Patent Foramen Ovale Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention: State-of-the-Art Appraisal of Current Evidence

Association between patent foramen ovale morphology and clinical outcomes following transcatheter closure

BACKGROUND

Anatomic variations of the patent foramen ovale (PFO) are commonly observed, yet limited research has investigated their impact on clinical outcomes following transcatheter closure. We aimed to explore the association between PFO morphology and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with cryptogenic stroke who underwent PFO closure were prospectively enrolled at a single center from September 2019 to April 2023. Patients were categorized into simple and complex groups based on PFO morphology. Composite events were compared between the two groups during a median follow-up of 24 months, including all-cause mortality, recurrent stroke, residual moderate or severe shunt, and symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 41.9 ± 13.0 years and 45.3% males. Ninety-one (36.8%) patients had complex PFO. These individuals were older (45.4 ± 12.5 years vs. 39.9 ± 12.9 years; P = 0.001), more males (56.0% vs. 39.1%; P = 0.010), had longer procedure times (54 ± 32 min vs 46 ± 29 min; P = 0.044), and had a higher rate of using delivery sheath-assisted crossing of the PFO (22.0% vs 12.8%; P = 0.040) than those with simple PFO. The estimated event rates were 27.9% and 11.3% (P = 0.006) in the complex and simple PFO groups, respectively (12.9 events and 5.2 events per 100 person-years; P = 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, device type, and left atrial diameters, complex PFO remained independently associated with composite events (HR 2.10, 95%CI 1.06-4.17, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with complex PFO may suffer from a higher risk of adverse events following transcatheter PFO closure.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: Brain-Heart Board Experience

Background and Objectives

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in approximately 25% of adult population. The prevalence of PFO is high in patients with cryptogenic stroke suggesting paradoxical embolism. PFO closure in carefully selected patients is an effective secondary preventive strategy in these patients. We report predictors of management recommendations by the multidisciplinary Board and their impact on outcomes.

Methods

Brain-Heart Board comprises vascular and interventional neurology and cardiology subspecialties (structural, electrophysiology, and cardiac imaging). Adult patients referred to the Board for consideration of PFO closure between October 2017 to March 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Demographics, comorbid conditions, risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score, event frequencies (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or stroke, intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], post-PFO closure cardiac arrhythmias), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year were compared between the groups (PFO closure vs medical management). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with management recommendation and chi-square tests to test differences in outcomes for patients according to management.

Results

Two hundred seventy patients (229 stroke; 41 TIA) were discussed by the Board for PFO closure. 119 (44.0%) patients were recommended for PFO closure of which 117 (98.3%) had evidence of ischemic infarct on imaging. In univariate analysis, age was similar (50 ± 11.9 vs 52 ± 12.8, p = 0.17), but RoPE score was higher in closure as compared with the medical management group (6 [IQR 5-7] vs 5 [IQR 4-7], p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, TIA as the index event was an independent predictor of Board recommendation against PFO closure (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.19, p < 0.05). Event frequency was low in both cohorts (5.9% vs 4.8%, p > 0.05) and comprised cardiac arrhythmias (6 cases of atrial fibrillation and 1 ICH in closure group; 1 TIA and 1 recurrent stroke in medical management group). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was similar in both cohorts (66.3% vs 70.7%, p > 0.05) at 1 year.

Discussion

Multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board provides a clinical practice model of collaborative care to ensure proper patient selection for PFO closure. TIA as the index event is associated with recommendation of medical management by the multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board.

Association between dietary intake of niacin and stroke in the US residents: evidence from national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 1999-2018

Objective

This study aims to explore the association between niacin intake and stroke within a diverse, multi-ethnic population.

Methods

A stringent set of inclusion and exclusion criteria led to the enrollment of 39,721 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Two interviews were conducted to recall dietary intake, and the USDA's Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) was utilized to calculate niacin intake based on dietary recall results. Weighted multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the correlation between niacin and stroke, with a simultaneous exploration of potential nonlinear relationships using restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression.

Results

A comprehensive analysis of baseline data revealed that patients with stroke history had lower niacin intake levels. Both RCS analysis and multivariate logistic regression indicated a negative nonlinear association between niacin intake and stroke. The dose-response relationship exhibited a non-linear pattern within the range of dietary niacin intake. Prior to the inflection point (21.8 mg) in the non-linear correlation between niacin intake and stroke risk, there exists a marked decline in the risk of stroke as niacin intake increases. Following the inflection point, the deceleration in the decreasing trend of stroke risk with increasing niacin intake becomes evident. The inflection points exhibit variations across diverse populations.

Conclusion

This investigation establishes a negative nonlinear association between niacin intake and stroke in the broader American population.

Extended Computed Tomography Angiography for the Successful Diagnosis of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac imaging is one of the main components of the etiological investigation of ischemic strokes. However, basic and advanced cardiac imaging remain underused in most stroke centers globally. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the supra-aortic and intracranial arteries is the most frequent imaging modality applied during the evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke to identify the presence of a large vessel occlusion. Recent evidence from retrospective observational studies has shown a high detection of cardiac thrombi, ranging from 6.6 to 17.4%, by extending a CTA a few cm below the carina to capture cardiac images. However, this approach has never been prospectively compared against usual care in a randomized controlled trial. The Extended Computed Tomography Angiography for the Successful Screening of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA (DAYLIGHT) prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluates whether an extended CTA (eCTA) + standard-of-care stroke workup results in higher detection rates of cardiac and aortic source of embolism compared to standard-of-care CTA (sCTA) + standard-of-care stroke workup.

METHODS

DAYLIGHT is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint trial, aiming to recruit 830 patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) being assessed under acute code stroke at the emergency department or at a dedicated urgent stroke prevention clinic. Patients are randomized 1:1 to eCTA versus sCTA. The eCTA expands image acquisition caudally, 6 cm below the carina. All patients receive standard-of-care cardiac imaging and diagnostic stroke workup. The primary efficacy endpoint is the diagnosis of a cardioaortic thrombus after at least 30 days of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint is door-to-CTA completion time. The diagnosis of a qualifying ischemic stroke or TIA is independently adjudicated by a stroke neurologist, blinded to the study arm allocation. Patients without an adjudicated ischemic stroke or TIA are excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome events are adjudicated by a board-certified radiologist with subspecialty training in cardiothoracic radiology and a cardiologist with formal training in cardiac imaging. The primary analysis is performed according to the modified intention-to-diagnose principle and without adjustment by logistic regression models. Results are presented with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

CONCLUSION

The DAYLIGHT trial will provide evidence on whether extending a CTA to include the heart results in an increased detection of cardioaortic thrombi compared to standard-of-care stroke workup.

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Special Clinical Situations: More Questions Than Answers?

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the foetal circulation resulting from incomplete occlusion of the septum primum and septum secundum. Although prevalent in about 25% of the population, it mainly remains asymptomatic. However, its clinical significance in situations such as cryptogenic stroke, migraine, and decompression illness (DCI) has been well described. Recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure over pharmacological therapy alone for secondary stroke prevention in carefully selected patients. Notably, these trials have excluded older patients or those with concurrent thrombophilia. Furthermore, the role of closure in other clinical conditions associated with PFO, like decompression sickness (DCS) and migraines, remains under investigation. Our review aims to summarise the existing literature regarding epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, optimal management, and closure indications for these special patient groups.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after stroke

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with cryptogenic ischaemic stroke. Potential stroke mechanisms include paradoxical embolism from a venous clot which traverses the PFO, in situ clot formation within the PFO, and atrial arrhythmias due to electrical signalling disruption. The purpose of this guideline is to provide recommendations for diagnosing, treating, and long-term managing patients with ischaemic stroke and PFO. Conversely, Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) was not considered an index event in this context because only one RCT involved TIA patients. However, this subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between TIA and stroke outcomes. The working group identified questions and outcomes, graded evidence, and developed recommendations following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for guideline development. This document underwent peer-review by independent experts and members of the ESO Guideline Board and Executive Committee. The working group acknowledges the current evidentiary gap in delineating an unequivocal diagnostic algorithm for the detection of PFO. Although transoesophageal echocardiography is conventionally held as the most accurate diagnostic tool for PFO identification, its status as the 'gold standard' remains unsubstantiated by rigorously validated evidence. We found high-quality evidence to recommend PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy in selected patients aged 18-60 years in whom no other evident cause of stroke is found but a PFO (i.e. PFO-associated stroke). The PASCAL classification system can be used to select such candidates for PFO closure. Patients with both a large right-to-left shunt and an atrial septal aneurysm benefit most from PFO closure. There is insufficient evidence to make an evidence-based recommendation on PFO closure in patients older than 60 and younger than 18 years. We found low quality evidence to suggest against PFO closure in patients with unlikely PFO-related stroke according to the PASCAL classification, except in specific scenarios (Expert Consensus). We suggest against long-term anticoagulation in patients with PFO-associated stroke unless anticoagulation is indicated for other medical reasons. Regarding the long-term AF monitoring after PFO closure, the working group concluded that there remains significant uncertainty regarding the risks and benefits associated with the use of long-term cardiac monitoring, such as implantable loop recorders. This document provides additional guidance, in the form of evidence-based recommendations or expert consensus statements, on diagnostic methods for PFO detection, and medical management after PFO closure.