Incidence, Patterns, and Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation Among Patients With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the PARIS Registry (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimens in Stented Patients)

Medical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of mortality among this population. In addition, chronic kidney disease is a major risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease and is widely regarded as a coronary artery disease risk equivalent. Medical therapy is the cornerstone of coronary artery disease management in the general population. However, there are few trials to guide medical therapy of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease, with most data extrapolated from clinical trials of mainly non-chronic kidney disease patients, which were not adequately powered to evaluate this subgroup. There is some evidence to suggest that the efficacy of certain therapies such as aspirin and statins is attenuated with declining estimated glomerular filtration rate, with questionable benefit among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Furthermore, chronic kidney disease and ESRD patients are at higher risk of potential side effects with therapy, which may limit their use. In this review, we summarize the available evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of medical therapy of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease and ESRD patients. We also discuss the data on new emerging therapies, including PCSK9i, SGLT2i, GLP1 receptor agonists, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, which show promise at reducing risk of cardiovascular events in the chronic kidney disease population and may offer additional treatment options. Overall, dedicated studies directly evaluating chronic kidney disease patients, particularly those with advanced chronic kidney disease and ESRD, are greatly needed to establish the optimal medical therapy for coronary artery disease and improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Incidence and impact of antiplatelet therapy cessation among very older patients with stable coronary artery disease

Objectives: Long-term use of evidence-based antiplatelet therapy is recommended for management of stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). However, non-adherence to antiplatelet drugs is common in older patients. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and impact of antiplatelet therapy cessation on clinical outcomes of older patients with SCAD. Methods: A total of 351 consecutive eligible very older patients (≥80 years) with SCAD from the PLA General Hospital were included. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected during follow-up. Patients were divided into cessation group and standard group based on whether discontinuing of antiplatelet drugs. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and secondary outcomes were minor bleeding and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 351 participants, with a mean age of 91.76 ± 5.01 years old (range 80-106 years) were included in statistical analysis. The antiplatelet drug cessation rate was 60.1%. There were 211 patients in cessation group and 140 patients in standard group. During a median follow-up of 98.6 months, the primary outcome of MACE occurred in 155 patients (73.5%) in the cessation group and 84 patients (60.0%) in the standard group (HR = 1.476, 95% CI:1.124-1.938, p = 0.005). Cessation of antiplatelet drugs increased the rates of angina (HR = 1.724, 95% CI:1.211-2.453, p = 0.002) and non-fatal MI (HR = 1.569, 95% CI:1.093-2.251, p = 0.014). The secondary outcomes of minor bleeding and all-cause mortality were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Among very older patients with SCAD, antiplatelet therapy cessation significantly increased the risk of MACE, and continuous antiplatelet drug therapy didn't increase the risk of minor bleeding.

Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Chronic Kidney Disease or Dialysis (from a Japanese Nationwide Registry)

The relation between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and outcomes in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is thought to be bidirectional; these patients are at a higher risk of ischemic and bleeding events. From a Japanese nationwide PCI registry, ischemic (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke) and bleeding events (fatal or nonfatal major bleeding) 1 year after discharge among patients who had second- or newer-generation drug-eluting stent implantation were analyzed. Patients on oral anticoagulants were excluded. Patients were stratified according to their preprocedural renal function: CKD stages 1 to 2 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m²), 3 (eGFR 30 to 59), or 4 to 5 (eGFR <30), or those receiving dialysis. Overall, 23,349 patients, including 2,798 patients with CKD 3 to 5 (12.0%) and 1,464 patients on dialysis (6.3%), were investigated. One-year ischemic events were observed in 1.5%, 5.2%, 9.7%, and 5.3% in the CKD stages 1-to-2, 3, 4-to-5, and dialysis groups, respectively; patients with CKD stages 3 or 4 to 5 and those receiving dialysis were associated with higher risks of ischemic events after adjustment of covariates than were patients without CKD. Compared with ischemic events, 1-year bleeding events were low, with incidence rates of 1.5%, 2.0%, 3.4%, and 2.3%, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of CKD or dialysis was not associated with a higher risk of bleeding events after adjustment of covariates. In conclusion, in the contemporary nationwide PCI registry, the presence of CKD and dialysis was independently associated with a higher risk of ischemic events but not with bleeding events, and this suggests a need to alter the models of care delivery in these patients.

Benefit and risk of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not clearly established. This study purposed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with 6-12 (standard) versus 12-24 months (prolonged) DAPT according to CKD.

METHODS

Using a nationwide, claim-based database, we retrospectively evaluated association between DAPT duration and clinical outcomes including death, composite ischemic event, and composite bleeding event between 1 and 3 years after PCI. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m². Of 73,941 eligible patients, 13,425 (18.2%) had CKD and 49,019 (66%) were prescribed prolonged DAPT. Prolonged DAPT had no significant impact on the risk of clinical outcomes in patients with normal renal function.

RESULTS

In patients with CKD, prolonged DAPT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95) and composite ischemic events (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96) and a higher risk of composite bleeding events (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37). Benefit of prolonged DAPT on reducing composite ischemic event increased significantly in patients with worsened renal dysfunction (p_interaction = 0.02) while there was no significant interaction between its bleeding risk and renal dysfunction (p_interaction = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

While standard DAPT would be recommended in patients with normal renal function, tailored decision for DAPT duration would be considered in those with CKD to balance between ischemic and bleeding risks.

Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease: a pre-specified analysis of the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared to drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are scarce, particularly at long term. This pre-specified analysis aimed to investigate the 3-year efficacy and safety of DCB versus DES for small coronary artery disease (< 3 mm) according to renal function at baseline.

METHODS

BASKET-SMALL-2 was a large multi-center, randomized, controlled trial that tested the efficacy and safety of DCBs (n = 382) against DESs (n = 376) in small vessel disease. CKD was defined as eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (MACE) during 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 174/758 (23%) patients had CKD, out of which 91 were randomized to DCB and 83 to DES implantation. The primary efficacy outcome during 3 years was similar in both, DCB and DES patients (HR 0.98; 95%-CI 0.67-1.44; p = 0.937) and patients with and without CKD (HR 1.18; 95%-CI 0.76-1.83; p = 0.462), respectively. Rates of cardiac death and all-cause death were significantly higher among patients with CKD but not affected by treatment with DCB or DES. Major bleeding events were lower in the DCB when compared to the DES group (12 vs. 3, HR 0.26; 95%-CI 0.07-0.92; p = 0.037) and not influenced by presence of CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term efficacy and safety of DCB was similar in patients with and without CKD. The use of DCB was associated with significantly fewer major bleeding events (NCT01574534). Central Illustration. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stents in small coronary artery disease with and without chronic kidney disease, a prespecified subgroup analysis of the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial.

Untangling the difficult interplay between ischemic and hemorrhagic risk: The role of risk scores

BACKGROUND

Bleedings are an independent risk factor for subsequent mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This represents a hazard equivalent to or greater than that for recurrent ACS. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) represents the cornerstone in the secondary prevention of thrombotic events, but the benefit of such therapy is counteracted by the increased hemorrhagic complications. Therefore, an early and individualized patient risk stratification can help to identify high-risk patients who could benefit the most from intensive medical therapies while minimizing unnecessary treatment complications in low-risk patients.

AIM

To review existing literature and gain better understanding of the role of ischemic and hemorrhagic risk scores in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

METHODS

We used a combination of terms potentially used in literature describing the most common ischemic and hemorrhagic risk scores to search in PubMed as well as references of full-length articles.

RESULTS

In this review we briefly describe the most important ischemic and bleeding scores that can be adopted in patients with IHD, focusing on GRACE, CHA2DS2-Vasc, PARIS CTE, DAPT, CRUSADE, ACUITY, HAS-BLED, PARIS MB and PRECISE-DAPT score. In the second part of this review, we try to define a possible approach to the IHD patient, using the most suitable scores to stratify patient risk and decide the most appropriate patient treatment.

CONCLUSION

It becomes evident that risk scores by themselves can’t be the solution to balance the ischemic/bleeding risk of an IHD patient. Instead, some risk factors that are commonly associated with an elevated risk profile and that are already included in risk scores should be the focus of the clinician while he/she is taking care of a patient affected by IHD.

Use and outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome in patients with chronic kidney disease: insights from the Canadian Observational Antiplatelet Study (COAPT)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in CKD poses a challenge due to the increased bleeding and clotting tendencies, particularly since patients with CKD were underrepresented in randomized controlled trials. We examined the practice patterns of DAPT prescription stratified by the presence of CKD. The multicentre prospective Canadian Observational Antiplatelet Study (COAPT) enrolled patients with ACS between December 2011 and May 2013. The present study is a subgroup analysis comparing type and duration of DAPT and associated outcomes among patients with and without CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², calculated by CKD-EPI). Patients with CKD (275/1921, 14.3%) were prescribed prasugrel/ticagrelor less (18.5% vs 25.8%, p = 0.01) and had a shorter duration of DAPT therapy versus patients without CKD (median 382 vs 402 days, p = 0.003). CKD was associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months (p < 0.001) but not bleeding when compared to patients without CKD. CKD was associated with MACE in both patients on prasugrel/ticagrelor (p = 0.017) and those on clopidogrel (p < 0.001) (p for heterogeneity = 0.70). CKD was associated with increased bleeding only among patients receiving prasugrel/ticagrelor (p = 0.007), but not among those receiving clopidogrel (p = 0.64) (p for heterogeneity = 0.036). Patients with CKD had a shorter DAPT duration and were less frequently prescribed potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors than patients without CKD. Overall, compared with patients without CKD, patients with CKD had higher rates of MACE and similar bleeding rates. However, among those prescribed more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, CKD was associated with more bleeding than those without CKD. Further studies are needed to better define the benefit/risk evaluation, and establish a more tailored and evidence-based DAPT regimen for this high-risk patient group.

2021 Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations on the Use of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in the Asia-Pacific Region: Special Populations

Advanced age, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease not only increase the risk for ischaemic events in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) but also confer a high bleeding risk during antiplatelet therapy. These special populations may warrant modification of therapy, especially among Asians, who have displayed characteristics that are clinically distinct from Western patients. Previous guidance has been provided regarding the classification of high-risk CCS and the use of newer-generation P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor and prasugrel) after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Asia. The authors summarise evidence on the use of these P2Y₁₂ inhibitors during the transition from ACS to CCS and among special populations. Specifically, they present recommendations on the roles of standard dual antiplatelet therapy, shortened dual antiplatelet therapy and single antiplatelet therapy among patients with coronary artery disease, who are either transitioning from ACS to CCS; elderly; or with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, multivessel coronary artery disease and bleeding events during therapy.

Cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting balloons in chronic kidney disease: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with poorer outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. Drug-eluting balloons are used for in-stent restenosis and selected cases of de-novo coronary lesions. Little is known regarding the outcomes of individuals with CKD who undergo PCI with drug-eluting balloons. The goal of this study was to assess outcomes of PCI with drug-eluting balloons in individuals with CKD.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, outcomes of PCI with drug-eluting balloons were compared between 101 patients with CKD and 261 without CKD. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73m2. We compared demographics, procedure data and clinical outcomes in the first and second years following the procedure.

RESULTS

Rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and myocardial infarction were higher in patients with than without CKD: 23.8% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.005 and 15.9% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.001, respectively. Rates of target lesion revascularization were similar, 14.9 and 11.5%, respectively, P = 0.4. Shorter duration of dual anti-platelet therapy was observed among patients with than without CKD (10.0 + 3.4 vs. 10.9 + 3.7 months, P < 0.05). First-year hemorrhage episodes were similar in the two groups (0.08 ± 0.4 and 0.03 ± 0.2, respectively, P = 0.2). In a multivariate regression analysis, CKD was associated with increased risks of first year MACE (OR 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI with drug-eluting balloons was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with than without CKD. However, rates of target lesion revascularization were similar in the two groups. Shorter duration of dual anti-platelet therapy was observed in the CKD group.

Antiplatelet therapy after PCI in patients with high risk of bleeding

The progress of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) over the last few decades facilitated treatment of increasingly complex patient populations. The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DESs) led to need of stronger and prolonged inhibition of platelets which in turn increased the incidence of bleeding complications. The identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) during and after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is still problematic in everyday clinical practice.

Impact of Anemia on the Risk of Bleeding Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients ≥75 Years of Age

Bleeding risk stratification is an unresolved issue in older adults. Anemia may reflect subclinical blood losses that can be exacerbated after percutaneous coronary intervention . We sought to prospectively determine the contribution of anemia to the risk of bleeding in 448 consecutive patients aged 75 or more years, treated by percutaneous coronary interventions without concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation. We evaluated the effect of WHO-defined anemia on the incidence of 1-year nonaccess site-related major bleeding. The prevalence of anemia was 39%, and 13.1% of anemic and 5.2% of nonanemic patients suffered a bleeding event (hazard ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.54, p = 0.004). Neither PRECISE-DAPT nor CRUSADE scores were superior to hemoglobin for the prediction of bleeding. In conclusion, anemia is a powerful predictor of bleeding with potential utility for simplifying tailoring therapies.

Effect of Renal Dysfunction on the Risks for Ischemic and Bleeding Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

There is a paucity of studies exploring whether the ischemia-bleeding trade-off could be different according to the stages of renal dysfunction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 19,598 patients in a pooled database from 3 Japanese PCI studies (CREDO-Kyoto Cohort-2, RESET, and NEXT), 1,547 patients had concomitant AF. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their renal function (Creatinine clearance [CCr] >60 ml/min: n = 703, 60≥ CCr >30 ml/min: n = 627, CCr ≤30 ml/min: n = 126, Dialysis: n = 91). The cumulative 3-year incidences of both the primary ischemic (ischemic stroke/myocardial infarction) and bleeding (GUSTO moderate/severe) outcome increased incrementally with worsening renal function (11.4%, 12.6%, 16.8%, and 31.7%, p <0.001, and 7.5%, 14.9%, 26.3%, and 29.5%, p <0.001, respectively). Compared with CCr >60 ml/min group, the excess adjusted risk for the primary ischemic outcome was significant only in dialysis group (hazards ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 3.69, p = 0.009), but not in 60≥ CCr >30 ml/min and CCr ≤30 ml/min groups (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.29, p = 0.54, and HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.69, p = 0.83, respectively), whereas the excess adjusted risk for the primary bleeding outcome was significant in all 3 groups of renal dysfunction (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.45, p = 0.01, HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.61, p <0.001, and HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.85 to 5.75, p <0.001, respectively). In conclusion, in AF patients receiving PCI, the worsening renal function was strongly associated with the increasingly higher risk for bleeding events, whereas the excess risk for ischemic events was significant only in patients on dialysis.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease and Anemia on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

Few studies have evaluated outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with both anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dl in women; <13 in men) and chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²). Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI in our health system from 2010 to 2018 were included (n = 10,756), excluding those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or shock. We evaluated the individual and combined effects of anemia and CKD on outcomes. Five-year mortality was highest in the cohort with both anemia and CKD and lowest in those with neither. After multivariate analysis, with the group with neither anemia nor CKD as a reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 1.95, p <0.001) for those with anemia alone, 1.33 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.53, p <0.001) for those with CKD alone, and 2.83 (95% CI 2.49 to 3.22, p <0.001) for those with both anemia and CKD. With respect to readmission and reintervention, similar tends were observed, with patients with both CKD and anemia having the highest risk for these outcomes. In conclusion, the combined effects of anemia and CKD on outcomes post-PCI appear to be worse than either of their effects individually.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent implantation: A subanalysis of the Tokyo-MD PCI registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the 5-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of EES. However, limited information exists on the long-term clinical outcomes associated with CKD.

METHODS

The Tokyo-MD PCI study is a multi-center observational study designed to describe the clinical outcomes of unselected patients after EES implantation. In this subanalysis, patients on maintenance hemodialysis were excluded, and patients with (n = 316) or without (n = 1,424) CKD were evaluated for their 5-year incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST).

RESULTS

The mean and median follow-up duration were 1,391 ± 557 days and 1,769 days (interquartile range, 1,012-1,800 days), respectively. Although the incidence of ID-TLR and ST was similar between patients with and without CKD (4.9% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.26, 0.5% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.20, respectively), cardiac death and MACE were significantly higher in patients with CKD than in those without CKD (6.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.007, 26.9% vs. 14.0%, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, CKD was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 1.22 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.43], P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD had similar ID-TLR and ST rates as those without CKD at 5 years after EES implantation. The risk of long-term MACEs appeared to be associated with CKD.

A focused review on optimal coronary revascularisation in patients with chronic kidney disease: Coronary revascularisation in kidney disease

Concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is known to have poor outcomes. With a thorough literature review, we discuss the pathophysiological basis behind accelerated atherosclerosis in CKD, and the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in these patients, focusing on drug-eluting stents, coronary artery bypass grafting, and adverse outcomes. We discuss factors contributing to poor outcomes in these patients, and the need for more work in this subgroup.