Treatment Intensification for Elevated Blood Pressure and Risk of Recurrent Stroke

Learning implementation of a guideline based decision support system to improve hypertension treatment in primary care in China: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in improving the use of guideline accordant antihypertensive treatment in primary care settings in China.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, open label, cluster randomised trial.

SETTING

94 primary care practices in four urban regions of China between August 2019 and July 2022: Luoyang (central China), Jining (east China), and Shenzhen (south China, including two regions).

PARTICIPANTS

94 practices were randomised (46 to CDSS, 48 to usual care). 12 137 participants with hypertension who used up to two classes of antihypertensives and had a systolic blood pressure <180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Primary care practices were randomised to use an electronic health record based CDSS, which recommended a specific guideline accordant regimen for initiation, titration, or switching of antihypertensive (the intervention), or to use the same electronic health record without CDSS and provide treatment as usual (control).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of hypertension related visits during which an appropriate (guideline accordant) treatment was provided. Secondary outcomes were the average reduction in systolic blood pressure and proportion of participants with controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last scheduled follow-up. Safety outcomes were patient reported antihypertensive treatment related events, including syncope, injurious fall, symptomatic hypotension or systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and bradycardia.

RESULTS

5755 participants with 23 113 visits in the intervention group and 6382 participants with 27 868 visits in the control group were included. Mean age was 61 (standard deviation 13) years and 42.5% were women. During a median 11.6 months of follow-up, the proportion of visits at which appropriate treatment was given was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (77.8% (17 975/23 113) v 62.2% (17 328/27 868); absolute difference 15.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.7 to 19.8); P<0.001; odds ratio 2.17 (95% CI 1.75 to 2.69); P<0.001). Compared with participants in the control group, those in the intervention group had a 1.6 mm Hg (95% CI -2.7 to -0.5) greater reduction in systolic blood pressure (-1.5 mm Hg v 0.3 mm Hg; P=0.006) and a 4.4 percentage point (95% CI -0.7 to 9.5) improvement in blood pressure control rate (69.0% (3415/4952) v 64.6% (3778/5845); P=0.07). Patient reported antihypertensive treatment related adverse effects were rare in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a CDSS in primary care in China improved the provision of guideline accordant antihypertensive treatment and led to a modest reduction in blood pressure. The CDSS offers a promising approach to delivering better care for hypertension, both safely and efficiently.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03636334.

Predictors of treatment intensification in uncontrolled hypertension

PURPOSE

Prior studies have shown that treatment intensification for patients presenting with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) rarely occurs, even during visits to the patient's own primary care physicians (PCPs). In this article, we identified predictors of treatment intensification for uncontrolled HTN.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using nationally representative survey data on visits by patients aged 18 or above with uncontrolled HTN, defined as a recorded SBP at least 140 and/or a DBP at least 90 using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 2008-2018. Our outcome is treatment intensification defined as the addition of a new blood pressure medication.

RESULTS

We analyzed 22 559 visits to PCPs where uncontrolled HTN was noted, representing 801 023 786 visits nationally. Among these encounters, 2138 (10.3%) of the visits resulted in treatment intensification. Visits with the patient's own PCP had higher rates of treatment intensification than visits to another PCP (10.8 vs. 5.9%, P  < 0.0001). Visits for patients previously on antihypertensive medications had lower rates of treatment intensification (11% for no medications, 10.4% for one medication, 6.6% for ≥2 medications, P  < 0.0001), but there were no statistically significant differences in rates of intensification for those with relevant comorbidities (9.4% for no chronic conditions, 10.8% for one to two chronic conditions, 8.9% for at least three chronic conditions, P  = 0.12). Multivariable adjusted results were similar to the unadjusted findings.

CONCLUSION

Visits for patients with uncontrolled HTN rarely result in treatment intensification. Substantial opportunity exists to improve management of HTN, particularly for patients on fewer medications or seen by a covering provider.

[Optimizing blood pressure control through telemedicine in Primary Care in Spain (Iniciativa Óptima): Results from a Delphi study]

Objetivo

Representantes de los grupos de trabajo de hipertensión o enfermedad cardiovascular de las Sociedades Españolas de Médicos de Atención Primaria (MAP) [SEMERGEN], de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria [semFYC] y de Médicos Generales y de Familia [SEMG] realizaron un estudio Delphi para validar con un panel de MAP expertos en hipertensión una propuesta de recomendaciones para optimizar la teleconsulta en pacientes hipertensos.

Materiales y métodos

Estudio Delphi basado en un cuestionario online con 59 recomendaciones, elaborado en base a la bibliografía relacionada disponible y a la experiencia clínica aportada por los autores.

Resultados

Un total de 118 MAP participaron en dos rondas del cuestionario (98,3% de los invitados), alcanzándose el consenso en 53/62 sentencias (85%). El equipo de Atención Primaria debe seleccionar a los pacientes hipertensos candidatos a realizar la consulta telemática proactivamente, informando de la cita con antelación. Al iniciar la consulta telemática, se recomienda explicar el motivo y los objetivos de la misma, y realizar la anamnesis preguntando por signos y síntomas de empeoramiento de la enfermedad, tratamientos actuales y adherencia a los mismos. En pacientes con una automedida de la presión arterial (AMPA) ≤ 135/85 mmHg se recomienda pautar una nueva cita telemática en 3-6 meses. Por el contrario, en pacientes asintomáticos que reporten una AMPA ≥ 135/85 mmHg se recomienda la monitorización ambulatoria de la presión arterial, modificar el tratamiento, o derivar al paciente a visita presencial o al hospital en caso de signos o síntomas de alarma.

Conclusiones

La teleconsulta puede complementar la consulta presencial, constituyendo un elemento más a tener en cuenta para el adecuado control de los pacientes hipertensos.

Tracking Blood Pressure Control Performance and Process Metrics in 25 US Health Systems: The PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory

Background The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network Blood Pressure Control Laboratory Surveillance System was established to identify opportunities for blood pressure (BP) control improvement and to provide a mechanism for tracking improvement longitudinally. Methods and Results We conducted a serial cross-sectional study with queries against standardized electronic health record data in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) common data model returned by 25 participating US health systems. Queries produced BP control metrics for adults with well-documented hypertension and a recent encounter at the health system for a series of 1-year measurement periods for each quarter of available data from January 2017 to March 2020. Aggregate weighted results are presented overall and by race and ethnicity. The most recent measurement period includes data from 1 737 995 patients, and 11 956 509 patient-years were included in the trend analysis. Overall, 15% were Black, 52% women, and 28% had diabetes. BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was observed in 62% (range, 44%-74%) but varied by race and ethnicity, with the lowest BP control among Black patients at 57% (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94). A new class of antihypertensive medication (medication intensification) was prescribed in just 12% (range, 0.6%-25%) of patient visits where BP was uncontrolled. However, when medication intensification occurred, there was a large decrease in systolic BP (≈15 mm Hg; range, 5-18 mm Hg). Conclusions Major opportunities exist for improving BP control and reducing disparities, especially through consistent medication intensification when BP is uncontrolled. These data demonstrate substantial room for improvement and opportunities to close health equity gaps.

Treatment Intensification for Elevated Blood Pressure and Risk of Recurrent Stroke

Background

It remains unclear whether physicians' attitudes toward timely management of elevated blood pressure affect the risk of stroke recurrence.

Methods and Results

From a multicenter stroke registry database, we identified 2933 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to participating centers in 2011, survived at the 1‐year follow‐up period, and returned to outpatient clinics ≥2 times after discharge. As a surrogate measure of physicians' attitude, individual treatment intensification (TI) scores were calculated by dividing the difference between the frequencies of observed and expected medication changes by the frequency of clinic visits and categorizing them into 5 groups. The association between TI groups and the recurrence of stroke within 1 year was analyzed using hierarchical frailty models, with adjustment for clustering within each hospital and relevant covariates. Mean±SD of the TI score was −0.13±0.28. The TI score groups were significantly associated with increased risk of recurrent stroke compared with Group 3 (TI score range, −0.25 to 0); Group 1 (range, −1 to −0.5), adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 13.43 (95% CI, 5.95–30.35); Group 2 (range, −0.5 to −0.25), adjusted HR 4.59 (95% CI, 2.01–10.46); and Group 4 (TI score 0), adjusted HR 6.60 (95% CI, 3.02–14.45); but not with Group 5 (range, 0–1), adjusted HR 1.68 (95% CI, 0.62–4.56). This elevated risk in the lowest TI score groups persisted when confining analysis to those with hypertension, history of blood pressure‐lowering medication, no atrial fibrillation, and regular clinic visits and stratifying the subjects by functional capacity at discharge.

Conclusions

A low TI score, which implies physicians' therapeutic inertia in blood pressure management, was associated with a higher risk of recurrent stroke. The TI score may be a useful performance indicator in the outpatient clinic setting to prevent recurrent stroke.