Independent Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Prognostic impact of peripheral artery disease-related parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and increased aortic stiffness are associated with higher mortality in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, while their prognostic significance after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is less known.

METHODS

We analyzed prevalence, clinical phenotypes and association of LEAD - assessed by the ankle-brachial index (ABI) - and increased aortic stiffness - assessed by the aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) - with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients admitted with an ACS.

RESULTS

Among 270 patients admitted for ACS (mean age 67 years, 80% males), 41 (15%) had an ABI ≤0.9, with 14 of them (34%) presenting with intermittent claudication (symptomatic LEAD). Patients with symptomatic LEAD, compared with those with asymptomatic LEAD or without LEAD, had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Patients with LEAD, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, more frequently presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and more frequently had multivessel coronary artery disease. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic LEAD were significantly associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for confounders, including multivessel disease or carotid artery disease (hazard ratio 4.03, 95% confidence interval 1.61-10.08, P  < 0.01), whereas PWV was not associated with the outcome in the univariable model. LEAD and PWV were not associated with a higher risk of MACE (myocardial infarction or unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischemic attack).

CONCLUSIONS

LEAD, either clinical or subclinical, but not increased aortic stiffness, is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients admitted for ACS.

Angiographic Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Impella-Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the cVAD PROTECT III Study

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have found that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have worse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There are no data about patients with advanced CKD undergoing Impella-supported high-risk PCI. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate angiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with CKD who received Impella-supported high-risk PCI as part of the catheter-based ventricular assist device PROTECT III study (A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial of the IMPELLA RECOVER LP 2.5 System Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump [IABP] in Patients Undergoing Non Emergent High Risk PCI).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the PROTECT III study were analyzed according to their baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The primary outcome was 90-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and repeat revascularization).

RESULTS

Of 1237 enrolled patients, 1052 patients with complete eGFR baseline assessment were evaluated: 586 with eGFR ≥60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 190 with eGFR ≥45 to <60, 105 with eGFR ≥30 to <45, and 171 with eGFR <30 or on dialysis. Patients with lower eGFR (all groups with eGFR <60) were more frequently females and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, anemia, and peripheral artery disease. The baseline Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score was similar between groups (28.2±12.6 for all groups). Patients with lower eGFR were more likely to have severe coronary calcifications and higher usage of atherectomy. There were no differences in individual PCI-related coronary complications between groups, but the rates of overall PCI complications were less frequent among patients with lower eGFR. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 90 days and 1-year mortality were significantly higher among patients with eGFR <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or on dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced CKD undergoing Impella-assisted high-risk PCI tend to have higher baseline comorbidities, severe coronary calcification, and higher atherectomy usage, yet CKD was not associated with a higher rate of immediate PCI-related complications. However, 90-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and 1-year mortality were significantly higher among patients with eGFR<30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or on dialysis. Future studies of strategies to improve intermediate and long-term outcomes of these high-risk patients are warranted.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04136392.

Ticagrelor with or without aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease: A subgroup analysis of the TWILIGHT randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal antiplatelet regimen after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is still debated. This analysis aimed to compare the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with PAD undergoing PCI.

METHODS

In the TWILIGHT trial, patients at high ischemic or bleeding risk that underwent PCI were randomized after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to aspirin or matching placebo in addition to open-label ticagrelor for 12 additional months. In this post-hoc analysis, patient cohorts were examined according to the presence or absence of PAD. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The key secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Endpoints were assessed at 12 months after randomization.

RESULTS

Among 7,119 patients, 489 (7%) had PAD and were older, more likely to have comorbidities, and multivessel disease. PAD patients had more bleeding or ischemic complications than no-PAD patients. Ticagrelor monotherapy compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with less BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding in PAD (4.6% vs 8.7%; HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.25-1.07) and no-PAD patients (4.0% vs 7.0%; HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.45-0.69; interaction P-value .830) and a similar risk of death, MI, or stroke in these 2 groups (interaction P-value .446).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their higher ischemic and bleeding risk, patients with PAD undergoing PCI derived a consistent benefit from ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT in terms of bleeding reduction without any relevant increase in ischemic events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY INFORMATION:: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/study/NCT02270242.

Sarcopenia in peripheral arterial disease: Establishing and validating a predictive nomogram based on clinical and computed tomography angiography indicators

Purpose

To establish, validate, and clinically evaluate a nomogram for predicting the risk of sarcopenia in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) based on clinical and lower extremity computed tomography angiography (LE-CTA) imaging characteristics.

Methods

Clinical data and CTA imaging features from 281 PAD patients treated between January 1, 2019, and May 1, 2023, at two hospitals were retrospectively analyzed using binary logistic regression to identify the independent risk factors for sarcopenia. These identified risk factors were used to develop a predictive nomogram. The nomogram's effectiveness was assessed through various metrics, including the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), concordance index (C-index), Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, and calibration curve. Its clinical utility was demonstrated using decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Several key independent risk factors for sarcopenia in PAD patients were identified, namely age, body mass index (BMI), history of coronary heart disease (CHD), and white blood cell (WBC) count, as well as the severity of luminal stenosis (P < 0.05). The discriminative ability of the nomogram was supported by the C-index and an AUC of 0.810 (95% confidence interval: 0.757-0.862). A robust concordance between predicted and observed outcomes was reflected by the calibration curve. The HL test further affirmed the model's calibration with a P-value of 0.40. The DCA curve validated the nomogram's favorable clinical utility. Lastly, the model underwent internal validation.

Conclusions

A simple nomogram based on five independent factors, namely age, BMI, history of CHD, WBC count, and the severity of luminal stenosis, was developed to assist clinicians in estimating sarcopenia risk among PAD patients. This tool boasts impressive predictive capabilities and broad utility, significantly aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk individuals and enhancing the prognosis of PAD patients.

Prognostic impact of peripheral artery disease in patients with and without high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of PAD according to high bleeding risk (HBR) status.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation at a tertiary-care center (Mount Sinai Hospital) between 2012 and 2019 were stratified according to HBR and PAD status. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke 1 year after PCI. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding.

RESULTS

Out of 16,750 patients, 43% were HBR and 57% were no-HBR. Within the two groups, PAD patients were 14% and 6%, respectively, and were more likely to have comorbidities and to undergo complex PCI than no-PAD patients. Within the HBR group, PAD was associated with an increased risk of MACE (11.4% vs. 7.3%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.99, p < 0.001) and a numerical nonsignificant increase of major bleeding (8.5% vs. 6.9%, HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.98-1.59, p = 0.066) as compared with no-PAD. Among no-HBR patients, rates of MACE and major bleeding were numerically but not significantly higher in the PAD group. After multivariable adjustment, PAD was no longer a predictor of adverse outcomes, irrespective of HBR status.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1-year after PCI, PAD was associated with increased 1-year risks of MACE in HBR patients. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, the effect of PAD on adverse events was largely attenuated.

Prognostic Significance of Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) elevates the risk of adverse outcomes. The current work aimed to evaluate the influence of PAD in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) cases administered percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to determine whether PAD adds incremental prognostic value to the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) scale.

Methods

To retrospectively analyze a single-center, prospective cohort trial, we consecutively included ACS cases administered PCI. Individuals with and without PAD were comparatively examined for clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a compound item encompassing all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and repeat revascularization. The added value of PAD based on a reference model was examined.

Results

PAD was detected in 179 (10.4%) of the 1,770 included patients. The incidence rates of MACEs (40.3% vs. 17.9%), all-cause death (11.2% vs. 1.6%), cardiovascular death (8.9% vs. 1.4%), MI (8.4% vs. 2.2%) and repeat revascularization (30.2% vs. 15.2%) were all markedly elevated in PAD cases in comparison with the non-PAD group (p < 0.001). After adjusting for other confounding variates, PAD independently predicted MACE occurrence (hazard ratio = 1.735, 95% confidence interval: 1.281-2.351). Addition of PAD resulted in remarkably increased predictive performance for MACE compared to the baseline GRACE score (Harrell's C-statistic: 0.610 vs. 0.587, p < 0.001; net reclassification improvement: 0.134, p < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.035, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In ACS cases administered PCI, PAD independently worsens clinical outcomes and adds incremental value to the GRACE risk score.

The Impact of Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes Following ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the leading cause of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related mortality. Contemporary studies have shown no sex-related differences in mortality.

METHODS

STEMI-CS patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) were included based on a dedicated prospective STEMI database. We compared sex-specific differences in CS characteristics at baseline, during hospitalization, and in subsequent clinical outcomes. Endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

Of 3202 consecutive STEMI patients, 210 (6.5%) had CS, of which 63 (30.0%) were women. Women were older than men (73.2 vs. 65.5% y, p < 0.01), and more had hypertension (68.3 vs. 52.8%, p = 0.019) and diabetes (38.7 vs. 24.8%, p = 0.047). Fewer were smokers (13.3 vs. 41.2%, p < 0.01), had previous PCI (9.1 vs. 22.3% p = 0.016), or required IABP (35.3 vs. 51.1% p = 0.027). Women had higher rates of mortality (53.2 vs. 35.3% in-hospital, p = 0.01; 61.3 vs. 41.9% at 1 month, p = 0.01; and 73.8 vs. 52.6% at 3 years, p = 0.05) and MACE (60.6 vs. 41.6% in-hospital, p = 0.032; 66.1 vs. 45.6% at 1 month, p = 0.007; and 62.9 vs. 80.3% at 3 years, p = 0.015). After multivariate adjustment, female sex remained an independent factor for death (HR-2.42 [95% CI 1.014-5.033], p = 0.042) and MACE (HR-1.91 [95% CI 1.217-3.031], p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CS complicating STEMI is associated with greater short- and long-term mortality and MACE in women. Sex-focused measures to improve diagnosis and treatment are mandatory for CS patients.

Life-threatening subclavian artery bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are rare and usually occur at the access site below the elbow. Life-threatening vascular complications during transradial PCI therapy, such as vessel perforation and dissection in the brachiocephalic, subclavian, internal mammary, and thyrocervical arteries, are rarely reported. Subclavian artery bleeding is a potentially serious complication of vascular interventional procedures leading to tracheal obstruction, hemothorax, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic shock, and death if not diagnosed early and treated promptly.

CASE SUMMARY

A male patient with typical angina pectoris underwent coronary angiography and stent implantation. During the procedure, the patient felt pharyngeal pain and tightness, which we mistook for myocardial ischemia. After PCI, swelling in the right neck and supraclavicular area was observed. The patient experienced dyspnea, emergency endotracheal intubation was performed, and then a sudden drop in blood pressure was observed. Ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans demonstrated a cervical hematoma severely compressing the trachea due to subclavian artery bleeding. Brachiocephalic angiography revealed a vascular injury site at the root of the right subclavian artery at the intersection of the right common carotid artery. A covered stent was deployed to the right subclavian artery with successful sealing of the perforation, and a bare stent was implanted in the junction of the right common carotid and brachiocephalic arteries to prevent obstruction of blood flow to the brain.

CONCLUSION

Subclavian artery bleeding is a lifethreatening complication of PCI. Early prevention, rapid recognition, and prompt treatment may improve the prognosis.

Independent Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, in some studies PAD is not an independent risk factor. We sought to examine the independent impact of PAD on a large prospective percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

Methods and Results

From our single‐center prospective percutaneous coronary intervention registry, we have retrospectively analyzed 25 690 patients (years 2004–2018). We examined the influence of PAD on short‐ and long‐term outcomes using both regression and propensity‐matched analyses. Patients with documented PAD (n=1610, 6.3% of total) were older (66.7±10.8 versus 65.4±12.1, P<0.01), had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (69.3% versus 46.3%, P<0.01), hypertension (92.1% versus 76.1%, P<0.01) and renal failure (38.3% versus 18.2%, P<0.01). There were no differences in the rates of stable versus acute presentations, but less were treated with Prasugrel and Ticagrelor (3.3% versus 8.0% and 7.9% versus 11.9%, respectively, P<0.001 for both). Both 30‐day and 3‐year rates of all‐cause death and major adverse cardiac events were higher for patients with PAD versus control (4.9% versus 2.1% and 7.3% versus 3.3% death and major adverse cardiac events at 30 days, respectively; 43.4% versus 29.0% and 55.0% versus 37.8%, respectively at 3 years, P<0.001 for all). Following multivariate analysis, the presence of PAD was associated with a higher risk of both death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; CI 1.52–1.83; P<0.001) and major adverse cardiac events (HR, 1.51; CI, 1.40–1.64; P<0.001).

Conclusions

PAD constitutes an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Further studies are needed to ascertain which effective therapies may mitigate this risk.