Absence of deep inspiration-induced bronchoprotection against inhaled allergen

Chronic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces airway reactivity in vivo in an allergen-induced rabbit model of asthma

Previous studies have demonstrated that chronic mechanical strain produced by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces in vivo airway reactivity in rabbits and ferrets. For CPAP to potentially have a therapeutic benefit for asthmatic subjects, the reduction in airway responsiveness would need to persist for 12-24 h after its discontinuation, require application for only part of the day, and be effective in the presence of atopic airway inflammation. In the present study, airway responsiveness to acetylcholine or methacholine was measured during mechanical ventilation following three different protocols in which active, nonanesthetized, tracheotomized rabbits were treated with High vs. Low CPAP (6 vs. 0 cmH(2)O). 1) High CPAP was applied continuously for 4 days followed by 1 day of Low CPAP; 2) High CPAP was applied at night and Low CPAP during the daytime for 4 days, and 3) High CPAP was applied for 4 days in animals following ovalbumin (Ova) sensitization and challenge. For all three protocols, treatment with High CPAP resulted in significantly reduced airway responsiveness compared with treatment with Low CPAP. Cumulatively, our in vivo results in rabbits suggest that high CPAP, even when applied only at night, produces a persistent reduction of airway responsiveness. In addition, CPAP reduces airway responsiveness even in the presence of atopic airway inflammation.

The dynamic face of respiratory research: understanding the effect of airway disease on a lung in constant motion

The lungs are in a constant state of motion. The dynamic nature of tidal breathing, whereby cycles of pressure changes across the lungs cause the chest wall, lung tissue and airways to repeatedly expand and contract, ventilates the lung tissue and allows respiration to occur. However, these regular cycles of tidal inspirations and expirations are punctuated by breaths of differing volumes, most particularly periodic deep inspirations. In normal, healthy subjects, these deep inspirations have a dual effect in reducing airway responsiveness. Firstly, deep inspirations taken under baseline conditions protect the airways against subsequent bronchoconstriction, termed DI bronchoprotection. Secondly, deep inspirations are able to dramatically reverse bronchoconstriction. The ability for deep inspirations to reverse bronchoconstriction appears to be due to both the ability to dilate the airways with a full inspiration to total lung capacity (TLC) and the rate at which the airways re-narrow once tidal breathing is resumed. Deep inspiration reversal is reduced in subjects with asthma and is due both to a reduced ability to dilate the airways as well as an increase in the rate of re-narrowing. On the other hand, DI bronchoprotection is completely absent in asthma. Although the mechanisms behind these abnormalities remain unclear, the inability for deep inspirations to both protect against and fully reverse bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma appears critical in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness. As such, determining the pathophysiology responsible for the malfunction of deep inspirations in asthma remains critical to understanding the disease and is likely to pave the way for novel therapeutic targets.

Airway response to exercise by forced oscillations in asthmatic children

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) detection of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) to identify asthma has good specificity but rather low sensitivity. The aim was to test whether sensitivity may be improved by measuring respiratory resistance (Rrs) by the forced oscillation technique (FOT). Forty-seven asthmatic and 50 control children (5-12 y) were studied before and after running 6 min on a treadmill. Rrs in inspiration (Rrsi) and expiration (Rrse), FEV1 and Rrsi response to a deep inhalation (DI) were measured before and after exercise. In asthmatics versus controls, exercise induced significantly larger increases in Rrsi (p < 0.001) and larger decreases in FEV1 (p = 0.004). Asthmatics but not controls showed more bronchodilation by DI after exercise (p = 0.02). At specificity >0.90, sensitivity was 0.53 with 25% increase Rrsi and 0.45 with 27% increase Rrse or 5% decrease FEV1. It is concluded that the FOT improves sensitivity of exercise challenge, and the Rrsi response to DI may prove useful in identifying the mechanism of airway obstruction.

Bronchodilation response to deep inspirations in asthma is dependent on airway distensibility and air trapping

In healthy individuals, deep inspirations (DIs) have a potent bronchodilatory ability against methacholine (MCh)-induced bronchoconstriction. This is variably attenuated in asthma. We hypothesized that inability to bronchodilate with DIs is related to reduced airway distensibility. We examined the relationship between DI-induced bronchodilation and airway distensibility in 15 asthmatic individuals with a wide range of baseline lung function [forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) = 60-99% predicted]. After abstaining from DIs for 20 min, subjects received a single-dose MCh challenge and then asked to perform DIs. The effectiveness of DIs was assessed by the ability of the subjects to improve FEV(1). The same subjects were studied by two sets of high-resolution CT scans, one at functional residual capacity (FRC) and one at total lung capacity (TLC). In each subject, the areas of 21-41 airways (0.8-6.8 mm diameter at FRC) were matched and measured, and airway distensibility (increase in airway diameter from FRC to TLC) was calculated. The bronchodilatory ability of DIs was significantly lower in individuals with FEV(1) <75% predicted than in those with FEV(1) ≥75% predicted (15 ± 11% vs. 46 ± 9%, P = 0.04) and strongly correlated with airway distensibility (r = 0.57, P = 0.03), but also with residual volume (RV)/TLC (r = -0.63, P = 0.01). In multiple regression, only RV/TLC was a significant determinant of DI-induced bronchodilation. These relationships were lost when the airways were examined after maximal bronchodilation with albuterol. Our data indicate that the loss of the bronchodilatory effect of DI in asthma is related to the ability to distend the airways with lung inflation, which is, in turn, related to the extent of air trapping and airway smooth muscle tone. These relationships only exist in the presence of airway tone, indicating that structural changes in the conducting airways visualized by high-resolution CT do not play a pivotal role.

Effect of parenchymal stiffness on canine airway size with lung inflation

Although airway patency is partially maintained by parenchymal tethering, this structural support is often ignored in many discussions of asthma. However, agonists that induce smooth muscle contraction also stiffen the parenchyma, so such parenchymal stiffening may serve as a defense mechanism to prevent airway narrowing or closure. To quantify this effect, specifically how changes in parenchymal stiffness alter airway size at different levels of lung inflation, in the present study, we devised a method to separate the effect of parenchymal stiffening from that of direct airway narrowing. Six anesthetized dogs were studied under four conditions: baseline, after whole lung aerosol histamine challenge, after local airway histamine challenge, and after complete relaxation of the airways. In each of these conditions, we used High resolution Computed Tomography to measure airway size and lung volume at five different airway pressures (0, 12, 25, 32, and 45 cm H(2)O). Parenchymal stiffening had a protective effect on airway narrowing, a fact that may be important in the airway response to deep inspiration in asthma. When the parenchyma was stiffened by whole lung aerosol histamine challenge, at every lung volume above FRC, the airways were larger than when they were directly challenged with histamine to the same initial constriction. These results show for the first time that a stiff parenchyma per se minimizes the airway narrowing that occurs with histamine challenge at any lung volume. Thus in clinical asthma, it is not simply increased airway smooth muscle contraction, but perhaps a lack of homogeneous parenchymal stiffening that contributes to the symptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness.

Airway responsiveness to methacholine and deep inhalations in subjects with rhinitis without asthma

BACKGROUND

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma is believed to be caused in part by the inability of deep inspirations to modulate airway narrowing.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether deep inspirations taken before or after methacholine inhalation attenuate bronchoconstriction in subjects with rhinitis. The results were compared with a group of healthy subjects.

METHODS

Ten subjects with rhinitis without asthma and 10 healthy subjects were studied on 3 different occasions at random. Bronchial challenges were performed with a single dose of methacholine known to decrease the FEV(1) by 17% to 40%. Challenges were performed with avoidance of deep inspirations, or with 5 deep inspirations preceding or following the inhalation of methacholine. Lung function measurements were specific airway conductance, forced expiratory flow at 30% to 40% of vital capacity on a maneuver started from end-tidal inspiration (partial flow), and residual volume (partial residual volume).

RESULTS

In healthy subjects, deep inspirations taken after methacholine caused less changes in specific airway conductance, partial flow, and partial residual volume (P < .005 for all) than deep inspirations taken before methacholine or avoidance. In subjects with rhinitis, methacholine produced similar functional changes independently of the presence or absence of any deep inspirations. Compared with normal subjects, the attenuating effects of deep inspirations after methacholine on partial flow and partial residual volume were blunted in the subjects with rhinitis (P = .02 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ability to dilate methacholine-constricted airways by deep inspirations is impaired in subjects with rhinitis, possibly because of an abnormal behavior of airway smooth muscle.

The role of lung inflation in airway hyperresponsiveness and in asthma

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a fundamental phenomenon in asthma that can explain many aspects of the clinical manifestations of the disease. Several theories on the mechanisms of AHR have been proposed, but the true nature of this problem is yet to be defined. During the past decade, the role of lung inflation in airway physiology and its relationship to AHR have attracted major attention. Deep inspirations are known to exert strong beneficial effects on the airways of healthy humans. These effects appear to be of dual nature: bronchoprotective and bronchodilatory. The bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration is lost in asthma, even in mild disease. It is also lost in individuals with rhinitis and AHR, but no asthma. Therefore, the loss of bronchoprotection is related to AHR. The bronchodilatory effect of deep inspiration is somewhat reduced in mild asthma and is only lost in severe disease, in the presence of significant airway obstruction. Current research is focused on the elucidation of the physiologic mechanisms behind lung inflation-induced bronchoprotection and bronchodilation and on the causes of their loss. This information could open new horizons in asthma therapy and prevention.

Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection by deep inspiration and their relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a cardinal feature of asthma. Airway inflammation and BHR are probably linked, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain elusive. BHR is closely associated with defects in the beneficial responses to lung inflation. These responses, which become apparent by the fact that healthy individuals can develop severe airway obstruction if they are exposed to methacholine in the absence of deep inspirations, include bronchodilation and bronchoprotection. Bronchodilation refers to the effect of lung inflation after the induction of airway smooth muscle tone, while bronchoprotection is used to indicate the effect prior to inhalation of a spasmogen. Mild asthmatics who manifest BHR lack bronchoprotection by lung inflation. In contrast, many of them are able to bronchodilate. In more severe disease, both functions are impaired. The lack of bronchoprotection is also found in individuals with rhinitis and BHR, but no asthma. These and other observations suggest that the mechanisms of bronchodilation and bronchoprotection may be distinct, although overlap is possible. We believe that the loss of bronchoprotection is pertinent to the phenomenon of hyperresponsiveness, but that both the bronchodilatory and bronchoprotective functions of deep inspiration interact to produce the asthmatic phenotype. In this review, we describe the phenomena of lung inflation-induced bronchodilation and bronchoprotection and detail potential mechanical and neurohumoral mechanisms accounting for these physiologic functions. In addition, possible mechanisms leading to the impairment of these functions in subjects with BHR are discussed.