Balancing Benefits and Risks of Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Transient Ischemic Attack or Stroke

Safety and efficacy of desmopressin (DDAVP) in preventing hematoma expansion in intracranial hemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drugs use: A systematic review and metaanalysis

INTRODUCTION

One of the most serious complications associated with antiplatelet agents is antiplatelet-associated intracranial hemorrhage (AA-ICH). Desmopressin is a synthetic antidiuretic hormone (ADH) analog. It has been linked to improving patient outcomes in antiplatelet-induced intracranial hemorrhage. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of thrombotic complications and neurological outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov) to find eligible literature that compares desmopressin (DDAVP) versus controls in patients with AA-ICH. The Mantel-Haenszel statistic was used to determine an overall effect estimate for each outcome by calculating the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 test. The risk of bias in studies was calculated using the New Castle Ottowa Scale.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the analysis with a total of 598 patients. DDAVP was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in the risk of hematoma expansion (RR = .8, 95% CI,.51-1.24; p = .31, I2 = 44%). It was also associated with a non-significant decrease in the risk of thrombotic events (RR,.83; 95% CI,.25-2.76; p = .76, I2 = 30%). However, patients in the DDAVP group demonstrated a significant increase in the risk of poor neurological outcomes (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.61; p = .01, I2 = 0%). The risk of bias assessment showed a moderate to low level of risk.

CONCLUSION

DDAVP was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in hematoma expansion and thrombotic events. However, it was also associated with a significantly poor neurological outcome in the patients. Thus, until more robust clinical trials are conducted, the use of DDAVP should be considered on a case-to-case basis.

Cerebral hemorrhage after thrombolysis in stroke patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For ischemic stroke patients with concomitant unruptured aneurysm, intravenous thrombolysis therapy (IVT) remains a disputable decision. We hence performed a meta-analysis to identify the related brain hemorrhage rate of unruptured aneurysms and the risk ratio for their rupture comparing to stroke patients who do not have aneurysms.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the studies from the online database from 2000 to September 1st, 2022. Cohort studies were included and assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality. The research procedures were subjected to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Fixed-effects model was used based on the heterogeneity tests.

RESULTS

In 10 eligible studies, 7238 ischemic stroke patients were screened, a total of 302 patients with 348 aneurysms were included. 10 studies were eligible for ICH rate analysis, 8 for SAH rate analysis and 7 for risk ratio of stroke patients with unruptured aneurysms. The pooled any ICH rate was 16% (95% CI 11-21%), symptomatic ICH rate was 4% (95% CI 1-7%, I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.90), and 0% (95% CI 0-1%) for aneurysm-related ICH. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was as low as 2% (95% CI 0-5%), while 0% (95% CI 0-2%) directly related to the aneurysm rupture. The risk ratio of ICH in stroke patients with aneurysms was 1.18 (95% CI 0.79-1.77). Additionally, the hemorrhage rate difference was not evident between saccular and fusiform aneurysms due to a lack of details.

CONCLUSIONS

IVT is unlikely to induce hemorrhage of pre-existing unruptured aneurysms in stroke patients. Further randomized control studies are warranted to validate these conclusions.

Acute, periprocedural and longterm antithrombotic therapy in older adults: 2022 Update by the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis

The first international guidance on antithrombotic therapy in the elderly came from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis in 2015. This same group has updated its previous report on antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs for older patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes, atrial fibrillation, or undergoing surgery or procedures typical of the elderly (transcatheter aortic valve implantation and left atrial appendage closure). The aim is to provide a succinct but comprehensive tool for readers to understand the bases of antithrombotic therapy in older patients, despite the complexities of comorbidities, comedications and uncertain ischaemic- vs. bleeding-risk balance. Fourteen updated consensus statements integrate recent trial data and other evidence, with a focus on high bleeding risk. Guideline recommendations, when present, are highlighted, as well as gaps in evidence. Key consensus points include efforts to improve medical adherence through deprescribing and polypill use; adoption of universal risk definitions for bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke and cause-specific death; multiple bleeding-avoidance strategies, ranging from gastroprotection with aspirin use to selection of antithrombotic-drug composition, dosing and duration tailored to multiple variables (setting, history, overall risk, age, weight, renal function, comedications, procedures) that need special consideration when managing older adults.

Management of Oral Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke with and without Atrial Fibrillation

The association between atrial fibrillation (AF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and stroke is a complex scenario in which the assessment of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk is necessary for scheduling an individually tailored therapeutic plan. Recent clinical trials investigating new antithrombotic drugs and dual and triple pathways in high-risk cardiovascular patients have revealed a new therapeutic scenario. In this paper, we review the burden of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients post-myocardial infarction with and without atrial fibrillation and the possible therapeutic strategies from a stroke point of view.

OUP accepted manuscript

The management of patients with stroke is often multidisciplinary, involving various specialties and healthcare professionals. Given the common shared risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular disease, input may also be required from the cardiovascular teams, as well as patient caregivers and next-of-kin. Ultimately, the patient is central to all this, requiring a coordinated and uniform approach to the priorities of post-stroke management, which can be consistently implemented by different multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, as part of the patient ‘journey’ or ‘patient pathway,’ supported by appropriate education and tele-medicine approaches. All these aspects would ultimately aid delivery of care and improve patient (and caregiver) engagement and empowerment. Given the need to address the multidisciplinary approach to holistic or integrated care of patients with heart disease and stroke, the European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke convened a Task Force, with the remit to propose a consensus on Integrated care management for optimizing the management of stroke and associated heart disease. The present position paper summarizes the available evidence and proposes consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and simple practical approaches to assist in everyday clinical practice. A post-stroke ABC pathway is proposed, as a more holistic approach to integrated stroke care, would include three pillars of management:

A: Appropriate Antithrombotic therapy.

B: Better functional and psychological status.

C: Cardiovascular risk factors and Comorbidity optimization (including lifestyle changes).