Endogenous Excitatory Drive Modulating Respiratory Muscle Activity across Sleep–Wake States

Orexin receptor 2 agonist activates diaphragm and genioglossus muscle through stimulating inspiratory neurons in the pre-Bötzinger complex, and phrenic and hypoglossal motoneurons in rodents

Orexin-mediated stimulation of orexin receptors 1/2 (OX[1/2]R) may stimulate the diaphragm and genioglossus muscle via activation of inspiratory neurons in the pre-Bötzinger complex, which are critical for the generation of inspiratory rhythm, and phrenic and hypoglossal motoneurons. Herein, we assessed the effects of OX2R-selective agonists TAK-925 (danavorexton) and OX-201 on respiratory function. In in vitro electrophysiologic analyses using rat medullary slices, danavorexton and OX-201 showed tendency and significant effect, respectively, in increasing the frequency of inspiratory synaptic currents of inspiratory neurons in the pre-Bötzinger complex. In rat medullary slices, both danavorexton and OX-201 significantly increased the frequency of inspiratory synaptic currents of hypoglossal motoneurons. Danavorexton and OX-201 also showed significant effect and tendency, respectively, in increasing the frequency of burst activity recorded from the cervical (C3-C5) ventral root, which contains axons of phrenic motoneurons, in in vitro electrophysiologic analyses from rat isolated brainstem-spinal cord preparations. Electromyogram recordings revealed that intravenous administration of OX-201 increased burst frequency of the diaphragm and burst amplitude of the genioglossus muscle in isoflurane- and urethane-anesthetized rats, respectively. In whole-body plethysmography analyses, oral administration of OX-201 increased respiratory activity in free-moving mice. Overall, these results suggest that OX2R-selective agonists enhance respiratory function via activation of the diaphragm and genioglossus muscle through stimulation of inspiratory neurons in the pre-Bötzinger complex, and phrenic and hypoglossal motoneurons. OX2R-selective agonists could be promising drugs for various conditions with respiratory dysfunction.

The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on the Cardiovascular System: A Comprehensive Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an increasingly relevant cause of cardiovascular morbidity worldwide. Although the association between OSA and the cardiovascular system is well-known, the extent of its effects is still a topic of interest, including pathophysiologic mechanisms, cardiovascular sequelae, and OSA therapies and their effects. Commonly described mechanisms of cardiovascular etiologies revolve around sympathetic activation, inflammation, and intermittent hypoxia resulting from OSA. Ultimately, these effects lead to manifestations in the cardiovascular system, such as arrhythmias, hypertension, and heart failure, among others. The resulting sequelae of OSA may also have differential effects based on gender and age; several studies suggest female gender to have more susceptibility to cardiovascular mortality, as well as an increase in age. Furthermore, several therapies for OSA, both established and emerging, show a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and may even reduce cardiovascular burden. Namely, the establishment of CPAP has led to improvement in hypertension and cardiac function in patients with heart failure and even reduced the progression of early stages of atherosclerosis. Effective management of OSA decreases abnormal neural sympathetic activity, which results in better rhythm control and blood pressure control, both in waking and sleep cycles. With newer therapies for OSA, its effects on the cardiovascular system may be significantly reduced or even reversed after long-term management. The vast extent of OSA on the cardiovascular system, as well as current and future therapeutic strategies, will be described in detail in this review.

Chronic intermittent hypoxia attenuates noradrenergic innervation of hypoglossal motor nucleus

The state-dependent noradrenergic activation of hypoglossal motoneurons plays an important role in the maintenance of upper airway patency and pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH), a major pathogenic factor of OSA, contributes to the risk for developing neurodegenerative disorders in OSA patients. Using anterograde tracer, channelrhodopsin-2, we mapped axonal projections from noradrenergic A7 and SubCoeruleus neurons to hypoglossal nucleus in DBH-cre mice and assessed the effect of CIH on these projections. We found that CIH significantly reduced the number of axonal projections from SubCoeruleus neurons to both dorsal (by 68%) and to ventral (by73%) subregions of the hypoglossal motor nucleus compared to sham-treated animals. The animals' body weight was also negatively affected by CIH. Both effects, the decrease in axonal projections and body weight, were more pronounced in male than female mice, which was likely caused by less sensitivity of female mice to CIH as compared to males. The A7 neurons appeared to have limited projections to the hypoglossal nucleus. Our findings suggest that CIH-induced reduction of noradrenergic innervation of hypoglossal motoneurons may exacerbate progression of OSA, especially in men.

Interaction between Kölliker-Fuse/A7 and the parafacial respiratory region on the control of respiratory regulation

Respiration is regulated by various types of neurons located in the pontine-medullary regions. The Kölliker-Fuse (KF)/A7 noradrenergic neurons play a role in modulating the inspiratory cycle by influencing the respiratory output. These neurons are interconnected and may also project to brainstem and spinal cord, potentially involved in regulating the post-inspiratory phase. In the present study, we hypothesize that the parafacial (pF) neurons, in conjunction with adrenergic mechanisms originating from the KF/A7 region, may provide the neurophysiological basis for breathing modulation. We conducted experiments using urethane-anesthetized, vagotomized, and artificially ventilated male Wistar rats. Injection of L-glutamate into the KF/A7 region resulted in inhibition of inspiratory activity, and a prolonged and high-amplitude genioglossal activity (GGEMG). Blockade of the α1 adrenergic receptors (α1-AR) or the ionotropic glutamatergic receptors in the pF region decrease the activity of the GGEMG without affecting inspiratory cessation. In contrast, blockade of α2-AR in the pF region extended the duration of GG activity. Notably, the inspiratory and GGEMG activities induced by KF/A7 stimulation were completely blocked by bilateral blockade of glutamatergic receptors in the Bötzinger complex (BötC). While our study found a limited role for α1 and α2 adrenergic receptors at the pF level in modulating the breathing response to KF/A7 stimulation, it became evident that BötC neurons are responsible for the respiratory effects induced by KF/A7 stimulation.

The effects of atomoxetine and trazodone combination on obstructive sleep apnea and sleep microstructure: A double-blind randomized clinical trial study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

we aimed to compare the effects of atomoxetine and trazodone (A-T) in combination with placebo in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial study was conducted in adults with OSA referred to a Sleep Clinic. Participants with eligibility criteria were recruited. Patients were studied on two separate nights with one-week intervals, once treated with trazodone (50 mg) and atomoxetine (80 mg) combination and then with a placebo and the following polysomnography tests.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients with OSA completed the study protocol, 9(50%) were male, the mean age was 47.5 years (SD = 9.8) and the mean Body mass index of participants was 28.4 kg/m2 (SD = 3.4). Compared with the placebo, the A-T combination resulted in significant differences in AHI (28.3(A-T) vs. 42.7 (placebo), p = 0.025), duration of the REM stage (1.3%TST (A-T) vs. 13.1%TST (placebo), p = 0.001), and the number of REM cycles (0.8 (A-T) vs. 4.7 (placebo), p = 0.001), number of apneas (38.3 (A-T) vs. 79.3 (placebo), p = 0.011), number of obstructive apneas (37.2 (A-T) vs. 75.2 (placebo), p = 0.011), oxygen desaturation index (29.5 (A-T) vs. 42.3 (placebo), p = 0.022) and number of respiratory arousals (43.2 (A-T) vs. 68.5 (placebo), p = 0.048). This decrement effect did not change among those with a low-arousal phenotype of OSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The A-T combination significantly improved respiratory events' indices compared with placebo in patients with OSA. This combination is recommended to be assessed in a large trial. It could be an alternative for those who do not adhere to the standard available treatments for OSA.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Down syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at very high risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Current OSA treatments have limited effectiveness in this population. We evaluated the effectiveness of atomoxetine and oxybutynin (ato-oxy) to treat OSA in children with Down syndrome.

METHODS

Children ages 6-7 years old with Down syndrome and OSA participated in a double-blind crossover clinical trial evaluating two dose regimens of ato-oxy. Participants received low-dose ato-oxy (0.5 mg/kg atomoxetine and 5 mg oxybutynin) and high-dose ato-oxy (1.2 mg/kg atomoxetine and 5 mg oxybutynin) for 1 month in random order. The primary study outcome was change in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index. Health-related quality of life as measured by the OSA-18 as well as changes in sleep architecture were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants qualified for randomization and 11 participants had complete data at all points. Baseline obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 7.4 ± 3.7 (mean ± standard deviation), obstructive apnea-hypopnea index with low-dose ato-oxy was 3.6 ± 3.3 (P = .001 vs baseline), and obstructive apnea-hypopnea index with high-dose ato-oxy was 3.9 ± 2.8 (P = .003 vs baseline). No significant sleep architecture differences were present with ato-oxy. No significant difference in OSA-18 score was present. OSA-18 total score was 51 ± 19 at baseline, 45 ± 17 (P = .09) at the end of 4 weeks of low-dose ato-oxy, and 45 ± 16 (P = .37) at the end of high-dose ato-oxy therapy. The most common adverse effects were irritability and fatigue, and these were generally mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Ato-oxy is a promising treatment for OSA in children with Down syndrome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov; Name: Medications for Obstructive Sleep Apnea In Children With Down Syndrome (MOSAIC); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04115878; Identifier: NCT04115878.

CITATION

Combs D, Edgin J, Hsu C-H, et al. The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Down syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(12):2065-2073.

Drive versus Pressure Contributions to Genioglossus Activity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Rationale: Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. Objectives: For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. Methods: We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). Results: Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model R = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, βdrive:βpressure; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half (n = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., βdrive:βpressure > 2:1), and one-quarter (n = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., βdrive:βpressure < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %baseline/standard deviation of βdrive:βpressure; P = 0.004, adjusted analysis). Conclusions: Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.

Optical and pharmacological manipulation of hypoglossal motor nucleus identifies differential effects of taltirelin on sleeping tonic motor activity and responsiveness

Pharyngeal muscle activity and responsiveness are key pathophysiological traits in human obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and strong contributors to improvements with pharmacotherapy. The thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analog taltirelin is of high pre-clinical interest given its neuronal-stimulant properties, minimal endocrine activity, tongue muscle activation following microperfusion into the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN) or systemic delivery, and high TRH receptor expression at the HMN compared to rest of the brain. Here we test the hypothesis that taltirelin increases HMN activity and/or responsivity to excitatory stimuli applied across sleep-wake states in-vivo. To target hypoglossal motoneurons with simultaneous pharmacological and optical stimuli we used customized "opto-dialysis" probes and chronically implanted them in mice expressing a light sensitive cation channel exclusively on cholinergic neurons (ChAT-ChR2, n = 12) and wild-type mice lacking the opsin (n = 10). Both optical stimuli applied across a range of powers (P < 0.001) and microperfusion of taltirelin into the HMN (P < 0.020) increased tongue motor activity in sleeping ChAT-ChR2 mice. Notably, taltirelin increased tonic background tongue motor activity (P < 0.001) but not responsivity to excitatory optical stimuli across sleep-wake states (P > 0.098). This differential effect on tonic motor activity versus responsivity informs human studies of the potential beneficial effects of taltirelin on pharyngeal motor control and OSA pharmacotherapy.

Targets for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy: principles, approaches, and emerging strategies

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and serious breathing disorder. Several pathophysiological factors predispose individuals to OSA. These factors are quantifiable, and modifiable pharmacologically.

AREAS COVERED

Four key pharmacotherapeutic targets are identified and mapped to the major determinants of OSA pathophysiology. PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Target #1: Pharyngeal Motor Effectors. Increasing pharyngeal muscle activity and responsivity with noradrenergic-antimuscarinic combination is central to recent breakthrough OSA pharmacotherapy. Assumptions, knowledge gaps, future directions, and other targets are identified. #2: Upper Airway Sensory Afferents. There is translational potential of sensitizing and amplifying reflex pharyngeal dilator muscle responses to negative airway pressure via intranasal delivery of new potassium channel blockers. Rationales, advantages, findings, and potential strategies to enhance effectiveness are identified. #3: Chemosensory Afferents and Ventilatory Control. Strategies to manipulate ventilatory control system sensitivity by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are supported in theory and initial studies. Intranasal delivery of agents to stimulate central respiratory activity are also introduced. #4: Sleep-Wake Mechanisms. Arousability is the fourth therapeutic target rationalized. Evolving automated tools to measure key pathophysiological factors predisposing to OSA will accelerate pharmacotherapy. Although not currently ready for general clinical settings, the identified targets are of future promise.

Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea: targeting specific pathophysiological traits

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is multi-factorial and complex. Varying OSA's pathophysiological traits have been identified, including pharyngeal collapsibility, upper airway muscle reactivity, arousal threshold, and regulation of the ventilatory drive. Being CPAP of difficult tolerance and other interventions reserved to specific subpopulations new pharmacological treatments for OSA might be resolutive.

AREAS COVERED

Several existing and newly developed pharmacological drugs can impact one or more endotypes and could therefore be proposed as treatment options for sleep disordered breathing. With this review we will explore different pathophysiological traits as new targets for OSA therapy. This review will summarize the most promising pharmacological treatment for OSA accordingly with their mechanisms of action on upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and loop gain.

EXPERT OPINION

Only understanding the pathophysiological traits causing OSA in each patient and placing the disease in the framework of patient comorbidities, we will be able to evolve interventions toward OSA. The development of new drug's combinations will permit different approaches and different choices beside conventional treatments. In the next future, we hope that sleep specialists will select the treatment for a specific patient on the base of its pathophysiology, defining a precision medicine for OSA.

Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line and gold-standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Pharmacotherapy is not commonly used in treating OSA until recently. Combined noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents have been clinically applied for OSA patients with variable results. This meta-analysis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined regimen on OSA. A systematic literature search was performed up to November 2022 for the effects of the combined regimen on OSA. Eight randomized controlled trials were identified and systematically reviewed for meta-analysis. There were significant mean differences between OSA patients taking a combined regimen and placebo in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) [mean difference (MD) -9.03 events/h, 95%CI (-16.22, -1.83 events/h; P = 0.01] and lowest oxygen saturation [MD 5.61%, 95% CI % (3.43, 7.80); P < 0.01]. Meta-regression showed that a higher proportion of male participants was associated with a greater reduction of AHI (p = 0.04). This study showed a positive but modest effect of pharmacotherapy in the reduction of OSA severity. The combination drugs are most applicable to male OSA patients based on their efficacy and pharmacological susceptibility. Pharmacotherapy may be applied as an alternative, adjunctive or synergistic treatment under careful consideration of its side effects.

Impact of reboxetine plus oxybutynin treatment for obstructive sleep apnea on cardiovascular autonomic modulation

The combination of noradrenergic (reboxetine) plus antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) drugs (reb-oxy) reduced obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity but no data are available on its effects on cardiac autonomic modulation. We sought to evaluate the impact of 1-week reb-oxy treatment on cardiovascular autonomic control in OSA patients. OSA patients were randomized to a double-blind, crossover trial comparing 4 mg reboxetine plus 5 mg oxybutynin to a placebo for OSA treatment. Heart rate (HR) variability (HRV), ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) over 24 h baseline and after treatment were performed. Baroreflex sensitivity was tested over beat-to-beat BP recordings. 16 subjects with (median [interquartile range]) age 57 [51-61] years and body mass index 30 [26-36]kg/m² completed the study. The median nocturnal HR was 65 [60-69] bpm at baseline and increased to 69 [64-77] bpm on reb-oxy vs 66 [59-70] bpm on placebo (p = 0.02). The mean 24 h HR from ABPM was not different among treatment groups. Reb-oxy administration was not associated with any modification in HRV or BP. Reb-oxy increased the baroreflex sensitivity and did not induce orthostatic hypotension. In conclusion, administration of reb-oxy did not induce clinically relevant sympathetic overactivity over 1-week and, together with a reduction in OSA severity, it improved the baroreflex function.

The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent findings indicate that noradrenergic and muscarinic processes are crucial for pharyngeal muscle control during sleep. However, to date, reductions in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity have only been detected when noradrenergic agents are combined with an antimuscarinic. Accordingly, this study aimed to determine if reboxetine alone and combined with oxybutynin reduces OSA severity. The pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning the effects of these agents were also investigated via endotyping analysis.

METHODS

Sixteen people (6 women) with OSA completed 3 polysomnograms (∼1-week washout) according to a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover design across 2 sites. Single doses of 4 mg reboxetine, placebo, or 4 mg reboxetine + 5 mg oxybutynin were administered before sleep (order randomized).

RESULTS

Reboxetine reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (primary outcome) by 5.4 (95% confidence interval -10.4 to -0.3) events/h, P = .03 (-24 ± 27% in men; -0.7 ± 32% in women). Oxybutynin did not cause additional reductions in apnea-hypopnea index. Reboxetine alone reduced the 4% oxygen desaturation index by (mean ± standard deviation) 5.2 ± 7.2 events/h and reboxetine+oxybutynin by 5.1 ± 10.6 events/h vs placebo, P = .02. Nadir oxygen saturation also increased by 7 ± 11% with reboxetine and 5 ± 9% with reboxetine+oxybutynin vs placebo, P = .01. Mechanistically, reboxetine and reboxetine+oxybutynin improved pharyngeal collapsibility and respiratory control (loop gain). Larger reductions in apnea-hypopnea index with reboxetine in men were associated with higher baseline loop gain.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show the first evidence that reboxetine alone reduces OSA severity. The data provide novel insight into the role of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors on upper airway stability during sleep and are important to inform future pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; Name: Reboxetine and Combination Therapy with AD128 in Sleep Apnoea Trial: A Double-Blind, 3-Way Cross-Over Study; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374614&isReview=true; Identifier: ACTRN12620000662965.

CITATION

Altree TJ, Aishah A, Loffler KA, Grunstein RR, Eckert DJ. The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):85-96.

Effect of Pimavanserin on the Respiratory Arousal Threshold from Sleep: A Randomized Trial

Rationale: A low respiratory arousal threshold is a key endotype responsible for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathogenesis. Pimavanserin is an antiserotoninergic capable of suppressing CO2-mediated arousals without affecting the respiratory motor response in animal models, and thus it holds potential for increasing the arousal threshold in OSA and subsequently reducing OSA severity. Objectives: We measured the effect of pimavanserin on arousal threshold (primary outcome), OSA severity, arousal index, and other OSA endotypes (secondary outcomes). Methods: A total of 18 OSA participants were studied in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Patients received a single dose of placebo or pimavanserin 34 mg 4 hours before in-lab polysomnography. Airflow was measured with an oronasal mask attached to a pneumotachograph, and ventilatory drive was recorded with an intraesophageal electromyography catheter. Results are presented as mean or median changes (Δ) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Pimavanserin did not increase the arousal threshold, nor did it decrease OSA severity or arousal index. It, however, prolonged total sleep time (Δ[confidence interval (CI)], 39.5 [95%CI, -1.2 to 80.1] min). In an exploratory analysis, a subgroup of seven patients who had a 10% or more increase in arousal threshold on pimavanserin exhibited a decrease in AHI4 (hypopneas associated with 4% desaturation) (Δ[CI], 5.6 [95%CI, 3.6-11.1] events/h) and hypoxic burden (Δ[CI], 22.3 [95%CI, 6.6-32.3] %min/h). Conclusions: A single dose of pimavanserin did not have a significant effect on arousal threshold or OSA severity. However, in a post hoc analysis, a subset of patients who exhibited an increase in arousal threshold on pimavanserin showed a small decrease in OSA severity. Thus, if the arousal threshold could be increased with pimavanserin, perhaps with longer dosing to reach higher drug blood concentrations, then the desired effect on OSA severity might be achievable. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04538755).

Combination of atomoxetine with the novel antimuscarinic aroxybutynin improves mild to moderate OSA

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnea is a common and serious sleep disorder for which treatment remains challenging due to lack of adherence to approved therapies. Previous pharmacological studies addressing sleep-related upper airway muscle hypotonia suggested that the combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin is effective in treating obstructive sleep apnea. The current study is with aroxybutynin (AD109), a new enantiomerically pure form of oxybutynin with better safety profile compared to racemic oxybutynin.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Each received low-dose AD109 (37.5/2.5 mg), high-dose AD109 (75/2.5 mg), and placebo at bedtime across 3 overnight periods in a randomized order. Adverse events were collected by telephone contact with participants during each washout period. The primary endpoint was change in hypoxic burden and secondary endpoint was apnea-hypopnea index.

RESULTS

Patients treated with both the high and low doses of AD109 had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference from placebo in hypoxic burden. Median [interquartile range] hypoxic burden for participants on placebo was 13.9[4.5-21.9] (%min)/h vs 2.3[0.1-10.5] (%min)/h for patients on the high dose (P < .001) and to 7.3[2-12.5] (%min)/h on the low dose (P < .01). Apnea-hypopnea index went from a median of 13.2[8.0-19.1] events/h on placebo reduced to 5.5[2.2 to 9.6] events/h on the high dose (P < .001) and to 7.8[4-13.7] events/h on the low dose (P < .05). AD109 demonstrated a favorable safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides additional support that a pharmacological intervention for obstructive sleep apnea, namely the combination of atomoxetine and aroxybutynin, offers promising results. Additional development of this compound and others is warranted.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: AD109 Dose Finding in Mild to Moderate OSA; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04631107; Identifier: NCT04631107.

CITATION

Rosenberg R, Abaluck B, Thein S. Combination of atomoxetine with the novel antimuscarinic aroxybutynin improves mild to moderate OSA. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(12):2837-2844.

Advances in Molecular Pathology of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common syndrome that features a complex etiology and set of mechanisms. Here we summarized the molecular pathogenesis of OSA, especially the prospective mechanism of upper? airway dilator fatigue and the current breakthroughs. Additionally, we also introduced the molecular mechanism of OSA in terms of related studies on the main signaling pathways and epigenetics alterations, such as microRNA, long non-coding RNA, and DNA methylation. We also reviewed small molecular compounds, which are potential targets for gene regulations in the future, that are involved in the regulation of OSA. This review will be beneficial to point the way for OSA research within the next decade.

Atomoxetine and fesoterodine combination improves obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients with milder upper airway collapsibility

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The combination of the noradrenergic atomoxetine plus the anti-muscarinic oxybutynin acutely increased genioglossus activity and reduced obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity. However, oxybutynin has shorter half-life than atomoxetine and side effects that might discourage long-term usage. Accordingly, we aimed to test the combination of atomoxetine and fesoterodine (Ato-Feso), a newer anti-muscarinic with extended release formulation, on OSA severity and endotypes.

METHODS

Twelve subjects with OSA underwent a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial comparing one night of atomoxetine plus fesoterodine (80-4 mg) to placebo. Parameters of OSA severity (e.g., apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI], nadir oxygen desaturation and hypoxic burden) were calculated from two clinical, in-lab polysomnographic studies. OSA endotypes (including collapsibility per VMIN and arousal threshold) were derived from validated algorithms.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, Ato-Feso did not reduce the AHI (34.2 ± 19.1 vs. 30.1 ± 28.2 events/h, p = 0.493), but reduced the apnoea index (12.9 [28.8] vs. 1.8 [9.1] events/h, median [interquartile range], p = 0.027) and increased nadir desaturation (76.8 [8.0] vs. 82.2 [8.8] %, p = 0.003); a non-significant trend for improved hypoxic burden was observed (52.4 [50.5] vs. 29.7 [78.9] %min/h, p = 0.093). Ato-Feso lowered collapsibility (raised VMIN ; 43.7 [29.8-55.7] vs. 56.8 [43.8-69.8] %VEUPNOEA , mean [CI], p = 0.002), but reduced the arousal threshold (129.3 [120.1-138.6] vs. 116.7 [107.5-126] %VEUPNOEA , p = 0.038). In post hoc analysis, 6/6 patients with milder collapsibility (VMIN  > 43%) exhibited OSA resolution (drop in AHI > 50% and residual AHI < 10 events/h) and improved hypoxaemia.

CONCLUSION

While inefficacious in unselected patients, Ato-Feso administered for one night suppressed OSA in patients with milder collapsibility. Ato-Feso may hold some promise as an alternative OSA treatment in certain subgroups of individuals.

New pharmacologic agents for obstructive sleep apnoea: what do we know and what can we expect?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a condensed description of pharmacological remedies explored in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) as well as projections of what we might expect in terms of clinical performance of these drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional drug therapies explored in OSA have generally produced disappointing results and there is a shortage of pharmacological treatment alternatives in this disorder. Recent insights into pathophysiological mechanisms potentially involved in OSA suggest that the condition may be divided into distinct subgroups based on clusters or defined by means of unique functional endotypic criteria. In fact, positive outcomes in clinical trials have now resulted in several drug candidates that show a convincing reduction of sleep disordered breathing in both short and intermediate term. Such drugs may be particularly useful in certain variants of OSA but not in others. These insights have also raised the ambition to create personalized therapies in OSA. Another recent development is the insight that OSA-linked conditions such as obesity, daytime somnolence and various forms of cardiovascular/metabolic disease may provide drug-based targets. For instance, pharmacological obesity therapy may provide not only positive metabolic effects but may also be a way to eliminate the anatomic component in obese OSA patients.

SUMMARY

Recent insights into the pathophysiology of OSA have opened possibilities to develop personalized therapy. Drugs addressing fundamental aspects of the sleep and breathing disorder provide a particularly promising avenue for development of novel forms of treatment in OSA.

Differential pharmacological and sex-specific effects of antimuscarinic agents at the hypoglossal motor nucleus in vivo in rats

Successful cholinergic-noradrenergic pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is thought to be due to effects at the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN). Clinical efficacy varies with muscarinic-receptor (MR) subtype affinities. We hypothesized that oxybutynin (cholinergic agent in successful OSA pharmacotherapy) is an effective MR antagonist at the HMN and characterized its efficacy with other antagonists. We recorded tongue muscle activity of isoflurane anesthetized rats (121 males and 60 females, 7–13 per group across 13 protocols) in response to HMN microperfusion with MR antagonists with and without: (i) eserine-induced increased endogenous acetylcholine at the HMN and (ii) muscarine. Eserine-induced increased acetylcholine decreased tongue motor activity (p < 0.001) with lesser cholinergic suppression in females versus males (p = 0.017). Motor suppression was significantly attenuated by the MR antagonists atropine, oxybutynin, and omadacycline (MR2 antagonist), each p < 0.001, with similar residual activity between agents (p ≥ 0.089) suggesting similar efficacy at the HMN. Sex differences remained with atropine and oxybutynin (p < 0.001 to 0.05) but not omadacycline (p = 0.722). Muscarine at the HMN also decreased motor activity (p < 0.001) but this was not sex-specific (p = 0.849). These findings have translational relevance to antimuscarinic agents in OSA pharmacotherapy and understanding potential sex differences in HMN suppression with increased endogenous acetylcholine related to sparing nicotinic excitation.

A single dose of noradrenergic/serotonergic reuptake inhibitors combined with an antimuscarinic does not improve obstructive sleep apnoea severity

Previous trials have demonstrated that the combination of noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors with an antimuscarinic can substantially reduce the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) and improve airway collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, some studies have shown that when administered individually, neither noradrenergic or serotonergic agents have been effective at alleviating OSA. This raises the possibility that serotonergic agents (like noradrenergic agents) may also need to be delivered in combination to be efficacious. Therefore, we investigated the effect of an antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) on OSA severity when administered with either duloxetine or milnacipran, two dual noradrenergic/serotonergic reuptake inhibiters. A randomized, double-blind, 4 way cross-over, placebo-controlled trial in ten OSA patients was performed. Patients received each drug condition separately across four overnight in-lab polysomnography (PSG) studies ~1-week apart. The primary outcome measure was the AHI. In addition, the four key OSA endotypes (collapsibility, muscle compensation, arousal threshold, loop gain) were measured non-invasively from the PSGs using validated techniques. There was no significant effect of either drug combinations on reducing the total AHI or improving any of the key OSA endotypes. However, duloxetine+oxybutynin did significantly increase the fraction of hypopnoeas to apnoeas (F_Hypopnoea ) compared to placebo (p = 0.02; d = 0.54). In addition, duloxetine+oxybutynin reduced time in REM sleep (p = 0.009; d = 1.03) which was positively associated with a reduction in the total AHI (R²  = 0.62; p = 0.02). Neither drug combination significantly improved OSA severity or modified the key OSA endotypes when administered as a single dose to unselected OSA patients.

Activity of Pontine A7 Noradrenergic Neurons is suppressed during REM sleep

The activity of hypoglossal motoneurons plays a key role in the maintenance of upper airway patency. The withdrawal of noradrenergic excitatory drive and increase of cholinergic inhibition markedly decreases excitability of hypoglossal motoneurons during sleep and especially during rapid-eye-movement (REM) stage. This leads to increased collapsibility of upper airway during sleep, which is the major neurological factor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathophysiology. Anatomical and functional data suggests that noradrenergic A7 neurons are the main source of noradrenergic drive to hypoglossal motoneurons. However, it is unknown whether the behavior of A7 neurons during sleep-wake cycle is in accord with their proposed involvement in sleep-related depression of hypoglossal motoneuron activity. Therefore, we sought to assess the behavior of A7 neurons during sleep and wakefulness in naturally sleeping head-restrained rats. We have found that, similar to other pontine noradrenergic neurons, the putative A7 noradrenergic neurons fired with relatively long-lasting action potentials with a low frequency regular discharge. Importantly, all noradrenergic A7 neurons were predominantly silent during REM sleep. The REM-off activity of the A7 neurons supports our hypothesis that these neurons may significantly contribute to the withdrawal of excitatory noradrenergic drive from upper airway motoneurons during REM sleep and, consequently, play a critical role in maintaining upper airway patency and pathophysiology of OSA. Therefore, noradrenergic A7 neurons may serve as an additional target for designing pharmacological approaches to treat OSA.

Efficacy of atomoxetine plus oxybutynin in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with moderate pharyngeal collapsibility

Purpose

Preliminary studies have shown a significant decrease in severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with the use of a combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin, with patients having moderate pharyngeal collapsibility during sleep more likely to respond. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AD036 (atomoxetine 80 mg and oxybutynin 5 mg) in the treatment of OSA.

Methods

This trial was a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study comparing AD036, atomoxetine 80 mg alone, and placebo during three home sleep studies, each separated by about 1 week. The trial included patients with OSA and moderate pharyngeal collapsibility as defined by a higher proportion of hypopneas to apneas and mild oxygen desaturation.

Results

Of 62 patients who were randomized, 60 were included in efficacy analyses. The apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) from a median (interquartile range) of 14.2 (5.4 to 22.3) events/h on placebo to 6.2 (2.8 to 13.6) with AD036 and 4.8 (1.4 to 11.6) with atomoxetine alone (p < .0001). Both drugs also decreased the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and the hypoxic burden (p < .0001). AD036, but not atomoxetine alone, reduced the respiratory arousal index and improved ventilation at the respiratory arousal threshold (greater V_active). There was a trend for total sleep time to be decreased more with atomoxetine alone than with AD036. The most common adverse event was insomnia (12% with AD036, 18% with atomoxetine).

Conclusion

AD036 significantly improved OSA severity in patients with moderate pharyngeal collapsibility. Atomoxetine may account for the majority of improvement in OSA severity, while the addition of oxybutynin may mitigate the disruptive effect of atomoxetine on sleep and further improve ventilation.

Trial registration

Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04445688).

Breathing during sleep

The depth, rate, and regularity of breathing change following transition from wakefulness to sleep. Interactions between sleep and breathing involve direct effects of the central mechanisms that generate sleep states exerted at multiple respiratory regulatory sites, such as the central respiratory pattern generator, respiratory premotor pathways, and motoneurons that innervate the respiratory pump and upper airway muscles, as well as effects secondary to sleep-related changes in metabolism. This chapter discusses respiratory effects of sleep as they occur under physiologic conditions. Breathing and central respiratory neuronal activities during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and REM sleep are characterized in relation to activity of central wake-active and sleep-active neurons. Consideration is given to the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome because in this common disorder, state-dependent control of upper airway patency by upper airway muscles attains high significance and recurrent arousals from sleep are triggered by hypercapnic and hypoxic episodes. Selected clinical trials are discussed in which pharmacological interventions targeted transmission in noradrenergic, serotonergic, cholinergic, and other state-dependent pathways identified as mediators of ventilatory changes during sleep. Central pathways for arousals elicited by chemical stimulation of breathing are given special attention for their important role in sleep loss and fragmentation in sleep-related respiratory disorders.

Obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disease that results from loss of upper airway muscle tone leading to upper airway collapse during sleep in anatomically susceptible persons, leading to recurrent periods of hypoventilation, hypoxia, and arousals from sleep. Significant clinical consequences of the disorder cover a wide spectrum and include daytime hypersomnolence, neurocognitive dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, metabolic dysfunction, respiratory failure, and pulmonary hypertension. With escalating rates of obesity a major risk factor for OSA, the public health burden from OSA and its sequalae are expected to increase, as well. In this chapter, we review the mechanisms responsible for the development of OSA and associated neurocognitive and cardiometabolic comorbidities. Emphasis is placed on the neural control of the striated muscles that control the pharyngeal passages, especially regulation of hypoglossal motoneuron activity throughout the sleep/wake cycle, the neurocognitive complications of OSA, and the therapeutic options available to treat OSA including recent pharmacotherapeutic developments.

Reboxetine Plus Oxybutynin for OSA Treatment: A 1-Week, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

The recent discovery that a combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs improved upper airway muscle function during sleep and reduced OSA severity has revitalized interest in pharmacologic therapies for OSA.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Would 1 week of reboxetine plus oxybutynin (Reb-Oxy) be effective on OSA severity?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial was performed comparing 4 mg reboxetine plus 5 mg oxybutynin (Reb-Oxy) vs placebo in patients with OSA. After a baseline in-laboratory polysomnogram (PSG), patients underwent PSGs after 7 nights of Reb-Oxy and 7 nights of placebo to compare apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), which was the primary outcome. Response rate was based on the percentage of subjects with a ≥ 50% reduction in AHI from baseline. Secondary outcomes included Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score and psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) values. Home oximetry evaluated overnight oxygen desaturation index (ODI) throughout treatment.

RESULTS

Sixteen subjects aged 57 [51-61] years (median [interquartile range]) with a BMI of 30 [26-36] kg/m2 completed the study. Reb-Oxy lowered AHI from 49 [35-57] events per hour at baseline to 18 [13-21] events per hour (59% median reduction) compared with 39 [29-48] events per hour (6% median reduction) with placebo (P < .001). Response rate for Reb-Oxy was 81% vs 13% for placebo (P < .001). Although ESS scores were not significantly lowered, PVT median reaction time decreased from 250 [239-312] ms at baseline to 223 [172-244] ms on Reb-Oxy vs 264 [217-284] ms on placebo (P < .001). Home oximetry illustrated acute and sustained improvement in the oxygen desaturation index on Reb-Oxy vs placebo.

INTERPRETATION

The administration of Reb-Oxy greatly decreased OSA severity and increased vigilance. These results highlight potential possibilities for pharmacologic treatment of OSA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04449133; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

The Combination of Betahistine and Oxybutynin Increases Respiratory Control Sensitivity (Loop Gain) in People with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

RATIONALE

There are widespread histaminergic projections throughout the brain, including hypoglossal nuclei, that modulate pharyngeal muscle tone and respiratory control. Hence, histaminergic stimulation pharmacologically may increase pharyngeal muscle tone and stabilize respiratory control (loop gain) to reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. Antimuscarinics also increase REM pharyngeal muscle tone in rats. Thus, a combination of histaminergic and anti-muscarinic drugs may be a novel target for OSA pharmacotherapy. However, this has not been investigated. Accordingly, we aimed to test the effects of betahistine (Beta), an H3-autoreceptor antagonist which thereby increases histamine levels, in combination with the antimuscarinic oxybutynin (Oxy), on OSA severity, OSA endotypes, polysomnography parameters and next-day sleepiness and alertness.

METHODS

Thirteen adults with OSA received either Beta-Oxy (96-5mg) or placebo according to a randomized, crossover, double-blind design, prior to polysomnography. Participants completed the Karolinska Sleep Scale and Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire and a driving simulation task to quantify next-day sleepiness and alertness. OSA endotypes were estimated through validated algorithms using polysomnography.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, Beta-Oxy increased respiratory control sensitivity (loop gain) (0.52[0.24] vs 0.60[0.34], median [IQR], P = 0.021) without systematically changing OSA severity (34.4±17.2 vs 40.3±27.3 events/h, mean±SD, P = 0.124), sleep efficiency, arousal index or markers of hypoxemia. Beta-Oxy was well tolerated and did not worsen next-day sleepiness/alertness.

CONCLUSION

Rather than stabilize breathing during sleep, Beta-Oxy increases loop gain, which is likely to be deleterious for most people with OSA. However, in certain conditions characterized by blunted respiratory control (eg, obesity hypoventilation syndrome), interventions to increase loop gain may be beneficial.

Novel avenues to approach non-CPAP therapy and implement comprehensive OSA care

Recent advances in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathophysiology and translational research have opened new lines of investigation for OSA treatment and management. Key goals of such investigations are to provide efficacious, alternative treatment and management pathways that are better tailored to individual risk profiles to move beyond the traditional, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-focused, "one size fits all", trial and error approach which is too frequently inadequate for many patients. Identification of different clinical manifestations of OSA (clinical phenotypes) and underlying pathophysiological phenotypes (endotypes), that contribute to OSA have provided novel insights into underlying mechanisms and have underpinned these efforts. Indeed, this new knowledge has provided the framework for precision medicine for OSA to improve treatment success rates with existing non-CPAP therapies such as mandibular advancement devices and upper airway surgery, and newly developed therapies such as hypoglossal nerve stimulation and emerging therapies such as pharmacotherapies and combination therapy. These concepts have also provided insight into potential physiological barriers to CPAP adherence for certain patients. This review summarises the recent advances in OSA pathogenesis, non-CPAP treatment, clinical management approaches and highlights knowledge gaps for future research. OSA endotyping and clinical phenotyping, risk stratification and personalised treatment allocation approaches are rapidly evolving and will further benefit from the support of recent advances in e-health and artificial intelligence.

Upper airway muscles: influence on obstructive sleep apnoea pathophysiology and pharmacological and technical treatment options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent with numerous deleterious effects on neurocognitive and cardiovascular health. It is characterized by collapse of the upper airway during sleep, due to the decrease in both basal and compensatory UA muscle activities. However, the leading treatment, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. This review presents latest works focusing on novel interventions targeting upper airway muscles to alleviate OSA severity.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last years, researchers have focused on the development of alternative treatment strategies targeting UA muscle activation, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions.

SUMMARY

Among the nonpharmacological treatments, hypoglossal nerve stimulation aims to increase upper airway muscle phasic activity during sleep through electrical stimulation, while myofunctional therapy improves the activity and coordination of upper airway dilator muscles.Regarding OSA pharmacotherapy, recent findings strongly suggest that selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as atomoxetine and reboxetine, when administered with antimuscarinics such as oxybutynin, can alleviate OSA in most patients increasing pharyngeal dilator muscles activity during sleep. New combinations of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and antimuscarinics have further been explored with variable success and animal models showed that leptin, thyrothropin releasing hormone analogues and gene therapy hold potential for the future of OSA pharmacotherapy.

Different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine have differential effects on obstructive sleep apnea severity

The combination of the noradrenergic agent atomoxetine plus the antimuscarinic oxybutynin has recently been shown to improve upper airway physiology and reduce obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. However, the effects of different antimuscarinics when combined with atomoxetine is limited. This study aimed to determine the effects of atomoxetine combined with two different antimuscarinics with varying M-subtype receptor selectivity on OSA severity and upper airway physiology. Ten people with predominantly severe OSA completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Participants completed three overnight in-laboratory sleep studies after either 80 mg atomoxetine + 5 mg solifenacin succinate (ato-sol) or 80 mg atomoxetine + 2 mg biperiden hydrochloride (ato-bip) or placebo. OSA severity, ventilatory stability (loop gain), respiratory-arousal threshold (via epiglottic manometry), next-day subjective sleepiness [Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)], and alertness were compared between conditions. Neither drug combination altered the apnea/hypopnea index versus placebo (P = 0.63). Ato-sol caused a shift toward milder respiratory events with reduced frequency of obstructive apneas (13 ± 14 vs. 22 ± 17 events/h; means ± SD, P = 0.04) and increased hypopneas during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) (38 ± 21 vs. 24 ± 18 events/h, P = 0.006) with improved nadir oxygenation versus placebo (83 ± 4 vs. 80 ± 8%, P = 0.03). Both combinations reduced loop gain by ∼10% versus placebo; sleep efficiency and arousal threshold were unaltered. Ato-bip reduced next-day sleepiness versus placebo (KSS = 4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.03). Atomoxetine + biperiden hydrochloride reduces perceived sleepiness, and atomoxetine + solifenacin modestly improves upper airway function in people with OSA but to a lesser extent versus recently published atomoxetine + oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity) findings. These results provide novel mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In contrast to recent findings of major reductions in OSA severity when atomoxetine is combined with a nonspecific antimuscarinic, oxybutynin (broad M-subtype receptor selectivity), addition of solifenacin succinate (M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor selectivity) or biperiden (M1 muscarinic receptor selectivity) with atomoxetine had modest effects on upper airway function during sleep, which provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents on sleep and breathing and are important for pharmacotherapy development for OSA.

Modulation of TASK-1/3 channels at the hypoglossal motoneuron pool and effects on tongue motor output and responses to excitatory inputs in vivo: implications for strategies for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) occurs exclusively during sleep due to reduced tongue motor activity. Withdrawal of excitatory inputs to the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN) from wake to sleep contributes to this reduced activity. Several awake-active neurotransmitters with inputs to the HMN (e.g. serotonin [5-HT]) inhibit K+ leak mediated by TASK-1/3 channels on hypoglossal motoneurons, leading to increased neuronal activity in vitro. We hypothesize that TASK channel inhibition at the HMN will increase tongue muscle activity in vivo and modulate responses to 5-HT. We first microperfused the HMN of anesthetized rats with TASK channel inhibitors: doxapram (75 μM, n = 9), A1899 (25 μM, n = 9), ML365 (25 μM, n = 9), acidified artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF, pH = 6.25, n = 9); and a TASK channel activator terbinafine (50 μM, n = 9); all with and without co-applied 5-HT (10 mM). 5-HT alone at the HMN increased tongue motor activity (202.8% ± 45.9%, p < 0.001). However, neither the TASK channel inhibitors, nor activator, at the HMN changed baseline tongue activity (p > 0.716) or responses to 5-HT (p > 0.127). Tonic tongue motor responses to 5-HT at the HMN were also not different (p > 0.05) between ChAT-Cre:TASKf/f mice (n = 8) lacking TASK-1/3 channels on cholinergic neurons versus controls (n = 10). In freely behaving rats (n = 9), microperfusion of A1899 into the HMN increased within-breath phasic tongue motor activity in wakefulness only (p = 0.005) but not sleep, with no effects on tonic activity across all sleep-wake states. Together, the findings suggest robust maintenance of tongue motor activity despite various strategies for TASK channel manipulation targeting the HMN in vivo, and thus currently do not support this target and direction for potential OSA pharmacotherapy.

Cross-sectional case-control study of the relationships between pharyngeal compliance and heart rate variability indices in childhood obstructive sleep apnoea

A combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents reduces the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) via reduced upper airway collapsibility, suggesting that a shift in the sympathovagal balance improves OSA. The objectives of our present case-control study were to assess heart rate variability (HRV) indices in the stages of sleep in children with and without OSA to evaluate OSA-induced sleep HRV modifications and to assess whether increased collapsibility measured during wakefulness is associated with reduced sympathetic activity during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Three groups of 15 children were matched by sex, age, z-score of body mass index and ethnicity: non-OSA (obstructive AHI [OAHI] <2 events/hr), mild (OAHI ≥2 to <5 events/hr) or moderate-severe (OAHI ≥5 events/hr) OSA. Pharyngeal compliance was measured during wakefulness using acoustic pharyngometry. HRV indices (time and frequency domain variables) were calculated on 5-min electrocardiography recordings from polysomnography during wakefulness, NREM and REM sleep in periods free of any event. As compared to children without OSA, those with OSA (n = 30) were characterised by increased compliance and no physiological parasympathetic tone increase in REM sleep. Children with increased pharyngeal compliance (n = 21) had a higher OAHI due to higher AHI in NREM sleep, whereas their sympathetic tone was lower than that of those with normal compliance (n = 24). In conclusion, children with increased pharyngeal compliance exhibit decreased sympathetic tone associated with increased AHI in NREM sleep. Therapeutics directed at sympathovagal balance modifications should be tested in childhood OSA.

GABA and glycine neurons from the ventral medullary region inhibit hypoglossal motoneurons

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder characterized by repetitive sleep-related losses of upper airway patency that occur most frequently during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Hypoglossal motoneurons play a key role in regulating upper airway muscle tone and patency during sleep. REM sleep activates GABA and glycine neurons in the ventral medulla (VM) to induce cortical desynchronization and skeletal muscle atonia during REM sleep; however, the role of this brain region in modulating hypoglossal motor activity is unknown. We combined optogenetic and chemogenetic approaches with in-vitro and in-vivo electrophysiology, respectfully, in GAD2-Cre mice of both sexes to test the hypothesis that VM GABA/glycine neurons control the activity of hypoglossal motoneurons and tongue muscles. Here, we show that there is a pathway originating from GABA/glycine neurons in the VM that monosynaptically inhibits brainstem hypoglossal motoneurons innervating both tongue protruder genioglossus (GMNs) and retractor (RMNs) muscles. Optogenetic activation of ChR2-expressing fibers induced a greater postsynaptic inhibition in RMNs than in GMNs. In-vivo chemogenetic activation of VM GABA/glycine neurons produced an inhibitory effect on tongue electromyographic (EMG) activity, decreasing both the amplitude and duration of inspiratory-related EMG bursts without any change in respiratory rate. These results indicate that activation of GABA/glycine neurons from the VM inhibits tongue muscles via a direct pathway to both GMNs and RMNs. This inhibition may play a role in REM sleep associated upper airway obstructions that occur in patients with OSA.

New frontiers in pharmacologic obstructive sleep apnea treatment: A narrative review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common form of sleep-disordered breathing characterized by intermittent partial or complete closure of the upper airway during sleep. If left untreated, OSA is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes such as hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, stroke, and death. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is often considered the first-line treatment for OSA. While PAP can be very effective in reducing the number of obstructive apneas and hypopneas, its impact on prevention of adverse cardiovascular consequences remains controversial, and treatment adherence is often poor. Hence, the necessity for novel treatment options to help those who cannot adhere to positive airway pressure treatment. Different classes of medications have been tested with regards to their effect on OSA severity. This review 1) provides an update on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of OSA, 2) outlines the mechanistic rationale for medication classes tested as OSA treatment and 3) discusses the effects of these medications on OSA. Several wake-promoting medications are approved for management of persistent sleepiness despite OSA treatment; discussion of these symptomatic treatments is outside the scope of this review. Herein, the authors review the current evidence for pharmacological management of OSA and provide future directions.

Deficiency of Biogenic Amines Modulates the Activity of Hypoglossal Nerve in the Reserpine Model of Parkinson's Disease

The underlying cause of respiratory impairments appearing in Parkinson's disease (PD) is still far from being elucidated. To better understand the pathogenesis of respiratory disorders appearing in PD, we studied hypoglossal (HG) and phrenic (PHR) motoneuron dysfunction in a rat model evoked with reserpine administration. After reserpine, a decrease in the baseline amplitude and minute HG activity was noted, and no depressive phase of the hypoxic ventilatory response was observed. The pre-inspiratory time of HG activity along with the ratio of pre-inspiratory time to total respiratory cycle time and the ratio of pre-inspiratory to inspiratory amplitude were significantly reduced during normoxia, hypoxia, and recovery compared to sham rats. We suggest that the massive depletion of not only dopamine, but above all noradrenaline and serotonin in the brainstem observed in our study, has an impact on the pre-inspiratory activity of the HG. The shortening of the pre-inspiratory activity of the HG in the reserpine model may indicate a serious problem with maintaining the correct diameter of the upper airways in the preparation phase for inspiratory effort and explain the development of obstructive sleep apnea in some PD patients. Therapies involving the supplementation of amine depletion other than dopamine should be considered.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Induced Neurogenic Nocturnal Hypertension: A Potential Role of Renal Denervation?

There is a bidirectional, causal relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and hypertension. OSA-related hypertension is characterized by high rates of masked hypertension, elevated nighttime blood pressure, a nondipper pattern of nocturnal hypertension, and abnormal blood pressure variability. Hypoxia/hypercapnia-related sympathetic activation is a key pathophysiological mechanism linking the 2 conditions. Intermittent hypoxia also stimulates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to promote hypertension development. The negative and additive cardiovascular effects of OSA and hypertension highlight the importance of effectively managing these conditions, especially when they coexist in the same patient. Continuous positive airway pressure is the gold standard therapy for OSA but its effects on blood pressure are relatively modest. Furthermore, this treatment did not reduce the cardiovascular event rate in nonsleepy patients with OSA in randomized controlled trials. Antihypertensive agents targeting sympathetic pathways or the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have theoretical potential in comorbid hypertension and OSA, but current evidence is limited and combination strategies are often required in drug resistant or refractory patients. The key role of sympathetic nervous system activation in the development of hypertension in OSA suggests potential for catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation. Although long-term, randomized controlled trials are needed, available data indicate sustained and relevant reductions in blood pressure in patients with hypertension and OSA after renal denervation, with the potential to also improve respiratory parameters. The combination of lifestyle interventions, optimal pharmacological therapy, continuous positive airway pressure therapy, and perhaps also renal denervation might improve cardiovascular risk in patients with OSA.

Gene delivery to the hypoglossal motor system: preclinical studies and translational potential

Dysfunction and/or reduced activity in the tongue muscles contributes to conditions such as dysphagia, dysarthria, and sleep disordered breathing. Current treatments are often inadequate, and the tongue is a readily accessible target for therapeutic gene delivery. In this regard, gene therapy specifically targeting the tongue motor system offers two general strategies for treating lingual disorders. First, correcting tongue myofiber and/or hypoglossal (XII) motoneuron pathology in genetic neuromuscular disorders may be readily achieved by intralingual delivery of viral vectors. The retrograde movement of viral vectors such as adeno-associated virus (AAV) enables targeted distribution to XII motoneurons via intralingual viral delivery. Second, conditions with impaired or reduced tongue muscle activation can potentially be treated using viral-driven chemo- or optogenetic approaches to activate or inhibit XII motoneurons and/or tongue myofibers. Further considerations that are highly relevant to lingual gene therapy include (1) the diversity of the motoneurons which control the tongue, (2) the patterns of XII nerve branching, and (3) the complexity of tongue muscle anatomy and biomechanics. Preclinical studies show considerable promise for lingual directed gene therapy in neuromuscular disease, but the potential of such approaches is largely untapped.

Impact of cold and flu medication on obstructive sleep apnoea and its underlying traits: A pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Animal studies indicate that alpha-1 adrenergic receptor agonists and antimuscarinic agents improve genioglossus muscle activity during sleep and may be candidates for the pharmacological treatment of OSA. On the other hand, noradrenergic stimulants may be wake-promoting or cause insomnia symptoms if taken before bedtime, and the addition of a medication with sedative properties, such as an antihistaminic, may reduce these side effects. In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of the combination of an alpha-1 adrenergic agonist (pseudoephedrine) and an antihistaminic-antimuscarinic (diphenhydramine) on OSA severity (AHI), genioglossus responsiveness and other endotypic traits (V_passive , muscle compensation, LG and arousal threshold).

METHODS

Ten OSA patients performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial comparing one night of pseudoephedrine 120 mg plus diphenhydramine 50 mg (DAW1033D) to placebo administered prior to sleep. The AHI, genioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative oesophageal pressure and the endotypic traits were measured via PSG.

RESULTS

The participants' median (interquartile range) age was 50 (46-53) years and body mass index (BMI) was 34.3 (30.6-39.2) kg/m² . The drug combination had no effect on AHI (21.6 (9.1-49.8) on placebo vs 37.9 (5.1-55.4) events/h on DAW1033D, P > 0.5) or genioglossus responsiveness (6.0 (2.6-9.2) on placebo vs 4.0 (3.5-7.3) %/cm H₂ O). Amongst the phenotypic traits, only V_passive was improved by 29 (3-55) % eupnoea, P = 0.03 (mean (95% CI)).

CONCLUSION

The combination of pseudoephedrine and diphenhydramine did not improve OSA severity or genioglossus responsiveness but induced a small improvement in upper airway collapsibility, possibly due to the decongestant effect of the medications. The results of this study do not support the use of these medications for OSA treatment.

Reboxetine and hyoscine butylbromide improve upper airway function during nonrapid eye movement and suppress rapid eye movement sleep in healthy individuals

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent findings indicate that noradrenergic and antimuscarinic processes are crucial for sleep-related reductions in pharyngeal muscle activity. However, there are few human studies. Accordingly, this study aimed to determine if a combined noradrenergic and antimuscarinic intervention increases pharyngeal dilator muscle activity and improves airway function in sleeping humans.

METHODS

Genioglossus (GG) and tensor palatini electromyography (EMG), pharyngeal pressure, upper airway resistance, and breathing parameters were acquired in 10 healthy adults (5 female) during two overnight sleep studies after 4 mg of reboxetine (REB) plus 20 mg of hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) or placebo using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over design.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, peak and tonic GG EMG were lower (Mean ± SD: 83 ± 73 vs. 130 ± 75, p = 0.021 and 102 ± 102 vs. 147 ± 123 % wakefulness, p = 0.021, respectively) but the sleep-related reduction in tensor palatini was less (Median [25th, 75th centiles]: 53[45, 62] vs. 34[28, 38] % wakefulness, p = 0.008) with the drug combination during nonrapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep. These changes were accompanied by improved upper airway function including reduced pharyngeal pressure swings, airway resistance, respiratory load compensation, and increased breathing frequency during N2. REB and HBB significantly reduced rapid eye movement sleep compared with placebo (0.6 ± 1.1 vs. 14.5 ± 6.8 % total sleep time, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, GG muscle activity (% wakefulness) during non-REM sleep was lower with REB and HBB. However, sleep-related reductions in tensor palatini activity were less and upper airway function improved. These findings provide mechanistic insight into the role of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic processes on upper airway function in humans and have therapeutic potential for obstructive sleep apnea.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au, trial ID: ACTRN12616000469415.

Effects of the Combination of Atomoxetine and Oxybutynin on OSA Endotypic Traits

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that administration of the combination of the noradrenergic drug atomoxetine plus the antimuscarinic oxybutynin (ato-oxy) prior to sleep greatly reduced OSA severity, likely by increasing upper airway dilator muscle activity during sleep. In patients with OSA who performed the ato-oxy trial with an esophageal pressure catheter to estimate ventilatory drive, the effect of the drug combination (n = 17) and of the single drugs (n = 6) was measured on the endotypic traits over a 1-night administration and compared vs placebo. This study also tested if specific traits were predictors of complete response to treatment (reduction in apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 50% and < 10 events/h).

METHODS

The study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The arousal threshold, collapsibility (ventilation at eupneic drive [Vpassive]), ventilation at arousal threshold, and loop gain (stability of ventilatory control, LG1), were calculated during spontaneous breathing during sleep. Muscle compensation (upper airway response) was calculated as a function of ventilation at arousal threshold adjusted for Vpassive. Ventilation was expressed as a percentage of the eupneic level of ventilation (%_eupnea). Data are presented as mean [95% CI].

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, ato-oxy increased Vpassive by 73 [54 to 91]%_eupnea (P < .001) and muscle compensation by 29 [8 to 51]%_eupnea (P = .012), reduced the arousal threshold by -9 [-14 to -3]% (P = .022) and LG1 by -11 [-22 to 2]% (P = .022). Atomoxetine alone significantly reduced arousal threshold and LG1. Both agents alone improved collapsibility (Vpassive) but not muscle compensation. Patients with lower AHI, higher Vpassive, and higher fraction of hypopneas over total events had a complete response with ato-oxy.

FINDINGS

Ato-oxy markedly improved the measures of upper airway collapsibility, increased breathing stability, and slightly reduced the arousal threshold. Patients with relatively lower AHI and less severe upper airway collapsibility had the best chance for OSA resolution with ato-oxy.

The Role of Animal Models in Developing Pharmacotherapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disease characterized by recurrent closure of the upper airway during sleep. It has a complex pathophysiology involving four main phenotypes. An abnormal upper airway anatomy is the key factor that predisposes to sleep-related collapse of the pharynx, but it may not be sufficient for OSA development. Non-anatomical traits, including (1) a compromised neuromuscular response of the upper airway to obstruction, (2) an unstable respiratory control (high loop gain), and (3) a low arousal threshold, predict the development of OSA in association with anatomical abnormalities. Current therapies for OSA, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oral appliances, have poor adherence or variable efficacy among patients. The search for novel therapeutic approaches for OSA, including pharmacological agents, has been pursued over the past years. New insights into OSA pharmacotherapy have been provided by preclinical studies, which highlight the importance of appropriate use of animal models of OSA, their applicability, and limitations. In the present review, we discuss potential pharmacological targets for OSA discovered using animal models.

Alpha-1 Adrenergic-Antagonist Use Increases the Risk of Sleep Apnea: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Decreased upper-airway muscle responsiveness is one of the major phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea. Use of α1-adrenergic antagonists is correlated with decreased muscle responsiveness in animal studies, but this association has not yet been demonstrated in humans. This study examined whether use of α1-adrenergic antagonists is an independent risk factor for sleep apnea in humans.

METHODS

Data for this retrospective cohort study were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database from Taiwan. Between 2000 and 2012, 25,466 patients with hypertension and 18,930 patients without hypertension were enrolled. These groups were divided into α1-adrenergic antagonist users and nonusers, matched by age, sex, and index year. Individuals were monitored for diagnosis of sleep apnea until 2013.

RESULTS

After adjusting for propensity score and potential confounders, including age, geographic location, enrollee category, income, urbanization level, comorbidities, and medication, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for development of sleep apnea with α1-adrenergic antagonist use were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-3.10) and 2.82 (95% CI 1.79-4.44) in the hypertension and nonhypertension groups, respectively. Similarly, the adjusted HRs for development of severe sleep apnea with α1-adrenergic antagonist use were 2.74 (95% CI 1.78-4.22) and 4.23 (95% CI 1.57-11.40) in hypertension and nonhypertension patient groups, respectively. The interaction between α1-adrenergic-antagonist user and patients with hypertension was tested using multivariable Cox regression. The results showed that there are positive additive interactions for developing sleep apnea and severe sleep apnea, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that patients with hypertension using α1-adrenergic antagonists have a higher risk of sleep apnea. Routine sleep apnea screening would be beneficial for patients with hypertension who take α1-adrenergic antagonists.

Targeting Endotypic Traits with Medications for the Pharmacological Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Review of the Current Literature

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition with few therapeutic options. To date there is no approved pharmacotherapy for this disorder, but several attempts have been made in the past and are currently ongoing to find one. The recent identification of multiple endotypes underlying this disorder has oriented the pharmacological research towards tailored therapies targeting specific pathophysiological traits that contribute differently to cause OSA in each patient. In this review we retrospectively analyze the literature on OSA pharmacotherapy dividing the medications tested on the basis of the four main endotypes: anatomy, upper airway muscle activity, arousal threshold and ventilatory instability (loop gain). We show how recently introduced drugs for weight loss that modify upper airway anatomy may play an important role in the management of OSA in the near future, and promising results have been obtained with drugs that increase upper airway muscle activity during sleep and reduce loop gain. The lack of a medication that can effectively increase the arousal threshold makes this strategy less encouraging, although recent studies have shown that the use of certain sedatives do not worsen OSA severity and could actually improve patients' sleep quality.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Emerging Treatments Targeting the Genioglossus Muscle

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive episodes of upper airway obstruction caused by a loss of upper airway dilator muscle tone during sleep and an inadequate compensatory response by these muscles in the context of an anatomically compromised airway. The genioglossus (GG) is the main upper airway dilator muscle. Currently, continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line treatment for OSA. Nevertheless, problems related to poor adherence have been described in some groups of patients. In recent years, new OSA treatment strategies have been developed to improve GG function. (A) Hypoglossal nerve electrical stimulation leads to significant improvements in objective (apnea-hypopnea index, or AHI) and subjective measurements of OSA severity, but its invasive nature limits its application. (B) A recently introduced combination of drugs administered orally before bedtime reduces AHI and improves the responsiveness of the GG. (C) Finally, myofunctional therapy also decreases AHI, and it might be considered in combination with other treatments. Our objective is to review these therapies in order to advance current understanding of the prospects for alternative OSA treatments.