Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation Using the Edwards Sapien 3 Heart Valve

Simultaneous transapical transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement in patients with severe valve dysfunction: initial experience

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous transcatheter mitral valve in valve (VIV) replacement and aortic valve replacement experience is limited. We report our initial experience with simultaneous transapical transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement in patients with severe valve dysfunction.

METHODS

A total of 8 patients had simultaneous transcatheter heart valve implants for severe mitral bioprosthesis failure (VIV), with a second valve procedure that included native aortic regurgitation (n = 3) or degenerated bioprostheses in the aortic position (n = 5). All patients were treated with a self-expandable J-valve transcatheter valve, using the transapical approach.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 73.1 ± 6.2 years. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 13.8 ± 6.3%. Device success was 100% according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. No other procedure-associated complications occurred, including left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and valve migration. The mean hospital lengths of stay after the procedure were 11.5 ± 8.0 days. No deaths occurred at 30 days. At a median follow-up period of 28.7 ± 22.3 months, no patients died. All patients were in New York Heart Association functional classes I-II. Echocardiographic parameters at follow-up showed a normofunctioning J valve in the mitral position and a mean max mitral flow velocity of 2.0 ± 0.5 m/s; the J valve in the aortic position was also normofunctioning, and the mean max aortic flow velocity was 2.3 ± 0.5 m/s.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous transapical transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement using the self-expandable J valve appears to be a feasible and effective alternative to redo surgery.

Clinical Outcomes Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement Using a Meril Myval Transcatheter Heart Valve

AIM

Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) replacement for degenerated surgically implanted bioprosthetic valves has been described by both transseptal and transapical approaches. The balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter valve (Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, India) is commonly used for transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures in India. This study aimed to report in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes of Myval patients who underwent TMViV in a single tertiary care centre in India.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients with surgical bioprosthetic mitral valve failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV symptoms, despite optimal medical therapy and high or very high risk for redo surgery, were assigned to TMViV following heart team discussions. Data were retrospectively collected and outcomes assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated, with mean age 64.4 years, 60% were female, and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted risk of operative mortality score was 8.1. The failure mechanism was combined stenosis and regurgitation in 60% of patients. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. The mean postprocedure and 30-day gradients were 4.6±2.7 and 6.3±2.1, respectively. None of them had significant valvular or paravalvular leaks or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. All-cause mortality at 1 year was 10%, and all survivors were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II.

CONCLUSION

TMViV replacement with a Meril Myval can be safely performed with high technical success, and low 30-day and 1-year mortality.

An analytical, mathematical annuloplasty ring curvature model for planning of valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of high-risk patients with previous mitral valve annuloplasty require transcatheter mitral valve replacement due to recurrent regurgitation. Annulus dilation with a transcatheter balloon is often performed before valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve replacement, which is believed to reduce misalignment and paravalvular leakage, yet little evidence exists to support this practice. Our objective was to generate intuitive annuloplasty ring analyses for improved valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve replacement planning.

METHODS

We generated a mathematical model that calculates image-tracked differential ring curvature to build quantifications for improved planning for valve-in-ring procedures. Carpentier-Edwards Physio M24 and M30 (n = 2 each), Physio II M24 and M26 (n = 3 each), LivaNova AnnuloFlex M26 (n = 2), and Edwards Geoform M28 (n = 2) rings were tested with a 30-mm Toray Inoue balloon inflated to maximum rated pressures.

RESULTS

Curvature variance reduces with larger ring sizes, indicating that larger rings are initially more circular than smaller ones. Evaluated semi-rigid and rigid rings showed little to no difference between pre- and post-dilation states. Annuloflex rings (flexible band) showed a postdilation variance reduction of 32.83% (P < .001) followed by an increase after 10 minutes of relaxation that was still reduced by 19.62% relative to the initial state (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We discovered that balloon dilation does not significantly deform evaluated semi-rigid or rigid rings at maximum rated balloon pressures. This may mean that dilation for these conditions before valve-in-ring transcatheter mitral valve replacement is unnecessary. Our mathematical approach creates a foundation for extended classification of this practice, providing meaningful quantification of ring geometry.

Utilization of Two- and Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Successfully Guiding Transcatheter Mitral Valve in Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve/Mitral Ring Implantation without Complications in Patients with Thrombus in Left Atrium/Left Atrial Appendage

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to describe, for the first time to our knowledge, the utilization of both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in successfully performing transcatheter mitral valve (MV) in bioprosthetic MV/MV annulopasty ring implantation using the apical approach in 12 patients (pts) with co-existing left atrial appendage (LAA) and/or LA (left atrium) body thrombus, which is considered a contraindication for this procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All pts were severely symptomatic with severe bioprosthetic MV stenosis/regurgitation except one with a previous MV annuloplasty ring and severe native MV stenosis. Thrombus in LAA and/or LA body was noted in all by 2D and 3DTEE. All were at high/prohibitive risk for redo operation and all refused surgery. Utilizing both 2D and 3DTEE, especially 3DTEE, guidewires and the prosthesis deployment system could be manipulated under direct vision into the LA avoiding any contact with the thrombus. The procedure was successful in all with amelioration of symptoms and no embolic or other complications over a mean follow-up of 21 months.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of successfully performing this procedure in pts with thrombus in LAA and/or LA body without any complications.

Mitral Valve-in-Ring Leaflet Thrombosis: A Multimodality Imaging Primer

•

Echocardiography and CT help to detect mitral THVT.

•

Hypoattenuated leaflet thickening on CT indicates mitral thrombosis.

•

Duration of anticoagulation to prevent mitral transcatheter valve thrombosis is unclear.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Replacement Using a J-Valve System for a Failed Tricuspid Bioprosthesis

Background

Redo operation for failed tricuspid bioprosthetic valves is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation has become an acceptable option for high-risk patients with a failed tricuspid bioprosthesis. We present a case of successful tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation using a J-valve in a failed tricuspid bioprosthesis position. Case Summary. A 48-year-old male, who had a failed tricuspid bioprosthesis, presented with right-side heart failure, right-to-left shunting at the atrial level, severe dyspnea, cyanosis, peripheral edema, hepatauxe, and ascites. After the interdisciplinary assessment, we successfully performed transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with the J-valve system. At 34-month postoperative follow-up, the patient had no symptoms of heart failure and the echocardiogram showed good valve position and well hemodynamic status.

Conclusions

This case demonstrated that the J-valve system may be a new option for high-risk patients with a failed tricuspid bioprosthetic valve.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with bioprosthetic balloon expandable valve

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of the transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves with transcatheter aortic valves.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled all consecutive patients who were considered high risk for reoperations by the heart team and who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves in Tehran Heart Center, Tehran, Iran. All the procedures were performed via the transfemoral venous route under echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance with Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent successful transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position without any major complications or need for emergency surgical interventions. The mean age was 54.1 ± 17.1 years, and 8 patients were female. The median follow-up was 19.5 months (16-32.25 mon). The mean period between the last tricuspid valve replacement and transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation was 4.9 ± 2.2 years. The bioprosthetic valves were Hancock in three patients, Mosaic in the other three patients, and Biocor, Pericarbon, Perimount, and Epic in the other patients. After the procedure, the clinical and functional status improved significantly in all the patients. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased from 6.75 ± 2.66 mm Hg to 2.85 ± 0.89 (P < 0.001), and the postoperative tricuspid regurgitation severity decreased significantly in almost all the patients. The hospitalization period after the procedure was 4.4 ± 1.7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients, transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation seems to be a safe and minimally invasive alternative to reoperations for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves.

Practical Approach to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture in a Failed Bioprosthetic Surgical Valve

Bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve failure requiring reintervention is a frequent clinical problem with event rates up to 20% at 10 years after surgery. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) has become a valuable treatment option for these patients, although it requires careful procedural planning. We here describe and illustrate a stepwise approach to plan and perform ViV-TAVI and discuss preprocedural computerized tomography planning, transcatheter heart valve selection, and implantation techniques. Particular attention is paid to coronary artery protection and the possible need for bioprosthetic valve fracture since patients with small surgical aortic bioprostheses are at a risk of high residual gradients after ViV-TAVI. Considering updated clinical data on long-term outcomes following ViV-TAVI, this approach may become the default treatment strategy for patients with a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis.

The Art of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Valve-in-Ring and Valve-in-Mitral-Annular-Calcification Procedures

The SAPIEN 3 is the only transcatheter heart valve commercially available for compassionate transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with previous mitral surgical rings and mitral annular calcification (valve in ring [VIR] and valve in mitral annular calcification [VIM]). Reported outcomes have been inconsistent or poor. The review provides an overview of the authors' approach to achieve largely consistent results despite the intrinsic limitations of SAPIEN 3 VIM and VIR. The approach includes bedside modifications of the valve implant, the delivery system, and of the cardiac substrate itself. Until purpose-built devices are readily available, VIR and VIM procedures will require aggressive multidisciplinary cooperation, meticulous planning and execution, and postprocedure management by experienced, high-volume operators.

Comparison of a new bioprosthetic mitral valve to other commercially available devices under controlled conditions in a porcine model

Background/Aim

To evaluate three mitral bioprostheses (of comparable measured internal diameters) under controlled, stable, hemodynamic and surgical conditions by bench, echocardiographic, computerized tomography and autopsy comparisons pre‐ and postvalve implantation.

Methods

Fifteen similar‐sized Yorkshire pigs underwent preprocedural computerized tomography anatomic screening. Of these, 12 had consistent anatomic features and underwent implantation of a mitral bioprosthesis via thoracotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Four valves from each of three manufacturers were implanted in randomized fashion: 27‐mm Epic, 27‐mm Mosaic, and 25‐mm Mitris bioprostheses. After CPB, epicardial echocardiographic studies were performed to assess hemodynamic function and define any paravalvular leaks, followed by postoperative gated contrast computerized tomography. After euthanasia, animals underwent necropsy for anatomic evaluation.

Results

All 12 animals had successful valve implantation with no study deaths. Postoperative echocardiographic trans‐valve gradients varied among bioprosthesis manufacturers. The 25‐mm Mitris (5.1 ± 2.7)/(2.6 ± 1.3 torr) had the lowest peak/mean gradient and the 27‐mm Epic bioprosthesis had the highest (9.2 ± 3.7)/(4.6 ± 1.9 torr). Surgical valve opening area (SOA) varied with the 25‐mm Mitris having the largest SOA (2.4 ± 0.15 cm²) followed by the 27‐mm Mosaic (2.04 ± 0.23 cm²) and the 27‐mm Epic (1.8 ± 0.27 cm²) valve. Bench device orthogonal internal diameter measurements did not match manufacturer device size labeling: 25‐mm Mitris (23 × 23 mm), 27‐mm Mosaic (23 × 22 mm), 27‐mm Epic (21 × 21 mm).

Conclusions

Current advertisement/packaging of commercial surgical mitral valves is not uniform. This study demonstrates marked variations in hemodynamics, valve opening area and anatomic dimensions between similar sized mitral bioprostheses. These data suggest a critical need for standardization and close scientific evaluation of surgical mitral bioprostheses to ensure optimal clinical outcomes.

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging for Procedural Planning and Guidance of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement and Mitral Paravalvular Leak Closure

Transcatheter mitral valve interventions are an evolving and growing field in which multimodality cardiac imaging is essential for diagnosis, procedural planning, and intraprocedural guidance. Currently, transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve with a balloon-expandable valve is the only form of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) approved by the FDA, but valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annular calcification interventions are increasingly being performed. Additionally, there are several devices under investigation for implantation in a native annulus. Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a known complication of surgical or transcatheter valve implantation, where regurgitant flow occurs between the prosthetic sewing ring and the native mitral annulus. We sought to describe the role and applications of multimodality cardiac imaging for TMVR, and PVL closure, including the use of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Angiography and 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography for diagnosis, prosthetic valve evaluation, pre-procedural planning, and intraprocedural guidance, as well as evolving technologies such as fusion imaging and 3D printing.

Optimal Imaging Guidance During Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement in Bioprostheses With Radiolucent Sewing Rings

Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TMVR) offers a less invasive strategy for managing bioprosthetic mitral valve dysfunction. TMVR positioning is challenging in the setting of a radiolucent bioprosthetic sewing ring. We present 2 cases demonstrating the roles of fluoroscopy and echocardiography in guiding TMVR placement within bioprostheses with radiolucent sewing rings. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Mitro-aortic valve-in-valve procedures: Many challenges in little space

Multiple valve replacements are known to carry additional risk of morbidity and mortality in redo context. Currently, a transcatheter-based valve-in-valve approach could be useful in reducing potential serious consequences. On the other hand, this approach poses several technical challenges regarding the device and the procedural aspects. We present the case of a 78-year-old man who presented with symptoms of heart failure due to mitral and aortic bioprosthesis degenerations who was deemed to be at extremely high risk for a conventional redo surgery. A two-step transcatheter-based approach was planned and a transfemoral aortic valve-in-valve procedure was followed by a transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation with a favorable early and long-term outcome.

Commissural fusion as etiology of bioprosthetic mitral stenosis in a patient with rheumatic heart disease

We report commissural fusion as a unique morphologic etiology of early bioprosthetic mitral valve failure in a woman with a history of rheumatic mitral stenosis. She had undergone mitral valve replacement with a 25-mm Edwards Magna Ease bovine pericardial bioprosthesis 3 years earlier and presented with progressive dyspnea. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed severe bioprosthetic stenosis due to commissural fusion. She underwent percutaneous valve-in-valve implantation with a 26-mm Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis. Marked symptomatic improvement was noted postprocedurally. We speculate that commissural fusion may be a unique pathologic feature of failing bioprosthetic valves in patients with prior rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Transcatheter Double Valve-in-Valve Replacement of Aortic and Mitral Bioprosthetic Valves

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an evolving method which has become the treatment of choice in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Unlike TAVR, the experience with transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) remains at an early stage because of challenges of valve development and possible complications such as valve displacement and subsequent left ventricular outlet tract (LVOT) obstruction. Here we report a case of transcatheter double valve-in-valve replacement (TDVIVR) in a patient with severe mitral and aortic bioprosthetic valve stenosis, followed by an extensive literature review of the latest techniques and challenges in this field.