Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting)

Review and Key Takeaways of the 2021 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidelines

The 2021 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention guidelines completed by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions provide a set of guidelines regarding revascularization strategies. With emphasis on equity of care, multidisciplinary heart team use, revascularization for acute coronary syndrome, and stable ischemic heart disease, the guidelines create a thorough framework with recommendations regarding therapeutic strategies. In this comprehensive review, our aim is to summarize the 2021 revascularization guidelines and analyze key points regarding each recommendation.

Intravascular Imaging Predictors Associated With Cardiovascular Events After Complex PCIs

BACKGROUND

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery lesions compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the prognostic impact of suboptimal findings on intravascular imaging such as stent underexpansion, malapposition, or dissection is unclear in the era of contemporary drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

From RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) which compared imaging-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in patients with complex lesions, post-PCI intravascular imaging findings, including minimum stent area (MSA), relative stent underexpansion (MSA≤80% of the average reference lumen area), malapposition, or dissection, were assessed in nonleft main target lesions. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or definite stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

A total of 897 nonleft main lesions from 714 patients undergoing imaging-guided PCI were included. During a median follow-up duration of 2.1 years, the optimal cutoff value of MSA to predict the occurrence of TLF was 5.5 mm2, and MSA<5.5 mm2 was associated with a significantly higher risk of TLF than MSA≥5.5 mm2 (2.2% versus 4.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.01-9.50]; P=0.048). Compared with the reference group (MSA≥5.5 mm2 and no suboptimal findings), the subgroup of patients with MSA≥5.5 mm2 and post-PCI intravascular imaging findings of relative stent underexpansion, major malapposition, or major dissection was associated with a numerically increased risk of TLF (0.0% versus 3.2%; P=0.057). Compared with the same reference group, the subgroup of patients with MSA<5.5 mm2 and suboptimal post-PCI intravascular imaging findings was associated with a significantly increased risk of TLF (0.0% versus 4.7%; P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

After intravascular imaging-guided PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents for nonleft main complex lesions, inadequate absolute stent expansion was independently associated with a higher risk of TLF. Suboptimal post-PCI intravascular imaging findings of relative stent underexpansion, major malapposition, and major dissection seem to contribute to the risk of TLF.

REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.

Management of Stent Underexpansion and Aorto-ostial Lesions

Stent underexpansion (SU) and aorto-ostial lesions (AOL) are challenging conditions commonly faced during clinical practice in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions. Compared to other interventional settings, both SU and AOL are associated with an increased risk of immediate and late events following percutaneous coronary intervention. Several specific strategies including the systematic use of intracoronary imaging and dedicated techniques for lesions' preparation and calcium debulking have been described. This narrative review summarises the currently available options for the diagnosis and treatment of both SU and AOL, highlighting the potential benefits and limits of each technique in these specific settings.

Post-PCI coronary physiology: clinical outcomes and can we optimize?

Invasive coronary physiology is well-established for identifying stable lesions appropriate for revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI is associated with better clinical outcomes compared with routine angiography-guided PCI. The rise of intravascular imaging-guided PCI has generated great interest in optimizing the technical results of a PCI procedure, and this has now extended to an interest in optimizing coronary physiology following PCI. In this review, we examine the relationship between post-PCI physiology and clinical outcomes, including relief from angina, a relationship which is independent of the initial FFR value. In addition, we highlight the utility of pullback coronary pressure assessment for identifying mechanisms of suboptimal final FFR, such as patient characteristics (diffuse atherosclerosis), PCI technique, and certain artifacts in pressure-wire measurements. It is our view that the final FFR value can only be modestly improved, or optimized, with respect to clinical outcomes. The most significant clinical impact is obtained from the change in FFR (ΔFFR) from before to after PCI, which can be anticipated ahead of time by operators and used to guide lesion selection, or exclusion, for PCI.

Outcomes of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided and Angiography-Guided Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

Despite the administration of timely reperfusion treatment, patients with acute myocardial infarction have a high mortality rate and poor prognosis. The potential impact of intraluminal imaging guidance, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), on improving patient outcomes has yet to be conclusively studied. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare OCT-guided primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus angiography-guided for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

This study enrolled 1396 patients with STEMI who underwent PCI, including 553 patients who underwent OCT-guided PCI and 843 patients who underwent angiography-guided PCI. The clinical outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, admission due to heart failure, stroke, and unplanned revascularization at the 4-year follow-up.

Results

The prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events in OCT-guided group was not significantly lower compared to those without OCT guidance after adjustment (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.582; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.300-1.924; p < 0.001; adjusted HR, 1.095; adjusted 95% CI, 0.883-1.358; p = 0.409). The prevalence of cardiovascular death was significantly lower in patients with OCT guidance compared to those without before and after adjustment (unadjusted HR, 3.303; 95% CI, 2.142-5.093; p < 0.001; adjusted HR, 2.025; adjusted 95% CI, 1.225-3.136; p = 0.004).

Conclusions

OCT-guided primary PCI used to treat STEMI was associated with reduced long-term cardiovascular death.

Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter

3DStent is a novel rotational angiography imaging capable of 3D reconstruction and measuring stent area and diameter, without need for intravascular imaging. To compare 3DStent and OCT-derived stent area and diameter after PCI. Patients with de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a single DES and evaluated by OCT and 3DStent were included. Stent area and diameter were measured by 3DStent, at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side and by OCT. From September 2023 to February 2024 six coronary lesions were analyzed. Post-PCI stent area measured by OCT was (mean ± standard deviation) 7.03 ± 2.85 mm2 and by 3DStent 9.41 ± 2.79 mm2, 7.21 ± 2.23 mm2 and 5.63 ± 1.83 mm2 at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Stent diameter by OCT was 2.93 ± 0.58 mm, and by 3DStent 3.27 ± 0.50 mm, 2.86 ± 0.49 mm and 2.52 ± 0.45 mm at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Significant correlation was observed between OCT and 3DStent in relation to stent area (Exp(B) 3.35, mean of difference 0.19 ± 1.01 mm2, 95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm2, p < 0.001) and diameter (Exp(B) 3.18, mean difference - 0.07 ± 0.18 mm, 95%CI -0.43-0.30 mm, p < 0.001), particularly when 3DStent measurements performed at the mid side. Very high reproducibility was demonstrated by intra- and inter-observer analysis (r = 0.92 and r = 0.93 respectively). 3DStent appears to be an easy and reproducible tool to assess post-PCI stent area and diameter as compared to OCT.

Impact of Stenting Long Lesions on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease: Data From the BIOVASC Trial

An increased total stent length (TSL) might be associated with a higher risk of clinical events; however, in patients with multivessel disease (MVD), a considerable TSL is often required. In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and MVD, immediate complete revascularization was associated with shorter TSL in the BIOVASC (Immediate versus staged complete revascularisation in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary disease) Trial. This is a subanalysis of the BIOVASC trial comparing clinical outcomes in patients with either <60 or ≥60 mm TSL. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, any unplanned ischemia driven revascularization, or cerebrovascular events at 2 years after the index procedure. A total of 1,525 patients were enrolled in the BIOVASC trial, of whom 855 had a TSL of ≥60 mm (long TSL). No significant difference was established when comparing patients treated with either long or short TSL in terms of the primary outcome at 2-year follow-up, which occurred in 117 patients (13.7%) in the ≥60 mm group and 69 patients (10.3%) in the <60 mm group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.69, p = 0.16). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the secondary end points. In conclusion, in patients with acute coronary syndrome and MVD, long stenting did not show a significant difference in clinical event rate compared with short stenting.

Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Intravascular Imaging: From Pathophysiology to Improving Outcomes

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents the most severe manifestation of coronary artery disease. Intravascular imaging, both intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have played crucial roles for the impressive reduction in mortality of ACS. Intravascular imaging is useful for the detection of atherosclerotic mechanism (plaque rupture, calcified nodules, or plaque erosions) and for the evaluation of nonatherosclerotic and nonobstructive types of ACS. In addition, IVUS and OCT play a crucial role in the optimization of the PCI. The aim of the current review is to present the role of intravascular imaging in identifying the mechanisms of ACS and its prognostic role in future events, to review the current guidelines suggesting intravascular imaging use in ACS, to summarize its role in PCI in patients with ACS, and to compare IVUS and OCT.

Contemporary Functional Coronary Angiography: An Update

Functional coronary angiography (FCA) is a novel modality for assessing the physiology of coronary lesions, going beyond anatomical visualization by traditional coronary angiography. FCA incorporates indices like fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR), which utilize pressure measurements across coronary stenoses to evaluate hemodynamic impacts and to guide revascularization strategies. In this review, we present traditional and evolving modalities and uses of FCA. We will also evaluate the existing evidence and discuss the applicability of FCA in various clinical scenarios. Finally, we provide insight into emerging evidence, current challenges, and future directions in FCA.

Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been most commonly guided by coronary angiography. However, to overcome the inherent limitations of conventional coronary angiography, there has been an increasing interest in the adjunctive tools of intracoronary imaging for PCI guidance. Recently, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has garnered substantial attention as a valid intravascular imaging modality for guiding PCI. However, despite the unparalleled high-resolution imaging capability of OCT, which offers detailed anatomical information on coronary lesion morphology and PCI optimisation, its broad application in routine PCI practice remains limited. Several factors may have curtailed the widespread adoption of OCT-guided PCI in daily practice, including the transitional challenge from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the experienced skill required for image acquisition and interpretation, the lack of a uniform algorithm for OCT-guided PCI optimisation, and the limited clinical evidence. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of OCT-guided PCI, involving the technical aspects, optimal strategies for OCT-guided PCI, and the wide application of OCT-guided PCI in various anatomical subsets. Special attention is given to the latest clinical evidence from recent randomised clinical trials with respect to OCT-guided PCI.

CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 2024

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has significantly contributed to reducing the mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) even in cardiogenic shock and is now the standard of care in most of Japanese institutions. The Task Force on Primary PCI of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) proposed an expert consensus document for the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) focusing on procedural aspects of primary PCI in 2018 and updated in 2022. Recently, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published the guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in 2023. Major new updates in the 2023 ESC guideline include: (1) intravascular imaging should be considered to guide PCI (Class IIa); (2) timing of complete revascularization; (3) antiplatelet therapy in patient with high-bleeding risk. Reflecting rapid advances in the field, the Task Force on Primary PCI of the CVIT group has now proposed an updated expert consensus document for the management of ACS focusing on procedural aspects of primary PCI in 2024 version.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis

Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are alternative techniques to angiography-guided (ANG-g) PCI in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), especially for optimal stent deployment in coronary arteries. We conducted a network meta-analysis including studies comparing those three techniques. We searched databases for studies that compared IVUS, OCT, and ANG-g PCI in patients with CAD. Overall, 52 studies with 231,137 patients were included in this meta-analysis. ANG-g PCI had higher major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST) than IVUS-guided PCI. Of note, both OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI had similar outcomes. The frequency of MACEs, cardiac death, and MI were higher in ANG-g PCI than in OCT-guided PCI. The highest benefit was established with OCT for MACEs (P-score=.973), MI (P-score=.823), and cardiac death (P-score=.921) and with IVUS for all-cause death (P-score=.792), TLR (P -score=.865), and ST (P-score=.930). This network meta-analysis indicated that using OCT or IVUS for optimal stent implantation provides better outcomes in comparison with ANG-g in patients with CAD undergoing PCI.

Safety, efficacy, and optical coherence tomography insights into intravascular lithotripsy for the modification of non-eruptive calcified nodules: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Non-eruptive calcium nodules (CNs) are commonly seen in heavily calcified coronary artery disease. They are the most difficult subset for modification, and may result in stent damage, malapposition and under-expansion. There are only limited options available for non-eruptive CN modification. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is being explored as a potentially safe and effective modality in these lesions.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the use of IVL for the modification of non-eruptive CNs. The study also explored the OCT features of calcium nodule modification by IVL.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, observational study in which patients with angiographic heavy calcification and non-eruptive CN on OCT and undergoing PCI were enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from perforation, no-reflow/slow flow, flow-limiting dissection after IVL therapy, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalization and at 30 days. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The primary efficacy endpoint was procedural success, defined as residual diameter stenosis of <30% on angiography and stent expansion of more than 80% as assessed by OCT.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients with 54 non-eruptive CNs undergoing PCI were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before IVL, OCT revealed a mean calcium score of 3.7 ± 0.5 and a mean MLA at CN of 3.9 ± 2.1 mm2. Following IVL, OCT revealed calcium fractures in 40 out of 54 (74.1%) CNs with an average of 1.05 ± 0.72 fractures per CN. Fractures were predominantly observed at the base of the CN (80%). Post IVL, the mean MLA at CN increased to 4.9 ± 2.3 mm2. After PCI, the mean MSA at the CN was 7.9 ± 2.5 mm2. Optimal stent expansion (stent expansion >80%) at the CN was achieved in 85.71% of patients. All patients remained free from MACE during hospitalization and at the 30-day follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, all-cause death had occurred in 3 (14.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-arm study demonstrated the safety, efficacy, and utility of the IVL in a subset of patients with non-eruptive calcified nodules. In this study, minimal procedural complications, excellent lesion modifications, and favorable 30-day and 1-year outcomes were observed.

Optical Coherence Tomography in Myocardial Infarction Management: Enhancing Precision in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

In acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the urgency of coronary revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is paramount, offering notable advantages over pharmacologic treatment. However, the persistent risk of adverse events, including recurrent AMI and heart failure post-revascularization, underscores the necessity for enhanced strategies in managing coronary artery disease. Traditional angiography, while widely employed, presents significant limitations by providing only two-dimensional representations of complex three-dimensional vascular structures, hampering the accurate assessment of plaque characteristics and stenosis severity. Intravascular imaging, specifically optical coherence tomography (OCT), significantly addresses these limitations with superior spatial resolution compared to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Within the context of AMI, OCT serves dual purposes: as a diagnostic tool to accurately identify culprit lesions in ambiguous cases and as a guide for optimizing PCI procedures. Its capacity to differentiate between various mechanisms of acute coronary syndrome, such as plaque rupture and spontaneous coronary dissection, enhances its diagnostic potential. Furthermore, OCT facilitates precise lesion preparation, optimal stent sizing, and confirms stent deployment efficacy. Recent meta-analyses indicate that OCT-guided PCI markedly improves safety and efficacy in revascularization, subsequently decreasing the risks of mortality and complications. This review emphasizes the critical role of OCT in refining patient-specific therapeutic approaches, aligning with the principles of precision medicine to enhance clinical outcomes for individuals experiencing AMI.

Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become one of the most commonly performed interventional life-saving procedures worldwide. Intravascular Imaging (intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)) have initially evolved to guide PCI compared with angiography. However, this technology is not universally employed in all PCI procedures, and there is ongoing controversy regarding its additional benefits to patient outcomes. We aim to estimate the efficacy and safety of imaging modalities during PCI, allowing pre-, per, and post-intervention assessment of coronary vascularization.

METHODS

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved from PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL through September 2023. We used R, version 4.2.0. Effect sizes will be presented as odds ratios with accompanying 95% credible intervals.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42024507821.

RESULTS

Our study, encompassing 36 RCTs with a total of 17,572 patients, revelead that compared to conventional angiography, IVUS significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR: 0.71 [95% CrI: 0.56 to 0.87]) but not OCT (OR: 0.91 [95% CrI: 0.62 to 1.39]), IVUS and OCT significantly reduced the risk of cardiac death (OR: 0.50 [95% CrI: 0.33 to 0.76]) and (OR: 0.55 [95% CrI: 0.31 to 0.98]), respectively, IVUS significantly reduced the risk of target vessel-related revascularization (OR: 0.60 [95% CrI: 0.48 to 0.75]) but not OCT (OR: 0.86 [95% CrI: 0.60 to 1.19]), IVUS and OCT significantly reduced the risk of stent thrombosis (OR: 0.50 [95% CrI: 0.28 to 0.92]) and (OR: 0.48 [95% CrI: 0.22 to 0.98]), respectively, IVUS significantly reduced the risk of re-stenosis (OR: 0.65 [95% CrI: 0.46 to 0.88]) but not OCT (OR: 0.55 [95% CrI: 0.15 to 1.99]), neither IVUS (OR: 0.97 [95% CrI: 0.71 to 1.38]) nor OCT (OR: 0.75 [95% CrI: 0.49 to 1.22]) were associated with statistically significant reductions in all-cause mortality, neither IVUS (OR: 0.70 [95% CrI: 0.45 to 1.32]) nor OCT (OR: 0.81 [95% CrI: 0.47 to 1.59]) were associated with statistically significant reductions in target vessel failure, neither IVUS (OR: 0.88 [95% CrI: 0.43 to 2.44]) nor OCT (OR: 0.81 [95% CrI: 0.37 to 2.04]) were associated with statistically significant reductions in target lesion failure, and neither IVUS (OR: 0.82 [95% CrI: 0.60 to 1.06]) nor OCT (OR: 0.84 [95% CrI: 0.59 to 1.19]) were associated with statistically significant reductions in myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

Intravascular imaging-guided, including IVUS and OCT, improved the postinterventional outcomes of PCI, notably suggesting their advantage over traditional angiography with no significant difference between IVUS and OCT.

Widespread Use of Imaging-Guided PCI in Asia: Time for Extended Application

In recent years, a wealth of clinical data has emerged regarding intravascular imaging involving either intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography. This surge in data has propelled the adoption of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in daily clinical practice. The findings of current randomized clinical trials regarding imaging guidance have lent strong support to the benefits of intravascular imaging-guided PCI. This holds especially true for the diagnosis and treatment of complex lesions, such as left main disease, diffuse long lesions, chronic total occlusion, severely calcified lesions, bifurcations, and in-stent restenosis, as well as in high-risk patients such as those with acute myocardial infarction or chronic kidney disease. During intravascular imaging-guided PCI, operators attempt to achieve stent optimization for maximized benefits of imaging guidance. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the updated clinical data of intravascular imaging-guided PCI and intravascular ultrasound/optical coherence tomography-derived stent optimization criteria.

Comparison of angiography-guided vs. intra-vascular imaging-guiding percutaneous coronary intervention of acute myocardial infarction: a real world clinical practice

Background

The role of routine intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of PCI guided by different imaging modalities in AMI patients.

Materials and methods

Data from AMI patients who had undergone PCI between 2012 and 2022 were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 12.9 ± 1.73 months. The imaging modality-either intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or angiography alone-was selected at the operator's discretion. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization.

Results

Of the 1,304 PCIs performed, 47.5% (n = 620) were guided by angiography alone, 37.0% (n = 483) by IVUS, and 15.4% (n = 201) by OCT. PCI guided by intravascular imaging modalities was associated with lower 1-year rates of MI (1.3%, P = 0.001) and MACE (5.2%, P = 0.036). OCT-guided PCI was linked to lower rates of 1-year CV death (IVUS vs. OCT: 6.2% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.016) and MACE (IVUS vs. OCT: 6.4% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.032). Intravascular imaging modalities and diabetes were identified as predictors of better and worse 1-year MACE outcomes, respectively.

Conclusion

PCI guided by intravascular imaging modalities resulted in improved 1-year clinical outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI alone in AMI patients. OCT-guided PCI was associated with lower 1-year MACE rates compared to IVUS-guided PCI. Therefore, intravascular imaging should be recommended for PCI in AMI, with OCT being particularly considered when appropriate.

Polydiolcitrate-MoS2 Composite for 3D Printing Radio-Opaque, Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Implantable polymeric biodegradable devices, such as biodegradable vascular scaffolds, cannot be fully visualized using standard X-ray-based techniques, compromising their performance due to malposition after deployment. To address this challenge, we describe a new radiopaque and photocurable liquid polymer-ceramic composite (mPDC-MoS2) consisting of methacrylated poly(1,12 dodecamethylene citrate) (mPDC) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets. The composite was used as an ink with microcontinuous liquid interface production (μCLIP) to fabricate bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). Prints exhibited excellent crimping and expansion mechanics without strut failures and, importantly, with X-ray visibility in air and muscle tissue. Notably, MoS2 nanosheets displayed physical degradation over time in phosphate-buffered saline solution, suggesting the potential for producing radiopaque, fully bioresorbable devices. mPDC-MoS2 is a promising bioresorbable X-ray-visible composite material suitable for 3D printing medical devices, such as vascular scaffolds, that require noninvasive X-ray-based monitoring techniques for implantation and evaluation. This innovative biomaterial composite system holds significant promise for the development of biocompatible, fluoroscopically visible medical implants, potentially enhancing patient outcomes and reducing medical complications.

Five-year follow-up of OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance, there is limited evidence for optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

AIMS

We investigated the role of OCT in guiding a reperfusion strategy and improving the long-term prognosis of STEMI patients.

METHODS

All patients who were diagnosed with STEMI and who underwent pPCI between January 2017 and December 2020 were enrolled and divided into OCT-guided versus angiography-guided cohorts. They had routine follow-up for up to 5 years or until the time of the last known contact. All-cause death and cardiovascular death were designated as the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 3,897 patients were enrolled: 2,696 (69.2%) with OCT guidance and 1,201 (30.8%) with angiographic guidance. Patients in the OCT-guided cohort were less often treated with stenting during pPCI (62.6% vs 80.2%; p<0.001). The 5-year cumulative rates of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in the OCT-guided cohort were 10.4% and 8.0%, respectively, significantly lower than in the angiography-guided cohort (19.0% and 14.1%; both log-rank p<0.001). All 4 multivariate models showed that OCT guidance could significantly reduce 5-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] in model 4: 0.689, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.551-0.862) and cardiovascular mortality (HR in model 4: 0.692, 95% CI: 0.536-0.895). After propensity score matching, the benefits of OCT guidance were consistent in terms of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.548-0.913) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.709, 95% CI: 0.526-0.955).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with angiography alone, OCT guidance may change reperfusion strategies and lead to better long-term survival in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. Findings in the current observational study should be further corroborated in randomised trials.

Optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields clinical outcomes comparable to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, there is a scarcity of data comparing the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for patients with AMI in the era of second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES).

METHODS

We identified 5260 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with a second-generation DES for AMI under IVUS or OCT guidance from pooled data derived from a series of Korean AMI registries between 2011 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 535 (10.2%) and 4725 (89.8%) patients were treated under OCT and IVUS guidance, respectively. The 1-year target lesion failure rates were comparable between the OCT and IVUS groups before and after propensity score matching (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.42-2.05, P=.84). The OCT utilization rate did not exceed 5% of total patients treated with second-generation DES implantation during the study period. The primary factors for the selection of OCT over IVUS were the absence of chronic kidney disease, non-left main vessel disease, single-vessel disease, stent diameter <3mm, and stent length ≤ 25mm.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT-guided PCI in patients with AMI treated with a second-generation DES provided comparable clinical outcomes for 1-year target lesion failure compared with IVUS-guided PCI.

Innovations in Intracoronary Imaging: Present Clinical Practices and Future Outlooks

Engaging intracoronary imaging (IC) techniques such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography enables the precise description of vessel architecture. These imaging modalities have well-established roles in providing guidance and optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. Furthermore, IC is increasingly recognized for its diagnostic capabilities, as it has the unique capacity to reveal vessel wall characteristics that may not be apparent through angiography alone. This manuscript thoroughly reviews the contemporary landscape of IC in clinical practice. Focused on current methodologies, the review explores the utility and advancements in IC techniques. Emphasizing their role in clarifying coronary pathophysiology, guiding PCI, and optimizing patient outcomes, the manuscript critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of each modality. Additionally, the integration of IC into routine clinical workflows and its impact on decision-making processes are discussed. By synthesizing the latest evidence, this review provides valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals involved in the dynamic field of interventional cardiology.

Application of optical coherence tomography in cardiovascular diseases: bibliometric and meta-analysis

Significance

Since the advent of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) two decades ago, there has been substantial advancement in our understanding of intravascular biology. Identifying culprit lesion pathology through OCT could precipitate a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Given the technical prowess of OCT in the realm of cardiology, bibliometric analysis can reveal trends and research focal points in the application of OCT for cardiovascular diseases. Concurrently, meta-analyses provide a more comprehensive evidentiary base, supporting the clinical efficacy of OCT-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).

Design

This study employs a dual approach of Bibliometric and Meta-analysis.

Methods

Relevant literature from 2003 to 2023 was extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R for publication patterns, countries, institutions, authors, and research hotspots. The study compares OCT-guided and coronary angiography-guided PCI in treating adult coronary artery disease through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The study has been reported in the line with PRISMA and AMSTAR Guidelines.

Results

Adhering to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 publications were incorporated, demonstrating a continual rise in annual output. Chinese researchers contributed the most studies, while American research wielded greater influence. Analysis of trends indicated that research on OCT and angiography-guided PCI has become a focal topic in recent cohort studies and RCTs. In 11 RCTs (n = 5,277), OCT-guided PCI was not significantly associated with a reduction in the risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.10), cardiac death (0.61, 0.36-1.02), all-cause death (0.7, 0.49-1.02), myocardial infarction (MI) (0.88, 0.69-1.13), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (0.94, 0.7-1.27), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (1.04, 0.76-1.43), or stent thrombosis (0.72, 0.38-1.38). However, in 7 observational studies (n = 4,514), OCT-guided PCI was associated with a reduced risk of MACE (0.66, 0.48-0.91) and TLR (0.39, 0.22-0.68).

Conclusion

Our comprehensive review of OCT in cardiovascular disease literature from 2004 to 2023, encompassing country and institutional origins, authors, and publishing journals, suggests that OCT-guided PCI does not demonstrate significant clinical benefits in RCTs. Nevertheless, pooled results from observational studies indicate a reduction in MACE and TLR.

Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is standard of care in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) suitable for interventional revascularization. Intracoronary imaging by optical coherence tomography (OCT) expanded treatment approaches adding diagnostic information and contributing to stent optimization.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of OCT-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI in treatment of ACS.

METHODS

A structured literature search was performed. All controlled trials evaluating OCT-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI in patients with ACS were eligible. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

Eight studies enrolling 2612 patients with ACS were eligible. 1263 patients underwent OCT-guided and 1,349 patients angiography-guided PCI. OCT guidance was associated with a 30% lower likelihood of MACE (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.93, p = 0.01, I2 = 1%). OCT-guided PCI was also associated with significantly decreased cardiac mortality (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.96, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). There was no detectable difference in all-cause mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.51-2.31, p = 0.83, I2 = 0). Patients in OCT-guided group less frequently required target lesion revascularization (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). Analysis of myocardial infarction did not result in significant treatment differences. In subgroup or sensitivity analysis the observed advantages of OCT-guided PCI were not replicable.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that PCI guidance with OCT in ACS decreases MACE, cardiac death and target lesion revascularization compared to angiography. On individual study level, in subgroup or sensitivity analyses these advantages were not thoroughly replicable.

Investigations of injection strategies to use heparinized normal saline instead of contrast media for intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging

BACKGROUND

The benefits of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are well established. Intravascular imaging guidance improves short- and long-term outcomes, especially in complex PCI. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has a higher resolution than intravascular ultrasound. However, the usage of OCT is mainly limited by the need to use contrast for flushing injections, which increases the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with underlying chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to prove that flushing techniques with normal saline instead of contrast can be used in OCT imaging and can generate high-quality images.

METHODS

This prospective single-center observational study included patients with indications for OCT-guided PCI. For OCT pullbacks, heparinized saline was injected by an automatic pump injector at different rates, and additional extension catheters for selective coronary artery engagement were used at the operator's discretion. Recordings were made using the Ilumien Optis OCT system (Abbott) and the Dragonfly (Abbott) catheter and were analyzed at 1-mm intervals by two operators. Pullbacks were categorized as having optimal, acceptable, or unacceptable imaging quality. A clinically usable run was determined if >75% of the region of interest length was described as having optimal or acceptable imaging quality.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were enrolled in the study; 47 different lesions were assessed before and after PCI. In total, 91.5% of runs were described as clinically suitable for use.

CONCLUSION

Heparinized saline injections for OCT imaging are effective in generating good-quality OCT images suitable for clinical use.

Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), a high-resolution imaging modality, guides stent implantation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, OCT-guided PCI safety and efficacy data is limited.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OCT-guided PCI to Angiography-guided PCI from inception to August 2023. A random-effects model was used to pool risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical endpoints.

Results

Our analysis included 5,139 patients from 11 studies. OCT-guided PCI resulted in a higher minimum stent area (MD = 0.35 [95 % CI, 0.21-0.49]; p < 0.00001), significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.56 [95 % CI, = 0.32-0.99]; p = 0.04), stent thrombosis (RR = 0.56 [95 % CI, 0.32-0.96]; p = 0.04), stent malapposition RR = 0.79 [95 % CI, 0.71-0.88]; p = < 0.0001) and major edge dissection (RR = 0.47 [95 % CI, 0.34-0.65]; p = <0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality (RR = 0.71; p = 0.06), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [RR = 0.80; p = 0.10], myocardial infarction (MI) [RR = 0.84; p = 0.16], target lesion revascularization (TLR) [RR = 0.94; p = 0.68], and target vessel revascularization (TVR) [RR = 0.91; p = 0.52].

Conclusion

OCT-guided PCI led to an increased MSA and decreased cardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, stent malapposition, and major edge dissection. The incidence of all-cause mortality, MACE, MI, TLR, and TVR remained comparable across the two groups.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) - versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve procedural outcomes. However, evidence supporting its superiority over angiography-guided PCI in terms of clinical outcomes is still emerging and limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of OCT-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided and angiography-guided PCI in patients with CAD. Clinical endpoints including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs, comprising 2,699 patients in the OCT-guided group and 2,968 patients in the angiography-guided group met inclusion criteria. OCT-guided PCI was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiovascular death(RR 0.56; 95%CI: 0.32-0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis(RR 0.56; 95%CI: 0.33-0.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%), and MACE (RR 0.79; 95%CI: 0.66-0.95; p = 0.01; I2 = 5%). The incidence of all-cause death (RR 0.71; 95%CI: 0.49-1.02; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (RR 0.86; 95%CI: 0.67-1.10; p = 0.22; I2 = 0%) and TLR (RR 0.98; 95%CI: 0.73-1.33; p = 0.91; I2 = 0%) was non-significantly lower in the OCT-guided group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing PCI, OCT-guided PCI was associated with lower incidences of cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis and MACE compared to angiography-guided PCI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023484342.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes (IVUS-ACS): a two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to result in superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. However, insufficient data are available concerning the advantages of intravascular ultrasound guidance for patients with an acute coronary syndrome. This trial aimed to investigate whether the use of intravascular ultrasound guidance, as compared with angiography guidance, improves the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

In this two-stage, multicentre, randomised trial, patients aged 18 years or older and presenting with an acute coronary syndrome at 58 centres in China, Italy, Pakistan, and the UK were randomly assigned to intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients, follow-up health-care providers, and assessors were masked to random assignment; however, staff in the catheterisation laboratory were not. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation at 1 year after randomisation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03971500, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 20, 2019 and Oct 27, 2022, 3505 patients with an acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1753) or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1752). 1-year follow-up was completed in 3504 (>99·9%) patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 70 patients in the intravascular ultrasound group and 128 patients in the angiography group (Kaplan-Meier rate 4·0% vs 7·3%; hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·74]; p=0·0001), driven by reductions in target vessel myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation. There were no significant differences in all-cause death or stent thrombosis between groups. Safety endpoints were also similar in the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with an acute coronary syndrome, intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of contemporary drug-eluting stents resulted in a lower 1-year rate of the composite outcome of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven revascularisation compared with angiography guidance alone.

FUNDING

The Chinese Society of Cardiology, the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China, and Jiangsu Provincial & Nanjing Municipal Clinical Trial Project.

TRANSLATION

For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Three-Year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions

BACKGROUND

The FORZA trial (FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty) prospectively compared the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) for treatment decisions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Murray law-based quantitative-flow-ratio (μQFR) is a novel noninvasive method for the computation of FFR. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical impact of μQFR, FFR, or OCT guidance in FORZA trial lesions at 3-year follow-up.

METHODS

μQFR was assessed at baseline and, in the case of a decision to intervene, after (FFR- or OCT-guided) PCI. The baseline μQFR was considered the final μQFR for deferred lesions, and post-PCI μQFR value was taken as final for stented lesions. The primary end point was target vessel failure ([TVF]; cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target-vessel-revascularization) at a 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 419 vessels (199 OCT-guided and 220 FFR-guided) were included in the FORZA trial. μQFR was evaluated in 256 deferred lesions and 159 treated lesions (98 OCT-guided PCI and 61 FFR-guided PCI). In treated lesions, post-PCI μQFR was higher in OCT-group compared with FFR-group (median, 0.93 versus 0.91; P=0.023), and the post-PCI μQFR improvement was greater in FFR-group (0.14 versus 0.08; P<0.0001). At 3-year follow-up, OCT- and FFR-guided treatment decisions resulted in comparable TVF rate (6.7% versus 7.9%; P=0.617). Final μQFR was the only predictor of TVF. μQFR ≤0.89 was associated with 3× increase in TVF (11.6% versus 3.7%; P=0.004). PCI was a predictor of higher final μQFR (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.14-0.34]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In vessels with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, OCT-guided PCI resulted in comparable clinical outcomes as FFR-guided PCI. μQFR estimated at the end of diagnostic or interventional procedure predicted 3-year TVF.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01824030.

Prognostic Value of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve After Imaging-Guided Optimal Stenting

BACKGROUND

Prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains uncertain in patients undergoing an imaging-guided optimal stenting strategy.

OBJECTIVES

The authors evaluated the prognostic value of poststenting FFR according to the intracoronary imaging-guided lesion preparation, stent sizing, and postdilation (iPSP) strategy to optimize stent outcomes.

METHODS

Poststenting FFR assessment was performed in 1,108 lesions in 1,005 patients from the IRIS-FFR registry. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 5 years.

RESULTS

At the index procedure, 326 lesions (29.4%) were treated using all 3 parts of the iPSP strategy. In the overall population, poststenting FFR was significantly associated with the risk of TVF at 5 years (per 0.01 increase of FFR, adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.98; P = 0.004). Significant interaction was detected between poststenting FFR and the iPSP strategy on the risk of TVF at 5 years (P = 0.045 for interaction). In the iPSP group, poststenting FFR was not associated with the risk of TVF at 5 years (per 0.01 increase of FFR, aHR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.96-1.05; P = 0.95), whereas a significant association between poststenting FFR and TVF at 5 years was observed in the no iPSP group (per 0.01 increase of FFR, aHR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.99; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Poststenting FFR showed a significant association with cardiac events. However, its prognostic value appeared to be limited after the application of an imaging-guided optimal stenting strategy.

Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Results from multiple randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-guided PCI as well as a pivotal trial comparing the 2 intravascular imaging (IVI) techniques have provided mixed results.

METHODS

Major electronic databases were searched to identify eligible trials evaluating at least 2 PCI guidance strategies among ICA, IVUS, and OCT. The 2 coprimary outcomes were target lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes included ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, death, cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted. The results were replicated by Bayesian random-effects models. Pairwise meta-analyses of the direct components, multiple sensitivity analyses, and pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA were supplemented.

RESULTS

The results from 24 randomized trials (15 489 patients: IVUS versus ICA, 46.4%, 7189 patients; OCT versus ICA, 32.1%, 4976 patients; OCT versus IVUS, 21.4%, 3324 patients) were included in the network meta-analyses. IVUS was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization compared with ICA (odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.54-0.87]), whereas no significant differences were observed between OCT and ICA (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63-1.09]) and OCT and IVUS (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.88-1.66]). Myocardial infarction did not significantly differ between guidance strategies (IVUS versus ICA: OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.70-1.19]; OCT versus ICA: OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.68-1.11]; OCT versus IVUS: OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.69-1.33]). These results were consistent with the secondary outcomes of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, and sensitivity analyses generally did not reveal inconsistency. OCT was associated with a significant reduction of stent thrombosis compared with ICA (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26-0.92]) but only in the frequentist analysis. Similarly, the results in terms of survival between IVUS or OCT and ICA were uncertain across analyses. A total of 25 randomized trials (17 128 patients) were included in the pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA where IVI guidance was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization, cardiac death, and stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

IVI-guided PCI was associated with a reduction in ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization compared with ICA-guided PCI, with the difference most evident for IVUS. In contrast, no significant differences in myocardial infarction were observed between guidance strategies.

Optical Coherence Tomography Measures Predicting Fractional Flow Reserve: The OMEF Study

Background

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows to carefully characterize coronary plaque morphology and lumen dimensions. We sought to evaluate the value of OCT in predicting fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Methods

We performed a multicenter, international, pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from published studies assessing FFR and OCT on the same vessel. Data from stable or unstable patients who underwent both FFR and OCT of the same coronary artery were collected through a dedicated database. Predefined OCT parameters were minimum lumen area (MLA), percentage area stenosis (%AS), and presence of thrombus or plaque rupture. Primary end point was FFR ≤0.80. Secondary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients not undergoing revascularization based on negative FFR (>0.80).

Results

A total of 502 coronary lesions in 489 patients were included. A significant correlation was observed between OCT-MLA and FFR values (R = 0.525; P < .001), and between OCT-%AS and FFR values (R = -0.482; P < .001). In Receiver operating characteristic analysis, MLA <2.0 mm2 showed a good discriminative power to predict an FFR ≤0.80 (AUC, 0.80), whereas %AS >73% showed a moderate discriminative power (AUC, 0.73). When considering proximal coronary segments, the best OCT cutoff values predicting an FFR ≤0.80 were MLA <3.1 mm2 (AUC, 0.82), and %AS >61% (AUC, 0.84). In patients with a negative FFR not revascularized, the combination of lower MLA and higher %AS had a trend toward worse outcome (which was statistically significant in the analysis restricted to proximal vessels).

Conclusions

OCT lumen measures (MLA, %AS) may predict FFR, and different cutoffs are needed for proximal vessels.

Artificial Intelligence for the Interventional Cardiologist: Powering and Enabling OCT Image Interpretation

Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) is a form of intra-coronary imaging that uses near-infrared light to generate high-resolution, cross-sectional, and 3D volumetric images of the vessel. Given its high spatial resolution, IVOCT is well-placed to characterise coronary plaques and aid with decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention. IVOCT requires significant interpretation skills, which themselves require extensive education and training for effective utilisation, and this would appear to be the biggest barrier to its widespread adoption. Various artificial intelligence-based tools have been utilised in the most contemporary clinical IVOCT systems to facilitate better human interaction, interpretation and decision-making. The purpose of this article is to review the existing and future technological developments in IVOCT and demonstrate how they could aid the operator.

Intravascular imaging-guided coronary drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses have shown reduced risks of composite adverse events with intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography guidance alone. However, these studies have been insufficiently powered to show whether all-cause death or all myocardial infarction are reduced with intravascular imaging guidance, and most previous intravascular imaging studies were done with intravascular ultrasound rather than optical coherence tomography (OCT), a newer imaging modality. We aimed to assess the comparative performance of intravascular imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI with drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

For this systematic review and updated meta-analysis, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to Aug 30, 2023, for studies that randomly assigned patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents either to intravascular ultrasound or OCT, or both, or to angiography alone to guide the intervention. The searches were done and study-level data were extracted independently by two investigators. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or target lesion revascularisation, assessed in patients randomly assigned to intravascular imaging guidance (intravascular ultrasound or OCT) versus angiography guidance. We did a standard frequentist meta-analysis to generate direct data, and a network meta-analysis to generate indirect data and overall treatment effects. Outcomes were expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs at the longest reported follow-up duration. This study was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, number CRD42023455662).

FINDINGS

22 trials were identified in which 15 964 patients were randomised and followed for a weighted mean duration of 24·7 months (longest duration of follow-up in each study ranging from 6 to 60 months). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI resulted in a decreased risk of target lesion failure (RR 0·71 [95% CI 0·63-0·80]; p<0·0001), driven by reductions in the risks of cardiac death (RR 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·75]; p=0·0001), TV-MI (RR 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-0·98]; p=0·030), and target lesion revascularisation (RR 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·86]; p=0·0002). Intravascular imaging guidance also reduced the risks of stent thrombosis (RR 0·52 [95% CI 0·34-0·81]; p=0·0036), all myocardial infarction (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·71-0·99]; p=0·033), and all-cause death (RR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93]; p=0·0091). Outcomes were similar for OCT-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with angiography guidance, intravascular imaging guidance of coronary stent implantation with OCT or intravascular ultrasound enhances both the safety and effectiveness of PCI, reducing the risks of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation, and stent thrombosis.

FUNDING

Abbott.

The use of mechanical circulatory support in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a literature-based review

Contemporary medical practices allow complete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a considerable number of patients who previously would have been considered too 'high-risk' for such procedures. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices during these high-risk PCIs (HR-PCIs) is thought to reduce the potential risk for major adverse events during and after revascularization. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO), and the Impella are the most common MCS devices in use. This review aims to summarize the clinical evidence for each of these devices and the potential mechanisms for the improvement in patient outcomes in HR-PCI. The IABP use has rapidly declined in recent years due to no evidence of benefit in HR-PCI and cardiogenic shock. The V-A ECMO results in low rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) but higher rates of acute kidney injury and increased need for transfusions. In initial studies, Impella resulted in a reduced need for repeat interventions and reduced rates of hypotension, but no benefit in mortality. However, MACCE rates with Impella have gradually declined over the last 10 years, reflecting increased operator experience and technical improvements. Thus, a large, randomized trial is needed to assess the efficacy of Impella in HR-PCI with contemporary standards of care. There is currently no individual parameter that can identify patients who would benefit from MCS use in elective HR-PCI. To address this gap, we propose an algorithm that combines anatomical complexity, comorbidities, and clinical presentation to accurately identify candidates for MCS-assisted HR-PCI.

Cost-Effectiveness of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Complex PCI: Prespecified Analysis of RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI Trial

BACKGROUND

Although clinical benefits of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with complex coronary artery lesions have been observed in previous trials, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy is uncertain.

METHODS

RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance vs Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) was conducted in Korea between May 2018 and May 2021. This prespecified cost-effectiveness substudy was conducted using Markov model that simulated 3 states: (1) post-PCI, (2) spontaneous myocardial infarction, and (3) death. A simulated cohort was derived from the intention-to-treat population, and input parameters were extracted from either the trial data or previous publications. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using time horizon of 3 years (within trial) and lifetime. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), an indicator of incremental cost on additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, in intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. The current analysis was performed using the Korean health care sector perspective with reporting the results in US dollar (1200 Korean Won, ₩=1 dollar, $). Willingness to pay threshold was $35 000 per QALY gained.

RESULTS

A total of 1639 patients were included in the trial. During 3-year follow-up, medical costs ($8661 versus $7236; incremental cost, $1426) and QALY (2.34 versus 2.31; incremental QALY, 0.025) were both higher in intravascular imaging-guided PCI than angiography-guided PCI, resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $57 040 per QALY gained within trial data. Conversely, lifetime simulation showed total cumulative medical cost was reversed between the 2 groups ($40 455 versus $49 519; incremental cost, -$9063) with consistently higher QALY (8.24 versus 7.89; incremental QALY, 0.910) in intravascular imaging-guided PCI than angiography-guided PCI, resulting in a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Consistently, 70% of probabilistic iterations showed cost-effectiveness of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The current cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that imaging-guided PCI is more cost-effective than angiography-guided PCI by reducing medical cost and increasing quality-of-life in complex coronary artery lesions in long-term follow-up.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.

Segmentation of anatomical layers and imaging artifacts in intravascular polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography using attending physician and boundary cardinality losses

Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are widely available for assessing coronary stenoses and provide critical information to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention. Intravascular polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) measures the polarization state of the light scattered by the vessel wall in addition to conventional cross-sectional images of subsurface microstructure. This affords reconstruction of tissue polarization properties and reveals improved contrast between the layers of the vessel wall along with insight into collagen and smooth muscle content. Here, we propose a convolutional neural network model, optimized using two new loss terms (Boundary Cardinality and Attending Physician), that takes advantage of the additional polarization contrast and classifies the lumen, intima, and media layers in addition to guidewire and plaque shadows. Our model segments the media boundaries through fibrotic plaques and continues to estimate the outer media boundary behind shadows of lipid-rich plaques. We demonstrate that our multi-class classification model outperforms existing methods that exclusively use conventional OCT data, predominantly segment the lumen, and consider subsurface layers at most in regions of minimal disease. Segmentation of all anatomical layers throughout diseased vessels may facilitate stent sizing and will enable automated characterization of plaque polarization properties for investigation of the natural history and significance of coronary atheromas.

Clinical outcomes of optical coherence tomography versus conventional angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Performing optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a guide for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to conventional coronary angiography has been the subject of the recent cohorts and randomized trials. However, clear evidence demonstrating its superiority is still controversial.

METHODS

We performed a thorough search in digital databases to find the relevant observational studies and randomized trials comparing OCT and angiography in patients undergoing PCI. A random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken comparing clinical outcomes to generate an odds ratio (OR) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyzes were performed based on study design, underlying cardiac condition, and complexity of cases.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies (10 RCTs and 11 observational studies) with 11,163 participants (5319: OCT and 5844: angiography group) were included for quantitative synthesis. Performing OCT was associated with lower odds of all-cause (OR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.48; 0.67)) and cardiac mortality (OR (95% CI) = 0.47 (0.35; 0.63)), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.48; 0.76)), myocardial infarction (OR (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.64; 0.97)), and stent thrombosis (OR (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.39; 0.96)) compared to the angiography group. Other clinical outcomes were similar between the studied groups. The outperformance of OCT was more evident in observational studies and the ones with PCI on complex lesions.

CONCLUSION

Performing OCT prior to PCI is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to angiography alone based on contemporary evidence. Future well-designed randomized trials are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

The role of optical coherence tomography in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions: is left main the final challenge?

Left main (LM) coronary artery disease is a high-risk lesion subset, with important prognostic implications for the patients. Recent advances in the field of interventional cardiology have narrowed the gap between surgical and percutaneous approach of this complex lesion setting. However, the rate of repeat revascularization remains higher in the case of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on long-term follow-up. As such, the need for better stent optimization strategies has led to the development of intravascular imaging techniques, represented mainly by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). These techniques are both able to provide excellent pre- and post-PCI guidance. While IVUS is an established modality in optimizing LM PCI, and is recommended by international revascularization guidelines, data and experience on the use of OCT are still limited. This review paper deeply analyzes the current role of OCT imaging in the setting of LM disease, particularly focusing on its utility in assessing plaque morphology and distribution, vessel dimensions and proper stent sizing, analyzing mechanisms of stent failure such as malapposition and underexpansion, guiding bifurcation stenting, as well as offering a direct comparison with IVUS in this critical clinical scenario, based on the most recent available data.

OPTImized coronary interventions eXplaIn the bEst cliNical outcomEs (OPTI-XIENCE) study. Rationale and study design

INTRODUCTION

Clinical events may occur after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly in complex lesions and complex patients. The optimization of PCI result, using pressure guidewire and intracoronary imaging techniques, may reduce the risk of these events. The hypothesis of the present study is that the clinical outcome of patients with indication of PCI and coronary stent implantation that are at high risk of events can be improved with an unrestricted use of intracoronary tools that allow PCI optimization.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Observational prospective multicenter international study, with a follow-up of 12 months, including 1064 patients treated with a cobalt‑chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Inclusion criteria include any of the following: Lesion length > 28 mm; Reference vessel diameter < 2.5 mm or > 4.25 mm; Chronic total occlusion; Bifurcation with side branch ≥2.0 mm;Ostial lesion; Left main lesion; In-stent restenosis; >2 lesions stented in the same vessel; Treatment of >2 vessels; Acute myocardial infarction; Renal insufficiency; Left ventricular ejection fraction <30 %; Staged procedure. The control group will be comprised by a similar number of matched patients included in the "extended risk" cohort of the XIENCE V USA study. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF) (composite of ischemia-driven TLR, myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel, or cardiac death related to the target vessel). Secondary endpoints will include overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarction, TVR, TLR, target vessel failure, and definitive or probable stent thrombosis at 1 year.

IMPLICATIONS

The ongoing OPTI-XIENCE study will contribute to the growing evidence supporting the use of intra-coronary imaging techniques for stent optimization in patients with complex coronary lesions.

Cardiac Optical Coherence Tomography: History, Current Status, and Perspective

For more than 2 decades since the first imaging procedure was performed in a living patient, intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT), with its unprecedented image resolution, has made significant contributions to cardiovascular medicine in the realms of vascular biology research and percutaneous coronary intervention. OCT has contributed to a better understanding of vascular biology by providing insights into the pathobiology of atherosclerosis, including plaque phenotypes and the underlying mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes such as plaque erosion, neoatherosclerosis, stent thrombosis, and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries. Moreover, OCT has been used as an adjunctive imaging tool to angiography for the guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention procedures to optimize outcomes. However, broader application of OCT has faced challenges, including subjective interpretation of the images and insufficient clinical outcome data. Future developments including artificial intelligence-assisted interpretation, multimodality catheters, and micro-OCT, as well as large prospective outcome studies could broaden the impact of OCT on cardiovascular medicine.

Role of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in intracoronary imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review

Coronary angiography has long been the standard for coronary imaging, but it has limitations in assessing vessel wall anatomy and guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intracoronary imaging techniques like intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can overcome these limitations. IVUS uses ultrasound and OCT uses near-infrared light to visualize coronary pathology in unique ways due to differences in temporal and spatial resolution. These techniques have evolved to offer clinical utility in plaque characterization and vessel assessment during PCI. Meta-analyses and adjusted observational studies suggest that both IVUS and OCT-guided PCI correlate with reduced cardiovascular risks compared to angiographic guidance alone. While IVUS demonstrates consistent clinical outcome benefits, OCT evidence is less robust. IVUS has progressed from early motion detection to high-resolution systems, with smaller compatible catheters. OCT utilizes near infrared light to achieve unparalleled resolutions, but requires temporary blood clearance for optimal imaging. Enhanced visualization and guidance make IVUS and OCT well-suited for higher risk PCI in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease by allowing detailed visualization of complex lesions and ensuring optimal stent deployment and positioning in PCI for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, improving outcomes. IVUS and recent advancements in zero- and low-contrast OCT techniques can reduce nephrotoxic contrast exposure, thus helping to minimize PCI complications in these high-risk patient groups. IVUS and OCT provide valuable insights into coronary pathophysiology and guide interventions precisely compared to angiography alone. Both have comparable clinical outcomes, emphasizing the need for tailored imaging choices based on clinical scenarios. Continued refinement and integration of intravascular imaging will likely play a pivotal role in optimizing coronary interventions and outcomes. This systematic review aims to delve into the nuances of IVUS and OCT, highlighting their strengths and limitations as PCI adjuncts.

Drug-Coated Balloon for de-novo Coronary Artery Lesions Exceeding 2.5 mm in Diameter: Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis and Clinical Follow-Up

Objective

To investigate the precise changes in the lumen and lesions, and clinical outcomes after DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter through a detailed analysis of OCT.

Methods

This is a prospective study including 53 consecutive patients with 55 de-novo coronary lesions, who underwent DCB angioplasty-only between January 2021 and April 2022. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT were performed before percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), immediately after PCI, and at 6-9 months follow-up after PCI. Target lesion failure (TLF) was the primary endpoint of the present study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors or risks for late lumen enlargement (LLE).

Results

A total of 52 patients were successfully treated with DCB. The median follow-up was 7 months, and the incidence of TLF was 7.5%. After the DCB procedure, 43 patients had their scheduled angiographic and OCT examination. QCA demonstrated that the late lumen loss was -0.79 ± 0.28 mm. OCT demonstrated LLE in 79.1% and dissection healing in 65.1% of lesions. After multivariable logistic analysis, type B dissection (odds ratio [OR] 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.41, p = 0.037) was found to be a predictor of LLE, but lipid plaque (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.63, p = 0.015) was a risk of LLE.

Conclusion

This is the first and largest prospective study to assess the outcomes of DCB treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter and the detection of significant vessel enlargement and dissection healing guide by OCT. DCB could be a novel, safe and effective treatment for de-novo coronary lesions exceeding 2.5 mm in diameter through a detailed analysis of OCT.

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Before and After Standardized Optimization Protocols

BACKGROUND

Although benefits of intravascular imaging (IVI) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been observed in previous studies, it is not known whether changes in contemporary practice, especially with application of standardized optimization protocols, have improved clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to investigate whether clinical outcomes of IVI-guided PCI are different before and after the application of standardized optimization protocols in using IVI.

METHODS

2,972 patients from an institutional registry (2008-2015, before application of standardized optimization protocols, the past group) and 1,639 patients from a recently published trial (2018-2021 after application of standardized optimization protocols, the present group) were divided into 2 groups according to use of IVI. The primary outcome was 3-year target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Significant reduction of TVF was observed in the IVI-guided PCI group compared with the angiography-guided PCI group (10.0% vs 6.7%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.027), mainly driven by reduced cardiac death or myocardial infarction in both past and present IVI-guided PCI groups. When comparing past IVI and present IVI groups, TVF was significantly lower in the present IVI group (8.5% vs 5.1%; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.94; P = 0.025), with the difference being driven by reduced target vessel revascularization in the present IVI group. Consistent results were observed in inverse-probability-weighting adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

IVI-guided PCI improved clinical outcomes more than angiography-guided PCI. In addition, application of standardized optimization protocols when using IVI further improved clinical outcomes after PCI. (Intravascular Imaging- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Complex Coronary Artery Disease [RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI]; NCT03381872; and the institutional cardiovascular catheterization database of Samsung Medical Center: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patient Undergoing CABG or PCI; NCT03870815).

Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Despite the initial evidence supporting the utility of intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), adoption remains low. Recent new trial data have become available. An updated study-level meta-analysis comparing intravascular imaging to angiography to guide PCI was performed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, and all-cause death. Mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to investigate the impact of complex PCI on the primary outcomes. A total of 16 trials with 7814 patients were included. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 28.8 months. Intravascular imaging led to a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (relative risk [RR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.82]; P<0.001), cardiac death (RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.34-0.71]; P<0.001), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40-0.99]; P=0.046), target-lesion revascularization (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]; P=0.01), and target-vessel revascularization (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.45-0.80]; P<0.001). In complex lesion subsets, the point estimate for imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI for all-cause death was a RR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.55-1.02; P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PCI, intravascular imaging is associated with reductions in major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, stent thrombosis, target-lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. The magnitude of benefit is large and consistent across all included studies. There may also be benefits in all-cause death, particularly in complex lesion subsets. These results support the use of intravascular imaging as standard of care and updates of clinical guidelines.

Two-year results from Onyx ONE clear in patients with high bleeding risk on one-month DAPT with and without intracoronary imaging

BACKGROUND

Patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) are often treated with abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce bleeding risk, however this strategy is associated with an increase in ischemic events, especially if the acute PCI result is suboptimal. We compared clinical outcomes among patients with HBR treated with 1-month DAPT who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- or optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI versus those who underwent angiography-guided PCI without intravascular imaging.

METHODS

The Onyx ONE Clear study includes patients with HBR from the Onyx ONE US/Japan and Onyx ONE randomized studies who were treated with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death (CD) or myocardial infarction (MI) between 1 month and 2 years after PCI. Propensity-score adjustments and matching were performed for differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

Among the 1507 patients in Onyx ONE Clear, 271 (18.0 %) had IVUS or OCT used during PCI (Imaging-guided group) and 1236 (82.0 %) underwent Angiography-guided PCI (Angio-guided group). Imaging-guided patients were less likely to present with atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, and left ventricle ejection fraction ≤35 %. Conversely, Imaging-guided patients were more likely to have complex (ACC/AHA type B2/C), longer, and heavily calcified lesions. Between 1 month and 2 years, the composite rate of CD or MI was similar between Imaging-guided and Angio-guided patients (9.9 % vs. 12.4 %, P = 0.33). There was also no difference between groups after adjustment; (P = 0.56). However, CD was significantly lower among Imaging-guided patients (2.7 % vs. 6.1 %, P = 0.048). There were no between-group differences in MI or stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching results were similar.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher lesion complexity, using intravascular imaging guidance for PCI between 1-month and 2-years follow-up had comparable outcomes with angiographic guidance alone in patients with HBR treated with 1-month DAPT. (ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT03647475 and NCT03344653).

NON-STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

BARC: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; DES: drug-eluting stent; HBR: high bleeding risk; IVUS: intravascular ultrasound; OCT: optical coherence tomography; SAPT: single antiplatelet therapy.

Effects of Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Diabetes Mellitus undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of early vs. late tirofiban administration in the treatment of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHODS

120 patients with STEMI and DM treated with pPCI were randomly divided into an observation group (n=60) and a control group (n=60). The observation group and the control group were intravenously injected with a bolus of tirofiban preoperatively or intraoperatively, respectively; both groups were then given an intravenous infusion over 24 h at 0.15 μg/kg/min. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade flow, myocardial perfusion index, and functional heart parameters, as well as major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Functional heart parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac output, were significantly improved in the observation group 6 months after discharge. Thrombus aspiration, inflammatory factors, and cardiac troponin I (cTNI) were more significantly decreased in the observation group than in the control group. The sum-ST-segment elevation at 2 h after pPCI treatment in the observation group was better than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions and bleeding between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The administration of tirofiban before reperfusion therapy compared with after reperfusion therapy is more effective in reducing the hyperthrombotic load, thrombus aspiration, inflammatory factors, and cTNI and can effectively improve myocardial perfusion and heart function.

Enhanced Stent Imaging System Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Linked to Optimize Stent Placement

Stent under-expansion is a predictor of restenosis and stent thrombosis. It remains uncertain whether enhanced stent imaging (ESI) (CLEARstent) guidance can improve stent under-expansion. Our aim was to assess the effect of using ESI on stent under-expansion, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a single center, cross-sectional observational study. Participants attending our cardiology clinic with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome, from March to September 2020 were recruited. A total of 164 patients who underwent post-PCI ESI (CLEARstent) were compared with 77 age- and sex-matched control patients. Post-procedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was calculated. The patients in the ESI-guided PCI group, had a median age of 61 (54-69 IQR 25-75) years and 76.8% (n = 126) were males. The patients in ESI-guided PCI group had a greater minimal lumen diameter compared with the X-ray guided PCI group (βeta coefficient:2.88 (95% CI:2.58-2.99) vs βeta coefficient 2.55 (95% CI 2.34-2.63), P < .001). Our finding supports the use of the ESI system to optimize stent placement as expressed by the MLD.