Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device

Contemporary management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: The synergy of medical, revascularization, and device therapies

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading global cause of death, affecting millions and leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), a manifestation of IHD, results in severe left ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease and poses a significant challenge due to the complex pathophysiology, variable clinical presentation, and overall poor prognosis. Recent advances in medical therapy, device interventions, and revascularization techniques offer newfound hope in improving ICM patient outcomes. This article reviews the state-of-the-art management approaches for ICM, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment plans that integrate the various contemporary therapies to address the multiple mechanisms of disease development and progression. A meticulously tailored treatment approach for each individual patient offers the hope of prolonged survival through the synergy of therapies designed to address the different and complex mechanisms that contribute to their disease process.

First-Line Marshall Plan Approach in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Different ablation strategies have been developed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), but early management is still controversial. In the clinical setting of PeAF, the safety and efficacy of early Marshall plan have not yet been fully studied.

OBJECTIVES

Our prospective cohort study sought to: (1) assess the safety and feasibility of the thermal Marshall plan (MPA) approach as a first-line therapy in PeAF patients; (2) evaluate its long-term sinus rhythm maintenance efficacy; (3) identify the long-term predictive factors of AF recurrence in PeAF patients after MPA approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2020 and December 2023, 118 PeAF patients were selected for first intent Marshall plan ablation (MPA). Marshall vein failure occurred in 9/118 patients (7.6%). Accordingly, 109 patients who underwent MPA as first-line therapy were included. After the blanking period of 3 months, 62/109 patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) (57%), 33/109 were in AF (30.2%), 8/109 were in left atrial flutter (AFL) (7.3%), and six were in right AFL (5.5%). Re-ablation was performed in 4/33 patients (12.1%) and cardioversion in 29/33 (87.9%) for patients in AF at 3 months after healing. All patients in AFL at 3 months were re-ablated and all recovered SR. At 12 months postablation, two patients were lost to follow-up (1.8%), 94/107 (87.8%) were in SR and 13/107 had AF recurrence (12.2%). At 21 ± 11 months postablation, 81/107 (75.7%) were in SR at the last control, and 26/107 (24.3%) had AF recurrence. The ablation procedure ratio was 1.17 (109 primo ablation, 18 re-ablation). The only predictive factors of late AF recurrence after first-line PeAF MPA were both left atrial dilatation and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-life prospective cohort study showed that de novo MPA in PeAF is feasible, relatively safe, and associated with a high rate of freedom from arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow-up. The percentage of patients remaining in SR during long-term follow-up was close to 76%. The only predictive MPA failure factors were both left atrial dilatation and low LVEF.

Heart Failure and Arrhythmias: Circadian and Epigenetic Interplay in Myocardial Electrophysiology

Emerging evidence underscores the impact of circadian rhythms on cardiovascular processes, particularly in conditions such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, and heart failure, where circadian rhythm disruptions are linked to disease progression and adverse clinical outcomes. Circadian clock proteins are intricately linked to myocardial electrophysiological remodeling and epigenetic pathways associated with arrhythmias in heart failure. In the context of heart failure, circadian clock dysregulation leads to electrophysiological remodeling in the cardiomyocytes, which can precipitate life-threatening arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). This dysregulation may be influenced by environmental factors, such as diet and exercise, as well as genetic factors. Moreover, epigenetic modifications in heart failure have been implicated in the regulation of genes involved in cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and inflammation. The interplay between circadian clock proteins, myocardial electrophysiological remodeling, and epigenetic pathways in heart failure-related arrhythmias is complex and multifaceted. Further research is needed to elucidate how these processes interact and contribute to the development of arrhythmias in heart failure patients. This review aims to explore the connections between circadian rhythms, myocardial electrophysiology, and arrhythmias related to heart failure, with the goal of identifying potential therapeutic targets and interventions that may counteract the adverse effects of circadian disruptions on cardiovascular health.

Impact of catheter ablation on atrial fibrillation outcomes in various cardiomyopathies: findings from LGE-MRI quantified atrial fibrosis analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiomyopathy (CM) is associated with atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation (AF), often complicating rhythm management. Ventricular dysfunction contributes to AF through pressure and volume overload, while AF worsens ventricular function via tachycardia and irregular activation. Evidence suggests catheter ablation improves outcomes in CM patients, though success is influenced by the extent of atrial and ventricular remodeling.

METHODS

Patients undergoing their first catheter ablation for AF were divided into hypertrophic (HCM), ischemic (ICM), non-ischemic (NICM), and no-CM groups. Pre-ablation late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic imaging (LGE-MRI) was used to assess left atrial (LA) fibrosis burden and anatomical distribution. Patients were followed prospectively for arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 552 patients, 39 HCM (69% obstructive), 39 ICM, 115 with NICM, and 359 without CM were included between January 2015 and December 2022. LA fibrosis was significantly higher in patients with CM (19.1 ± 7.5% vs. 16.5 ± 6.9%; P = 0.01). HCM and ICM had the greatest LA fibrosis among the different CM subtypes (21.3 ± 8.7% and 21.9 ± 9.1%, respectively). There was no significant difference in the regional distribution of fibrosis among the various groups. AF recurrence was observed in 321 (58.2%) after 456 (175-1204) days. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared to no CM, HCM was associated with a three-fold increase in AF recurrence (HR = 3.07, 95% CI 2.06-4.58, P < 0.001), followed by ICM (HR 1.61, 95%, CI 0.95-2.72; P = 0.07) and NICM (HR of 1.53, 95% CI 1.14-2.06; P = 0.05). LA fibrosis and volume index were independently associated with recurrence (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.01 and HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, P = 0.01). Genetic testing revealed key distinctions between HCM and NICM, with MYBPC3 and MYH7 as prominent genes in HCM and a heterogeneous genetic basis in NICM.

CONCLUSION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with the highest risk of AF recurrence followed by ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy after catheter ablation. LA fibrosis regional patterns did not differ between cardiomyopathy types, while overall fibrosis and volume predicted recurrence.

Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and a reduced quality of life. The current standard of care, transcatheter pulmonary vein isolation using thermal ablation techniques, provides symptom relief but carries a risk of collateral tissue damage. In recent years, pulsed field ablation, a nonthermal technique based on irreversible electroporation, has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional thermal ablation methods.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of pulsed field ablation, a novel nonthermal ablation technique. We briefly explain its biophysical principles and general technical aspects, describe currently available technologies, and summarize findings from clinical studies. Additionally, we discuss its safety profile, unresolved issues, and limitations, while also exploring future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Pulsed field ablation offers distinct advantages over traditional thermal ablation methods, such as shorter procedure times and a favorable safety profile due to precise tissue targeting. Future improvements in ablation device design, energy delivery settings, integration with mapping systems, workflow efficiency, ablation protocols, and patient selection criteria are expected to further enhance clinical outcomes.

Atrial Fibrillation in End-Stage Heart Failure

End-stage heart failure (HF) accounts for 1% to 10% of all HF cases. It is frequently associated with coexistent atrial fibrillation due in part to structural changes related to altered hemodynamics, increased wall stress, and neurohormonal activation. The treatment remains challenging because of frequent atrial remodeling, comorbidities, and high recurrence rates. Studies have found no benefit of medical rhythm control compared with rate control. However, recent data suggest that catheter ablation might be associated with a reduction in HF symptomatology and all-cause mortality. Alternative treatment options including AV nodal ablation are available for refractory cases, but should not delay urgent heart transplantation.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) addresses the significant overlap of these conditions, often found in patients with comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. HFpEF is characterized by diastolic dysfunction, leading to high left atrial pressures and atrial remodeling, which promotes AF. While treatments for HFpEF are limited, recent studies suggest CA can reduce AF burden, improve quality-of-life, and lower hospitalization rates. Current and upcoming randomized trials aim to establish CA's role as a first-line therapy for AF in HFpEF, potentially transforming patient outcomes.

The Influence of Risk Factor Modification on Atrial Fibrillation Outcomes and Their Impact on the Success of Catheter Ablation

The global prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing with a significant increase in AF burden. The pathophysiology of AF is complex and exhibits a strong relationship with modifiable lifestyle AF risk factors, such as physical inactivity, smoking, obesity, and alcohol consumption, as well as co-morbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Current evidence suggests that cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle risk factor modification can potentially lower the overall AF burden. Additionally, AF ablation can be an effective treatment for a rhythm control strategy, but reducing AF recurrences post-catheter ablation is paramount. Thus, addressing these modifiable lifestyle risk factors and co-morbidities is critical, as the recent 2024 European Society of Cardiology AF guidance update highlights. A comprehensive approach to treating these risk factors is essential, especially given the rising prevalence of AF. This article provides a state-of-the-art update on the evidence of addressing AF-related risk factors and co-morbidities, particularly in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Rate Versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure

Atrial fibrillation with Heart Failure is a constellation of co-morbid conditions that now constitutes a major cardiovascular epidemic, with HF now the most common complication of AF. Mechanistically, both conditions promote substrate disease in the atrium and ventricle. AF is an independent rixk factor in HF progression and pump failure death. While early studies comparing rhythm control antiarrhythmic drugs and rate control drugs showed no significant benefit in cardiovascular outcomes, AF did promote HF emergence and hospitalizations. Newer rhythm control strategies with present day antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation support benefits in cardiovascular outcomes in AF with HF. Catheter ablation improved HF outcomes in HF with reduced ejection fraction but further and larger studies are needed, especially for AF with HF with preserved ejection fraction.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated catheter ablation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction reduces mortality and hospitalization as well as improves ventricular function, quality of life, and functional status. Catheter ablation has been shown to be superior to alternative rate and rhythm control strategies in these outcomes. Guidelines strongly support the use of catheter ablation to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Atrial Fibrillation Management with Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Comorbidity Treatment in Heart Failure Patients

Atrial myopathy is the underlying pathophysiological substrate of atrial fibrillation and contributes to the risk of heart failure as well. Atrial myopathy is caused by classic risk factors such as obesity, inflammation, diabetes, hypertension, and frequent alcohol use, in addition to structural heart and lung diseases that cause atrial pressure or volume overload. An optimal management of atrial fibrillation includes careful assessment of contributors to atrial myopathy, which can be treated by guideline-recommended medical therapies for heart failure, adequate control of congestion, and treatment of comorbid conditions such as sleep apnea syndrome. This approach works synergistically with rhythm control.

Global Research Progress on Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiology

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become a cornerstone in treating cardiac arrhythmias, offering a minimally invasive approach to managing conditions such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and other rhythm disorders. The historical evolution of RFA, from its early inception to its current state, underscores the technological advancements that have significantly enhanced its efficacy and safety. Global trends indicate a steady increase in the adoption of RFA, with notable research contributions from North America, Europe, and Asia. Comparative studies reveal outcome variability driven by differences in patient populations, procedural techniques, and healthcare infrastructures. Despite its success, RFA faces challenges, including complications related to the procedure, patient selection, and long-term efficacy. Emerging technologies, such as integrating artificial intelligence and enhanced imaging modalities, hold promise for overcoming these barriers and further refining the procedure. Gaps in current research are identified, particularly in understanding the long-term outcomes of RFA and its application in complex arrhythmias. The critical role of RFA in modern cardiology is emphasized, along with the potential for future innovations that could expand its therapeutic utility. This synthesis of the latest evidence provides valuable insights for optimizing the use of RFA in managing cardiac arrhythmias.

Impact of Diagnosis to Ablation Time on Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Outcomes After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data

BACKGROUND

Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relative to the diagnosis time. We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on clinical outcomes after AF ablation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2024. Pairwise, prognostic, and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were conducted using R V. 4.3.1. Our primary end point was time to first AF recurrence, with secondary end points of all-cause mortality, tamponade, stroke, and heart failure.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 23 studies with 43 711 patients. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with reduced AF recurrence across both paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups (P<0.01). There was a significant decrease in benefit for paroxysmal AF over time and a slight decrease in benefit for persistent AF over time. However, the benefit remained significant in both over time. DAT per year was significantly associated with a 10% increased risk of AF recurrence. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that DAT >1 year was significantly associated with a 70% increased risk of AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF and 30% in persistent AF. DAT ≤1 year was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality (P<0.01) and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke (P=0.08). However, there was no significant difference in heart failure between DAT ≤1 year and DAT >1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Early ablation is more beneficial in paroxysmal AF, with a notable decrease in benefit over time, while in persistent AF, the benefit remains significant but slightly decreases over time. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?; Unique identifier: CRD42024525542.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Hypertension and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the effect of radiofrequency ablation can be improved by using sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) to control blood pressure in hypertensive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A total of 63 and 67 hypertension patients with persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled in an S/V group and ACEI/ARB group, respectively. All patients underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The blood pressure of the two groups was controlled within the range of 100-140 mmHg (high pressure) and 60-90 mmHg (low pressure). The clinical outcomes of the two groups were observed after 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

No significant differences in blood pressure were observed between the S/V and ACEI/ARB groups. In addition, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation between the two groups was not different. The left atrial diameter was an independent predictor of recurrence (HR = 1.063, P = 0.008). However, in the heart failure subgroup, the recurrence rate of S/V was significantly lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group (P = 0.005), and Cox regression analysis showed that the recurrence risk of atrial fibrillation of the S/V group was 0.302 lower than that of the ACEI/ARB group. NT-proBNP, LVEF, and LAD were significantly improved in hypertension patients with heart failure when comparing cases before and at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

S/V is better than ACEI/ARB in reducing the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension and heart failure after RFCA.

Effects of atrial fibrillation ablation on arrhythmia burden and ventricular function in end-stage heart failure: Lessons from CASTLE-HTx

AIMS

The CASTLE-HTx trial showed the benefit of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation compared to medical therapy in decreasing mortality, need for left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation (HTx) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Herein we describe the effects of catheter ablation on AF burden, arrhythmia recurrences, and ventricular function in end-stage HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CASTLE-HTx protocol randomized 194 patients in end-stage HF with AF to catheter ablation and medical therapy or medical therapy alone. AF burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and type of AF were assessed at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Overall, 97 patients received ablation; 66 patients (68%) underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and 31 patients (32%) were treated with PVI and additional ablation. Electroanatomic mapping showed the extent of left atrial low voltage (cardiomyopathy) >10% in 31 (31.9%) patients. At 12 months post-ablation, persistent AF was present in 31/89 patients (34.8%), which was significantly less frequent compared to baseline (p = 0.0001). Median AF burden reduction was 36.3 (interquartile range 13.6-63.3) percentage points at 12 months and LVEF improved from 29.2 ± 6.2% to 39.1 ± 8.3% (p < 0.001) following ablation. AF burden reduction <50% was significantly associated with LVEF improvement ≥5% at 12 months after ablation (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation ablation in end-stage HF leads to a substantial decrease in AF burden, a regression from persistent to paroxysmal AF and notably improved LVEF. Favourable ablation outcomes were observed in patients regardless of the presence or absence of signs indicating left atrial cardiomyopathy.

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation after acute decompensated heart failure Attack: Earlier is Better?

Background

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is often accompanied by persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal timing for RFCA in patients with persistent AF and ADHF is still uncertain.

Objectives

The aim of this observational cohort study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of early RFCA in patients with persistent AF after ADHF attack.

Methods

Patients with persistent AF and ADHF who underwent early RFCA as soon as the ADHF symptoms were initially controlled (Early group, n = 63) and those who received elective procedures after a transitional period (Elective group, n = 67) were investigated. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 50 matched pairs were analyzed.

Results

The overall procedural complication rates were similar (Early group: 6.0 %, n = 3; Elective group: 6.0 %, n = 3; P = 1.000). Patients in the early group had significantly less HF rehospitalization than the elective group during the 1-year post-procedure follow-up period (Mantel-Cox test: P = 0.036; HR: 0.369; 95 %CI: 0.145-0.938), though AF recurrence showed no difference (Mantel-Cox test: P = 0.645; HR: 1.204; 95 %CI: 0.547-2.648). A 90-day rehospitalization rate was significantly higher in the transitional period in the elective group, compared with patients who already received early RFCA (Elective group: 13, 26.0 %; Early group: 2, 4.0 %; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Early RFCA therapy for persistent AF after ADHF attack was safe and effective. Patients who received early RFCA therapy had significantly less HF rehospitalization in the 1-year post-procedure follow-up period. On the other hand, the elective procedure was accompanied by a higher risk of HF rehospitalization during the waiting period.

Comparison of the Latest ESC, ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS, and CCS Guidelines on the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The introduction of evidence-based and structured guidelines has undoubtedly improved the care of cardiologic patients and in many cases simplified decision-making for the treatment team. The European Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, and the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society have developed guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Because all 3 guidelines refer to almost the same scientific data, their recommendations are undoubtedly largely in agreement. Nevertheless, there are some interesting differences based on different interpretations of the same study, different publication dates, or differences in local conditions and health care resources. The following article aims at lining out these similarities and differences.

Atrial Fibrillation: A Review

Importance

In the US, approximately 10.55 million adults have atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is associated with significantly increased risk of stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and mortality.

Observations

Symptoms of AF include palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, presyncope, exertional intolerance, and fatigue, although approximately 10% to 40% of people with AF are asymptomatic. AF can be detected incidentally during clinical encounters, with wearable devices, or through interrogation of cardiac implanted electronic devices. In patients presenting with ischemic stroke without diagnosed AF, an implantable loop recorder (ie, subcutaneous telemetry device) can evaluate patients for intermittent AF. The 2023 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Guideline writing group proposed 4 stages of AF evolution: stage 1, at risk, defined as patients with AF-associated risk factors (eg, obesity, hypertension); stage 2, pre-AF, signs of atrial pathology on electrocardiogram or imaging without AF; stage 3, the presence of paroxysmal (recurrent AF episodes lasting ≤7 days) or persistent (continuous AF episode lasting >7 days) AF subtypes; and stage 4, permanent AF. Lifestyle and risk factor modification, including weight loss and exercise, to prevent AF onset, recurrence, and complications are recommended for all stages. In patients with estimated risk of stroke and thromboembolic events of 2% or greater per year, anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant reduces stroke risk by 60% to 80% compared with placebo. In most patients, a direct oral anticoagulant, such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban, is recommended over warfarin because of lower bleeding risks. Compared with anticoagulation, aspirin is associated with poorer efficacy and is not recommended for stroke prevention. Early rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation to restore and maintain sinus rhythm is recommended by the 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for some patients with AF. Catheter ablation is first-line therapy in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF to improve symptoms and slow progression to persistent AF. Catheter ablation is also recommended for patients with AF who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to improve quality of life, left ventricular systolic function, and cardiovascular outcomes, such as rates of mortality and heart failure hospitalization.

Conclusions and Relevance

AF is associated with increased rates of stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Lifestyle and risk factor modification are recommended to prevent AF onset, recurrence, and complications, and oral anticoagulants are recommended for those with an estimated risk of stroke or thromboembolic events of 2% or greater per year. Early rhythm control using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation is recommended in select patients with AF experiencing symptomatic paroxysmal AF or HFrEF.

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

PURPOSE

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) has shown promising results in reducing mortality and improving heart function. However, previous studies have been limited by a lack of control groups and significant heterogeneity in their methodologies.

HYPOTHESIS

CA for AF in HFPEF patients may not increase the complications and had similarly the rate of freedom from AF vs. patients without HFPEF, and it may reduce hospitalizations and mortality and improve heart function VS medical treatment.

METHODS

Three groups of AF patients were included in the study: 187 patients with HFPEF for their first CA (AFPHF-CA), 187 patients with HFPEF who were undergoing medical therapy (AFPHF-Med), and 196 patients without HFPEF for their first CA (AF-CA).

RESULTS

After a mean (± SD) follow-up of 36 ± 3 months, 50.8% of patients in the AFPHF-CA group and 52.0% in the AF-CA group remained in sinus rhythm (P = 0.94), compared to only 12.5% in the AFPHF-Med group (P < 0.001). Age (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08, P = 0.016), duration of AF history (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.017), left atrial diameter (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.06-2.19, P = 0.024), and the type of atrial fibrillation (OR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.28-12.62, P = 0.017) were consistent multivariable predictors for sinus rhythm maintenance in AFPHF. HF hospitalization was significantly lower in the AFPHF-CA group (0.38 (0,2)) than in the AFPHF-Med group (1.28(0,3), P < 0.001) during the follow-up. Stroke occurred in 18 of 187 (9.63%) patients in the AFPHF-CA group, significantly lower than the AFPHF-Med group, with approximately 31 of 187 (16.58%) (P < 0.01), but not statistically different from AF-CA, where approximately 17 of 196 (8.67%) experienced stroke (P = 0.65). Regarding mortality, death occurred in 12.8% of patients in the AFPHF-Med group, higher than 7.5% in the AFPHF-CA group and 6.6% in the AF-CA group (P = 0.49). Significant improvements in heart function were observed in the AFPHF-CA group compared to the AFPHF-Med group, including reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P < 0.001), New York Heart Association classification (P < 0.001), left ventricular mass index (P < 0.001), and left atrial volume index (P < 0.001). HF hospitalization was significantly lower in the AFPHF-CA group compared to AFPHF-Med (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CA for AF has showed significant benefits in patients with HFPEF compared to medical treatment alone. These benefits include improvements in heart function, reduced mortality, incidence of stroke, and hospitalizations. Importantly, CA in HFPEF patients showed comparable maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) and safety outcomes when compared to CA in individuals with normal heart function.

Different Approaches to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure Patients: Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has been proven beneficial in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). On top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), additional ablation strategies such as empirical lines/posterior box/low voltage ablation (PVI+L/LVA) are often used. Whether PVI+L/LVA provides additional benefits in this population has never been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze the temporal trends and comparative outcomes of PVI+L/LVA vs PVI alone.

METHODS

Patients with HFrEF undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation were retrospectively enrolled. The 2 coprimary endpoints were ventricular function recovery and atrial fibrillation recurrence-free survival at 1 year. The performance of PVI and PVI+L/LVA was compared in the overall population and in 2 matched groups. A sensitivity analysis for measured confounders was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 955 HFrEF patients (62.1 years, 24.4% female) from 9 international centers were included (PVI only 51.6% vs PVI+L/LVA 48.4%). At 12 months after the procedure, 62.3% of the patients remained free from arrhythmia recurrences and 65.4% experienced ventricular function recovery. Comparing PVI to PVI+L/LVA, no significant difference in the 2 coprimary endpoints was observed, neither in the overall nor in the matched cohorts. The use of PVI+L/LVA increased from 27% in 2013 to 68% in 2022. Patients undergoing PVI+L/LVA experienced more complications (3.8 vs 1.2%; P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation is associated with significant improvements in systolic function, irrespective of the ablation strategy used. The use of PVI+L/LVA in HFrEF patients is progressively expanding over time. Although the benefits of this practice remain unproven, it is associated with an increased risk of overall and nonvascular complications. These results warrant caution regarding the growing use of PVI+ in HFrEF patients.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until February 2024 were systematically searched. Given the limited number of randomized studies, propensity score-matched observational studies comparing CA with SMT in AF patients with HFpEF were also included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.

RESULTS

Eight studies that enrolled 17,717 SMT and 2537 CA patients were included. CA was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85). The risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.83), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84), and AF recurrence (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.73) were also lower in the CA group.

CONCLUSION

CA demonstrated significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits compared to SMT in the HFpEF population.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation During Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure: Feasibility and Role of Pulsed Field Ablation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause or aggravate heart failure (HF). Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for AF. This study focused on the feasibility and outcomes of emergent AF ablation performed during hospitalization for acute HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent emergent CA for AF during hospitalization for acute HF in 2018-2024. Arrhythmia recurrence was the primary endpoint. The combination of arrhythmia recurrence, HF hospitalization, and all-cause death was the secondary endpoint. Patients were censored 1 year after the index procedure. We included 46 patients, 35% females, with median age of 67 [interquartile rage: 61, 72] years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25 [23, 28]%. Thermal CA was performed in 14 patients, and pulsed field ablation (PFA) in 32 patients. Procedure time was significantly shorter with PFA compared to thermal CA (77 [57, 91] vs. 166 [142, 200] minutes, p < 0.001). Fluoroscopy time was longer with PFA (9.5 [7.6, 12.0] vs. 3.9 [2.9, 6.0] minutes, p < 0.001), with a borderline trend towards higher radiation dose (75 [53, 170] vs. 50 [30, 94] μGy.m2, p = 0.056). Extrapulmonary ablation was frequent (86% and 84% for thermal CA and PFA, p > 0.9). The estimated freedom from the primary endpoint was 79% after PFA and 64% after thermal CA (p = 0.44). The estimated freedom from the secondary endpoint was 76% after PFA and 57% after thermal CA (p = 0.43). LVEF improved by 24% ± 2% (p < 0.001) in patients with the first manifestation of HF and by 14% ± 4% (p = .004) in patients with decompensated HF diagnosed earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent CA of AF during acute HF hospitalization is safe and associated with improved LVEF and good clinical outcomes. In the PFA era, the rate of these procedures is progressively increasing as they are readily available and easy to perform compared to thermal ablation.

Optimizing outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy: what do recent data and insights say?

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) in approximately two-thirds of recipients, with a third remaining CRT 'non-responders.' There is an increasing body of evidence exploring the reasons behind non-response, as well as ways to preempt or counteract it.

AREAS COVERED

This review will examine the most recent evidence regarding optimizing outcomes from CRT, as well as explore whether traditional CRT indeed remains the best first-line therapy for electrical resynchronization in HF. We will start by discussing methods of preempting non-response, such as refining patient selection and procedural technique, before reviewing how responses can be optimized post-implantation. For the purpose of this review, evidence was gathered from electronic literature searches (via PubMed and GoogleScholar), with a particular focus on primary evidence published in the last 5 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Ever-expanding research in the field of device therapy has armed physicians with more tools than ever to treat dyssynchronous HF. Newer developments, such as artificial intelligence (AI) guided device programming and conduction system pacing (CSP) are particularly exciting, and we will discuss how they could eventually lead to truly personalized care by maximizing outcomes from CRT.

Long-term impact of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of catheter ablation as a treatment approach for patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been inadequately investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study's objective was to assess the effectiveness of atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

METHODS

Utilizing the TriNetX research network, we identified individuals aged 18 and older with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concurrent heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from January 1, 2010, to June 1, 2021. Patients were further classified based on their catheter ablation procedure, using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Following propensity-score matching, each cohort consisted of 9440 patients. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at two years and secondary outcomes during the 2-year follow-up encompassing readmissions for heart failure, AF, and stroke.

RESULTS

In propensity-matched cohort, patients with AF and HFpEF who underwent AFA plus medical therapy had significantly lower all-cause mortality at two years than those who did not undergo AFA (hazard ratio (HR): 0.37, 95% CI: 0.34-0.40; P < 0.001) even after matching antiarrhythmic medications. At two years, secondary outcomes including HF readmissions (HR: 0.86 95% CI: 0.84-0.89; P < 0.001) and stroke readmissions (HR: 0.66 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; P < 0.001) were lower in the AFA group.

CONCLUSION

AFA amongst AF patients with concomitant HFpEF showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. It also leads to significant reductions in readmissions due to HF and ischemic stroke at two years.

Catheter ablation in rate-controlled atrial fibrillation with severely reduced ejection fraction: intervention for irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests atrial fibrillation (AF) causes cardiomyopathy due to remodeling driven by both irregular rate and rhythm. Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% has been shown to improve EF and mortality. It is unknown whether the benefits of AF ablation among patients with reduced EF are affected by the degree of pre-ablation rate control.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate AF ablation echocardiographic outcomes for patients who have EF ≤ 35% with varying degrees of pre-ablation rate control.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective study of patients with EF ≤ 35% undergoing first-time ablation of persistent AF. Primary analyses evaluated the degree to which pre-ablation rate control impacted echocardiographic outcomes. Rates of EF recovery to > 35% were compared at three different cutoffs: 110 bpm, 90 bpm, and 70 bpm. A linear regression analysis was then performed to evaluate whether baseline heart rate (HR) predicted change in EF.

RESULTS

Among 73 patients, the mean pre-ablation resting HR was 90 ± 25 bpm, and baseline EF was 27 ± 7%. Patients experienced significant improvements in EF by mean + 14% ± 11% (p < 0.001). Post-ablation EF recovery occurred in 60% of patients. No differences in EF improvement were detected at HR control targets of ≤ 110 bpm or ≤ 90 bpm, while patients achieving HR ≤ 70 bpm had less improvement in EF (+ 9% ± 9%) compared to those with HR above the cutoff (+ 16% ± 11%; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis did not reveal baseline HR as a significant predictor of change in LVEF (slope = 0.09, r2 = 0.05, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of persistent AF in patients with reduced EF frequently resulted in recovery in EF > 35%, irrespective of pre-ablation achieved rate control. While patients with HR > 70 bpm experienced a greater improvement in EF compared to those ≤ 70 bpm, patients with baseline HR below this target still experienced significant EF improvements. Further investigation into irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy is warranted.

Atrial Fibrillation Types and Chronic Kidney Disease are Independent Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation

Purpose

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is classified into paroxysmal, persistent, long-term persistent, and permanent types. It is commonly treated by radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which is more successful than conventional anti-arrhythmic drugs, but it is still largely unknown whether these beneficial effects are equally present for all AF types. Here, we evaluated the impact that AF type has on post-RFA patient conditions and identified underlying factors affecting AF prognoses.

Patients and Methods

Three hundred and twenty-nine AF patients who underwent RFA were retrospectively examined (221 paroxysmal, 56 persistent, 52 long-term persistent), during a post-RFA follow-up period, from 3-months to 2-years. Cardiac functional parameters, such as left atrial (LA), ventricular (LV), and pulmonary artery diameters, as well as ejection fraction (EF) and end-diastolic/systolic diameter ratio, were measured using echocardiography. Additionally, chronic kidney disease (CKD) was diagnosed among these AF patients, using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, and its impact on post-RFA patient outcomes was examined. Logistic regression analysis identified differences between AF and non-AF recurrence groups.

Results

In terms of functional parameters, persistent AF had significantly smaller LA, and larger EF, compared to paroxysmal and long-term persistent groups, while paroxysmal had significantly larger LV versus persistent and long-term persistent after RFA. For post-RFA patient conditions, paroxysmal, compared to persistent and long-term persistent, had significantly lower AF recurrence (18.10% versus 30.36% and 36.54%) and re-hospitalization rates (6.79% versus 14.29% and 19.23%); however, no significant difference was present between the 3 groups in terms of post-operative stroke rates, as well as re-hospitalization duration. Additionally, CKD patients, versus non-CKD, were more prone to AF recurrence and re-hospitalization, being 3.268 times more likely.

Conclusion

AF types and CKD were independent factors influencing AF recurrence, serving as highly sensitive predictors to monitor prognoses and guide treatments. Therefore, personalized treatment regimens should be recommended for different AF patients.

Spotlight on the 2024 ESC/EACTS management of atrial fibrillation guidelines: 10 novel key aspects

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) have recently released the 2024 guidelines for the management of AF. This review highlights 10 novel aspects of the ESC/EACTS 2024 Guidelines. The AF-CARE framework is introduced, a structural approach that aims to improve patient care and outcomes, comprising of four pillars: [C] Comorbidity and risk factor management, [A] Avoid stroke and thromboembolism, [R] Reduce symptoms by rate and rhythm control, and [E] Evaluation and dynamic reassessment. Additionally, graphical patient pathways are provided to enhance clinical application. A significant shift is the new emphasis on comorbidity and risk factor control to reduce AF recurrence and progression. Individualized assessment of risk is suggested to guide the initiation of oral anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolism. New guidance is provided for anticoagulation in patients with trigger-induced and device-detected sub-clinical AF, ischaemic stroke despite anticoagulation, and the indications for percutaneous/surgical left atrial appendage exclusion. AF ablation is a first-line rhythm control option for suitable patients with paroxysmal AF, and in specific patients, rhythm control can improve prognosis. The AF duration threshold for early cardioversion was reduced from 48 to 24 h, and a wait-and-see approach for spontaneous conversion is advised to promote patient safety. Lastly, strong emphasis is given to optimize the implementation of AF guidelines in daily practice using a patient-centred, multidisciplinary and shared-care approach, with the simultaneous launch of a patient version of the guideline.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: an Updated Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Age is a relevant risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with increased recurrence rates in the setting of rhythm control. Catheter ablation is increasingly advocated in elderly despite conflicting data regarding its efficacy and safety in this patient cohort. Therefore, we aimed to analyse currently available evidence regarding catheter ablation for AF in patients ≥ 75 years old compared with younger patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients ≥ 75 years old with AF. Primary efficacy and safety end points were first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after first-time ablation and occurrence of death, stroke, or any procedure-related complication. Secondary outcomes included procedure and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

We identified 301 potentially relevant studies, of which 39 underwent detailed analysis. A total of 19 studies (MINORS score ≥ 13) reporting on 108,419 patients (101,844 < 75 years, 6,575 ≥ 75 years of age) undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF were included. Risk of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation (39% vs 32%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41; P = 0.001) and occurrence of safety end points (10.8% vs 8.5%; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53-1.76; P < 0.00001) were significantly higher in patients ≥ 75 years of age than in younger patients. There was no difference concerning procedure (P = 0.33) or fluoroscopy time (P = 0.91) between younger and elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients ≥ 75 years of age, catheter ablation for AF has higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence and is associated with an increased risk of procedure-related complications and safety end point occurrence compared with younger patients.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Italian Registry in the Setting of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Rivaroxaban - IRIS

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation is routinely used to obtain rhythm control. Evidence suggest that catheter ablation should be done during uninterrupted oral anticoagulation.

METHODS

Italian Registry in the setting of atrial fibrillation ablation with rivaroxaban (IRIS) is an Italian multicenter, non-interventional, prospective study which enrolled 250 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients eligible for catheter ablation on rivaroxaban. The decision for rivaroxaban management was left to the physician: uninterrupted or shortly interrupted prior to Catheter ablation. Patients received a follow-up visit at 1 month and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, represented by all-cause death and systemic embolism at 1 month and 12 months was characterized by one transient ischemic attack and one myocardial infarction in the first 30 days. Both events happened in patients with shortly interrupted strategy (P=0.147), and both in patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (P=0.737). In the primary safety outcome represented by major bleeding we did not register any event in the 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcome constituted by minor bleeding registered 1 event, after the first 30 days since CA.

CONCLUSIONS

IRIS is the biggest real-life data registry regarding CA ablation on rivaroxaban in Italian setting, proving the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation or Pace and Ablate in Elderly Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (ABLATE Versus PACE)-Rationale, Methods, and Design

Age is a major risk-factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated hospitalisations. With increasing emphasis on rhythm control, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often suggested, even to elderly patients (≥ 75 years of age). Efficacy of PVI aiming at rhythm control is limited in persistent AF. Pacemaker implantation with atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation may represent a reasonable alternative, with the aim of controlling symptoms and improving quality of life in elderly patients. In this investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre trial, we test the hypothesis that pacemaker implantation and AVN ablation provides superior symptom control over PVI in elderly patients with symptomatic persistent AF, without any increase in adverse event profile. In the ABLATE Versus PACE (NCT04906668) prospective open-label superiority trial, 196 elderly patients with normal ejection fraction and symptomatic persistent AF despite guideline-indicated medical therapy will be randomised to either cryoballoon PVI (ABLATE) or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with subsequent AVN ablation (PACE), and followed for a minimum of 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite end point of rehospitalisation for atrial arrhythmia or cardiac decompensation/heart failure, (outpatient) electrical cardioversion, or upgrade to cardiac resynchronisation therapy owing to worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction to ≤ 35%. Secondary end points include death from any cause, stroke, quality of life, and procedure-related complications. Sample size is designed to achieve 80% power for the primary end point (2-tailed alpha of 5%). ABLATE Versus PACE will determine whether pacemaker implantation and AVN ablation can improve symptom-control in elderly patients with persistent AF over PVI without increasing safety end points.

Impact of Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Symptoms in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is more common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is often highly symptomatic. The impact of catheter ablation (CA) may be under-reported when evaluated by long-term freedom from any atrial arrhythmia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether CA of AF in patients with HCM would significantly reduce AF burden and improve symptoms.

METHODS

A multicenter registry was established to enroll HCM patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing CA of AF between 2017 and 2021. The first AF recurrence and burden 12 months before and after CA were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 81 HCM patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices underwent CA of AF. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1-year (35 [Q1-Q3: 23-50] months). AF was paroxysmal in 38 of 81 (46.9%) patients and burden pre-CA was 27.0% (Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 99.0%). A total of 35 (43.2%) patients had AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence within 12 months. AF burden reduced after CA to 0.5% (Q1-Q3 range: 0.0% to 11.1%) (P = 0.001); a 95% CI (13.8% to 100%) relative reduction. European Hearth Rhythm Association class improved by 1.8 ± 1.3 classes (P < 0.001). Of those with AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence, the reduction in AF burden was -33.7% (Q1-Q3: -88.9% to -13.8%) (P < 0.001) and 20 (57.1%) patients reported symptomatic improvement by ≥1 European Hearth Rhythm Association class. AF burden reduction was associated with symptomatic improvement. (r = -0.67; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is common after CA in HCM patients, but this may under-represent the impact of CA in this cohort. CA significantly reduced AF burden and improved symptoms. A comprehensive evaluation of AF burden, symptoms, and hard endpoints is needed to determine the utility of CA in this context.

Characterisation of patients who develop atrial fibrillation-induced cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF)-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is retrospectively defined after normalisation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in sinus rhythm. It is unclear why some patients develop AIC.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with AIC have a subtle cardiomyopathic process that precedes their AF-mediated LVEF reduction. Detailed assessment of cardiac function after successful catheter ablation will reveal this.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of measures to identify cardiomyopathic features that persist after LVEF normalisation in AIC.

METHODS

Patients with rate-controlled persistent AF and LVEF<50% undergoing catheter ablation (CA) were prospectively evaluated using echocardiography, cardio-pulmonary exercise testing and serum N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at baseline and 6 months after CA. Participants with AIC, (LVEF recovery (≥50%) and no other cause for cardiac dysfunction) were evaluated using left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (LARS). Changes in peak oxygen consumption and the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope were measured as markers of functional capacity and ventilatory inefficiency. A control group of patients with persistent AF with preserved LVEF were also enrolled.

RESULTS

34/41 (82.9%) participants recovered LVEF in sinus rhythm; defined as AIC. NT-proBNP levels were elevated in 18 (52.9%), and 16 reported ongoing heart failure (HF) symptoms. 10 (29.4%) had no improvement in functional capacity, and seven (20.6%) showed persistent ventilatory inefficiency. 20 (58.8%) had impaired global LV longitudinal strain with a relative apical sparing pattern. Nine (26.5%) had impaired LARS. There was an overlap of these abnormalities. 32 (94.1%) demonstrated at least one, 17 (50.0%) having no cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with preserved LVEF during persistent AF had similar demographics but a lower burden of short R-R intervals (<660 ms) on Holter monitoring.

DISCUSSION

Abnormal structural, metabolic and HF biomarkers are seen in patients with AIC in sinus rhythm. These features may represent a precedent subtle cardiomyopathic process predisposing them to left ventricular systolic dysfunction in AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04987723.

Ethanol marshall bundle elimination, pulmonary vein isolation, and linear ablation for atrial fibrillation with or without heart failure

Background

In medical practice, atrial fibrillation (AF) is intricately associated with heart failure (HF). Currently, ethanol infusion of vein of Marshall (EIVOM) for AF ablation in HF patients remains significantly limited.

Method

This was a non-randomized, single-center, retrospective observational study. AF patients received 4-step ablation composed of EIVOM, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation. The primary composite endpoint was defined as recurrence of atrial tachycardia over 30 s. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias.

Results

From April 2020 to May 2022, 362 patients were included, comprising of 182 HF patients and 180 non-HF patients. EIVOM success rate was lower in HF patients than non-HF patients (86.8% vs. 93.9%). Cardiac effusion was more common in HF patients (44.0% vs. 37.2%), and 2 cases of atrial-esophageal fistula were observed in the HF group. During a median follow-up of 12 months, no significant difference in the primary endpoint was observed between HF and non-HF group. Different HF subgroups had similar AF recurrence. After PSM, AF recurrence rate remained statistically equivalent between the HF and non-HF groups.

Conclusion

EVIOM combining catheter ablation can be completed with comparable success rate in AF patients with or without HF. However, peri-procedural safety is a concern for HF patients undergoing EIVOM combing AF catheter ablation. During the follow-up, HF status before ablation is not related with increased AF recurrence.

Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Novel Insights, Challenges, and Treatment Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure frequently co-exist. This review discusses the comorbidity of atrial fibrillation and heart failure, the bi-directional link between them, and the recent advances in the management of these co-existing diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Catheter ablation received a class 1 A recommendation for patients with AF and HF, after overwhelming evidence in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and end-stage heart failure, while clinical trials are still lacking in patients with preserved ejection. Guideline-medical therapy of heart failure decreases the incidence of atrial fibrillation and the progression of atrial myopathy. Based on the current evidence, management of patients with both HF and AF should be include early optimization of comorbidity control, guideline-medical therapy for heart failure, and rhythm control preferentially through catheter ablation in properly selected patients.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: indications and future perspective

Recent advances in techniques, technologies and proven superiority over anti-arrhythmic drugs have made catheter ablation the cornerstone of management for atrial fibrillation (AF), which has shown a steady increase in prevalence in the ageing population worldwide. The aim of therapeutic interventions is to achieve stable sinus rhythm that would improve the quality of life and reduce the risk of AF-associated complications. Pulmonary veins (PVs) were first described as the source of initiation of ectopic triggers driving AF, which led to the establishment of PV isolation (PVI) as the most widely practiced procedure to treat AF. Antral PVI is still recognized as the stand-alone ablation strategy for newly diagnosed paroxysmal AF (PAF). However, in non-PAF patients, PVI seems to be inadequate and several adjunctive strategies, including ablation of left atrial posterior wall and non-PV triggers, AF mapping and ablation of rotors and drivers, ethanol infusion of vein of Marshall and renal denervation, etc. have been reported with mixed results. Recent trials have also documented the benefits of early rhythm control in preventing cardiovascular events in addition to slowing the progression of PAF to more persistent forms. Similarly, very late relapse of the arrhythmia after successful PVI has drawn attention to the critical role of non-PV triggers and highlighted their relevance as potential ablation targets during repeat procedures. Ablation technology is also under constant evolution with the introduction of non-thermal energy sources and new tools to create durable lesions. This review summarizes the indications, advancements, and future perspective of AF ablation.

Effect of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on mental health and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and mental health is well-documented, but the relative benefits of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on mental health and quality of life are not clearly understood. This study assesses the impact of these interventions on AF patients' mental health and quality of life.

METHODS

Through a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy for AF were analyzed. The study focused on a range of outcomes, particularly mental health and quality of life, measured by tools including the SF-36 mental component, HADS, SF-36 physical component, and AFEQT scores, among others. Analyses were stratified by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent) and synthesized using random or fixed-effects models to calculate mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

From 24 RCTs totaling 6,353 patients (51.4% receiving catheter ablation, 71.1% male, average age 59), catheter ablation was found to significantly improve mental health (SMD 0.34; 95% CI 0.05-0.63; p = 0.02) and quality of life as indicated by PCS SF-36 (MD 2.64; 95% CI 1.06-4.26; p < 0.01) and AFEQT scores (MD 6.24; 95% CI 4.43-8.05; p < 0.01), with no significant difference in outcomes between AF subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation offers significant improvements in mental health and quality of life over medical therapy for AF patients, demonstrating its efficacy across different types of AF.

Predictors of systolic function recovery after atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist. AF catheter ablation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but its impact varies between patients. We aimed to identify predictors of LVEF improvement in HF patients with impaired LVEF undergoing AF ablation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study in HF patients with LVEF <50% undergoing AF catheter ablation between May 2016 and May 2022. The primary endpoint was the LVEF recovery rate ('responders'). Secondary endpoints were one-year safety and effectiveness. We also aimed to validate a prediction model for LVEF recovery.

RESULTS

The study included 100 patients (79% male, median age 60 years, 70% with probable tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy [TIC], mean LVEF 37%, 29% with paroxysmal AF). After a median follow-up of 12 months after catheter ablation, LVEF improved significantly (36±10% vs. 53±10%, p<0.001), with an 82% responder rate. A suspected diagnosis of TIC (OR 4.916 [95% CI 1.166-20.732], p=0.030), shorter QRS duration (OR 0.969 [95% CI 0.945-0.994], p=0.015), and smaller left ventricle (OR 0.893 [95% CI 0.799-0.999], p=0.049) were independently associated with LVEF improvement. Freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 86% (64% under antiarrhythmic drugs), and the rate of adverse events was 2%. The prediction model had a good discriminative performance (AUC 0.814 [95% CI 0.681-0.947]).

CONCLUSION

In AF patients with HF and impaired LVEF, suspected TIC, shorter QRS duration, and smaller LV diameter were associated with LVEF recovery following AF catheter ablation.

Sex differences in atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data on the impact of sex on the outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to analyze the association of sex with outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016 to 2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old with heart failure (HF) undergoing AF ablation. The outcomes of interest included peri-procedural complications, in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and unplanned 1-year readmissions. The final cohort was divided into patients with HFrEF and HFpEF and outcomes were compared between males and females in both cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 23,277 patients with HF underwent AF ablation between 2016 and 2019, of which 14,480 had HFrEF and 8,797 had HFpEF. Among patients with HFrEF, 61.6% were males and 38.4% were females whereas, among patients with HFpEF, 35.4% were males and 64.6% were females. On a multivariable-adjusted analysis, in patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality, peri-procedural complications, or 1-year HF-related/AF-related/all-cause readmissions between males and females. In patients with HFpEF, females had a higher risk 1-year HF-related readmissions (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.13-1.87; p = 0.01), without any difference in the 1-year AF-related/all-cause readmissions, in-hospital mortality, or peri-procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that females with HFrEF undergoing AF ablation have similar outcomes whereas females with HFpEF have higher 1-year HF readmissions with no difference in the other outcomes, compared to males.

Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) treated with catheter ablation (CA) vs antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared morbidity and mortality of patients with AF and HFpEF treated with CA vs AAT.

METHODS

AF and HFpEF patients from January 2017 to June 2023 were identified in TriNetX, a large global population-based database. Patients with prior diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or crossover between AAT and CA were excluded. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, type of AF, comorbidities, and cardiovascular medications were compared. The 2 groups were 1:1 propensity score matched for outcomes analysis. All-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack, and acute heart failure were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Patients treated with CA (n = 1959) and AAT (n = 7689) were 1:1 propensity score matched, yielding 3632 patients with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Compared with AAT, CA was associated with decreased mortality (9.2% vs 20.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.431; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.359-0.518; P < .001). In addition, CA was associated with reduced HFpEF (HR, 0.638; 95% CI, 0.550-0.741; P < .001) and acute HFrEF (HR, 0.645; 95% CI, 0.452-0.920; P = .015). There was no difference in composite of cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (HR, 0.935; 95% CI, 0.725-1.207; P = .607).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study of patients with AF and HFpEF, CA was associated with lower mortality and risk of acute heart failure compared with AAT.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Sequencing Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Does It Really Matter?

The conventional sequence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) assumes that the effectiveness and tolerability of GDMT agents mirror their order of discovery, which is not true. In this review, the authors discuss flexible GDMT sequencing that should be permitted in special populations, such as patients with bradycardia, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, the initiation of certain GDMT medications may enable tolerance of other GDMT medications. Most importantly, the achievement of partial doses of all four pillars of GDMT is better than achievement of target dosing of only a couple.

Catheter-based ablation to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Rationale and design of the CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 trial

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in heart failure (HF) and negatively impacts outcomes. The role of ablation-based rhythm control in patients with AF and HF with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is not known. The CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 (CAtheter-Based Ablation of atrial fibrillation compared to conventional treatment in patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial will determine whether early catheter ablation for AF can prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.

METHODS

CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 (NCT05508256) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open, interventional multicentre strategy trial with blinded outcome assessment. Approximately 1548 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF diagnosed within 24 months prior to enrolment and HFpEF or HFmrEF will be randomized to early catheter ablation within 4 weeks after randomization or to usual care. All patients receive anticoagulation, rate control, and HF management according to current guideline recommendations. Usual care can include rhythm control in symptomatic patients. Patients will be followed until the end of the trial for the primary outcome, a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, and total unplanned hospitalizations for HF or acute coronary syndrome. The safety outcome comprises complications of catheter ablation and death. The trial is powered for a rate ratio of 0.75 (two-sided alpha = 0.05, 1-beta = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 will define the role of systematic and early catheter ablation in patients with AF and HFpEF or HFmrEF.

Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation: The Multicenter Randomized BE-ACTION Trial

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is common. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine the impact of increased physical activity on atrial fibrillation recurrence after PVI.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2020, we randomly assigned 200 patients with atrial fibrillation to the ACTION or NO-ACTION group in 4 different centers in the local country of Brandenburg, Germany. Patients were eligible if they were scheduled to undergo PVI, aged ≥50 to ≤77 years, body mass index ≥23 to ≤35 kg/m2, and accepted wearing an activity tracker allowing 24-hour activity monitoring via mobile app. Patients in the ACTION group were actively remote-controlled via transmitted activity data by a physiotherapist, and individual motivational interviewing call sessions were scheduled with each ACTION patient every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the composite of recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia >30 seconds, additional ablation procedure, cardioversion, and new onset of antiarrhythmic drugs earliest after 90 days after index PVI over 12 months.

RESULTS

Overall, the median age of patients was 66 (interquartile range, 61-71) years, 33.5% were women, and 52% had persistent atrial fibrillation. The number of steps per day increased in both groups of patients from baseline to 12 months (P<0.001). The absolute increase in steps per day did not differ between patients in the ACTION group with +3205 steps (597-4944) compared with those in the NO-ACTION group +2423 steps (17-4284), P=0.325. Unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in the primary composite end point in the ACTION group (27.3%) versus the NO-ACTION group (32.7%), P=0.405.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical activity improved in patients after PVI. The present randomized controlled trial shows that activity tracker and motivational calls to increase physical activity versus activity tracker alone did not reduce the occurrence of the primary composite end point of atrial fibrillation recurrence or the absolute increase in steps per day.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.cochranelibrary.com; Unique identifier: DRKS00012914.

Efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The study aims to evaluate whether rhythm control by catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). The literatures were searched by using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to 12 October 2023. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rhythm control using catheter ablation vs. medical therapy in AF patients with HF were pooled. The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, HF re-hospitalization, and stroke, and the secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial tachyarrythmia recurrence, quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, MLHFQ score), 6 min walking distance (6MWD), the level of N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP), and adverse events. Nine RCTs involving in 2293 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation reduced all-cause mortality [10.07% (121/1201) vs. 15.26% (175/1147), risk ratio (RR):0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.74, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%] and the rate of HF re-hospitalization (RR: 0.65, P = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.94, I2 = 74%), but had no obvious difference in incidence of stroke (RR: 0.67, P = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.38, I2 = 0%). Catheter ablation enhanced LVEF [mean difference (MD), 6.26%, P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%], reduced AT recurrence (RR: 0.37, P < 0.00001, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.52, I2 = 89%), improved the quality of life (MLHFQ score) (MD: -6.83, P = 0.003, I2 = 67%), elevated 6MWD (MD: 15.92, P = 0.006, I2 = 76%), and diminished the level NT-proBNP (MD: -44.19, P < 0.00001, I2 = 75%), but had no significant difference in adverse events [25.81% (310/1201) vs. 30.25% (347/1147), RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.01, P = 0.06, I2 = 55%]. Catheter ablation as rhythm control strategy substantially enhances the survival rate, reduces HF re-hospitalization, increases the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance, improves the left ventricular function and the quality of life for AF patients with HF, and has similar safety, compared with medical therapy. The rhythm control by catheter ablation may be a better strategy for the AF patients with HF.