1
|
Suda S, Abe A, Iguchi Y, Yagita Y, Kanzawa T, Okubo S, Fujimoto S, Kono Y, Kimura K. Safety of recanalization therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke on direct oral anticoagulants: A sub-analysis of PASTA registry study. J Neurol Sci 2023; 448:120639. [PMID: 37030185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before stroke has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety of recanalization therapy in patients receiving DOACs. METHODS We assessed data from a prospective multicenter registry of patients with stroke, including those with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with rtPA and/or MT who were administered DOACs. We evaluated the safety of recanalization considering the DOACs dosage and interval between the last DOAC intake and recanalization. RESULTS The final analysis included 108 patients (women, n = 54; median age, 81 years; DOAC overdose, n = 7; appropriate dose, n = 74; and inappropriate low dose, n = 27). The rate of any ICH differed significantly among overdose-, appropriate dose-, and inappropriate-low dose DOACs groups (71.4, 23.0, and 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.0121), whereas no significant difference was observed in respect of symptomatic ICH (P = 0.6895). Multivariate analysis showed that the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.11; P = 0.0267) and overdose-DOAC (OR: 8.40, 95% CI: 1.24-56.88; P = 0.0291) were independently associated with any ICH. No relationship was observed between the timing of the last DOAC intake and occurrence of ICH in patients treated with rtPA and/or MT (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Recanalization therapy during DOAC treatment may be safe in selected patients with AIS, if it is performed >4 h after the last DOAC intake and the patient is not overdosed with DOACs. REGISTRATION https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000034958.
Collapse
|
2
|
Thalerová S, Pešková M, Kittová P, Gulati S, Víteček J, Kubala L, Mikulík R. Effect of Apixaban Pretreatment on Alteplase-Induced Thrombolysis: An In Vitro Study. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:740930. [PMID: 34603054 PMCID: PMC8479181 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.740930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Benefit of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute stroke, who are on anticoagulant treatment, is not well addressed. The aim of this study was to investigate whether apixaban can modify the thrombolytic efficacy of alteplase in vitro. Static and flow models and two variants of red blood cell (RBC) dominant clots, with and without apixaban, were used. Clots were prepared from the blood of healthy human donors and subsequently exposed to alteplase treatment. Apixaban and alteplase were used in clinically relevant concentrations. Clot lysis in the static model was determined both by clot weight and spectrophotometric determination of RBC release. Clot lysis in the flow model was determined by measuring recanalization time, clot length and spectrophotometric determination of RBC release. In the static model, clots without apixaban; compared to those with apixaban had alteplase-induced mass loss 54 ± 8% vs. 53 ± 8%, p = 1.00; RBC release 0.14 ± 0.04 vs. 0.12 ± 0.04, p = 0.14, respectively. Very similar results were obtained if plasma was used instead of physiological buffered saline as the incubation medium. In the flow model, clot lysis without apixaban; compared to those with apixaban was as follows: recanalization time 107 ± 46 min vs. 127 ± 31 min, p = 1.00; recanalization frequency 90 ± 22% vs. 90 ± 22%, p = 1.00; clot volume reduction 32 ± 15% vs. 34 ± 10%, p = 1.00; RBC release 0.029 ± 0.007 vs. 0.022 ± 0.007, p = 0.16, respectively. Apixaban had no positive effect on alteplase-induced thrombolysis in both the in vitro static and flow models. Our data support current clinical practice, such that thrombolysis is contraindicated in stroke treatment for patients who have been treated with anticoagulants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Thalerová
- Neurology Department, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.,Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.,Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Michaela Pešková
- Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia
| | - Patrícia Kittová
- Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia
| | - Sumeet Gulati
- Neurology Department, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.,Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia
| | - Jan Víteček
- Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.,Center of Biomolecular and Cell Engineering, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia
| | - Lukáš Kubala
- Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.,Center of Biomolecular and Cell Engineering, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia
| | - Robert Mikulík
- Neurology Department, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seiffge DJ, Meinel T, Purrucker JC, Kaesmacher J, Fischer U, Wilson D, Wu TY. Recanalisation therapies for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92:534-541. [PMID: 33542084 PMCID: PMC8053326 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as primary therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, patients may have ischaemic stroke despite DOAC therapy and there is uncertainty whether those patients can safely receive intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. In this review, we summarise and discuss current knowledge about different approaches to select patient. Time since last DOAC intake-as a surrogate for anticoagulant activity-is easy to use but limited by interindividual variability of drug pharmacokinetics and long cut-offs (>48 hours). Measuring anticoagulant activity using drug-specific coagulation assays showed promising safety results. Large proportion of patients at low anticoagulant activity seem to be potentially treatable but there remains uncertainty about exact safe cut-off values and limited assay availability. The use of specific reversal agents (ie, idarucizumab or andexanet alfa) prior to thrombolysis is a new emerging option with first data reporting safety but issues including health economics need to be elucidated. Mechanical thrombectomy appears to be safe without any specific selection criteria applied. In patients on DOAC therapy with large vessel occlusion, decision for intravenous thrombolysis should not delay thrombectomy (eg, direct thrombectomy or immediate transfer to a thrombectomy-capable centre recommended). Precision medicine using a tailored approach combining clinicoradiological information (ie, penumbra and vessel status), anticoagulant activity and use of specific reversal agents only if necessary seems a reasonable choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Seiffge
- Stroke Research Center, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Berne, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Meinel
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Berne, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Johannes Kaesmacher
- University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional of Neuroradiology, University Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric RadiologyUniversity Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional of Neuroradiology, University Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Urs Fischer
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Berne, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Duncan Wilson
- Stroke Research Center, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
- New Zealand Brain Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Teddy Y Wu
- Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
- New Zealand Brain Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Padiglioni C, de la Ossa NP, Strbian D, Tsivgoulis G, Turc G. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J 2021; 6:I-LXII. [PMID: 33817340 DOI: 10.1177/2396987321989865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 482] [Impact Index Per Article: 160.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Intravenous thrombolysis is the only approved systemic reperfusion treatment for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. These European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to assist physicians in their clinical decisions with regard to intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. These guidelines were developed based on the ESO standard operating procedure and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided if not enough evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. We found high quality evidence to recommend intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase to improve functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h after symptom onset. We also found high quality evidence to recommend intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke on awakening from sleep, who were last seen well more than 4.5 h earlier, who have MRI DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and for whom mechanical thrombectomy is not planned. These guidelines provide further recommendations regarding patient subgroups, late time windows, imaging selection strategies, relative and absolute contraindications to alteplase, and tenecteplase. Intravenous thrombolysis remains a cornerstone of acute stroke management. Appropriate patient selection and timely treatment are crucial. Further randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to inform clinical decision-making with regard to tenecteplase and the use of intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eivind Berge
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - William Whiteley
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Heinrich Audebert
- Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin & Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gian Marco De Marchis
- University Hospital of Basel & University of Basel, Department for Neurology & Stroke Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ana Catarina Fonseca
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health (Neurology), Hospital Santa Maria-CHLN, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Chiara Padiglioni
- Neurology Unit-Stroke Unit, Gubbio/Gualdo Tadino and Città di Castello Hospitals, USL Umbria 1, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Daniel Strbian
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Georgios Tsivgoulis
- Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Guillaume Turc
- Department of Neurology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Hopital Sainte-Anne, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM U1266.,FHU NeuroVasc
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meinel TR, Branca M, De Marchis GM, Nedeltchev K, Kahles T, Bonati L, Arnold M, Heldner MR, Jung S, Carrera E, Dirren E, Michel P, Strambo D, Cereda CW, Bianco G, Kägi G, Vehoff J, Katan M, Bolognese M, Backhaus R, Salmen S, Albert S, Medlin F, Berger C, Schelosky L, Renaud S, Niederhauser J, Bonvin C, Schaerer M, Mono ML, Rodic B, Tarnutzer AA, Mordasini P, Gralla J, Kaesmacher J, Engelter S, Fischer U, Seiffge DJ. Prior Anticoagulation in Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Neurol 2020; 89:42-53. [PMID: 32996627 PMCID: PMC7756294 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to evaluate, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute ischemic stroke, the association of prior anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with stroke severity, utilization of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), safety of IVT, and 3-month outcomes. METHODS This was a cohort study of consecutive patients (2014-2019) on anticoagulation versus those without (controls) with regard to stroke severity, rates of IVT/mechanical thrombectomy, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 3 months. RESULTS Of 8,179 patients (mean [SD] age, 79.8 [9.6] years; 49% women), 1,486 (18%) were on VKA treatment, 1,634 (20%) on DOAC treatment at stroke onset, and 5,059 controls. Stroke severity was lower in patients on DOACs (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 4, [interquartile range 2-11]) compared with VKA (6, [2-14]) and controls (7, [3-15], p < 0.001; quantile regression: β -2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.6 to -1.7). The IVT rate in potentially eligible patients was significantly lower in patients on VKA (156 of 247 [63%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.67; 95% CI 0.50-0.90) and particularly in patients on DOACs (69 of 464 [15%]; aOR 0.06; 95% CI 0.05-0.08) compared with controls (1,544 of 2,504 [74%]). sICH after IVT occurred in 3.6% (2.6-4.7%) of controls, 9 of 195 (4.6%; 1.9-9.2%; aOR 0.93; 95% CI 0.46-1.90) patients on VKA and 2 of 65 (3.1%; 0.4-10.8%, aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.28-1.12) of those on DOACs. After adjustments for prognostic confounders, DOAC pretreatment was associated with a favorable 3-month outcome (aOR 1.24; 1.01-1.51). INTERPRETATION Prior DOAC therapy in patients with AF was associated with decreased admission stroke severity at onset and a remarkably low rate of IVT. Overall, patients on DOAC might have better functional outcome at 3 months. Further research is needed to overcome potential restrictions for IVT in patients taking DOACs. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:42-53.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Meinel
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mattia Branca
- Clinicial Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Marco De Marchis
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Timo Kahles
- Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Leo Bonati
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Arnold
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mirjam R Heldner
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simon Jung
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Carrera
- Department of Neurology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth Dirren
- Department of Neurology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrik Michel
- Stroke Center, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Davide Strambo
- Stroke Center, Neurology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carlo W Cereda
- Stroke Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Bianco
- Stroke Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Georg Kägi
- Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Jochen Vehoff
- Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Mira Katan
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Schelosky
- Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Renaud
- Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Neuchatel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Biljana Rodic
- Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Pasquale Mordasini
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Gralla
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Kaesmacher
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Engelter
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatic Medicine Felix Platter, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Urs Fischer
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - David J Seiffge
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jin C, Huang RJ, Peterson ED, Laskowitz DT, Hernandez AF, Federspiel JJ, Schwamm LH, Bhatt DL, Smith EE, Fonarow GC, Xian Y. Intravenous tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Taking Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Preceding Stroke. Stroke 2019; 49:2237-2240. [PMID: 30354981 PMCID: PMC6706353 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.118.022128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background and Purpose- Although there are no trials or large cohorts to inform clinical care, current guidelines caution against giving intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) to patients with acute ischemic stroke who are taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We performed a literature review of intravenous tPA in patients treated with NOACs preceding stroke. Methods- A literature search of PubMed was performed encompassing January 2010 to March 2018. Patient characteristics, timing of last medication intake, laboratory testing, use of reversal, and outcomes ≤3 months after discharge were summarized. Results- We identified 55 studies with 492 NOAC patients receiving tPA (dabigatran, 181; rivaroxaban, 215; apixaban, 40; and unspecified NOAC, 56). Among patients with complete data, the median time from the last NOAC intake to symptom onset was 8 hours (interquartile range, 2.5-14.5), with 55.2% (80/145) within 12 hours. Few patients underwent sensitive laboratory tests, such as thrombin time, diluted thrombin time, or anti-Xa assays before tPA administration. The overall observed rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and favorable outcomes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≤1; modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2; or neurological improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≥8 points) were 4.3% (20/462), 11.3% (48/423), and 43.7% (164/375), respectively. Among dabigatran-treated patients, reversal with idarucizumab was associated with fewer symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.5% [2/44] versus 7.4% [8/108]; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.12-2.92), death (4.5% [2/44] versus 12.0% [13/108]; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.08-1.61), and more favorable outcomes (79.1% [34/43] versus 39.2% [29/74]; unadjusted odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 2.45-14.00), although the differences were not statistically significant for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. Conclusions- These preliminary observations suggest that tPA may be reasonably well tolerated without prohibitive risks of bleeding complications in selected patients on NOACs. Reversal of anticoagulant effects by idarucizumab for dabigatran-treated patients before tPA is an emerging strategy that was associated with more favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Jin
- From the Coronary Heart Disease Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China (C.J.)
| | - Ryan J Huang
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.J.H.)
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (Y.X., A.F.H., E.D.P.)
| | - Daniel T Laskowitz
- Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Y.X., D.T.L.)
| | | | - Jerome J Federspiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (J.J.F.)
| | - Lee H Schwamm
- Division of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (L.H.S.)
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center Boston, MA (D.L.B.).,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.L.B.)
| | - Eric E Smith
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (E.E.S.)
| | - Gregg C Fonarow
- Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles (G.C.F.)
| | - Ying Xian
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (Y.X., A.F.H., E.D.P.).,Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Y.X., D.T.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite the increasing use of NOACs, there is still uncertainty on how to treat NOAC patients presenting with neurological emergencies. Initial assessment of coagulation status is challenging but essential in these patients to provide best-possible treatment in case of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Meanwhile, anticoagulation reversal strategies have been suggested; yet, the optimal management is still unestablished. The current review aims to provide up-to-date information on (i) how to identify patients with NOAC intake, (ii) which therapies are feasible in the setting of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke as well as traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and (iii) how to proceed with patients requiring emergency lumbar puncture. RECENT FINDINGS Despite several expert opinions, there is still an ongoing debate which NOAC patients presenting with ischemic stroke may benefit from recanalizing strategies and whether these treatment approaches can be performed safely. Results from two phase IV trials investigating the efficacy of NOAC-specific reversal agents in case of major bleeding seem promising with regard to hemostatic parameters, but these antidotes have not been verified to clinically benefit patients, and approval by authorities in parts is still pending. Specific reversal agents are on the way and will provide new treatment options in patients with NOAC-related ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Up to now, the decision which patients should undergo recanalizing treatment for ischemic stroke, or which specific pharmacological reversal treatment in hemorrhagic stroke should be initiated, has to be made cautiously on an individual basis after assessing hemostatic parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan T Gerner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hagen B Huttner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings and management of cerebral ischemic events in patients on treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants - A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213379. [PMID: 30925155 PMCID: PMC6440627 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are equally or potentially superior in terms of effectiveness in the prevention of ischemic stroke and carry a lower associated risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to Vitamin K antagonists. Nevertheless, ischemic strokes also occur in patients who are being treated with NOAC. In those particular patients, knowledge about the underlying stroke etiology, clinical presentation, acute management, and complication rates is scarce. Objective Systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive clinical overview in terms of presentation, laboratory, imaging parameters and outcomes of patients suffering from acute cerebral ischemic events (i.e. TIA and acute ischemic stroke) while on treatment with a NOAC. Only if available, comparison to VKA is presented which was not the primary focus of this analysis. Data sources PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE from January 1, 2006, to November 20, 2018. Study eligibility criteria 52 studies providing detailed information on a total of 12247 patients were included. We excluded case reports and case series with less than five patients. Study appraisal and synthesis method We systematically assessed study quality using a bias tool and pooled consistent data. Results Existing data indicates milder stroke severity and smaller infarct size of acute ischemic stroke on treatment with NOAC compared to stroke occurrence on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Established risk factors for ischemic events also play a role in stroke while on NOACs, albeit the underlying etiology remains poorly understood. Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy seem to be safe and effective, but patient selection for recanalization therapies is challenging. Limitations Limited quality of published data, duplicate cases, statistical issues of data pooling, possible incomplete retrieval of identified research and reporting bias might have limited our findings. Conclusions Acute ischemic events despite treatment with NOAC therapy are insufficiently investigated. Systematic review registration number PROSPERO: CRD42018074853.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mundiyanapurath S, Hees K, Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Uhlmann L, Kieser M, Ringleb PA, Hacke W, Nagel S. Predictors of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in off-label thrombolysis: an analysis of the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke registry. Eur J Neurol 2017; 25:340-e11. [PMID: 29105904 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the only approved pharmacological treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Off-label IVT for ischemic stroke is common. We aimed to analyse its safety in a large database. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of the safe implementation of treatments in stroke (SITS) thrombolysis registry with regard to 11 off-label criteria according to the European licence for alteplase. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) according to SITS was defined as primary safety endpoint and SICH according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II) definition and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke definition as secondary safety endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analyses after replacing missing values using multiple imputations were performed. RESULTS Patients from 793 centres in 44 countries were included, mainly (95%) in Europe. A total of 56 258 patients who were treated with intravenous alteplase were included. Median age was 71 (IQR 61-78) years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 12 (IQR 7-17). A total of 16 740 (30%) patients received off-label IVT and 1037 (1.8%) patients suffered from SICH according to the SITS definition (SICH SITS). Median percentage of missing values per variable was 0.4%. The only two off-label criteria constituting independent positive and negative predictors for SICH SITS were high blood pressure (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.80; P = 0.012) and minor stroke (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.78; P = 0.002). Very severe stroke, previous stroke and diabetes, age and high glucose levels were additional independent predictors of SICH according to the ECASS II and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke definitions. CONCLUSIONS Thrombolysis appears to be safe with regard to SICH for most of the off-label criteria, especially for minor stroke, but is risky in patients with high blood pressure. Individual risk-benefit evaluation should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - K Hees
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N Ahmed
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.,Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital-Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Wahlgren
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.,Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital-Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Uhlmann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Kieser
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P A Ringleb
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - W Hacke
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - S Nagel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| |
Collapse
|