Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Symptomatic, Non-Limb-Threatening Peripheral Artery Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review

Long-term patient-reported outcomes among patients undergoing revascularization vs medical therapy for intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVE

Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend revascularization for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) if it can improve patient function and quality of life. However, it is still unclear if patients with IC achieve a significant functional benefit from surgery compared with medical management alone. This study examines the relationship between IC treatment modality (operative vs nonoperative optimal medical management) and patient-reported outcomes for physical function (PROMIS-PF) and satisfaction in social roles and activities (PROMIS-SA).

METHODS

We identified patients with IC who presented for index evaluation in a vascular surgery clinic at an academic medical center between 2016 and 2021. Patients were stratified based on whether they underwent a revascularization procedure during follow-up vs continued nonoperative management with medication and recommended exercise therapy. We used linear mixed-effect models to assess the relationship between treatment modality and PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-SA, and ankle-brachial index (ABI) over time, clustering among repeat patient observations. Models were adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Clinical Frailty Score, tobacco use, and index ABI.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients with IC were identified, of which 40% (n = 89) underwent revascularization procedures (42% bypass; 58% peripheral vascular intervention) and 60% (n = 136) continued nonoperative management. Patients were followed up to 6.9 years, with an average follow-up of 5.2 ± 1.6 years. Patients who underwent revascularization were more likely to be clinically frail (P = .03), have a lower index ABI (0.55 ± 0.24 vs 0.72 ± 0.28; P < .001), and lower baseline PROMIS-PF score (36.72 ± 8.2 vs 40.40 ± 6.73; P = .01). There were no differences in patient demographics or medications between treatment groups. Examining patient-reported outcome trends over time; there were no significant differences in PROMIS-PF between groups, trends over time, or group differences over time after adjusting for covariates (P = .07, P = .13, and P =.08, respectively). However, all patients with IC significantly increased their PROMIS-SA over time (adjusted P = .019), with patients managed nonoperatively more likely to have an improvement in PROMIS-SA over time than those who underwent revascularization (adjusted P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported outcomes associated with functional status and satisfaction in activities are similar for patients with IC for up to 7 years, irrespective of whether they undergo treatment with revascularization or continue nonoperative management. These findings support conservative long-term management for patients with IC.

Characterizing patient-reported claudication treatment goals to support patient-centered treatment selection and measurement strategies

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have been increasingly emphasized for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Patient-defined treatment goals and expectations, however, are poorly understood and might not be achievable or aligned with guidelines or clinical outcomes. We evaluated the patient-reported treatment goals among patients with claudication and the associations between patient characteristics, goals, and PAD-specific PRO scores.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of claudication were prospectively recruited. Patient-defined treatment goals and outcomes related to walking distance, duration, and speed were quantified using multiple-choice survey items. Free-text items were used to identify activities other than walking distance, duration, or speed associated with symptoms and treatment goals. The peripheral artery disease quality of life and walking impairment questionnaire instruments were included as PRO. The treatment goal categories were compared with the PRO percentile scores using 95% confidence intervals (CIs), categorical tests, and logistic regression models. Associations between the patient characteristics and PRO were evaluated using linear and ordinal logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the present study. Of these 150 patients, 144 (96%) viewed the entire survey. Their mean age was 70.0 ± 11.3 years, and 32.9% were women. Most of the respondents had self-reported their race as White (n = 135), followed by Black (n = 3), Asian (n = 2), Native American (n = 2), and other/unknown (n = 2). Two participants self-reported Hispanic ethnicity. The primary treatment goals were an increased walking distance or duration without stopping (62.0%), the ability to perform a specific activity or task (23.0%), an increased walking speed (8.0%), or other/none of the above (7.0%). The specific activities associated with symptoms or goals included outdoor recreation (38.5%), labor-related tasks (30.7%), sports (26.9%), climbing stairs (23.1%), uphill walking (19.2%), and shopping (6%). Among the patients choosing an increased walking distance and duration as the primary goals, 64% had indicated that a distance of ≥0.5 mile (2640 ft) and 59% had indicated a duration of ≥30 minutes would be a minimum increase consistent with meaningful improvement. Increasing age was associated with lower odds of a distance improvement goal of ≥0.5 mile (odds ratio [OR], 0.68 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92; P = .012) or duration improvement goal of ≥30 minutes (OR, 0.76 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99; P = .047). Patient characteristics associated with PAD Quality of Life percentile scores included age, ankle brachial index, and gender. Ankle brachial index was the only patient characteristic associated with the walking impairment questionnaire percentile scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients define treatment goals according to their desired activities and expectations, which may influence their goals and perceived outcomes. Patients' expectations of minimum increases in walking distance and duration consistent with meaningful improvement exceeded reported minimum important difference criteria for many patients and would not be captured using common clinic-based walking tests. Patient age was associated with both treatment goals and PRO scores, and the related floor and ceiling effects could influence sensitivity to PRO changes for younger and older patients, respectively. Heterogeneity in treatment goals supports consideration of tailored decision-making and outcomes informed by patient characteristics and perspectives.

One-Year Follow-Up of Vascular Intervention Trials Disrupted by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Use-Case landscape

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic had an unprecedented impact on cardiovascular clinical research. The decision-making and state of study operations in cardiovascular trials 1-year after interruption has not been previously described.

METHODS

In the spring of 2020, we created a pandemic impact task force to develop a landscape of use case scenarios from 17 device trials of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) interventions. In conjunction with publicly available (clinictrials.gov) study inclusion criteria, primary endpoints and study design, information was shared for this use-case landscape by trial leadership and data owners.

RESULTS

A total of 17 actively enrolling trials (9 CAD and 8 PAD) volunteered to populate the use case landscape. All 17 were multicenter studies (12 in North America and 5 international). Fifteen studies were industry-sponsored, of which 13 were FDA approved IDEs, one was PCORI-sponsored and two were sponsored by the NIH. Enrollment targets ranged from 150 to 9000 pts. At the time of interruption, 5 trials were <20 % enrolled, 9 trials were 50-80 % enrolled and 3 trials were >80 % enrolled. At 1 year, the majority of studies were continuing to enroll in the context of more sporadic but ongoing pandemic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1 year from the first surge interruptions, most trials had resumed enrollment. Trials most heavily interrupted were trials early in enrollment and those trials not able to pivot to virtual patient and site visits. Further work is needed to determine the overall impact on vascular intervention trials disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Advancing Peripheral Artery Disease Quality of Care and Outcomes Through Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is chronic in nature, and individualized chronic disease management is a central focus of care. To accommodate this reality, tools to measure the impact and quality of the PAD care delivered are necessary. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and instruments to measure them, that is, PRO measures, have been well studied in the research and clinical trial context, but a shift toward integrating them into clinical practice has yet to take place. A framework to use PRO measures as indicators of the quality of PAD care delivered, that is, PRO performance measures (PRO-PMs), is provided in this scientific statement. Measurement goals to consider by PAD clinical phenotypes are provided, as well as an overview of potential benefits of adopting PRO-PMs in the clinical practice of PAD care, including reducing unwanted variability and promoting health equity. A central discussion with considerations for risk adjustment of PRO-PMs, individualized PAD care, and the need for patient engagement strategies is offered. Furthermore, necessary conditions in terms of required competencies and training to handle PRO-PM data are discussed because the interpretation and handling of these data come with great responsibility and consequences for designing care that adopts a broader framework of risk that goes beyond the inclusion of biomedical variables. To conclude, health system perspectives and an agenda to reach the next steps in the implementation of PRO-PMs in PAD care are offered.