myocardial blood flow to arrhythmic events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Ischemia contributes to arrhythmogenesis though its role is incompletely understood. Abnormal myocardial perfusion measured by PET imaging may predict ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in a high-risk population.

METHODS

Patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators who had undergone rubidium-82 cardiac PET imaging were identified. Patients were stratified by median MBF and MFR values for analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the impact of myocardial perfusion on survival free of VT independent of critical covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients (124 (78%) males, median age 65.9 years, IQR [56.76-72.63]) were followed for 1.43 years IQR [0.83-2.21]. VA occurred in 29 patients (23.7%). After adjustment for ejection fraction, age, and sex, impaired stress MBF was associated with an increased risk of VA (adjusted HR per ml/min/g 1.52, 95% CI (1.01-2.31), P = 0.04). Summed rest and stress scores were not predictive of VA. Among patients with severe LV dysfunction, stress MBF remained an independent predictor of VA (adjusted HR per 1 ml/min/g HR 1.69, 95% CI (1.03-11.36), P = 0.03), while residual EF, summed rest, and summed stress scores were not (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired stress myocardial blood flow was associated with less survival free of ventricular arrhythmias.

Myocardial Scar But Not Ischemia Is Associated With Defibrillator Shocks and Sudden Cardiac Death in Stable Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the association of myocardial scar and ischemia with major arrhythmic events (MAEs) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%.

BACKGROUND

Although myocardial scar is a known substrate for ventricular arrhythmias, the association of myocardial ischemia with ventricular arrhythmias in stable patients with left ventricular dysfunction is less clear.

METHODS

A total of 439 consecutive patients (median age, 70 years; 78% male; 55% with implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]) referred for stress/rest positron emission tomography (PET) and resting LVEF ≤35% were included. Primary outcome was time-to-first MAE defined as sudden cardiac death, resuscitated sudden cardiac death, or appropriate ICD shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias ascertained by blinded adjudication of hospital records, Social Security Administration's Death Masterfile, National Death Index, and ICD vendor databases.

RESULTS

Ninety-one MAEs including 20 sudden cardiac deaths occurred in 75 (17%) patients during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Transmural myocardial scar was strongly associated with MAEs beyond age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, beta-blocker therapy, and resting LVEF (adjusted hazard ratio per 10% increase in scar, 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 1.80]; p < 0.001). However, non transmural scar/hibernation or markers of myocardial ischemia on PET including global or peri-infarct ischemia, coronary flow reserve, and resting or hyperemic myocardial blood flows were not associated with MAEs in univariable or multivariable analysis. These findings remained robust in subgroup analyses of patients with ICD (n = 223), with ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 287), and in patients without revascularization after the PET scan (n = 365).

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial scar but not ischemia was associated with appropriate ICD shocks and sudden cardiac death in patients with LVEF ≤35%. These findings have implications for risk-stratification of patients with left ventricular dysfunction who may benefit from ICD therapy.

NUCLEAR IMAGING IN SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH RISK ASSESSMENT

Sudden cardiac death is a cause of fatal outcomes in large proportion of cardiovascular patients. Left ventricle ejection fraction at the moment is the main criteria for sudden cardiac death risk stratification, however the parameter is not enough reliable. Nuclear imaging methods make it to visualize finer pathophysiological processes representing the probability of the life threatening ventricular arrhythmias development. The review is focused on recent data on nuclear imaging for cellular perfusion assessment, transient ischemia, vitality of myocardium and myocardial blood flow, metabolic disorders and sympathetic innervation.

Myocardial denervation coincides with scar heterogeneity in ischemic cardiomyopathy: A PET and CMR study

BACKGROUND

Mismatch between myocardial innervation and perfusion assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) is a potential risk marker for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. This mismatch zone originates from residual viable myocardium that has sustained ischemic nerve injury. Heterogenic scar size assessed with late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is also a risk marker of ventricular arrhythmias. These two imaging parameters may represent identical morphological tissue features. The current study explored the relation between innervation-perfusion mismatch and heterogenic scar size.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients (26 males, age 67 ± 8 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular ejection fraction below 35%, eligible for ICD implantation were included. All patients underwent both [11C]-hydroxyephedrine and [15O]-water PET studies to assess myocardial sympathetic innervation and perfusion. LGE CMR was conducted to assess total myocardial scar size, scar core size, and heterogenic scar size.

RESULTS

Perfusion defect size was 16.6 ± 9.9% and innervation defect size was 33.7 ± 10.8%, which resulted in an innervation-perfusion mismatch of 17.6 ± 8.9%. Total scar size, scar core size, and heterogenic scar size were 21.2 ± 8.6%, 14.7 ± 6.6%, and 6.5 ± 2.9%, respectively. No relation between scar core size and perfusion deficit size was observed (r = 0.18, P = .36). Total scar size was correlated with the innervation defect size (r = 0.52, P = .004) and the heterogenic scar zone displayed a significant correlation with the innervation-perfusion mismatch area (r = 0.67, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Denerved residual viable myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy as observed with innervation-perfusion PET is related to the heterogenic scar zone as assessed with LGE CMR.

The role of nuclear cardiac imaging in risk stratification of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents a significant portion of all cardiac deaths. Current guidelines focus mainly on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as the main criterion for SCD risk stratification and management. However, LVEF alone lacks both sensitivity and specificity in stratifying patients. Recent research has provided interesting data which supports a greater role for advanced cardiac imaging in risk stratification and patient management. In this article, we will focus on nuclear cardiac imaging, including left ventricular function assessment, myocardial perfusion imaging, myocardial blood flow quantification, metabolic imaging, and neurohormonal imaging. We will discuss how these can be used to better understand SCD and better stratify patient with both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Principles and techniques of imaging in identifying the substrate of ventricular arrhythmia

Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a major cause of death in patients with cardiomyopathy. To date, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction remains the primary criterion for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death. In recent years, however, advanced imaging techniques such as nuclear imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography have allowed for a more detailed evaluation of the underlying substrate of VA. These imaging modalities have emerged as a promising approach to assess the risk of sudden cardiac death. In addition, non-invasive identification of the critical sites of arrhythmias may guide ablation therapy. Typical anatomical substrates that can be evaluated by multiple advanced imaging techniques include perfusion abnormalities, scar and its border zone, and sympathetic denervation. Understanding the principles and techniques of different imaging modalities is essential to gain more insight in their role in identifying the arrhythmic substrate. The current review describes the principles of currently available imaging techniques to identify the substrate of VA.

Non-invasive imaging to identify susceptibility for ventricular arrhythmias in ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Non-invasive imaging of myocardial perfusion, sympathetic denervation and scar size contribute to enhanced risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Some of these imaging parameters, however, may be intertwined as they are based on similar pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive role of myocardial perfusion, sympathetic denervation and scar size on the inducibility of VA in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy in a head-to-head fashion.

METHODS

52 patients with ischaemic heart disease and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, were included. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular MRI was performed to assess LV volumes, function and scar size. Using [(15)O]H2O and [(11)C]hydroxyephedrine positron emission tomography, both resting and hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF), and sympathetic innervation were assessed. After ICD implantation, an electrophysiological study (EPS) was performed and was considered positive in case of sustained VA.

RESULTS

Patients with a positive EPS (n=25) showed more severely impaired global hyperaemic MBF (p=0.003), larger sympathetic denervation size (p=0.048) and tended to have larger scar size (p=0.07) and perfusion defect size (p=0.06) compared with EPS-negative patients (n=27). No differences were observed in LV volumes, LVEF and innervation-perfusion mismatch size. Multivariable analysis revealed that impaired hyperaemic MBF was the single best independent predictor for VA inducibility (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94, p=0.007). A combination of risk markers did not yield incremental predictive value over hyperaemic MBF alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all previously validated approaches to evaluate the arrhythmic substrate, global impaired hyperaemic MBF was the only independent predictor of VA inducibility. Moreover, a combined approach of different imaging variables did not have incremental value.

Quantification of coronary flow reserve in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and its association with clinical outcomes

AIMS

Patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction frequently show abnormal coronary vascular function, even in the absence of overt coronary artery disease. Moreover, the severity of vascular dysfunction might be related to the aetiology of cardiomyopathy.We sought to determine the incremental value of assessing coronary vascular dysfunction among patients with ischaemic (ICM) and non-ischaemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy at risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Coronary flow reserve (CFR, stress/rest myocardial blood flow) was quantified in 510 consecutive patients with rest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% referred for rest/stress myocardial perfusion PET imaging. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, heart failure hospitalization, late revascularization, and aborted sudden cardiac death.Median follow-up was 8.2 months. Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for clinical variables. The annualized MACE rate was 26.3%. Patients in the lowest two tertiles of CFR (CFR ≤ 1.65) experienced higher MACE rates than those in the highest tertile (32.6 vs. 15.5% per year, respectively, P = 0.004), irrespective of aetiology of cardiomyopathy.

CONCLUSION

Impaired coronary vascular function, as assessed by reduced CFR by PET imaging, is common in patients with both ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and is associated with MACE.

Sympathetic denervation is associated with microvascular dysfunction in non-infarcted myocardium in patients with cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Sympathetic denervation typically occurs in the infarcted myocardium and is associated with sudden cardiac death. Impaired innervation was also demonstrated in non-infarcted myocardium in ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy (ICMP and DCMP). Factors affecting sympathetic nerve integrity in remote myocardium are unknown. Perfusion abnormalities, even in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease, may relate to sympathetic dysfunction. This study was aimed to assess the interrelations of myocardial blood flow (MBF), contractile function, and sympathetic innervation in non-infarcted remote myocardium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy patients with ICMP or DCMP and LVEF ≤35% were included. [(15)O]H2O- and [(11)C]hydroxyephedrine (HED) PET was performed to quantify resting MBF, hyperaemic MBF, and sympathetic innervation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed to assess left ventricular function, mass, wall thickening, and scar size. Wall thickening, [(11)C]HED retention index (RI), and MBF were assessed in remote segments without scar, selected on CMR. [(11)C]HED RI was correlated with resting MBF (r = 0.41, P < 0.001) and hyperaemic MBF (r = 0.55, P < 0.001) in remote myocardium in both ICMP and DCMP. In addition, LV volumes (r = -0.40, P = 0.001), LV mass (r = -0.31, P = 0.008), and wall thickening (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) correlated with remote [(11)C]HED RI. Multivariable analysis revealed that hyperaemic MBF (B = 0.79, P < 0.001), wall thickening (B = 0.01, P = 0.03), and LVEDV (B = -0.03, P = 0.02) were independent predictors for remote [(11)C]HED RI.

CONCLUSION

Hyperaemic MBF is independently associated with sympathetic innervation in non-infarcted remote myocardium in patients with ICMP and DCMP. This suggests that microvascular dysfunction might be an important factor related to sympathetic nerve integrity. Whether impaired hyperaemic MBF is the primary cause of this relation remains unclear.