Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction or Pulmonary Hypertension: Insights From the TriValve Registry

"Beyond 2D Echocardiography: A Novel Multiparametric Assessment of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair"

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) heart failure as assessed by RV to pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAc) is a prognostic marker in transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (T-TEER). However, quantification of RVPAc components by 2D echocardiography in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has significant limitations, and the traditional RVPAc parameter neglects the degree of volume overload/dilatation of the RV, which is another key clinical indicator for right ventricular dysfunction (RVD).Therefore, we aimed to assess RVD by a novel RVPAc parameter, including the three important drivers of RVD, for an improved prediction of 1-year mortality after T-TEER.

METHODS

We analyzed 262 patients undergoing T-TEER with complete 3D RV echocardiography and 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Increased 3D-RV enddiastolic volume (3D-RVEDV: HR 1.85; 1.10-3.12; p=0.020) and impaired RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.73, 1.02-2.92, p=0.042) predicted 1-year mortality. A novel RVPAc parameter [RVFWLS/(3D-RVEDV*sPAPinvasive)] including all 3 important drivers for RVD was developed, associating RVPA-uncoupling with a tripled risk for 1-year mortality (HR 3.19, 1.7-6.0, p<0.001). The novel RVPAc parameter significantly outperformed the traditional non-invasive RVPAc parameter in 1-year mortality prediction (c-index: 0.68 vs. 0.57 for novel vs. traditional non-invasive RVPAc; p=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel RVPAc parameter, integrating RV function, volume stress, and pressure stress is a powerful metric for RV failure and a superior predictor for survival post-T-TEER.

Comparative analysis of MitraClip/TriClip and PASCAL in transcatheter tricuspid valve repair for tricuspid regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The edge-to-edge transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) has emerged as a promising technique for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Despite its potential, comparative data on the performance of the novel edge-to-edge devices-MitraClip, PASCAL, and TriClip-remain controversial. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these devices in treating TR.

METHODS

Five databases were systematically searched up to May 2023, with an updated search conducted in May 2024. Only original studies were included in the analysis and were critically evaluated using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool for randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 2239 studies, out of which 21 studies were included in the final analysis. These studies encompassed a total of 2178 patients who underwent TTVR using either the MitraClip, TriClip, or PASCAL devices. The risk of bias across these studies ranged from moderate to high. No significant differences were found among the three devices in terms of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and tricuspid regurgitant volume. However, TriClip demonstrated statistically superior efficacy in reducing vena contracta compared to both MitraClip and PASCAL (P < 0.01) [TriClip: (MD = -7.4; 95% CI: -9.24, -5.56), MitraClip: (MD = -4.04; 95% CI: -5.03, -3.05), and PASCAL: (MD = -6.56; 95% CI: -7.76, -5.35)]. The procedural success rates and incidence of single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) were similar across all devices. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in mortality, stroke rates, or major bleeding events among the three devices.

CONCLUSION

The TriClip outperforms the MitraClip and PASCAL in reducing vena contracta width, indicating greater effectiveness for severe tricuspid regurgitation. All devices show similar safety profiles and procedural success rates. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Right Ventricular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

We assessed the safety profile of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction.

METHODS

We identified patients undergoing TEER to treat tricuspid regurgitation from June 2015 to October 2021 and assessed tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC). RV dysfunction was defined as TAPSE <17 mm and RVFAC <35%. The primary end point was 30-day mortality after TEER. We also investigated the change in the RV function in the early phase and clinical outcomes at 2 years.

RESULTS

The study participants (n=262) were at high surgical risk (EuroSCORE II, 6.2% [interquartile range, 4.0%-10.3%]). Among them, 44 patients met the criteria of RV dysfunction. Thirty-day mortality was 3.2% in patients with normal RV function and 2.3% in patients with RV dysfunction (P=0.99). Tricuspid regurgitation reduction to ≤2+ was consistently achieved irrespective of RV dysfunction (76.5% versus 70.5%; P=0.44). TAPSE and RVFAC declined after TEER in patients with normal RV function (TAPSE, 19.0±4.7 to 17.9±4.5 mm; P=0.001; RVFAC, 46.2%±8.1% to 40.3%±9.7%; P<0.001). In contrast, those parameters were unchanged or tended to increase in patients with RV dysfunction (TAPSE, 13.2±2.3 to 15.3±4.7 mm; P=0.011; RVFAC, 29.6%±4.1% to 31.6%±8.3%; P=0.14). Two years after TEER, compared with patients with normal RV function, patients with RV dysfunction had significantly higher mortality (27.0% versus 56.3%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TEER was safe and feasible to treat tricuspid regurgitation in patients with RV dysfunction. The decline in the RV function was observed in patients with normal RV function but not in patients with RV dysfunction.

The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Tricuspid valve disease is an often underrecognized clinical problem that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, patients will often present late in their disease course with severe right-sided heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and life-limiting symptoms that have few durable treatment options. Traditionally, the only treatment for tricuspid valve disease has been medical therapy or surgery; however, there have been increasing interest and success with the use of transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies over the past several years to treat patients with previously limited therapeutic options. The tricuspid valve is complex anatomically, lying adjacent to important anatomic structures such as the right coronary artery and the atrioventricular node, and is the passageway for permanent pacemaker leads into the right ventricle. In addition, the mechanism of tricuspid pathology varies widely between patients, which can be due to primary, secondary, or a combination of causes, meaning that it is not possible for 1 type of device to be suitable for treatment of all cases of tricuspid valve disease. To best visualize the pathology, several modalities of advanced cardiac imaging are often required, including transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, to best visualize the pathology. This detailed imaging provides important information for choosing the ideal transcatheter treatment options for patients with tricuspid valve disease, taking into account the need for the lifetime management of the patient. This review highlights the important background, anatomic considerations, therapeutic options, and future directions with regard to treatment of tricuspid valve disease.

Prediction of Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions: Validation of TRISCORE

BACKGROUND

Data on the prognostic role of the TRI-SCORE in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the TRI-SCORE in predicting outcomes of patients undergoing TTVI.

METHODS

TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) is a large multicenter multinational registry including patients undergoing TTVI. The TRI-SCORE is a risk model recently proposed to predict in-hospital mortality after tricuspid valve surgery. The TriValve population was stratified based on the TRI-SCORE tertiles. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization. Procedural complications and changes in NYHA functional class were also reported.

RESULTS

Among the 634 patients included, 223 patients (35.2%) had a TRI-SCORE between 0 and 5, 221 (34.8%) had 6 or 7, and 190 (30%) had ≥8 points. Postprocedural blood transfusion, acute kidney injury, new atrial fibrillation, and in-hospital mortality were more frequent in the highest TRI-SCORE tertile. Postprocedure length of stay increased with a TRI-SCORE increase. A TRI-SCORE ≥8 was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint assessed at a median follow-up of 186 days (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.38-6.55; HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.78-4.13; HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.57-2.74, respectively) even after adjustment for procedural success and EuroSCORE II or Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality. The NYHA functional class improved across all TRI-SCORE values.

CONCLUSIONS

In the TriValve registry, the TRI-SCORE has a suboptimal performance in predicting clinical outcomes. However, a TRISCORE ≥8 is associated with an increased risk of clinical events and a lack of prognostic benefit after successful TTVI.

Changes in right ventricular function and clinical outcomes following tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

AIMS

Prognostic impact of post-procedural changes in right ventricular (RV) function after tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) is still unclear. We investigated association of RV function and its post-procedural changes with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing T-TEER.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed 204 patients who underwent T-TEER and echocardiographic follow-up at 3 months after T-TEER. RV function was assessed by RV fractional area change (RVFAC), and RV dysfunction was defined as RVFAC <35%. Patients with an increase in RVFAC from baseline to the follow-up were considered as RV responders. Patients were divided into four groups according to baseline RVFAC and the RV responder. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure within 1 year. Forty-five of 204 patients (22.1%) had RVFAC <35% at baseline, and 71 (34.8%) were RV responders. The association between the RV responder and the composite outcome had a significant interaction with RVFAC at baseline. Among patients with baseline RVFAC <35%, RV responders had a lower risk of the composite outcome than RV non-responders, while this association was not significant in those with baseline RVFAC ≥35%. Among patients with baseline RVFAC <35%, a smaller RV diameter and a greater reduction of tricuspid regurgitation were predictors for the RV responder.

CONCLUSION

Post-procedural increase in RVFAC after T-TEER is associated with improved outcomes in patients with RV dysfunction. The factors related to the increase in RVFAC may support patient selection for T-TEER in patients with RV dysfunction.

Right ventricle assessment before tricuspid valve interventions

In the latest ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease, right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid annulus dilatation were reported to be the most important parameters to consider in patient selection for tricuspid valve interventions. Indeed, comprehensive right ventricular assessment is crucial in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who may benefit from transcatheter or surgical procedures. However, the only guideline parameter considered for intervention has been tricuspid annular dilatation in the presence of at least mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation, with no other right ventricular markers used in the decision-making process for invasive treatment. Notably, challenges in the assessment of right ventricular function may limit establishing thresholds for defining right ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the prognostic significance of right ventricular function in patients with tricuspid regurgitation undergoing percutaneous or surgical interventions.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of chronic right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC

Right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation are common and strongly associated with poor quality of life and an increased risk of heart failure hospitalizations and death. While medical therapy for right-sided heart failure is limited, treatment options for tricuspid regurgitation include surgery and, based on recent developments, several transcatheter interventions. However, the patients who might benefit from tricuspid valve interventions are yet unknown, as is the ideal time for these treatments given the paucity of clinical evidence. In this context, it is crucial to elucidate aetiology and pathophysiological mechanisms leading to right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation in order to recognize when tricuspid regurgitation is a mere bystander and when it can cause or contribute to heart failure progression. Notably, early identification of right heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation may be crucial and optimal management requires knowledge about the different mechanisms and causes, clinical course and presentation, as well as possible treatment options. The aim of this clinical consensus statement is to summarize current knowledge about epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment of tricuspid regurgitation in right-sided heart failure providing practical suggestions for patient identification and management.

Tricuspid Regurgitation: From Imaging to Clinical Trials to Resolving the Unmet Need for Treatment

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a highly prevalent and heterogeneous valvular disease, independently associated with excess mortality and high morbidity in all clinical contexts. TR is profoundly undertreated by surgery and is often discovered late in patients presenting with right-sided heart failure. To address the issue of undertreatment and poor clinical outcomes without intervention, numerous structural tricuspid interventional devices have been and are in development, a challenging process due to the unique anatomic and physiological characteristics of the tricuspid valve, and warranting well-designed clinical trials. The path from routine practice TR detection to appropriate TR evaluation, to conduction of clinical trials, to enriched therapeutic possibilities for improving TR access to treatment and outcomes in routine practice is complex. Therefore, this paper summarizes the key points and methods crucial to TR detection, quantitation, categorization, risk-scoring, intervention-monitoring, and outcomes evaluation, particularly of right-sided function, and to clinical trial development and conduct, for both interventional and surgical groups.

Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation: Current Understanding and Novel Treatment Options

Managing patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains extremely challenging, with a lack of consensus on when and how to treat it. Tricuspid valve pathology has been disregarded for a very long time because of the established belief that treating left-sided heart diseases would lead to the resolution or significant improvement of TR. Initially considered benign, severe TR has been found to be a strong predictor of prognosis. Despite the increasing prevalence and the disabling nature of this disease, the great majority of patients with clinically significant TR have seldom been considered for structural interventions. Numerous surgical and transcatheter treatment options are now available; however, optimal timing and procedural selection remain crucial aspects influencing outcomes. According to recent evidence in the literature, early referral is associated with good short and long-term outcomes, and various predictors of favorable outcomes following either surgical or transcatheter treatment have been identified. Evaluation by a multidisciplinary heart team with expertise in tricuspid valve disease is of paramount importance to identify adequate treatment for every patient.

Tricuspid Regurgitation Management for Heart Failure

There is growing evidence that severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) impacts clinical outcomes in a variety of cardiovascular disease states. The late presentation of patients with advanced TR highlights the underappreciation of the disease, as well as the pitfalls of current guideline-directed medical management. Given the high in-hospital mortality associated with isolated tricuspid valve surgery, transcatheter options continue to be explored with the hope of improved survival and reduced heart failure hospitalizations. In this review, we explore the physiology of TR, discuss the etiologic classes of TR, and explore the transcatheter options for treatment and who might benefit from device therapy.

Assessment of cardio-renal-hepatic function in patients with valvular heart disease: a multi-biomarker approach-the cardio-renal-hepatic score

BACKGROUND

Valvular heart disease (VHD) can cause damage to extra-cardiac organs, and lead to multi-organ dysfunction. However, little is known about the cardio-renal-hepatic co-dysfunction, as well as its prognostic implications in patients with VHD. The study sought to develop a multi-biomarker index to assess heart, kidney, and liver function in an integrative fashion, and investigate the prognostic role of cardio-renal-hepatic function in VHD.

METHODS

Using a large, contemporary, prospective cohort of 6004 patients with VHD, the study developed a multi-biomarker score for predicting all-cause mortality based on biomarkers reflecting heart, kidney, and liver function (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], creatinine, and albumin). The score was externally validated in another contemporary, prospective cohort of 3156 patients with VHD.

RESULTS

During a median follow up of 731 (704-748) days, 594 (9.9%) deaths occurred. Increasing levels of NT-proBNP, creatinine, and albumin were independently and monotonically associated with mortality, and a weighted multi-biomarker index, named the cardio-renal-hepatic (CRH) score, was developed based on Cox regression coefficients of these biomarkers. The CRH score was a strong and independent predictor of mortality, with 1-point increase carrying over two times of mortality risk (overall adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.095 [1.891-2.320], P < 0.001). The score provided complementary prognostic information beyond conventional risk factors (C index: 0.78 vs 0.81; overall net reclassification improvement index [95% confidence interval]: 0.255 [0.204-0.299]; likelihood ratio test P < 0.001), and was identified as the most important predictor of mortality by the proportion of explainable log-likelihood ratio χ² statistics, the best subset analysis, as well as the random survival forest analysis in most types of VHD. The predictive performance of the score was also demonstrated in patients under conservative treatment, with normal left ventricular systolic function, or with primary VHD. It achieved satisfactory discrimination (C index: 0.78 and 0.72) and calibration in both derivation and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-biomarker index was developed to assess cardio-renal-hepatic function in patients with VHD. The cardio-renal-hepatic co-dysfunction is a powerful predictor of mortality and should be considered in clinical management decisions.

New therapeutic approach for tricuspid regurgitation: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement or repair

The tricuspid valve is a complex structure with normal function dependent on the leaflet morphology, right atrial and annular dynamics, and right ventricular and chordal support. Thus, the pathophysiology of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is equally complex and current medical and surgical management options are limited. Transcatheter devices are currently being investigated as possible treatment options with lower morbidity and mortality than open surgical procedures. These devices can be divided by their implant location/mechanism of action: leaflet approximation devices, annuloplasty devices, orthotopic valve implants, and heterotopic valve implants. The current review will discuss each class of transcatheter device therapy, and further delve into the current understanding of who and when to treat. Finally, we will include a brief discussion of the future of device and surgical therapy trials for TR and the remaining questions to answer about this complex disease process.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair in Prohibitive Risk Patients: Impact on Quality of Life and Major Organ Systems

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous repair for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is emerging as a viable option, but patient selection is challenging and predetermined by comorbidities. This study evaluated mid-term outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) in very sick inoperable patients and explored the concept of risk-based therapeutic futility.

METHODS

TTVR patients treated in our centre were prospectively assigned to prohibitive-risk (PR) and high-risk (HR) subgroups, based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score, frailty indices, and major organ system compromise. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared at baseline, 30 days, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (mean age 81.9 ± 5.1 years) completed follow-up from May 2021 to March 2022: 18 PR (mean STS Score 15.5 ± 7%) and 15 HR (mean STS Score 6.4 ± 1.7%). The primary efficacy end point of at least 1 grade of TR reduction by 30 days was recorded in 93.9% of all patients, with no device-related adverse events. Improvement in initial New York Heart Association functional class III/IV occurred in 74% of PR and 93% of HR patients. Six-minute walk test increased by 81 ± 43.6 metres (P < 0.001) and 85.8 ± 47.9 metres (P < 0.001), respectively. Renal function tests improved by 15% (P = 0.048) and 7% (P = 0.050), while liver enzymes decreased by 18% (P = 0.020) and 28% (P = 0.052). Right ventricular systolic function increased in both subgroups by at least 24% (P < 0.001). Six-month mortality was 12.1%, with 6 hospitalisations for acute heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

TR reduction significantly affected quality of life, functional capacity, cardiac remodelling, and multiorgan involvement similarly in PR and HR patients. TTVR is feasible in very sick symptomatic patients, regardless of predicted risk.

Heterotopic Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement in a Patient With Carcinoid Heart Disease

Neuroendocrine tumors can lead to carcinoid heart disease with subsequent development of severe tricuspid regurgitation due to thickening and restriction of the tricuspid leaflets. We present a patient who underwent successful heterotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for torrential tricuspid regurgitation due to carcinoid heart disease. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Indications, Limitations, and Development of Tricuspid Valve Interventions in Adults

Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with excessive mortality and poor outcomes regardless of the cause and associated comorbidities. Despite this clear association with mortality, tricuspid valve diseases remain undertreated. Tricuspid valve surgery, either repair or replacement, has shown little detectable survival benefit. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions have emerged as a less invasive approach to tricuspid valve diseases. They can be categorised into coaptation devices, annuloplasty devices, transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement, heterotopic caval valve implantation, and tricuspid valve-in-valve. Despite the late referral and the patient's profile, results remain fairly acceptable at least in the short term, with good procedural device success, excellent safety profile, and sustained reduction of tricuspid regurgitation for up to 1 year. Because results are limited to the mid-term, transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention durability will need to be established before broader adoption of these technologies.

Transcatheter and surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: Predicting right ventricular decompensation and favorable responders

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has gained increasing recognition in recent years both in the surgical and in the cardiological community. Left untreated, isolated TR significantly worsens survival. Despite being a strong predictor of negative prognosis, interventions to correct TR are rarely performed due to increased surgical risk and late patient presentation. Recently, the ultimate focus has been on patient selection, surgical or transcatheter indication, and correct timing. Furthermore, of paramount importance is the identification of predictors of outcome following treatment, in order to discriminate between favorable and unfavorable responders and guide the decision-making process of the most adequate treatment for every patient.

Tricuspid valve replacement: The old and the new

Tricuspid regurgitation is a frequent and serious condition but tricuspid valve (TV) surgery, that may be a valve replacement when a repair is not feasible, is rarely performed. Recent development of transcatheter TV interventions offers new options for those high-surgical risk patients, especially TV replacement for patients who are not eligible for transcatheter TV repair. In this review, we describe indications and outcome after surgical TV replacement, and devices available or in development for transcatheter TV replacement.

Solving the Pulmonary Hypertension Paradox in Patients With Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation by Employing Artificial Intelligence

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to improve echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients presenting with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

BACKGROUND

Echocardiographic assessment of PH in patients with severe TR carries several pitfalls for underestimation, hence concealing the true severity of PH in very sick patients in particular, and ultimately obscuring the impact of PH on survival after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI).

METHODS

All patients in this study underwent TTVI for severe TR between 2016 and 2020. To predict the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) solely based on echocardiographic parameters, we trained an extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm. The derivation cohort was constituted by 116 out of 162 patients with both echocardiography and right heart catheterization data, preprocedurally obtained, from a bicentric registry. Moreover, 142 patients from an independent institution served for external validation.

RESULTS

Systolic pulmonary artery pressure was consistently underestimated by echocardiography in comparison to right heart catheterization (40.3 ± 15.9 mm Hg vs 44.1 ± 12.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0066), and the assessment was most discrepant among patients with severe defects of the tricuspid valve and impaired right ventricular systolic function. Using 9 echocardiographic parameters as input variables, an XGB algorithm could reliably predict mPAP levels (R = 0.96, P < 2.2 × 10^-16). Moreover, patients with elevations in predicted mPAP levels ≥29.9 mm Hg showed significantly reduced 2-year survival after TTVI (58.3% [95% CI: 41.7%-81.6%] vs 78.8% [95% CI: 68.7%-90.5%]; P = 0.026). Importantly, the poor prognosis associated with elevation in predicted mPAP levels was externally confirmed (HR for 2-year mortality: 2.9 [95% CI: 1.5-5.7]; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

PH in patients with severe TR can be reliably assessed based on echocardiographic parameters in conjunction with an XGB algorithm, and elevations in predicted mPAP levels translate into increased mortality after TTVI.

Cardiohepatic Syndrome Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Valve Repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic implications of cardiohepatic syndrome (CHS) in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair (T-TEER).

BACKGROUND

The role of CHS in patients undergoing T-TEER for severe TR has not been studied.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent T-TEER for TR between 2016 and 2020 at 2 high-volume academic centers. CHS was defined as elevation of at least 2 of 3 cholestatic hepatic enzymes. The impact of CHS on 1-year all-cause mortality and clinical outcomes after T-TEER was investigated.

RESULTS

T-TEER reduced TR severity to ≤2+ in 257 of 305 included patients (86.2%). CHS was present in 45.2% of patients and was associated with a higher rate of mortality and of first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) (CHS vs no CHS: estimated 1-year mortality, 34.0% vs 15.9% [P < 0.01]; HHF, 23.0% vs 12.2% [P = 0.01]). CHS was identified as an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality (HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.10-3.14; P < 0.05). Irrespective of CHS, T-TEER improved New York Heart Association functional class and 6-minute walk distance in the majority of patients. In patients with impaired baseline hepatic function, laboratory liver parameters improved after T-TEER.

CONCLUSIONS

CHS is a strong predictor of mortality and HHF after T-TEER and should be evaluated in the process of procedural decision making for T-TEER. Nevertheless, T-TEER is associated with relevant symptomatic alleviation irrespective of CHS.

Reduction in Right Atrial Pressures Is Associated With Hemodynamic Improvements After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Tricuspid Valve

BACKGROUND

Investigational transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has shown promise as an alternative to surgery, but factors influencing outcomes, optimal patient selection, and procedural timing remain incompletely defined. Given the limitations of determining TR severity by conventional echocardiography, our objectives were to determine whether invasive right atrial (RA) pressures performed during the procedure are related to patient outcomes.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of patients who underwent off-label tricuspid TEER using MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) for significant TR at a single institution. Intraprocedural mean RA pressure, RA peak V-wave, RA pressure nadir, and systolic increase in RA pressure (XV height) were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent tricuspid TEER; 33 underwent concomitant mitral TEER for mitral regurgitation. The study cohort was 39% female with a mean age of 78.6±14.3 years. Median follow-up was 339 days (interquartile range, 100-601). Any reduction in mean RA pressure, RA peak V-wave, RA nadir, and XV height occurred in 74%, 82%, 45%, and 87% of patients, respectively. At 1 year, event-free survival was 47%. Postprocedure XV height correlated with TR severity as determined by echocardiography (P<0.0001). The highest quartile of postprocedure XV height (>8 mm Hg) had worse event-free survival compared with those who had concluding XV height ≤8 mm Hg (P=0.02). Attainment of a concluding XV height less than or equal to median value was associated with a lower creatinine the next day (1.27±0.47 versus 1.64±0.47 mg/dL, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraprocedural XV height correlates with TR severity after tricuspid TEER, and lower concluding pressures are associated with improved outcomes. Analysis of RA pressures may serve as a complementary tool for the evaluation of disease severity and procedural guidance.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: Current devices and associated evidence

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common finding in patients with chronic cardiopathy, and often a marker of an advanced disease. Being silent or with symptoms intertwined with the primitive left heart disease, TR has often been neglected, leading to the late referral of patients with advanced right-heart failure. Hence, isolated tricuspid surgery has been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, the worse of all valve interventions, and medical management has been limited to symptomatic treatment. In this context, percutaneous therapies for severe TR have gained traction, addressing the unmet therapeutic gap for a less invasive disease-modifying management. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview on transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions, focusing on devices' characteristics, associated evidence, and future perspectives.

Tricuspid Annuloplasty: Transcatheter Approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New transcatheter techniques to perform tricuspid annuloplasty are evolving and are introduced into the clinical routine. Yet, clinical experience is limited.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, 3 different techniques for tricuspid annuloplasty have been used in larger clinical cohorts. They can be divided into direct annuloplasty techniques and suture plication techniques. The largest clinical evidence is related to direct annuloplasty techniques. It has been shown that annular dimensions can be effectively reduced. This translates into an improvement of the degree of tricuspid regurgitation and improvement of clinical symptoms. Due to the newness of this type of therapy, long-term data is limited, but for one of the described techniques, published data show that the positive effects persist over a 2-year period. Transcatheter approaches are safe and are able to treat tricuspid regurgitation effectively. There are still differences in the efficacy of the different techniques. Clinical experience varies among the different approaches.