Addition of Blood Pressure and Weight Transmissions to Standard Remote Monitoring of Implantable Defibrillators and its Association with Mortality and Rehospitalization

Association of Remote Patient Monitoring with Mortality and Healthcare Utilization in Hypertensive Patients: a Medicare Claims-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension management is complex in older adults. Recent advances in remote patient monitoring (RPM) have warranted evaluation of RPM use and patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To study associations of RPM use with mortality and healthcare utilization measures of hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) utilization, and outpatient visits.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with an outpatient hypertension diagnosis between July 2018 and September 2020. The first date of RPM use with a corresponding hypertension diagnosis was recorded (index date). RPM non-users were documented from those with an outpatient hypertension diagnosis; a random visit was selected as the index date. Six months prior continuous enrollment was required.

MAIN MEASURES

Outcomes studied within 180 days of index date included (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) any hospitalization, (iii) cardiovascular-related hospitalization, (iv) non-cardiovascular-related hospitalization, (v) any ED, (vi) cardiovascular-related ED, (vii) non-cardiovascular-related ED, (viii) any outpatient, (ix) cardiovascular-related outpatient, and (x) non-cardiovascular-related outpatient. Patient demographics and clinical variables were collected from baseline and index date. Propensity score matching (1:4) and Cox regression were performed. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.

KEY RESULTS

The matched sample had 16,339 and 63,333 users and non-users, respectively. Cumulative incidences of mortality outcome were 2.9% (RPM) and 4.3% (non-RPM), with a HR (95% CI) of 0.66 (0.60-0.74). RPM users had lower hazards of any [0.78 (0.75-0.82)], cardiovascular-related [0.79 (0.73-0.87)], and non-cardiovascular-related [0.79 (0.75-0.83)] hospitalizations. No significant association was observed between RPM use and the three ED measures. RPM users had higher hazards of any [1.10 (1.08-1.11)] and cardiovascular-related outpatient visits [2.17 (2.13-2.19)], while a slightly lower hazard of non-cardiovascular-related outpatient visits [0.94 (0.93-0.96)].

CONCLUSIONS

RPM use was associated with substantial reductions in hazards of mortality and hospitalization outcomes with an increase in cardiovascular-related outpatient visits.

Effect of remote monitoring on patient-reported outcomes in European heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial

AIMS

The European REMOTE-CIED study is the first randomized trial primarily designed to evaluate the effect of remote patient monitoring (RPM) on patient-reported outcomes in the first 2 years after implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The sample consisted of 595 European heart failure patients implanted with an ICD compatible with the Boston Scientific LATITUDE® RPM system. Patients were randomized to RPM plus a yearly in-clinic ICD check-up vs. 3-6-month in-clinic check-ups alone. At five points during the 2-year follow-up, patients completed questionnaires including the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) to assess their heart failure-specific health status and ICD acceptance, respectively. Information on clinical status was obtained from patients' medical records. Linear regression models were used to compare scores between groups over time. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed no significant group differences in patients' health status and ICD acceptance (subscale) scores (all Ps > 0.05). Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated a temporary improvement in device acceptance (FPAS total score) at 6-month follow-up for secondary prophylactic in-clinic patients only (P < 0.001). No other significant subgroup differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Large clinical trials have indicated that RPM can safely and effectively replace most in-clinic check-ups of ICD patients. The REMOTE-CIED trial results show that patient-reported health status and ICD acceptance do not differ between patients on RPM and patients receiving in-clinic check-ups alone in the first 2 years after ICD implantation.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01691586.

Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and resynchronization devices to improve patient outcomes: dead end or way ahead?

Remote monitoring (RM) has become a new standard of care in the follow-up of patients with implantable pacemakers and defibrillators. While it has been consistently shown that RM enables earlier detection of clinically actionable events compared with traditional in-patient evaluation, this advantage did not translate into improved patient outcomes in clinical trials of RM except one study using daily multiparameter telemonitoring in heart failure (HF) patients. Therefore, this review, focusing on RM studies of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in patients with HF, discusses possible explanations for the differences in trial outcomes. Patient selection may play an important role as more severe HF and concomitant atrial fibrillation have been associated with improved outcomes by RM. Furthermore, the technical set-up of RM may have an important impact as a higher level of connectivity with more frequent data transmission can be linked to better outcomes. Finally, there is growing evidence as to the need of effective algorithms ensuring a fast and well-structured clinical response to the events detected by RM. These factors re-emphasize the potential of remote management of device patients with HF and call for continued clinical research and technical development in the field.

Non-invasive home lung impedance monitoring in early post-acute heart failure discharge: Three case reports

BACKGROUND

Patients discharged after hospitalization for acute heart failure (AHF) are frequently readmitted due to an incomplete decongestion, which is difficult to assess clinically. Recently, it has been shown that the use of a highly sensitive, non-invasive device measuring lung impedance (LI) reduces hospitalizations for heart failure (HF); it has also been shown that this device reduces the cardiovascular and all-cause mortality of stable HF patients when used in long-term out-patient follow-ups. The aim of these case series is to demonstrate the potential additive role of non-invasive home LI monitoring in the early post-discharge period.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case series of three patients who had performed daily LI measurements at home using the edema guard monitor (EGM) during 30 d after an episode of AHF. All patients had a history of chronic ischemic HF with a reduced ejection fraction and were hospitalized for 6–17 d. LI measurements were successfully made at home by patients with the help of their caregivers. The patients were carefully followed up by HF specialists who reacted to the values of LI measurements, blood pressure, heart rate and clinical symptoms. LI reduction was a more frequent trigger to medication adjustments compared to changes in symptoms or vital signs. Besides, LI dynamics closely tracked the use and dose of diuretics.

CONCLUSION

Our case series suggests non-invasive home LI monitoring with EGM to be a reliable and potentially useful tool for the early detection of congestion or dehydration and thus for the further successful stabilization of a HF patient after a worsening episode.

Increasing Role of Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices in Improving Outcomes

Remote monitoring has become an essential component of the care of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device, including those undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantations. It allows for earlier detection of battery- and lead-related issue, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, and may facilitate early identification of patients at risk for developing an exacerbation of heart failure. The data for the clinical utility of remote monitoring have been mixed. Additional studies are ongoing to determine how best to detect heart failure in these patients and how best to manage these patients based on the information.