Clinical Applicability of Monitoring Antihypertensive Drug Levels in Blood

'Under pressure': The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of hypertension

Antihypertensive drugs do not qualify as optimal candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), given their obvious physiological effect, the absence of a clear relationship between drug concentrations and pharmacodynamic outcomes and their wide therapeutic range. However, since non-adherence is a major challenge in hypertension management, using drug concentrations can be of value to identify non-adherence as a first step towards better blood pressure control. In this article we discuss the key challenges associated with measuring and interpreting antihypertensive drug concentrations that are important when TDM is used to improve non-adherence. Additionally, we elaborate on the role of TDM in optimizing antihypertensive drug treatment besides addressing non-adherence by highlighting its value in specific patient groups with altered pharmacokinetic parameters such as female vs. male or elderly patients.

Controversies related to renal artery denervation and devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review article discusses the controversies, strengths, and limitations of the current literature on renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension, as well as the future directions of this intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been conflicting data from the different randomized control trials assessing the efficacy of renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension.

SUMMARY

Renal artery denervation is achieved by ablating the sympathetic nerves surrounding the renal arteries using endovascular ultrasound, radiofrequency, or alcohol. Our review article highlights that renal artery denervation is generally effective in improving blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved the ReCor Medical Paradise system, and the Symplicity Spyral RDN systems for renal artery denervation.

Physician and patient adherence in hypertension trials: a point of view on an important issue to resolve

INTRODUCTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are important sources of evidence that strongly influence guidelines for patient management, including for elevated blood pressure in adults.

AREAS COVERED

Critical questions regarding the interpretation of hypertension trial results have recently increased, especially for concerns over methodology. In particular, investigator adherence to the protocol and patient adherence to investigational drugs are often far from optimal. These issues may be ignored or underreported because physicians' behavior during trials is often not monitored and patients' medication adherence is neither measured adequately nor reported or analyzed in the final report or in the publication. This situation may lead to misinterpretations of study results and misevaluations of the safety and efficacy profile of new drugs. In this short review, the problem of measuring, reporting, and analyzing drug adherence in RCTs is discussed and illustrated with several examples in the field of hypertension.

EXPERT OPINION

The main conclusion is that drug adherence should always be measured in clinical trials, possibly with more than one method. In addition, prespecified analyses of adherence data should be included in the statistical plan of all trials to improve their overall quality.

Genetic Variation in ABCB1, ADRB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NEDD4L and NR3C2 Confers Differential Susceptibility to Resistant Hypertension among South Africans

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) prevalence ranges from 4 to 19% in Africa. There is a paucity of data on the role of genetic variation on RHTN among Africans. We set out to investigate the role of polymorphisms in ABCB1, ADRB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NEDD4L, and NR3C2, on RHTN susceptibility among South Africans. Using a retrospective matched case-control study, 190 RHTN patients (cases: blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mmHg on ≥3 anti-hypertensives or BP < 140/90 mmHg on >3 anti-hypertensives) and 189 non-RHTN patients (controls: <3 anti-hypertensives, BP < 140/90 or ≥140/90 mmHg), 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), quantitative PCR and Sanger sequencing. Genetic association analyses were conducted using the additive model and multivariable logistic regression. Homozygosity for CYP3A5 rs776746C/C genotype (p = 0.02; OR: 0.44; CI: 0.22-0.89) was associated with reduced risk for RHTN. Homozygous ADRB1 rs1801252G/G (p = 0.02; OR: 3.30; CI: 1.17-10.03) and NEDD4L rs4149601A/A genotypes (p = 0.001; OR: 3.82; CI: 1.67-9.07) were associated with increased risk for RHTN. Carriers of the of ADRB1 rs1801252-rs1801253 G-C haplotype had 2.83-fold odds of presenting with RHTN (p = 0.04; OR: 2.83; CI: 1.05-8.20). These variants that are associated with RHTN may have clinical utility in the selection of antihypertensive drugs in our population.

Quality-of-life and beliefs about medication in relation to a therapy adherence intervention in resistant hypertension: the Resistant HYpertension: MEasure to ReaCh Targets trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of personalized feedback on therapy adherence testing results on quality of life and beliefs about medication in patients with resistant hypertension, as well as to identify patient-oriented predictors of therapy adherence.

METHODS

This study was a prespecified post hoc analysis of the multicenter randomized controlled trial Resistant HYpertension: MEasure to ReaCh Targets (RHYME-RCT). Patients were randomized to a personalized feedback conversation on measured antihypertensive drug levels additional to standard-of-care, or standard-of-care only. The primary outcomes consisted of EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) scores at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients with median age 61.5 [25th-75th percentile: 55.8-69.3] years (21.4% women) were included. Mean blood pressure ±SD was 149.8/84.1 ± 14.9/13.8 mmHg while being on a median of 5.6 [4.8-7.3] defined daily dosages (DDD) of antihypertensive drugs. At 12 months, no differences were observed in EQ-5D-5L index (0.81 [0.69-0.89] vs. 0.89 [0.73-1.00]; P = 0.18) and visual analogue scale score on general patient-perceived health (70 [60-80] vs. 70 [60-82]; P = 0.53) between the intervention-arm and the standard-of-care only-arm. Likewise, individual EQ-5D-5L domain scores and BMQ scores did not differ between both arms. Irrespective of the intervention, independent positive predictors of the percentage adherence were patient age, EQ-5D-5L index score, BMQ-specific necessity score and concern score, whereas the total number of drugs prescribed was a negative predictor.

CONCLUSION

Within this prespecified subanalysis of the randomized RHYME-RCT trial, implementation of a personalized feedback conversation targeting therapy adherence did not improve health-related quality-of-life and beliefs about medication in patients with resistant hypertension.

Towards clinical adherence monitoring of oral endocrine breast cancer therapies by LC-HRMS-method development, validation, comparison of four sample matrices, and proof of concept

Oral endocrine therapies (OET) for breast cancer treatment need to be taken over a long period of time and are associated with considerable side effects. Therefore, adherence to OET is an important issue and of high clinical significance for breast cancer patients' caregivers. We hypothesized that a new bioanalytical strategy based on liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry might be suitable for unbiased adherence monitoring (AM) of OET. Four different biomatrices (plasma, urine, finger prick blood by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), oral fluid (OF)) were evaluated regarding their suitability for AM of the OET abemaciclib, anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole, palbociclib, ribociclib, tamoxifen, and endoxifen. An analytical method was developed and validated according to international recommendations. The analytical procedures were successfully validated in all sample matrices for most analytes, even meeting requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring. Chromatographic separation of analytes was achieved in less than 10 min and limits of quantification ranged from 1 to 1000 ng/mL. The analysis of 25 matching patient samples showed that AM of OET is possible using all four matrices with the exception of, e.g., letrozole and exemestane in OF. We were able to show that unbiased bioanalytical AM of OET was possible using different biomatrices with distinct restrictions. Sample collection of VAMS was difficult in most cases due to circulatory restraints and peripheral neuropathy in fingers and OF sampling was hampered by dry mouth syndrome in some cases. Although parent compounds could be detected in most of the urine samples, metabolites should be included when analyzing urine or OF. Plasma is currently the most suitable matrix due to available reference concentrations.

Antihypertensive drug concentration measurement combined with personalized feedback in resistant hypertension: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adherence to antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) is crucial for controlling blood pressure (BP). We aimed to determine the effectiveness of measuring AHD concentrations using a dried blood spot (DBS) sampling method to identify nonadherence, combined with personalized feedback, in reducing resistant hypertension.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (RHYME-RCT, ICTRP NTR6914) in patients with established resistant hypertension. Patients were randomized to receive either an intervention with standard of care (SoC) or SoC alone. SoC consisted of BP measurement and DBS sampling at baseline, 3 months (t3), 6 months (t6), and 12 months (t12); AHD concentrations were measured but not reported in this arm. In the intervention arm, results on AHD concentrations were discussed during a personalized feedback conversation at baseline and t3. Study endpoints included the proportion of patients with RH and AHD adherence at t12.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were randomized to receive the intervention+SoC, and 51 were randomized to receive SoC alone. The proportion of adherent patients improved from 70.0 to 92.5% in the intervention+SoC arm ( P  = 0.008, n  = 40) and remained the same in the SoC arm (71.4%, n  = 42). The difference in adherence between the arms was statistically significant ( P  = 0.014). The prevalence of resistant hypertension decreased to 75.0% in the intervention+SoC arm ( P  < 0.001, n  = 40) and 59.5% in the SoC arm ( P  < 0.001, n  = 42) at t12; the difference between the arms was statistically nonsignificant ( P  = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Personalized feedback conversations based on DBS-derived AHD concentrations improved AHD adherence but did not reduce the prevalence of RH.

Lessons learned from conducting a randomized controlled trial to improve non-adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment

PURPOSE

Hypertension significantly contributes to cardiovascular diseases and premature deaths. Effective treatment is crucial to reduce cardiovascular risks, but poor adherence to antihypertensive drugs is a major issue. Numerous studies attempted to investigate interventions for identifying non-adherence, but often failed to address the issue effectively. The RHYME-RCT trial sought to bridge this gap by measuring non-adherence by determining antihypertensive drug concentrations in blood through a dried blood spot (DBS) method in patients with resistant hypertension. This measurement was followed by personalized feedback to improve adherence. During the course of this trial several challenges emerged, including selection bias, the gatekeeper role of physicians, the Hawthorne effect and the role of randomization.

AIM

This communication aims to inform fellow researchers and clinicians of challenges that can arise when conducting clinical trials to improve adherence and offer insights for refining study designs to avoid these issues in forthcoming adherence studies.

Monitoring antihypertensive drug concentrations to determine nonadherence in hypertensive patients with or without a kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) is a major contributor to pseudo-resistant hypertension. The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of nonadherence to AHDs among patients visiting the nephrology and vascular outpatient clinics.

METHODS

Patients were eligible to participate in this prospective observational study if they used at least two AHDs that could be measured with a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method and had an office blood pressure at least 140 and/or at least 90 mmHg. For resistant hypertension, included patients had to use at least three AHDs including a diuretic or four AHDs. Adherence was assessed by measuring drug concentrations in blood. The complete absence of drug in blood was defined as nonadherence. A posthoc analysis was performed to determine the influence of a having a kidney transplant on the adherence rates.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients were included of whom 66 patients fulfilled the definition of resistant hypertension. The overall adherence rate to AHDs was 78.2% ( n  = 111 patients), with the highest adherence rate for irbesartan (100%, n  = 9) and lowest adherence rate for bumetanide ( n  = 69%, n  = 13). In further analysis, only kidney transplantation could be identified as an important factor for adherence (adjusted odds ratio = 3.35; 95% confidence interval 1.23-9.09). A posthoc analysis showed that patients with a kidney transplant were more likely to be adherent to AHDs (non-KT cohort 64.0% vs. KT-cohort 85.7%, χ 2 (2) = 10.34, P  = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The adherence rate to AHDs in hypertensive patients was high (78.2%) and even higher after a kidney transplant (85.7%). Furthermore, patients after kidney transplant had a lower risk of being nonadherent to AHDs.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Arterial Hypertension

(1) Background: This study was planned to assess the concentration of antihypertensive drugs (AHD) in the blood serum in patients with controlled and uncontrolled arterial hypertension (AH). (2) Methods: We assessed 46 patients with AH. Based on the results of 24 h blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), the patients were randomized into two groups. The first group consisted of the patients with controlled AH; the second group consisted of the patients with uncontrolled AH. Venous blood was taken in both groups of patients in the morning before and 2 h after taking drugs to assess the concentration of lisinopril, amlodipine, valsartan, and indapamide. (3) Results. The first group included 27 patients, and the second group 19 patients. In patients with uncontrolled AH, the median concentrations of lisinopril, indapamide, amlodipine, and valsartan before and after taking the drugs did not differ from patients who reached the target BP values. (p > 0.05). In some patients with uncontrolled and controlled (shown for the first time) AH the concentration of AHD was below the limit of quantitative determination. (4) Conclusions. The obtained results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of AHD, apparently, does not play a significant role in the development of ineffectiveness of the ongoing therapy for AH. Therapeutic drug monitoring can be used to test adherence to the treatment.

Measurement Tools and Utility of Hair Analysis for Screening Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication

Poor adherence to the prescribed antihypertensive therapy is an understated public health problem and is one of the main causes of the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa. Medication adherence is vital for the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment and is key to ameliorating the clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, it has often been ignored because the current methods used to assess medication adherence are not reliable, limiting their utilization in clinical practice. Therefore, the identification of the most accurate and clinically feasible method for measuring medication adherence is critical for tailoring effective strategies to improve medication adherence and consequently achieve blood pressure goals. This review not only explores various available methods for estimating medication adherence but also proposes therapeutic drug monitoring in hair for the measurement of medication adherence to the antihypertensive medication period.

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).

Closing the gap - development of an analytical methodology using volumetric absorptive microsampling of finger prick blood followed by LC-HRMS/MS for adherence monitoring of antihypertensive drugs

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), an emerging microsampling technique, is a promising tool for adherence monitoring. This study focused on development of an analytical methodology to improve VAMS-based strategies for adherence assessment by analyzing angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, loop diuretics, a potassium-sparing diuretic, and a thiazide diuretic. Development included sample preparation, chromatographic conditions, mass spectrometry settings, validation, and demonstrating proof of concept. Quantification of analytes, by name furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, torasemide, and the active metabolites, canrenone, enalaprilat, and ramiprilat in finger prick blood (FPB), was validated based on international guidelines. Selectivity, carryover, and within/between-run accuracy and precision were in accordance with the recommendations. The matrix effect was evaluated at three different hematocrit levels (HT: 20%, 40%, 60%) and the coefficients of variation did not exceed 15%. Dilution integrity (1:10 and 1:20) was given for all analytes except lisinopril, yet for lisinopril, the therapeutic range was already covered by the calibration range. Long-term stability in VAMS tips was tested for 2 weeks at 24 °C in the dark and revealed no degradation of analytes. The proof of concept was performed by analyzing 35 intakes of ACE-inhibitors and diuretics in 18 VAMS and matched plasma samples. Hereby, determined concentration in FPB and plasma cannot be used interchangeably, and thus specific reference ranges for whole blood must be established. Nevertheless, the VAMS-based strategy was shown to be suitable for assessing adherence of all classes of antihypertensive drugs used in the guidelines to manage hypertension.

Development and Validation of a Dried Blood Spot Assay Using UHPLC-MS/MS to Identify and Quantify 12 Antihypertensive Drugs and 4 Active Metabolites: Clinical Needs and Analytical Limitations

PURPOSE

As nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) can increase the risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalization, and higher costs, there is a need for a reliable, objective, and easy method to assess nonadherence in patients. The dried blood spot (DBS) sampling method used to measure drug concentrations meets these requirements. For detecting nonadherence, identification is more important than quantification. Owing to their use in clinical practice, it is important to measure multiple AHDs with a single method. Therefore, we developed and validated a single DBS method for 17 commonly used AHDs and 4 active metabolites using ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS).

METHODS

Analytical validation of the DBS assay was performed in accordance with the guidelines on bioanalytical method validation of the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration as well as the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology guidelines.

RESULTS

We validated 12 of the 17 AHDs according to the European Medicines Agency and Food and Drug Administration requirements for bioanalytical method validation. Eleven AHDs were validated for both identification and quantification of drug concentrations, whereas nifedipine was only validated for identification. However, 5 of the 17 AHDs were excluded due to suboptimal validation results. Lercanidipine was excluded due to nonlinearity, and all 4 AHDs measured in the negative mode of UHPLC-MS/MS were not in accordance with one or more of the acceptance criteria and were therefore excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

The described method accurately measured AHDs in DBS and can be used to determine nonadherence in patients. However, method validation revealed a challenging balance between analytical limitations and clinical needs when analyzing multiple drugs using the same method.

Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: The DEGREE study

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is a modifiable risk factor in patients at the highest risk for cardiovascular events. New invasive treatment options are becoming available that might be particularly appealing for high-risk patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of high-risk patients on routine therapy that do not meet guideline recommended ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) targets.

METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Erasmus University Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18-80 years, (2) drugs prescribed for hypertension or history of hypertension and (3) high cardiovascular risk as defined according to the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines. Patients underwent standardized office blood pressure (OBP) and same-day 24-h ABP measurements. Blood pressure (BP) control was defined according to the 2018 ESC/ESH and 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years, 35% female). Mean OBP was 142.2/81.9 ± 18.6/12.6 mmHg and mean 24-h ABP was 126.1/70.1 ± 14.3/9.2 mmHg. Patients were on 2.0 [25th-75th percentile: 1.0-3.3] Defined Daily Doses of antihypertensive drugs. ESC/ESH guideline 24-h ABP and OBP targets were not met in 41.8% (95%CI: 31.5-52.6%) and 52.7% (95%CI: 42.0-63.3%), respectively. ACC/AHA guideline 24-h ABP and OBP targets were not met in 59.3% (95%CI: 48.5-69.5%) and 79.1% (95%CI: 69.3-86.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BP remains uncontrolled in 40-60% of high-risk hypertensive patients despite routine use of guideline-recommended therapy. Our findings support the search towards novel invasive BP lowering treatment options.

Sex Differences in Spironolactone and the Active Metabolite Canrenone Concentrations and Adherence

We aim to investigate sex differences in blood concentrations of spironolactone and the active metabolite canrenone in resistant hypertension patients. Furthermore, sex differences in adherence for spironolactone and other antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) were studied. The patients in this post hoc study had all participated in a single-blind randomized controlled trial called RHYME-RCT (Dutch Trial Register, NL6736). Concentrations in blood of several AHDs were assessed in RHYME-RCT to investigate adherence to treatment. This allowed for a comparison of drug exposure to spironolactone and canrenone between males and females. In linear regression models, no statistically significant sex differences (N = 35) in spironolactone (B =−10.23, SE = 7.92, p = 0.206) or canrenone (B = 1.24, SE = 10.96, p = 0.911) concentrations after adjustment for dose and time between sampling and intake were found. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences in non-adherence to spironolactone were found between sexes (N = 54, male 15% vs. female 38%, p = 0.100), but non-adherence to spironolactone was associated with non-adherence to other AHDs (p ≤ 0.001). Spironolactone and canrenone concentrations were not different between males and females with resistant hypertension. Although not statistically significant, females were twice as likely to be non-adherent to spironolactone compared to males, and thereby also more likely to be non-adherent to other AHDs.

Nonadherence in Hypertension: How to Develop and Implement Chemical Adherence Testing

Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication is common, especially in those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (true treatment-resistant hypertension requires exclusion of nonadherence), and its routine detection is supported by clinical guidelines. Chemical adherence testing is a reliable and valid method to detect adherence, yet methods are unstandardized and are not ubiquitous. This article describes the principles of chemical adherence testing for hypertensive patients and provides a set of recommendations for centers wishing to develop the test. We recommend testing should be done in either of two instances: (1) in those who have resistant hypertension or (2) in those on 2 antihypertensives who have a less than 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure on addition of the second antihypertensive medication. Furthermore, we recommend that verbal consent is secured before undertaking the test, and the results should be discussed with the patient. Based on medications prescribed in United Kingdom, European Union, and United States, we list top 20 to 24 drugs that cover >95% of hypertension prescriptions which may be included in the testing panel. Information required to identify these medications on mass spectrometry platforms is likewise provided. We discuss issues related to ethics, sample collection, transport, stability, urine versus blood samples, qualitative versus quantitative testing, pharmacokinetics, instrumentation, validation, quality assurance, and gaps in knowledge. We consider how to best present, interpret, and discuss chemical adherence test results with the patient. In summary, this guidance should help clinicians and their laboratories in the development of chemical adherence testing of prescribed antihypertensive drugs.

Introducing the importance and difficulties of a three-step approach to improve nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: a case series

Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs is an important reason for not reaching blood pressure goals. A possible method to improve nonadherence involves three essential steps: identification of nonadherent patients (step 1), determination of underlying causes (step 2) and a personalized solution (step 3). We present three unique cases to show the importance and difficulties of this three-step approach. Patients participated in a randomized controlled trial to improve nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs (RHYME-RCT, Dutch Trial Register NL6736). Drug level measurements were used to identify nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs and communication on drug levels was supported by a tailored feedback tool in these patients. These cases showed that a three-step approach of identifying nonadherence and determination of the underlying cause, can lead to a personalized solution to improve therapy even when nonadherence was excluded. Open communication with patients remains an essential part when improving nonadherence.

Evaluation and analytical applicability of a novel volumetric absorptive microsampling strategy for adherence monitoring of antihypertensive drugs by means of LC-HRMS/MS

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), an emerging microsampling technique, is expected to overcome some disadvantages of dried blood spots. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a VAMS-based strategy for quantifying ten frequently prescribed antihypertensive drugs (AHD) (amlodipine, bisoprolol, candesartan, carvedilol, lercanidipine, losartan carboxylic acid, metoprolol, nebivolol, telmisartan, valsartan) in finger prick blood (FPB) within the scope of adherence monitoring. The straightforward workflow consisted of VAMS tip hydration and subsequent precipitation. Samples were analyzed by using reversed phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to orbitrap mass spectrometry operating in parallel reaction monitoring mode. The analytical procedure was successfully validated based on international recommendations for most of the analytes. Selectivity and within/between-run accuracy and precision were in accordance with the recommendations. Internal standard normalized matrix factor met recommended criteria for all analytes at HT 20%, 40%, and 60% except for amlodipine were the CV exceeded 15% at HT 20% (CV 18%). Dilution integrity was given for all substances, covering the quantification in the upper part of the therapeutic range of selected AHD. Long-term stability in VAMS tips was tested and revealed degradation of lercanidipine after one week of storage at 24 °C. A proof of concept of the analytical applicability was done by quantification of selected AHD in VAMS tips and matched plasma samples. Results revealed that determined concentration in FPB by VAMS and plasma cannot be used interchangeably, and thus that specific reference ranges have to be established. However, a novel VAMS application was implemented in the context of adherence monitoring for at least the investigated AHD.

Dietary salt modifies the blood pressure response to renin-angiotensin inhibition in experimental chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease contributes to hypertension, but the mechanisms are incompletely understood. To address this, we applied the 5/6th nephrectomy rat model to characterize hypertension and the response to dietary salt and renin-angiotensin inhibition. 5/6th nephrectomy caused low-renin, salt-sensitive hypertension with hyperkalemia and unsuppressed aldosterone. Compared with sham rats, 5/6th nephrectomized rats had lower Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger isoform 3, Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl^- cotransporter, Na⁺-Cl^- cotransporter, α-epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC), and Kir4.1 levels but higher serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1, prostasin, γ-ENaC, and Kir5.1 levels. These differences correlated with plasma renin, aldosterone, and/or K⁺. On a normal-salt diet, adrenalectomy (0 ± 9 mmHg) and spironolactone (-11 ± 10 mmHg) prevented a progressive rise in blood pressure (10 ± 8 mmHg), and this was enhanced in combination with losartan (-41 ± 12 and -43 ± 9 mmHg). A high-salt diet caused skin Na⁺ and water accumulation and aggravated hypertension that could only be attenuated by spironolactone (-16 ± 7 mmHg) and in which the additive effect of losartan was lost. Spironolactone also increased natriuresis, reduced skin water accumulation, and restored vasorelaxation. In summary, in the 5/6th nephrectomy rat chronic kidney disease model, salt-sensitive hypertension develops with a selective increase in γ-ENaC and despite appropriate transporter adaptations to low renin and hyperkalemia. With a normal-salt diet, hypertension in 5/6th nephrectomy depends on angiotensin II and aldosterone, whereas a high-salt diet causes more severe hypertension mediated through the mineralocorticoid receptor.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes salt-sensitive hypertension, but the interactions between dietary salt and the renin-angiotensin system are incompletely understood. In rats with CKD on a normal-salt diet targeting aldosterone, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and especially angiotensin II reduced blood pressure. On a high-salt diet, however, only MR blockade attenuated hypertension. These results reiterate the importance of dietary salt restriction to maintain renin-angiotensin system inhibitor efficacy and specify the MR as a target in CKD.

Is Spironolactone the Preferred Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Inhibitor for Protection Against COVID-19?

ABSTRACT

The high mortality of specific groups from COVID-19 highlights the importance of host-viral interactions and the potential benefits from enhancing host defenses. SARS-CoV-2 requires angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2 as a receptor for cell entry and infection. Although both ACE inhibitors and spironolactone can upregulate tissue ACE2, there are important points of discrimination between these approaches. The virus requires proteolytic processing of its spike protein by transmembrane protease receptor serine type 2 (TMPRSS2) to enable binding to cellular ACE2. Because TMPRSS2 contains an androgen promoter, it may be downregulated by the antiandrogenic actions of spironolactone. Furin and plasmin also process the spike protein. They are inhibited by protease nexin 1 or serpin E2 (PN1) that is upregulated by angiotensin II but downregulated by aldosterone. Therefore, spironolactone should selectively downregulate furin and plasmin. Furin also promotes pulmonary edema, whereas plasmin promotes hemovascular dysfunction. Thus, a downregulation of furin and plasmin by PN1 could be a further benefit of MRAs beyond their well-established organ protection. We review the evidence that spironolactone may be the preferred RASSi to increase PN1 and decrease TMPRSS2, furin, and plasmin activities and thereby reduce viral cell binding, entry, infectivity, and bad outcomes. This hypothesis requires direct investigation.

Plasma Trough Concentrations of Antihypertensive Drugs for the Assessment of Treatment Adherence: A Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Biochemical drug screening by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in plasma is an accurate method for the quantification of plasma concentrations of antihypertensive medications in patients with hypertension. Trough concentrations could possibly be used as drug-specific cutoff values in the biochemical assessment of (non-)adherence. We performed a literature review and meta-analysis of pharmacokinetic studies to determine plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan. PubMed was searched for pharmacokinetic studies up to September 2020. Eligible studies reported steady-state mean trough concentration and their variance. Pooled trough concentrations were estimated using a three-level random effects meta-analytic model. Moderator analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. One thousand three hundred eighteen potentially relevant articles were identified of which 45 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled mean trough concentration was 9.2 ng/mL (95% CI, 7.5–10.8) for amlodipine, 41.0 ng/mL (95% CI, 17.4–64.7) for hydrochlorothiazide, and 352.9 ng/mL (95% CI, 243.5–462.3) for valsartan. Substantial heterogeneity was present for all 3 pooled estimates. Moderator analyses identified dosage as a significant moderator for the pooled trough concentration of amlodipine (β₁=0.9; P<0.05), mean age, and mean body weight for the mean trough concentration of hydrochlorothiazide (β₁=2.2, P<0.05, respectively, β₁=−4.0, P<0.05) and no significant moderators for valsartan. Plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan, measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, are highly heterogeneous over the different studies. Use of the pooled trough concentration as a cutoff in the biochemical assessment of adherence can result in inaccurate diagnosis of (non-)adherence, which may seriously harm the patient-physician relationship, and is therefore not recommended.

Is there any Hope for Monitoring Adherence in an Efficient and Feasible Way for Resistant Hypertension Diagnosis and Follow-Up?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is highly prevalent and represents a major factor affecting their effectiveness in hypertensive patients, thus contributing to apparent treatment resistance. It is however often overlooked because the methods to assess non-adherence are mainly subjective, limiting their usefulness in clinical practice. Non-adherence to treatment affects daily patient management, resulting in inappropriate, costly, and potentially harmful treatments and loss of the expected benefits from antihypertensive drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specialized centers now use a combination of objective screening tools. Firstly, snapshots of adherence levels can be provided by analytical drug detection in various biological matrixes using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and secondly electronic monitoring systems of drug delivery which provide longitudinal data on adherence. Routine utilization of those tools allows the detection of non-adherence in patients with resistant hypertension, thus enabling implementation of appropriate interventions to improve drug adherence and avoid unnecessary treatment intensification. Other complementary techniques, such as digital health feedback system with ingestible sensors, are currently evaluated. In the context of an increasing burden of uncontrolled and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, detecting non-adherence to antihypertensive therapy is, as acknowledged by the latest guidelines, a top priority to implement in clinical practice but still faces medical conservatism and disbelief.