1
|
Gaudino MFL, An KR, Calhoon J. Mechanisms for the Superiority of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Complex Coronary Artery Disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 115:1333-1336. [PMID: 36587780 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario F L Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | - Kevin R An
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Calhoon
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smilowitz NR, Carey EP, Shah B, Hartigan PM, Plomondon ME, Maron DJ, Maddox TM, Spertus JA, Mancini GBJ, Chaitman BR, Weintraub WS, Sedlis SP, Boden WE. Comparison of Characteristics and Outcomes of Veterans With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Enrolled in the COURAGE Trial Versus the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. Am J Cardiol 2022; 180:1-9. [PMID: 35918234 PMCID: PMC10019948 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials have not demonstrated a survival benefit with percutaneous coronary intervention in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). We evaluated the generalizability of the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial findings to the broader population of veterans with SIHD. Veterans who underwent coronary angiography between 2005 and 2013 for SIHD were identified from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking Program (VA CART). Patient-level comparisons were made between patients from VA CART who met the eligibility criteria for COURAGE and veterans enrolled in COURAGE between 1999 and 2004. All-cause mortality over long-term follow-up was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. COURAGE-eligible patients from VA CART (n = 59,758) were older, had a higher body mass index, a greater prevalence of co-morbidities, but fewer diseased vessels on index coronary angiography, and were less likely to be on optimal medical therapy at baseline and on 1-year follow-up compared with VA COURAGE participants (n = 968). Patients from VA CART (median follow-up 6.5 years) had higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.98 [1.61 to 2.43]) than participants from VA COURAGE (median follow-up: 4.6 years). Risks of mortality were greater in the 56.4% patients from CART who were medically managed (aHR 1.94 [1.49 to 2.53]) and in the 43.6% who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (aHR 1.99 [1.45 to 2.74]), compared with their respective VA COURAGE arms. In conclusion, in this noncontemporaneous patient-level analysis, veterans in the randomized COURAGE trial had more favorable outcomes than the population of veterans with SIHD at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel R Smilowitz
- Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine, VA New York Healthcare Network, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Evan P Carey
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Binita Shah
- Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine, VA New York Healthcare Network, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York.
| | | | - Mary E Plomondon
- CART Program, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - David J Maron
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Thomas M Maddox
- Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - John A Spertus
- Mid-America Heart Institute, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - G B John Mancini
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, British Canada, Canada
| | | | - William S Weintraub
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Steven P Sedlis
- Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine, VA New York Healthcare Network, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Piccolo R, Bonaa KH, Efthimiou O, Varenne O, Baldo A, Urban P, Kaiser C, de Belder A, Lemos PA, Wilsgaard T, Reifart J, Ribeiro EE, Serruys PW, Byrne RA, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Esposito G, Wijns W, Jüni P, Windecker S, Valgimigli M. Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Drug-eluting Versus Bare-metal Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Versus Acute Coronary Syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2022; 182:8-16. [PMID: 36075755 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) strongly reduce restenosis and repeat revascularization compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) for percutaneous coronary intervention. There is residual uncertainty as to whether other prognostically relevant outcomes are affected by DES versus BMS concerning initial presentation (chronic coronary syndrome [CCS] vs acute coronary syndrome [ACS]). We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing new-generation DES versus BMS (CRD42017060520). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). Outcomes were examined at maximum follow-up and with a 1-year landmark. Risk estimates are expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 22,319 patients were included across 14 trials; 7,691 patients (34.5%) with CCS and 14,628 patients (65.5%) with ACS. We found evidence that new-generation DES versus BMS consistently reduced the risk of cardiac death or MI in both patients with CCS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98, p <0.001) and ACS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.92, p <0.001) (p-interaction = 0.931). This benefit was mainly driven by a similar reduction in the risk of MI (p-interaction = 0.898) for both subsets (HRCCS 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.97; HRACS 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89). In CCS and ACS, we found a time-dependent treatment effect, with the benefit from DES accumulating during 1-year follow-up, without offsetting effects after that. In conclusion, patients with CCS were slightly underrepresented in comparative clinical trials. Still, they benefited similarly to patients with ACS from new-generation DES instead of BMS with a sustained reduction of cardiac death or MI because of lower event rates within 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Piccolo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Kaare H Bonaa
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Orestis Efthimiou
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Varenne
- Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Baldo
- Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Christoph Kaiser
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adam de Belder
- Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Pedro A Lemos
- Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil and Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tom Wilsgaard
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jörg Reifart
- Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | | | - Patrick Wjc Serruys
- International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert A Byrne
- Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, both Munich, Germany
| | | | - Giovanni Esposito
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - William Wijns
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Peter Jüni
- Applied Health Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Valgimigli
- Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France; Instituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Munnur RK, Cheng K, Laggoune J, Talman A, Muthalaly R, Nerlekar N, Baey YW, Nogic J, Lin A, Cameron JD, Seneviratne S, Wong DTL. Quantitative plaque characterisation and association with acute coronary syndrome on medium to long term follow up: insights from computed tomography coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2022; 12:415-425. [PMID: 36033222 PMCID: PMC9412217 DOI: 10.21037/cdt-21-763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is an established imaging modality widely used for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis with expanding potential for comprehensive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Lesion-based analyses of high-risk plaques (HRP) on CTCA may aid further in prognostication presenting with stable chest pain. We conduct qualitative and quantitative assessments to identify HRPs that are associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on a medium to long term follow-up. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent CTCA for suspected CAD. Obstructive stenosis (OS) is defined as ≥50% and the presence of HRP and its constituents: positive-remodelling (PR), low-attenuation-plaque (LAP; <56 HU), very-low-attenuation-plaque (vLAP; <30 HU) and spotty-calcification (SC) were recorded. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of HRP was performed at the site of minimum-luminal-area (MLA). The primary endpoint was fatal or non-fatal ACS on follow-up. Results A total of 1,257 patients were included (mean age 61±14 years old and 51% male) with a median follow-up of 7.24 years (interquartile range 5.5 to 7.7 years). The occurrence of ACS was significantly higher in HRP (+) patients compared to HRP (−) patients and patients with no plaques (20.5% vs. 1.6% vs. 0.4%, log-rank test P<0.001). ACS was more frequent in HRP (+)/OS (+) patients (20.7%) compared to HRP (+)/OS (−) patients (8.6%), HRP (−)/OS (+) patients (1.8%) and HRP (−)/OS (−) patients (1.0%). OS, cross-sectional plaque area (PA) and the presence of vLAP identified those HRP lesions that were more likely to cause future ACS. Cross-sectional LAP area (<56 HU) in HRP lesions added incremental prognostic value to OS in predicting ACS (P=0.008). Conclusions The presence of OS and the LAP area at the site of MLA identify the HRP lesions that have the greatest association with development of future ACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi K Munnur
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin Cheng
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jordan Laggoune
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Talman
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Rahul Muthalaly
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Nitesh Nerlekar
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Yi-Wei Baey
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jason Nogic
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Lin
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - James D Cameron
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Sujith Seneviratne
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Dennis T L Wong
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Monash Medical Centre) Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,South Australian Health Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anatomic and Flow Characteristics of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Angiographic Stenoses Predisposing to Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol 2021; 141:7-15. [PMID: 33220322 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The impact of the anatomic characteristics of coronary stenoses on the development of future coronary thrombosis has been controversial. This study aimed at identifying the anatomic and flow characteristics of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stenoses that predispose to myocardial infarction, by examining angiograms obtained before the index event. We identified 90 patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for whom coronary angiograms and their reconstruction in the three-dimensional space were available at 6 to 12 months before the STEMI, and at the revascularization procedure. The majority of culprit lesions responsible for STEMI occurred between 20 and 40 mm from the LAD ostium, whereas the majority of stable lesions not associated with STEMI were found in distances >60 mm (p < 0.001). Culprit lesions were significantly more stenosed (diameter stenosis 68.6 ± 14.2% vs 44.0 ± 10.4%, p < 0.001), and significantly longer than stable ones (15.3 ± 5.4 mm vs 9.2 ± 2.5 mm, p < 0.001). Bifurcations at culprit lesions were significantly more frequent (88.8%) compared with stable lesions (34.4%, p < 0.001). Computational fluid dynamics simulations demonstrated that hemodynamic conditions in the vicinity of culprit lesions promote coronary thrombosis due to flow recirculation. A multiple logistic regression model with diameter stenosis, lesion length, distance from the LAD ostium, distance from bifurcation, and lesion symmetry, showed excellent accuracy in predicting the development of a culprit lesion (AUC: 0.993 [95% CI: 0.969 to 1.000], p < 0.0001). In conclusion, specific anatomic and hemodynamic characteristics of LAD stenoses identified on coronary angiograms may assist risk stratification of patients by predicting sites of future myocardial infarction.
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanaka T, Miki K, Akahori H, Imanaka T, Yoshihara N, Kimura T, Yanaka K, Asakura M, Ishihara M. Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic disease burden between ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Non-culprit Gensini score and non-culprit SYNTAX score. Clin Cardiol 2020; 44:238-243. [PMID: 33368316 PMCID: PMC7852165 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have worse long‐term prognoses than those with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Hypothesis It may be attributable to more extended coronary atherosclerotic disease burden in patients with NSTEMI. Methods This study consisted of consecutive 231 patients who underwent coronary intervention for myocardial infarction (MI). To assess the extent and severity of atherosclerotic disease burden of non‐culprit coronary arteries, two scoring systems (Gensini score and synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery [SYNTAX] score) were modified by subtracting the score of the culprit lesion: the non‐culprit Gensini score and the non‐culprit SYNTAX score. Results Patients with NSTEMI had more multi‐vessel disease, initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2/3, and final TIMI flow grade 3 than those with STEMI. As compared to STEMI, patients with NSTEMI had significantly higher non‐culprit Gensini score (16.3 ± 19.8 vs. 31.2 ± 25.4, p < 0.001) and non‐culprit SYNTAX score (5.8 ± 7.0 vs. 11.1 ± 9.7, p < 0.001). Conclusions Patients with NSTEMI had more advanced coronary atherosclerotic disease burden including non‐obstruction lesions, which may at least in part explain higher incidence of cardiovascular events in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takamasa Tanaka
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kojiro Miki
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hirokuni Akahori
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Imanaka
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nagataka Yoshihara
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Toshio Kimura
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koji Yanaka
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masanori Asakura
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masaharu Ishihara
- Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gomes WJ. Left main coronary artery stenosis: Evidence and pathophysiology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 160:e179-e180. [PMID: 32680640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.05.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Walter J Gomes
- Cardiovascular Surgery Discipline, Escola Paulista de Medicina and São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Bittner DO, Emami H, Puchner SB, Lu MT, Meyersohn NM, Ivanov AV, Adami EC, Patel MR, Mark DB, Udelson JE, Lee KL, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U. Use of High-Risk Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Detection for Risk Stratification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 3:144-152. [PMID: 29322167 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 365] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Coronary computed tomographic angiography (coronary CTA) can characterize coronary artery disease, including high-risk plaque. A noninvasive method of identifying high-risk plaque before major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) could provide practice-changing optimizations in coronary artery disease care. Objective To determine whether high-risk plaque detected by coronary CTA was associated with incident MACE independently of significant stenosis (SS) and cardiovascular risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants This prespecified nested observational cohort study was part of the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial. All stable, symptomatic outpatients in this trial who required noninvasive cardiovascular testing and received coronary CTA were included and followed up for a median of 25 months. Exposures Core laboratory assessment of coronary CTA for SS and high-risk plaque (eg, positive remodeling, low computed tomographic attenuation, or napkin-ring sign). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was an adjudicated composite of MACE (defined as death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina). Results The study included 4415 patients, of whom 2296 (52%) were women, with a mean age of 60.5 years, a median atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score of 11, and a MACE rate of 3% (131 events). A total of 676 patients (15.3%) had high-risk plaques, and 276 (6.3%) had SS. The presence of high-risk plaque was associated with a higher MACE rate (6.4% vs 2.4%; hazard ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.89-3.93). This association persisted after adjustment for ASCVD risk score and SS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.62). Adding high-risk plaque to the ASCVD risk score and SS assessment led to a significant continuous net reclassification improvement (0.34; 95% CI, 0.02-0.51). Presence of high-risk plaque increased MACE risk among patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease relative to patients without high-risk plaque (aHR, 4.31 vs 2.64; 95% CI, 2.25-8.26 vs 1.49-4.69). There were no significant differences in MACE in patients with SS and high-risk plaque as opposed to those with SS but not high-risk plaque (aHR, 8.68 vs. 9.31; 95% CI, 4.25-17.73 vs 4.21-20.61). High-risk plaque was a stronger predictor of MACE in women (aHR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.25-4.64) vs men (aHR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.81-2.39) and younger patients (aHR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.20-4.51) vs older ones (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.77-2.39). Conclusions and Relevance High-risk plaque found by coronary CTA was associated with a future MACE in a large US population of outpatients with stable chest pain. High-risk plaque may be an additional risk stratification tool, especially in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease, younger patients, and women. The importance of findings is limited by low absolute MACE rates and low positive predictive value of high-risk plaque. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Indentifier: NCT01174550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maros Ferencik
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.,Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Thomas Mayrhofer
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.,School of Business Studies, Stralsund University of Applied Sciences, Stralsund, Germany
| | - Daniel O Bittner
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Hamed Emami
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Stefan B Puchner
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael T Lu
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Nandini M Meyersohn
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Alexander V Ivanov
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Elizabeth C Adami
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Manesh R Patel
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel B Mark
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James E Udelson
- Tufts University School of Medicine and the Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kerry L Lee
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Pamela S Douglas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Udo Hoffmann
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katritsis DG, Mark DB, Gersh BJ. Revascularization in stable coronary disease: evidence and uncertainties. Nat Rev Cardiol 2018; 15:408-419. [DOI: 10.1038/s41569-018-0006-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
10
|
Physiological Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10:2539-2547. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
11
|
Korosoglou G, Marwan M, Giusca S, Schmermund A, Schneider S, Bruder O, Hausleiter J, Schroeder S, Leber A, Limbourg T, Gitsioudis G, Rixe J, Zahn R, Katus HA, Achenbach S, Senges J. Influence of irregular heart rhythm on radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic impact of cardiac computed tomography angiography in 4,339 patients. Data from the German Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2017; 12:34-41. [PMID: 29195843 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2017] [Revised: 10/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) provides non-invasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with high precision for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). AIM To investigate whether irregular heart rhythm including atrial fibrillation and premature beats during data acquisition influences (i) radiation and contrast media exposure, (ii) number of non-evaluable coronary segments and (iii) diagnostic impact of coronary CTA. METHODS Twelve tertiary care centers with ≥64 slice CT scanners and ≥5 years of experience with cardiovascular imaging participated in this registry. Between 2009 and 2014, 4339 examinations were analysed in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary CTA for suspected CAD. Clinical and epidemiologic data were gathered from all patients. In addition, clinical presentation, heart rate and rhythm during the scan, Agatston score, radiation and contrast media exposure and the diagnostic impact of coronary CTA were systematically analysed. RESULTS Of 4339 patients in total, 260 (6.0%) had irregular heart rhythm, whereas the remaining 4079 (94.0%) had stable sinus rhythm. Patients with irregular heart rhythm were older (63.2 ± 12.5yrs versus 58.6 ± 11.4yrs. p < 0.001), exhibited a higher rate of pathologic stress tests before CTA (37.1% versus 26.1%, p < 0.01) and higher heart rates during CTA compared to those with sinus rhythm (62.5 ± 11.6bpm versus 58.9 ± 8.5bpm, p < 0.001). Both contrast media exposure and radiation exposure were significantly higher in patients with irregular heart rhythm (90 mL (95%CI = 80-110 mL) versus 80 mL (95%CI = 70-90 mL) and 6.2 mSv (95%CI = 2.5-11.7) versus 3.3 mSv (95%CI = 1.7-6.9), p < 0.001 for both). Coronary CTA excluded significant CAD less frequently in patients with irregular heart rhythm (32.9% versus 44.8%, p < 0.001). This was attributed to the higher rate of examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary segment in patients with irregular heart rhythm (10.8% versus 4.6%, p < 0.001). Subsequent invasive angiography could be avoided in 47.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm compared to 52.9% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS), whereas downstream stress testing was recommended in 3.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm versus 4.0% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS). CONCLUSION A significant number of patients scheduled for coronary CTA have irregular heart rhythm in a real-world clinical setting. In such patients, heart rate during coronary CTA is higher, possibly resulting in (i) higher radiation and contrast agent exposure and (ii) more frequent coronary CTA examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary artery segment. However, this does not seem to lead to increased downstream stress testing or subsequent invasive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigorios Korosoglou
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany..
| | - Mohamed Marwan
- Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sorin Giusca
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany
| | - Axel Schmermund
- Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (CCB), Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | | | | | - Jörg Hausleiter
- Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilian's University, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephen Schroeder
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Alb Fils Clinics, Geislingen, Germany
| | | | - Tobias Limbourg
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Gitsios Gitsioudis
- Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Rixe
- Department of Cardiology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ralf Zahn
- Department of Cardiology, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Hugo A Katus
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jochen Senges
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ujueta F, Weiss EN, Shah B, Sedlis SP. Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2017; 19:17. [PMID: 28213668 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0821-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This study aims to determine if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does improve survival in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). RECENT FINDINGS The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial will evaluate patients with moderate to severe ischemia and will be the largest randomized trial of an initial management strategy of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) versus optimal medical therapy alone for SIHD. Although the ISCHEMIA trial may show a benefit with upfront coronary revascularization in this high-risk population, cardiac events after PCI are largely caused by plaque rupture in segments outside of the original stented segment. Furthermore, given the robust data from prior randomized trials, which showed no survival benefit with PCI, and the likelihood that the highest risk patients in ISCHEMIA will be treated with surgery, it is unlikely that the ISCHEMIA trial will show a survival benefit particular to PCI. RECENT FINDINGS Although PCI relieves symptoms, the evidence base indicates that it does not prolong survival in SIHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Ujueta
- Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology New York VA Healthcare Network and New York University School of Medicine, 423 East 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Ephraim N Weiss
- Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology New York VA Healthcare Network and New York University School of Medicine, 423 East 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Binita Shah
- Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology New York VA Healthcare Network and New York University School of Medicine, 423 East 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Steven P Sedlis
- Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology New York VA Healthcare Network and New York University School of Medicine, 423 East 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bellamkonda K, Williams M, Handa A, Lee R. Flow Mediated Dilatation as a Biomarker in Vascular Surgery Research. J Atheroscler Thromb 2017; 24:779-787. [PMID: 28674324 PMCID: PMC5556184 DOI: 10.5551/jat.40964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Endothelial dysfunction is one of the hallmarks of atherogenesis, and correlates with many cardiovascular risk factors. One of the features of endothelial dysfunction is the loss of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, resulting in derangements in the vasodilatory response of the vessel wall. Flow mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery is an accepted method for non-invasive assessment of systemic endothelial function. FMD is examined extensively in the context of cardiovascular research, and has been utilised as a routine assessment in large cohorts such as the Framingham Heart Study, Young Finns Study, and Gutenberg Heart Study. However, FMD is less known in the context of vascular surgery research, despite the similarities between the underpinning disease mechanisms. This review will provide a summary of FMD in terms of its history of development and the conduct of the test in research settings. It will further highlight the key literature of FMD as a biomarker for vascular surgeons, particularly in the context of abdominal aortic aneurysms and lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ashok Handa
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford
| | - Regent Lee
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, Picard MH, Truong QA, Patel MR, Huang M, Pencina M, Mark DB, Heitner JF, Fordyce CB, Pellikka PA, Tardif JC, Budoff M, Nahhas G, Chow B, Kosinski AS, Lee KL, Douglas PS. Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation 2017; 135:2320-2332. [PMID: 28389572 PMCID: PMC5946057 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.024360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 320] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal management of patients with stable chest pain relies on the prognostic information provided by noninvasive cardiovascular testing, but there are limited data from randomized trials comparing anatomic with functional testing. METHODS In the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), patients with stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were randomly assigned to functional testing (exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress, or stress echocardiography) or coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Site-based diagnostic test reports were classified as normal or mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal. The primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina hospitalizations over a median follow-up of 26.1 months. RESULTS Both the prevalence of normal test results and incidence rate of events in these patients were significantly lower among 4500 patients randomly assigned to CTA in comparison with 4602 patients randomly assigned to functional testing (33.4% versus 78.0%, and 0.9% versus 2.1%, respectively; both P<0.001). In CTA, 54.0% of events (n=74/137) occurred in patients with nonobstructive CAD (1%-69% stenosis). Prevalence of obstructive CAD and myocardial ischemia was low (11.9% versus 12.7%, respectively), with both findings having similar prognostic value (hazard ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.60-5.39; and 3.47; 95% CI, 2.42-4.99). When test findings were stratified as mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal, hazard ratios for events in comparison with normal tests increased proportionally for CTA (2.94, 7.67, 10.13; all P<0.001) but not for corresponding functional testing categories (0.94 [P=0.87], 2.65 [P=0.001], 3.88 [P<0.001]). The discriminatory ability of CTA in predicting events was significantly better than functional testing (c-index, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.68-0.76 versus 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69; P=0.04). If 2714 patients with at least an intermediate Framingham Risk Score (>10%) who had a normal functional test were reclassified as being mildly abnormal, the discriminatory capacity improved to 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.74). CONCLUSIONS Coronary CTA, by identifying patients at risk because of nonobstructive CAD, provides better prognostic information than functional testing in contemporary patients who have stable chest pain with a low burden of obstructive CAD, myocardial ischemia, and events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01174550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udo Hoffmann
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.).
| | - Maros Ferencik
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - James E Udelson
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Michael H Picard
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Quynh A Truong
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Manesh R Patel
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Megan Huang
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Michael Pencina
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Daniel B Mark
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - John F Heitner
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Christopher B Fordyce
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Patricia A Pellikka
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Jean-Claude Tardif
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Matthew Budoff
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - George Nahhas
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Benjamin Chow
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Andrzej S Kosinski
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Kerry L Lee
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| | - Pamela S Douglas
- From Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.H., M.H.P.); Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (M.F.); Tufts University School of Medicine and the CardioVascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.E.U.); Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.R.P., M.H., M.P., D.B.M., C.B.F., A.S.K., K.L.L., P.S.D.); Cardiovascular Research, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn (J.F.H.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.A.P.); Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Canada (J.-C.T.); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA (M.B.); Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital-Dearborn, MI (G.N.); and Department of Medicine, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (B.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee R, Bellamkonda K, Jones A, Killough N, Woodgate F, Williams M, Cassimjee I, Handa A. Flow Mediated Dilatation and Progression of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 53:820-829. [PMID: 28416190 PMCID: PMC5496669 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND Biomarker(s) for prediction of the future progression rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) may be useful to stratify the management of individual patients. AAAs are associated with features of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Flow mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery is a recognised non-invasive measurement for endothelial function. We hypothesised that FMD is a potential biomarker of AAA progression and reflects the temporal changes of endothelial function during AAA progression. METHODS In a prospectively recruited cohort of patients with AAAs (Oxford Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Study), AAA size was recorded by antero-posterior diameter (APD) (outer to outer) on ultrasound. Annual AAA progression was calculated by (ΔAPD/APD at baseline)/(number of days lapsed/365 days). FMD was assessed at the same time as AAA size measurement. Analyses of data were performed in the overall cohort, and further in subgroups of AAA by size (small: 30-39 mm; moderate: 40-55 mm; large: > 55 mm). RESULTS FMD is inversely correlated with the diameter of AAAs in all patients (n=162, Spearman's r=-.28, p<.001). FMD is inversely correlated with AAA diameter progression in the future 12 months (Spearman's r=-.35, p=.001), particularly in the moderate size group. Furthermore, FMD deteriorates during the course of AAA surveillance (from a median of 2.0% at baseline to 1.2% at follow-up; p=.004), while surgical repair of AAAs (n=50 [open repair n=22, endovascular repair n=28)] leads to an improvement in FMD (from 1.1% pre-operatively to 3.8% post-operatively; p<.001), irrespective of the type of surgery. CONCLUSION FMD is inversely correlated with future AAA progression in humans. FMD deteriorates during the natural history of AAA, and is improved by surgery. The utility of FMD as a potential biomarker in the context of AAA warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lee
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - K Bellamkonda
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A Jones
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N Killough
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - F Woodgate
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Williams
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - I Cassimjee
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A Handa
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Camargo GC, Rothstein T, Derenne ME, Sabioni L, Lima JAC, Lima RDSL, Gottlieb I. Factors Associated With Coronary Artery Disease Progression Assessed By Serial Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Arq Bras Cardiol 2017; 108:396-404. [PMID: 28492738 PMCID: PMC5444885 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) allows for noninvasive coronary artery disease (CAD) phenotyping. Factors related to CAD progression are epidemiologically valuable. Objective To identify factors associated with CAD progression in patients undergoing sequential CCTA testing. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 384 consecutive patients who had at least two CCTA studies between December 2005 and March 2013. Due to limitations in the quantification of CAD progression, we excluded patients who had undergone surgical revascularization previously or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between studies. CAD progression was defined as any increase in the adapted segment stenosis score (calculated using the number of diseased segments and stenosis severity) in all coronary segments without stent (in-stent restenosis was excluded from the analysis). Stepwise logistic regression was used to assess variables associated with CAD progression. Results From a final population of 234 patients, a total of 117 (50%) had CAD progression. In a model accounting for major CAD risk factors and other baseline characteristics, only age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.01-1.07), interstudy interval (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.04), and past PCI (OR 3.66, 95%CI 1.77-7.55) showed an independent relationship with CAD progression. Conclusions A history of PCI with stent placement was independently associated with a 3.7-fold increase in the odds of CAD progression, excluding in-stent restenosis. Age and interstudy interval were also independent predictors of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tamara Rothstein
- Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagem CDPI, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Leticia Sabioni
- Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagem CDPI, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima
- Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagem CDPI, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ); Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil
| | - Ilan Gottlieb
- Casa de Saúde São José; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.,Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sedlis SP, Lorin JD. Should Fractional Flow Reserve Be Measured After Stent Deployment? Routinely? Ever? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10:996-998. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
18
|
Medical Treatment and Revascularization Options in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68:985-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Revised: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
19
|
Puri R, Madder RD, Madden SP, Sum ST, Wolski K, Muller JE, Andrews J, King KL, Kataoka Y, Uno K, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, Nissen SE, Virmani R, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Nicholls SJ. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Enhances Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Vulnerable Coronary Plaque: A Combined Pathological and In Vivo Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015; 35:2423-31. [PMID: 26338299 DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.115.306118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pathological studies demonstrate the dual significance of plaque burden (PB) and lipid composition for mediating coronary plaque vulnerability. We evaluated relationships between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived PB and arterial remodeling with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived lipid content in ex vivo and in vivo human coronary arteries. APPROACH AND RESULTS Ex vivo coronary NIRS and IVUS imaging was performed through blood in 116 coronary arteries of 51 autopsied hearts, followed by 2-mm block sectioning (n=2070) and histological grading according to modified American Heart Association criteria. Lesions were defined as the most heavily diseased 2-mm block per imaged artery on IVUS. IVUS-derived PB and NIRS-derived lipid core burden index (LCBI) of each block and lesion were analyzed. Block-level analysis demonstrated significant trends of increasing PB and LCBI across more complex atheroma (Ptrend <0.001 for both LCBI and PB). Lesion-based analyses demonstrated the highest LCBI and remodeling index within coronary fibroatheroma (Ptrend <0.001 and 0.02 versus all plaque groups, respectively). Prediction models demonstrated similar abilities of PB, LCBI, and remodeling index for discriminating fibroatheroma (c indices: 0.675, 0.712, and 0.672, respectively). A combined PB+LCBI analysis significantly improved fibroatheroma detection accuracy (c index 0.77, P=0.028 versus PB; net-reclassification index 43%, P=0.003), whereas further adding remodeling index did not (c index 0.80, P=0.27 versus PB+LCBI). In vivo comparisons of 43 age- and sex-matched patients (to the autopsy cohort) undergoing combined NIRS-IVUS coronary imaging yielded similar associations to those demonstrated ex vivo. CONCLUSIONS Adding NIRS to conventional IVUS-derived PB imaging significantly improves the ability to detect more active, potentially vulnerable coronary atheroma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Puri
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Ryan D Madder
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Sean P Madden
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Stephen T Sum
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Kathy Wolski
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - James E Muller
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Jordan Andrews
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Karilane L King
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Yu Kataoka
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Kiyoko Uno
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - E Murat Tuzcu
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Steven E Nissen
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Renu Virmani
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Akiko Maehara
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Gary S Mintz
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.)
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- From the Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5R) (R.P., K.W., K.L.K., K.U., S.E.N.), and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.P., S.R.K., E.M.T., S.E.N.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia (R.P., S.J.N.); Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI (R.D.M.); InfraRedX Inc., Burlington, MA (S.P.M., S.T.S., J.E.M.); South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia (J.A., Y.K., S.J.N.); CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, MD (R.V.); and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.M., G.S.M.).
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liang M, Kajiya T, Chan MY, Tay E, Lee CH, Richards AM, Low AF, Tan HC. High-grade culprit lesions are a common cause of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Singapore Med J 2015; 56:334-8. [PMID: 26106241 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2015092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conventional knowledge holds that the majority of ruptured atherosclerotic plaques causing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are found in moderate stenoses that produce < 50% loss of arterial diameter. This study aimed to analyse the culprit lesions in patients who presented with STEMI and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) at our institution. METHODS Patients who underwent PPCI between June 2008 and August 2010 at our institution were included in the analysis. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed for the culprit lesions immediately after antegrade flow was restored by thrombectomy, low-profile balloon predilatation or guidewire crossing. RESULTS A total of 1,021 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 57 ± 12 years and 85.2% were male. Lesion measurement was done after coronary flow was restored by thrombectomy (73.1%), balloon dilatation (24.1%) and following guidewire passage across the lesion (2.8%). Mean minimal luminal diameter was 1.1 ± 0.5 mm, mean reference vessel diameter was 2.8 ± 0.6 mm, mean diameter stenosis was 61 ± 16% and mean lesion length was 16 ± 6 mm. Most (80.2%) of the culprit lesions had diameter stenoses > 50% (p < 0.01). Although balloon angioplasty was performed in 24.1% of the patients, the majority (64.2%) still had diameter stenoses > 50%. High-grade stenoses (> 50%) were more frequently observed in male patients (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Contrary to the existing paradigm, we found that most of the patients with STEMI in our institution had culprit lesions with diameter stenosis > 50%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Liang
- National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Mark Y Chan
- National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Edgar Tay
- National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chi-Hang Lee
- National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Adrian F Low
- National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the Various Coronary Artery Disease Syndromes. Coron Artery Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2828-1_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
22
|
Evaluation of the stable coronary artery disease patient: Anatomy trumps physiology. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2014; 24:332-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2014.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2014] [Revised: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 08/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Rade
- From the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mancini GJ, Gosselin G, Chow B, Kostuk W, Stone J, Yvorchuk KJ, Abramson BL, Cartier R, Huckell V, Tardif JC, Connelly K, Ducas J, Farkouh ME, Gupta M, Juneau M, O’Neill B, Raggi P, Teo K, Verma S, Zimmermann R. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30:837-49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
25
|
|
26
|
Moreno PR, Narula J. Thinking Outside the Lumen. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:1141-1144. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 07/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Tomey MI, Narula J, Kovacic JC. Advances in the Understanding of Plaque Composition and Treatment Options. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:1604-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2013] [Revised: 01/02/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
28
|
Puri R, Nicholls SJ, Ellis SG, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. High-Risk Coronary Atheroma. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:1134-1140. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2013] [Revised: 05/10/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
29
|
Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Bates ER, Maron DJ, Teo K, Sedlis SP, Chaitman BR, Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kostuk WJ, Dada M, Booth DC, Boden WE. Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): coronary anatomy versus ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7:195-201. [PMID: 24440015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2013] [Revised: 10/12/2013] [Accepted: 10/24/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the relative utility of anatomic and ischemic burden of coronary artery disease for predicting outcomes. BACKGROUND Both anatomic burden and ischemic burden of coronary artery disease determine patient prognosis and influence myocardial revascularization decisions. When both measures are available, their relative utility for prognostication and management choice is controversial. METHODS A total of 621 patients enrolled in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial with baseline quantitative nuclear single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and quantitative coronary angiography were studied. Several multiple regression models were constructed to determine independent predictors of the endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding periprocedural MI) and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Ischemic burden during stress SPECT, anatomic burden derived from angiography, left ventricular ejection fraction, and assignment to either optimal medical therapy (OMT) + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or OMT alone were analyzed. RESULTS In nonadjusted and adjusted regression models, anatomic burden and left ventricular ejection fraction were consistent predictors of death, MI, and NSTE-ACS, whereas ischemic burden and treatment assignment were not. There was a marginal (p = 0.03) effect of the interaction term of anatomic and ischemic burden for the prediction of clinical outcome, but separately or in combination, neither anatomy nor ischemia interacted with therapeutic strategy to predict outcome. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients treated with OMT, anatomic burden was a consistent predictor of death, MI, and NSTE-ACS, whereas ischemic burden was not. Importantly, neither determination, even in combination, identified a patient profile benefiting preferentially from an invasive therapeutic strategy. (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation [COURAGE]; NCT00007657).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B John Mancini
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Pamela M Hartigan
- Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Connecticut VA Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Daniel S Berman
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sean W Hayes
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric R Bates
- University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David J Maron
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Koon Teo
- McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven P Sedlis
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York Campus, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | - John A Spertus
- Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - William J Kostuk
- London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - William E Boden
- New York Health Care System, Buffalo General Hospital and the State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The great taboo of non-infarct-related artery revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2013; 166:611-3. [PMID: 24093838 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 06/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
31
|
|
32
|
Mancini GBJ, Hartigan PM, Bates ER, Chaitman BR, Sedlis SP, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, Spertus JA, Teo KK, Dada M, Knudtson M, Berman DS, Booth DC, Boden WE, Weintraub WS. Prognostic importance of coronary anatomy and left ventricular ejection fraction despite optimal therapy: assessment of residual risk in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation Trial. Am Heart J 2013; 166:481-7. [PMID: 24016497 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown if baseline angiographic findings can be used to estimate residual risk of patients with chronic stable angina treated with both optimal medical therapy (OMT) and protocol-assigned or symptom-driven percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS Death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hospitalization for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome were adjudicated in 2,275 COURAGE patients. The number of vessels diseased (VD) was defined as the number of major coronary arteries with ≥50% diameter stenosis. Proximal left anterior descending, either isolated or in combination with other disease, was also evaluated. Depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was defined as ≤50%. Cox regression analyses included these anatomical factors as well as interaction terms for initial treatment assignment (OMT or OMT + PCI). RESULTS Percutaneous coronary intervention and proximal left anterior descending did not influence any outcome. Death was predicted by low LVEF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.86, CI 1.34-2.59, P < .001) and VD (HR 1.45, CI 1.20-1.75, P < .001). Myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome were predicted only by VD (HR 1.53, CI 1.30-1.81 and HR 1.24, CI 1.06-1.44, P = .007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In spite of OMT and irrespective of protocol-assigned or clinically driven PCI, LVEF and angiographic burden of disease at baseline retain prognostic power and reflect residual risk for secondary ischemic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B John Mancini
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29:364-71. [PMID: 23333164 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Revised: 10/14/2012] [Accepted: 11/02/2012] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We studied the characteristics of low-density plaque (LDP) burden in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), using 64-slice computed tomography (CT) assessment. Though several CT plaque features such as positive remodelling, adjacent spotty calcification or the presence of LDP have been demonstrated to be associated with unstable plaques, it is still unknown whether their severity and extent present any differences between different types of ACS. METHODS In 45 subjects with ACS (22 unstable angina and 23 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]), 118 coronary plaques were evaluated using a CT multislice 64 assessment including the burden with atheroma having a CT density below 30, 60, or 100 Hounsfield units (HU), remodelling index and spotty calcification. RESULTS Culprit lesions tend to be larger in volume (111.11 mm(3) vs 62.25 mm(3); P < 0.0001), have a higher remodelling index (1.27 vs 1.01; P < 0.0001), and present a significantly larger LDP with a density < 30 HU (23.3 mm(3) vs 7.6 mm(3); P < 0.0001) or < 60 HU (33.4 mm(3) vs 16.9 mm(3); P < 0.0001) than nonculprit lesions. The presence of a plaque more than 20 mm(3) in volume with a CT density < 30 HU (P = 0.0009) and the presence of all 3 markers of plaque vulnerability (LDP, spotty calcifications or positive remodelling) (P = 0.01) significantly correlated with the presence of an NSTEMI. CONCLUSIONS Culprit lesions demonstrated larger plaque volumes, a higher burden with low-density cores, and more intense remodelling than nonculprit lesions, whereas culprit lesions associated with NSTEMI showed a higher burden with lower density cores than those associated with unstable angina.
Collapse
|
35
|
Lai HM, Aronow WS, Mercando AD, Kalen P, Desai HV, Gandhi K, Sharma M, Amin H, Lai TM. Risk factor reduction in progression of angiographic coronary artery disease. Arch Med Sci 2012; 8:444-8. [PMID: 22851998 PMCID: PMC3400910 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2012.29399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2011] [Revised: 01/15/2012] [Accepted: 01/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate differences between outpatients with progressive and nonprogressive coronary artery disease (CAD) measured by coronary angiography. MATERIAL AND METHODS Chart reviews were performed in patients in an outpatient cardiology practice having ≥ 2 coronary angiographies ≥ 1 year apart. Progressive CAD was defined as 1) new non-obstructive or obstructive CAD in a previously disease-free vessel; or 2) new obstruction in a previously non-obstructive vessel. Coronary risk factors, comorbidities, cardiovascular events, medication use, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and blood pressure were used for analysis. RESULTS The study included 183 patients, mean age 71 years. Mean follow-up duration was 11 years. Mean follow-up between coronary angiographies was 58 months. Of 183 patients, 108 (59%) had progressive CAD, and 75 (41%) had nonprogressive CAD. The use of statins, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and aspirin was not significantly different in patient with progressive CAD or nonprogressive CAD Mean arterial pressure was higher in patients with progressive CAD than in patients with nonprogressive CAD (97±13 mm Hg vs. 92±12 mm Hg) (p<0.05). Serum LDL-C was insignificantly higher in patients with progressive CAD (94±40 mg/dl) than in patients with nonprogressive CAD (81±34 mg/dl) (p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that in addition to using appropriate medical therapy, control of blood pressure and serum LDL-C level may reduce progression of CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoang M Lai
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fearon WF. Is a myocardial infarction more likely to result from a mild coronary lesion or an ischemia-producing one? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 4:539-41. [PMID: 22186104 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.111.966416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
37
|
William Edward Boden, MD: a conversation with the editor. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:145-59. [PMID: 22704294 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2012] [Accepted: 03/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|