Comparison of Transfemoral Versus Transradial Secondary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Upper extremity versus lower extremity for secondary access during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: rationale and design of the randomised TAVI XS trial

BACKGROUND

During transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), secondary access is required for angiographic guidance and temporary pacing. The most commonly used secondary access sites are the femoral artery (angiographic guidance) and the femoral vein (temporary pacing). An upper extremity approach using the radial artery and an upper arm vein instead of the lower extremity approach using the femoral artery and femoral vein may reduce clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding complications, but robust evidence is lacking.

TRIAL DESIGN

The TAVI XS trial is a multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 238 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI will be included. The primary endpoint is the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (i.e. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding) of the randomised secondary access site (either diagnostic or pacemaker access, or both) within 30 days after TAVI. Secondary endpoints include time to mobilisation after TAVI, duration of hospitalisation, any BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding, and early safety at 30 days according to Valve Academic Research Consortium‑3 criteria.

CONCLUSION

The TAVI XS trial is the first randomised trial comparing an upper extremity approach to a lower extremity approach with regard to clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding complications. The results of this trial will provide important insights into the safety and efficacy of an upper extremity approach in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI.

TAVR in Older Adults: Moving Toward a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Away From Chronological Age: JACC Family Series

Calcific aortic stenosis can be considered a model for geriatric cardiovascular conditions due to a confluence of factors. The remarkable technological development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement was studied initially on older adult populations with prohibitive or high-risk for surgical valve replacement. Through these trials, the cardiovascular community has recognized that stratification of these chronologically older adults can be improved incrementally by invoking the concept of frailty and other geriatric risks. Given the complexity of the aging process, stratification by chronological age should only be the initial step but is no longer sufficient to optimally quantify cardiovascular and noncardiovascular risk. In this review, we employ a geriatric cardiology lens to focus on the diagnosis and the comprehensive management of aortic stenosis in older adults to enhance shared decision-making with patients and their families and optimize patient-centered outcomes. Finally, we highlight knowledge gaps that are critical for future areas of study.

"Piggyback Pigtails": Simplifying secondary transradial access for TAVR

Minimalist approaches have evolved for TAVR over the last years with impact on in-hospital stay and patient safety. As part of this concept, transradial secondary arterial access is capable of reducing vascular and bleeding complications. Yet, steering of the marker pigtail catheter in the descending aorta might by fluoroscopic imaging sometimes be challenging. In our manuscript, we present a very simple "piggyback" technique, simplifying management of transradial secondary access in transfemoral TAVR.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Access Sites: Same Goals, Distinct Aspects, Various Merits and Demerits

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been established as a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Despite being initially developed and indicated for high-surgical-risk patients, it is now offered to low-risk populations based on the results of large randomized controlled trials. The most common access sites in the vast majority of patients undergoing TAVI are the common femoral arteries; however, 10-20% of the patients treated with TAVI require an alternative access route, mainly due to peripheral atherosclerotic disease or complex anatomy. Hence, to achieve successful delivery and implantation of the valve, several arterial approaches have been studied, including transcarotid (TCr), axillary/subclavian (A/Sc), transapical (TAp), transaortic (TAo), suprasternal-brachiocephalic (S-B), and transcaval (TCv). This review aims to concisely summarize the most recent literature data and current guidelines as well as evaluate the various access routes for TAVI, focusing on the indications, the various special patient groups, and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, as well as their adverse events.

Routine postaccess-closure angiography to detect vascular complications following transfemoral TAVR

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications following transfemoral TAVR are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Measures that may mitigate this risk are important.

AIM

To evaluate the utility of routine, access-vessel angiography post sheath-removal in the detection and management of complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 512 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with routine post access-closure angiography from the radial artery. Rates of mild angiographically evident bleeding, bleeding requiring surgery/interventional-radiology, ischemia, 90-day access-site-related events, and major and minor vascular complications using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 512 patients, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was undertaken via the radial artery in 467 patients (91%). In the remaining patients (9%) DSA was either not attempted, due to concerns regarding kidney disease and contrast volume, or failed due to anatomical factors (aortic tortuosity/calcification). Significant chronic kidney disease was present at baseline in 72.4% of this cohort (stages III-IV or dialysis). Ninety-four percent of cases underwent TAVR using a balloon-expandable platform. Mild iliofemoral extravasation was observed in 7.7% of the DSA cases. These cases were managed by manual compression with none requiring any vascular intervention subsequently. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major and minor access-site-related complications were observed in 0.4% and 12.2%, respectively. Access-site-related bleeding and ischemic events requiring interventional-radiology or vascular-surgery were observed in 0.9% and 1.7% of the DSA cases, respectively. No new renal replacement therapy was needed in any of the DSA cases. Discharge to 90-day access-related complications was 0.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine post access-closure angiography is feasible via the radial artery in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR and appears safe. It facilitates early identification of complications and mitigates risk by enabling prompt action to be taken. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence

Since the first groundbreaking procedure in 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the management of aortic stenosis (AS). Through striking developments in pertinent equipment and techniques, TAVI has now become the leading therapeutic strategy for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic AS. The procedure streamlining from routine use of conscious sedation to a single arterial access approach, the newly adapted implantation techniques, and the introduction of novel technologies such as intravascular lithotripsy and the refinement of valve-bioprosthesis devices along with the accumulating experience have resulted in a dramatic reduction of complications and have improved associated outcomes that are now considered comparable or even superior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). These advances have opened the road to the use of TAVI in younger and lower-risk patients and up-to-date data from landmark studies have now established the outstanding efficacy and safety of TAVI in patients with low-surgical risk impelling the most recent ESC guidelines to propose TAVI, as the main therapeutic strategy for patients with AS aged 75 years or older. In this article, we aim to summarize the most recent advances and the current clinical aspects involving the use of TAVI, and we also attempt to highlight impending concerns that need to be further addressed.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Overview

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established procedure for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. The optimal antithrombotic regimen following TAVR, currently unknown and inconsistently applied, is impacted by thromboembolic risk, frailty, bleeding risk, and comorbidities. There is a quickly growing body of literature examining the complex issues underlying antithrombotic regimens post-TAVR. This review provides an overview of thromboembolic and bleeding events following TAVR, summarizes the evidence regarding optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant use post-TAVR, and highlights current challenges and future directions. By understanding appropriate indications and outcomes associated with different antithrombotic regimens post-TAVR, morbidity and mortality can be minimized in a generally frail and elderly patient population.

Clinical outcomes following single access transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

We describe the first experience using calcification of anatomical landmarks to obviate the need for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) alignment aortography and secondary TAVI access.

BACKGROUND

TAVI alignment conventionally involves secondary femoral access for contrast aortography using a second catheter. Secondary femoral access accounts for up to 25% of all vascular complications. Heavily calcified aortic leaflets are often visible fluoroscopically and can act as markers for TAVI alignment.

METHODS

We considered 100 consecutive patients for transfemoral TAVI. The first group was considered for a conventional dual access technique and the subsequent group was considered for a single access technique. Relevant baseline, and procedural and outcome measures were recorded.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) were used in all cases. THV implantation was successful in 100% of cases with no procedural or in-hospital mortality. Procedural time and contrast use were lower in the single access group. There were no Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 major vascular complications with the single access technique.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study describing the use of calcification of anatomical landmarks to obviate the need for secondary TAVI access. Notable observations included successful device implantation in all cases, no VARC-2 major vascular complications, comparable rates of paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker requirement, shorter procedural times, and lower contrast use. Single access TAVI is a viable alternative technique to minimize vascular access, contrast use, and procedural duration in experienced centers and with selected patients, allowing successful device implantation and low complication rates while further streamlining TAVI workflow.

Strategies for Facilitating Totally Percutaneous Transfemoral TAVR Procedures

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the treatment of aortic stenosis and should ideally be performed as a totally percutaneous procedure via the transfemoral (TF) approach. Peripheral vascular disease may impede valve delivery, and vascular access site complications are associated with adverse clinical outcome and increased mortality. We review strategies aimed to facilitate TF valve delivery in patients with hostile vascular anatomy and achieve percutaneous management of vascular complications.

Radial versus femoral secondary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the risk of procedural complications after TAVR using secondary radial access (RA) versus femoral access (FA) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) entails both large-bore arterial access for device delivery and secondary arterial access for hemodynamic and imaging assessments. It is unknown whether RA versus FA for this secondary access reduces the risk of procedural complications.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for observational studies comparing TAVR procedural complications in RA versus FA. Event rates were compared via weighted summary odds ratios using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Six manuscripts encompassing 6132 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that RA reduced the risk of major vascular complications (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.77, p < 0.001, I² 0%) and major/life-threatening bleeding (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.59, p < 0.001, I² 0%) as compared to FA for secondary TAVR access. We also observed a reduction 30-day mortality (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.79, p = 0.001, I² 0%), acute kidney injury (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.60, p < 0.001, I² 0%), and stroke and transient ischemic attack (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.67, p < 0.001, I² 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

RA reduced the risk of major vascular and bleeding complications when compared to FA for secondary access in TAVR. RA is associated with reduced risk of other adverse outcomes including mortality, but these associations may be related to selection bias and confounding given the observational study designs.

Updates on the Latest Surgical Approach of the Aortic Stenosis

Over the last twenty years, we marked significant progresses in the field of tissue engineering and the development of new aortic valve structural and delivery systems. These continuous iterations on the field, have completely changed the surgical indications and approaches for AVR. Nowadays, therapeutic decisions are endorsed by international guidelines; however, new technical advances need a new integrated approach. The clinical scenarios issued from the interaction between the Guidelines and the newest approaches and technologies are regularly on debate by the Heart Team. We will present some of our most encountered situations and the pattern of our therapeutic decisions. To easily navigate through Guidelines and clinical scenarios, we reported in this review a simplified and easy to use Clinical decision-making algorithm that may be a valuable tool in our daily practice.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: All Transfemoral? Update on Peripheral Vascular Access and Closure

Transfemoral access remains the most widely used peripheral vascular approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Despite technical improvement and reduction in delivery sheath diameters of all TAVI platforms, 10-20% of patients remain not eligible to transfemoral TAVI due to peripheral artery disease. In this review, we aim at presenting an update of recent data concerning transfemoral access and percutaneous closure devices. Moreover, we will review peripheral non-transfemoral alternative as well as caval-aortic accesses and discuss the important features to assess with pre-procedural imaging modalities before TAVI.

Evaluation and Management of Aortic Stenosis in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Aortic stenosis with concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a clinical challenge. Aortic stenosis is more prevalent and progresses more rapidly and unpredictably in CKD, and the presence of CKD is associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement. Because patients with advanced CKD and end-stage kidney disease have been excluded from randomized trials, clinicians need to make complex management decisions in this population that are based on retrospective and observational evidence. This statement summarizes the epidemiological and pathophysiological characteristics of aortic stenosis in the context of CKD, evaluates the nuances and prognostic information provided by noninvasive cardiovascular imaging with echocardiography and advanced imaging techniques, and outlines the special risks in this population. Furthermore, this statement provides a critical review of the existing literature pertaining to clinical outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in this high-risk population to help guide clinical decision making in the choice of aortic valve replacement and specific prosthesis. Finally, this statement provides an approach to the perioperative management of these patients, with special attention to a multidisciplinary heart-kidney collaborative team-based approach.

Patient selection, procedural planning and interventional guidance for transcatheter aortic valve intervention

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis across a broad spectrum of patient risk profiles. Pre-procedural planning using multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a fundamental component to ensure acute and long-term procedural success. MSCT can establish the procedural feasibility, the type vascular of approach as well as the device which is more likely to give a good result. Moreover, MSCT is a key tool to estimate the risk of potentially life-threatening complications. In this review, the role of MSCT for pre-procedural TAVR planning will be discussed providing a panoramic overview of the key elements that should be considered when performing TAVR. Additionally, the adjunctive role of fluoroscopy and echocardiography to plan and guide a TAVR procedure will also be discussed.

Transradial vs transfemoral secondary access outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures include bleeding, vascular complications, and strokes. These complications are often associated with the type of access used. The two types of access in TAVI procedures are primary and secondary. The main use of the primary access is for valve delivery, while secondary access is used for angiography and hemodynamic monitoring. While there are many options for primary access, those for secondary access are transfemoral and transradial. 

AIM

To compare outcomes between transradial vs transfemoral secondary access (TFSA).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using major databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar), which resulted in 5 studies that met the criteria for study selection. Outcomes of interest were 30-d rates each of major/life-threatening bleeding, vascular complications, strokes, and mortality. All 5 studies were observational. Only adjusted or matched data were used when available in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 5065 patients underwent TAVI, with 1453 patients (28.7%) having undergone transradial secondary access (TRSA) and 3612 patients (71.3%) TFSA. Irrespective of the site of primary access, the odds of having major or life-threatening bleeding were 60% lower in the TRSA group than the TFSA group (P < 0.00001). The odds of having major vascular complications were 52% lower in the TRSA group (P < 0.0001) with no difference in minor vascular complications between the 2 groups. Similarly, the odds of mortality in 30-d after the procedure were 41% lower (P = 0.006) and the odds of stroke were 54% lower (P = 0.001) in the TRSA group than the TFSA group.

CONCLUSION

The transradial secondary approach appears to be a safer alternative to the transfemoral secondary approach in TAVI procedures.

Same-Day Discharge After Transcatheter Native Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become the gold standard of care in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis and transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement seems to be an attractive alternative to redo surgery. We report the first case of concomitant transcatheter aortic valve replacement/transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement that was performed under conscious sedation who was subsequently discharged the same day. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

The "lend a hand" external bypass technique: External radial to femoral bypass for antegrade perfusion of an ischemic limb with occlusive large bore sheath - A novel and favorable approach

An occlusive large bore sheath is a frequently encountered situation in cases of cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Resultant acute limb ischemia could be a catastrophic complication which significantly affects the prognosis of an already sick patient population. A novel, yet simple, technique using the radial artery, instead of the ipsilateral or contralateral common femoral artery (CFA), as a donor vessel of an external bypass which provides antegrade perfusion to a limb with an occlusive large bore sheath is hereby described. Radial access (RA) has been shown to improve mortality in acute coronary syndrome; however, it is sometimes avoided by some operators in CS cases due to the possible appropriate need for MCS. This technique offers a substitution of a second CFA access for a RA in order to provide adequate ipsilateral limb perfusion. Hence, one can start a CS case with a default RA and perform peripheral angiography after diagnostic cardiac catheterization. If the peripheral vasculature is inappropriate for MCS, the patient would have already benefited from the mortality advantage of RA. If obstructive PAD is absent, then an occlusive Impella sheath can be placed in a CFA after antegrade ipsilateral superficial femoral artery (SFA) access is obtained for an external radial to femoral bypass, while the PCI is performed through the Impella sheath according to the single access PCI technique. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach are described and compared with each of the traditionally known external and internal femoral bypass techniques.

Shunting away from transradial arterial access?

Due to its increased safety and decrease in significant vascular complications and bleeding events, the use of the radial artery for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasing. Transradial access (TRA), however, is not without consequence. TRA arteries when used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are associated with decreased graft patency rates. Here we comment on a case report in which a patient developed a clinically significant arteriovenous fistula following TRA treated with surgical ligation. We offer insights on the increased use of the radial artery in both PCI and CABG.