"Frailty, thy name is woman": syndrome of women with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Characteristics of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis

Background

Many patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are undiagnosed, and UK general practice registers do not typically record heart failure (HF) subtype. Improvements in management of HFpEF is dependent on improved identification and characterisation of patients in primary care.

Aim

To describe a cohort of patients recruited from primary care with suspected HFpEF and compare patients in whom HFpEF was confirmed and refuted.

Design & setting

Baseline data from a longitudinal cohort study of patients with suspected HFpEF recruited from primary care in two areas of England.

Method

A screening algorithm and review were used to find patients on HF registers without a record of reduced ejection fraction (EF). Baseline evaluation included cardiac, mental and physical function, clinical characteristics, and patient reported outcomes. Confirmation of HFpEF was clinically adjudicated by a cardiologist.

Results

In total, 93 (61%) of 152 patients were confirmed HFpEF. The mean age of patients with HFpEF was 79 years, 46% were female, 80% had hypertension, and 37% took ≥10 medications. Patients with HFpEF were more likely to be obese, pre-frail or frail, report more dyspnoea and fatigue, were more functionally impaired, and less active than patients in whom HFpEF was refuted. Few had attended cardiac rehabilitation.

Conclusion

Patients with confirmed HFpEF had frequent multimorbidity, functional impairment, frailty, and polypharmacy. Although comorbid conditions were similar between people with and without HFpEF, the former had more obesity, symptoms, and worse physical function. These findings highlight the potential to optimise wellbeing through comorbidity management, medication rationalisation, rehabilitation, and supported self-management.

Effectiveness by gender and age of renin-angiotensin system blockade in heart failure-A national register-based cohort study

Purpose

Investigate effectiveness by gender and age and equity implications of treatment with renin‐angiotensin system blockade (RASb) in heart failure (HF) patients.

Methods

In this population‐based register study, we used inpatient data from 2006 to 2010 for patients age 20 years or older with no HF hospitalisation for minimum of 1 year before an index hospitalisation. A wash‐out period for RASb of 6 months preceding admission was used.

Hospital data were linked with drug dispensation data and cause of death data. The associations between time‐dependent RASb exposure and all‐cause death and HF death, respectively, were examined by Cox regression models. Interactions by gender and age were also investigated on the multiplicative and additive scales.

Results

Thirty thousand seven hundred twenty‐one patients were analysed. Fifty‐one percent were women. Median age was 83. Fifty‐three percent of women and 64% of men received RASb after the index hospitalisation. Younger patients were more likely to receive RASb than older ones. One‐year mortality was 28%. RASb was associated with an overall hazard ratio (HR) for all‐cause death of 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.69‐0.75), and an HR of 0.85 (0.77‐0.93) for HF death. Interaction analyses showed HRs for all‐cause death associated with RASb between 0.12 (0.10‐0.13) in the youngest, and 0.80 (0.76‐0.84) in the oldest patients.

Conclusions

RASb appeared effective for women and men and for patients of all ages in this hospitalised HF cohort. No gender difference in effectiveness was found. RASb exposure was low overall, indicating a need for improved adherence to treatment guidelines. Treatment with RASb may be inequitable for women and older patients.

Impact of Sex on Clinical Course and Survival in the Contemporary Treatment Era for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background

The relation of sex to clinical presentation and course in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains incompletely resolved. We assessed differences in clinical outcomes between men and women within our large HCM cohort.

Methods and Results

Of 2123 consecutive patients, a minority (38%) were women who were diagnosed with HCM at older ages or referred for subspecialty evaluation later than men (50±19 versus 44±16 and 55±18 versus 49±16; P<0.001). Women more commonly developed advanced New York Heart Association class III/IV symptoms (53% versus 35% in men; P<0.001), predominantly secondary to outflow obstruction. While end‐stage heart failure with systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%) was similar in men (5% versus 4% in women; P=0.33), women were 3‐fold more likely to develop heart failure with preserved systolic function (7.5% versus 2.6%; P=0.002). Sudden death events terminated by defibrillator therapy were similar in women (0.9%/year) versus men (1.0%/year; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.6–1.5; P=0.73). HCM mortality was uncommon, with identical rates in both sexes (0.3%/year; hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7–3.4;, P=0.25). Age‐adjusted all‐cause mortality also did not differ between women and men (1.7% versus 1.3%/year; hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.92–1.91; P=0.13).

Conclusions

Survival was not less favorable in women with HCM. Contemporary treatments including surgical myectomy to reverse heart failure and defibrillators to prevent sudden death, were effective in both sexes contributing to low mortality. However, despite more frequent outflow obstruction, women with HCM are underrecognized and referred to centers later than men, often with more advanced heart failure. Greater awareness of HCM in women should lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment, with implications for improved quality of life.

Excess Cardiovascular Risk in Women Relative to Men Referred for Coronary Angiography Is Associated With Severely Impaired Coronary Flow Reserve, Not Obstructive Disease

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) fatality rates are higher for women than for men, yet obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is less prevalent in women. Coronary flow reserve (CFR), an integrated measure of large- and small-vessel CAD and myocardial ischemia, identifies patients at risk for CVD death, but is not routinely measured in clinical practice. We sought to investigate the impact of sex, CFR, and angiographic CAD severity on adverse cardiovascular events.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n=329, 43% women) referred for invasive coronary angiography after stress testing with myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography and with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% were followed (median, 3.0 years) for a composite end point of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death and hospitalization for nonfatal myocardial infarction or heart failure. The extent and severity of angiographic CAD were estimated by using the CAD prognostic index, and CFR was quantified by using positron emission tomography.

RESULTS

Although women in comparison with men had lower pretest clinical scores, rates of prior myocardial infarction, and burden of angiographic CAD (P<0.001), they demonstrated greater risk of CVD events, even after adjustment for traditional risk factors, imaging findings, and early revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.02; P=0.03). Impaired CFR was similarly present among women and men, but in patients with low CFR (<1.6, n=163), women showed a higher frequency of nonobstructive CAD, whereas men showed a higher frequency of severely obstructive CAD (P=0.002). After also adjusting for CFR, the effect of sex on outcomes was no longer significant. When stratified by sex and CFR, only women with severely impaired CFR demonstrated significantly increased adjusted risk of CVD events (P<0.0001, P for interaction=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Women referred for coronary angiography had a significantly lower burden of obstructive CAD in comparison with men but were not protected from CVD events. Excess cardiovascular risk in women was independently associated with impaired CFR, representing a hidden biological risk, and a phenotype less amenable to revascularization. Impaired CFR, particularly absent severely obstructive CAD, may represent a novel target for CVD risk reduction.

Women and heart disease, the underrecognized burden: sex differences, biases, and unmet clinical and research challenges

For many years the significance of heart disease in women was vastly underappreciated, and women were significantly underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical research. We now know that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for women. Women and men share many similarities in the pathophysiology and manifestations of heart disease. However, as research advances with the continued inclusion of more women, knowledge about gender differences between the female and male heart, both on a physiological and pathophysiological basis, grows. These differences can be found in all domains of cardiovascular health and disease, including heart rhythm, heart failure, coronary disease and valvular disease. Further understanding of gender differences in the heart is crucial for advancing our ability to maintain a healthy population and identify and treat heart disease in both women and men. Specific examples within the spectrum of heart disease will be discussed in this review paper, and areas for further research will be proposed.

Sex Differences in the Management and Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is more common in women than in men; data characterizing sex differences in the management and outcomes of HFpEF patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry Emergency Module data linked to Medicare claims, we conducted a retrospective analysis of acute HF patients in the ED, identifying HFpEF (ejection fraction [EF] ≥40%) patients and stratifying by sex to compare baseline characteristics, ED therapies, hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and post-discharge outcomes. Of 4161 HFpEF patients, 2808 (67%) were women, who were more likely to be older and hypertensive, but less likely to be diabetic or smokers (all P < .01). Women more often presented with systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg (62.5% vs 56.4%; P = .0001) and higher EF. There were no sex differences in ED therapies, adjusted 30- and 180-day all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, or 30- and 180-day readmissions. After adjustment, women had longer LOS (0.40 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.70; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with HFpEF presenting to the ED were more likely to have elevated systolic blood pressure, but overall ED management strategies were similar to those in men. We observed adjusted differences in hospital LOS, but no differences in 30- and 180-day outcomes.