Association of Autoimmune Vasculitis and Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Detection and modification of biomarkers of inflammation determining successful rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Growing evidence suggests that both local and systemic inflammation plays a key role even in early stages and its progression towards persisting and permanent AF. Rhythm control therapy via pulmonary vein isolation or cardioversion is the cornerstone of AF therapy for most symptomatic patients, yet arrhythmia recurrence after treatment is still common, especially in patients with persistent AF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge of biomarkers of inflammation with prognostic value in patients with atrial fibrillation as well as anti-inflammatory medication with potential benefits after rhythm control therapy.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Both onset of AF, progression and arrhythmia recurrence after rhythm control therapy can be caused by local and systemic inflammation. Various inflammatory biomarkers have been established to predict treatment success. Furthermore, additional anti-inflammatory therapy may significantly improve success rates.

COVID-19 HEART unveiling as atrial fibrillation: pathophysiology, management and future directions for research

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 infections are known to cause numerous systemic complications including cardiovascular disorders. In this regard, clinicians recently noticed that patients recovering from COVID-19 infections presented with diverse set of cardiovascular disorders in addition to those admitted to ICU (intensive care unit). COVID-19 heart has multifaceted presentation ranging from dysrhythmias, myocarditis, stroke, coronary artery disease, thromboembolism to heart failure. Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia among COVID-19 patients. In the background section, we briefly discussed epidemiology and spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias in COVID-19 patients.

MAIN BODY

In this state-of-the-art review we present here, we present the information regarding COVID-19-induced A-fib in sections, namely mechanism of action, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, its occurrence significantly increases the mortality and morbidity with a potential risk of complications such as cardiac arrest and sudden death. We included separate sections on complications including thromboembolism and ventricular arrhythmias. Since its mechanism is currently a gray area, we included a separate section on basic science research studies that are warranted in the future to comprehend its underlying pathogenic mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, this review builds upon the current literature of COVID-19-induced A-fib, including pathophysiology, clinical presentation, treatment and complications. Furthermore, it provides recommendations for future research moving forward that can open avenues for developing novel remedies that can prevent as well as hasten clinical recovery of atrial fibrillation in COVID-19 patients.

Association of atopic diseases with atrial fibrillation risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Atopic diseases and atrial fibrillation (AF) seem to share an underlying inflammatory pathology. To date, some population-based studies have explored the relationship between the two. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to examine the role of atopic condition in AF risk.

Methods

All relevant observational studies in PubMed and EMBASE databases up to November 2021 were searched. In RevMan 5.3, we used random-effects or fixed-effects models to pool the effect sizes of hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In addition, I² and Cochran Q test were used to evaluate the heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 2488 records were retrieved. After screening according to the predetermined criteria, 6 cohort studies and 2 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. Herein, the meta-analysis of 6 cohort studies suggested that atopic diseases potentially increased the AF risk with the pooled HR of 1.26 (95%CI,1.14–1.39), while the pooled effect size (OR, 1.04; 95%CI,0.74–1.46) of 2 case-control studies was not statistically significant. Based on the types of atopic diseases, further subgroup analyses of 6 cohort studies revealed that asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis all potentially increased the risk of subsequent AF with the pooled HR of 1.41 (n = 4; 95%CI, 1.25–1.58), 1.12 (n = 1; 95%CI,1.10–1.14) and 1.06 (n = 3; 95%CI, 1.01–1.12), respectively.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with atopic diseases have a higher risk of developing AF, particularly those with asthma.

Association of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and cardiovascular events: a population-based cohort study

Background

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) is implicated in elevating the risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease; whether the elevated risk applies to all types of CV diseases or specific types is unclear. This study examined the association of AAV and adverse CV outcomes compared with the non-AAV population.

Methods

We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of adults (mean age 61 years, 51% female) with a new diagnosis of AAV in Ontario, Canada from 2007 to 2017. Weighted models were used to examine the association of AAV (n = 1520) and CV events in a matched (1:4) control cohort (n = 5834). The main outcomes were major adverse CV events (MACE), defined as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or CV death, its components, atrial fibrillation (AF) and congestive heart failure (CHF).

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 3.8 years, AAV (compared with non-AAV) was associated with a higher risk of stroke: cumulative incidence 7.0% versus 5.2%, sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.49 [(95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.10–2.02]; AF: cumulative incidence 16.4% versus 11.5%, sHR 1.51, 95% CI 1.30–1.75; and CHF: cumulative incidence 20.8% versus 13.3%, sHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.22–1.62; but not for MACE, MI or CV death. The risks for all CV events, except CV death, were significantly elevated in the early period after AAV diagnosis, in particular AF (365-day sHR 2.06, 95% CI 1.71–2.48; 90-day sHR 3.33, 95% CI 2.66–4.18) and CHF (365-day sHR 1.75, 95% CI 1.48–2.07; 90-day sHR 2.65, 95% CI 2.15–3.26).

Conclusion

AAV is associated with a high risk of certain types of CV events, particularly in the early period following diagnosis.

Association of Autoimmune Vasculitis and Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Background

Recent investigations suggest that inflammation and autoimmunity might have a role in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). Given that abnormal ventriculovascular coupling often coexists with AF, we hypothesize that autoimmune vasculitis plays a significant role in the pathogenetic mechanism of AF.

Methods and Results

A standardized retrospective population‐based case–control study was conducted to evaluate the association between autoimmune vasculitis and AF, and all‐cause mortality. The study included 8459 patients with a new diagnosis of AF and 8459 age‐, sex‐, and registration calendar year–matched controls in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2010. The association of each clinical characteristic, diagnosis, and treatment was assessed using conditional logistic regression to account for the matched case–control study design. Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to detect independent predictors of mortality and examine cumulative survival. Of a total of 16 918 patients (mean age 72.3+14.4 years; 48.7% women), 320 (1.9%) were diagnosed with autoimmune vasculitis before the index date during the 30‐year period. Among the cases, the prevalence of any autoimmune vasculitis was 2.3%, whereas the frequency of autoimmune vasculitis in controls was 1.5% (P<0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of autoimmune vasculitis in AF cases was 1.5 times higher than in controls (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04–2.01; P=0.03). Patients with AF and autoimmune vasculitis had worse 5‐year survival than those without autoimmune vasculitis or AF (44.7% versus 77.2%; log‐rank P<0.001).

Conclusions

Autoimmune vasculitis is significantly associated with AF and independently confers worse survival. These observations may represent one mechanism linking autoimmunity and inflammation to the pathogenesis and prognosis of AF.