Device Therapy of Hypertension

Device's design and clinical perspectives for resistant hypertension therapy

Introduction

Hypertension is the leading cause of death in the cardiovascular system. Indeed, untreated hypertension can affect one's general health, but medicine can help hypertensive people reduce their chance of developing high blood pressure. However, secondary hypertension remains an unresolved illness.

Areas covered

This review will go through the typical and unusual device-based therapies for resistant hypertension that have arisen in recent years. Further to that, the innovations developed in device-based RH treatment will be covered, as well as the research and studies assessing these novel technologies.

Expert opinion

The innovative device-based techniques that target resistant hypertension provide a potential therapy that has been backed by a number of studies and clinical trials, whereas pharmacological non-adherence and increased sympathetic activity are recognized to be the primary causes of resistant hypertension. Nevertheless, some limitations will be critical for the future of these RH systems, with the device's design and larger RCTs playing a significant role in determining whether a position in routine treatment could be warranted.

Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications.

OBJECTIVES

This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications.

METHODS

SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis.

RESULTS

The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; -6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; -4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: -0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: -2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: -4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control. (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study [Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications]; NCT02439775).

Alcohol-mediated renal denervation in patients with hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound and radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) have been shown to safely lower blood pressure (BP) in hypertension.

AIMS

The TARGET BP OFF-MED trial investigated the efficacy and safety of alcohol-mediated renal denervation (RDN) in the absence of antihypertensive medications.

METHODS

This randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial was conducted in 25 centres in Europe and the USA. Patients with a 24-hour systolic BP of 135-170 mmHg, an office systolic BP 140-180 mmHg and diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg on 0-2 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour systolic BP at 8 weeks. Safety endpoints included major adverse events up to 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were randomised; the baseline mean office BP following medication washout was 159.4/100.4±10.9/7.0 mmHg (RDN) and 160.1/98.3±11.0/6.1 mmHg (sham), respectively. At 8 weeks post-procedure, the mean (±standard deviation) 24-hour systolic BP change was â2.9±7.4 mmHg (p=0.009) versus â1.4±8.6 mmHg (p=0.25) in the RDN and sham groups, respectively (mean between-group difference: 1.5 mmHg; p=0.27). There were no differences in safety events between groups. After 12 months of blinded follow-up, with medication escalation, patients achieved similar office systolic BP (RDN: 147.9±18.5 mmHg; sham: 147.8±15.1 mmHg; p=0.68) with a significantly lower medication burden in the RDN group (mean daily defined dose: 1.5±1.5 vs 2.3±1.7; p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, alcohol-mediated RDN was delivered safely but was not associated with significant BP differences between groups. Medication burden was lower in the RDN group up to 12 months.

A novel index for measuring the impact of devices on hypertension

A key limitation in assessing the therapeutic impact of non-pharmacological approaches to treating hypertension is the method of reporting outcomes. Reducing the medications required to achieve the same blood pressure may be reported separately to a reduction in the blood pressure without change in medication, and thus lessen the reported beneficial impact of treatment. This study aims to derive a novel scoring system to gauge the therapeutic impact of non-drug treatment of hypertension by utilising a combination of excessive blood pressure and the number of anti-hypertensives into a combined score-the hypertensive index (HTi). The hypertensive index was empirically derived based on the systolic blood pressure and number of antihypertensive drugs, and applied retrospectively to a cohort undergoing intervention for renovascular hypertension. Subgroup and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to compare the HTi to traditional methods of reporting outcomes. Following intervention (99 patients), 46% had improvement in both medication load and blood pressure, 29% had benefit in blood pressure without reduction in medication load, 15% had reduction in medication load without significant change in blood pressure and 9% showed no benefit in either parameter. The HTi was superior in detecting benefit from intervention compared with measuring blood pressure or medication load alone (AUC 0.94 vs 0.85;0.84). The hypertensive index may be a more sensitive marker of treatment effect than assessing blood pressure measurements alone. The use of such scoring systems in future trial design may allow more accurate reporting of the effects of interventions for hypertension.

Efficacy of Antihypertensive Drugs of Different Classes After Renal Denervation in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) lowers blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Limited data exist on the effectiveness of different antihypertensive medications following RDN on BP and maladaptive cardiac phenotypes.

METHODS

Eighty-nine male spontaneously hypertensive rats with continuous BP recording underwent RDN or sham operation. Ten days postsurgery, spontaneously hypertensive rats were randomized to receive no antihypertensive medication, amlodipine, olmesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, bisoprolol, doxazosin, or moxonidine for 28 days. Cardiac remodeling was determined histologically, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was explored.

RESULTS

Before initiation of antihypertensive drugs, RDN reduced mean arterial pressure (-12.6 mm Hg [95% CI, -14.4 to -10.8]; P<0.001). At study end, mean arterial pressure was lower in RDN compared with sham operation in drug-naïve controls (P=0.006), olmesartan (P=0.002), amlodipine (P=0.0004), hydrochlorothiazide (P=0.006), doxazosin (P=0.001), and bisoprolol (P=0.039) but not in animals receiving moxonidine (P=0.122). Compared with pooled BP change of all other drug classes, mean arterial pressure change was largest for olmesartan (-15.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -18.6 to -13.2]; P<0.001) and amlodipine (-12.0 mm Hg [95% CI, -14.7 to -9.3]; P<0.001). In drug-naïve controls, RDN reduced plasma renin activity (-5.6%¸ P=0.03) and aldosterone concentration (-53.0%; P=0.005). In the presence of antihypertensive medication, plasma renin activity and aldosterone remained unchanged after RDN. Cardiac remodeling was not affected by RDN alone. In animals receiving olmesartan after RDN, cardiac perivascular fibrosis was attenuated. Amlodipine and bisoprolol following RDN reduced cardiomyocyte diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Following RDN, treatment with amlodipine and olmesartan resulted in the largest BP reduction. Antihypertensive medications mediated heterogeneous effects on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity and cardiac remodeling.

Hypotensive Effect of Electric Stimulation of Caudal Ventrolateral Medulla in Freely Moving Rats

Background and Objectives: An altered sympathetic function is established in primary arterial hypertension (PAH) development. Therefore, PAH could be targeted by applying an electric current to the medulla where reflex centers for blood pressure control reside. This study aims to evaluate the electric caudal ventrolateral medulla (CVLM) stimulation effect on blood pressure and animal survivability in a freely moving rat model. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 Wistar rats aged 12-16 weeks were randomly assigned to either: the experimental group (n = 10; electrode tip implanted in CVLM region) or the control group (n = 10; tip implanted 4 mm above the CVLM in the cerebellum). After a period of recovery (4 days), an experimental phase ensued, divided into an "OFF stimulation" period (5-7 days post-surgery) and an "ON stimulation" period (8-14 days post-surgery). Results: Three animals (15%, one in the control, two in the experimental group) dropped out due to postoperative complications. Arterial pressure in the experimental group rats during the "OFF stimulation" period decreased by 8.23 mm Hg (p = 0.001) and heart rate by 26.93 beats/min (p = 0.008). Conclusions: From a physiological perspective, CVLM could be an effective deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for drug-resistant hypertension: able to influence the baroreflex arc directly, having no known direct integrative or neuroendocrine function. Targeting the baroreflex regulatory center, but not its sensory or effector parts, could lead to a more predictable effect and stability of the control system. Although targeting neural centers in the medullary region is considered dangerous and prone to complications, it could open a new vista for deep brain stimulation therapy. A possible change in electrode design would be required to apply CVLM DBS in clinical trials in the future.

Advances in Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension

Hypertension significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular events and it is associated with high rates of disability and mortality. Hypertension is a common cause of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents, which severely affect patients’ quality of life and lifespan. Current treatment strategies for hypertension are based primarily on medication and lifestyle interventions. The renal sympathetic nervous system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension, and catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has provided a new concept for the treatment of hypertension. In recent years, studies on RDN have been performed worldwide. This article reviews the latest preclinical research and clinical evidence for RDN.

New perspectives for hypertension management: progress in methodological and technological developments

Hypertension is the most common and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 20% of deaths worldwide. However, 2/3 of people with hypertension are undiagnosed, untreated, or under treated. A multi-pronged approach is needed to improve hypertension management. Elevated blood pressure (BP) in childhood is a predictor of hypertension and CVD in adulthood; therefore, screening and education programmes should start early and continue throughout the lifespan. Home BP monitoring can be used to engage patients and improve BP control rates. Progress in imaging technology allows for the detection of preclinical disease, which may help identify patients who are at greatest risk of CV events. There is a need to optimize the use of current BP control strategies including lifestyle modifications, antihypertensive agents, and devices. Reducing the complexity of pharmacological therapy using single-pill combinations can improve patient adherence and BP control and may reduce physician inertia. Other strategies that can improve patient adherence include education and reassurance to address misconceptions, engaging patients in management decisions, and using digital tools. Strategies to improve physician therapeutic inertia, such as reminders, education, physician-peer visits, and task-sharing may improve BP control rates. Digital health technologies, such as telemonitoring, wearables, and other mobile health platforms, are becoming frequently adopted tools in hypertension management, particularly those that have undergone regulatory approval. Finally, to fight the consequences of hypertension on a global scale, healthcare system approaches to cardiovascular risk factor management are needed. Government policies should promote routine BP screening, salt-, sugar-, and alcohol reduction programmes, encourage physical activity, and target obesity control.

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).

Novel Invasive Methods as the Third Pillar for the Treatment of Essential Uncontrolled Hypertension

Pharmacologic therapies remain the treatment of choice for patients with essential hypertension, as endorsed by international guidelines. However, several cases warrant additional modalities, such as invasive antihypertensive therapeutics. The major target of these interventions is the modulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which is a common pathophysiologic mechanism in essential hypertension. In this narrative review, we elaborate on the role of invasive antihypertensive treatments with a focus on renal denervation, stressing their potential as well as the drawbacks that prevent their widespread implementation in everyday clinical practice. In the field of renal denervation, several trials have shown significant and sustained reductions in the level of office and ambulatory blood pressure, regardless of the type of energy that was used (radiofrequency or ultrasound). Critically, renal denervation is considered a safe intervention, as evidenced by follow-up data from large clinical trials. Baroreflex activation therapy may result in enhanced parasympathetic nervous system activation, thus lowering blood pressure levels. Along the same lines, carotid body ablation could also produce a significant antihypertensive effect, which has not been tested in appropriately designed randomized trials. Moreover, cardiac neuromodulation therapy could prove efficacious by altering the duration of the atrioventricular interval in order to regulate the preload of the left ventricle and, therefore, lower blood pressure.

Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal - knowns and known unknowns

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.

Device-Based Therapy for Resistant Hypertension: An Up-to-Date Review

Hypertension is the major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Matter of fact, untreated hypertension can worsen the overall health, whereas pharmacotherapy can play an important role in lowering the risk of high blood pressure in hypertensive patients. However, persistent uncontrolled hypertension remains an unsolved condition characterized by non-adherence to medication and increased sympathetic activity. This paper will review the non-pharmacological treatments for resistant hypertension (RH) that have emerged in recent years. In addition, the technologies developed in device-based RH therapy, as well as the clinical trials that support their use, will be discussed. Indeed, the novel device-based approaches that target RH present a promising therapy which has been supported by several studies and clinical trials, whereas drug non-adherence and high sympathetic activity are known to be the main causes of RH. Nevertheless, some additional aspects of these RH systems need to be tested in the near future, with a particular focus on the device’s design and availability of randomized controlled trials.

Exercise Training Attenuates Hypertension via Suppressing ROS/MAPK/NF-κB/AT-1R Pathway in the Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus

Background: Aerobic exercise training (ExT) is beneficial for hypertension, however, its central mechanisms in improving hypertension remain unclear. Since the importance of the up-regulation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT-1R) in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamic in sympathoexcitation and hypertension has been shown, we testified the hypothesis that aerobic ExT decreases blood pressure in hypertensive rats by down-regulating the AT-1R through reactive oxygen species (ROS)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/nuclear factors κB (NF-κB) pathway within the PVN. Methods: Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were assigned to the following groups: sham operation (SHAM) + kept sedentary (Sed), SHAM + exercise training (ExT), two kidney-one clamp (2K1C) + Sed, and 2K1C + ExT groups. Results: The 2K1C + Sed hypertensive rats showed higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), upregulated ROS, phosphorylated (p-) p44/42 MAPK, p-p38 MAPK, NF-κB p65 activity, and AT-1R expression in the PVN, and increased circulating norepinephrine (NE) than those of SHAM rats. After eight weeks of aerobic ExT, the 2K1C + ExT hypertensive rats showed attenuated NE and SBP levels, suppressed NF-κB p65 activity, and reduced expression of ROS, p-p44/42 MAPK, p-p38 MAPK, and AT-1R in the PVN, relatively to the 2K1C + Sed group. Conclusions: These data are suggestive of beneficial effects of aerobic ExT in decreasing SBP in hypertensive rats, via down-regulating the ROS/MAPK/NF-κB pathway that targets AT-1R in the PVN, and eventually ameliorating 2K1C-induced hypertension.

Renal Nerve Activity and Arterial Depressor Responses Induced by Neuromodulation of the Deep Peroneal Nerve in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Hypertension is a main cause of death in the United States with more than 103 million adults affected. While pharmacological treatments are effective, blood pressure (BP) remains uncontrolled in 50–60% of resistant hypertensive subjects. Using a custom-wired miniature electrode, we previously reported that deep peroneal nerve stimulation (DPNS) elicited acute cardiovascular depressor responses in anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Here, we further study this effect by implementing a wireless system and exploring different stimulation parameters to achieve a maximum depressor response. Our results indicate that DPNS consistently induces a reduction in BP and suggests that renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) is altered by this bioelectronic treatment. To test the acute effect of DPNS in awake animals, we developed a novel miniaturized wireless microchannel electrode (w-μCE), with a Z-shaped microchannel through which the target nerves slide and lock into the recording/stimulation chamber. Animals implanted with w-μCE and BP telemetry systems for 3 weeks showed an average BP of 150 ± 14 mmHg, which was reduced significantly by an active DPNS session to 135 ± 8 mmHg (p &lt; 0.04), but not in sham-treated animals. The depressor response in animals with an active w-μCE was progressively returned to baseline levels 14 min later (164 ± 26 mmHg). This depressor response was confirmed in restrained fully awake animals that received DPNS for 10 days, where tail-cuff BP measurements showed that systolic BP in SHR lowered 10% at 1 h and 16% 2 h after the DPNS when compared to the post-implantation baseline. Together, these results support the use of DPN neuromodulation as a possible strategy to lower BP in drug-resistant hypertension.

Arterial hypertension - clinical trials update 2022

Hypertension is the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor worldwide and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of multimodal therapeutic approaches, a large number of patients do not achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure targets, which reiterates the importance of continued research in the field. This article summarizes and discusses the most relevant clinical trials in hypertension research published in 2021 and 2022. The topics include new insights into treatment targets in the elderly, novel findings of salt consumption and lifestyle interventions in resistant hypertension, new evidence about early antihypertensive combination therapy and the use of angiotensin II receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors in resistant hypertension, as well as data regarding the safety of antihypertensive drugs with respect to cancerogeneity and regarding the impact of acetaminophen, a commonly used pain medication, on blood pressure. Finally, we provide an update on recent evidence on renal denervation and its role in current hypertension management.

[Arterial Hypertension]

Arterial hypertension affects about one third of the German population with a prevalence increasing with age up to 60 %. Globally, more than a quarter gedoppelt of the population are considered hypertensive, resulting in a total of more than one billion people. Not only due to such high prevalence, but also because of its multiple cardiovascular, renal, ocular, and cognitive complications, arterial hypertension is a leading contributor to the global burden of disease and responsible for up to 10 million deaths worldwide. Contrary to the great importance of arterial hypertension resulting from such high prevalence and immense impact on health worldwide, awareness of disease is low in affected people. Less than every second patient knows about his or her disease status and less than 40 % of patients in Europe show adequate blood pressure control with a treatment target of < 140/90 mmHg despite antihypertensive treatment. This overview of arterial hypertension, its etiology, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic options aims to improve the understanding of arterial hypertension and to facilitate the diagnostic and therapeutic approach, eventually resulting in a better and more successful handling of patients with arterial hypertension.

Treatment of Resistant Hypertension With Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification: 3-Year Results From the CALM-FIM Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term (3-year) safety and effectiveness of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EVBA) from both the European and American CALM-FIM cohorts.

BACKGROUND

The CALM-FIM study demonstrated that EVBA in patients with resistant hypertension significantly lowered blood pressure (BP) with an acceptable safety profile during 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

The CALM-FIM studies were prospective, nonrandomized, first-in-human studies that enrolled patients with resistant hypertension (office systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and mean 24-hour ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mm Hg despite a stable regimen of ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic agent). The incidence of (serious) adverse events and changes in BP, heart rate, and prescribed antihypertensive medication up to 3 years after implantation were determined.

RESULTS

The Mobius device was implanted in 47 patients (30 in Europe, 17 in the United States; mean age 54 years, 23 women). Five serious adverse events (hypotension, n = 2; hypertension, n = 1; vascular access complications, n = 2) and 2 transient ischemic attacks occurred within 30 days postprocedure. Two strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack occurred more than 2 years postimplantation. Mean office BP at baseline was 181 ± 17/107 ± 16 mm Hg and decreased by 25/12 mm Hg (95% CI: 17-33/8-17 mm Hg) at 6 months and 30/12 mm Hg (95% CI: 21-38/8-17 mm Hg) at 3 years. Mean 24-hour ambulatory BP at baseline was 166 ± 16/98 ± 15 mm Hg and decreased by 20/11 mm Hg (95% CI: 14-25/8-15 mm Hg) at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

EVBA with the MobiusHD was effective in reducing BP at 3-year follow-up and appears to have an acceptable safety profile in patients with uncomplicated implantation, although data from randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risk-benefit profile. (Controlling and Lowering Blood Pressure With the MobiusHD™ [CALM-FIM_EUR], NCT01911897; Controlling and Lowering Blood Pressure With the MobiusHD™ [CALM-FIM_US], NCT01831895).

Renal denervation as a management strategy for hypertension: current evidence and recommendations

INTRODUCTION

The concept of targeting the renal sympathetic nerves therapeutically to lower blood pressure (BP) is based on their crucial role in regulating both renal and cardiovascular control. These effects are mainly mediated via three major mechanisms including alteration of renal blood flow, renin-release, and Na⁺ retention. Initial surgical approaches applying crude and unselected sympathectomy, while rendering significant BP lowering and cardiovascular event reducing properties, where plagued by side effects. More modern selective catheter-based denervation approaches selectively targeting the renal nerves have been shown to be safe and effective in reducing BP in various forms of hypertension and multiple comorbidities.

AREAS COVERED

This article covers the background relevant for the concept of renal denervation (RDN), the evidence obtained from relevant randomized controlled trials to substantiate the safety and efficacy of RDN, and recently published clinical recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

Catheter-based RDN is safe and has now been shown in sham-controlled randomized clinical trials to result in clinically meaningful BP lowering in both drug naïve hypertensive patients and those on concomitant antihypertensive therapy. Real world data from a large global registry further supports the clinical utility of RDN. It now seems time to embed renal denervation into routine clinical care.