Prognostic Importance of Pulmonary Arterial Capacitance in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Afterload-related cardiac performance is a powerful hemodynamic predictor of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure

Background

Afterload-related cardiac performance (ACP), a diagnostic parameter for septic cardiomyopathy, integrates both cardiac performance and vascular effects and could predict prognosis in septic shock.

Objectives

We hypothesized that ACP would also correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).

Design

A retrospective study.

Methods

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with chronic HF who underwent right heart catheterization and established an expected cardiac output-systemic vascular resistance (CO-SVR) curve model in chronic HF for the first time. ACP was calculated as COmeasured/COpredicted × 100%. ACP > 80%, 60% < ACP ⩽ 80%, and ACP ⩽ 60% represented less impaired, mildly impaired, and severely impaired cardiovascular function, respectively. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was event-free survival.

Results

A total of 965 individual measurements from 290 eligible patients were used to establish the expected CO-SVR curve model (COpredicted = 53.468 × SVR -0.799). Patients with ACP ⩽ 60% had higher serum NT-proBNP levels (P < 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.001), and required dopamine more frequently (P < 0.001). Complete follow-up data were available in 263 of 290 patients (90.7%). After multivariate adjustment, ACP remained associated with both primary outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 0.956, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.927-0.987) and secondary outcome (HR 0.977, 95% CI 0.963-0.992). Patients with ACP ⩽ 60% had the worst prognosis (all P < 0.001). ACP was significantly more discriminating (area under the curve of 0.770) than other conventional hemodynamic parameters in predicting mortality (Delong test, all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

ACP is a powerful independent hemodynamic predictor of mortality in patients with chronic HF. ACP and the novel CO-SVR two-dimensional graph could be useful in assessing cardiovascular function and making clinical decisions.

Clinical trial registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02664818.

Combination of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios as a Novel Predictor of Cardiac Death in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study

Background Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are novel inflammation markers. Their combined usefulness for estimating the prognosis of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) admitted for acute decompensated heart failure remains elusive. Methods and Results We investigated 1026 patients registered in the Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. Both NLR and PLR values were measured at the time of admission. Comorbidity burden was defined as the number of occurrences of 8 common comorbidities of HFpEF. The primary end point was cardiac death. The patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the optimal cut-off values of NLR and PLR on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for predicting cardiac death (low NLR and PLR, either high NLR or PLR, and both high NLR and PLR). After a median follow-up of 429 days, 195 patients died, with 85 of these deaths attributed to cardiac causes. An increased comorbidity burden was significantly associated with a higher proportion of patients with high NLR (>4.5) or PLR (>193), or both. High NLR and PLR values were independently associated with cardiac death, and a combination of both values was the strongest predictor (hazard ratio, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.51%-4.70%], P=0.0008). A significant difference was found in the rate of cardiac death among the 3 groups stratified by NLR and PLR values. Conclusions The combination of NLR and PLR is useful for the prediction of postdischarge cardiac death in patients with acute HFpEF. Registration URL: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831.

Predictors and Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Above or Below 60

Background Although potential therapeutic candidates for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are emerging, it is still unclear whether they will be effective in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60% or higher. Our aim was to identify the clinical characteristics of these patients with HFpEF by comparing them to patients with LVEF below 60%. Methods and Results From a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort (PURSUIT-HFpEF [Prospective Multicenter Obsevational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction]), we investigated 812 consecutive patients (median age, 83 years; 57% women), including 316 with 50% ≤ LVEF <60% and 496 with 60% ≤ LVEF, and compared the clinical backgrounds of the 2 groups and their prognoses for cardiac mortality or HF readmission. Two hundred four adverse outcomes occurred at a median of 366 days. Multivariable Cox regression tests adjusted for age, sex, heart rate, atrial fibrillation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and prior heart failure hospitalization revealed that systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.925 [95% CI, 0.862-0.992]; P=0.028), high-density lipoprotein to C-reactive protein ratio (HR, 0.975 [95% CI, 0.944-0.995]; P=0.007), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (HR, 0.870 [95% CI, 0.759-0.997]; P=0.037) were uniquely associated with outcomes among patients with 50% ≤ LVEF <60%, whereas only the ratio of peak early mitral inflow velocity to velocity of mitral annulus early diastolic motion e'(HR, 1.034 [95% CI, 1.003-1.062]; P=0.034) was associated with outcomes among patients with 60% ≤ LVEF. Conclusions Prognostic factors show distinct differences between patients with HFpEF with 50% ≤ LVEF <60% and with 60% ≤ LVEF. These findings suggest that the 2 groups have different inherent pathophysiology. Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000024414; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831 PURSUIT-HFpEF.