Increased Backward Wave Pressures Rather than Flow Explain Age-Dependent Heart Rate Effects on Central, But not Peripheral Arterial Pressure

Endothelial dysfunction influences augmented aortic hemodynamic responses to metaboreflex activation in postmenopausal women

PURPOSE

Postmenopausal women experience augmented aortic hemodynamic responses to isometric handgrip (IHG) exercise and metaboreflex activation post-exercise muscle ischemia (PEMI). Relationships between endothelial function brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and aortic stiffness carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) with aortic pulsatile hemodynamics during IHG and PEMI have not been determined. The relationships between aortic hemodynamic responses to PEMI were evaluated.

METHODS

Aortic blood pressure (BP), wave reflection, and pressure of forward (Pf) and backward (Pb) waves were measured using arterial tonometry at rest, IHG at 30% maximal force, and PEMI in 30 (15/group) postmenopausal women with low (≤ 4.5%) and normal (≥ 5.5%) FMD. Hemodynamic responses were analyzed as the change (Δ) from rest to the last minute of IHG and PEMI.

RESULTS

Brachial and aortic systolic BP (SBP) responses to IHG were higher in the low vs normal FMD group (P < 0.05). Aortic SBP (Δ20 ± 8 vs Δ11 ± 7 mmHg), pulse pressure (PP) (Δ12 ± 8 vs Δ6 ± 4 mmHg), augmented pressure (AP) (Δ5 ± 3 vs Δ2 ± 2 mmHg), and Pb (Δ6 ± 4 vs Δ3 ± 2 mmHg) responses to PEMI were greater (P < 0.05) in women with low vs. normal FMD. FMD was negatively correlated with aortic SBP, PP, AP, and Pb (P < 0.05) responses to PEMI. cfPWV was not correlated with responses to PEMI.

CONCLUSION

Endothelial dysfunction relates to augmented aortic pulsatile load during metaboreflex activation, which may increase cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women.

Contribution of Increases in Late Systolic Ejection Volume to the Impact of Heart Rate on Central Arterial Pulse Pressure in a Community Sample

BACKGROUND

A lower heart rate (HR) increases left ventricular (LV) ejection volume. Whether this contributes to the adverse effects of HR on central pulse pressure (PPc) through reservoir volume effects is uncertain.

METHODS

Using noninvasive central pressure, aortic velocity, and diameter measurements in the outflow tract (echocardiography), we assessed the role of LV ejection volume as a determinant of HR relations with PPc in 824 community participants.

RESULTS

A lower HR was independently associated with both stroke volume (SV) (P < 0.001) and a shift in ejection volume from early (until the first systolic shoulder) to late (from first systolic shoulder to peak PP) systole (P < 0.05 to P < 0.005). Adjustments for LV end diastolic volume markedly diminished HR relations with SV and indexes of the shift in ejection volume to late systole. A lower HR was also independently associated with increases in forward traveling pressure waves (Pf) and PPc (P < 0.0001). However, adjustments for neither SV, nor indexes of a shift in ejection volume to late systole modified HR-Pf or PPc relations. This was despite relationships between indexes of a shift in ejection volume to late systole and both Pf and PPc (P < 0.0001). In contrast, adjustments for the increases in re-reflected and backward traveling wave pressures with a lower HR, eliminated HR-Pf and PPc relations.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to current thought, a lower HR is not associated with increases in PPc through an impact of increases in late systolic ejection volume on aortic reservoir volume, but rather through increases in backward wave pressures.

Proximal aortic stiffness modifies the relationship between heart rate and backward wave and hence central arterial pulse pressure

AIMS

A lower heart rate (HR) increases central blood pressure through enhanced backward wave pressures (Pb). We aimed to determine whether these relationships are modified by increases in aortic stiffness.

METHODS

Using non-invasive central pressure, aortic velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract (echocardiography), we assessed the impact of aortic stiffness on relationships between HR and arterial wave morphology in 603 community participants < 60 years of age, 221 ≥ 60 years, and in 287 participants with arterial events [stroke and critical limb ischemia (CLI)].

RESULTS

As compared to community participants < 60 years, those ≥ 60 years or with events had increased multivariate adjusted proximal aortic characteristic impedance (Zc) and carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) (p < 0.05 to < 0.0001). Community participants ≥ 60 years and those with events also had a greater slope of the inverse relationship between HR and Pb (p < 0.001 for comparison). While in community participants < 60 years, no interaction between indexes of aortic stiffness and HR occurred, in those ≥ 60 years (p < 0.02) and in those with arterial events (p = 0.001), beyond aortic root diameter, an interaction between Zc and HR, but not between PWV and HR independently associated with Pb. This translated into stepwise increases in the slope of HR-Pb relationships at incremental tertiles of Zc. Although HR was inversely associated with the systemic reflection coefficient in community participants ≥ 60 years (p < 0.0001), adjustments for the reflection coefficient failed to modify HR-Pb relations.

CONCLUSION

Beyond the impact on systemic wave reflection, increases in proximal aortic stiffness enhance the adverse effects of HR on Pb and hence central BP.