Systemic corticosteriod rapidly reverses bronchodilator subsensitivity induced by formoterol in asthmatic patients

Budesonide/Formoterol or Budesonide/Albuterol as Anti-Inflammatory Reliever Therapy for Asthma

Overuse of reliever as short-acting beta-agonist and associated underuse of controller as inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) administered via separate inhalers results in worse asthma outcomes. Such discordance can be obviated by combining both controller and reliever in the same inhaler. So-called anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy comprises the use of a single inhaler containing an ICS such as budesonide (BUD) in conjunction with a reliever as either albuterol (ALB) or formoterol (FORM), to be used on demand, with variable dosing driven by asthma symptoms in a flexible patient-centered regimen. Global guidelines now support the use of BUD-ALB as AIR therapy to reduce exacerbations, either on its own in mild asthma or in conjunction with fixed-dose maintenance ICS-long-acting beta-agonist in moderate to severe asthma. Using BUD-FORM on its own allows patients to seamlessly move in an intuitive flexible fashion between AIR and maintenance and reliever therapy, by stepping up and down the dosing escalator across a spectrum of asthma severities. Head-to-head clinical studies are indicated to compare BUD-FORM versus BUD-ALB as AIR in mild asthma, and also BUD-FORM as maintenance and reliever therapy versus BUD-ALB as AIR plus maintenance ICS-long-acting beta-agonist in moderate to severe asthma. Patients should be encouraged to make an informed decision in conjunction with their health care professional regarding the best therapeutic option tailored to their individual needs, which in turn is likely to result in long-term compliance and associated optimal asthma control.

Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future

Asthma has been recognised as a respiratory disorder for millennia and the focus of targeted drug development for the last 120 years. Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, is caused by exposure to tobacco smoke and other noxious particles and exerts a substantial economic and social burden. This chapter reviews the development of the treatments of asthma and COPD particularly focussing on the β-agonists, from the isolation of adrenaline, through the development of generations of short- and long-acting β-agonists. It reviews asthma death epidemics, considers the intrinsic efficacy of clinical compounds, and charts the improvement in selectivity and duration of action that has led to our current medications. Important β2-agonist compounds no longer used are considered, including some with additional properties, and how the different pharmacological properties of current β2-agonists underpin their different places in treatment guidelines. Finally, it concludes with a look forward to future developments that could improve the β-agonists still further, including extending their availability to areas of the world with less readily accessible healthcare.

The Changing Asthma Management Landscape and Need for Appropriate SABA Prescription

Short-acting β2 agonists (SABAs) have been a mainstay of asthma treatment since the 1950s, and have been mainly recommended as-needed for symptom relief alongside daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance treatment for the past 30 years. However, patient adherence to regular ICS-based anti-inflammatory maintenance therapy is frequently poor, leading to SABA overuse for symptom relief and associated poor outcomes. At present, there is a lack of consensus between treatment guidelines on how SABA should be used, and as-needed ICS-formoterol is suggested by some as an alternative reliever therapy. Here, we examine the pharmacology and current use of inhaled SABAs, identify that regular dosing of ICS can encourage appropriate SABA use, and appraise the evidence used to support the changing reliever treatment recommendations. We conclude that SABA continues to play an important role in the asthma management landscape, and give our views on how it should be used in patients with mild-moderate asthma, to complement regular ICS-based maintenance treatment.

Corticosteroid Responsiveness Following Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma-A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial (MAPLE)

BACKGROUND

Mepolizumab inhibits IL-5 activity and reduces exacerbation frequency and maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Some patients remain dependent on OCS despite anti-IL-5 treatment, suggesting residual corticosteroid-responsive mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical and anti-inflammatory effects of OCS in patients with SEA on mepolizumab.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/d, maximum 40 mg/d, for 14 ± 2 days) in adults with SEA after 12 or more weeks of mepolizumab. We compared change in asthma symptoms, quality of life, lung function measured by spirometry and airwave oscillometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and blood and sputum eosinophil cell count after prednisolone and placebo treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients completed the study. Prednisolone did not improve 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (mean difference in change for prednisolone vs placebo, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.58 to 0.11), mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (0.03; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.42), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (0.24; 95% CI, -3.20 to 3.69), or Visual Analogue Scale scores for overall asthma symptoms (0.11; 95% CI, -0.58 to 0.80). The mean difference for FEV₁ in favor of prednisolone was 105 mL (95% CI, -4 to 213 mL); forced expiratory flow at 25% and 75% 484 mL/s (95% CI, 151 to 816 mL/s); fractional exhaled nitric oxide reduction 41% (95% CI, 25% to 54%); blood eosinophil count reduction 49% (95% CI, 31% to 62%); and percentage of sputum eosinophil reduction 71% (95% CI, 26% to 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

OCS improved small-airway obstruction and reduced biomarkers of type 2 inflammation but had no significant effect on symptoms or quality of life in patients with SEA receiving treatment with mepolizumab.

Benefit:Risk Profile of Budesonide in Obstructive Airways Disease

Airway inflammation is a major contributing factor in both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and represents an important target for treatment. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as monotherapy or in combination therapy with long-acting β₂-agonists or long-acting muscarinic antagonists are used extensively in the treatment of asthma and COPD. The development of ICS for their anti-inflammatory properties progressed through efforts to increase topical potency and minimise systemic potency and through advances in inhaled delivery technology. Budesonide is a potent, non-halogenated ICS that was developed in the early 1970s and is now one of the most widely used lung medicines worldwide. Inhaled budesonide's physiochemical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties allow it to reach a rapid and high airway efficacy due to its more balanced relationship between water solubility and lipophilicity. When absorbed from the airways and lung tissue, its moderate lipophilicity shortens systemic exposure, and its unique property of intracellular esterification acts like a sustained release mechanism within airway tissues, contributing to its airway selectivity and a low risk of adverse events. There is a large volume of clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of budesonide, both alone and in combination with the fast- and long-acting β₂-agonist formoterol, as maintenance therapy in patients with asthma and with COPD. The combination of budesonide/formoterol can also be used as an as-needed reliever with anti-inflammatory properties, with or without regular maintenance for asthma, a novel approach that is already approved by some country-specific regulatory authorities and currently recommended in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Budesonide remains one of the most well-established and versatile of the inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs. This narrative review provides a clinical reappraisal of the benefit:risk profile of budesonide in the management of asthma and COPD.

Future perspectives of anticholinergics for the treatment of asthma in adults and children

Despite major advances in therapeutic interventions and the availability of detailed treatment guidelines, a high proportion of patients with symptomatic asthma remain uncontrolled. Asthma management is largely guided by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy and is based on a backbone of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy with the use of additional therapies to achieve disease control. Inhaled long-acting bronchodilators alone and in combination are the preferred add-on treatment options. Although long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a relatively recent addition to disease management recommendations for asthma, tiotropium has been extensively studied in a large clinical trial program. In Europe and the United States, tiotropium is approved for patients aged ≥6 years and uncontrolled on medium- to high-dose ICS/long-acting β2-agonists at GINA Steps 4 and 5 with a history of exacerbations. Evidence supports the efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® in adults in terms of lung function and asthma control, with a safety profile comparable with that of placebo across a range of asthma severities. Similarly, clinical trials in patients aged 1-17 years have shown improvements in lung function and trends toward improved asthma control. Furthermore, its efficacy makes tiotropium relatively easy to incorporate into routine clinical practice, irrespective of allergic status and without the need for patient phenotyping. Tiotropium is a cost-effective treatment that may offer an important alternative to other, more expensive add-on therapies. This review discusses the potential future position of LAMAs in clinical practice by considering the continuously evolving evidence. Prominence is given to tiotropium, the only LAMA supported by a structured clinical trial program in asthma to date, while also considering other recommended treatment options for patients with uncontrolled asthma. The importance of effective patient/caregiver-clinician communication and shared decision-making in enhancing treatment adherence is also highlighted.

Pharmacogenetics of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in asthma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) are recommended in asthma therapy; however, not all asthma patients respond well to LABA. We performed a systematic review on genetic variants associated with LABA response in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Articles published until April 2017 were searched by two authors using PubMed and EMBASE. Pharmacogenetic studies in patients with asthma and LABA response as an outcome were included.

RESULTS

In total, 33 studies were included in this systematic review; eight focused on children (n = 6051). Nineteen studies were clinical trials, while 14 were observational studies. Studies used different outcomes to define LABA response, for example, lung function measurements (FEV₁ , PEF, MMEF, FVC), exacerbations, quality of life, and asthma symptoms. Most studies (n = 30) focused on the ADRB2 gene, encoding the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Thirty studies (n = 14 874) addressed ADRB2 rs1042713, 7 ADRB2 rs1042714 (n = 1629), and 3 ADRB2 rs1800888 (n = 1892). The association of ADRB2 rs1042713 and rs1800888 with LABA response heterogeneity was successfully replicated. Other variants were only studied in three studies but not replicated. One study focused on the ADCY9 gene. Five studies and a meta-analysis found an increased risk of exacerbations in pediatrics using LABA carrying one or two A alleles (OR 1.52 [1.17; 1.99]). These results were not confirmed in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRB2 rs1042713 variant is most consistently associated with response to LABA in children but not adults. To assess the clinical value of ADRB2 rs1042713 in children with asthma using LABA, a randomized clinical trial with well-defined outcomes is needed.

Effect of adjusting the combination of budesonide/formoterol on the alleviation of asthma symptoms

Background

The combination of budesonide + formoterol (BFC) offers the advantages of dose adjustment in a single inhaler according to asthma symptoms. We analyzed the relationship between asthma symptoms in terms of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and dose adjustment by the patient.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients with asthma who used BFC for alleviation of their symptoms (12 men, 16 women; 60 years old) were instructed that the inhaled BFC dose could be increased to a maximum of 8 inhalations per day according to symptom severity. Patients measured and recorded PEF every morning and evening in their asthma diary along with their symptoms and the dose of drugs taken.

Results

Sixteen of the 28 patients increased their dose for asthma symptoms. The time to recovery from the asthma symptoms was significantly shorter when cough was the only symptom present compared with dyspnea or wheeze (1.4 vs. 5.3 or 6.6 days, p < 0.05) and when they had only one symptom compared with two or three symptoms (1.3 vs. 5.7 or 10.5, p < 0.01). The relationship between PEF (% of personal best) when the dose was increased (Y) and the days for the increased dose to achieve a PEF greater than PEF in the symptom-free state (X) was determined to be Y = - 0.591X + 89.2 (r² = 0.299, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

As a guide for increasing the BFC dose when patients with mild asthma have asthma symptoms, the dose should be increased when cough is present or PEF is decreased to 88.9% (i.e., X = 0.5).

Tiotropium for the Treatment of Asthma: Patient Selection and Perspectives

Asthma is a chronic disease of airway inflammation with a large global burden. Despite established, guideline-based stepwise therapy, a significant proportion of patients remain symptomatic and poorly controlled. As such, there is a need for additional safe, effective, convenient, and cost-effective therapies that can be broadly applied across a range of asthma phenotypes. Tiotropium is a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) that leads to bronchodilation by blocking endogenous acetylcholine receptors in the airways. Tiotropium has long been approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and it has recently been recognized for its safety and efficacy in improving lung function and controlling asthma. Evidence from several Phase III trials in the adult and paediatric population has shown that tiotropium is well tolerated and significantly improves a range of endpoints as an add-on treatment to ICS therapy, regardless of baseline characteristics and clinical phenotypes. Consequently, regulatory authorities worldwide have recently licensed tiotropium as the only LAMA approved for the treatment of asthma. This review provides an overview of safety and efficacy data and discusses the use of tiotropium in patients across the range of asthma severities, ages, and phenotypes.

The evolving role of tiotropium in asthma

Tiotropium is a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) that exerts its bronchodilatory effect by blocking endogenous acetylcholine receptors in the airways. Its safety and efficacy are well established for the treatment of COPD, and it is now being recognized for its role in improving lung function and control in asthma. This review discusses the evolving role of tiotropium delivered by the Respimat® in patients across the range of asthma severities and ages, and provides an overview of safety and efficacy data. Tiotropium is the only LAMA currently approved for the treatment of asthma, and evidence from a large-scale clinical trial program, including several Phase III studies in adults, has demonstrated that tiotropium improves lung function and asthma control, with a safety profile comparable with that of placebo. Clinical trials in adolescent patients (aged 12-17 years) have also shown improvements in lung function and trends toward improved asthma control. Of note, the efficacy and safety profiles are consistent regardless of baseline characteristics and phenotype. Given the large and growing body of evidence, it is likely that as clinical experience with tiotropium increases, this treatment may possibly emerge as the key choice for add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists, and in patients who do not tolerate long-acting bronchodilators or other medications, in the future.

Bronchoprotective tolerance with indacaterol is not modified by concomitant tiotropium in persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Tiotropium is a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), licensed as triple therapy with inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA). There may be a synergistic benefit between LAMA and LABA as a consequence of receptor cross-talk, which in turn could modify beta-2 receptor downregulation and associated tolerance induced by LABA.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize this mechanism may result in a reduction of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) when using triple therapy.

METHODS

We evaluated 14 non-smoking asthmatics using an open-label, randomized crossover design. ICS with Indacaterol and Tiotropium (IND/TIO) vs ICS with Indacaterol (IND) over 4 weeks with challenge performed after first and last doses at trough.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference in mannitol sensitivity, expressed as the provocative dose of mannitol required to reach a 15% drop in FEV₁ , or mannitol reactivity, expressed as the response dose ratio (RDR: max % fall in FEV₁ /cumulative dose), when comparing ICS/IND/TIO to ICS/IND. Geometric mean fold differences for RDR comparing single and chronic dosing were 3.26-fold (95% CI 1.46-7.29) and 2.51-fold (95% CI 1.32-4.79) for IND and IND/TIO, respectively. Furthermore, salbutamol recovery post-challenge was significantly blunted after chronic compared to single dosing with either ICS/IND (P<.005) or ICS/IND/TIO (P<.05).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our data suggest that concomitant tiotropium does not modify the bronchoprotective tolerance induced by Indacaterol, in turn suggesting that cross-talk may not be clinically relevant when using triple therapy. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02039011.

Concerns with beta2-agonists in pediatric asthma - a clinical perspective

Beta2-adrenoreceptor agonists (β2-agonists) are extensively used in the treatment of childhood asthma. However, there have been concerns regarding their adverse effects and safety. In 2005, the FDA commissioned a "Black Box Warning" communicating the potential for an increased risk for serious asthma exacerbations or asthma related deaths, with the regular use of LABAs. In a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials, the incidence of severe adverse events appeared to be highest in the 4-11 year age group. Several mechanisms have been proposed regarding the risk of regular use of β2-agonists, such as masking patients' perception of worsening asthma, desensitization and downregulation of the β2-adrenoreceptor, pro-inflammatory effects of β2-agonists, pharmacogenetic effects of β2-adrenoreceptor polymorphisms and age related differences in pathophysiology of asthma. In this paper, we review β2-receptor pharmacology, discuss the concerns regarding treatment with β2-agonists in childhood asthma, and provide suggestions for clinical pediatric practice in the light of current literature.

Is Gly16Arg β2 Receptor Polymorphism Related to Impulse Oscillometry in a Real-Life Asthma Clinic Setting?

PURPOSE

We evaluated whether Gly16Arg beta2-receptor genotype relates to impulse oscillometry (IOS) in a real-life clinic setting.

METHODS

Patients with persistent asthma taking inhaled corticosteroid ± long-acting beta-agonist (ICS ± LABA) were evaluated. We compared genotype groups comprising either no Arg copies (i.e. GlyGly) versus one or two Arg copies (i.e. ArgArg or ArgGly). IOS outcomes included total airway resistance at 5 Hz (R5), central airway resistance at 20 Hz (R20), peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20), reactance at 5 Hz, area under reactance curve (AX) and resonant frequency (RF). In addition, we recorded ACQ-5 and salbutamol use.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve ICS-treated asthmatic patients (mean ICS dose 1238 µg/day), mean age 43 years, ACQ 2.34, FEV1 82 %, R5 177 % were identified-89 were also taking LABA. 61 patients were GlyGly, while 14 were ArgArg and 37 were ArgGly. There were no significant differences in IOS outcomes, ACQ or salbutamol use between the genotypes. The allelic risk (as odds ratio) for less well-controlled asthma (as ACQ > 1.5) was 1.1 (95 % CI 0.72-1.68) in relation to each Arg copy with a corresponding odds ratio for abnormal R5-R20 > 0.07kPA/l.s being 0.91 (95 % CI 0.57-1.44). 71 % of patients had an ACQ > 1.5 in the GlyGly group, versus 67 % in GlyArg/ArgArg group, with corresponding figures for abnormal R5-R20 > 0.07 kPa/l.s being 69 versus 73 %.

CONCLUSION

In a real-life clinic setting for patients with poorly controlled persistent asthma taking ICS ± LABA, we found no evidence of any relationship of Gly16Arg to IOS, ACQ or salbutamol use.

A common molecular motif characterizes extracellular allosteric enhancers of GPCR aminergic receptors and suggests enhancer mechanism of action

Several classes of compounds that have no intrinsic activity on aminergic systems nonetheless enhance the potency of aminergic receptor ligands three-fold or more while significantly increasing their duration of activity, preventing tachyphylaxis and reversing fade. Enhancer compounds include ascorbic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, cortico-steroids, opioid peptides, opiates and opiate antagonists. This paper provides the first review of aminergic enhancement, demonstrating that all enhancers have a common, inobvious molecular motif and work through a common mechanism that is manifested by three common characteristics. First, aminergic enhancers bind directly to the amines they enhance, suggesting that the common structural motif is reflected in common binding targets. Second, one common target is the first extracellular loop of aminergic receptors. Third, at least some enhancers are antiphosphodiesterases. These observations suggest that aminergic enhancers act on the extracellular surface of aminergic receptors to keep the receptor in its high affinity state, trapping the ligand inside the receptor. Enhancer binding produces allosteric modifications of the receptor structure that interfere with phosphorylation of the receptor, thereby inhibiting down-regulation of the receptor. The mechanism explains how enhancers potentiate aminergic activity and increase duration of activity and makes testable predictions about additional compounds that should act as aminergic enhancers.

IL-13 desensitizes β2-adrenergic receptors in human airway epithelial cells through a 15-lipoxygenase/G protein receptor kinase 2 mechanism

BACKGROUND

β2-Adrenergic receptor (β2AR) agonists are critical treatments for asthma. However, receptor desensitization can lead to loss of therapeutic effects. Although desensitization to repeated use of β2-agonists is well studied, type 2 inflammation could also affect β2AR function.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effect of the type 2 cytokine IL-13 on β2AR desensitization in human airway epithelial cells (HAECs) and determine whether 15-lipoxygenase-1 (15LO1) binding with phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1) contributes to desensitization through release of G protein receptor kinase 2 (GRK2).

METHODS

HAECs in air-liquid interface culture with or without IL-13 (48 hours) or isoproterenol hydrochloride (ISO; 30 minutes) pretreatment were stimulated with ISO (10 minutes). Cyclic adenosine 3, 5-monophosphate (cAMP) levels were measured using ELISA, and β2AR and GRK2 phosphorylation was measured using Western blotting. Short interfering RNA was used for 15LO1 knockdown. Interactions of GRK2, PEBP1, and 15LO1 were detected by means of immunoprecipitation/Western blotting and immunofluorescence. HAECs and airway tissue from control subjects and asthmatic patients were evaluated for I5LO1, PEBP1, and GRK2.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with ISO or IL-13 decreased ISO-induced cAMP generation compared with ISO for 10 minutes alone paralleled by increases in β2AR and GRK2 phosphorylation. GRK2 associated with PEBP1 after 10 minutes of ISO in association with low phosphorylated GRK2 (pGRK2) levels. In contrast, in the presence of IL-13 plus ISO (10 minutes), binding of GRK2 to PEBP1 decreased, whereas 15LO1 binding and pGRK2 levels increased. 15LO1 knockdown restored ISO-induced cAMP generation. These findings were recapitulated in freshly brushed HAECs from cells and tissue of asthmatic patients.

CONCLUSION

IL-13 treatment of HAECs leads to β2AR desensitization, which involves 15LO1/PEBP1 interactions to free GRK2, and allows it to phosphorylate (and desensitize) β2ARs, suggesting that the beneficial effects of β2-agonists could be blunted in patients with type 2 associated asthma.

Proof-of-concept evaluation of trough airway hyper-responsiveness following regular racemic or levosalbutamol in genotype-stratified steroid-treated persistent asthmatic patients

Asthmatic patients receiving ICSs (inhaled corticosteroids) may take frequent add-on therapy with salbutamol despite on-demand prescription. Frequent salbutamol use can be detrimental in asthma. The isomeric formulation of salbutamol and the B2ADR (β2 adrenoceptor) 16 genotype may also influence this phenomenon. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple crossover, proof of concept trial comparing 2 weeks of regular therapy with inhaled racemic salbutamol [200 μg q.i.d. (four times daily)], levosalbutamol (100 μg q.i.d.) or placebo on trough methacholine PC20 [provocative concentration causing 20% fall in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s)] 6 h post-dose (the primary outcome) in 30 persistent asthmatic patients (15 who were Arg16 homozygous and 15 who were Gly16 homozygous) all receiving ICSs. There was no worsening of AHR (airway hyper-responsiveness) at trough to methacholine after 2 weeks regular exposure to either racemic (P=0.53) or levosalbutamol (P=0.84) compared with placebo, nor between genotypes-as dd (doubling dilution) difference in methacholine PC20 from placebo [salbutamol/Arg16=0.36 dd [95% CI (confidence interval), -0.43, 1.15]; salbutamol/Gly16=0.01 dd (95% CI, -0.47, 0.49); levosalbutamol/Arg16=-0.01 dd (95% CI, -0.89, 0.87); and levosalbutamol/Gly16=0.28 dd (95% CI, -0.22, 0.77)]. Both active treatments improved morning PEF (peak expiratory flow) in Gly16 (P=0.04 overall) but not Arg16 (P=0.50 overall) patients, whereas evening PEF improved in both Gly16 (P<0.001 overall) and Arg16 (P=0.006 overall) patients. In conclusion, the regular exposure to either racemic or levosalbutamol for 2 weeks added to ICSs did not cause worsening of AHR at trough compared with placebo; with no difference seen between B2ADR 16 genotypes.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate chronic dosing effects of propranolol in asthma

RATIONALE

Unblinded studies have shown improvements in airway hyperresponsiveness with chronic nadolol in steroid-naive patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of chronic nonselective β-blockade as add-on to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial of propranolol in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma receiving ICS was performed. Participants underwent a 6- to 8-week dose titration of propranolol or placebo as tolerated to a maximum of 80 mg per day. Tiotropium was given for the first 4 to 6 weeks of each treatment period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary outcome was methacholine challenge. Secondary outcomes included histamine challenge, pulmonary function, mini-asthma quality of life questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and asthma control questionnaire (ACQ). Eighteen patients completed (mean [SEM]): age, 36 (4) yr; FEV1%, 93 (2); ICS, 440 (66) μg/d. No significant difference was observed in methacholine or histamine challenge after exposure to propranolol versus placebo. For methacholine challenge, the doubling dilution difference was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.56 to 0.63), P = 0.89. Albuterol recovery at 20 minutes after histamine challenge was partially attenuated by propranolol versus placebo: FEV1% mean difference, 5.28 (95% CI, 2.54-8.01), P = 0.001. After chronic β-blockade there was a small worsening in FEV1 % predicted of 2.4% (95% CI, -0.1 to 4.8), P = 0.055. No difference was found for ACQ or mini-AQLQ.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of chronic nonselective β-blockade in asthma, showing no significant effect of propranolol compared with placebo on either methacholine or histamine airway hyperresponsiveness and no change in ACQ or AQLQ. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01074853).

Effects of hydrocortisone on acute β-adrenoceptor blocker and histamine induced bronchoconstriction

AIMS

β-adrenoceptor blockers are avoided in asthma due to concerns of bronchoconstriction. We investigated the safety of acute exposure to propranolol in asthmatics, sequentially challenged with histamine to mimic an asthma exacerbation and evaluated the role of intravenous hydrocortisone in potentiating salbutamol reversibility.

METHODS

Persistent atopic asthmatics, requiring ≤ 1000 µg day(-1) budesonide, performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Following 10 mg or 20 mg of oral propranolol, patients received 400 mg intravenous hydrocortisone or placebo, followed by histamine challenge with nebulized salbutamol 5 mg and ipratropium 500 µg recovery.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients completed per protocol. Hydrocortisone did not potentiate salbutamol recovery post propranolol and histamine challenge vs. placebo (mean difference in FEV(1) 0.04 ml, 95% CI -0.07, 0.15, P= 0.417). β-adrenoceptor blocker induced bronchoconstriction was demonstrated by spirometry and impulse oscillometry. For the placebo visit, FEV(1) fell 4.7% 2 hours post propranolol (95% CI 1.8, 7.5, P= 0.008) whilst total airway resistance (R5%) increased 31.3% (95% CI 15.6, 47.0, P= 0.04). On both visits FEV(1) % and R5% returned to baseline after salbutamol post histamine.

CONCLUSION

Nebulized salbutamol and ipratropium produced a full recovery after propranolol and histamine induced bronchoconstriction, independent of hydrocortisone use. Since the greatest risk of β-adrenoceptor blockade is after first dose, our findings offer reassurance to those undertaking further evaluation of chronic β-adrenoceptor blockade as a potential treatment for mild-to-moderate asthma.

Pharmacology and therapeutics of bronchodilators

Bronchodilators are central in the treatment of of airways disorders. They are the mainstay of the current management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and are critical in the symptomatic management of asthma, although controversies around the use of these drugs remain. Bronchodilators work through their direct relaxation effect on airway smooth muscle cells. at present, three major classes of bronchodilators, β(2)-adrenoceptor (AR) agonists, muscarinic receptor antagonists, and xanthines are available and can be used individually or in combination. The use of the inhaled route is currently preferred to minimize systemic effects. Fast- and short-acting agents are best used for rescue of symptoms, whereas long-acting agents are best used for maintenance therapy. It has proven difficult to discover novel classes of bronchodilator drugs, although potential new targets are emerging. Consequently, the logical approach has been to improve the existing bronchodilators, although several novel broncholytic classes are under development. An important step in simplifying asthma and COPD management and improving adherence with prescribed therapy is to reduce the dose frequency to the minimum necessary to maintain disease control. Therefore, the incorporation of once-daily dose administration is an important strategy to improve adherence. Several once-daily β(2)-AR agonists or ultra-long-acting β(2)-AR-agonists (LABAs), such as indacaterol, olodaterol, and vilanterol, are already in the market or under development for the treatment of COPD and asthma, but current recommendations suggest the use of LABAs only in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid. In addition, some new potentially long-acting antimuscarinic agents, such as glycopyrronium bromide (NVA-237), aclidinium bromide, and umeclidinium bromide (GSK573719), are under development, as well as combinations of several classes of long-acting bronchodilator drugs, in an attempt to simplify treatment regimens as much as possible. This review will describe the pharmacology and therapeutics of old, new, and emerging classes of bronchodilator.

Tremor and β(2)-adrenergic agents: is it a real clinical problem?

Tremor is one of the most characteristic adverse effects following administration of β(2)-adrenergic agonists. It is reported by around 2-4% of patients with asthma taking a regular β(2)-adrenergic agonist and is induced by both short-acting and long-acting agents. Tremor associated with β(2)-adrenergic agonists is dose-related and may occur more commonly with oral dosing. The exact mechanism for tremor induction by β(2)-adrenergic agonists is still unknown, but there is some evidence that β(2)-adrenergic agonists act directly on muscle. An early explanation of the tremor was that β(2)-adrenoceptor stimulation shortens the active state of skeletal muscle, which leads to incomplete fusion and reduced tension of tetanic contractions. More recently, tremor has been correlated closely with hypokalaemia. A possible diverse impact of different modes of administration of β(2)-adrenergic agonists on tremorogenic responses has been suggested but solid evidence is still lacking. In any case, the desensitization of β(2)-adrenoceptors that occurs during the first few days of regular use of a β(2)-adrenergic agonist accounts for the commonly observed resolution of tremor after the first few doses. Therefore, tremor is not a really important adverse effect in patients under regular treatment with a β(2)-adrenergic agonist.

Pharmacogenetics of β2-agonists

Short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are both important for treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) because of their bronchodilator and bronchoprotective effects. However, the use of these agonists, at least for asthma, has generated some controversy because of their association with increased mortality. Pharmacogenetics is the study of genetically determined variation in response to medications, which might prove useful for target therapies in highly responsive patients, especially for more expensive therapies or those with increased risk of side effects. Variation in response to both SABAs and LABAs has been observed in patients with polymorphisms in the β2 adrenoceptor gene (ADRB2). This review summarizes results from various studies on the possible relationship between ADRB2 polymorphisms and the bronchodilator or bronchoprotective effects of inhaled β2-agonists. By assessing the ADRB2 genotype, the hope is that it will be possible to predict the responsiveness to chronic administration of β2-agonists. Genetic testing, however, is of limited usefulness at this stage for ADRB2 because the common variants identified thus far account for only a small proportion of the variation observed for given responses. Carefully performed and adequately powered clinical trials continue to be important for achieving the goal of pharmacogenetic approaches to therapy.

Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in healthy volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer

AIM

To compare a test version of HFA fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/SM) combination inhaler (Neolab, UK) with the reference product Seretide (GlaxoSmithKline, UK).

METHODS

An in vitro Anderson cascade impactor was used to compare the fine particle dose (<4.7 microm). Two separate randomized cross-over studies were performed to compare the systemic bioavailability of test vs. reference (T vs. R) formulations of FP/SM 250/25 microg pMDI in healthy volunteers. In study 1 blood pharmacokinetic analysis using oral charcoal block was performed over 24 h following a single dose of four puffs via pMDI alone. In study 2 systemic bioactivity was measured following single doses of four and eight puffs via a spacer device: serum potassium (K(+)) to reflect SM, and overnight urinary cortisol : creatinine (OUCC) for FP. An early pharmacokinetic profile was also assessed over 120 min.

RESULTS

The in vitro fine particle dose was similar for test vs. reference pMDI alone and via spacer. The results of both studies were consistent: No significant differences between formulations were seen in terms of FP kinetics. Analysis of SM kinetics revealed superiority of the test product. No significant dose-response or difference in T : R ratio was noted for OUCC. Fall in K(+) revealed a significant dose-response with a non-significant T : R ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro fine particle dose may not predict pharmacokinetic and systemic pharmacodynamic outcomes. Single dosing studies with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/25 microg via pMDI or with spacer showed pharmacokinetic equivalence with FP, but not SM. No significant difference between formulations was seen with either adrenal suppression or hypokalaemia.

Budesonide/formoterol combination in COPD: a US perspective

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a preventable and treatable disease of the lung caused primarily by exposure to cigarette smoke. Clinically, it presents with progressive cough, sputum production, dyspnea, reduced exercise capacity, and diminished quality of life. Physiologically, it is characterized by the presence of partially reversible expiratory airflow limitation and hyperinflation. Pathologically, COPD is a multicomponent disease characterized by bronchial submucosal mucous gland hypertrophy, bronchiolar mucosal hyperplasia, increased luminal inflammatory mucus, airway wall inflammation and scarring, and alveolar wall damage and destruction. Management of COPD involves both pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. Bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids are recommended medications for management of COPD especially in more severe disease. Combination therapies containing these medications are now available for the chronic management of stable COPD. The US Food and Drug Administration, recently, approved the combination of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg; Symbicort™, AstraZeneca, Sweden) delivered via a pressurized meter dose inhaler for maintenance management of stable COPD. The combination also is delivered via dry powder inhaler (Symbicort™ and Turbuhaler™, AstraZeneca, Sweden) but is not approved for use in the United States. In this review, we evaluate available data of the efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with COPD.

Relationship between hepatitis C virus infection and pulmonary disorders: potential mechanisms of interaction

Recently, an increasing number of reports have suggested that chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with pulmonary disorders. The effects of HCV on the lung may present as worsening of lung function and impaired responses to therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Moreover, chronic HCV infection may be associated with the pathogenesis of interstitial lung disease. It is believed that chronic HCV infection may contribute to the immune responses modulating the pathogenic processes underlying pulmonary disorders and, therefore, may lead to a wide spectrum of clinical presentations. Potential candidates for a role in these immune responses are the CD8(+) T lymphocytes and inflammatory cytokines. In this review, the effects of HCV on the lung and the potential mechanisms of interaction between chronic HCV infection and pulmonary disorders will be discussed.

TPI 1020, a novel anti-inflammatory, nitric oxide donating compound, potentiates the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol in conscious guinea-pigs

Inhaled corticosteroids are regularly co-administered with beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists. This study evaluates in conscious guinea-pigs the bronchodilator effect, alone or combined with salbutamol, of TPI 1020, a novel anti-inflammatory corticosteroid and nitric oxide (NO) donor derived from budesonide. Guinea-pigs received inhaled histamine (3 mM) and specific airway conductance (sG(aw)) measured. Responses to histamine were measured before and on the next day 15 min after a 15 min inhalation of vehicle, salbutamol, TPI 1020, budesonide, the NO-donor, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), or combinations of these drugs. Salbutamol and TPI 1020 caused concentration-dependent bronchodilatation measured as inhibition of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. TPI 1020-induced bronchodilatation was blocked by the guanylyl cyclise inhibitor, ODQ, indicating cGMP-dependence through released NO. While salbutamol at 80 microM did not exert significant bronchodilatation, significant inhibitions were observed when co-administered with TPI 1020, 0.11 and 0.33 mM. The combined effects of TPI 1020 and salbutamol lasted significantly longer than either drug alone. Inhaled budesonide was a weak bronchodilator and when co-administered with salbutamol there was enhanced bronchodilatation. Addition of the NO-donor, SNAP (0.1 mM), to the budesonide/salbutamol combination, also improved the inhibition of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. This study has shown that TPI 1020 potentiates the bronchodilator activity of salbutamol, and their combination lasted longer than either drug administered individually. Both the corticosteroid and NO-releasing activities of TPI 1020 appear to be required for the potentiation of salbutamol. Combination of TPI 1020 with a beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist may therefore be useful against acute bronchoconstriction episodes in asthma, and may offer an opportunity for reducing doses of inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists.

Use and safety of long-acting β2-agonists for pediatric asthma

Asthma guidelines recommend the use of long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) as the preferred add-on therapy for adults and children over 5 years of age when asthma is inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids alone. It has been suggested that LABA use may be associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality; however, this view is controversial since study findings have been inconsistent. While the safety profile of LABA monotherapy has been questioned, the value of concomitant inhaled corticosteroids to eliminate possible risks remains unproven. There is a paucity of efficacy and safety data for LABA use in children, and existing evidence is not sufficiently convincing to demonstrate a clear position for LABAs in the management of childhood asthma. The main aims of this article are to place LABAs in context in the management of childhood asthma and evaluate the current evidence for safety and efficacy.

Fluticasone reverses oxymetazoline-induced tachyphylaxis of response and rebound congestion

RATIONALE

Chronic use of intranasal decongestants, such as oxymetazoline, leads to tachyphylaxis of response and rebound congestion, caused by alpha-adrenoceptor mediated down-regulation and desensitization of response.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated if tachyphylaxis can be reversed by intranasal fluticasone propionate, and the relative alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor components of tachyphylaxis using the alpha(1)-antagonist prazosin.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, 19 healthy subjects received intranasal oxymetazoline, 200 microg three times a day for 14 days, followed by the addition of fluticasone, 200 microg twice a day for a further 3 days. At Days 1, 14, and 17, participants received a single dose of oral prazosin, 1 mg, or placebo with measurements made before and 2 hours later.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Outcomes evaluated were peak nasal inspiratory flow, nasal resistance, blood flow, and oxymetazoline dose-response curve (DRC). On Day 14 versus Day 1, inspiratory flow decreased (mean difference, 95% confidence interval) (-47.9 L x min(-1); -63.9 to -31.9; P < 0.001) and the DRC shifted downward (24.8 L x min(-1); 20.3-29.3; P < 0.001). On Day 17 versus Day 14, after fluticasone, inspiratory flow increased (45 L x min(-1); 30-61; P < 0.001) and the DRC shifted upward (26.2 L x min(-1); 21.7-30.7; P < 0.001). On Day 1, prazosin reduced inspiratory flow (-52.6 L x min(-1); -19.2 to -86) compared with baseline. This effect was abolished on Day 14 (7.9 L x in(-1); -41.3 to 25.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxymetazoline-induced tachyphylaxis and rebound congestion are reversed by intranasal fluticasone. Further studies are indicated to evaluate if combination nasal sprays of decongestant and corticosteroid are an effective strategy to obviate tachyphylaxis and rebound in rhinitis. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00487032).

Parent initiated prednisolone for acute asthma in children of school age: randomised controlled crossover trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a short course of parent initiated oral prednisolone for acute asthma in children of school age.

DESIGN

Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial in which episodes of asthma, rather than participants, were randomised to treatment.

SETTING

The Barwon region of Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Children aged 5-12 years with a history of recurrent episodes of acute asthma.

INTERVENTION

A short course of parent initiated treatment with prednisolone (1 mg/kg a day) or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the mean daytime symptom score over seven days. Secondary outcome measures were mean night time symptom score over seven days, use of health resources, and school absenteeism.

RESULTS

230 children were enrolled in the study. Over a three year period, 131 (57%) of the participants contributed a total of 308 episodes of asthma that required parent initiated treatment: 155 episodes were treated with parent initiated prednisolone and 153 with placebo. The mean daytime symptom score was 15% lower in episodes treated with prednisolone than in those treated with placebo (geometric mean ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98; P=0.023). Treatment with prednisolone was also associated with a 16% reduction in the night time symptom score (geometric mean ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00; P=0.050), a reduced risk of health resource use (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.86; P=0.010), and reduced school absenteeism (mean difference -0.4 days, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.0 days; P=0.045).

CONCLUSION

A short course of oral prednisolone initiated by parents when their child experiences an episode of acute asthma may reduce asthma symptoms, health resource use, and school absenteeism. However, the modest benefits of this strategy must be balanced against potential side effects of repeated short courses of an oral corticosteroid.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 26232583.

Effect of interleukin 13 on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and the bronchoprotective effect of beta-adrenergic bronchodilators and corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone affects airway bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and enhances bronchodilation and bronchoprotection induced by beta-adrenergic agonists. Interleukin 13 (IL-13), however, induces BHR.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypotheses that fluticasone inhibits BHR after either allergen sensitization or IL-13 administration and that fluticasone restores the bronchodilation and bronchoprotective effects of beta-agonists.

METHODS

The BHR to methacholine induced by IL-13 or ovalbumin was determined in BALB/c mice, and the provocation concentration of methacholine that caused an increase in enhanced pause in expiration of 200% (PC200) was calculated. We compared this response to methacholine in control mice with the response after treatment with IL-13 receptor alpha 2-IgGFc fusion protein (IL-13R alpha 2) (an IL-13 blocker), fluticasone, albuterol, salmeterol, fluticasone-albuterol, and fluticasone-salmeterol.

RESULTS

IL-13R alpha 2 (PC200, 17.59) completely blocks the BHR-induced effects of IL-13 (PC200, 7.28; P < .005). After IL-13 therapy (PC200, 5.90; P < .005), 1 mg/mL of albuterol (PC200, 3.38; P = .33), fluticasone (PC200, 4.59; P = .40), or fluticasone plus 50 microg/mL of salmeterol (PC200, 5.59; P = .11) showed no significant bronchoprotection. In nonsensitized mice, fluticasone plus 0.25 microg/mL of salmeterol (PC200, 25.90; P < .005) showed significantly greater bronchoprotection than did salmeterol alone (PC200, 11.08; P = .26). Fluticasone plus 0.3 mg/mL of albuterol and fluticasone plus 1 mg/mL of albuterol were significantly more protective than was fluticasone or albuterol alone in ovalbumin-sensitized mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effects of fluticasone, beta-agonists, and fluticasone plus beta-agonists are significantly less in IL-13-treated mice than in nonsensitized or ovalbumin-sensitized mice.

Sensitivity of disease parameters to flexible budesonide/formoterol treatment in an allergic rat model

RATIONALE

Clinical studies show that flexible dosing (maintenance and symptom-driven dose adjustments) of budesonide and formoterol (BUD/FORM) improves control of asthma exacerbations as compared to fixed maintenance dosing protocols (maintenance therapy) even when the latter utilize higher BUD/FORM doses. This suggests that dose-response relationships for certain pathobiologic mechanisms in asthma shift over time. Here, we have conducted animal studies to address this issue.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To test in an animal asthma-like model whether it is possible to achieve the same or greater pharmacological control over bronchoconstriction and airway/lung inflammation, and with less total drug used, by flexible BUD/FORM dosing (upward adjustment of doses) in association with allergen challenges. (2) To determine whether the benefit requires adjustment of both drug components.

METHODS

Rats sensitized on days 0 and 7 were challenged intratracheally with ovalbumin on days 14 and 21. On days 13-21, rats were treated intratracheally with fixed maintenance or flexible BUD/FORM combinations. On day 22, rats were challenged with methacholine and lungs were harvested for analysis.

RESULTS

A flexible BUD/FORM dosing regimen (using 3.3 times less total drug than the fixed maintenance high dose regimen), delivered the same or greater reductions of excised lung gas volume (a measure of gas trapped in lung by bronchoconstriction) and lung weight (a measure of inflammatory oedema). When either BUD or FORM alone was increased on days of challenge, the benefit of the flexible dose upward adjustment was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible dosing of the BUD/FORM combination improves the pharmacological inhibition of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and an inflammatory oedema in an allergic asthma-like rat model.

The safety of long-acting beta-agonists among patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids: systematic review and metaanalysis

RATIONALE

Inhaled long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), when used as monotherapy in asthma, may increase asthma-related hospitalizations, life threatening events requiring intubation/mechanical ventilation, and asthma-related deaths, but concomitant use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may modify this effect.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety of long-acting beta-agonists among patients with asthma using corticosteroids.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of parallel-group, blinded, randomized, controlled trials with at least 12 weeks of treatment addressing the impact of LABA on asthma-related and total morbidity and mortality in patients concomitantly using ICS. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ACPJC, and Cochrane (Central) databases, and contacted authors and sponsors.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We used a random effects model to pool results from different studies as odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) (OR < 1.0 favors LABA). The search yielded 62 relevant studies included in this analysis. Among over 29,000 participants (15,710 taking LABA, with over 8,000 patient-years observed in the LABA groups), there were three asthma-related deaths and two asthma-related, nonfatal intubations (all in LABA groups; <or= one event per study). Differences in asthma-related hospitalizations (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03) and asthma-related serious adverse events (mostly hospitalizations; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.54-1.03) failed to reach statistical significance. The OR for total mortality was 1.26 (95% CI, 0.58-2.74), reflecting 14 deaths in LABA groups and eight deaths in control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with asthma using ICS, LABA did not increase the risk of asthma-related hospitalizations. There were very few asthma-related deaths and intubations, and events were too infrequent to establish LABA's relative effect on these outcomes.

Beta2-agonists and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma, and individuals with this disease respond to a range of physiological and chemical insults that are otherwise innocuous to healthy subjects, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are characteristic of the asthma phenotype. BHR can be increased following exposure to environmental allergens in suitably sensitized individuals, pollutants, and certain viruses and can also be exacerbated by exposure to certain drugs, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and beta-blockers. Although beta2-agonists administered acutely remain the treatment for the symptoms of asthma, paradoxically, regular treatment with these drugs can result in an increase in BHR, and this has been suggested to contribute to the increase in asthma morbidity and mortality that has been reported by numerous investigators. This article highlights our current understanding of this phenomenon and examines the potential mechanisms responsible for this effect.

Clinical concerns with inhaled beta2-agonists: adult asthma

Inhaled beta2-agonists, when used regularly, cause subtle but significant worsening of asthma control. Overuse of inhaled beta2-agonists is associated with increased risk of death from asthma in a dose-response fashion. beta2-Agonists enhance airway responses to allergens, including induced airway hyperresponsiveness and induced airway inflammation. This is a plausible explanation for beta2-agonist-worsened asthma control. These direct effects of inhaled beta2-agonists, including increased airway response to allergen, tolerance, etc., may partially explain the association of overuse with asthma death. However, it is probable that the major reason for the association of beta2-agonists overuse and asthma mortality is an indirect effect. Inhaled beta2-agonists are effective relievers and preventers of bronchoconstriction and asthma symptoms but fail to treat the underlying pathogenesis, namely the airway inflammation. Thus, overuse may mask the true asthma severity and result in both an underappreciation and undertreatment of the disease. This would provide a rational explanation for the relationship of inhaled beta2-agonist use and mortality and also would fit the dose-response pattern. Inhaled beta2-agonists should be used exclusively as needed for relief of symptoms and their requirement should be infrequent: the need for excessive doses of beta2-agonists provides a useful marker of asthma (lack of) control.

Current issues with beta2-adrenoceptor agonists: pharmacology and molecular and cellular mechanisms

Beta2-adrenoceptors are widely, almost ubiquitously, expressed. Activation of these receptors on bronchial smooth muscle by short- and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists causes bronchodilation. Here, the beta2-adrenoceptor is linked by the G protein, Gs, to adenylyl cyclase, which increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), thus activating protein kinase A, which affects calcium levels and reduces the efficiency of myosin light-chain kinase, causing relaxation. Activation also entrains numerous acute and longer term downregulation responses affecting the number, location, and net efficiency of signaling of the receptor. Synthetic beta2-agonists are all "partial agonists," incompletely able to optimally stimulate cAMP signal transduction. However, compared with some cells (such as mast cells) involved in exercise- induced asthma induction, airway smooth muscle is privileged in that transduction efficiency is intrinsically high and the tissue is very resistant to complete downregulation. Glucocorticosteroids have broadly beneficial interactions with beta2-adrenoceptors. Researchers have recently discovered that the beta2-adrenoceptor may function as a homodimer and that it can form heterodimers with both the beta1- and beta3-adrenoceptors, and possibly other receptors. This further complicates interpretation of the effect of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms, but it is unknown whether this occurs in humans in vivo. Researchers have known for some time that strong contraction involving receptors coupled to the Gq G protein (e.g., cholinergic and leukotriene receptors via negative biochemical crosstalk), virus infection (via uncoupling), and inflammation (via kinases) can impair relaxation. Most recently, researchers have discovered that the beta2-adrenoceptor can also send potentially adverse signals after "atypical coupling" to Gq rather than Gs. The clinical implications of these uncouplings, crosstalk, and atypical coupling possibilities are not well-understood.

Interactions between corticosteroids and beta2-agonists

In vitro studies have demonstrated numerous ways in which beta2-agonists and corticosteroids may interact. Together with evidence of improved control of airway diseases using a combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists compared with treatment with either drug alone, this suggests that there may be a beneficial synergy between these two classes of medication. However, a positive interaction has not been clearly demonstrated in vivo. There is little evidence that beta2-agonists enhance the anti-inflammatory actions of inhaled corticosteroids. Corticosteroids do not enhance the bronchodilator response to beta2- agonists, nor do they appear to prevent the development of tolerance during chronic beta2-agonist treatment. The evidence that high doses of corticosteroids can reverse tolerance to beta2-agonists is conflicting. Most of the clinical benefits from combinations using inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists to treat asthma could result from additive or complimentary effects of the drugs on different parts of the disease process. Nevertheless, there are several studies in which the combination of a long- or short-acting beta-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid appears to have provided more than additive clinical benefits. The issue warrants further study. Combined inhaled corticosteroid/beta-agonist treatment will remain the basis of asthma management for the foreseeable future, and although the overall clinical benefit of the combination is no longer in doubt, there is more to learn about maximizing this benefit and minimizing adverse effects.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS). In this updated review we have included studies in which patients were either not on ICS as a group, or in which some patients, but not all, were on ICS to complement previous systematic reviews of studies where LABA was given in patients uniformly receiving ICS. We have focussed particularly on serious adverse events, given previous concerns about potential risks, especially of death, from regular beta-2 agonist use.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of LABA compared with placebo, in mixed populations in which only some were taking ICS and in populations not using ICS therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2005. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least four weeks duration, comparing a LABA given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma. Selection criteria to this updated review have been altered to accommodate recently published Cochrane reviews on combination and addition of LABA to ICS therapy. Studies in which all individuals were uniformly taking ICS were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies (representing 68 experimental comparisons) randomising 42,333 participants met the inclusion criteria. Salmeterol was used as long-acting agent in 50 studies and formoterol fumarate in 17. The treatment period was four to nine weeks in 29 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 38 studies. Twenty-four studies did not permit the use of ICS, and forty permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones (in three studies this was unclear). In these studies between 22% and 92% were taking ICS, with a median of 62%. There were significant advantages to LABA treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF and FEV1. They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. This was true whether patients were taking LABA in combination with ICS or not. Findings from SMART (a recently published surveillance study) indicated significant increases in asthma related deaths, respiratory related deaths and combined asthma related deaths and life threatening experiences. The absolute increase in asthma-related mortality was consistent with an increase of around one per 1250 patients treated with LABA for six months, but the confidence intervals are wide (from 700 to 10,000). Post-hoc exploratory subgroups suggested that African-Americans and those not on inhaled corticosteroids were at particular risk for the primary end-point of death or life-threatening asthma event. There was also a suggestion of an increase in exacerbation rate in children. Pharmacologically predicted side effects such as headache, throat irritation, tremor and nervousness were more frequent with LABA treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LABA are effective in the control of chronic asthma in the "real-life" subject groups included. However there are potential safety issues which call into question the safety of LABA, particularly in those asthmatics who are not taking ICS, and it is not clear why African-Americans were found to have significant differences in comparison to Caucasians for combined respiratory-related death and life threatening experiences, but not for asthma-related death.

Corticosteroids and adrenoceptor agonists: the compliments for combination therapy in chronic airways diseases

The combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists is increasingly used as maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The main effect of inhaled corticosteroids is thought to be mediated through suppression of airway inflammation, while long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists are thought to work by inducing bronchodilation. However, there is emerging data to indicate that these two classes of drugs interact positively with each other, leading to added or perhaps synergistic benefits for patients. Corticosteroids enhance the expression of beta2-adrenoceptor, thus providing protection against desensitization and development of tolerance to beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, which may occur with prolonged use of these medications. Long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, on the other hand, may amplify the anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids by accelerating nuclear translocation of the glucocorticoid receptor complex, and enhancing transcription and expression of steroid-inducible genes in pro-inflammatory cells. In clinical trials, corticosteroids in combination with long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists reduce exacerbation rates, and improve lung function and health status of patients with moderate to severe asthma or COPD beyond that achieved by individual component therapy. Their effects on mortality are unknown. There is a large clinical trial currently underway, which will provide mortality data by the year 2006. On balance, clinical evidence supports the use of combination therapy in moderate to severe asthma and COPD.

Clinical practice guidelines: medical follow-up of patients with asthma--adults and adolescents

The follow-up of patients with asthma should focus on asthma control (disease course over a number of weeks).

Past, present and future--beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in asthma management

The beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists) have been used to relieve bronchoconstriction for at least 5000 years. beta-agonists are based on adrenaline and early forms, such as isoprenaline, Lacked bronchial selectivity and had unpleasant side effects. Modern beta-agonists are more selective for the beta2-adrenoceptors (beta2-receptors) located in bronchial smooth muscle and have less cardiotoxicity. Traditional beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists), such as salbutamol, terbutaline and fenoterol, were characterised by a rapid onset but relatively short duration of action. While valuable as reliever medication, their short duration gave inadequate night-time relief and limited protection from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. beta2-agonists with longer durations of action, formoterol and salmeterol, were subsequently discovered or developed. When combined with inhaled corticosteroids they improved lung function, and reduced symptoms and exacerbations more than an increased dose of corticosteroids. However, tolerance to the bronchprotective effects of long-acting beta2-agonists and cross-tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of short-acting beta2-agonists is apparent despite use of inhaled corticosteroids. The role of beta2-receptor polymorphisms in the development of tolerance has yet to be fully determined. Formoterol is unique in having both a long-lasting bronchodilator effect (> 12 h) and a fast onset of action (1-3min from inhalation), making it effective both as maintenance and reliever medication. The recent change in classification from short- and long-acting beta2-agonists to rapid-acting and/or long-acting agents reflects the ongoing evolution of beta2-agonist therapy.

Long-acting beta2-agonists: comparative pharmacology and clinical outcomes

Salmeterol and formoterol are both long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists). They both provide excellent bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effects in patients with asthma but their are some differences between these two long-acting beta(2)-agonists in vitro and in vivo. Formoterol has a greater potency and intrinsic activity than salmeterol, which can become especially apparent at higher doses than that clinically recommended, and in contracted bronchi. Long-term use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists can induce tolerance, which can be partially reversed with corticosteroids. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have some anti-inflammatory effects in vitro, but data in vivo are less convincing. Compared with doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids improves symptom control in patients with asthma and reduces both the exacerbation rate of asthma and hospital admission rate. No enhanced airway responsiveness or loss of perception of dyspnea has been observed with the use of inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists. Monotherapy with long-acting beta(2)-agonists is not recommended.

Effect of reproterol either alone or combined with disodium cromoglycate on airway responsiveness to methacholine

Regular use of inhaled beta2-agonists might lead to tolerance as reflected in a loss of bronchoprotection. In vitro-data suggest that this might be prevented by disodium cromoglycate (DSCG). Therefore, we studied the effect of the beta2-agonist reproterol in combination with DSCG. In a cross-over design, 19 subjects with airway hyperresponsiveness inhaled either placebo, 1mg reproterol, 2 mg DSCG, or 1mg reproterol plus 2 mg DSCG 4x daily over 2 weeks. Treatment periods were separated by > or = 7 days. Before and at the end of periods, lung function and methacholine responsiveness were determined in the morning, and 6h later the bronchodilator effect and the protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Reproterol or DSCG or their combination did not exert detrimental effects on lung function, airway responsiveness, or bronchodilator capacity. However, bronchoprotection was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) after treatment with placebo, reproterol or reproterol plus DSCG, the respective changes being 0.59, 0.96 and 1.37 doubling concentrations. All changes were small as compared to intraindividual variability. In this model all treatments except with DSCG caused a significant but small loss of protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Thus, tolerance was not prevented by 2 weeks of additional treatment with DSCG, in contrast to in vitro findings.