Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: Identification, Medical and Interventional Treatment, and Outcomes

Intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful endovascular recanalisation in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion (ATTENTION-IA): multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful endovascular recanalisation improves outcomes in patients with acute arterial occlusion of the posterior circulation.

DESIGN

Multicentre randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

31 hospitals in China, 24 January 2023 to 24 August 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

208 patients with successful recanalisation (grade 2b50-3 on the extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale) of an occlusion in the V4 segment of the vertebral artery; proximal, middle, or distal segment of the basilar artery; or P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery: 104 were randomly allocated to receive tenecteplase and 104 to receive standard care.

INTERVENTIONS

Intra-arterial tenecteplase (0.0625 mg/kg, maximum dose 6.25 mg) administered proximal to the residual thrombus (if still present) or distal to the origin of the main pontine perforator branches over 15 seconds, or endovascular treatment only (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was freedom from disability (modified Rankin scale score 0 or 1) at 90 days after randomisation. Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours and all cause mortality at 90 days. All efficacy and safety analyses were conducted by intention to treat and adjusted for age, pre-stroke modified Rankin scale score, time from onset of moderate to severe stroke (National Institutes of Health stroke scale score ≥6) to randomisation, hypertension, and baseline stroke severity.

RESULTS

At 90 days, 36 patients (34.6%) in the tenecteplase group and 27 (26.0%) in the control group had a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 (adjusted risk ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 2.02; P=0.12). Mortality at 90 days was similar between the tenecteplase and control groups: 29 (27.9%) v 28 (26.9%), adjusted risk ratio 1.13, 0.73 to 1.74. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours occurred in eight patients (8.3%) in the tenecteplase group and three (3.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk ratio 3.09, 0.78 to 12.20).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to acute posterior large or proximal vessel occlusion, intra-arterial tenecteplase administered after successful recanalisation was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in combined disability and mortality at 90 days.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684172.

Intensive blood pressure lowering in acute stroke with intracranial stenosis post-thrombectomy: A secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial

BACKGROUND

Intensive blood pressure (BP) management within 24 h after successful reperfusion following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is associated with worse functional outcomes than conventional BP management in Asian randomized controlled trials. Given the high prevalence of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) in Asia, ICAS may influence these outcomes.

AIMS

We aimed to assess whether ICAS affects the outcomes of intensive BP management after successful EVT.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control trial, which enrolled participants from June 2020 to November 2022. Patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) were stratified into ICAS-related and embolic LVO groups. Clinical outcomes for intensive (target systolic BP < 140 mm Hg) and conventional BP management (target systolic BP = 140-180 mm Hg) were analyzed in each group. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 36 h and stroke-related death within 3 months.

RESULTS

Among 192 patients, 59 were in the ICAS-related LVO group, and 133 were in the embolic LVO group. In the ICAS-related LVO group, the rate of achieving a favorable outcome at 3 months was 37.5% with intensive BP management and 55.6% with conventional management (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.14 to 1.75); P = 0.27). In the embolic LVO group, these rates were 29.9% and 42.4%, respectively (adjusted OR = 0.64 (95% CI = 0.28 to 1.45); P = 0.29). No significant interaction was found (P for interaction = 0.68). In addition, the ICAS-related LVO group receiving intensive BP management had lower rates of successful reperfusion at 24 h compared to conventional management (67.7% vs. 91.7%; P = 0.03), while no significant difference was found in the embolic LVO group. A significant interaction effect on successful reperfusion at 24 h was observed between ICAS-related and embolic LVO groups (P for interaction = 0.04). No significant differences in safety outcomes were observed between intensive BP management and conventional management within both ICAS-related LVO and embolic LVO groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ICAS did not significantly affect outcomes of intensive BP management within 24 h after successful EVT. After successful reperfusion by EVT, intensive BP management should be avoided regardless of ICAS presence.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Effect of stroke etiology on treatment-related outcomes in young adults with large vessel occlusion: Results from a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Large vessel occlusion-acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS) is infrequent in young adults and exhibits distinct stroke mechanisms compared to older adults. This study sought to evaluate the impact of varying stroke etiologies on treatment-related outcomes in young adults with LVO-AIS, an aspect that remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18-50 presenting with AIS from January 2017 to December 2021 within our multi-center stroke network. Patients with LVO on CTA/MRA at presentation were included. We assessed demographics, stroke etiology (TOAST classification), and treatment-related outcomes. Based on intervention received, patients were divided into 5 groups [IV-thrombolysis (IVT) only, Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) only, IVT+MT, no treatment, unsuccessful MT].

RESULTS

Among 1210 AIS patients, 220 with LVO were included. The median age was 42 (36, 46). 75 (34.1 %) patients underwent successful MT (46.7 % received IVT+MT). 26 (11.8 %) received IVT only, 110 (50 %) received neither intervention, and 9 (4.1 %) underwent unsuccessful MT. Per TOAST, 17.4 % had large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), 19.2 % cardio-embolism, 28.6 % stroke of other etiology, and 34.7 % had undetermined etiology. Favorable thrombectomy outcomes (TICI 2b/2c/3) were observed in 87.2 %. Discharge NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores improved for patients with IVT+MT in all TOAST categories except LAA.

CONCLUSIONS

Young adults with LVO-AIS had good outcomes irrespective of stroke etiology, except LAA, which was associated with a higher discharge NIHSS. Moreover, 50 % of young adults in our study received no intervention, a quarter of those owing to delayed presentation. Further studies are needed to identify barriers in seeking acute treatment in young adults with LVO-AIS.

The volume of steal phenomenon is associated with neurological deterioration in patients with large-vessel occlusion minor stroke not eligible for thrombectomy

INTRODUCTION

A significant number of patients who present with mild symptoms following large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS) are currently considered ineligible for EVT. However, they frequently experience neurological deterioration during hospitalization. This study aimed to investigate the association between neurological deterioration and hemodynamic impairment by assessing steal phenomenon derived from blood oxygenation-level dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) in this specific patient cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the database of our single-center BOLD-CVR observational cohort study (June 2015-October 2023) we retrospectively identified acute ischemic stroke patients with admission NIHSS < 6, a newly detected large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation and ineligible for EVT. Neurological deterioration during hospitalization as well as outcome at hospital discharge were rated with NIHSS score. We analyzed the association between these two outcomes and BOLD-CVR-derived steal phenomenon volume through regression analysis. Additionally, we investigated the discriminatory accuracy of steal phenomenon volume for predicting neurological deterioration.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the final analysis. Neurological deterioration occurred in 35% of patients. In the regression analysis, a strong association between steal phenomenon volume and neurological deterioration (OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.32-31.04, p = 0.04) as well as poorer NIHSS score at hospital discharge (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.52-10.78, p = 0.007) was found. The discriminatory accuracy of steal phenomenon for neurological deterioration prediction had an AUC of 0.791 (95% CI 0.653-0.930).

DISCUSSION

Based on our results we may distinguish two groups of patients with minor stroke currently ineligible for EVT, however, showing hemodynamic impairment and exhibiting neurological deterioration during hospitalization: (1) patients exhibiting steal phenomenon on BOLD-CVR imaging as well as hemodynamic impairment on resting perfusion imaging; (2) patients exhibiting steal phenomenon on BOLD-CVR imaging, however, no relevant hemodynamic impairment on resting perfusion imaging.

CONCLUSION

The presence of BOLD-CVR derived steal phenomenon may aid to further study hemodynamic impairment in patients with minor LVO-AIS not eligible for EVT.

European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the acute management of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). These guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the ESO and according to the GRADE methodology. Although BAO accounts for only 1%-2% of all strokes, it has very poor natural outcome. We identified 10 relevant clinical situations and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions, based on which a systematic literature search and review was performed. The working group consisted of 10 voting members (five representing ESO and five ESMINT) and three non-voting junior members. The certainty of evidence was generally very low. In many PICOs, available data were scarce or lacking, hence, we provided expert consensus statements. First, we compared intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to no IVT, but specific BAO-related data do not exist. Yet, historically, IVT was standard of care for BAO patients who were also included (albeit in small numbers) in IVT trials. Non-randomised studies of IVT-only cohorts showed high proportion of favourable outcomes. Expert Consensus suggests using IVT up to 24 h unless otherwise contraindicated. We further suggest IVT plus endovascular treatment (EVT) over direct EVT. EVT on top of best medical treatment (BMT) was compared to BMT alone within 6 and 6-24 h from last seen well. In both time windows, we observed a different effect of treatment depending on (a) the region where the patients were treated (Europe vs. Asia), (b) on the proportion of IVT in the BMT arm, and (c) on the initial stroke severity. In case of high proportion of IVT in the BMT group and in patients with NIHSS below 10, EVT plus BMT was not found better than BMT alone. Based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest EVT + BMT over BMT alone (i.e. based on results of patients with at least 10 NIHSS points and a low proportion of IVT in BMT). For patients with an NIHSS below 10, we found no evidence to recommend EVT over BMT. In fact, BMT was non-significantly better and safer than EVT. Furthermore, we found a stronger treatment effect of EVT + BMT over BMT alone in proximal and middle locations of BAO compared to distal location. While recommendations for patients without extensive early ischaemic changes in the posterior fossa can, in general, follow those of other PICOs, we formulated an Expert Consensus Statement suggesting against reperfusion therapy in those with extensive bilateral and/or brainstem ischaemic changes. Another Expert Consensus suggests reperfusion therapy regardless of collateral scores. Based on limited evidence, we suggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as the first-line strategy of mechanical thrombectomy. As an Expert Consensus, we suggest rescue percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting after a failed EVT procedure. Finally, based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest add-on antithrombotic treatment during EVT or within 24 h after EVT in patients with no concomitant IVT and in whom EVT was complicated (defined as failed or imminent re-occlusion, or need for additional stenting or angioplasty).

Thrombectomy Outcomes in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusions Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) large vessel occlusion (LVO) is responsible for up to 30% of LVO. In this study, we aimed to determine the likelihood of favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) in acute ICAD-LVO basilar occlusion compared with embolic basilar occlusion.

METHODS

This is an analysis of the Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Evaluation: Analyzing Radiographic and Intraprocedural Predictors for Mechanical Thrombectomy Registry in which patients with acute basilar artery occlusions from 8 comprehensive stroke centers were included from 2015 to 2021. Patients were dichotomized into with (ICAD-LVO) or without underlying ICAD (embolic). Descriptive statistics for each group and multivariate logistic analysis were performed on the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-six patients were included. There were 215 patients with embolic (62%) and 131 patients with ICAD-LVO (38%). Baseline demographics were equivalent between the 2 groups except for sex (male 47% vs 67%; P < .001), history of stroke (12% vs 25%; P = .002), and atrial fibrillation (31% vs 17%; P = .003). At 90 days, patients in the ICAD-LVO cohort were less likely to achieve favorable functional outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.72; P = .003) after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. In addition, ICAD-LVO strokes were less likely to achieve thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.57; P < .001). ICAD-LVO lesions were more likely to require stent placement (OR 14.94, 95% CI 4.91-45.49; P < .001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated favorable functional outcomes in patients who underwent stenting and angioplasty compared with failed recanalization cohort (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.68-14.64; P < .004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with acute basilar ICAD-LVO have higher morbidity and mortality compared with patients with embolic source. Lower rates of successful recanalization in the ICAD-LVO cohort support this finding. Our subgroup analysis demonstrates that stenting should be considered in patients with recanalization failure. Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the ICAD-LVO and embolic cohorts.

Understanding physician preferences about combined thrombolysis and thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion: An international cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

A recently published individual participant-level meta-analysis found that EVT alone was not non-inferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and EVT. Our aim was to determine factors that influence physicians' treatment choice of IVT-alone versus EVT-alone versus a combined approach.

METHODS

We performed an international, structured, invite-only survey among physicians treating patients presenting with AIS. Respondents were asked 16 multiple choice questions. Fourteen questions involved the respondent being provided with a clinical scenario. In each scenario, a patient was presenting with an AIS with LVO, varying a single clinical or imaging feature.

RESULTS

A total of 282 stroke physicians (mean age 46 years, 75 % males) participated in the survey. In LVO stroke, eligible for both IVT and EVT, without other qualifiers, 220 (85.9 %) respondents chose to pursue a combined approach. For age over 80 years, 191 (74 %) participants opted for combined approach, which decreased to 121 (48.2 %) with dementia and 148 (57.4 %) if the patient was on dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Of respondents choosing combination therapy in a patient above the age of 80, only 105 (56.8 %) would pursue the same in a patient with dementia. For imaging factors, 177 (72.8 %) opted for a combined approach for intracranial carotid occlusion, which decreased to 160 (65.3 %) in tandem occlusions. Overall, 88 (38 %) respondents agreed to the statement "I am uncomfortable with uncertainty in patient care".

CONCLUSIONS

In a typical patient with AIS due to LVO, most respondents still choose a combined revascularization approach but discrepancy in decision-making increases in complex scenarios.

First-in-human trial of a self-expandable, temporary dilation system for intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) significantly contributes to ischemic stroke, especially among Asian populations. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) due to underlying ICAD accounts for 15-35% of acute ischemic stroke cases requiring endovascular therapy. However, the successful recanalization rate of ICAD-related LVO remains lower. The TG dilator is a self-expandable device, temporarily dilating ICAD-related blocked blood vessels.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate TG dilator safety and efficacy for ICAD-related acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized, prospective, multicenter, and investigator-initiated trial that involved patients undergoing TG dilator application for acute ischemic stroke caused by ICAD-related LVO or severe stenosis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 10 patients in this trial between November 2022 and April 2023. The median (IQR) age was 68 (59.3-75.3) years. Before using the dilator, seven patients received stent retriever treatment. All 10 patients were prescribed a loading dose of aspirin with prasugrel. The median application time was 10 (10-12) min. At the end of the procedure, we achieved significant recanalization immediately in all patients. The stenosis/occlusion decreased from 100% (100-100) to 68% (56.3-75.3). No patient experienced recurrent ischemic stroke or reocclusion within 90 days. We achieved a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 in 8 patients by day 90. We detected no cases of intracranial hemorrhage, equipment failure, distal embolism, vasospasm, dissection, or perforation requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute revascularization using the TG dilator on patients with ICAD-related LVO or severe stenosis did not cause any significant adverse event, and consistently improved blood flow at 90 days.

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease mechanism indicates poor outcomes of thrombectomy in acute cerebral infarction with large vessel occlusion: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thrombectomy is a standard treatment for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO); however, its effectiveness in treating LVO related to intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare thrombectomy outcomes in ICAD-related and embolic LVO, focusing on patients with similar symptom severities upon hospital admission.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at Jikei University Hospital and Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital between October 2017 and March 2023. Ischemic stroke patients with LVO who underwent thrombectomy were categorized into ICAD and embolism groups based on the occlusion mechanism. Groups were matched using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at the time of admission. A modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6 at 90 days after symptom onset was defined as a devastating outcome. The procedural outcomes and frequency of devastating outcomes were compared between the ICAD and embolism groups.

RESULTS

The study included 33 matched pairs were included. The ICAD group showed lower rates of successful reperfusion (43 % vs. 82 %, p = 0.001), and longer procedural times (median 88 min vs. 50 min, p < 0.001) than the embolism group. The ICAD group had a significantly higher frequency of devastating outcomes than the non-ICAD group (39 % vs. 15 %, p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified ICAD as an independent factor associated with devastating outcomes (OR, 3.804; 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI), 1.148-12.603; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

In thrombectomy therapy, reperfusion rates and outcomes are significantly worse in patients with ICAD-LVO than in patients with embolic LVO.

A woman with carotid atherosclerotic plaques suffered a massive cerebral infarction after carbon monoxide poisoning-A case report

Cases of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning complicated with massive cerebral infarction are rare. A chinese female patient with carotid atherosclerotic plaque was found unconscious during bathing. The patient was diagnosed as carbon monoxide poisoning complicated with massive acute cerebral infarction by carbon monoxide hemoglobin (COHb) detection and imaging examination. The patient regained consciousness after treatment with hyperbaric oxygen, antiplatelet, and atorvastatin. This case suggests that patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque may be more susceptible to develop acute cerebral infarction when CO poisoning occurs.

Stent Retriever AssIsted Lysis Technique with Tirofiban: A Potential Bailout Alternative to Angioplasty and Stenting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Angioplasty and stent placement have been described as a bailout technique in individuals with failed thrombectomy. We aimed to investigate Stent retriever AssIsted Lysis (SAIL) with tirofiban before angioplasty and stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients from 2 comprehensive stroke centers were reviewed (2020-2023). We included patients with failed thrombectomy and/or underlying intracranial stenosis who received SAIL with tirofiban before the intended angioplasty and stent placement. SAIL consisted of deploying a stent retriever through the occluding lesion to create a bypass channel and infuse 10 mL of tirofiban for 10 minutes either intra-arterially or IV. The stent retriever was re-sheathed before retrieval. The primary end points were successful reperfusion (expanded TICI 2b-3) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Additional end points included 90-day mRS 0-2 and mortality.

RESULTS

After a median of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4) passes, 44 patients received the SAIL bridging protocol with tirofiban, and later they were considered potential candidates for angioplasty and stent placement bailout (43.2%, intra-arterial SAIL). Post-SAIL successful reperfusion was obtained in 79.5%. A notable residual stenosis (>50%) after successful SAIL was observed in 45.7%. No significant differences were detected according to post-SAIL: successful reperfusion (intra-arterial SAIL, 80.0% versus IV-SAIL, 78.9%; P = .932), significant stenosis (33.3% versus 55.0%; P = .203), early symptomatic re-occlusion (0% versus 8.0%; P = .207), or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (5.3% versus 8.0%; P = .721). Rescue angioplasty and stent placement were finally performed in 15 (34.1%) patients (intra-arterial SAIL 21.0% versus IV-SAIL 44%; P = .112). At 90 days, mRS 0-2 (intra-arterial SAIL 50.0% versus IV-SAIL 43.5%; P = .086) and mortality (26.3% versus 12.0%; P = .223) were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stroke in which angioplasty and stent placement are considered, SAIL with tirofiban, either intra-arterial or IV, seems to safely induce sustained recanalization, offering a potential alternative to definitive angioplasty and stent placement.

Single-Center Experience With Endovascular Therapy in Acute Occlusion of ICAS: Preferred Stent Thrombectomy Versus Preferred Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

The preferred endovascular therapy (EVT) for large-vessel occlusion in intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is unknown. We compared the efficacy of preferred stent thrombectomy and preferred angioplasty in patients with acute large-vessel occlusion in ICAS.

METHODS

Data from consecutive EVT patients (May 2020 to September 2023) with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in ICAS were retrospectively analyzed. Preferred angioplasty was performed if there was a preoperative "microcatheter first-pass effect;" otherwise, preferred stent thrombectomy was performed. Analyses were grouped according to the two EVT treatments. Clinical data of all patients, including the time from puncture to recanalization, rate of successful reperfusion, early neurological improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Six-two patients were enrolled in this study (mean age was 60.66±13.21 y, 22.6% female). The preferred angioplasty group had a higher first-pass recanalization rate than the preferred stent thrombectomy group (61.3% vs. 21.9%, P <0.001) and a higher proportion of patients who were functionally independent (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3) at 90 days [odds ratio,3.681; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.009 to 13.428; P =0.048]. There was no significant difference between the groups in the time from puncture to recanalization, the frequency of successful reperfusion, and early neurological improvement, or intracranial hemorrhage ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in ICAS, preferred angioplasty may be a safe and effective procedure.

Efficacy and safety of thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO)-induced posterior circulation ischemic stroke.

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) with and without bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute BAO, using an updated meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared the efficacy and safety of EVT with and without IVT in the treatment of acute BAO ischemic stroke. The extracted data included sample size, patient age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 and 0-3, mortality rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Results

Five studies that included a total of 1,578 patients (594 IVT + EVT vs. 984 EVT), met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that bridging IVT was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (41% vs. 34%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68, p = 0.006). Furthermore, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVT + EVT group than in the direct EVT group (25% vs. 30%; OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, p = 0.003), with low heterogeneity observed (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.78). However, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the rates of sICH (5% vs. 6%; OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52-1.39, p = 0.53), SAH (3% vs. 3%; OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.39-2.22, p = 0.87), perforation (2% vs. 3%; OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95, p = 0.51), and dissection (3% vs. 2%; OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.13-7.14, p = 0.98).

Conclusion

Bridging IVT in conjunction with EVT was associated with better functional outcomes and reduced mortality rates in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to BAO compared to EVT alone, without an increased risk of sICH, SAH, perforation, and dissection. In addition, the benefit of bridging IVT to EVT appeared to be more pronounced in European patients than in Asian patients compared to EVT alone. However, the conclusions of this study are not definitive and require validation through large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to draw more robust conclusions.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024531363.

Endovascular management of acute stroke

Stroke related to large vessel occlusion is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide. Advances in endovascular therapy to reopen occluded arteries have been shown to reduce patient disability and mortality. Expanded indications to treat patients with large vessel occlusion in the late window (>6 h from symptom onset), with basilar artery occlusion, and with large ischaemic core at presentation have enabled treatment of more patients with simplified imaging methods. Ongoing knowledge gaps include an understanding of which patients with large ischaemic infarct are more likely to benefit from endovascular therapy, the role of endovascular therapy in patients who present with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores or medium or distal vessel occlusion, and optimal management of patients with underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease. As reperfusion can now be facilitated by intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both, the development of cytoprotective or adjunctive drugs to slow infarct growth, enhance reperfusion, or decrease haemorrhagic risk has gained renewed interest with the hope to improve patient outcomes.

Spontaneous recanalization in acute large core ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated that a subset of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) experience spontaneous recanalization (SR), but the prognosis and factors associated with SR in these individuals are not well characterized.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc secondary analysis of the Study of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core (ANGEL-ASPECT) trial. SR in the medical management group was defined as a modified arterial occlusive lesion (AOL) grade of 2 or 3 on computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 36 hours (±12 hours).

RESULTS

SR was detected in 67 out of 184 patients (36.4%) in the medical management (MM) group. The median age of patients was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) 58-72), and 48 (71.6%) were male. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score shift toward better outcomes of the MM with SR group vs the MM without SR group was 1.83, with marginally significant difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.992 to 3.36; P=0.053). No significant difference was found between the MM with SR group and EVT recanalization group (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 0.86 to 2.43; P=0.16) with similar findings in the inverse probability treatment weighting analysis (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.48; P=0.57). Multivariable regression analysis showed that hypertension, atherothrombotic stroke and higher clot burden score were factors associated with SR.

CONCLUSIONS

SR in medically managed patients with acute large ischemic stroke caused by LVO was associated with good functional outcome. An improved understanding of SR patients may be helpful to develop therapeutic strategy in patients with large infarct due to LVO in anterior circulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04551664.

Stent Retriever Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease-Related Medium Vessel Occlusion: A Case Report and Literature Review

Objective

Stent retriever (SR) angioplasty is an adjunctive technique for acute large vessel occlusion stroke due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD-LVO). Prolonged SR deployment maintains blood flow distal to the atherosclerotic lesion until the antiplatelet agent has exerted its effect. Although SR angioplasty for ICAD-LVO has been reported, few reports are available on SR angioplasty for medium vessel occlusion stroke due to underlying ICAD (ICAD-MeVO). Here, we describe a case of SR angioplasty for acute occlusion of the left M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) due to underlying ICAD.

Case Presentation

A 79-year-old man with a history of left MCA M2 segment stenosis presented with motor aphasia and dysarthria. Diffusion-weighted MRI showed no high-signal intensity areas, and MRA showed occlusion of the left MCA M2 segment. The patient was diagnosed with ICAD-MeVO. After performing an MRI, the patient's symptoms progressed to total aphasia. SR angioplasty was performed for the occlusion of the left M2 segment of the MCA. Diffusion-weighted MRI the day after the procedure showed a small area of high-signal intensity exclusively in the left putamen, while MRA confirmed recanalization of the left MCA M2 segment. Aphasia improved after the procedure. No re-occlusion was observed for 90 days, and the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days was 2.

Conclusion

SR angioplasty appears to be a safe option for managing MCA M2 segment occlusion.

Potential of BMI as a screening indicator for extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic artery occlusion: a post-hoc analysis of the CMOSS trial

BACKGROUND

To investigate the association between BMI and the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic artery occlusion, and further to evaluate the utility of BMI as a screening tool for identifying candidates for extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors analyzed the relationship between BMI and the occurrence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke (IIS) among patients receiving only medical management in the Carotid or Middle cerebral artery Occlusion Surgery Study (CMOSS). Additionally, the authors compared the primary endpoint of CMOSS-stroke or death within 30 days, or IIS after 30 days up to 2 years-among patients with varying BMIs who underwent either surgery or medical treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 165 patients who treated medically only, 16 (9.7%) suffered an IIS within 2 years. BMI was independently associated with the incidence of IIS (hazard ratio: 1.16 per kg/m 2 ; 95% CI: 1.06-1.27). The optimal BMI cutoff for predicting IIS was 24.5 kg/m 2 . Patients with BMI ≥24.5 kg/m 2 experienced a higher incidence of IIS compared to those with BMI <24.5 kg/m 2 (17.4 vs. 0.0%, P <0.01). The incidence of the CMOSS primary endpoint was significantly different between the surgical and medical groups for patients with BMI ≥24.5 kg/m 2 (5.3 vs. 19.8%, P <0.01) and those with BMI <24.5 kg/m 2 (10.6 vs. 1.4%; P =0.02). Surgical intervention was independently associated with a reduced rate of the CMOSS primary endpoint in patients with BMI ≥24.5 kg/m 2 .

CONCLUSION

Data from the CMOSS trial indicate that patients with BMI ≥24.5 kg/m 2 are at a higher risk of IIS when treated medically only and appear to derive greater benefit from bypass surgery compared to those with lower BMIs. Given the small sample size and the inherent limitations of retrospective analyses, further large-scale, prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the acute management of patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). These guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the ESO and according to the GRADE methodology.Although BAO accounts for only 1-2% of all strokes, it has very poor natural outcome. We identified 10 relevant clinical situations and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions, based on which a systematic literature search and review was performed. The working group consisted of 10 voting members (five representing ESO and five representing the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT)) and three non-voting junior members. The certainty of evidence was generally very low. In many PICOs, available data were scarce or lacking, hence, we provided expert consensus statements.First, we compared intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to no IVT, but specific BAO-related data do not exist. Yet, historically, IVT was standard of care for BAO patients who were also included (although in small numbers) in IVT trials. Non-randomized studies of IVT-only cohorts showed a high proportion of favorable outcomes. Expert Consensus suggests using IVT up to 24 hours unless otherwise contraindicated. We further suggest IVT plus endovascular treatment (EVT) over direct EVT. EVT on top of best medical treatment (BMT) was compared with BMT alone within 6 and 6-24 hours from last seen well. In both time windows, we observed a different effect of treatment depending on a) the region where the patients were treated (Europe vs Asia), b) on the proportion of IVT in the BMT arm, and c) on the initial stroke severity. In case of high proportion of IVT in the BMT group and in patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score below 10, EVT plus BMT was not found better than BMT alone. Based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest EVT+BMT over BMT alone (this is based on results of patients with at least 10 NIHSS points and a low proportion of IVT in BMT). For patients with an NIHSS score below 10, we found no evidence to recommend EVT over BMT. In fact, BMT was non-significantly better and safer than EVT. Furthermore, we found a stronger treatment effect of EVT+BMT over BMT alone in proximal and middle locations of BAO compared with distal location. While recommendations for patients without extensive early ischemic changes in the posterior fossa can, in general, follow those of other PICOs, we formulated an Expert Consensus Statement suggesting against reperfusion therapy in those with extensive bilateral and/or brainstem ischemic changes. Another Expert Consensus suggests reperfusion therapy regardless of collateral scores. Based on limited evidence, we suggest direct aspiration over stent retriever as the first-line strategy of mechanical thrombectomy. As an Expert Consensus, we suggest rescue percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting after a failed EVT procedure. Finally, based on very low certainty of evidence, we suggest add-on antithrombotic treatment during EVT or within 24 hours after EVT in patients with no concomitant IVT and in whom EVT was complicated (defined as failed or imminent re-occlusion, or need for additional stenting or angioplasty).

Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Arterial Steno-Occlusive Disease: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial steno-occlusive disease to further evaluate the potential therapeutic role of encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 152 adult patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial steno-occlusive disease who were treated with encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis and intensive medical management across 3 tertiary centers in China between January 2011 and September 2019 were retrospectively included. The primary outcomes were defined as postoperative cerebrovascular events, including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The postoperative neovascularization was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by using angiography. Clinical, radiological, and long-term follow-up data were analyzed using Cox regression, logistic regression, and linear regression analyses. Primary outcome rates were 3.2% (5/152) within 30 days, 6.6% (10/152) within 2 years, 9.2% (14/152) within 5 years, and 11.1% (17/152) during a median 9.13 years follow-up. Initial infarction symptoms were positively associated with recurrent ischemic stroke. Additionally, posterior circulation involvement and coexisting cardiac disease indicated poorer neurological status, whereas encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis neovascularization efficacy was negatively associated with older age and vascular risk factors but positively associated with posterior circulation involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis plus intensive medical management appears efficacious and safe for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial steno-occlusive disease, with low perioperative risk and favorable long-term results. Further prospective trials are needed to verify its efficacy and determine the optimal patient selection criteria.

Rescue Therapy for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the association between rescue therapy (RT) and functional outcomes compared to medical management (MM) in patients presenting after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized prospectively collected and maintained data from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry, spanning from 2011 to 2021. The cohort comprised patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) with failed MT. The primary outcome was the shift in the degree of disability, as gauged by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Additional outcomes included functional independence (90-day mRS score of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of a total of 7,018 patients, 958 presented failed MT and were included in the analysis. The RT group comprised 407 (42.4%) patients, and the MM group consisted of 551 (57.5%) patients. After adjusting for confounders, the RT group showed a favorable shift in the overall 90-day mRS distribution (adjusted common odds ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-2.45, p < 0.001) and higher rates of functional independence (RT: 28.8% vs MM: 15.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.21-3.07, p = 0.005) compared to the MM group. RT also showed lower rates of sICH (RT: 3.8% vs MM: 9.1%, aOR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.28-0.97, p = 0.039) and 90-day mortality (RT: 33.4% vs MM: 45.5%, aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42-0.89, p = 0.009).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings advocate for the utilization of RT as a potential treatment strategy for cases of LVO resistant to first-line MT techniques. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these observations and optimize the endovascular approach for failed MT patients. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:343-355.

Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment in patients with established large infarct: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous trials confirmed the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute large core stroke, but the effect of EVT on outcomes in these patients based on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) in real-world clinical practice was unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of EVT versus standard medical treatment (SMT) in patients with large ischemic core stroke defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤5 based on NCCT alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with acute large core stroke at 38 Chinese centers between November 2021 and February 2023 were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome [modified Rankin Scale score (mRS), 0-3] at 90 days. Safety outcomes included 48 h symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 745 eligible patients recruited at 38 stroke centers between November 2021 and February 2023, 490 were treated with EVT+SMT and 255 with SMT alone. One hundred and eighty-one (36.9%) in the EVT group achieved favorable functional independence versus 48 (18.8%) treated with SMT only [adjusted risk ratio (RR), 1.86; 95% CI: 1.43-2.42, P <0.001; adjusted risk difference (RD), 13.77; 95% CI: 7.40-20.15, P <0.001]. The proportion of sICH was significantly higher in patients undergoing EVT (13.3 vs. 2.4%; adjusted RR, 5.17; 95% CI: 2.17-12.32, P <0.001; adjusted RD, 10.10; 95% CI: 6.12-14.09, P <0.001). No significant difference of mortality between the groups was observed (41.8 vs. 49.0%; adjusted RR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.77-1.07, P =0.24; adjusted RD, -5.91; 95% CI: -12.91-1.09, P =0.1).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with acute large core stroke based on NCCT in real-world, EVT is associated with better functional outcomes at 90 days despite of higher risk of sICH. Rates of procedure-related complications were relatively higher in the EVT+SMT group.

Futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion: assessment of the underlying etiology and the role of perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Futile recanalization (FR) after endovascular therapy (EVT) is common in basilar artery occlusion (BAO). The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of FR in the posterior circulation with an emphasis on the role of perfusion imaging and its relation to the underlying etiology.

METHODS

We included BAO patients who had pretreatment perfusion imaging and successful recanalization after EVT. Patients were dichotomized into futile and non-futile groups according to the favorable functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3). Perfusion abnormalities were assessed using an automated software for Tmax volume measurement and identification of hypoperfusion area based on Tmax>6 s involvement of the pons-midbrain-thalamus (PMT), cerebellum, and temporo-occipital lobe.

RESULTS

Of the 134 enrolled patients, the incidence of FR was 47.8% (64/134). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that a higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.066; 95% CI 1.011 to 1.125), a longer onset-to-recanalization time (aOR 1.002; 95% CI 1.001 to 1.004), incomplete recanalization (aOR 3.909; 95% CI 1.498 to 10.200), and PMT hypoperfusion (aOR 4.444; 95% CI 1.203 to 16.415) were independent predictors of FR. In patients with embolic occlusion of etiology, PMT hypoperfusion was associated with FR (aOR 8.379; 95% CI 1.377 to 50.994), whereas intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS)-related occlusion was not (p=0.587).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BAO, the likelihood of FR is associated with PMT hypoperfusion on pretreatment perfusion imaging. In particular, PMT hypoperfusion may be used as an imaging predictor of FR in patients with embolic cause of BAO.

Qualifying Event and Recurrence of Ischemic Stroke in Symptomatic Artery Occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of CMOSS

BACKGROUND

The authors aimed to elucidate the relationship between latest ischemic event and the incidence of subsequent ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic artery occlusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed the association between qualifying event-the latest ischemic event (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or stroke)-and the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic artery occlusion treated with medical therapy alone in CMOSS (Carotid or Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Surgery Study). The incidence of CMOSS primary outcomes, including any stroke or death within 30 days after randomization or ipsilateral ischemic stroke between 30 days and 2 years, between the bypass surgical and medical groups, stratified by qualifying events, was also compared. Of the 165 patients treated with medical therapy alone, 75 had a TIA and 90 had a stroke as their qualifying event. The incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between patients with a TIA and those with a stroke as their qualifying event (13.3% versus 6.7%, P=0.17). In multivariate analysis, the qualifying event was not associated with the incidence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke. There were no significant differences in the CMOSS primary outcomes between the surgical and medical groups, regardless of the qualifying event being TIA (10.1% versus 12.2%, P=0.86) or stroke (6.7% versus 8.9%, P=0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with symptomatic artery occlusion and hemodynamic insufficiency, the risk of subsequent ipsilateral ischemic stroke does not appear to be lower in patients presenting with a TIA compared with those with a stroke.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01758614.

CT perfusion for predicting intracranial atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery occlusion

Backgrounds and purpose

Identifying the underlying cause of acute middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) as intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) or embolism is essential for determining the optimal treatment strategy before endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline computed tomography perfusion (CTP) characteristics could differentiate ICAS-related MCAO from embolic MCAO.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical and baseline CTP data from patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy for acute MCAO between January 2018 and December 2022. Core volume growth rate was defined as core volume on CTP divided by onset to CTP time. Multivariate logistic analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors for ICAS-related acute MCAO, and the diagnostic performance of these predictors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Among the 97 patients included (median age, 71 years; 60% male), 31 (32%) were diagnosed with ICAS-related MCAO, and 66 (68%) had embolism-related MCAO. The ICAS group was younger (p = 0.002), had a higher proportion of males (p = 0.04) and smokers (p = 0.001), a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) (p < 0.001), lower NIHSS score at admission (p = 0.04), smaller core volume (p < 0.001), slower core volume growth rate (p < 0.001), and more frequent core located deep in the brain (p < 0.001) compared to the embolism group. Multivariate logistic analysis identified core volume growth rate (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.83, p = 0.01) as an independent predictor of ICAS-related MCAO. A cutoff value of 2.5 mL/h for core volume growth rate in predicting ICAS-related MCAO was determined from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 66%, and negative predictive value of 90%.

Conclusion

Slow core volume growth rate identified on baseline CTP can predict ICAS-related MCAO. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm and validate these findings.

Early neurological changes following endovascular therapy for acute stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) reduces functional disability in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the early neurological change after EVT may be limited in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD).

METHODS

We analyzed the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4 which was a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter registry of patients with LVO between 2015 and 2019. We compared the early neurological change, efficacy and safety of EVT for acute LVO in ICAD and other etiologies. The primary outcome was NIHSS improvement ≥10 points, and secondary outcome were NIHSS worsening ≥4 points 7 days after EVT, effective reperfusion rate, 30-day functional outcomes, and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 6710 enrolled patients, 610 (9.1%) had ICAD. The ICAD group was younger (mean 72.0 vs. 75.8 years) and predominantly male (63.4% vs. 56.0%), had lower NIHSS scores before EVT (median 16 vs. 18), and underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting more frequently (43.0% vs. 4.4%, 12.3% vs. 4.4%). In the ICAD group, NIHSS improvement was significantly lower (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95% confidence interval (95%CI)] 0.52 [0.41-0.65]), NIHSS worsening was significantly higher (aOR [95%CI] 1.76 [1.31-2.34]), and effective reperfusion was significantly lower (aOR [95%CI] 0.47 [0.36-0.60]). Fewer patients with ICAD had modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 30 days (aOR [95%CI] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]). The risk of acute reocclusion was more prominent in the ICAD group (aOR [95%CI] 4.03 [1.98-8.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in neurological severity after EVT was lower in patients with LVO and ICAD.

Endovascular Therapy and Outcomes Among Patients With Very Large Ischemic Core Stroke

Importance

The association of endovascular therapy (EVT) with outcomes is unclear for patients with very low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) within 24 hours of stroke onset.

Objective

To explore the association of EVT with functional and safety outcomes among patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2 scored with noncontrast computed tomography.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data from an ongoing, prospective, observational, nationwide registry including all patients treated at 38 stroke centers in China with an occlusion in the internal carotid artery or M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery within 24 hours of witnessed symptom onset. Patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2 between November 1, 2021, and February 8, 2023, were included in analysis. Data were analyzed October to November 2023.

Exposures

EVT vs standard medical treatment (SMT).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) of 0 to 3, at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours and mortality at 90 days.

Results

A total of 245 patients (median [IQR] age, 71 [63-78] years; 118 [48%] women) with ASPECTS of 0 to 2 were included, of whom 111 patients (45.1%) received SMT and 135 patients (54.9%) received EVT. The EVT group had significantly greater odds of favorable functional outcome at 90 days than the SMT group (30 patients [22.2%] vs 11 patients [9.9%]; P = .01; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.07 [95% CI, 1.29-7.31]; P = .01). Patients in the EVT group, compared with the SMT group, had significantly greater odds of any ICH (56 patients [41.5%] vs 16 patients [11.4%]; P < .001; aOR, 4.27 [95% CI, 2.19-8.35]; P < .001) and sICH (24 patients [17.8%] vs 1 patient [0.9%]; P < .001; aOR, 23.07 [95% CI, 2.99-177.79]; P = .003) within 48 hours. There were no differences between groups for 90-day mortality (80 patients [59.3%] vs 59 patients [53.2%]; P = .34; aOR, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.77-2.47]; P = .28). The results remained robust in the propensity score-matched analysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with very low ASPECTS based on NCCT within 24 hours of stroke onset, those treated with EVT had higher odds of a favorable functional outcome compared with those who received SMT. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess these findings.

Trends in cerebral venous thrombosis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

OBJECTIVES

We sought to provide updated incidence and trend data for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in the United States from 2016-2020, examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CVT, and identify predictors of in-hospital mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Validated ICD-10 codes were used to identify discharges with CVT in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Sample weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates, and census data were used to compute incidence rates. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was defined as January-May 2020. Trend analysis was completed using Joinpoint regression.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2020, the incidence of CVT increased from 24.34 per 1,000,000 population per year (MPY) to 33.63 per MPY (Annual Percentage Change (APC) 8.6 %; p < 0.001). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 4.9 % [95 % CI 4.5-5.4]. On multivariable analysis, use of thrombectomy, increased age, atrial fibrillation, stroke diagnosis, infection, presence of prothrombotic hematologic conditions, lowest quartile of income, intracranial hemorrhage, and male sex were associated with in-hospital mortality. CVT incidence was similar comparing the first 5 months of 2020 and 2019 (31.37 vs 32.04; p = 0.322) with no difference in median NIHSS (2 [IQR 1-10] vs. 2 [1-9]; p = 0.959) or mortality (4.2 % vs. 5.6 %; p = 0.176).

CONCLUSIONS

CVT incidence increased in the US from 2016 to 2020 while mortality did not change. Increased age, prothrombotic state, stroke diagnosis, infection, atrial fibrillation, male sex, lowest quartile of income, intracranial hemorrhage, and use of thrombectomy were associated with in-hospital mortality following CVT. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT volumes and mortality were similar to the prior year.

Outcome of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

INTRODUCTION

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) has been identified as a major cause of acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO).This study compared the characteristics and treatment outcomes in acute BAO patients with and without ICAD.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted at 115 People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam from August 2021 to June 2023. Patients with acute BAO who underwent endovascular treatment within 24 h from symptom onset were included (thrombectomy alone or bridging with intravenous alteplase). The baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and compared between patients with and without ICAD. Good functional outcome was defined as mRS ≤3 at 90 days.

RESULTS

Among the 208 patients enrolled, 112 (53.8%) patients were categorized in the ICAD group, and 96 (46.2%) in the non-ICAD group. Occlusion in the proximal segment of the basilar artery was more common in patients with ICAD (55.4% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001), whereas the distal segment was the most common location in the non-ICAD group (58.3% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Patients in the ICAD group were more likely to undergo treatment in the late window, with a higher mean onset-to-treatment time compared to the non-ICAD group (11.6 vs. 9.5 h, p = 0.01). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, distal segment BAO was negatively associated with ICAD (aOR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.32, p < 0.001), while dyslipidemia showed a positive association (aOR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.15-5.17, p = 0.02). There was a higher rate for rescue stenting in the ICAD compared to non-ICAD group (15.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of good outcome (45.5% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.91), symptomatic hemorrhage rates (4.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.25), and mortality (42% vs. 50%, p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

ICAD was a common etiology in patients with BAO. The location segment of BAO and dyslipidemia were associated with ICAD in patients with BAO. There was no difference in 90-day outcomes between BAO patients with and without ICAD undergoing endovascular therapy.

Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio as an independent predictor of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related emergency large vessel occlusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation between the monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) and intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related emergent large vessel occlusion (ICAS-ELVO) in acute ischemic stroke patients with endovascular thrombectomy.

METHODS

Included in this study were 215 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy. They were randomly assigned to training and testing datasets. The patients in training dataset (n=128) were divided into ICAS group (n=65) and embolism group (n=63). MHR was compared between the two groups. According to the cut-off value, patients in testing dataset (n=87) were divided into low-MHR group (n=54) and high-MHR group (n=33). MHR was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In training dataset, the proportion of male patients, diabetic patients and smokers in ICAS group was significantly higher than that in embolism group [(50 (76.9%) vs. 30 (47.6%), P=0.001; 29 (44.6%) vs. 14(22.2%), P=0.007; 37(56.9%) vs. 14 (22.2%), P=0.001; 37 (56.9%) vs. 14 (22.2%), P=0.001], while the mean age and the proportion of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and atrial fibrillation were significantly lower [(64.74±9.13 vs. 71.38±13.34, P=0.001; 6 (9.2%) vs. 14 (22.2%), P=0.043; 12 (18.5%) vs. 22 (34.9%), P=0.035; 5 (7.7%)vs. 56 (88.9%), P<0.001)]. The laboratory test results showed that monocyte count was significantly higher and high-density lipoprotein level was significantly lower in ICAS group than those in embolism group (0.61±0.26 vs. 0.45±0.13, P=0.001; 1.17±0.28 vs. 1.37±0.27, P=0.001). MHR in ICAS group was significantly higher than that in embolism group (0.55±0.26 vs. 0.34±0.11, P=0.001). In training set, MHR was found to be an independent predictor for the occurrence of ICAS-ELVO with an adjusted OR of 2.39 (95%CI 1.29-4.48, P=0.006). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of MHR was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.873. The optimal cut-off value of the MHR level was 0.46. In testing dataset, the rate of ICAS-ELVO in higher quartile was significantly higher than that in the lower quartile (81.8% vs. 33.3%, P<0.001). Patients with a low MHR had a higher rate of cerebral hemorrhagic than those with a high MHR.

CONCLUSION

MHR was associated with ICAS-ELVO in acute ischemic stroke patients with endovascular thrombectomy, and the higher level of MHR does benefit to differentiate ICAS from intracranial embolism, suggesting that MHR may prove to be an independent predictor for ICAS-ELVO.

iSPAN: Explainable prediction of outcomes post thrombectomy with Machine Learning

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning model and a novel clinical score for predicting outcomes in stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients aged over 18 years with an anterior circulation stroke treated at a thrombectomy centre from 2010 to 2020 with external validation. The primary outcome was day 90 mRS ≥3. Existing clinical scores (SPAN and PRE) and Machine Learning (ML) models were compared. A novel clinical score (iSPAN) was derived by adding an optimised weighting of the most important ML features to the SPAN.

RESULTS

812 patients were initially included (397 female, average age 73), 63 for external validation. The best performing clinical score and ML model were SPAN and XGB (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy 0.290, 0.967, 0.628 and 0.693, 0.783, 0.738 respectively). A significant difference was found overall and our XGB model was more accurate than SPAN (p < 0.0018). The most important features were Age, mTICI and total number of passes. The addition of 11 points for mTICI of ≤2B and 3 points for ≥3 passes to the SPAN achieved the best accuracy and was used to create the iSPAN. iSPAN was not significantly less accurate than our XGB model (p > 0.5). In the external validation set, iSPAN and SPAN achieved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (0.735, 0.862, 0.79) and (0.471, 0.897, 0.67) respectively.

CONCLUSION

iSPAN incorporates machine-derived features to achieve better predictions compared to existing clinical scores. It is not inferior to our XGB model and is externally generalisable.

Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke beyond the 24-h time window: Selection by target mismatch profile

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been established as a promising clinical intervention within a late time window of 6-24 h after symptom onset. Patients with slow progression, however, may still benefit from endovascular treatment beyond the 24-h time window (very late window).

AIM

The aim of this study is to report insight into the potential clinical benefits of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke beyond 24 h from symptom onset.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patients undergoing endovascular treatment for acute anterior circulation LVO ischemic stroke beyond 24 h. Participants were recruited between July 2019 and November 2020. Patients were selected based on the DAWN/DEFUSE 3 criteria (Perfusion-RAPID, iSchemaView) and patients receiving treatment beyond 24 h were compared to a group of patients receiving endovascular treatment between 6 and 24 h after symptom onset. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2). The secondary outcomes were shift modified Rankin Scale (mRS) analysis and successful reperfusion was defined by thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3 on the final procedure. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death at the 90-day follow-up. Propensity score (PS)-matched analyses were employed to rectify the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients were recruited with a median age of 63.0 (56.0-69.0) and 28.9% of all patients were females. Patients in the beyond 24-h group had a longer onset-to-groin time (median = 27.2 vs 14.3 h, p < 0.001) than those in the 6- to 24-h group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (median = 12.0 vs 15.0, p = 0.37), perfusion imaging characteristics (core: median = 11.0 vs 9.0 mL, p = 0.86; mismatch volume: median = 106.0 vs 96.0, p = 0.44; mismatch ratio = 6.46 vs 7.24, p = 0.91), and perfusion-to-groin time (median = 72.5 vs 76.0 min, p = 0.77). No significant differences were noted among patients between the two groups in the primary endpoint functional independence analysis (50.0% vs 46.6%, p = 0.77) and in the safety endpoint analysis: mortality (15.0% vs 11.0%, p = 0.71) or symptomatic hemorrhage (0% vs 3.42%, p > 0.999). In PS-matched analyses, there were no significant differences among patients between the two groups in functional independence (50.0% vs 54.8%, p = 0.74), mortality (16.7% vs 9.68%, p = 0.50), or symptomatic hemorrhage (0% vs 6.45%, p = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment can be performed safely and effectively in LVO patients beyond 24 h from symptom onset when selected by target mismatch profile. The clinical outcome of these patients was comparable to those treated in the 6- to 24-h window. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The impact of intraarterial, intravenous, and combined tirofiban on endovascular treatment for acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion

Background and purpose

Adjunctive tirofiban administration in patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) has been investigated in several studies. However, the findings are conflict. This study aimed to compare the effect of different administration pathways of tirofiban on patients undergoing EVT for acute LVO with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD).

Methods

Patients were selected from the ANGEL-ACT Registry (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Registry Study) and divided into four groups: intra-arterial (IA), intravenous (IV), and intra-arterial plus intravenous (IA+IV) and non-tirofiban. The primary outcome was 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcomes included the rates of mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3 at 90-day, successful recanalization. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and other safety endpoints. The multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential baseline confounders were performed to compare the outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1:1:1 ratio was conducted among four groups, and the outcomes were then compared in the post-matched population.

Results

A total of 502 patients were included, 80 of which were in the IA-tirofiban group, 73 in IV-tirofiban, 181 in (IA+IV)-tirofiban group, and 168 in the non-tirofiban group. The median (IQR) 90-day mRS score in the four groups of IA, IV, IA+IV, and non-tirofiban was, respectively 3(0-5) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 1(0-4) vs. 3(0-5). The adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.45-1.30, P = 0.330), with IV-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.78-2.36, P = 0.276), and with (IA+IV)-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.64-1.64, P = 0.912). The adjusted OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.98, P = 0.042) and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.26-0.94, P = 0.033). The other outcomes of each group were similar with non-tirofiban group, all P was >0.05. After PSM, the common odds ratio (OR) for 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale distribution with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.18-0.94, P = 0.036), and the OR for mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2 at 90-day with IA-tirofiban vs. non-tirofiban was, respectively 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11-0.74, P = 0.011) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09-0.67, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Intra-arterial administration of tirofiban was associated with worse outcome than non-tirofiban, which suggested that intra-arterial tirofiban had a harmful effect on patients undergoing EVT for ICAD-LVO.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03370939.

Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion due to Intracranial Stenosis: Identification, Management, Challenges, and Future Directions

This comprehensive literature review focuses on acute stroke related to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), with an emphasis on ICAS-large vessel occlusion. ICAS is the leading cause of stroke globally, with high recurrence risk, especially in Asian, Black, and Hispanic populations. Various risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and advanced age lead to ICAS, which in turn results in stroke through different mechanisms. Recurrent stroke risk in patients with ICAS with hemodynamic failure is particularly high, even with aggressive medical management. Developments in advanced imaging have improved our understanding of ICAS and ability to identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intervention. Herein, we focus on current management strategies for ICAS-large vessel occlusion discussed, including the use of perfusion imaging, endovascular therapy, and stenting. In addition, we focus on strategies that aim at identifying subjects at higher risk for early recurrent risk who could benefit from early endovascular intervention The review underscores the need for further research to optimize ICAS-large vessel occlusion treatment strategies, a traditionally understudied topic.

Glycoprotein inhibitors as a first line rescue treatment after unsuccessful recanalization of endovascular thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a major cause of stroke with a high rate of re-occlusion following mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Among the available rescue options, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) have shown promise as a potential therapeutic strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis examine studies exploring the use of glycoprotein inhibitors as a first-line treatment for refractory occlusion or high-grade stenosis following EVT in the setting of ICAD.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies using GPI as the first-line rescue treatment (GPI-rt) after failed thrombectomy or in the setting with high-grade stenosis (>50%) were included. The primary outcome of interest was good clinical outcomes (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes of interest were successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality by 90 days.

RESULTS

Our study processed 2111 articles, which yielded eight relevant studies for review, four single and four double arm. These studies comprised 763 patients, divided into GPI-rt (535 patients) and non-GPI-rt (228 patients) cohorts. The GPI-rt group had higher rates of mRS ≤ 2 at 90 days (58.5% vs 38.9%, p = 0.002) and lower mortality rates (7.8% vs 17.5%, p = 0.04) compared to the non-GPI-rt cohort. mTICI 2b-3 rates and rates of sICH were not significantly different between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

First line GPI-rt demonstrates significant clinical benefit and significantly lower mortality without a rise in rates of sICH. GPI are a potential first line rescue treatment of ICAD.

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke: New Evidence and Indications

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. In the past few years, endovascular treatment indications have expanded to include patients being treated in the extended window, with large ischemic core infarction, basilar artery occlusion (BAO) thrombectomy, as demonstrated by several randomized clinical trials. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) bridging to mechanical thrombectomy has also been studied via several randomized clinical trials, with the overall results indicating that IVT should not be skipped in patients who are candidates for both IVT and EVT. Simplification of neuroimaging protocols in the extended window to permit non-contrast CT, CTA collaterals have also expanded access to mechanical thrombectomy, particularly in regions across the world where access to advanced imaging may not be available. Ongoing study of areas to develop include rescue stenting in patients with failed thrombectomy, medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy, and carotid tandem occlusions. In this narrative review, we summarize recent trials and key data in the treatment of patients with large ischemic core infarct, simplification of neuroimaging protocols for the treatment of patients presenting in the late window, bridging thrombolysis, and BAO EVT evidence. We also summarize areas of ongoing study including medium and distal vessel occlusion.

Management of intracranial arterial stenosis during mechanical thrombectomy: Survey of neuro-interventionalists

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of emergent large vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial stenosis (intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion) remains unknown. The primary aim of this survey analysis was to measure variation in the clinical management of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion during mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

A survey was designed using a web-based survey-building platform and distributed via the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) websites for a response. Predictors of respondents' level of comfortability stenting were estimated using a binomial logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We received 105 responses to the survey. Most respondents (54.3%) practiced at an academic Stroke Center. Nearly half of the respondents (49%) had been practicing for 5 or more years independently after fellowship. An average of 54 mechanical thrombectomies were performed by each respondent annually. There was variation in the definition of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion, number of passes performed before pursuing rescue stenting, as well as intra and post-procedural antiplatelet management. Of respondents, 58% felt rescue stenting was very risky, and 55.7% agreed that there was equipoise regarding emergent angioplasty and/or stenting versus medical therapy for intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion. Respondents who encountered intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion more frequently thought that rescue stenting was less risky.

CONCLUSION

There is notable variability in the diagnosis and management of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion during mechanical thrombectomy. While most respondents felt rescue stenting was risky, the majority believed the benefit could outweigh the risk. The majority of respondents agreed that equipoise exists regarding the management of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion, highlighting the need for clinical trials in this rare patient population.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An Evolution of Trials

The last decade's progress in demonstrating the clinical benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke has transformed the paradigm of care for these patients. This review presents the milestones in implementing EVT as standard of care, demonstrates the current state of evidence, provides guidance for identifying the candidate patient for EVT, and highlights unsolved and controversial issues. Ongoing trials investigate broadening of EVT indications for patients who present with large core infarction, adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis, medium vessel occlusion, low NIHSS, and tandem occlusion.

What Is the Evidence for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Posterior Circulation Stroke?

Posterior circulation infarcts comprise approximately 25% of ischemic strokes but are less often treated with recanalization therapy and have longer treatment delays compared with anterior circulation strokes. Among posterior circulation strokes, basilar artery occlusion is associated with the most severe deficits and the worst prognosis. Endovascular thrombectomy is a standard of care for patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, but not until recently were the first randomized controlled trials on endovascular thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion published. Two of the trials were neutral, whereas two others showed better functional outcome after thrombectomy up to 24 hours of symptom onset compared with best medical treatment, which in most cases had low rates of intravenous thrombolysis. According to observational data, thrombectomy seems to be safe also in isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusions and might be an option for selected patients, even if its outcome benefit is yet to be demonstrated.

History of Neurointervention

In this review article, we aim to provide a summary of the discoveries and developments that were instrumental in the evolution of the Neurointerventional field. We begin with developments in the advent of Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and progress to cerebral aneurysm treatment, embolization in AVMs and ischemic stroke treatment. In the process we discuss many persons who were key in the development and maturation of the field. A pivotal aspect to rapid growth in the field has been the multidisciplinary involvement of the different neuroscience specialties and therefore we close out our discussion with excitement about ongoing and future developments in the field with a focus on treatments in the non-cerebrovascular disease realm.