Longitudinal Improvements in Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease

Cumulative Radiation Exposure and Lifetime Cancer Risk in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot Requiring Early Intervention

Background

Neonates with tetralogy of Fallot and symptomatic cyanosis (sTOF) require early intervention, utilizing either a staged repair (SR) or primary repair (PR) approach. They are exposed to several sources of low-dose ionizing radiation, which may contribute to increased cancer risk.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare cumulative radiation exposure and associated lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer between treatment strategies in sTOF.

Methods

Neonates with sTOF who underwent SR or PR from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from the Congenital Cardiac Research Collaborative. Radiation exposure from all radiologic studies prior to 18 months of age was converted to organ-equivalent doses and projected LAR of cancer incidence using the National Cancer Institute dosimetry tools.

Results

There were 242 neonates from 8 centers, including patients with 146 SR and 96 PR. Cumulative total effective dose was significantly higher for SR (median 8.3 mSv, IQR: 3.0-17.4 mSv) than PR (2.1 mSv, IQR: 0.8-8.5 mSv; P < 0.001). Cumulative organ-level doses were significantly higher in SR compared to PR. Regardless of treatment strategy, LARs were higher in females compared to males. Among organs with median exposure >1 mGy in females, the LAR was highest for breast in SR (mean 1.9/1,000 patients). The highest proportion of cancers attributable to radiation exposure was projected for thyroid cancer in females undergoing SR (7.3%).

Conclusions

Cumulative radiation exposure and LARs were higher among those undergoing SR compared to PR. This will be an important factor to consider in determining the preferred neonatal treatment strategy and should substantiate efforts to reduce radiation exposure in this vulnerable population.

Rationale and design of the randomized COmparison of Methods for Pulmonary blood flow Augmentation: Shunt versus Stent (COMPASS) trial: A Pediatric Heart Network study

Neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) and ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow (DD-PBF) require early intervention. Historically, this intervention was most often a surgical systemic-to-pulmonary shunt (SPS; e.g., Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt). However, over the past two decades an alternative to SPS has emerged in the form of transcatheter ductal artery stenting (DAS). While many reports have indicated safety and durability of the DAS approach, few studies compare outcomes between DAS and SPS. The reports that do exist are comprised primarily of small-cohort single-center reviews. Two multicenter retrospective studies suggest that DAS is associated with similar or superior survival compared to SPS. These studies offer the best evidence to-date, and yet both have important limitations. The authors describe herein the rationale and design of the COMPASS (COmparison of Methods for Pulmonary blood flow Augmentation: Shunt vs. Stent) Trial (NCT05268094, IDE G210212). The COMPASS Trial aims to randomize 236 neonates with DD-PBF to either DAS or SPS across approximately 27 pediatric centers in North America. The goal of this trial is to compare important clinical outcomes between DAS and SPS over the first year of life in a cohort of neonates balanced by randomization to assess whether one method of palliation demonstrates therapeutic superiority.

Recommendations for centers performing pediatric heart surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Congenital Cardiac Catheterization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The International Quality Improvement Collaborative Catheterization Registry

Background

No published data are available on the patient, procedural characteristics, and outcomes of congenital heart disease (CHD) cardiac catheterization performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Objectives

The objective of this study was to describe procedural characteristics and patient outcomes of CHD cardiac catheterizations in LMICs.

Methods

Cases performed between January 2019 and December 2020 from 15 centers in the International Quality Improvement Collaborative Congenital Heart Disease Catheterization Registry (IQIC-CHDCR) data were included. The Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization (PREDIC3T) classification was used to stratify risk. Outcomes of interest included mortality, severe adverse events (SAEs), and procedural efficacy. Procedural efficacy, based on technical and safety endpoints, was categorized into optimal, adequate, and inadequate for 5 common interventional procedures.

Results

There were 3,287 cases, of which 60% (n = 1,973) were interventional cases. Most of the cases (66%) were in patients between the ages of 1 to 18 years with a median patient age of 4 years. PREDIC3T risk class 1 and 2 were most common in 37% and 38% of cases, respectively. SAEs occurred in 2.8% while the death was reported within <72 hours post catheterization 1%. The majority of device implantation procedures patent ductus arteriosus (67%) and atrial septal defect (60%) had optimal procedure efficacy outcomes.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that congenital cardiac catheterization is safely performed in LMICs. Future work addressing predictors of SAEs and adverse procedural outcomes may help future quality improvement initiatives.

Cumulative Radiation Dose from Medical Imaging in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review

Children with congenital heart disease are exposed to repeated medical imaging throughout their lifetime. Although the imaging contributes to their care and treatment, exposure to ionising radiation is known to increase one's lifetime attributable risk of malignancy. A systematic search of multiple databases was performed. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to all relevant papers and seven were deemed acceptable for quality assessment and risk of bias assessment. The cumulative effective dose (CED) varied widely across the patient cohorts, ranging from 0.96 mSv to 53.5 mSv. However, it was evident across many of the included studies that a significant number of patients were exposed to a CED >20 mSv, the current annual occupational exposure limit. Many factors affected the dose which patients received, including age and clinical demographics. The imaging modality which contributed the most radiation dose to patients was cardiology interventional procedures. Paediatric patients with congenital heart disease are at an increased risk of receiving an elevated cumulative radiation dose across their lifetime. Further research should focus on identifying risk factors for receiving higher radiation doses, keeping track of doses, and dose optimisation where possible.

Safety and Short-Term Outcomes for Infants < 2.5 kg Undergoing PDA Device Closure: A C3PO Registry Study

To evaluate short-term procedural outcomes and safety for infants < 2.5 kg who underwent catheterization with intended patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) device closure in a multi-center registry, as performance of this procedure becomes widespread. A multi-center retrospective review was performed using data from the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes (C3PO) registry. Data were collected for all intended cases of PDA closure in infants < 2.5 kg from April 2019 to December 2020 at 13 participating sites. Successful device closure was defined as device placement at the conclusion of the catheterization. Procedural outcomes and adverse events (AE) were described, and associations between patient characteristics, procedural outcomes and AEs were analyzed. During the study period, 300 cases were performed with a median weight of 1.0 kg (range 0.7-2.4). Successful device closure was achieved in 98.7% of cases with a 1.7% incidence of level 4/5 AEs, including one periprocedural mortality. Neither failed device placement nor adverse events were significantly associated with patient age, weight or institutional volume. Higher incidence of adverse events associated with patients who had non-cardiac problems (p = 0.017) and cases with multiple devices attempted (p = 0.064). Transcatheter PDA closure in small infants can be performed with excellent short-term outcomes and safety across institutions with variable case volume.

Sustained radiation reduction following initial quality improvement intervention in a paediatric cardiac catheterisation laboratory

BACKGROUND

As part of a quality improvement project beginning in October 2011, our centre introduced changes to reduce radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisations. This led to significant initial decreases in radiation to patients. Starting in April 2016, we sought to determine whether these initial reductions were sustained.

METHODS

After a 30-day trial period, we implemented (1) weight-based reductions in preset frame rates for fluoroscopy and angiography, (2) increased use of collimators and safety shields, (3) utilisation of stored fluoroscopy and virtual magnification, and (4) hiring of a devoted radiation technician. We collected patient weight (kg), total fluoroscopy time (min), and procedure radiation dosage (cGy-cm2) for cardiac catheterisations between October, 2011 and September, 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 1889 procedures were evaluated (196 pre-intervention, 303 in the post-intervention time period, and 1400 in the long-term group). Fluoroscopy times (18.3 ± 13.6 pre; 19.8 ± 14.1 post; 17.11 ± 15.06 long-term, p = 0.782) were not significantly different between the three groups. Patient mean radiation dose per kilogram decreased significantly after the initial quality improvement intervention (39.7% reduction, p = 0.039) and was sustained over the long term (p = 0.043). Provider radiation exposure was also significantly decreased from the onset of this project through the long-term period (overall decrease of 73%, p < 0.01) despite several changes in the interventional cardiologists who made up the team over this time period.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of technical and clinical practice changes can result in a significant reduction in radiation exposure for patients and providers in a paediatric cardiac catheterisation laboratory. These reductions can be maintained over the long term.

Variation in Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Practice Patterns and Associated Risks Prior to Superior Cavopulmonary Connection: A Multicenter Analysis

Single ventricle patients typically undergo some form of advanced diagnostic imaging prior to superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC). We sought to evaluate variability of diagnostic practice and associated comprehensive risk. A retrospective evaluation across 4 institutions was performed (1/1/2010-9/30/2016) comparing the primary modalities of cardiac catheterization (CC), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and cardiac computed tomography (CT). Associated risks included anesthesia/sedation, vascular access, total room time, contrast agent usage, radiation exposure, and adverse events (AEs). Of 617 patients undergoing SCPC, 409 (66%) underwent at least one advanced diagnostic imaging study in the 60 days prior to surgery. Seventy-eight of these patients (13%) were analyzed separately because of a concomitant cardiac intervention during CC. Of 331 (54%) with advanced imaging and without catheterization intervention, diagnostic CC was most common (59%), followed by CT (27%) and CMR (14%). Primary modality varied significantly by institution (p < 0.001). Median time between imaging and SCPC was 13 days (IQR 3-33). Anesthesia/sedation varied significantly (p < 0.001). Pre-procedural vascular access did not vary significantly across modalities (p = 0.111); procedural access varied between CMR/CT and CC, in which central access was used in all procedures. Effective radiation dose was significantly higher for CC than CT (p < 0.001). AE rate varied significantly, with 12% CC, 6% CMR, and 1% CT (p = 0.004). There is significant practice variability in the use of advanced diagnostic imaging prior to SCPC, with important differences in associated procedural risk. Future studies to identify differences in diagnostic accuracy and long-term outcomes are warranted to optimize diagnostic protocols.

Interpreting Quality Improvement When Introducing New Technology: A Collaborative Experience in ASD Device Closures

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the regular introduction of new technologies into interventional cardiac catheterization procedures, in this case new atrial septal defect (ASD) closure devices, while conducting a multi-center collaborative initiative to reduce radiation usage during all procedures. Data were collected prospectively by 8 C3PO institutions between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 for ASD device closure procedures in the cardiac catheterization lab during a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed at reducing patient radiation exposure. Radiation exposure was measured in dose area product per body weight (µGy*m²/kg). Use of proposed practice change strategies at the beginning and end of the QI intervention period was assessed. Radiation exposure was summarized by institution and by initial type of device used for closure. This study included 602 ASD device closures. Without changes in patient characteristics, total fluoroscopy duration, or number of digital acquisitions, median radiation exposure decreased from 37 DAP/kg to 14 DAP/kg from 2014 to 2017. While all individual centers decreased overall median DAP/kg, the use of novel devices for ASD closure correlated with a temporary period of worsening institutional radiation exposure and increased fluoroscopy time. The introduction of new ASD closure devices resulted in increased radiation exposure during a QI project designed to reduce radiation exposure. Therefore, outcome assessment must be contextualized in QI projects, hospital evaluation, and public reporting, to acknowledge the expected variation during innovation and introduction of novel therapies.

The Burden of Radiation Exposure During Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defect

Radiation reduction in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory is well-suited for targeted quality improvement (QI) interventions. Transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure was chosen for this QI project based on a homogenous procedural population and inter-operator variability in radiation usage, with the aim to reduce radiation exposure during ASD device closure by 50% over 1 year. The aim for this project was defined and a Key Driver Diagram (KDD) was created with three domains for change: modification of procedural practice, reporting and monitoring/feedback, and team engagement. All patients undergoing attempted transcatheter ASD closure were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome, % reduction in median radiation dose (DAP/Kg), was determined through comparison with a historical cohort. Additional radiation metrics, procedural characteristics, and adverse events (AE) were compared to the historical cohort. Radiation exposure (DAP/kg) was reduced by 55% with a median dose reduction from 26 (15, 61) in a historical cohort to 12 (6, 22) in the intervention population (p <0.001). Fluoroscopy time and cine acquisition utilization significantly decreased. Procedure time, procedural success (defined as successful delivery of the device) and AE did not increase in the QI cohort. Successful practice changes included standardized procedural strategies to limit fluoroscopy and cine acquisition, improved fluoroscopic practice, engagement of the multidisciplinary team, and feedback with data reporting by electronic and in-person reminders. In conclusion, application of QI methodologies such as KDD with engagement of a multidisciplinary team can effectively reduce radiation in the pediatric catheterization laboratory.