Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry

Left atrial appendage occlusion in atrial fibrillation: shaping the future of stroke prevention

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of thromboembolic events, particularly ischemic stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the predominant site of thrombus formation in patients with AF, making it a crucial target for stroke prevention strategies. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an important therapeutic alternative to oral anticoagulation, particularly in patients with contraindications to long-term anticoagulant therapy. This review examines the role of LAAO in AF management, discussing current indications, patient selection, procedural techniques, and clinical outcomes. We also explore the latest evidence from major clinical trials and real-world studies, highlighting the efficacy and safety of LAAO compared to standard anticoagulation. Additionally, we consider the unresolved questions and the potential future directions for this intervention, including emerging technologies and the integration of LAAO into broader AF management protocols. Our review underscores the growing importance of LAAO in reducing thromboembolic risk in AF patients, particularly those unable to tolerate traditional anticoagulation, and offers insights into the ongoing evolution of this treatment modality in clinical practice.

Emergent Cardiac Surgery After Transcatheter Structural Heart Procedures: Narrative Review

Transcatheter structural heart procedures have become standard therapy for elderly patients with high surgical risk. Over time, these procedures have significantly increased worldwide, accompanied by a concomitant reduction of major complications, including those requiring emergent cardiac surgery (ECS). This marked decline in ECS is due to technological advancements, improved patient selection and procedural techniques, and increased institutional and operators expertize. Moreover, most major structural complications after transcatheter structural heart procedures are now managed percutaneously, with only a small proportion requiring ECS. It is important to note that outcomes for patients requiring ECS remain unfavorable, even in the optimal setting. Currently, ECS after percutaneous structural interventions is very rare, less than 0.5%, as reported in multicenter available studies. However, fragmented data exist in the literature on the need of ECS. Indeed, low incidence, different definitions, and lack of recent reports make it difficult to have a precise and up-to-date overview of bailout surgery for treatment of procedural complications. This is the first comprehensive analysis focusing on ECS following the major frequent percutaneous structural procedures, that is, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, mitral valve repair/replacement, and left atrial appendage occlusion. More in general, a collaborative approach among Heart Team members, along with thorough procedural planning guided by advanced imaging techniques, is essential for ensuring high-quality interventions thus minimizing the risk of adverse events.

Feasibility of combined therapy: percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often present with concomitant significant mitral regurgitation (MR). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is indicated for patients with AF to prevent thromboembolism and reduce the need for long-term anticoagulation. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is recommended for patients with significant MR. However, the feasibility and efficacy of combining these therapeutic interventions remain uncertain. This study included consecutive patients who underwent LAAC. Feasibility was assessed by comparing outcomes between those undergoing combined LAAC + TEER and those receiving LAAC alone. Among 192 patients, 11 underwent the combined LAAC + TEER procedure, while 181 underwent LAAC alone. Procedural success was high in both groups (100% vs. 99%). At the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of significant device leak and device-related thrombus did not differ significantly between the groups (0% vs. 1.1% and 0% vs. 6.7%, respectively; p > 0.05 for both). Additionally, the cumulative incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events was comparable between the two groups (thromboembolic p = 0.57 and bleeding p = 0.42). The combination of LAAC + TEER may be a feasible and effective therapeutic strategy when performed in carefully selected patients at high-volume, experienced centers.

Clinical management after surgical left atrial appendage exclusion

BACKGROUND

Surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an increasingly utilized approach to mitigate the risk of cardioembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Consensus is lacking regarding optimal stroke prevention management after surgical LAA management.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate real world clinical management of anticoagulation in patients undergoing surgical LAA management.

METHODS

Over a 7-year period at a single center, 458 participants carried a diagnosis of AF and underwent surgical exclusion of their LAA during concomitant cardiac surgery. Follow-up was catalogued via retrospective chart review; median follow-up was 2 years. Successful LAA ligation was defined as maximal stump depth < 1.0 cm by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) without distal leak.

RESULTS

Among 458 patients, 299 were discharged on OAC (142 DOAC and 157 warfarin). Of these, 31% (94/299) had a follow-up TEE. Among those without a TEE, 32% (65/205) were taken off OAC; among those who underwent TEE, 59% (55/94) were taken off OAC. Using a logistic regression model, there was no relationship between age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, or creatinine and the probability of coming off of OAC. Among the 94 patients discharged on OAC who had a follow-up TEE:10 were unable to assess adequacy of closure, 69 were successful, and 15 showed unsuccessful closure. In the group with imaging confirmed successful exclusion of their LAA, 67% (46/69) were taken off their oral anticoagulation, with cessation occurring after the TEE in 93% (43/46) of those patients.

CONCLUSION

Clinical management after surgical LAA management, particularly with regard to LAA imaging and OAC continuation, is highly heterogeneous.

Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is indicated in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom long-term oral anticoagulation is contraindicated. Whether outcomes are different based on operator certification (interventional cardiology [IC] vs electrophysiology [EP]) is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to compare LAAO outcomes by physician certification (EP vs IC) in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) LAAO Registry.

METHODS

We identified patients from 2020 to 2022 undergoing implantation of a Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific) or Amulet (Abbott Cardiovascular) LAAO device and stratified patients by primary operator certification. Outcomes of interest included: 1) any major adverse event (MAE); 2) mortality; 3) ischemic stroke; and 4) major bleeding during the initial hospitalization and at 45 days. We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to determine the risk of adverse events by physician certification.

RESULTS

A total of 1,638 physicians (57% electrophysiologists) performing 91,711 procedures during the study period were included. EPs were more likely to use intracardiac echocardiography (25.2% vs 9.7%; P < 0.001) and had lower radiation total (235 mGy vs 305 mGy; P < 0.001). EPs were more likely than ICs to discharge patients on DOAC + aspirin, whereas ICs were more likely to discharge patients on single or dual antiplatelet therapy (all P < 0.001). In-hospital death (0.1% vs 0.1%; P = 0.46) and MAE (1.5% vs 1.6%; P = 0.42) were similar by physician certification. At 45 days, there was no difference in death (HRdeath: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.20) or MAE (HRMAE: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91-1.03) after multivariable regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary LAAO is safe with low rates of procedural complications and no significant differences in procedural outcomes by operator subspecialty after multivariable adjustment. Continued utilization of technology by EPs and ICs is necessary to allow for broad access to this treatment for eligible patients.

Efficacy of surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia that greatly elevates the risk of stroke. This risk increases both during and after cardiac procedures, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is an increasing interest in non-pharmacological treatments such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and surgical ablation, intending to enhance both immediate and long-term postoperative results.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of surgical ablation (SA), LAAO, or both in patients with AF undergoing CABG.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and WOS. We analyzed data using R language and "netmeta" and "netrank" packages of meta-insight software. Pooled outcomes were reported as mean difference or risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) in a random effect method.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included with 594,312 patients included. The 30-day mortality showed a non-statistically significant difference between CABG-LAAO compared to CABG alone and CABG-SA with RR of 1.70 (95%CI 0.38-7.61) and 0.62 (95%CI 0.10-3.94). However, compared to CABG alone, CABG-SA + LAAO, CABG-LAAO, and CABG-SA had significantly lower risk of long-term mortality with RR 0.75 (95%CI 0.57-0.98), 0.78 (95%CI 0.65-0.94), and 0.73 (95%CI 0.61-0.88), respectively. CABG-SA + LAAO, CABG-LAAO, and CABG-SA reduced the risk of short-term stroke compared to CABG alone with RR of 0.73 (95%CI 0.43-1.24), 0.93 (95%CI 0.78-1.11), and 1.01 (95%CI 0.75-1.36), respectively. Moreover, only CABG-SA + LAAO and CABG-LAAO showed a statistically significant reduction in long term stroke and hospitalization due to heart failure while CABG-SA showed no statistically significant difference. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between our interventions in terms of 30-day rehospitalization, intra-aortic balloon pump support, and risk of hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with AF undergoing CABG, whether undergoing SA alone or LAAO alone or both showed significant clinical outcomes such as reduced risk of both short- and long-term mortality and short-term stroke.

Pericardial Tamponade After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Placement: A Case for Emergent Point-of-Care Ultrasound

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is rising, with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices emerging as viable alternatives to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in high-risk patients. Although LAAO devices reduce bleeding risks compared to traditional anticoagulants, they carry procedural risks, including pericardial effusion and tamponade. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with a history of AF who presented to the emergency department with shortness of breath, dizziness, and weight gain five days post-LAAO placement. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed a large pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. Emergency pericardiocentesis drained 800 mL of fluid, resulting in rapid clinical improvement. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and he was discharged two days later. Pericardial effusion and tamponade are serious complications of LAAO devices, often presenting with nonspecific symptoms. Emergency physicians should be familiar with the procedure itself, its complications, and the utility of POCUS in expediting care as seen in this case.

State of the Art in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become an important therapeutic target for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Over the past 2 decades, several advancements in LAAO devices (percutaneous and surgical) have been made for stroke prevention and arrhythmia therapy. However, there are several unanswered questions regarding optimal patient selection, the preferred LAAO approach and device, the management of periprocedural and postprocedural complications, including pericardial effusion, device-related thrombus, and device leaks. This review focuses on fundamental foundational concepts in various aspects of the left atrial appendage and management strategies as they relate to current clinical needs.

Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure

(1) Background: Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging has reported new cerebral ischemic lesions after left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in about one- third of patients. Stroke occurs predominantly periprocedurally. This study evaluated the characteristics of embolized debris captured by the SENTINELTM cerebral embolic protection system in patients undergoing LAA closure; (2) Methods: Sixty filters of 30 consecutive patients undergoing LAA closure with the WATCHMAN FLXTM device were collected and captured debris was analyzed by histopathology and histomorphometry. Clinical outcome measures were disabling and non-disabling stroke within 72 h; (3) Results: In most filters, no material was captured. The predominant captured debris was acute or organized thrombi. The most common pattern was acute fibrin-rich thrombus, which was detected in 11/30 (33.3%) patients. Particles of heart tissue were seen in 6/30 (20%) patients, and foreign material was seen in one (3.3%) patient. The number of particles ranged from 0 to 52 per patient with a maximum of 31 in the distal and 21 in the proximal filter. Particle diameter ranged from 131 to 2614 µm. By logistic regression analysis, only protected time remained a multivariable predictor for larger particles (p = 0.039). There was no disabling or non-disabling stroke. Compared to transfemoral aortic valve replacement, the number of particles is only about 1.5%. (4) Conclusion: LAA occlusion with the WATCHMAN FLXTM was associated with a very low number of embolized particles captured with the double-filter SENTINELTM embolic protection system and no periprocedural stroke.

Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and intracerebral haemorrhage associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre observational study and pooled analysis of published studies

BACKGROUND

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a common cause of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) with a high recurrence risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a method for ischaemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), potentially reducing the risk of intracranial bleeding in CAA-associated ICH. We aimed to determine the outcomes of patients with AF with CAA-associated ICH undergoing LAAO.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre study of patients with CAA-associated ICH who underwent LAAO for stroke prevention. We pooled our findings with data from a systematic review of relevant published studies of LAAO for AF in ICH survivors reporting CAA diagnosis.

RESULTS

We included data from two published studies (n=65) with CAA-specific data and our cohort study (n=37), providing a total of 102 participants (mean age 76.2±8.0 years, 74.6% male) with CAA-related symptomatic ICH and AF treated with LAAO. The median follow-up period was 9.4 months (IQR 4.2-20.6). Postprocedural antithrombotic regimens varied between single (73.0%) or dual antiplatelet therapy (16.2%), or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) (10.8%), with a median duration of 42 days (IQR 35-74). Postprocedural complications were uncommon, but included transient arrhythmias (2.1%) and non-life-threatening tamponade (2.1%). Pooled incidence rates of ischaemic stroke and ICH during follow-up were 5.16 (95% CI 1.36 to 17.48) and 2.73 (95% CI 0.41 to 13.94) per 100 patient years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LAAO followed by short-term antithrombotic therapy might be a safe and effective ischaemic stroke preventive strategy in people with CAA-associated ICH and AF. However, randomised controlled trials are needed to determine how LAAO compares with long-term DOAC in this population.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023415354.

Interventional closure of an iatrogenic LAA-perforation by means of a PFO-occluder

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disorder with a high risk for cardioembolic strokes. Interventional occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is an alternative to the widely established stroke prevention with oral anticoagulation. Complications through LAA closure (LAAC) are rare and usually occur periinterventional. We present a case of an 87-year-old patient who presents for elective LAAC. After placement of the LAA occluder (Amplatzer Amulet device 25 mm) in the LAA and partial resheathing, the patient developed a pericardial effusion (PE), became hemodynamically unstable and went into cardiac arrest with the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). After drainage of the PE, we closed the causative LAA-perforation using a persistent foramen ovale (PFO)-occluder device (Amplatzer Talisman, 25 mm). Thereby we were able to successfully seal the perforation and stabilize the patient. The patient was monitored at our intensive care unit for 2 days and left the hospital in good condition a few days after. Procedural complications during interventional LAAC are rare but can be serious. The most common complication, PE, requires percutaneous drainage and often cardiac surgery. We present a case in which a perforation and following PE with hemodynamic relevance and need for CPR was resolved with an interventional strategy through implantation of a PFO-occluder into the perforation. With this approach we were able to show that in the right setting even serious complications can be treated by interventional measures, thereby not only saving the patient's life, but also avoiding cardiac surgery.

Predictors of Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: TED-F2 Score

Background

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) is performed to prevent LAA thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The risk of device-related thrombus (DRT) on the atrial side of the LAAO device is approximately 4%. Identifying patients at high risk of DRT would enable closer surveillance and more-aggressive anticoagulation to prevent post-LAAO DRT-related stroke.

Methods

From the LAAO registry at The University of Kansas Medical Center, we identified patients who developed DRT. We chose 3 unmatched controls per DRT case from LAAO recipients without DRT. Predictor variables were obtained from transesophageal echocardiogram reports and/or images, transthoracic echocardiogram reports, and chart review. Implant depth was measured from the limbus of the left atrial ridge to the centre of the atrial aspect of the LAAO device, on a 45° transesophageal echocardiogram view.

Results

We identified 26 patients with DRT (aged 77.7 ± 9.7 years; 34.6% female) and selected 78 unmatched controls without DRT. Univariate predictors of DRT, comprising a novel TED-F2 score, included history of venous Thromboembolism (23.1% vs 5.1%, P = 0.01), an LAA Emptying velocity ≤ 20 cm/s (45.8% vs 18.9%, P = 0.01), an implant Depth > 2 cm (34.6% vs 12.8%, P = 0.02), and presence of AF rhythm at time of device implantation (50.0 % vs 11.5%, P = 0.0001). A TED-F2 score of ≥ 3 was very strongly associated with DRT-odds ratio 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 3.8-41.1, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

We propose a novel risk score to predict development of DRT after LAAO, comprising history of venous Thromboembolism, LAA Emptying velocity ≤ 20 cm/s, implant Depth > 2 cm (1 point each), and an AF rhythm at implantation (2 points). A TED-F2 risk score of ≥ 3 identified patients who are at greatly elevated risk of developing DRT.

Fatigue strength analysis of a new left atrial appendage occluder at different release scales

Owing to its low incidence, small trauma, fast recovery, and high efficiency, left atrial appendage occlusion has become a new strategy for preventing stroke caused by atrial fibrillation. Due to a lack of relevant research information on this emerging technology, the effectiveness, stability, or related complications of occluders are mostly observed from a clinical perspective. However, there are fewer studies on the mechanical properties and safety of these occluders. In this study, a new left atrial appendage occluder is proposed, and a complete numerical simulation analysis framework is established through the finite element method to simulate the actual implantation and service process of the left atrial appendage occluder. Besides, the influence of the structural size and release scale of the occluder on its support performance, occluding effect, and safety is also explored. The results demonstrate that the structural size and release scale exert a significant impact on the support performance, occluding effect, and safety of the occluder. The structural optimization of the occluder contributes to enhancing its mechanical performance, thus ensuring its stability and effectiveness after implantation. Overall, these efforts may lay a scientific foundation for the structural optimization, safety evaluation, and effectiveness prediction of the occluder. Furthermore, these findings also provide effective reference for the application of numerical simulation technology in the research on the left atrial appendage occlusion.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with prior left atrial appendage occlusion device

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of CA for AF and left-sided atrial arrhythmias (AA) in patients with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices are lacking.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective registry that included all patients with prior LAAO who underwent catheter ablation for AF or left-sided atrial arrhythmia from January 2020-January 2023. The primary outcomes were procedure-related complications, device-related complications, AA recurrence, and stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with prior LAAO were included in the analysis (mean age 75.1 ± 7.1 years old, 50% male, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4 ± 1.6, 46.7% paroxysmal AF, 73.3% had prior AF ablation, mean time to ablation 475 ± 365 days). 93.3% (n = 28) and 6.6% (n = 2) patients had ablation for AF (46.7% paroxysmal, 36.7% persistent, 10% long-standing persistent) and left-sided atrial tachycardia, respectively. 16.7% (n = 5) patients underwent ablation along the left atrial appendage ostium, and 3.3% (n = 1) underwent Vein of Marshall alcohol ablation. There were 3 (10%) peri-procedural complications (1 access hematoma and two pericardial effusions requiring intervention-none related to left atrial appendage ostium or alcohol ablation). During the mean follow-up of 440 ± 379 days, 40% (n = 12) patients had AA recurrence (91.6% AF, 8.3% atrial tachycardia), of which five patients needed repeat ablation, and two patients were readmitted for heart failure. There was no stroke or any device-related complications, including new peri-device leaks or device-related thrombosis in patients who had follow-up imaging studies (n = 11, 36.7%).

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation for AF (including VoM alcohol ablation) in patients with prior LAAO devices is feasible and safe with favorable outcomes.

Trends in safety of catheter-based electrophysiology procedures in the last 2 decades: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rapid technologic development and expansion of procedural expertise have led to widespread proliferation of catheter-based electrophysiology procedures. It is unclear whether these advances come at cost to patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to assess complication rates after modern electrophysiology procedures during the lifetime of the procedures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed to identify relevant data published before May 30, 2023. Studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: prospective trials or registries, including comprehensive complications data; and patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, ventricular tachyarrhythmia ablation, leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation, and percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion. Pooled incidences of procedure-related complications were individually assessed by random effects models to account for heterogeneity. Temporal trends in complications were investigated by clustering trials by publication year (2000-2018 vs 2019-2023).

RESULTS

A total of 174 studies (43,914 patients) met criteria for analysis: 126 studies of atrial fibrillation ablation (n = 24,057), 25 studies of ventricular tachyarrhythmia ablation (n = 1781), 21 studies of leadless cardiac pacemaker (n = 8896), and 18 studies of left atrial appendage occlusion (n = 9180). The pooled incidences of serious procedure-related complications (3.49% [2000-2018] vs 3.05% [2019-2023]; P < .001), procedure-related stroke (0.46% vs 0.28%; P = .002), pericardial effusion requiring intervention (1.02% vs 0.83%; P = .037), and procedure-related death (0.15% vs 0.06%; P = .003) significantly decreased over time. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of vascular complications over time (1.86% vs 1.88%; P = .888).

CONCLUSION

Despite an increase in cardiac electrophysiology procedures, procedural safety has improved over time.

Outcomes With the WATCHMAN FLX in Everyday Clinical Practice From the NCDR Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry

BACKGROUND

PINNACLE FLX (Protection Against Embolism for Nonvalvular AF Patients: Investigational Device Evaluation of the WATCHMAN FLX LAA Closure Technology) demonstrated improved outcomes and low incidence of adverse events with the WATCHMAN FLX device in a controlled setting. The National Cardiovascular Disease Registry's Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry was utilized to assess the safety and effectiveness of WATCHMAN FLX in contemporary clinical practice in the United States.

METHODS

The WATCHMAN FLX Device Surveillance Post Approval Analysis Plan used data from the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry to identify patients undergoing WATCHMAN FLX implantation between August 2020 and September 2022. The key safety end point was defined as all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device or procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention between device implantation and hospital discharge. Major adverse events were reported at hospital discharge, 45 days, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 97 185 patients in the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry undergoing WATCHMAN FLX, successful implantation occurred in 97.5% (n=94 784) of patients. The key safety end point occurred in 0.45% of patients. At 45 days post-procedure, all-cause death occurred in 0.81% patients, ischemic stroke in 0.23%, major bleeding in 3.1%, pericardial effusion requiring intervention in 0.50%, device-related thrombus in 0.44%, and device embolism in 0.04% patients. No peri-device leak was observed in 83.1% of patients at 45 days. At 1 year, the rate of all-cause death was 8.2%, the rate of any stroke was 1.5% (ischemic stroke, 1.2%), and major bleeding occurred in 6.4% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary cohort of patients with the WATCHMAN FLX device, the rates of implant success and clinical outcomes through 1 year were comparable with the PINNACLE FLX study, demonstrating that favorable outcomes achieved in the pivotal approval study can be replicated in routine clinical practice.

Impact of gender in patients with device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure - A sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT-registry

BACKGROUND

Device-related thrombosis (DRT) is a common finding after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and is associated with worse outcomes. As women are underrepresented in clinical studies, further understanding of sex differences in DRT patients is warranted.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This sub-analysis from the EUROC-DRT-registry compromises 176 patients with diagnosis of DRT after LAAC. Women, who accounted for 34.7% (61/176) of patients, were older (78.0 ± 6.7 vs. 74.9 ± 9.1 years, p = .06) with lower rates of comorbidities. While DRT was detected significantly later in women (173 ± 267 vs. 127 ± 192 days, p = .01), anticoagulation therapy was escalated similarly, mainly with initiation of novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or heparin. DRT resolution was achieved in 67.5% (27/40) of women and in 75.0% (54/72) of men (p = .40). In the remaining cases, an intensification/switch of anticoagulation was conducted in 50.% (9/18) of men and in 41.7% (5/12) of women. Final resolution was achieved in 72.5% (29/40) cases in women, and in 81.9% (59/72) cases in men (p = .24). Women were followed-up for a similar time as men (779 ± 520 vs. 908 ± 687 days, p = .51). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in mortality rates in women (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.73, 95%-Confidence interval [95%-CI]: .68-4.37, p = .25) and no differences in stroke (HR: .83, 95%-CI: .30-2.32, p = .72) within 2 years after LAAC.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of risk factors and outcome revealed no differences between men and women, with DRT in women being diagnosed significantly later. Women should be monitored closely to assess for DRT formation/resolution. Treatment strategies appear to be equally effective.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion as a Strategy for Reducing Stroke Risk in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common rhythm disorder of middle-aged to older adults that can cause ischemic strokes and systemic embolism. Stroke prevention is a crucial aspect of management, considering the increasing AF population and the associated morbidity and mortality. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has been identified as a predominant source of AF-associated thrombus and stroke, with at least 90% of the thrombi originating from this anatomical structure. Lifelong use of oral anticoagulants reduces the risk of these ischemic events but increases the risk of major and clinically relevant hemorrhages. In addition, these medications also require strict compliance for efficacy and have high failure rates in higher-risk patients. LAA occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative strategy for stroke prevention with encompassing various percutaneous and surgical techniques. Randomized controlled trials evaluating this intervention have shown promising results in stroke reduction replacing anticoagulation therapy. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview on the anatomy of the LAA and its role in thrombus formation, the emergence of various LAAO techniques and devices, and provide evidence on the role of LAAO in the reduction of stroke risk among patients with nonvalvular AF.

Use of SAFARI 2™ as workhorse wire for left-sided structural heart interventions

BACKGROUND

With the advances in percutaneous treatment technologies, the left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and the transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip (TMVR) are increasingly being performed today. The SAFARI 2™ guidewire is primarily used during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), our group has also been using it during MitraClip and LAAO procedures. Our clinical study aimed to share our data on the safety and effectiveness for the use of the SAFARI 2™ guidewire during MitraClip or LAAO procedures.

METHODS

This study included a total of 1730 patients (948 patients of MitraClip and 782 of LAAO). It was designed as single arm, retrospective, and multicenter between July 2016 and August 2022. SAFARI 2™ guidewire was used exclusively during all the procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 1730 patients (male 55.8 %) were included in the study. There was no guidewire-related complications, stroke/transient ischemic attack, bleeding (minor/major/life-threatening), need for cardiac surgery, pneumonia, and vascular dissection/rupture in patients undergoing LAAO. There were 2 device-related pericardial effusions without tamponade. No stroke/transient ischemic attack, bleeding (minor/major/life-threatening), mortality, need for cardiac surgery, pneumonia, guidewire-related complication, pericardial effusion, vascular dissection/rupture, or clip embolization was observed in patients undergoing MitraClip.

CONCLUSIONS

By taking advantage of its pre-shaped structure, the SAFARI 2™ guidewire seems to offer a reliable and safe device delivery for both MitraClip and LAAO procedures as a regular work horse wire. Our results should be confirmed by larger randomized or prospective trials.

Challenges and advances in device-related thrombus in left atrial appendage occlusion

Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is a mainstay for mitigating stroke and other embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the demonstrated efficacy of OAC in reducing events, many patients are unable to tolerate OAC due to bleeding risks. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices were developed as implantable technologies to moderate stroke risk in patients with intolerance to OAC. Despite clinical data supporting near-comparable protection against thromboembolic events with OAC, device-related thrombus formation has emerged as a critical complication following LAAO that remains a potential limitation to the safety and efficacy of LAAO. Improved biocompatibility of LAAO devices with fluoropolymers, a well-established stent-coating technology used to reduce thrombus formation and promote endothelialization, may optimize outcomes after LAAO.

Comparative Data of Procedural and Midterm Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Between the WATCHMAN FLX and WATCHMAN 2.5 Devices - Insight From the OCEAN-LAAC Registry

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding clinical outcomes after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX (WM-FLX) and WATCHMAN-2.5 (WM2.5) devices in Asian patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data of 1,464 consecutive patients (WM-FLX, n=909; WM2.5, n=555) were extracted from a Japanese multicenter registry, and clinical data were compared between the 2 groups. No in-hospital deaths, periprocedural stroke, or device embolization occurred. Procedural success was significantly higher in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group (95.8% vs. 91.9%; P=0.002) owing to the lower incidence of periprocedural pericardial effusion (0.55% vs. 1.8%; P=0.021). No significant differences in all-cause death, postprocedural stroke, and device-related thrombus were observed between the 2 groups. However, the cumulative bleeding rate at 1 year was substantially lower in the WM-FLX group (7.8% vs. 16.4%; P<0.001). Landmark analysis of bleeding events highlighted lower bleeding rates in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group within the first 6 months (6.4% vs. 14.8%; P<0.001), with comparable bleeding rates over the 6- to 12-month period (1.5% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P=0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated higher early safety and lower 1-year bleeding rates in the WM-FLX than WM2.5 group. The lower bleeding events with WM-FLX are likely due to multiple factors other than purely difference in devices, such as postprocedural drug regimen.

Contrast-free left atrial appendage occlusion in patients using the LAMBRE™ device

BACKGROUND

Advances in imaging have led to procedural optimization of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Contrast-free approaches, guided merely by echocardiography, have been established, however data on this topic remains scarce. In this analysis, we assessed contrast-free procedural results with the LAMBRE LAAC device.

METHODS

The multicenter retrospective BoBoMa (Bonn/Bordeaux/Mainz)-Registry included a total of 118 patients that underwent LAAC with LAMBRE devices omitting contrast-dye. Baseline and echocardiographic characteristics as well as intra- and postprocedural complications and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were at a mean age of 77.5 ± 7.5 years with high thromboembolic and bleeding risk (CHADS-VASc-score 4.6 ± 1.4, HAS-BLED-score 3.7 ± 1.0, respectively). Renal function was impaired with a mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 50 ± 22 ml/min. Mean procedural time was 47.2 ± 37.5  minutes with a mean radiation dose of 4.75 ± 5.25 Gy*cm2. Device success, defined as proper deployment in a correct position, was achieved in 97.5% (115/118) of cases with repositioning of the occluder in 7.6% (9/118) and resizing in 3.4% (4/118) of cases. No relevant peri-device leakage (>3 mm) was observed with 42% of occluders being implanted in an ostial position. Periprocedural complications occurred in 6.8% (8/118) of cases, including two cases of device embolization and one case of clinically-relevant pericardial effusion requiring surgical intervention. Other complications included pericardial effusion (2.5%, 3/118) and vascular access site complications (1.7%, 2/118).

CONCLUSION

Echocardiography-guided contrast-free LAAC using the LAMBRE device is safe and feasible. Further prospective studies including the direct comparison of devices as well as imaging techniques are warranted in contrast-free LAAC.

Pericardial Effusion After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Timing, Predictors, and Clinical Impact

BACKGROUND

Pericardial effusion (PE) is the most common serious left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) complication, but its mechanisms, time course, and prognostic impact are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the frequency, timing, predictors and clinical impact of PE after LAAC.

METHODS

Data on consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous LAAC between 2009 and 2022 were prospectively collected including the 1-year follow-up. Both single (Watchman 2.5/FLX, Boston Scientific) and double (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Amulet, St. Jude Medical/Abbott) LAAC devices were used. An imaging core laboratory adjudicated the PEs and categorized them as early (≤7 days) and late (8-365 days). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of early and overall PE.

RESULTS

Of 1,023 attempted LAAC procedures, PE was observed in 44 (4.3%) patients; PE was categorized as early in 34 (3.3%) and late in 10 (0.9%) patients. The majority of PEs occurred within 6 hours after LAAC (n = 25, 56.8%) and were clinically relevant (n = 28, 63.6%). Independent predictors of early PE were double-closure left atrial appendage devices (adjusted OR: 8.20; 95% CI: 1.09-61.69), female sex (adjusted OR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.50-7.73), the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) at baseline (adjusted OR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.11-6.09), and advanced age (adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.23), whereas female sex and OAC at baseline remained independent predictors of overall PE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large LAAC registry, PE was observed in <1 in 20 patients and usually occurred within 6 hours after procedure. The majority of early PEs were clinically relevant and occurred in the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet procedures. Independent predictors included the use of double-closure devices, female sex, OAC at baseline, and advanced age. (LAAC-registry: Clinical Outcome After Echocardiography-guided LAA-closure; NCT04628078).

Incidence of Acute Thrombosis After Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of acute phase thrombosis after surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure remain unclear. This study sought to determine the frequency, prognosis, and factors involved in thrombogenesis after surgical LAA occlusion.

METHODS

In this study, data from patients who underwent 2 types of standalone surgical LAA closure (either resection or clipping) between July 2014 and March 2020 at a single center were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 239 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation underwent minimally invasive standalone surgical LAA occlusion (184 resection cases and 55 clipping cases). On postoperative day 2, electrocardiogram synchronized contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed in 223 cases (93.3%), and echocardiography follow-up was performed in 16 cases when CT was contraindicated. Acute postoperative thrombus on the closed stump was detected in 35 cases (14.7%), of which 29 cases (15.8%) belonged to the resection group and 6 cases (10.9%) belonged to the clipping group. No significant difference was detected between the groups, and no significant predictors of acute-phase thrombosis were found. Thromboembolism occurred in 4 patients before postoperative imaging follow-up, and there was no evidence of thrombi in these patients on postoperative day 2 CT. Three months after the first CT, thrombi were no longer detected in 34 of 35 patients (97.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombosis can occur after surgical LAA occlusion. Although the clinical significance is yet unclear, it may be reasonable to continue anticoagulation therapy until a lack of thrombosis is confirmed, unless there are contraindications.

Comparative Assessment of Percutaneous Left-Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) Devices-A Single Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left-atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established method for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation, offering an alternative to oral anticoagulation. Various occluder devices have been developed to cater to individual anatomical needs and ensure a safe and effective procedure. In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, we compare different LAAO devices with respect to clinical outcomes, LAA sealing properties, and device-related complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 270 patients who underwent percutaneous LAA closure in our center between 2009 and 2023. Patient data were extracted from medical records, including gender, age at implantation, indication, device type and size, laboratory values, LAA anatomy, periprocedural complications, ECG parameters, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography parameters (TTE and TEE), as well as medication at discharge. Moreover, fluoroscopy time and implantation duration, as well as post-implantation clinical events up to 1 year, were collected. Endpoints were bleeding events, recurrent stroke, thrombi on devices, and death.

RESULTS

The implanted devices were the Watchman 2.5, Watchman FLX, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP), and Amulet. The procedural success rate was 95.7% (n = 265), with cactus anatomy posing the most challenges across all devices. The mean patient age was 75.5 ± 7.7 years, with 64.5% being male. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.8 ± 1.5 and the median HAS-BLED score was 3.8 ± 1.0. Indications for LAA closure included past bleeding events and elevated bleeding risk. Periprocedural complications were most commonly bleeding at the puncture site, particularly after ACP implantation (p = 0.014). Significant peridevice leaks (PDL) were observed in 21.4% of simple sealing mechanism devices versus 0% in double sealing mechanism devices (p = 0.004). Thrombi were detected on devices in six patients, with no subsequent ischemic stroke or thromboembolic event. Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in the occurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thromboembolic events, device-related thrombi, or mortality among different device types. A 62.3% relative risk reduction in thromboembolic events and 38.6% in major bleedings could be observed over 568.2 patient years.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our study highlights the efficacy and safety of LAA closure using various occluder devices despite anatomical challenges. Our long-term follow-up findings support LAA closure as a promising option for stroke prevention in selected patient cohorts. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize outcomes in LAA closure procedures.

"The Failing Watchman": Recurrent Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device (LAAOD) Thrombus After Successful Initial Implantation

A 79-year-old female with chronic atrial fibrillation was being treated with dabigatran (Pradaxa). Pradaxa was discontinued after a significant bleeding episode. A WATCHMAN device was successfully implanted and Pradaxa was started. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) 49 days later showed a 3.6×2.2 cm clot overlying the device. Pradaxa was switched to Coumadin. Subsequent TEEs showed the complete resolution of the thrombus after five months on Coumadin. Coumadin was discontinued. Six months later, TEE showed a large mobile thrombus attached to the left atrial appendage occlusion device (LAAOD). The patient's hypercoagulable workup was negative. Due to recurrent thrombotic events, she was started on apixaban (Eliquis) due to a prior history of bleeding on Coumadin. She is currently on Eliquis with no further episodes of bleeding or device thrombus.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous Watchman 2.5 device versus Amplatzer Amulet for left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and study-level meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), mechanical occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using a permanently implanted device may be an effective alternative to oral anti-coagulants (OAC). To facilitate left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), multiple percutaneous devices have been proposed. Watchman Generation 2.5 and Amplatzer Amulet are the two most popular used devices for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF. We sought to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between Watchman 2.5 and Amplatzer Amulet in patients undergoing LAAC procedure.

METHODS

We carried out a comprehensive and systematic search of the databases PubMed and Scopus, for all studies that compared the safety and efficacy of Watchman 2.5 and Amplatzer Amulet devices, from inception, till June 2023. We performed the statistical analysis using Review Manager (V.5.4.1 Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). The safety outcomes of interest included device success, device-related thrombus, device embolization perioperatively and at follow-up, perioperative pericardial perfusion events, and perioperative cardiac tamponade events. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality perioperatively and at follow-up, cardiovascular (CV) mortality at follow-up, stroke, major and minor bleeding events at follow-up, transient ischemic attack (TIA) in follow-up period, thromboembolic events in follow-up period, and peri-device leakage in perioperative period. All data was analysed using a random-effects model, and presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

Regarding safety outcomes, device success was non-significantly reduced in Watchman group when compared with Amulet (RR 0.99, p = 0.57; I2 = 34%). In contrast, device-related thrombus was non-significantly increased in Watchman 2.5 group in comparison to Amulet (RR 1.44, p = 0.11; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference between the devices in terms of device embolization in the perioperative (RR 0.36, p = 0.38; I2 = 22%) and follow-up (RR 2.24, p = 0.13; I2 = 0%) periods. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the risks of pericardial effusion (RR 0.98, p = 0.98; I2 = 0%), and cardiac tamponade (RR 0.65, p = 0.76; I2 = 62%) perioperatively. Regarding efficacy outcomes, no significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between devices perioperatively (RR 0.51, p = 0.32; I2 = 0%) and at follow-up (RR 1.08, p = 0.56; I2 = 0%). CV-mortality was non-significantly reduced in Watchman group when compared with Amulet (RR 0.57, p = 0.20; I2 = 0%). The Amulet device was not superior to the Watchman device in terms of stroke at follow-up (RR 1.13, p = 0.63; I2 = 0%). Sub-group analysis showed comparable ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke events between two devices. Furthermore, at follow-up, there was no significant difference in major (RR 1.06, p = 0.63; I2 = 0%) and minor bleeding events (RR 1.81, p = 0.17; I2 = 0%) between the two devices. No difference was observed for trans-ischemic attack (RR 1.89, p = 0.24; I2 = 0%) and thromboembolic events (RR 0.96, p = 0.96; I2 = 0%) at follow-up. No significant difference was observed between devices for peri-device leakage in perioperative period (RR 2.16, p = 0.05; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

The data suggested that LAAC is safe and efficacious procedure irrespective of device used, with generally low complication rates. Watchman generation 2.5 remains non-superior to Amplatzer Amulet in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes.

The use of percutaneous left atrial appendage occluder device in a patient with prior surgical ligation with incomplete exclusion: a case report

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation in patients with AF. Therapies include use of percutaneous LAA closure devices, or surgical LAA occlusion (LAAO). Despite these options, complete closure of the LAA is not always achieved, and residual communication between the LAA and atrium may result in increased thrombus formation. Although studies have analysed the use of percutaneous measures such as coils, plugs, or second occluder device deployment in LAA with peri-device leak (PDL), use of percutaneous occlude devices in surgically occluded LAA is far less studied.

Case summary

We present a case of a 79-year-old female patient who underwent LAAO device deployment within a surgically occluded LAA with PDL. She underwent 27 mm LAAO device (WATCHMANTM) deployment and all the P.A.S.S. (Position, Anchor, Size, and Seal) criteria were satisfied. Only 1.4 mm PDL was present. She was continued on apixaban and aspirin post-operatively. Post-operative transoesophageal echocardiogram at 6 weeks demonstrated trivial PDL measuring 1.49 mm. Patient was continued on aspirin and clopidogrel, with discontinuation of apixaban.

Discussion

Percutaneous LAAO device deployment in previously surgically ligated LAA with incomplete exclusion is a potential therapeutic option for patients with AF and a high bleeding risk seeking a minimally invasive strategy, in an attempt to de-escalate anticoagulation therapy.

Use of Computed Tomography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Procedure Planning and Post-Procedure Assessment

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to systemic anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with increased risk for thromboembolic events. Pre- and post-procedural imaging is essential for technical success, allowing practitioners to identify contraindications, select appropriate devices, and recognize procedural complications. Although transesophageal echocardiography has traditionally served as the preeminent imaging modality in LAAO, cardiac computed tomography imaging has emerged as a noninvasive surrogate given its excellent isotropic spatial resolution, multiplanar reconstruction capability, rapid temporal resolution, and large field of view.

Clinical significance of gastrointestinal bleeding history in patients who undergo left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anticoagulant users with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) sometimes suffer from gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and have difficulty continuing the medication. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been developed for such situations. We aimed to clarify the clinical significance of a history of GIB in comparison to other factors in patients who had undergone LAAC.

METHODS

From October 2019 to September 2023, patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC at our hospital were enrolled. We investigated the percentage of patients with a history of GIB who underwent LAAC and compared the incidence of post-LAAC bleeding in these patients compared to those with other factors.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients were included. There were 19 patients (42%) with a history of GIB who underwent LAAC. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of bleeding complications after LAAC was significantly higher in patients with a history of GIB in comparison to patients with other factors. There were eight cases of post-LAAC bleeding in total, and seven cases had GIB.

CONCLUSIONS

We need to recognize that GIB is a significant complication in patients who undergo LAAC. The management of GIB by gastroenterologists is essential to the success of LAAC.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and the cause of thromboembolic events in elderly patients worldwide. AF is associated with a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to cardiac emboli, primarily from left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. Oral anticoagulation therapy is the standard treatment to effectively reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with AF. However, anticoagulation treatment increases bleeding risk. LAA closure (LAAC) has recently been introduced as a feasible mechanical preventive intervention for thromboembolic events while minimizing the risk of bleeding. Transcatheter LAAC devices have evolved in the past decade, and several ongoing trials have demonstrated the improvements of safety and outcomes in newer generation devices. This review summarizes the current perspectives and outcomes regarding LAAC as an alternative to pharmacologic therapy.

Symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic device-related thrombus after LAAC: a sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry

BACKGROUND

Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed.

METHODS

The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared.

RESULTS

Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37-558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%).

CONCLUSION

Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events.

Echocardiography in Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Related Complications

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a devastating disease with a large global prevalence. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a major source of thrombi in patients with AF. Echocardiography plays an important role in identifying LAA thrombi and has become an invaluable imaging tool in planning for LAA occlusion (LAAO) in patients intolerant to anticoagulation. This review article will discuss the role of echocardiography in selecting patients for LAAO, intraprocedural monitoring, and identifying procedure-related complications.

Left atrial appendage occlusion in an older population cohort

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is a major risk factor for stroke, with an incidence rate of 4-5% per year. The use of DOACs is recommended for specific patient populations however the risk of bleeding commonly precludes their use. Left atrial appendage occlusion is a relatively novel procedure recommended for such patients. We set out to analyse the initial success and safety of this procedure in a single site.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included in the study with an average age of 81 years. Seventy percent (n = 14) were male. Ninety percent (n = 18) had a history of major bleeding, an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation. The mean CHADS2VaSc and HASBLED scores were 4.75 and 3.7, respectively. The technical success rate was 95% comparable with existing data. The procedural success rate in our study was 80%. The most frequent complication was cardiac tamponade, occurring in 10% of cases.

CONCLUSION

We report lower technical success and procedural success rates in an older population cohort than historically studied, 90% of whom had an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation, with higher CHADS2VaSc and HASBLED scores than commonly studied.

Left atrial appendage occlusion using the LAmbre device in atrial fibrillation patients with a history of ischemic stroke: 1-Year outcomes from a multicenter study in China

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and previous stroke have a significantly higher risk of stroke recurrence. This study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of the LAmbre left atrial appendage occlusion device in NVAF patients with a history of stroke.

METHODS

We examined 103 consecutive NVAF patients in 11 Chinese medical centers who had a history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIA) and underwent placement of the LAmbre device. Follow-up was conducted 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. The primary endpoints were the incidence of new ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, or cardiac death. Secondary endpoints were serious perioperative or device-related complications and cerebral, gastrointestinal, or other bleeding events requiring transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 67.63 ± 7.14 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.72 ± 1.18 and mean HAS-BLED score was 1.90 ± 1.00. LAmbre device placement was successful in 101 patients (98.05%). Mean follow-up was 12.2 months. Five patients (4.95%) developed a new pericardial effusion after the procedure; none required treatment. Eighty-six patients (85.15%) exhibited no peri-device leak (PDL). However, 13 (12.8%) had a small (0-3 mm) PDL and two (2.3%) had a moderate PDL (3-5 mm). One recurrent stroke occurred during follow-up (1.1%). No other complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study shows the safety and efficacy of LAmbre left atrial appendage occlusion for NVAF patients with a history of stroke or TIA.

The role of CT in arrhythmia management-treatment planning and post-procedural imaging surveillance

Several interventional treatment options exist in patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiac CT is routinely performed prior to occlusion of the left atrial appendage, pulmonary vein isolation, and cardiac device implantation. Besides the evaluation of coronary artery disease, cardiac CT provides isotropic, high-resolution CT images of the cardiac anatomy with the possibility of multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional reconstructions which are helpful to guide interventional treatment. In addition, cardiac CT is increasingly used to rapidly evaluate periprocedural complications and for the routine post-procedural imaging surveillance in patients after interventions. This review article will discuss current applications of pre- and post-interventional CT imaging in patients with arrhythmia.

Mechanism and management of leaks arising after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)

This article reviews the latest available data in regard to the diagnosis, management, and intervention of both central and peri-device leaks that arise after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). The aim of this article is to have a better understanding of both addressing leaks arising after LAAC, and which interventions and closure methods are best served for each type of residual leak based on etiology, size, and operator experience.

Mid-Term Feasibility of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Elderly Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) therapy using the WATCHMAN system has been introduced to prevent thrombosis and minimize the use of anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Given the high risk of bleeding and stroke in elderly patients, these patients would be good candidates for this therapy. However, the efficacy and feasibility of LAAO therapy in elderly patients remains uncertain.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent LAAO therapy using the WATCHMAN system in a large academic center between June 2020 and March 2023 were included. The safety and efficacy of LAAO therapy during the 1-year observation period in patients aged ≥85 years old were compared with those in the younger cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients (78.4 ± 6.9 years old, 133 male patients) were included. 34 patients were ≥85 years old, 96 were between 75 and 84 years old, and 58 were <75 years old. The elderly group had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score and were at greater risk of falling-related bleeding compared with the younger cohort. The device implantations were successful in all patients except for one. During the 1-year observation period, one patient had a peri-device leak >5 mm and there were 6 device-related cases of thrombosis, whose incidence was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.98). The cumulative incidences of bleeding and thrombotic events in the elderly group were as low as in the younger cohort (p > 0.05 for both). Most anticoagulants were terminated regardless of age.

CONCLUSION

The mid-term feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous LAAO therapy using the WATCHMAN system in elderly patients aged ≥85 years were as acceptable as in the younger cohort.

Left atrial appendage sizing for percutaneous closure in virtual reality-a feasibility study

Background and aims

The complex and highly variable three-dimensional anatomy of the left atrial appendage (LAA) makes planning and device sizing for interventional occlusion procedures (LAAC) challenging. Several imaging modalities [e.g. echocardiography, multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT)] are used for this purpose. Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging imaging technique to immerse into a three-dimensional left atrium and appendage, offering unprecedented options of visualization and measurement. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility of visualizing the LAA in VR for preprocedural planning of LAAC.

Methods and results

Twenty-one patients (79 ± 7 years, 62% male) who underwent LAAC at University Hospital Düsseldorf were included in our study. A dedicated software generated three-dimensional VR models from preprocedural MSCT imaging data. Conventional measurements of LAA dimensions (ostium, landing zone and depth) using a commercially available software were compared to measurements in VR: MSCT and VR ostium min. (r = 0.93), max. (r = 0.80) and mean (r = 0.88, all p < 0.001) diameters as well as landing zone (LZ) min. (r = 0.84), max. (r = 0.86) and mean diameters (r = 0.90, all p < 0.001) showed strong correlations. Three-dimensional orientation was judged superior by physicians in VR compared to MSCT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Virtual reality visualization of the left atrium and appendage based on MSCT data is feasible and allows precise and reproducible measurements in planning of LAA occlusion procedures with enhanced 3D orientation. Further studies need to explore additional benefits of three-dimensional visualization for operators in preprocedural planning.

Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and complications of left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device between males and females

AIMS

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with WATCHMAN device is being used for patients with atrial fibrillation (AFB) and, as an off-label use, atrial flutter (AFL) who can't comply with long-term anticoagulation. We aim to study the differences in outcomes between sexes in patients undergoing Watchman device implantation.

METHODOLOGY

The National Inpatient Sample was queried between 2016 and 2019 using ICD-10 clinical modification codes I48x for AFB and AFL. Patients who underwent LAAO were identified using the procedural code 02L73DK. Comorbidities and complications were identified using ICD procedure and diagnosis codes. Differences in primary outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

38 105 admissions were identified, of which 16 795 (44%) were females (76 ± 7.6 years) and 21 310 (56%) were males (75 ± 8 years). Females were more likely to have cardiac (frequencies: 5.8% vs 3.75%, aOR: 1.5 [1.35-1.68], p1 day inpatient (1.79 [1.67-1.93], P < 0.01) and be discharged to a facility (1.54 [1.33-1.80], P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Females are more likely to develop cardiac, renal, bleeding, pulmonary and TEE-related complications following LAAO procedure, while concurrently showing higher mortality, length of stay and discharge to facilities.

Echocardiographic Imaging in Transcatheter Structural Intervention: An AAE Review Paper

Transcatheter structural heart intervention (TSHI) has gained popularity over the past decade as a means of cardiac intervention in patients with prohibitive surgical risks. Following the exponential rise in cases and devices developed over the period, there has been increased focus on developing the role of "structural imagers" amongst cardiologists. This review, as part of a growing initiative to develop the field of interventional echocardiography, aims to highlight the role of echocardiography in myriad TSHIs available within Asia. We first discuss the various echocardiography-based imaging modalities, including 3-dimensional echocardiography, fusion imaging, and intracardiac echocardiography. We then highlight a selected list of structural interventions available in the region-a combination of established interventions alongside novel approaches-describing key anatomic and pathologic characteristics related to the relevant structural heart diseases, before delving into various aspects of echocardiography imaging for each TSHI.

Safety and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure-A Nationwide Analysis

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) not suitable for anticoagulation therapy. Real-world data on peri-procedural outcomes are limited. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of peri-procedural safety and healthcare resource utilization in 11,240 adult patients undergoing LAAC in the United States between 2016 and 2019. Primary outcomes (safety) were in-hospital ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE), pericardial effusion (PE), major bleeding, device embolization and mortality. Secondary outcomes (resource utilization) were adverse discharge disposition, hospital length of stay (LOS) and costs. Logistic and Poisson regression models were used to analyze outcomes by adjusting for 10 confounders. SE decreased by 97% between 2016 and 2019 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0-0.24] (p = 0.003), while a trend to lower numbers of other peri-procedural complications was determined. In-hospital mortality (0.14%) remained stable. Hospital LOS decreased by 17% (0.78-0.87, p < 0.001) and adverse discharge rate by 41% (95% CI 0.41-0.86, p = 0.005) between 2016 and 2019, while hospital costs did not significantly change (p = 0.2). Female patients had a higher risk of PE (OR 2.86 [95% CI 2.41-6.39]) and SE (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.28-43.6]) while multi-morbid patients had higher risks of major bleeding (p < 0.001) and mortality (p = 0.031), longer hospital LOS (p < 0.001) and increased treatment costs (p = 0.073). Significant differences in all outcomes were observed between male and female patients across US regions. In conclusion, LAAC has become a safer and more efficient procedure. Significant sex differences existed across US regions. Careful considerations should be taken when performing LAAC in female and comorbid patients.

Peri- and Post-procedural Anticoagulation with Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices

In patients with atrial fibrillation and high stroke risk, anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists is the standard of care for stroke prevention. The benefit of anticoagulation is driven by attenuating the risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion offers an alternative therapeutic strategy for stroke prevention in patients with high bleeding risk or contraindications for long-term anticoagulation. This review of the current literature delineates the standard protocols of peri- and post-procedural anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion, the complications of the procedure, and the risk of device-related thrombosis and of incomplete occlusion of the appendage. Finally,the limitations and gaps in the literature are identified.

Impact of Preprocedural Computed Tomography on Left Atrial Appendage Closure Success: A Swiss-Apero Trial Subanalysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit related to the use of preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on top of periprocedural echocardiography to plan percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the impact of preprocedural CCTA on LAAC procedural success.

METHODS

In the investigator-initiated SWISS-APERO (Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure) trial, patients undergoing echocardiography-guided LAAC were randomly assigned to receive the Amulet (Abbott) or Watchman 2.5/FLX (Boston Scientific) device across 8 European centers. According to the study protocol ongoing at the time of the procedure, the first operators had (CCTA unblinded group) or did not have (CCTA blinded group) access to preprocedural CCTA images. In this post hoc analysis, we compared blinded vs unblinded procedures in terms of procedural success defined as complete left atrial appendage occlusion as evaluated at the end of LAAC (short-term) or at the 45-day follow-up (long-term) without procedural-related complications.

RESULTS

Among 219 LAACs preceded by CCTA, 92 (42.1%) and 127 (57.9%) were assigned to the CCTA unblinded and blinded group, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, operator unblinding to preprocedural CCTA remained associated with a higher rate of short-term procedural success (93.5% vs 81.1%; P = 0.009; adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.05-7.29; P = 0.040) and long-term procedural success (83.7% vs 72.4%; P = 0.050; adjusted OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.03-4.35; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective multicenter cohort of clinically indicated echocardiography-guided LAACs, unblinding of the first operators to preprocedural CCTA images was independently associated with a higher rate of both short- and long-term procedural success. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the impact of preprocedural CCTA on clinical outcomes.

Pre-cath Laboratory Planning for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion - Optional or Essential?

In the wake of rapid advancement in cardiovascular procedural technologies, physician-led preprocedural planning utilizing multi-modality imaging training is increasingly recognized as invaluable for procedural accuracy. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is one such procedure in which complications such as device leak, cardiac injury, and device embolization can be decreased substantially with incorporation of physician driven imaging and digital tools. We discuss the benefits of cardiac CT and 3D printing in preprocedural planning for the Heart Team, as well as novel applications by physicians of intraprocedural 3D angiography and dynamic fusion imaging. Furthermore, incorporation of computational modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) may yield promise. For optimal patient-centric procedural success, we advocate for standardized preprocedural imaging planning by physicians within the Heart Team as an essential part of LAAO.

Appropriate Use Criteria of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Latest Evidences

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrythmia and it is linked to an increased risk of stroke. Even if anticoagulation therapy reduces the rate of stroke the benefits of this therapy have to been balanced with the increased risk of hemorrhagic event. Left atrial appendage closure is a valid alternative to long term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high hemorrhagic risk. Actually new devices with different features have been tested and introduced progressively in the clinical practice. Improvements preprocedural imaging evaluation and the learning curve of the operators led to percutaneous left atrial appendage closure a safe and effective procedure. A good knowledge of different devices and the technique of implant is necessary for optimization percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and the reduction of complications during the acute phase and follow up.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Elderly: Insights From PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL, and Continuous Access Registries

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in elderly patients are limited.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the outcomes of LAAO between patients ≥80 and <80 years of age.

METHODS

We included patients enrolled in randomized trials and nonrandomized registries of the Watchman 2.5 device. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular/unknown death, stroke, or systemic embolism at 5 years. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular/unknown death, stroke, systemic embolism, and major and nonprocedural bleeding. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards, and competing risk analysis methods. Interaction terms were used to compare the 2 age groups. We also estimated the average treatment effect of the device with the use of inverse probability weighting.

RESULTS

We studied 2,258 patients, of whom 570 (25.2%) were ≥80 years old, and 1,688 (74.8%) were <80 years old. Procedural complications at 7 days were similar in both age groups. The primary endpoint occurred in 12.0% in the device group vs 13.8% in the control group (HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6-1.4) among patients <80 years of age and in 25.3% vs 21.7%, respectively (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-2.0) among patients ≥80 (interaction P value = 0.48). There was no interaction between age and treatment effect for any of the secondary outcomes. The average treatment effects of LAAO (compared with warfarin) were similar in the elderly population (compared with younger patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the higher event rates, octogenarians derive similar benefits from LAAO as their younger counterparts. Age alone should not preclude LAAO in otherwise suitable candidates.