1
|
Pontone G, Rossi A, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Conte E, Fusini L, Gebhard C, Rabbat MG, Guaricci A, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, Mushtaq S, Al-Mallah MH, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Chinnaiyan K, Choi JH, Chun EJ, de Araújo Gonçalves P, Gottlieb I, Hadamitzky M, Kim YJ, Lee BK, Lee SE, Maffei E, Marques H, Samady H, Shin S, Sung JM, van Rosendael A, Virmani R, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Lin FY, Min JK, Narula J, Shaw LJ, Chang HJ. Progression of non-obstructive coronary plaque: a practical CCTA-based risk score from the PARADIGM registry. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:2665-2676. [PMID: 37750979 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09880-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES No clear recommendations are endorsed by the different scientific societies on the clinical use of repeat coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to develop and validate a practical CCTA risk score to predict medium-term disease progression in patients at a low-to-intermediate probability of CAD. METHODS Patients were part of the Progression of AtheRosclerotic PlAque Determined by Computed Tomographic Angiography Imaging (PARADIGM) registry. Specifically, 370 (derivation cohort) and 219 (validation cohort) patients with two repeat, clinically indicated CCTA scans, non-obstructive CAD, and absence of high-risk plaque (≥ 2 high-risk features) at baseline CCTA were included. Disease progression was defined as the new occurrence of ≥ 50% stenosis and/or high-risk plaque at follow-up CCTA. RESULTS In the derivation cohort, 104 (28%) patients experienced disease progression. The median time interval between the two CCTAs was 3.3 years (2.7-4.8). Odds ratios for disease progression derived from multivariable logistic regression were as follows: 4.59 (95% confidence interval: 1.69-12.48) for the number of plaques with spotty calcification, 3.73 (1.46-9.52) for the number of plaques with low attenuation component, 2.71 (1.62-4.50) for 25-49% stenosis severity, 1.47 (1.17-1.84) for the number of bifurcation plaques, and 1.21 (1.02-1.42) for the time between the two CCTAs. The C-statistics of the model were 0.732 (0.676-0.788) and 0.668 (0.583-0.752) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The new CCTA-based risk score is a simple and practical tool that can predict mid-term CAD progression in patients with known non-obstructive CAD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The clinical implementation of this new CCTA-based risk score can help promote the management of patients with non-obstructive coronary disease in terms of timing of imaging follow-up and therapeutic strategies. KEY POINTS • No recommendations are available on the use of repeat CCTA in patients with non-obstructive CAD. • This new CCTA score predicts mid-term CAD progression in patients with non-obstructive stenosis at baseline. • This new CCTA score can help guide the clinical management of patients with non-obstructive CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Pontone
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alexia Rossi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Baggiano
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Andreini
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Conte
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Fusini
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chaterine Gebhard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mark G Rabbat
- Division of Cardiology, Loyola University Chicago, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea Guaricci
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, University Hospital Policlinico of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Guglielmo
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Muscogiuri
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Saima Mushtaq
- Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mouaz H Al-Mallah
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel S Berman
- Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew J Budoff
- Department of Medicine, Lundquist Institute at Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Eun Ju Chun
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, South Korea
| | - Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves
- Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, UNICA, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ilan Gottlieb
- Department of Radiology, Casa de Saude São Jose, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Martin Hadamitzky
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yong Jin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byoung Kwon Lee
- Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang-Eun Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- Yonsei‑Cedars‑Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Erica Maffei
- Department of Radiology, Area Vasta 1/ASUR, Marche, Urbino, Italy
| | - Hugo Marques
- Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, UNICA, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Habib Samady
- Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sanghoon Shin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Min Sung
- Yonsei‑Cedars‑Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Alexander van Rosendael
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Renu Virmani
- Department of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Jeroen J Bax
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Turku Heart Center, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Jonathon A Leipsic
- Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fay Y Lin
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jagat Narula
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, and Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hyuk-Jae Chang
- Yonsei‑Cedars‑Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Polomski EAS, Heemelaar JC, de Graaf MA, Krol ADG, Louwerens M, Stöger JL, van Dijkman PRM, Schalij MJ, Jukema JW, Antoni ML. Relation between Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Cardiovascular Events in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Matched Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5831. [PMID: 38136376 PMCID: PMC10742169 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thoracic radiotherapy is one of the corner stones of HL treatment, but it is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. As HL is often diagnosed at a young age, long-term follow-up including screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) is recommended. OBJECTIVES This study aims to evaluate the presence of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in relation to cardiovascular events in HL patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy compared to a non-cancer control group. METHODS Consecutive HL patients who underwent evaluation for asymptomatic CAD with coronary computed tomography angiography > 10 years after thoracic irradiation were included. The study population consisted of 97 HL patients matched to 97 non-cancer patients on gender, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and statin use. RESULTS Mean age during CT scan in the HL population was 45.5 ± 9.9 and in the non-cancer population 45.5 ± 10.3 years. CACS was elevated (defined as >0) in 49 (50.5%) HL patients and 30 (30.9%) control patients. HL survivors had an odds ratio of 2.28 [95% CI: 1.22-4.28] for having a CACS > 0 compared to the matched population (p = 0.006). Prevalence of CACS > 90th percentile differed significantly: 17.1% in HL survivors vs. 4.6% in the matched population (p = 0.009). Non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis was more prevalent in the HL population than in the control population (45.7% vs. 28.4%, respectively, p = 0.01). During follow-up of 8.5 [5.3; 9.9] years, nine HL patients experienced an event including two patients with a CACS of zero. No events occurred in the control population. CONCLUSION In a matched study population, HL survivors have a higher prevalence of a CACS > 0 and an increased risk of cardiovascular events after thoracic irradiation compared to a matched non-cancer control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa A. S. Polomski
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Julius C. Heemelaar
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel A. de Graaf
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Augustinus D. G. Krol
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Louwerens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J. Lauran Stöger
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Paul R. M. van Dijkman
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J. Schalij
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J. Wouter Jukema
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Heart Institute, 3511 EP Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Louisa Antoni
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang J, Dou G, Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Jacobs BE, Schoepf UJ, Chen Y. Progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and relationship with adverse cardiovascular event in asymptomatic diabetic patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2019; 19:39. [PMID: 30744612 PMCID: PMC6371483 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1016-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The heterogeneity of risk in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is acknowledged in new guidelines promulgating different treatment recommendations for diabetics at low cardiac risk. We performed a retrospective longitudinal follow-up study to evaluate coronary plaque progression and its impact on cardiac events in asymptomatic diabetic patients. METHODS Data of 197 asymptomatic patients (63.1 ± 17 years, 60% males) with DM and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent clinically indicated dual-source cardiac computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with DM received standard of care treatment. Patients were classified into two groups based on CT coronary artery calcium scores (CACS): A, CACS> 10; B, CACS≤10. Progression of coronary plaque burden in both groups was evaluated and compared by baseline and follow-up coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using semi-automated plaque analysis and quantification software. Follow-up data were retrospectively gathered from medical records and endpoints of cardiac events were recorded via prospective phone-calls. The impacts of plaque composition and progression on cardiac events were specifically assessed. RESULTS Patients with CACS> 10 showed an increase in dense coronary calcium volume, while patients with CACS≤10 had a more pronounced increase in the volume of low-attenuation "lipid-rich" plaque components between CCTA acquisitions. The composite endpoint occurred in 20 patients (10.2%) after a median follow-up period of 41.8 months. Furthermore, at follow-up CCTA, the presence of CACS> 10 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.701; 95% CI, 0.612-0.836), increase of dense calcium volume (OR, 0.860 95% CI, 0.771-0.960), and lipid volume (OR, 1.013; 95% CI, 1.007-1.020) were all independent predictors of cardiac events. CONCLUSION Asymptomatic patients with DM experienced plaque progression as well as progression to "overt or silent CAD". The relative increase in plaque volume was associated with subsequent cardiac events, and the coronary calcification seemed to be inversely related to the outcome in asymptomatic diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjie Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,Master Program of Medical Science and Clinical Investigation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Guanhua Dou
- Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Christian Tesche
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich- Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | - Carlo N De Cecco
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brian E Jacobs
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - U Joseph Schoepf
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Yundai Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumamaru KK, Machitori A, Koba R, Ijichi S, Nakajima Y, Aoki S. Global and Japanese regional variations in radiologist potential workload for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Jpn J Radiol 2018; 36:273-281. [PMID: 29453512 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0724-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the global variation in radiologist potential workload for CT and MRI examinations, and the regional variation in potential workload and extent of radiologists' involvement in CT and MRI examinations in Japan. METHODS "Radiologist potential workload" was defined as the annual number of CT plus MRI examinations divided by the total number of diagnostic radiologists. The extent of radiologists' involvement was measured as the proportion of CT and MRI examinations to which "Added-fees for Radiological Managements on Imaging-studies (ARMIs)" were applied among eligible examinations. Maximum variation was computed as the ratio of the highest-to-lowest values among the countries or Japanese prefectures. RESULTS The radiologist potential workload in Japan was 2.78-4.17 times higher than those in other countries. A maximum prefecture-to-prefecture variation was 3.88. The average percentage of CT plus MRI examinations with ARMI applied was 43.3%, with a maximum prefecture-to-prefecture variation of 3.97. Prefectures with more radiologists tended to have a higher extent of radiologists' involvement. CONCLUSIONS Japan had a far greater radiologist potential workload compared with other countries, with a large regional variation among prefectures. Prefectures with more radiologists tended to have a higher extent of radiologists' involvement in CT and MRI examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanako K Kumamaru
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
| | - Akihiro Machitori
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Kohnodai Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ritsuko Koba
- Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.,GE Healthcare Japan Corporation, 4-7-127 Asahigaoka, Hino-shi, Tokyo, 191-8503, Japan
| | - Shinpei Ijichi
- GE Healthcare Japan Corporation, 4-7-127 Asahigaoka, Hino-shi, Tokyo, 191-8503, Japan
| | - Yasuo Nakajima
- Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Shigeki Aoki
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| |
Collapse
|