Association of Mortality with Neuromuscular Blockade Differs according to Baseline Diaphragm Thickness

Post-insufflation diaphragm contractions in patients receiving various modes of mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

During mechanical ventilation, post-insufflation diaphragm contractions (PIDCs) are non-physiologic and could be injurious. PIDCs could be frequent during reverse-triggering, where diaphragm contractions follow the ventilator rhythm. Whether PIDCs happens with different modes of assisted ventilation is unknown. In mechanically ventilated patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, we aimed to examine whether PIDCs are associated with ventilator settings, patients' characteristics or both.

METHODS

One-hour recordings of diaphragm electromyography (EAdi), airway pressure and flow were collected once per day for up to five days from intubation until full recovery of diaphragm activity or death. Each breath was classified as mandatory (without-reverse-triggering), reverse-triggering, or patient triggered. Reverse triggering was further subclassified according to EAdi timing relative to ventilator cycle or reverse triggering leading to breath-stacking. EAdi timing (onset, offset), peak and neural inspiratory time (Tineuro) were measured breath-by-breath and compared to the ventilator expiratory time. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to investigate factors independently associated with PIDCs, including EAdi timing, amplitude, Tineuro, ventilator settings and APACHE II.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (median[25%-75%IQR] age: 63[52-77] years, BMI: 24.9[22.9-33.7] kg/m2, 49% male, APACHE II: 21[19-28]) contributed 2 ± 1 recordings each, totaling 183,962 breaths. PIDCs occurred in 74% of reverse-triggering, 27% of pressure support breaths, 21% of assist-control breaths, 5% of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) breaths. PIDCs were associated with higher EAdi peak (odds ratio [OR][95%CI] 1.01[1.01;1.01], longer Tineuro (OR 37.59[34.50;40.98]), shorter ventilator inspiratory time (OR 0.27[0.24;0.30]), high peak inspiratory flow (OR 0.22[0.20;0.26]), and small tidal volumes (OR 0.31[0.25;0.37]) (all P ≤ 0.008). NAVA was associated with absence of PIDCs (OR 0.03[0.02;0.03]; P < 0.001). Reverse triggering was characterized by lower EAdi peak than breaths triggered under pressure support and associated with small tidal volume and shorter set inspiratory time than breaths triggered under assist-control (all P < 0.05). Reverse triggering leading to breath stacking was characterized by higher peak EAdi and longer Tineuro and associated with small tidal volumes compared to all other reverse-triggering phenotypes (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, PIDCs and reverse triggering phenotypes were associated with potentially modifiable factors, including ventilator settings. Proportional modes like NAVA represent a solution abolishing PIDCs.

From ICU Syndromes to ICU Subphenotypes: Consensus Report and Recommendations for Developing Precision Medicine in the ICU

Critical care uses syndromic definitions to describe patient groups for clinical practice and research. There is growing recognition that a "precision medicine" approach is required and that integrated biologic and physiologic data identify reproducible subpopulations that may respond differently to treatment. This article reviews the current state of the field and considers how to successfully transition to a precision medicine approach. To impact clinical care, identification of subpopulations must do more than differentiate prognosis. It must differentiate response to treatment, ideally by defining subgroups with distinct functional or pathobiological mechanisms (endotypes). There are now multiple examples of reproducible subpopulations of sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute kidney or brain injury described using clinical, physiological, and/or biological data. Many of these subpopulations have demonstrated the potential to define differential treatment response, largely in retrospective studies, and that the same treatment-responsive subpopulations may cross multiple clinical syndromes (treatable traits). To bring about a change in clinical practice, a precision medicine approach must be evaluated in prospective clinical studies requiring novel adaptive trial designs. Several such studies are underway, but there are multiple challenges to be tackled. Such subpopulations must be readily identifiable and be applicable to all critically ill populations around the world. Subdividing clinical syndromes into subpopulations will require large patient numbers. Global collaboration of investigators, clinicians, industry, and patients over many years will therefore be required to transition to a precision medicine approach and ultimately realize treatment advances seen in other medical fields.

Reverse Triggering during Controlled Ventilation: From Physiology to Clinical Management

Reverse triggering dyssynchrony is a frequent phenomenon recently recognized in sedated critically ill patients under controlled ventilation. It occurs in at least 30-55% of these patients and often occurs in the transition from fully passive to assisted mechanical ventilation. During reverse triggering, patient inspiratory efforts start after the passive insufflation by mechanical breaths. The most often referred mechanism is the entrainment of the patient's intrinsic respiratory rhythm from the brainstem respiratory centers to periodic mechanical insufflations from the ventilator. However, reverse triggering might also occur because of local reflexes without involving the respiratory rhythm generator in the brainstem. Reverse triggering is observed during the acute phase of the disease, when patients may be susceptible to potential deleterious consequences of injurious or asynchronous efforts. Diagnosing reverse triggering might be challenging and can easily be missed. Inspection of ventilator waveforms or more sophisticated methods, such as the electrical activity of the diaphragm or esophageal pressure, can be used for diagnosis. The occurrence of reverse triggering might have clinical consequences. On the basis of physiological data, reverse triggering might be beneficial or injurious for the diaphragm and the lung, depending on the magnitude of the inspiratory effort. Reverse triggering can cause breath-stacking and loss of protective lung ventilation when triggering a second cycle. Little is known about how to manage patients with reverse triggering; however, available evidence can guide management on the basis of physiological principles.