Sex Differences in Patients With Cryptogenic Cerebrovascular Events Undergoing Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale

Transcranial Doppler With Microbubbles: Screening Test to Detect and Grade Right-to-Left Shunt After an Ischemic Stroke: A Literature Review

Right-to-left shunt, mainly due to patent foramen ovale (PFO), is likely responsible for ≈5% of all ischemic strokes and 10% of those occurring in young and middle-aged adults. Randomized clinical trials demonstrated that, in selected young and middle-aged patients with otherwise cryptogenic acute ischemic stroke and high-risk PFO, percutaneous PFO closure is more effective than antiplatelet therapy alone in preventing recurrence. However, PFO is generally a benign finding and is present in about one-quarter of the population. Therefore, in clinical practice, identifying PFOs that are likely to be pathogenetic is crucial for selecting suitable patients for PFO closure to prevent recurrent stroke and to avoid potentially harmful and costly overtreatment. Contrast transthoracic echocardiography has a relatively low sensitivity in detecting PFO, whereas transesophageal echocardiography is currently considered the gold standard for PFO detection. However, it is a relatively invasive procedure and may not always be easily feasible in the subacute setting. Contrast transcranial Doppler is a noninvasive, inexpensive, accurate tool for the detection of right-to-left shunt. We conducted a literature review on the use of contrast transcranial Doppler to detect and grade right-to-left shunt after an acute ischemic stroke and present a clinical workflow proposal for young and middle-aged patients.

Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Cryptogenic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Evidence from trials suggests that patent foramen ovale closure is superior to medical therapy alone in reducing stroke recurrence in men but not in women. Evidence from real-world data on the impact of sex on outcomes after patent foramen ovale closure, however, remains scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess sex-based differences in long-term outcomes after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolling patients who underwent transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure to prevent recurrent cerebrovascular events. Detailed information from medical charts was entered into a clinical registry, which has been linked to population-based administrative health databases in Ontario. Procedural, short, and long-term outcomes have been compared by sex.

RESULTS

Of the 783 patients included in the sample, 349 (44.5%) were women and 434 (55.5%) were men. Women were younger and had a higher rate of migraine, while men had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. No differences were observed in procedural and 30-day outcomes by sex. At a median follow-up of 14 years, the event rates of recurrent cerebrovascular events, survival, and new-onset atrial fibrillation were not different by sex. In adjusted analysis, men experienced higher rates of pacemaker implantation (hazard ratio, 5.62 [95% CI, 1.57-20.1]).

CONCLUSIONS

No sex-based differences in recurrent cerebrovascular events, survival, or new-onset atrial fibrillation were observed in this study, suggesting equal benefits for both sexes. Future studies should report outcomes by sex to enhance the reproducibility of our findings and help support guideline development.

Antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter structural heart intervention

Percutaneous transcatheter structural heart interventions have considerably expanded within the last two decades, improving clinical outcomes and quality of life versus guideline-directed medical therapy for patients frequently ineligible for surgical treatment. Transcatheter structural heart interventions comprise valve implantation or repair and also occlusions of the patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defects and left atrial appendage. These procedures expose structural devices to arterial or venous blood flow with various rheological conditions leading to potential thrombotic complications and embolisation. Furthermore, these procedures may concern comorbid patients at high risk of both ischaemic and bleeding complications. This state-of-the-art review provides a description of the device-related thrombotic risk associated with these transcatheter structural heart interventions and of the current evidence-based guidelines regarding antithrombotic treatments. Gaps in evidence for each of the studied transcatheter interventions and the main ongoing trials are also summarised.