Sex and Race-Ethnic Disparities in Door-to-CT Time in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Florida Stroke Registry

Effects of Social Determinants of Health on Acute Stroke Care Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important contributors to poor stroke-related outcomes. While some have suggested that this association is driven by the increased incidence of stroke observed with poor SDOH, others have raised concerns regarding disparities in acute stroke care. This study aimed to determine the association between SDOH and the administration of thrombolytic therapy and mechanical thrombectomy among patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using Texas Emergency Department Public Use Data (2016-2019), including adult patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. The risk ratios (RRs) of administering thrombolysis and thrombectomy based on variables representing SDOH and a collective measure (Social Vulnerability Index [SVI]) were computed using mixed-effects Poisson regression models accounting for the nested nature of patients in hospitals and neighborhoods. The Charlson comorbidity score was considered as a covariate.

RESULTS

Of the 139,852 patients with ischemic stroke (female, 51.7%; White, 67.2%; Black, 16.6%; Hispanic, 25.1%), 16,831 (12.3%) received thrombolytic therapy and 5,951 (4.3%) received mechanical thrombectomy. Age older than 65 years (RR 0.578 [0.537-0.621]) vs 18-45 years, Black (RR 0.801 [0.761-0.844]) vs White, Hispanic (RR 0.936 [0.895-0.98]) vs non-Hispanic, Medicare/Medicaid/Veterans Affairs (VA) (RR 0.917 [0.882-0.954]) or uninsured (RR 0.883 [0.833-0.935]) vs private insurance, and rural (RR 0.782 [0.723-0.845]) vs urban dwelling were less likely to be associated with thrombolysis. Patients in the highest quintile based on the SVI were less likely to receive thrombolysis than those in the lowest quintile (RR 0.926 [0.867-0.989]). Patients were less likely to receive thrombectomy if they were 65 years and older (RR 0.787 [0.691-0.895]), belonged to the Black race (RR 0.745 [0.679-0.818]) or Hispanic ethnicity (RR 0.919 [0.851-0.992]), had Medicare/Medicaid/VA insurance (RR 0.909 [0.851-0.971]), or were from a rural area (RR 0.909 [0.851-0.971]). Similarly, SVI decreased the likelihood of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (RR 0.842 [0.747-0.95]).

DISCUSSION

Despite many improvements in stroke management, SDOH continue to be a significant driver of treatment access for acute ischemic stroke. While our findings are limited to Texas, our results should raise awareness and promote more studies regarding the effects of these SDOH at the national and international levels.

Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Critically Ill Adults with Acute Stroke

Racial, ethnicity and sex disparities are pervasive in the evaluation and acute care of ischemic stroke patients. Administration of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are the most critical steps in ischemic stroke treatment but compared to White patients, ischemic stroke patients from minority racial and ethnic groups are less likely to receive these potentially life-saving interventions. Sex and racial disparities in intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage treatment have not been well studied.

Sex differences in acute stroke metrics and outcome dependent on COVID status

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Biological sex is known to have an impact on quality metrics of acute stroke. We aimed to determine whether COVID positivity accentuates this effect and constitutes worse outcome.

METHODS

The present analysis was based on the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry, a retrospective, international, cohort study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2021. We investigated differences between the sexes in patient characteristics, acute stroke metrics as well as post-stroke outcome in COVID-positive and COVID-negative stroke patients undergoing acute revascularization procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 15,128 patients from 106 centers were recorded in the Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry, 853 (5.6%) of whom were COVID-positive. Overall, COVID-positive individuals were treated significantly slower according to every acute stroke metric compared to COVID-negative patients. We were able to show that key quality indicators in acute stroke treatment were unfavorable for COVID-negative women compared to men (last-seen-well-to-door time + 11 min in women). Furthermore, COVID-negative women had worse 3-month outcomes (3-month modified Rankin Scale score [interquartile range] 3.0 [4.0] vs. 2.0 [3.0]; p < 0.01), even after adjusting for confounders. In COVID-positive individuals no such difference between the sexes, either in acute management metrics or in 3-month outcome, was seen.

CONCLUSION

Known sex-related differences in acute stroke management exist and extend to times of crisis. Nevertheless, if patients were COVID-19-positive at stroke onset, women and men were treated the same, which could be attributed to structured treatment pathways.

Delays in receiving Alteplase and related factors in patients with stroke referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan-Iran in 2020-2021

BACKGROUND

The benefits of using Alteplase are time-dependent. This study aimed to evaluate delays between the onset of symptoms and the administration of Alteplase and related factors in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 60 AIS patients receiving Alteplase were selected by census sampling from July 2020 to July 2021 from the eligible patients referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan, Iran. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic information, time periods from the onset of symptoms to the injection of Alteplase, and associated factors. The required information was collected from the patients, their relatives, their health records, and Kashan Emergency Medical Service (EMS) information system. Data were analyzed in SPSS-16.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the 60 patients participating in the study were transferred to the hospital by EMS ambulances. The mean time intervals between different phases were as follows: Onset-To-Door (OTD) time 81.35 ± 33.76 minutes; Door-To-CT (DTC) scan time 16.12 ± 17.46 minutes; Door-To-Needle (DNT) time 51.30 ± 26.14 minutes; and the overall Onset-To-Needle (ONT) time 133.75 ± 39.17 minutes. Also, the mean ONT in people transferred by EMS was about 129 minutes, and the longest prehospital delay in these patients was related to the time between the arrival of the EMS ambulance to the hospital. Marital status and geographical location where the stroke had occurred showed a significant relationship with prehospital delay and pre-hospital notification (PHN) by EMS But there was no relationship between underlying diseases or economic status and prehospital delays; also, the patient's diastolic blood pressure at the time of receiving Alteplase showed a significant relationship with in-hospital delay.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the study showed that the majority of people trust and use EMS ambulances to transfer to the hospital and the time spent in different stages, from the onset of symptoms to the injection of the thrombolytic drug, was in an acceptable range in the patients.

Racial and ethnic disparities in the usage and outcomes of ischemic stroke treatment in the United States

OBJECTIVES

This study explores racial and ethnic differences in 1) receiving tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) as treatment for ischemic stroke and 2) outcomes and quality of care after use of tPA or EVT in the US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational analysis of 89,035 ischemic stroke patients from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample was conducted. We performed weighted logistic regressions between race and ethnicity and 1) tPA and EVT utilization and 2) in-hospital mortality. We also performed a weighted Poisson regression between race and ethnicity and length of stay (LOS) after tPA or EVT.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients had significantly lower odds of receiving tPA (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.85, 95 % Confidence Internal [C.I.]: 0.80-0.91) and EVT (AOR = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.70-0.82) than NH White patients. Minority populations (including but not limited to NH Black, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, Native American, and Asian) had significantly longer hospital LOS after treatment with tPA or EVT. We did not find a significant difference between race/ethnicity and in-hospital mortality post-tPA or EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

While we failed to find a difference in in-hospital mortality, racial and ethnic disparities are still evident in the decreased usage of tPA and EVT and longer LOSs for racial and ethnic minority patients. This study calls for interventions to expand the utilization of tPA and EVT and advance quality of care post-tPA or EVT in order to improve stroke care for minority patients.

Diagnostic error among vulnerable populations presenting to the emergency department with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular or neurological symptoms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic error (DE) is a common problem in clinical practice, particularly in the emergency department (ED) setting. Among ED patients presenting with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms, a delay in diagnosis or failure to hospitalise may be most impactful in terms of adverse outcomes. Minorities and other vulnerable populations may be at higher risk of DE. We aimed to systematically review studies reporting the frequency and causes of DE in under-resourced patients presenting to the ED with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms.

METHODS

We searched EBM Reviews, Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science from 2000 through 14 August 2022. Data were abstracted by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Of the 7342 studies screened, we included 20 studies evaluating 7436,737 patients. Most studies were conducted in the USA, and one study was multicountry. 11 studies evaluated DE in patients with cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms, 8 studies with cardiovascular symptoms and 1 study examined both types of symptoms. 13 studies investigated missed diagnoses and 7 studies explored delayed diagnoses. There was significant clinical and methodological variability, including heterogeneity of DE definitions and predictor variable definitions as well as methods of DE assessment, study design and reporting.Among the studies evaluating cardiovascular symptoms, black race was significantly associated with higher odds of DE in 4/6 studies evaluating missed acute myocardial infarction (AMI)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis compared with white race (OR from 1.18 (1.12-1.24) to 4.5 (1.8-11.8)). The association between other analysed factors (ethnicity, insurance and limited English proficiency) and DE in this domain varied from study to study and was inconclusive.Among the studies evaluating DE in patients with cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms, no consistent association was found indicating higher or lower odds of DE. Although some studies showed significant differences, these were not consistently in the same direction.The overall ROB was low for most included studies; however, the certainty of evidence was very low, mostly due to serious inconsistency in definitions and measurement approaches across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated consistent increased odds of missed AMI/ACS diagnosis among black patients presenting to the ED compared with white patients in most studies. No consistent associations between demographic groups and DE related to cerebrovascular/neurological diagnoses were identified. More standardised approaches to study design, measurement of DE and outcomes assessment are needed to understand this problem among vulnerable populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178885 and is available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020178885.

Determinants and Temporal Trends of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Mild Noncardioembolic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces early stroke recurrence after mild noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (NCIS). We aim to evaluate temporal trends and determinants of DAPT prescription after mild NCIS in the Florida Stroke Registry, a statewide registry across Get With The Guidelines-Stroke participating hospitals.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study, we included patients with mild NCIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤3) who were potentially eligible for DAPT across 168 Florida Stroke Registry participating hospitals between January 2010 and September 2022. Using antiplatelet prescription as the dependent variable (DAPT versus single antiplatelet therapy), we fit logistic regression models adjusted for patient-related factors, hospital-related factors, clinical presentation, vascular risk factors, and ischemic stroke subtype, to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

From 283 264 Florida Stroke Registry ischemic stroke patients during the study period, 109 655 NCIS were considered eligible. Among these, 37 058 patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >3 were excluded, resulting in a sample of 72 597 mild NCIS (mean age 68±14 years; female 47.3%). Overall, 24 693 (34.0%) patients with mild NCIS were discharged on DAPT and 47 904 (66.0%) on single antiplatelet therapy. DAPT prescription increased from 25.7% in 2010 to 52.8% in 2022 (β/year 2.5% [95% CI, 1.5%-3.4%]). Factors associated with DAPT prescription were premorbid antiplatelet therapy (aOR, 4.66 [95% CI, 2.20-9.88]), large-artery atherosclerosis (aOR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.97]), diabetes (aOR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.13-1.47]), and hyperlipidemia (aOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.39]), whereas female sex (aOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.93]), being non-Hispanic Black patients (compared with non-Hispanic White patients; aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.90]), admission to a Thrombectomy-capable Stroke Center (compared with Comprehensive Stroke Center; aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]), time-to-presentation 1 to 7 days from last seen well (compared with <24 h; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]), and small-vessel disease stroke (aOR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94]) were associated with not receiving DAPT at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a temporal trend increase in DAPT prescription after mild NCIS, we found substantial underutilization of evidence-based DAPT associated with significant disparities in stroke care.

Disparities in transitions of acute stroke care: The transitions of care stroke disparities study methodological report

OBJECTIVE

The Transitions of Stroke Care Disparities Study (TCSD-S) is an observational study designed to determine race-ethnic and sex disparities in post-hospital discharge transitions of stroke care and stroke outcomes and to develop hospital-level initiatives to reduce these disparities to improve stroke outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here, we present the study rationale, describe the methodology, report preliminary outcomes, and discuss a critical need for the development, implementation, and dissemination of interventions for successful post-hospital transition of stroke care. The preliminary outcomes describe the demographic, stroke risk factor, socioeconomic, and acute care characteristics of eligible participants by race-ethnicity and sex. We also report on all-cause and vascular-related death, readmissions, and hospital/emergency room representations at 30- and 90-days after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The preliminary sample included data from 1048 ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage discharged from 10 comprehensive stroke centers across the state of Florida. The overall sample was 45% female, 22% Non-Hispanic Black and 21% Hispanic participants, with an average age of 64 ± 14 years. All cause death, readmissions, or hospital/emergency room representations are 10% and 19% at 30 and 90 days, respectively. One in 5 outcomes was vascular-related.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the transition from stroke hospitalization as an area in need for considerable improvement in systems of care for stroke patients discharged from hospital. Results from our preliminary analysis highlight the importance of investigating race-ethnic and sex differences in post-stroke outcomes.

Door-in-Door-out Times for Interhospital Transfer of Patients With Stroke

Importance

Treatments for time-sensitive acute stroke are not available at every hospital, often requiring interhospital transfer. Current guidelines recommend hospitals achieve a door-in-door-out time of no more than 120 minutes at the transferring emergency department (ED).

Objective

To evaluate door-in-door-out times for acute stroke transfers in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry and to identify patient and hospital factors associated with door-in-door-out times.

Design, Setting, and Participants

US registry-based, retrospective study of patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke from January 2019 through December 2021 who were transferred from the ED at registry-affiliated hospitals to other acute care hospitals.

Exposure

Patient- and hospital-level characteristics.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the door-in-door-out time (time of transfer out minus time of arrival to the transferring ED) as a continuous variable and a categorical variable (≤120 minutes, >120 minutes). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to identify patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with door-in-door-out time overall and in subgroups of patients with hemorrhagic stroke, acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy, and acute ischemic stroke transferred for reasons other than endovascular therapy.

Results

Among 108 913 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [15.2] years; 71.7% non-Hispanic White; 50.6% male) transferred from 1925 hospitals, 67 235 had acute ischemic stroke and 41 678 had hemorrhagic stroke. Overall, the median door-in-door-out time was 174 minutes (IQR, 116-276 minutes): 29 741 patients (27.3%) had a door-in-door-out time of 120 minutes or less. The factors significantly associated with longer median times were age 80 years or older (vs 18-59 years; 14.9 minutes, 95% CI, 12.3 to 17.5 minutes), female sex (5.2 minutes; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.9 minutes), non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White (8.2 minutes, 95% CI, 5.7 to 10.8 minutes), and Hispanic ethnicity vs non-Hispanic White (5.4 minutes, 95% CI, 1.8 to 9.0 minutes). The following were significantly associated with shorter median door-in-door-out time: emergency medical services prenotification (-20.1 minutes; 95% CI, -22.1 to -18.1 minutes), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score exceeding 12 vs a score of 0 to 1 (-66.7 minutes; 95% CI, -68.7 to -64.7 minutes), and patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy vs the hemorrhagic stroke subgroup (-16.8 minutes; 95% CI, -21.0 to -12.7 minutes). Among patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy, female sex, Black race, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with a significantly higher door-in-door-out time, whereas emergency medical services prenotification, intravenous thrombolysis, and a higher NIHSS score were associated with significantly lower door-in-door-out times.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this US registry-based study of interhospital transfer for acute stroke, the median door-in-door-out time was 174 minutes, which is longer than current recommendations for acute stroke transfer. Disparities and modifiable health system factors associated with longer door-in-door-out times are suitable targets for quality improvement initiatives.

Women With Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke Are Less Likely to Be Routed to Comprehensive Stroke Centers

Background Prehospital routing of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to centers capable of performing endovascular therapy may improve clinical outcomes. Here, we explore whether distance to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs), stroke severity, and sex are associated with direct-to-CSC prehospital routing in patients with LVO AIS. Methods and Results In this cross-sectional study, we identified consecutive patients with LVO AIS from a prospectively collected multihospital registry throughout the greater Houston area from January 2019 to June 2020. Primary outcome was prehospital routing to CSC and was compared between men and women using modified Poisson regression including age, sex, race or ethnicity, first in-hospital National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, travel time, and distances to the closest primary stroke center and CSC. Among 503 patients with LVO AIS, 413 (82%) were routed to CSCs, and women comprised 46% of the study participants. Women with LVO AIS compared with men were older (73 versus 65, P<0.01) and presented with greater National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (14 versus 12, P=0.01). In modified Poisson regression, women were 9% less likely to be routed to CSCs compared with men (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.91 [0.84-0.99], P=0.024) and distance to nearest CSC ≤10 miles was associated with 38% increased chance of routing to CSC (aRR, 1.38 [1.26-1.52], P<0.001). Conclusions Despite presenting with more significant stroke syndromes and living within comparable distance to CSCs, women with LVO AIS were less likely to be routed to CSCs compared with men. Further study of the mechanisms behind this disparity is needed.

Emergency Medical Services Prenotification is Associated with Reduced Odds of In-Hospital Mortality in Stroke Patients

Objective: Arrival by emergency medical services (EMS) and prenotification among ischemic stroke patients is well-established to improve the timeliness and quality of stroke care, yet the association of prenotification with in-hospital mortality has not been previously described. Our cross-sectional study aimed to assess the association between EMS prenotification and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.Methods: We analyzed data from the Massachusetts Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program registry. Our study population included adult patients presenting by EMS with transient ischemic attack or acute ischemic stroke from non-health care settings between 2016 and 2020. We excluded patients who were comfort measures only on arrival or day after arrival. We used generalized estimating equations to assess the association between prenotification and in-hospital stroke mortality.Results: In the adjusted model, prenotification was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.98). Other variables associated with in-hospital mortality were longer door-to-imaging interval (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.03-1.04) and year of presentation (OR 0.91 for each year, 95% CI 0.88-0.93). Odds of in-hospital mortality also varied by insurance, race, and ethnicity.Conclusions: Prenotification by EMS was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. These findings add to the large body of literature demonstrating the key role of EMS in the stroke systems of care. Our study underscores the importance of standardizing prehospital screening and triage, increasing rates of prenotification via feedback and education, and encouraging active collaborations between prehospital personnel and stroke-capable hospitals to increase in-hospital survival among patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Your neighborhood matters: A machine-learning approach to the geospatial and social determinants of health in 9-1-1 activated chest pain

Healthcare disparities in the initial management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) exist. Yet, the complexity of interactions between demographic, social, economic, and geospatial determinants of health hinders incorporating such predictors in existing risk stratification models. We sought to explore a machine-learning-based approach to study the complex interactions between the geospatial and social determinants of health to explain disparities in ACS likelihood in an urban community. This study identified consecutive patients transported by Pittsburgh emergency medical service for a chief complaint of chest pain or ACS-equivalent symptoms. We extracted demographics, clinical data, and location coordinates from electronic health records. Median income was based on US census data by zip code. A random forest (RF) classifier and a regularized logistic regression model were used to identify the most important predictors of ACS likelihood. Our final sample included 2400 patients (age 59 ± 17 years, 47% Females, 41% Blacks, 15.8% adjudicated ACS). In our RF model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 ± 0.03) age, prior revascularization, income, distance from hospital, and residential neighborhood were the most important predictors of ACS likelihood. In regularized regression (akaike information criterion = 1843, bayesian information criterion = 1912, χ²  = 193, df = 10, p < 0.001), residential neighborhood remained a significant and independent predictor of ACS likelihood. Findings from our study suggest that residential neighborhood constitutes an upstream factor to explain the observed healthcare disparity in ACS risk prediction, independent from known demographic, social, and economic determinants of health, which can inform future work on ACS prevention, in-hospital care, and patient discharge.

Sex and Race-Ethnic Disparities in Door-to-CT Time in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Florida Stroke Registry

Background

Less than 40% of acute stroke patients have computed tomography (CT) imaging performed within 25 minutes of hospital arrival. We aimed to examine the race‐ethnic and sex differences in door‐to‐CT (DTCT) ≤25 minutes in the FSR (Florida Stroke Registry).

Methods and Results

Data were collected from 2010 to 2018 for 63 265 patients with acute ischemic stroke from the FSR and secondary analysis was performed on 15 877 patients with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator‐treated ischemic stroke. Generalized estimating equation models were used to determine predictors of DTCT ≤25. DTCT ≤25 was achieved in 56% of cases of suspected acute stroke, improving from 36% in 2010 to 72% in 2018. Women (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87–0.93) and Black (OR, 0.88; CI, 0.84–0.94) patients who had strokes were less likely, and Hispanic patients more likely (OR, 1.07; CI, 1.01–1.14), to achieve DTCT ≤25. In a secondary analysis among intravenous tissue plasminogen activator‐treated patients, 81% of patients achieved DTCT ≤25. In this subgroup, women were less likely to receive DTCT ≤25 (0.85, 0.77–0.94) whereas no significant differences were observed by race or ethnicity.

Conclusions

In the FSR, there was considerable improvement in acute stroke care metric DTCT ≤25 in 2018 in comparison to 2010. However, sex and race‐ethnic disparities persist and require further efforts to improve performance and reduce these disparities.